Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 70 references

Suppression of Quantum Correlations in a Clean-Disordered Atom-Nanophotonic Interface

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Enlarging the clean zone of a waveguide-coupled atomic array suppresses high-order quantum correlations in the disordered zone, signaling delocalization that leaves excitation populations untouched.

arxiv 2412.13524 v1 pith:KBES3E2E submitted 2024-12-18 quant-ph

I Gusti Ngurah Yudi Handayana , Yi-Lin Tsao , H. H. Jen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumcorrelationsdisorder-inducedlocalizationdelocalizationatom-nanophotonicinterfacewaveguideelectrodynamicslong-rangespin-exchangeinteractionsentanglemententropyKubocumulantexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a one-dimensional array of atoms coupled to a waveguide, split into a clean zone and a strongly disordered zone, with the clean zone initially empty and all excitations placed in the disordered side. It tries to establish that the size of the clean zone controls the high-order quantum correlations of those localized excitations: as the clean zone grows, the second- and third-order correlations in the disordered zone are suppressed, even though excitation populations stay put. The paper interprets this as a delocalization of high-order spin-exchange processes mediated by long-range photon-mediated interactions, and it supports the reading with an entanglement entropy across the interface that grows and peaks later for larger clean zones. If the interpretation is right, population snapshots miss an entire channel of thermalization in long-range interacting open quantum systems, because the clean zone acts as a tunable thermal bath through correlations, not transport.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a one-dimensional atom-nanophotonic interface: an array of two-level atoms coupled to a waveguide, with photon-mediated spin-exchange couplings between every pair of atoms and disorder entering through random position phases. The array is split at site $m=0$ into a clean zone and a disordered zone, and excitations are initialized in a half-Dicke state, the symmetric state with $M$ excitations spread evenly across the disordered zone. The observables that carry the argument are the connected second- and third-order correlation functions $G^{(2)}(i,j)$ and $G^{(3)}(i,j,k)$ from the Kubo cumulant expansion, with one index averaged over all clean-zone sites, together with the von Neumann entanglement entropy across the interface. Suppression of those averaged correlations as the clean-zone size grows is the reported signature of delocalization.

What would settle it

Compute the second-order correlation $G^{(2)}(i,j)$ for a fixed pair of sites—one clean-zone site $i$ and one disordered-zone site $j$—as the clean-zone size $N_c$ is increased, instead of averaging over all clean sites $i$. If the fixed-site correlation stays constant while the clean-zone-averaged value falls, the suppression is an artifact of the averaging; if the fixed-site correlation falls too, the delocalization claim is genuine. The same control applied to $G^{(3)}$ with a fixed clean-site $k$ settles whether the higher-order effect is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the authors' own terms, is that enlarging the clean zone in a clean-disordered atom-nanophotonic array suppresses the high-order quantum correlations of localized atomic excitations in the disordered zone even though the excitation populations remain pinned by strong disorder. This is not a claim that excitations move; it is a claim that the high-order spin-exchange processes delocalize: the all-to-all photon-mediated interactions let the growing clean zone participate in multi-excitation coincidence events without transferring population. The same conclusion is supported by the interface entanglement entropy, which grows and peaks later as the clean zone becomes larger. In the paper's framing, the clean zone acts as a thermal inclusion whose size controls higher-order quantum correlations, in contrast to short-range interacting systems where such correlations concentrate near the interface.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that averaging the correlation over all sites in the initially empty clean zone is not what makes the average shrink as that zone grows; the paper does not check fixed-site or fixed-distance correlations, so the whole phenomenon could in principle be the dilution of an empty average.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A larger clean zone suppresses second- and third-order quantum correlations among excitations that remain localized in the disordered zone, so population measurements alone would not reveal the delocalization.
  • The interface entanglement entropy rises and peaks later as the clean zone grows, meaning the clean-zone size controls the timescale on which the two zones exchange quantum information.
  • The suppression is uniform and shows no interface-pinned structure, distinguishing long-range spin-exchange systems from short-range interacting systems such as Bose-Hubbard avalanches.
  • Within the strong-coupling regime, the effect should be observable in waveguide-QED experiments with trapped atoms by comparing correlation maps for different clean-zone sizes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the suppression survives a fixed-distance correlation check, it would imply that a clean bath can thermalize a disordered system purely through higher-order processes, with no population leakage—a distinctive route to many-body delocalization that could be tested in other long-range interacting platforms.
  • Beyond the paper: the authors initialize the clean zone empty, so varying the number of initially excited clean-zone atoms would separate the role of bath emptiness from bath size and sharpen the claimed mechanism.
  • Beyond the paper: the clean-zone-dependent delay of the entropy peak suggests that the clean-zone size could be used as a tunable reservoir parameter in waveguide-QED quantum information protocols, controlling when and how strongly the interface becomes entangled.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper numerically studies a one-dimensional atomic array coupled to a waveguide, partitioned into a clean zone and a disordered zone, initialized with M=2 or M=3 excitations in the disordered zone (p=0). Using exact solution of the Lindblad master equation in the few-excitation sector with 2000 disorder realizations, it reports that the clean-site-averaged second- and third-order quantum correlations G^(2)(j)_clean and G^(3)(i,j)_clean decrease as the clean-zone size Nc increases, and that the entanglement entropy across the interface increases. The authors interpret these observations as evidence that a larger clean zone suppresses localized quantum correlations and promotes delocalization of high-order spin-exchange processes, in contrast to short-range interacting systems.

Significance. If established, the claimed effect would be a new mechanism for controlling localization-delocalization in waveguide QED through the size of an initially empty clean bath, relevant to quantum avalanches and many-body localization. The numerical approach is in principle sound and transparent: the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian and Lindblad terms are given explicitly, expectation values are obtained from exact state-vector evolution, and the disorder averaging is checked for convergence. No free parameters are fitted to the predicted effect. However, the central observable is an arithmetic mean over the clean zone, which is initially empty and carries an essentially Nc-independent total population; this mean is mathematically bounded by P_clean/Nc and is therefore forced to decrease with Nc. The paper does not provide the necessary control (summed, fixed-site, or occupation-normalized correlations), and the entanglement entropy measure is also confounded by the growing subsystem size. Hence the physical significance is not established by the presented data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Quantum correlations, Eq. (6), Fig. 3(a)] The suppression of G^(2)(j)_clean with Nc is not a valid measure of the claimed effect because the observable is the arithmetic mean over all clean-zone sites i, while the clean zone is initialized empty (p=0) and its total population is essentially independent of Nc (Figs. 1(b,c)). Since n_i is a projector, |G^(2)(i,j)| = |⟨n_i n_j⟩−⟨n_i⟩⟨n_j⟩| ≤ ⟨n_i⟩, so the mean over i is bounded by P_clean/Nc, which decays as 1/Nc for fixed clean-zone population even if every fixed-site correlation is unchanged. The supplemental Fig. 8 only rules out cancellation between positive and negative values; it does not test the unnormalized sum Σ_{i∈clean} G^(2)(i,j) or a fixed clean-site (e.g., i=−1) correlation. The same dilution applies to G^(3)(i,j)_clean in Eq. (8) through the average over k. Please report these controls; without them the observed 'suppression' is a definitional property of the averaging, not evidence for delocalization.
  2. [Quantum correlations, Fig. 3(b)] The entanglement entropy SA(t) in Fig. 3(b) is computed for a partition whose clean-side subsystem grows with Nc (the cut is fixed at the interface), while the total excitation number M=2 is fixed. The reduced Hilbert-space dimension of the clean subsystem grows with Nc, so a small, approximately Nc-independent leakage of population into the clean zone yields an entropy that grows roughly as ε ln Nc even if the disordered-zone physics is unchanged. The paper does not provide a control such as entropy per clean site, a fixed-size subsystem near the interface, or a comparison with a state whose disordered-zone density matrix is held fixed. Therefore the entropy increase does not independently substantiate the delocalization interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (6)] Equation (6) does not show the average explicitly; the notation G^(2)(j)_clean = G^(2)(i,j)|_{i∈clean} is ambiguous. Please write G^(2)(j)_clean = (1/Nc)Σ_{i∈clean} G^(2)(i,j), and similarly for Eq. (8).
  2. [Fig. 4] The caption of Fig. 4 uses G^(3)(i,j) while the text defines G^(3)(i,j)_clean; please unify the notation.
  3. [Excitation transport] The normalization of the half-Dicke state, √2/(√N(N−1)), should be written as (2/[N(N−1)])^{1/2} for clarity.
  4. [Supplementary Material] In the supplementary material, 'Inteli9−14900K' should read 'Intel i9-14900K'.
  5. [Fig. 3(a)] The y-axis of Fig. 3(a) is not described; please specify its definition and units (e.g., dimensionless G^(2) averaged over disorder realizations and over clean sites).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the suppression of correlations is a computed observable, not a fitted or imported result; the clean-zone averaging dilution is a correctness concern, not a circular step.

full rationale

The central claim is obtained by numerically integrating the Lindblad master equation (Eqs. 1-4) for a clean-disordered atom-nanophotonic array, with no parameters fitted to the claimed suppression. The correlation functions G(2) and G(3) (Eqs. 5-8) are standard Kubo cumulants evaluated from the simulated state; the Nc-dependence is a reported output, not an input. Self-citations (refs. 27, 45, 48, 60, 65, 66) supply background on disorder-induced localization and cumulant expansions, but the localization regime is independently demonstrated in Fig. 1, so these citations are not load-bearing, and no uniqueness theorem is imported. A non-circular correctness risk is flagged: G(2)(j)_clean in Eq. (6) averages over clean-zone sites i, and since the total clean-zone population is negligible and nearly independent of Nc (Fig. 1b,c), the mean correlation scales as ~1/Nc by normalization. The supplemental section 'Averaging of G(2)(m,m')' asserts the suppression is not an averaging artifact but only rules out sign cancellations, not this 1/Nc dilution. This weakens the physical interpretation but does not make the derivation circular, because the suppression is still a computed property of the defined observable rather than an assumption. Score 1 reflects the presence of background self-citations and the flagged artifact while confirming the derivation chain is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses standard waveguide-QED ingredients and no new particles or forces. The simulation parameters are chosen by hand to operate in the localization regime; none are fitted to experimental data. The clean zone is described as a thermal bath, but this is an interpretative role, not an invented entity.

free parameters (5)
  • disorder strength wbar/pi = 0.8
    Chosen by hand to reach the strong-disorder localization regime; not fitted.
  • interparticle spacing xi = k_s d = pi/4
    Chosen in the superradiant sector xi < pi/2 where disorder-induced localization is expected.
  • directionality D = 0
    Chosen reciprocal to avoid boundary-induced losses; main-text results use D = 0.
  • coupling efficiency beta = 1
    Assumed perfect coupling to guided modes to give a long time window for localization; beta < 1 is discussed in the supplement.
  • clean zone size Nc = 10, 15, 20, 25 for M=2; 5, 10, 15, 20 for M=3
    Scanned as the independent variable; the central claim is the trend with Nc.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The conditional pure-state Schrödinger equation (Eq. 4) with the non-Hermitian interaction matrix V faithfully represents the Lindblad dissipative dynamics for the observables computed.
    Standard approach in waveguide QED, invoked without derivation when writing Eq. (4); unconditional populations are identified with squared amplitudes of this state.
  • domain assumption Disorder is modeled as independent uniform on-site phase disorders W_mu in [-wbar, wbar] added to the atomic positions in the disordered zone.
    Standard positional-disorder model used in Eqs. (2) and (3).
  • domain assumption The regime xi < pi/2 near the superradiant sectors supports disorder-induced localization, while xi = pi or 2pi leads to subradiant or decoherence-free sectors.
    Asserted in the 'Excitation transport' section, based on prior work (refs 48, 61).
  • standard math Kubo cumulant definitions (Eqs. 5 and 7) are the appropriate measure of quantum correlations for the multi-excitation dynamics.
    Definitions taken from Kubo (ref 53) and used in prior avalanche studies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppression of Quantum Correlations in a Clean-Disordered Atom-Nanophotonic Interface." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KBES3E2E

@misc{pith2026241213524,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppression of Quantum Correlations in a Clean-Disordered Atom-Nanophotonic Interface},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KBES3E2E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13524}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum correlations are essential to the emergent behaviors of quantum systems, supporting key phenomena such as localization or delocalization of particles, quantum avalanches in many-body localized systems, and quantum information transfer. In open atom-nanophotonic systems characterized by long-range spin-exchange interactions, we examine the influence of clean system size on high-order quantum correlations among a clean-disordered atomic array with multiple atomic excitations. By initializing the system far from equilibrium, we observe a suppression of quantum correlations for localized atomic excitations in the disordered zone as the clean system size increases, showcasing the delocalization behavior in the high-order spin-exchange processes. The calculation of the entanglement entropy at the interface further substantiates this thermalizing effect. Our results manifest distinct quantum correlations enabled by long-range interactions mediated by the waveguide, enhance the theoretical comprehension of clean-disordered systems, and provide insights to nonequilibrium quantum dynamics in an atom-nanophotonic platform.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13524 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of an atomic array featuring a clean-disordered [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Time evolution of the total excitation populations in an ini [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Mean second-order correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Third-order correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Convergence analysis of disorder realizations. (a) Time evolution of the total population for the system using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of the total population under finite non-guided modes and directionality factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Back-action mechanism of population dynamics between the clean zone and the disordered zone. (a–c) Time evolution of site [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Two-dimensional plots of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Entropy per particle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Osterloh, Luigi Amico, G

    A. Osterloh, Luigi Amico, G. Falci & Rosario Fazio, Scaling of entanglement close to a quantum phase transition, Nature (London) 416, 608 (2002)

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Mishra, H

    U. Mishra, H. Cheraghi, S. Mahdavifar, R. Jafari, and A. Ak- bari, Dynamical quantum correlations after sudden quenches, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052338 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys

    A. Polkovnikov, Universal adiabatic dynamics in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Dynamics of a Quantum Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 105701 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, and P. Silvi et al ., Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg simulator, Nature (London) 568, 207 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    L ´eonard, S

    J. L ´eonard, S. Kim, M. Rispoli, A. Lukin, R. Schittko, J. Kwan, E. Demler, D. Sels, and M. Greiner, Probing the onset of quan- tum avalanches in a many-body localized system, Nat. Phys. 19, 481 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Nandkishore and D

    R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015)

    2015

  8. [8]

    J. H. Bardarson, F. Pollmann, and J. E. Moore, Unbounded Growth of Entanglement in Models of Many-Body Localiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 017202 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Agarwal, S

    K. Agarwal, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Knap, M. M ¨uller, and E. Demler, Anomalous Diffusion and Griffiths Effects Near the Many-Body Localization Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 160401 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L ¨uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. V osk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    V osk, D

    R. V osk, D. A. Huse, and E. Altman, Theory of the Many-Body Localization Transition in One-Dimensional Systems, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031032 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    J.-Y . Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V . Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimen- sions, Science 352, 1547 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Roushan, et

    P. Roushan, et. al., Spectroscopic signatures of localization with interacting photons in superconducting qubits, Science 358, 1175 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Collo- 6 quium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entangle- ment, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    D. J. Luitz, F. Huveneers, and W. D. Roeck, How a Small Quan- tum Bath Can Thermalize Long Localized Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 150602 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Thiery, F

    T. Thiery, F. Huveneers, M. M ¨uller, and W. D. Roeck, Many- Body Delocalization as a Quantum Avalanche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 140601 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Morningstar, L

    A. Morningstar, L. Colmenarez, V . Khemani, D. J. Luitz, and D. A. Huse, Avalanches and many-body resonances in many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174205 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Sels, Bath-induced delocalization in interacting disordered spin chains, Phys

    D. Sels, Bath-induced delocalization in interacting disordered spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 106, l020202 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Z. Lan, M. van Horssen, S. Powell, and J. P. Garrahan, Quan- tum Slow Relaxation and Metastability due to Dynamical Con- straints, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040603 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Khemani, M

    V . Khemani, M. Hermele, and R. Nandkishore, Localization from Hilbert space shattering: From theory to physical realiza- tions, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174204 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    P. Sala, T. Rakovszky, R. Verresen, M. Knap, and F. Pollmann, Ergodicity Breaking Arising from Hilbert Space Fragmentation in Dipole-Conserving Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011047 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Moudgalya, B

    S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quantum many-body scars and Hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 086501 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Khudorozhkov, A

    A. Khudorozhkov, A. Tiwari, C. Chamon, and T. Neupert, Hilbert space fragmentation in a 2D quantum spin system with subsystem symmetries, SciPost Phys. 13, 098 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Moudgalya and O

    S. Moudgalya and O. I. Motrunich, Hilbert Space Fragmenta- tion and Commutant Algebras, Phys. Rev. X12, 011050 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Adler, D

    D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of Hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic exci- tations in 2D, Nature (London) 636, 80 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Y . Geng, J. Tao, M. Zhao, S. Mukherjee, S. Eckel, G. K. Camp- bell, and I. B. Spielman, The Rayleigh-Taylor instability in a binary quantum fluid, arXiv:2411.19807

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Wu, K.-T Lin, I G

    C.-C. Wu, K.-T Lin, I G. N. Y . Handayana, C.-H. Chien, S. Goswami, G.-D. Lin, Y .-C. Chen, and H. H. Jen, Atomic ex- citation delocalization at the clean to disordered interface in a chirally-coupled atomic array, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013159 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lat- tices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  21. [29]

    Mitsch, C

    R. Mitsch, C. Sayrin, B. Albrecht, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum state-controlled directional sponta- neous emission of photons into a nanophotonic waveguide, Nat. Commun. 5, 5713 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeutel, P. Schneeweiss, J. V olz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature 541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, H. J. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031002 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    E. Kim, X. Zhang, V . S. Ferreira, J. Banker, J. K. Iverson, A. Sipahigil, M. Bello, A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela, M. Mirhosseini, and O. Painter, Quantum Electrodynamics in a Topological Waveg- uide, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011015 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V . Iorsh, A. V . Poshakinskiy, A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 015002 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Arcari, I

    M. Arcari, I. S ¨ollner, A. Javadi, S. Lindskov Hansen, S. Mah- moodian, J. Liu, H. Thyrrestrup, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, S. Sto- bbe, and P. Lodahl, Near-Unity Coupling Efficiency of a Quan- tum Emitter to a Photonic Crystal Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 093603 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    T. G. Tiecke, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, L. R. Liu, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom, Nature 508, 241 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Yalla, M

    R. Yalla, M. Sadgrove, K. P. Nayak, and K. Hakuta, Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics on a Nanofiber Using a Composite Photonic Crystal Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 143601 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Samutpraphoot, T

    P. Samutpraphoot, T. Dordevi ´c, P. L. Ocola, H. Bernien, C. Senko, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, Strong Coupling of Two In- dividually Controlled Atoms via a Nanophotonic Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 063602 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Dordevi ´c, P

    T. Dordevi ´c, P. Samutpraphoot, P. L. Ocola, H. Bernien, B. Grinkemeyer, I. Dimitrova, V . Vuleti´c, and M. D. Lukin, En- tanglement transport and a nanophotonic interface for atoms in optical tweezers, Science 373, 1511 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Gonz ´alez-Tudela and D

    A. Gonz ´alez-Tudela and D. Porras, Mesoscopic Entanglement Induced by Spontaneous Emission in Solid-State Quantum Op- tics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 080502 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Ramos, H

    T. Ramos, H. Pichler, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quantum Spin Dimers from Chiral Dissipation in Cold-Atom Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 237203 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Pichler, T

    H. Pichler, T. Ramos, A. J. Daley, and P. Zoller, Quantum optics of chiral spin networks, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042116 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    H. H. Jen, Bound and subradiant multiatom excitations in an atomic array with nonreciprocal couplings, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063711 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Mahmoodian, M

    S. Mahmoodian, M. ˇCepulkovskis, S. Das, P. Lodahl, K. Ham- merer, and A. S. Sørensen, Strongly Correlated Photon Trans- port in Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics with Weakly Coupled Emitters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 143601 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Le Jeannic, T

    H. Le Jeannic, T. Ramos, S. F. Simonsen, T. Pregnolato, Z. Liu, R. Schott, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, N. Rotenberg, J. J. Garc´ıa-Ripoll, and P. Lodahl, Experimental Reconstruction of the Few-Photon Nonlinear Scattering Matrix from a Single Quantum Dot in a Nanophotonic Waveguide...

    2021

  37. [45]

    H. H. Jen, Quantum correlations of localized atomic excitations in a disordered atomic chain, Phys. Rev. A105, 023717 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Chien, S

    C.-H. Chien, S. Goswami, C.-C. Wu, W.-S. Hiew, Y .-C. Chen, and H. H. Jen, Generating scalable graph states in an atom- nanophotonic interface, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 025020 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    I. M. Mirza, J. G. Hoskins, and J. C. Schotland, Chirality, band structure, and localization in waveguide quantum electrody- namics, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053804 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    H. H. Jen, Disorder-assisted excitation localization in chirally coupled quantum emitters, Phys. Rev. A 102, 043525 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Zhong, N

    J. Zhong, N. A. Olekhno, Y . Ke, A. V . Poshakinskiy, C. Lee, Y . S. Kivshar, and A. N. Poddubny, Photon-Mediated Localiza- tion in Two-Level Qubit Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 093604 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Fayard, L

    N. Fayard, L. Henriet, A. Asenjo-Garcia, and D. E. Chang, Many-body localization in waveguide quantum electrodynam- ics, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 033233 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Le Kien, S

    F. Le Kien, S. Dutta Gupta, K. P. Nayak, and K. Hakuta, Nanofiber-mediated radiative transfer between two distant atoms, Phys. Rev. A 72, 063815 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Solano, P

    P. Solano, P. Barberis-Blostein, F. K. Fatemi, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston, Super-radiance reveals infinite-range dipole in- teractions through a nanofiber, Nat. commun. 8, 1857 (2017). 7

    2017

  45. [53]

    Kubo, Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method, J

    R. Kubo, Generalized Cumulant Expansion Method, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 17, 1100-1120 (1962)

    1962

  46. [54]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in Spontaneous Radiation Processes, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  47. [55]

    H. H. Jen, Photon-mediated dipole-dipole interactions as a re- source for quantum science and technology in cold atoms, arXiv:2410.20665

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2269 (1993)

    1993

  49. [57]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cascaded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273 (1993)

    1993

  50. [58]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipative prepara- tion of entangled states in cascaded quantum-optical networks, New J. Phys. 14, 063014 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    H. H. Jen, Phase-imprinted multiphoton subradiant states, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023814 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    See supplemental material for more details on statistical con- vergence of ensemble averages, the effects of directionality and non-guided modes, back-action mechanism, averaging of second-order quantum correlations, and calculation of entropy per particle

  53. [61]

    H. H. Jen, M.-S. Chang, G.-D. Lin, and Y .-C. Chen, Subra- diance dynamics in a singly excited chirally coupled atomic chain, Phys. Rev. A 101, 023830 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Goban, C.-L

    A. Goban, C.-L. Hung, J. D. Hood, S.-P. Yu, J. A. Muniz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Superradiance for Atoms Trapped along a Photonic Crystal Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 063601 (2015)

    2015

  55. [63]

    J. S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C.-L. Hung, A. V . Gorshkov, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photon. 9, 326 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    N. V . Corzo, J. Raskop, A. Chandra, A. S. Sheremet, B. Gouraud, and J. Laurat, Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays, Nature 566, 359 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    I G. N. Y . Handayana, C.-C. Wu, S. Goswami, Y .-C. Chen, and H. H. Jen, Atomic excitation trapping in dissimilar chirally cou- pled atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 013320 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Chung, I G

    S.-H. Chung, I G. N. Y . Handayana, Y .-L. Tsao, C.-C. Wu, G.-D. Lin, and H. H. Jen, Steady-state phases and interaction- induced depletion in a driven-dissipative chirally-coupled dis- similar atomic array, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023232 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Mondal and F

    S. Mondal and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Delocalization in a par- tially disordered interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. B 109,125127 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    We are grateful for helpful discussions with Sumit Goswami, Qian-Rui Huang, and Chun-Chi Wu

    that leverage tunable long-range interactions [69] and structured environments. We are grateful for helpful discussions with Sumit Goswami, Qian-Rui Huang, and Chun-Chi Wu. We ac- knowledge support from the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), Taiwan, under the Gran...

  61. [69]

    H. H. Jen, Steady-state phase diagram of a weakly driven chiral- coupled atomic chain, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013097 (2020)

    2020

  62. [70]

    F. Xing, Y . Lu, and Z. Liao, Quantum correlation propagation in a waveguide-QED system with long-range interaction, Opt. Express 30, 22963-22973 (2022). SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FOR SUPPRESSION OF QUANTUM CORRELATIONS IN A CLEAN-DISORDER ATOM-NANOPHOTONIC INTERFACE Convergence ...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.