REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 135 references
Singular transport in non-equilibrium strongly internal-coupled 1D tilted field spin-1/2 chain
T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A spin that never touches a heat reservoir blocks steady heat flow in a longitudinal-field Ising chain and splits the chain into independent subchains, while a transverse field keeps two symmetry subspaces decoupled; the paper turns this…
desk verdict The subchain-blocking result is correct and clean, but the quantitative heat-current predictions rest on an unvalidated secular master equation in exactly the degenerate regimes the paper plots. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The carrier of the argument is the global eigen-operator structure of the Born-Markov-secular (BMS) master equation in the energy eigenbasis. In the longitudinal field the eigen-operators are not bare σ⁻ spin flips but σ⁻ dressed by the states of the neighbouring spins (Eq. 16), so a non-dissipative spin freezes its neighbours' flip channels and the rate matrix M factorizes as a direct sum (Eqs. 18-19). For the transverse field the key object is the symmetry of the transformation matrix Λ⊥ (Eq. 21), which divides the 2^N energy levels into two sets of $2^{{N-1}}$ levels with no cross-transitions, so the Hilbert space splits into two invariant subspaces. The heat-current formula (Eq. 24) then sums over these transition channels, and it is this factorization that produces both the zero-current blockade in longitudinal fields and the finite two-subspace currents in transverse fields.
What would settle it
Compute the determinant condition of Eq. (12) for a four- or five-spin chain with a non-dissipative bulk spin in a longitudinal field; if any parameter set makes det A = 0, coherences survive and Eq. (24) misses their contribution. A direct experiment would measure the heat current across a single bathless spin for several field angles and chain lengths; a non-zero current at θ = 0 with degenerate transition frequencies would show the blockade leaks exactly where the diagonal-steady-state assumption fails.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that a spin not coupled to a reservoir is a singular transport object in the longitudinal-field Ising chain. Because energy transfer in this model requires a reservoir-induced spin flip, the frozen spin's state never changes, and the global Lindblad generator factorizes: each frozen spin splits the chain into N'+1 independent subchains, with heat flow possible only inside each subchain. The two bulk spins adjacent to a frozen spin become effective nodal spins whose transition frequencies are shifted by ±J_{μ-1,μ} and ±J_{μ,μ+1}, the sign depending on whether the frozen spin is in its ground or excited state. In the transverse field, the same chain always has two decoupled symmetry subspaces whose population fractions are set by the initial state and remain constant; this holds whether or not spins are dissipative. These two behaviours give the paper its device proposal: a heat current that is identically zero when the non-dissipative spin is in a longitudinal field and finite once the field is tilted toward the transverse direction.
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that for chains longer than three spins the steady state remains diagonal in the energy eigenbasis, with all coherences decaying to zero, so the population-only equations (13) and the heat-current formula (24) are exact; the paper verifies this only for the three-spin chain, via a determinant condition in Appendix F.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- In a longitudinal field, a set of N' bathless spins turns the chain into N'+1 independent subchains, so the steady heat current through any boundary between subchains is exactly zero.
- The two spins adjacent to a frozen spin acquire effective Zeeman energies B ± J, so their thermal equilibrium populations depend on the frozen spin's ground or excited state; changing that state reconfigures the subchain's frequencies.
- In a transverse field, the system's steady state is a statistical mixture of two independent subspace steady states with weights fixed by the initial state, so initial-state preparation can set the asymptotic heat currents.
- Rotating the magnetic field direction on a single non-dissipative spin from longitudinal to transverse modulates the heat current from zero to a finite value; numerical parameters for a three-qubit superconducting implementation give a steady state within roughly 10⁻⁵ s.
- A completely symmetric two-spin chain that carries no steady current develops a non-zero heat current when one of its spins is additionally connected to a third spin, because the extra spin breaks the symmetry of the subchain frequencies.
Reading between the lines
- Inference: the same frozen-degree-of-freedom blocks-transport mechanism should appear in any chain whose coupling term is diagonal in the frozen spin's basis, not only σᶻσᶻ Ising couplings; longitudinal-field XXZ chains or star geometries with a conserved local charge are natural testbeds.
- Inference: the zero-current longitudinal state could serve as a controllable heat-valve-off setting in a larger network, with the switching speed set by the relaxation time of the subchain rather than by the frozen spin, which never relaxes.
- Inference: the transverse-field subspace splitting suggests a complementary control knob the paper does not develop: preparing the initial state with a chosen subspace weight p⊥ tunes the steady heat current continuously within a finite range, even without moving the field direction.
- Inference: because the frozen spins' states set the subchain frequencies asymmetrically, arranging different frozen-spin configurations at the two ends could yield a thermal rectifier that is non-reciprocal without any magnetic-field gradient.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper studies an N-spin Ising chain in a tilted magnetic field, with each spin coupled to an independent reservoir through a dissipative σx interaction. Using a global Born-Markov-secular (BMS) master equation, the authors claim two structural results: in the longitudinal-field (LF) case, non-dissipative spins decompose the chain into N′+1 independent subchains, shift the effective fields of their nearest neighbors by ±J, and block heat current across the frozen spins; in the transverse-field (TF) case, the Hilbert space splits into two parity sectors that remain decoupled whether or not some spins are dissipative. Based on these features, they propose a magnetically controlled heat modulator in a three-spin chain and compute heat currents for larger chains. The paper includes analytic eigen-operator decompositions, closed-form two- and three-spin steady states, and a seven-spin example in the appendices.
Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, the paper provides a simple and potentially useful mechanism for switching heat current by rotating a local magnetic field, with the structural LF subchain decomposition and TF parity-sector decomposition being clean and self-contained. The derivations are constructive and contain no fitted parameters, and the exact small-chain examples are a strength. However, the quantitative heat-current predictions for the modulator and for N>3 chains rest on an unvalidated secular master-equation treatment in parameter regimes where the paper's own degeneracy condition fails; this limits the current significance of the results and requires additional support before the claims can be regarded as established.
major comments (3)
- [II, Eq. (12) and following paragraph] The claim that all steady-state coherences vanish is not established. The text states that det[A]≠0 is required and then says this condition is "always satisfied taking the 3-spin eigen-operators in Appendix F as an example," but an N=3 example cannot prove the statement for arbitrary N. In fact, for the uniform parameter sets used in the paper, the condition can fail explicitly: in pure LF with Jμ−1,μ=Jμ,μ+1, a bulk spin has two transitions with the same frequency B−J_prev+J_next = B+J_prev−J_next, and the corresponding coefficients in Eq. (A2) are equal, so det[A]=0 in Eq. (12). This situation is not exceptional; it occurs in the plotted regimes of Figs. 5 and 6(c) with uniform B and J. The authors should either prove the non-degeneracy condition for the actual models and parameter ranges used, or explicitly analyze which plotted points satisfy it.
- [III, Eq. (24) and Appendix D] The heat-current formula (24) is derived under the assumption that the steady state is diagonal in the energy eigenbasis. Even if the diagonal of L[ρ] depends only on populations, the manuscript does not make this argument; instead it asserts that coherences vanish, which is unsupported for N>3 as noted above. Moreover, Eq. (12) treats only two transitions between four distinct levels; it does not cover degenerate channels that share an initial or final level, where coherences can feed into population dynamics. Since the populations determine the heat currents in Eq. (24), the authors need to prove that the population equations (13) are closed and correct in the degenerate and near-degenerate cases, or benchmark Eq. (24) against a non-secular or numerically exact solution at the parameter points used in Figs. 5–8.
- [IV, Fig. 6 and Fig. 7] The central quantitative claim of the paper—that a magnetic-field rotation modulates the heat current from zero (LF) to a finite value (TF)—is computed entirely within the BMS population equations for a tilted-field chain with κ2=0. No proof is given that the Liouvillian has a unique steady state independent of preparation in this configuration, and no comparison is made with a numerically exact solution or with a non-secular master equation. The same applies to the N>3 current patterns in Fig. 5, which are not covered by the analytic 3-spin appendix. The structural LF blocking statement survives these concerns, but the quantitative on-state current and the N>3 extrapolation are conditional until the BMS populations are validated in the degenerate parameter regimes actually plotted.
minor comments (5)
- [IV, Eq. (25)] In Eq. (25), the second term "cos θ σx_μ" should be "cos θ σz_μ"; as written, both transverse and longitudinal components use σx.
- [Appendix F and Table I] There are label typos in the transition-operator lists: in Model LLL the second frequency for V32 is written as ω31 instead of ω32, and in Table I the TLL row lists "V58_2, V57_2" where the last entry should presumably be "V67_2".
- [III, paragraph after Fig. 5] The sentence "For TL case, the total Hilbert space can always be divided into two decoupled subspaces" appears to mean the TF (transverse-field) case; the abbreviation TL is not defined and should be corrected.
- [Abstract and Section I] The abstract says "every spin contacts a Boson reservoir," but the main setup later includes non-dissipative spins without reservoirs; the wording should be adjusted to avoid this apparent contradiction.
- [IV, Fig. 7] The axes in Fig. 7(a) are unlabeled; please add axis labels and units so the claimed modulation range and steady-state time can be assessed.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained from the Hamiltonian and BMS master equation; the only self-citation (Ref. [122] for the TTT model) is peripheral and not load-bearing.
full rationale
The central derivation chain is self-contained. The BMS master equation (Eqs. (6)-(7)) is built directly from the declared Hamiltonian Eq. (1); the eigen-operators, population equations, and steady-state condition are computed rather than assumed. The heat-current formula Eq. (24) is derived in Appendix D from the first law and the same dissipator, not fitted to any target. The LF subchain decomposition follows from the eigen-operators of the diagonalized Hamiltonian plus the fact that a spin with no reservoir has no flip transitions, so its state is conserved; the ±J energy corrections are just the eigenfrequencies of those transitions. The TF two-subspace division follows from the symmetry of the transformation matrix Λ⊥. The modulator curves use the explicitly tabulated 3-spin eigen-systems of Appendix F with stated parameters; no parameter is fitted to produce the blocking or the on-state. The only borrowed element is the TTT model, deferred to the authors' own Ref. [122], but that case is a peripheral comparison and is not used to justify the LF/TF decomposition or the modulator; thus it is a minor non-load-bearing self-citation. The unproved generalization around Eq. (12) that coherences vanish for all N, and the unbenchmarked BMS populations in degenerate regimes, are validation and correctness risks rather than instances of circular reasoning; they do not reduce any claimed prediction to its own input by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (4)
- domain assumption The Born-Markov-secular master equation (Eq 6-10) governs the reduced dynamics of the spin chain.
- domain assumption The secular approximation is valid, i.e., all transition frequency differences are much larger than the inverse relaxation time.
- domain assumption Selected spins can be exactly decoupled from their reservoirs (κμ=0).
- domain assumption The reservoir spectral density is flat, κ(ωijμ)≡κμ.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Singular transport in non-equilibrium strongly internal-coupled 1D tilted field spin-1/2 chain." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2JNMCCM
@misc{pith2026241213814,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Singular transport in non-equilibrium strongly internal-coupled 1D tilted field spin-1/2 chain},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2JNMCCM}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13814}
}
abstract
Non-equilibrium spin-chain systems have been attracting increasing interest in energy transport. This work studies a one-dimensional non-equilibrium Ising chain immersed in a tilted magnetic field, every spin contacts a Boson reservoir with the dissipative system-environment interaction. We analytically investigate the dynamics and the steady-state energy transport taking advantage of the Born-Markov-secular master equation. In the longitudinal field, one can find that the non dissipative $N^\prime$ spins decompose the spin chain into $N^\prime +1$ independent subchains and block the heat currents from the hot end to the cool end. Moreover, for the non-dissipative $\mu$th spin, its nearest two bulk spins become the nodal spins in the subchains and have the corresponding energy correction of $\pm J_{\mu-1,\mu}$ and $\pm J_{\mu,\mu+1}$ depending on the excited/ground state of the $\mu$th spin. Therefore, a magnetically controlled heat modulator can be designed by adjusting the direction of the magnetic field in which the non-dissipative spin is located. For the transverse field case, the whole Hilbert space of the chain can always be divided into two independent subspaces regardless of whether the bulk spin is dissipative. This work provides new insight into the dynamics and energy transport of the dissipative Ising model.
Figures
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
The eigen-operators and the corre- sponding frequencies are V1 = A2(|5⟩⟨1| + |6⟩⟨2| − |7⟩⟨3| − |8⟩⟨4|), ω 1 = q B2 1 + J 2 12, V21 = A1(|3⟩⟨1| + |7⟩⟨5|), ω 21 = B2 + J23 V22 = A1(|4⟩⟨2| + |8⟩⟨6|), ω 22 = B2 − J23, V23 = −A2|7⟩⟨1|, ω 23 = Ω+ + B2, V 24 = A2|6⟩⟨4|, ω 24 = Ω+ − B2, V25 = −A2|8⟩⟨2|, ω 25 = Ω− + B2, V 26 = A2|5⟩⟨3|, ω 26 = Ω− − B2, V31 = |2⟩⟨1...
-
[2]
The state of the µth spin in S∥ 1 (or S∥
-
[3]
is ρg µ (or ρe µ). In S∥ 1, for the ( µ − 1)th or ( µ + 1)th bulk spin, which is the nearest neighbor to the µth spin, the num- ber of eigen-operator is reduced from four to two, ex- pressed as ⊗µ−3 ν=1 1 ν ⊗ ρe(g) µ−2 ⊗ σ− µ−1 ⊗ ρg µ ⊗N ν=µ+1 1 ν or ⊗µ−1 ν=1 1 ν ⊗ ρg µ ⊗ σ− µ+1 ⊗ ρe(g) µ+2 ⊗N ν=µ+3 1 ν. The correspond- ing eigen-frequencies are ( Bµ−1 − ...
-
[4]
6 (a), one can excitingly find that the heat current is blocked once the non-dissipative spin is immersed in LF
(25) According to Fig. 6 (a), one can excitingly find that the heat current is blocked once the non-dissipative spin is immersed in LF. A detailed analysis is shown in the Table I. Regardless of the magnetic field, the transition channels of the first and third spins are kept, and the dynamics of the system at κ2 = 0 can be divided into two independent pa...
-
[5]
In that case, the steady-state heat currents are blocked since the system in this condition is entirely symmetric
(B9) Suppose these two spins with the same energy are connected to the reservoirs with the same temperature. In that case, the steady-state heat currents are blocked since the system in this condition is entirely symmetric. For the dynamics of the 3-spin system M123|ρS 123⟩ = 0, where M123 = M11 ⊗ ρg 2 ⊗ 1 3 + M12 ⊗ ρe 2 ⊗ 1 3 + ρg 1 ⊗ M21 ⊗ ρg 3 + ρg 1 ⊗...
-
[6]
+ (M S3g 6e 12457 ⊗ ρg 3ρe
-
[7]
Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network,
Christine Maier, Tiff Brydges, Petar Jurcevic, Nils Trautmann, Cornelius Hempel, Ben P. Lanyon, Philipp Hauke, Rainer Blatt, and Christian F. Roos, “Environment-assisted quantum transport in a 10-qubit network,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 050501 (2019)
2019
-
[8]
+ (M S3g 6g 12457 ⊗ ρe 3ρg
Show all 135 references
-
[9]
(C2) The space formed by the third and the sixth spins is an invariant subspace
+ (MS3e 6e 12457 ⊗ ρe 3ρe 6), (C1) and the vector consisted of the populations is |ρ1234567⟩ = (|ρ S3g 6g 12457⟩ ⊗ |3g6g⟩) + (|ρ S3g 6e 12457⟩ ⊗ |3g6e⟩) + (|ρ S3e6g 12457⟩ ⊗ |3e6g⟩) + (|ρS3e 6e 12457⟩ ⊗ |3e6e⟩). (C2) The space formed by the third and the sixth spins is an inva...
-
[10]
Open-system spin transport and operator weight dissipation in spin chains,
Yongchan Yoo, Christopher David White, and Brian Swingle, “Open-system spin transport and operator weight dissipation in spin chains,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 115118 (2023)
2023
-
[11]
Quantum criticality in open quantum spin chains with nonreciprocity,
Samuel E. Begg and Ryo Hanai, “Quantum criticality in open quantum spin chains with nonreciprocity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 120401 (2024)
2024
-
[12]
Colloquium: Phononic thermal prop- erties of two-dimensional materials,
Xiaokun Gu, Yujie Wei, Xiaobo Yin, Baowen Li, and Ronggui Yang, “Colloquium: Phononic thermal prop- erties of two-dimensional materials,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 041002 (2018)
2018
-
[13]
The eigen-operators and the corre- sponding frequencies are V11 = |5⟩⟨1| + |6⟩⟨2|, ω 11 = B1 + J12, V 12 = |7⟩⟨3| + |8⟩⟨4|, ω 12 = B1 − J12, V21 = +A1(|3⟩⟨1| + |4⟩⟨2|), ω 21 = B2 + J12, V 22 = A1(|7⟩⟨5| + |8⟩⟨6|), ω 22 = B2 − J12, V23 = −A2|4⟩⟨1|, ω 23 = B2 + Ω+, V 24 = A2|3⟩⟨...
-
[14]
Openxxz spin chain: Nonequilibrium steady state and a strict bound on ballistic transport,
Toma ˇ z Prosen, “Openxxz spin chain: Nonequilibrium steady state and a strict bound on ballistic transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 217206 (2011)
2011
-
[15]
Criticality in transport through the quantum ising chain,
Malte Vogl, Gernot Schaller, and Tobias Brandes, “Criticality in transport through the quantum ising chain,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 240402 (2012)
2012
-
[16]
Variational principle for steady states of dissipative quantum many-body systems,
Hendrik Weimer, “Variational principle for steady states of dissipative quantum many-body systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 040402 (2015)
2015
-
[17]
Dissipative quantum control of a spin chain,
Giovanna Morigi, J¨ urgen Eschner, Cecilia Cormick, Yi- heng Lin, Dietrich Leibfried, and David J. Wineland, “Dissipative quantum control of a spin chain,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 200502 (2015)
2015
-
[18]
Transport in out-of-equilibrium xxz chains: Exact profiles of charges and currents,
Bruno Bertini, Mario Collura, Jacopo De Nardis, and Maurizio Fagotti, “Transport in out-of-equilibrium xxz chains: Exact profiles of charges and currents,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 207201 (2016)
2016
-
[19]
Kinetic theory of spin diffusion and superdiffusion in xxz spin chains,
Sarang Gopalakrishnan and Romain Vasseur, “Kinetic theory of spin diffusion and superdiffusion in xxz spin chains,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 127202 (2019)
2019
-
[20]
Observation of topolog- ical magnon insulator states in a superconducting cir- cuit,
W. Cai, J. Han, Feng Mei, Y. Xu, Y. Ma, X. Li, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Zheng-Yuan Xue, Zhang-Qi Yin, Suotang Jia, and Luyan Sun, “Observation of topolog- ical magnon insulator states in a superconducting cir- cuit,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 080501 (2019)
2019
-
[21]
The eigen-operators and the corresponding eigen-frequencies are V11 = +A1(|5⟩⟨1| + |8⟩⟨4|), ω 11 = 1 2 (2B1 − Ω− + Ω+), V12 = −A4(|7⟩⟨1| + |8⟩⟨2|), ω 12 = 1 2 (2B1 + Ω− + Ω+), V13 = +A1(|6⟩⟨2| + |7⟩⟨3|), ω 13 = 1 2 (2B1 + Ω− − Ω+), V14 = +A4(|5⟩⟨3| + |6⟩⟨4|), ω 14 = 1 2 (2B1 −...
-
[22]
(B8) Therefore, the steady-state currents are ˙Q2 1 = −2J12Γ12 = − ˙Q2
= −Γ1↕2e = −Γ1g2↕ = Γ1e2↕ ≡ Γ12. (B8) Therefore, the steady-state currents are ˙Q2 1 = −2J12Γ12 = − ˙Q2
-
[23]
(C5) It’s worth noting that the transition frequencies induced by the second reservoir are ω2,1(3) = (B2 − J23) − (+)J12, in J ± 2,1(3) = ±κ2n2(±ω2,1(3))
= −Γ S3g 6g 1↕2e = −Γ S3g 6g 1g2↕ = Γ S3g 6g 1e2↕ ≡ Γ S3g 6g 12 . (C5) It’s worth noting that the transition frequencies induced by the second reservoir are ω2,1(3) = (B2 − J23) − (+)J12, in J ± 2,1(3) = ±κ2n2(±ω2,1(3)). Therefore, in the LF spin chain model, the µth spin of t...
-
[24]
Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems,
Hendrik Weimer, Augustine Kshetrimayum, and Rom´ an Or´ us, “Simulation methods for open quantum many-body systems,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015008 (2021)
2021
-
[25]
Emergence of energy-avoiding and energy-seeking behaviors in nonequilibrium dissipative quantum systems,
Thiago Werlang, Maur ´ ıcio Matos, Frederico Brito, and Daniel Valente, “Emergence of energy-avoiding and energy-seeking behaviors in nonequilibrium dissipative quantum systems,” Commun. Phys. 5, 7 (2022)
2022
-
[26]
Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties,
Gabriel T. Landi, Dario Poletti, and Gernot Schaller, “Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045006 (2022)
2022
-
[27]
Materials challenges and opportu- nities for quantum computing hardware,
Nathalie P. de Leon, Kohei M. Itoh, Dohun Kim, Karan K. Mehta, Tracy E. Northup, Hanhee Paik, B. S. Palmer, N. Samarth, Sorawis Sangtawesin, and D. W. Steuerman, “Materials challenges and opportu- nities for quantum computing hardware,” Science 372, 2823 (2021)
2021
-
[28]
Energy dynamics, heat production and heat–work conversion with qubits: toward the de- velopment of quantum machines,
Liliana Arrachea, “Energy dynamics, heat production and heat–work conversion with qubits: toward the de- velopment of quantum machines,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 036501 (2023). 22
2023
-
[29]
An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions,
Julio T. Barreiro, Markus M¨ uller, Philipp Schindler, Daniel Nigg, Thomas Monz, Michael Chwalla, Markus Hennrich, Christian F. Roos, Peter Zoller, and Rainer Blatt, “An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions,” Nature 470, 486–491 (2011)
2011
-
[30]
Resource-efficient dissipative entanglement of two trapped-ion qubits,
Daniel C. Cole, Stephen D. Erickson, Giorgio Zaran- tonello, Karl P. Horn, Pan-Yu Hou, Jenny J. Wu, Daniel H. Slichter, Florentin Reiter, Christiane P. Koch, and Dietrich Leibfried, “Resource-efficient dissipative entanglement of two trapped-ion qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, ...
2022
-
[31]
Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook,
M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook,” Science 339, 1169–1174 (2013)
2013
-
[32]
Quantum information processing with su- perconducting circuits: a review,
G Wendin, “Quantum information processing with su- perconducting circuits: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017)
2017
-
[33]
Determination of the critical exponents in dissi- pative phase transitions: Coherent anomaly approach,
Jiasen Jin, Wen-Bin He, Fernando Iemini, Diego Fer- reira, Ying-Dan Wang, Stefano Chesi, and Rosario Fazio, “Determination of the critical exponents in dissi- pative phase transitions: Coherent anomaly approach,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 214301 (2021)
2021
-
[34]
Obser- vation of quantum many-body effects due to zero point fluctuations in superconducting circuits,
S´ ebastien L´ eger, Javier Puertas-Mart ´ ınez, Karthik Bharadwaj, R´ emy Dassonneville, Jovian Delaforce, Farshad Foroughi, Vladimir Milchakov, Luca Planat, Olivier Buisson, C´ ecile Naud, Wiebke Hasch-Guichard, Serge Florens, Izak Snyman, and Nicolas Roch, “Obser- vation of...
2019
-
[35]
Electric field control of radiative heat transfer in a superconducting circuit,
Olivier Maillet, Diego Subero, Joonas T Peltonen, Dmitry S Golubev, and Jukka P Pekola, “Electric field control of radiative heat transfer in a superconducting circuit,” Nat. commun. 11, 4326 (2020)
2020
-
[36]
Circuit quantum electrodynamics,
Alexandre Blais, Arne L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and Andreas Wallraff, “Circuit quantum electrodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)
2021
-
[37]
Enhancing quantum utility: Simulating large- scale quantum spin chains on superconducting quantum computers,
Talal Ahmed Chowdhury, Kwangmin Yu, Mah- mud Ashraf Shamim, M. L. Kabir, and Raza Sabbir Sufian, “Enhancing quantum utility: Simulating large- scale quantum spin chains on superconducting quantum computers,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033107 (2024)
2024
-
[38]
Antiferro- magnetic phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of rydberg atoms,
Tony E. Lee, H. H¨ affner, and M. C. Cross, “Antiferro- magnetic phase transition in a nonequilibrium lattice of rydberg atoms,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 031402 (2011)
2011
-
[39]
Dissipative transverse-field ising model: Steady-state correlations and spin squeezing,
Tony E. Lee and Ching-Kit Chan, “Dissipative transverse-field ising model: Steady-state correlations and spin squeezing,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 063811 (2013)
2013
-
[40]
Driven- dissipative ising model: Mean-field solution,
G. Goldstein, C. Aron, and C. Chamon, “Driven- dissipative ising model: Mean-field solution,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 174418 (2015)
2015
-
[41]
Metastability in an open quantum ising model,
Dominic C. Rose, Katarzyna Macieszczak, Igor Lesanovsky, and Juan P. Garrahan, “Metastability in an open quantum ising model,” Phys. Rev. E94, 052132 (2016)
2016
-
[42]
Multicrit- ical behavior in dissipative ising models,
Vincent R. Overbeck, Mohammad F. Maghrebi, Alexey V. Gorshkov, and Hendrik Weimer, “Multicrit- ical behavior in dissipative ising models,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 042133 (2017)
2017
-
[43]
Spin models, dynamics, and criticality with atoms in tilted optical superlattices,
Anton S. Buyskikh, Luca Tagliacozzo, Dirk Schuricht, Chris A. Hooley, David Pekker, and Andrew J. Da- ley, “Spin models, dynamics, and criticality with atoms in tilted optical superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090401 (2019)
2019
-
[44]
Dissipative quantum ising chain as a non-hermitian ashkin-teller model,
Naoyuki Shibata and Hosho Katsura, “Dissipative quantum ising chain as a non-hermitian ashkin-teller model,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 224432 (2019)
2019
-
[45]
Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field ising model,
Nicolai Lang and Hans Peter B¨ uchler, “Entanglement transition in the projective transverse field ising model,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 094204 (2020)
2020
-
[46]
Properties of the random-field ising model in a transverse magnetic field,
T. Senthil, “Properties of the random-field ising model in a transverse magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. B 57, 8375– 8380 (1998). 23
1998
-
[47]
Driven- dissipative ising model: An exact field-theoretical anal- ysis,
Daniel A. Paz and Mohammad F. Maghrebi, “Driven- dissipative ising model: An exact field-theoretical anal- ysis,” Phys. Rev. A 104, 023713 (2021)
2021
-
[48]
Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,
Xhek Turkeshi, Alberto Biella, Rosario Fazio, Marcello Dalmonte, and Marco Schir´ o, “Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 224210 (2021)
2021
-
[49]
Driven- dissipative ising model: Dynamical crossover at weak dissipation,
Daniel A. Paz and Mohammad F. Maghrebi, “Driven- dissipative ising model: Dynamical crossover at weak dissipation,” EPL 136, 10002 (2022)
2022
-
[50]
Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain,
Emanuele Tirrito, Alessandro Santini, Rosario Fazio, and Mario Collura, “Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum Ising chain,” SciPost Phys. 15, 096 (2023)
2023
-
[51]
Numerical simula- tion of long-range open quantum many-body dynamics with tree tensor networks,
Dominik Sulz, Christian Lubich, Gianluca Ceruti, Igor Lesanovsky, and Federico Carollo, “Numerical simula- tion of long-range open quantum many-body dynamics with tree tensor networks,” Phys. Rev. A 109, 022420 (2024)
2024
-
[52]
Nonequilibrium phase transition in a dilute rydberg ensemble,
C. Carr, R. Ritter, C. G. Wade, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, “Nonequilibrium phase transition in a dilute rydberg ensemble,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 113901 (2013)
2013
-
[53]
Full counting statistics and phase diagram of a dissipative rydberg gas,
N. Malossi, M. M. Valado, S. Scotto, P. Huillery, P. Pil- let, D. Ciampini, E. Arimondo, and O. Morsch, “Full counting statistics and phase diagram of a dissipative rydberg gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023006 (2014)
2014
-
[54]
Bistability versus metastability in driven dissipative rydberg gases,
F. Letscher, O. Thomas, T. Niederpr¨ um, M. Fleis- chhauer, and H. Ott, “Bistability versus metastability in driven dissipative rydberg gases,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 021020 (2017)
2017
-
[55]
Solvable family of driven-dissipative many-body sys- tems,
Michael Foss-Feig, Jeremy T. Young, Victor V. Albert, Alexey V. Gorshkov, and Mohammad F. Maghrebi, “Solvable family of driven-dissipative many-body sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 190402 (2017)
2017
-
[56]
Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of rydberg atoms,
Pascal Scholl, Michael Schuler, Hannah J. Williams, Alexander A. Eberharter, and Antoine Browaeys, “Quantum simulation of 2d antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of rydberg atoms,” Nature 595, 233–238 (2021)
2021
-
[57]
Emergence of subharmonics in a microwave driven dissipative rydberg gas,
Zong-Kai Liu, Kong-Hao Sun, Albert Cabot, Federico Carollo, Jun Zhang, Zheng-Yuan Zhang, Li-Hua Zhang, Bang Liu, Tian-Yu Han, Qing Li, Yu Ma, Han-Chao Chen, Igor Lesanovsky, Dong-Sheng Ding, and Bao-Sen Shi, “Emergence of subharmonics in a microwave driven dissipative rydberg ...
2024
-
[58]
Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and fu- ture challenges,
Benedikt Fauseweh, “Quantum many-body simulations on digital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and fu- ture challenges,” Nat. Commun. 15, 2123 (2024)
2024
-
[59]
Exact solution of the infinite-range dissipative transverse-field ising model,
David Roberts and A. A. Clerk, “Exact solution of the infinite-range dissipative transverse-field ising model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 190403 (2023)
2023
-
[60]
Multicritical behavior of the two-dimensional transverse ising metamagnet in a longitudinal magnetic field,
Denise A. do Nascimento, Josefa T. Pacobahyba, Mi- nos A. Neto, Octavio D. Rodriguez Salmon, and J.A. Plascak, “Multicritical behavior of the two-dimensional transverse ising metamagnet in a longitudinal magnetic field,” Physica A 474, 224–229 (2017)
2017
-
[61]
Real time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model,
Marton Kormos, Mario Collura, Gabor Tak´ acs, and Pasquale Calabrese, “Real time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model,” Nat. Phys. 13, 246–249 (2017)
2017
-
[62]
Ground-state properties of the one-dimensional trans- verse ising model in a longitudinal magnetic field,
O. F. D. A. Bonfim, B. Boechat, and J. Florencio, “Ground-state properties of the one-dimensional trans- verse ising model in a longitudinal magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. E 99, 012122 (2019)
2019
-
[63]
Open ising model per- turbed by classical colored noise,
Deshui Yu and Rainer Dumke, “Open ising model per- turbed by classical colored noise,” Phys. Rev. A 100, 022124 (2019)
2019
-
[64]
Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations,
Paolo Pietro Mazza, Gabriele Perfetto, Alessio Lerose, Mario Collura, and Andrea Gambassi, “Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 180302 (2019)
2019
-
[65]
Dynamics of longitudinal magnetization in transverse-field quan- tum ising model: from symmetry-breaking gap to kib- ble–zurek mechanism,
Micha l Bia lo´ nczyk and Bogdan Damski, “Dynamics of longitudinal magnetization in transverse-field quan- tum ising model: from symmetry-breaking gap to kib- ble–zurek mechanism,” J. Stat. Mech. 2020, 013108 (2020)
2020
-
[66]
A simple tensor network algorithm for two-dimensional steady states,
Augustine Kshetrimayum, Hendrik Weimer, and Rom´ an Or´ us, “A simple tensor network algorithm for two-dimensional steady states,” Nat. Commun. 8, 1291 (2017)
2017
-
[67]
Cascade of sin- gularities in the spin dynamics of a perturbed quantum critical ising chain,
Xiao Wang, Haiyuan Zou, Krist´ of H´ ods´ agi, M´ arton Ko- rmos, G´ abor Tak´ acs, and Jianda Wu, “Cascade of sin- gularities in the spin dynamics of a perturbed quantum critical ising chain,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 235117 (2021)
2021
-
[68]
Global sensing and its impact for quantum many-body probes with criticality,
Victor Montenegro, Utkarsh Mishra, and Abolfazl Bayat, “Global sensing and its impact for quantum many-body probes with criticality,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 200501 (2021)
2021
-
[69]
Prethermalization in one-dimensional quantum many-body systems with confinement,
Stefan Birnkammer, Alvise Bastianello, and Michael Knap, “Prethermalization in one-dimensional quantum many-body systems with confinement,” Nat. Commun. 13, 7663 (2022)
2022
-
[70]
Entanglement dynamics in confining spin chains,
Stefano Scopa, Pasquale Calabrese, and Alvise Bas- tianello, “Entanglement dynamics in confining spin chains,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 125413 (2022)
2022
-
[71]
Bridging quantum many-body scars and quantum integrability in ising chains with transverse and longitudinal fields,
Cheng Peng and Xiaoling Cui, “Bridging quantum many-body scars and quantum integrability in ising chains with transverse and longitudinal fields,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 214311 (2022)
2022
-
[72]
Thermal kosterlitz–thouless tran- sitions in the 1/r2 long-range ferromagnetic quantum ising chain revisited,
Stephan Humeniuk, “Thermal kosterlitz–thouless tran- sitions in the 1/r2 long-range ferromagnetic quantum ising chain revisited,” J. Stat. Mech. 2020, 063105 (2020)
2020
-
[73]
Magnetic bloch oscillations in a non-hermitian quantum ising chain,
K. L. Zhang and Z. Song, “Magnetic bloch oscillations in a non-hermitian quantum ising chain,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 104312 (2024)
2024
-
[74]
Simulating the transverse-field ising model on the kagome lattice us- ing a programmable quantum annealer,
Pratyankara Narasimhan, Stephan Humeniuk, Ananda Roy, and Victor Drouin-Touchette, “Simulating the transverse-field ising model on the kagome lattice us- ing a programmable quantum annealer,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 054432 (2024)
2024
-
[75]
Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations,
Wenyuan Xiao, Wenqiong Zhang, Longhui Shen, Jia Bao, and Andrea Gambassi, “Suppression of transport in nondisordered quantum spin chains due to confined excitations,” Quantum Inf. Process. 23, 347 (2024)
2024
-
[76]
Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice,
Jonathan Simon, Waseem S Bakr, Ruichao Ma, M Eric Tai, Philipp M Preiss, and Markus Greiner, “Quantum simulation of antiferromagnetic spin chains in an optical lattice,” Nature 472, 307–312 (2011)
2011
-
[77]
Dissipation-induced order: The s = 1/2 quantum spin chain coupled to an ohmic bath,
Manuel Weber, David J. Luitz, and Fakher F. Assaad, “Dissipation-induced order: The s = 1/2 quantum spin chain coupled to an ohmic bath,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 056402 (2022)
2022
-
[78]
Bath-engineering magnetic order in quantum spin chains: An analytic mapping approach,
Brett Min, Nicholas Anto-Sztrikacs, Marlon Brenes, and Dvira Segal, “Bath-engineering magnetic order in quantum spin chains: An analytic mapping approach,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 266701 (2024)
2024
-
[79]
Nanowelding of quantum spin-1 2 chains at minimal dissipation,
Moallison F. Cavalcante, Marcus V. S. Bonan¸ ca, Ed- uardo Miranda, and Sebastian Deffner, “Nanowelding of quantum spin-1 2 chains at minimal dissipation,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 064304 (2024)
2024
-
[80]
Many-body open quantum systems,
Rosario Fazio, Jonathan Keeling, Leonardo Mazza, and Marco Schir` o, “Many-body open quantum systems,” (2024), arXiv:2409.10300 [quant-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[81]
Open quan- tum systems – a brief introduction,
Fabrizio Minganti and Alberto Biella, “Open quan- tum systems – a brief introduction,” (2024), arXiv:2407.16855 [quant-ph]
2024
-
[82]
Monte carlo simulations of dissipative quantum ising models,
Iver Bakken Sperstad, Einar B. Stiansen, and Asle Sudbø, “Monte carlo simulations of dissipative quantum ising models,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 104302 (2010)
2010
-
[83]
Quantum-critical properties of the long-range transverse-field ising model from quantum monte carlo simulations,
Jan Alexander Koziol, Anja Langheld, Sebastian C. Kapfer, and Kai Phillip Schmidt, “Quantum-critical properties of the long-range transverse-field ising model from quantum monte carlo simulations,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 245135 (2021)
2021
-
[84]
Complete replica solution for the transverse field sherrington-kirkpatrick spin glass model with continuous-time quantum monte carlo method,
Annam´ aria Kiss, Gergely Zar´ and, and Izabella Lo- vas, “Complete replica solution for the transverse field sherrington-kirkpatrick spin glass model with continuous-time quantum monte carlo method,” Phys. Rev. B 109, 024431 (2024)
2024
-
[85]
Local versus global mas- ter equation with common and separate baths: superi- ority of the global approach in partial secular approxi- mation,
Marco Cattaneo, Gian Luca Giorgi, Sabrina Manis- calco, and Roberta Zambrini, “Local versus global mas- ter equation with common and separate baths: superi- ority of the global approach in partial secular approxi- mation,” New J. Phys. 21, 113045 (2019)
2019
-
[86]
Spin dynamics of the generalized quantum spin com- pass chain,
Pontus Laurell, Gonzalo Alvarez, and Elbio Dagotto, “Spin dynamics of the generalized quantum spin com- pass chain,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 104414 (2023)
2023
-
[87]
Critical phase in- duced by berry phase and dissipation in a spin chain,
Simon Martin and Tarun Grover, “Critical phase in- duced by berry phase and dissipation in a spin chain,” Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043270 (2023)
2023
-
[88]
Tensor network sim- ulation of multi-environmental open quantum dynam- ics via machine learning and entanglement renormalisa- tion,
Florian Schrder, David Turban, Andrew Musser, Nicholas Hine, and Alex Chin, “Tensor network sim- ulation of multi-environmental open quantum dynam- ics via machine learning and entanglement renormalisa- tion,” Nat. Commun. 10, 1062 (2019)
2019
-
[89]
Cluster mean-field approach to the steady- state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems,
Jiasen Jin, Alberto Biella, Oscar Viyuela, Leonardo Mazza, Jonathan Keeling, Rosario Fazio, and Davide Rossini, “Cluster mean-field approach to the steady- state phase diagram of dissipative spin systems,” Phys. Rev. X 6, 031011 (2016)
2016
-
[90]
Quantum spin liquids bootstrapped from ising criticality in rydberg arrays,
Kevin Slagle, Yue Liu, David Aasen, Hannes Pichler, Roger S. K. Mong, Xie Chen, Manuel Endres, and Ja- son Alicea, “Quantum spin liquids bootstrapped from ising criticality in rydberg arrays,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 115122 (2022)
2022
-
[91]
Phase dia- gram of the dissipative quantum ising model on a square lattice,
Jiasen Jin, Alberto Biella, Oscar Viyuela, Cristiano Ciuti, Rosario Fazio, and Davide Rossini, “Phase dia- gram of the dissipative quantum ising model on a square lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 241108(R) (2018)
2018
-
[92]
Universal lind- 24 blad equation for open quantum systems,
Frederik Nathan and Mark S. Rudner, “Universal lind- 24 blad equation for open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 115109 (2020)
2020
-
[93]
Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione, The the- ory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press on Demand, 2002)
2002
-
[94]
A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation,
Daniel Manzano, “A short introduction to the Lindblad master equation,” AIP Advances 10, 025106 (2020)
2020
-
[95]
The local approach to quantum transport may violate the second law of thermodynamics,
Amikam Levy and Ronnie Kosloff, “The local approach to quantum transport may violate the second law of thermodynamics,” EPL 107, 20004 (2014)
2014
-
[96]
Markovian master equa- tions for quantum thermal machines: local versus global approach,
Patrick P Hofer, Mart ´ ı Perarnau-Llobet, L David M Miranda, G´ eraldine Haack, Ralph Silva, Jonatan Bohr Brask, and Nicolas Brunner, “Markovian master equa- tions for quantum thermal machines: local versus global approach,” New J. Phys. 19, 123037 (2017)
2017
-
[97]
Perfect diode in quantum spin chains,
Vinitha Balachandran, Giuliano Benenti, Emmanuel Pereira, Giulio Casati, and Dario Poletti, “Perfect diode in quantum spin chains,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200603 (2018)
2018
-
[98]
Quantum thermal transistor in superconducting circuits,
Marco Majland, Kasper Sangild Christensen, and Niko- laj Thomas Zinner, “Quantum thermal transistor in superconducting circuits,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 184510 (2020)
2020
-
[99]
Quantum thermodynamically consistent lo- cal master equations,
Adam Hewgill, Gabriele De Chiara, and Alberto Im- parato, “Quantum thermodynamically consistent lo- cal master equations,” Phys. Rev. Research 3, 013165 (2021)
2021
-
[100]
Transport and spectral properties of the xx + xxz diode and stability to dephasing,
Kang Hao Lee, Vinitha Balachandran, Chu Guo, and Dario Poletti, “Transport and spectral properties of the xx + xxz diode and stability to dephasing,” Phys. Rev. E 105, 024120 (2022)
2022
-
[101]
Perfect thermal rectification in a many-body quantum ising model,
Emmanuel Pereira, “Perfect thermal rectification in a many-body quantum ising model,” Phys. Rev. E 99, 032116 (2019)
2019
-
[102]
Quantum thermal transistor,
Karl Joulain, J´ er´ emie Drevillon, Youn` es Ezzahri, and Jose Ordonez-Miranda, “Quantum thermal transistor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 200601 (2016)
2016
-
[103]
Optically controlled quantum thermal gate,
Ravi T. Wijesekara, Sarath D. Gunapala, Mark I. Stock- man, and Malin Premaratne, “Optically controlled quantum thermal gate,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 245402 (2020)
2020
-
[104]
Quan- tum thermal transistors: Operation characteristics in steady state versus transient regimes,
Riddhi Ghosh, Ahana Ghoshal, and Ujjwal Sen, “Quan- tum thermal transistors: Operation characteristics in steady state versus transient regimes,” Phys. Rev. A 103, 052613 (2021)
2021
-
[105]
Influence of dissi- pation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,
A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Influence of dissi- pation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211–214 (1981)
1981
-
[106]
Dy- namics of the dissipative two-state system,
A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, Matthew P. A. Fisher, Anupam Garg, and W. Zwerger, “Dy- namics of the dissipative two-state system,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1–85 (1987)
1987
-
[107]
Testing the validity of the ‘local’ and ‘global’ gkls mas- ter equations on an exactly solvable model,
J. Onam Gonz´ alez, Luis A. Correa, Giorgio Nocerino, Jos´ e P. Palao, Daniel Alonso, and Gerardo Adesso, “Testing the validity of the ‘local’ and ‘global’ gkls mas- ter equations on an exactly solvable model,” Open Sys. Information Dyn. 24, 1740010 (2017)
2017
-
[108]
Signa- ture of topology via heat transfer analysis in the su–schrieffer–heeger (ssh) model,
Vipul Upadhyay, M Tahir Naseem, ¨Ozg¨ ur E M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, and Rahul Marathe, “Signa- ture of topology via heat transfer analysis in the su–schrieffer–heeger (ssh) model,” New J. Phys. 26, 013014 (2024)
2024
-
[109]
Model- ing heat transport through completely positive maps,
Hannu Wichterich, Markus J. Henrich, Heinz-Peter Breuer, Jochen Gemmer, and Mathias Michel, “Model- ing heat transport through completely positive maps,” Phys. Rev. E 76, 031115 (2007)
2007
-
[110]
Quan- tum thermal diode dominated by pure classical correla- tion via three triangular-coupled qubits,
Yi-jia Yang, Yu-qiang Liu, and Chang-shui Yu, “Quan- tum thermal diode dominated by pure classical correla- tion via three triangular-coupled qubits,” Phys. Rev. E 107, 064125 (2023)
2023
-
[111]
Superconducting qubit circuit em- ulation of a vector spin-1/2,
Andrew J Kerman, “Superconducting qubit circuit em- ulation of a vector spin-1/2,” New J. Phys. 21, 073030 (2019)
2019
-
[112]
Heat trans- port through a two-level system embedded between two harmonic resonators,
Tsuyoshi Yamamoto and Takeo Kato, “Heat trans- port through a two-level system embedded between two harmonic resonators,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 395303 (2021)
2021
-
[113]
Photonic heat transport in three terminal supercon- ducting circuit,
Azat Gubaydullin, George Thomas, Dmitry S. Golubev, Dmitrii Lvov, Joonas T. Peltonen, and Jukka P. Pekola, “Photonic heat transport in three terminal supercon- ducting circuit,” Nat. Commun. 13, 1552 (2022)
2022
-
[114]
Single-electron thermal devices coupled to a mesoscopic gate,
Rafael S´ anchez, Holger Thierschmann, and Laurens W Molenkamp, “Single-electron thermal devices coupled to a mesoscopic gate,” New J. Phys. 19, 113040 (2017)
2017
-
[115]
Photonic thermal diode based on superconduc- tors,
Jose Ordonez-Miranda, Karl Joulain, Domingos De Sousa Meneses, Youn` es Ezzahri, and J´ er´ emie Dre- villon, “Photonic thermal diode based on superconduc- tors,” J. Appl. Phys. 122, 093105 (2017)
2017
-
[116]
Heat rectification via a superconducting artifi- cial atom,
Jorden Senior, Azat Gubaydullin, Bayan Karimi, Joonas T Peltonen, Joachim Ankerhold, and Jukka P Pekola, “Heat rectification via a superconducting artifi- cial atom,” Commun. Phys. 3, 40 (2020)
2020
-
[117]
The qutrit as a heat diode and circulator,
Israel D ´ ıaz and Rafael S´ anchez, “The qutrit as a heat diode and circulator,” New J. Phys. 23, 125006 (2021)
2021
-
[118]
Quantum heat valve and entanglement in su- perconducting lc resonators,
Yu-qiang Liu, Yi-jia Yang, Ting-ting Ma, and Chang- shui Yu, “Quantum heat valve and entanglement in su- perconducting lc resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 144002 (2023)
2023
-
[119]
Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits,
Xiu Gu, Anton Frisk Kockum, Adam Miranowicz, Yu xi Liu, and Franco Nori, “Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits,” Phys. Rep. 718- 719, 1–102 (2017), microwave photonics with supercon- ducting quantum circuits
2017
-
[120]
Quantum-state engineering with josephson-junction devices,
Yuriy Makhlin, Gerd Sch¨ on, and Alexander Shnirman, “Quantum-state engineering with josephson-junction devices,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 357–400 (2001)
2001
-
[121]
Joseph- son persistent-current qubit,
J. E. Mooij, T. P. Orlando, L. Levitov, Lin Tian, Caspar H. van der Wal, and Seth Lloyd, “Joseph- son persistent-current qubit,” Science 285, 1036–1039 (1999)
1999
-
[122]
Charge- insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box,
Jens Koch, Terri M. Yu, Jay Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, Alexandre Blais, M. H. De- voret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Charge- insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box,” Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007)
2007
-
[123]
(B12) Therefore, the steady-state heat currents are ˙Q3 1 = ˙Q3 3 = − 1 2 ˙Q3 2 = −2J(Γ1 123 + Γ2 123). (B13) Equation (B13) also shows that when the system is completely symmetric, the heat currents that flow into the system from two nodal spins are equal and flow out togethe...
-
[124]
Cooper-pair box coupled to two resonators: An architecture for a quantum refrigerator,
Andrew Guthrie, Christoforus Dimas Satrya, Yu-Cheng Chang, Paul Menczel, Franco Nori, and Jukka P. Pekola, “Cooper-pair box coupled to two resonators: An architecture for a quantum refrigerator,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 064022 (2022)
2022
-
[125]
Demonstration of a nonstoquastic hamil- tonian in coupled superconducting flux qubits,
I. Ozfidan, C. Deng, A.Y. Smirnov, T. Lanting, R. Har- ris, L. Swenson, J. Whittaker, F. Altomare, M. Bab- 25 cock, C. Baron, A.J. Berkley, K. Boothby, H. Christiani, P. Bunyk, C. Enderud, B. Evert, M. Hager, A. Ha- jda, J. Hilton, S. Huang, E. Hoskinson, M.W. John- son, K. Jo...
2020
-
[126]
Three-josephson junctions flux qubit couplings,
Mar ´ ıa Hita-P´ erez, Gabriel Jaum` a, Manuel Pino, and Juan Jos´ e Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, “Three-josephson junctions flux qubit couplings,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 222601 (2021)
2021
-
[127]
Spectroscopy on two coupled superconducting flux qubits,
J. B. Majer, F. G. Paauw, A. C. J. ter Haar, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, “Spectroscopy on two coupled superconducting flux qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 090501 (2005)
2005
-
[128]
Engineered dissipation for quantum informa- tion science,
Patrick M. Harrington, Erich J. Mueller, and Kater W. Murch, “Engineered dissipation for quantum informa- tion science,” Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 660–671 (2022)
2022
-
[129]
Magnetic order in the quasi-one-dimensional ising system RbCocl 3,
N. P. H¨ anni, D. Sheptyakov, M. Mena, E. Hirtenlech- ner, L. Keller, U. Stuhr, L.-P. Regnault, M. Medarde, A. Cervellino, Ch. R¨ uegg, B. Normand, and K. W. Kr¨ amer, “Magnetic order in the quasi-one-dimensional ising system RbCocl 3,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 094424 (2021)
2021
-
[130]
Ex- perimental observation of phase transitions in spatial photonic ising machine,
Yisheng Fang, Junyi Huang, and Zhichao Ruan, “Ex- perimental observation of phase transitions in spatial photonic ising machine,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043902 (2021)
2021
-
[131]
Quantum phase transition in a quantum ising chain at nonzero temperatures,
K. L. Zhang and Z. Song, “Quantum phase transition in a quantum ising chain at nonzero temperatures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 116401 (2021)
2021
-
[132]
Emergent phase transitions in a cluster ising model with dissipation,
Zheng-Xin Guo, Xue-Jia Yu, Xi-Dan Hu, and Zhi Li, “Emergent phase transitions in a cluster ising model with dissipation,” Phys. Rev. A 105, 053311 (2022)
2022
-
[133]
Understanding the quantum rabi ring us- ing analogies to quantum magnetism,
Diego Fallas Padilla, Han Pu, Guo-Jing Cheng, and Yu- Yu Zhang, “Understanding the quantum rabi ring us- ing analogies to quantum magnetism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 183602 (2022)
2022
-
[134]
Observing a phase transition in a coherent ising machine,
Hiroki Takesue, Yasuhiro Yamada, Kensuke Inaba, Takuya Ikuta, Yuya Yonezu, Takahiro Inagaki, Toshi- mori Honjo, Takushi Kazama, Koji Enbutsu, Takeshi Umeki, and Ryoichi Kasahara, “Observing a phase transition in a coherent ising machine,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, L031001 (2023)
2023
-
[135]
Magnetically controlled quantum thermal devices via three nearest-neighbor coupled spin-1/2 systems,
Yi-jia Yang, Yu-qiang Liu, Zheng Liu, and Chang-shui Yu, “Magnetically controlled quantum thermal devices via three nearest-neighbor coupled spin-1/2 systems,” Phys. Rev. E 109, 014142 (2024)
2024
Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.