Local enhancement of the mean-field approximation for bosons

Jingxuan Zhang; Marius Lemm; Simone Rademacher

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Local enhancement of the mean-field approximation for bosons

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For bosons on a lattice, the mean-field approximation error in a local observable decays faster than any power of the distance from the initial condensate, for times up to that distance divided by a finite velocity.

desk verdict Genuinely new local refinement of the mean-field program with a clean ASTLO adaptation, but the main theorem leans on an unproved ballistic bound imported from an author's preprint. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13868 v1 pith:MT62FJ7F submitted 2024-12-18 math-ph math.APmath.MP

Marius Lemm , Simone Rademacher , Jingxuan Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q5581V7082C10

keywords mean-fieldapproximationBose-EinsteincondensatelatticebosonspropagationboundLieb-RobinsonHartreeequationfluctuationdynamicsadiabaticspacetimelocalizationobservable

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how accurately a Bose-Einstein condensate evolving under the many-body Schrödinger equation on a lattice is described by the single-particle Hartree equation. The global mean-field error is known to be of order 1/N, but the paper shows that the error is much smaller in spatial regions far from the initial condensate: for every integer n, the error in a local observable at distance ρ is O($ρ^{{-n}}$) for times t ≤ ρ/v, where v is an order-1 velocity. This local enhancement is derived from new ballistic propagation bounds on the fluctuations around the condensate, which say that the number of excitations inside a ball at distance ρ stays O($ρ^{{-n}}$) over those times. The method is a variant of the adiabatic spacetime localization observable (ASTLO) technique adapted to the particle non-conserving generator of the fluctuation dynamics. If correct, the result shows that information about the condensate shape travels at finite speed and that local measurements far from the condensate are described by Hartree dynamics to extreme precision.

What carries the argument

The key object is the fluctuation dynamics W_N(t;s) on the truncated Fock space of excitations orthogonal to the Hartree state, whose generator L_N(t) contains non-particle-conserving quadratic terms of the form b^*b^* and bb. The paper adapts the adiabatic spacetime localization observable (ASTLO) method to this generator: it constructs smoothed spatial cutoffs f((R−v′t−|x|)/s) that move inward at a velocity v′ and proves a differential inequality showing that these observables decay except for small remainders. A Grönwall bootstrap and an induction in the parameter n convert the differential inequality into a local estimate on the excitation number in a ball, and the dispersive estimate (DE), which states that ∫₀ᵗ ‖φ_s‖_∞ ds ≤ c‖φ₀‖₁, controls the time integrals of the Hartree solution. A ballistic upper bound for the nonlinear Schrödinger flow, taken as a black box, keeps the condensate away from the probed ball over the relevant times.

What would settle it

A direct numerical simulation of the lattice nonlinear Schrödinger equation (1.5) in d = 3 at small λ, measuring ∫₀ᵗ ‖φ_s‖_∞ ds for times up to the claimed T = exp(1/√|λ|) − 1, would verify whether the dispersive assumption actually holds; a violation for t < T would falsify the assumption. Alternatively, compute the mean-field error for a local observable in a ball at distance ρ for times t slightly exceeding ρ/v; if the error grows as a power of N rather than remaining O($ρ^{{-n}}$), the local enhancement bound fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mean-field approximation is locally enhanced by arbitrary polynomial factors in the distance from the initial condensate. Concretely, if the initial condensate wave function φ₀ vanishes on a ball of radius r+ρ and the observable O is supported in the ball of radius r, then for every integer n ≥ 1 the error |Tr((γ_{ψ_{N,t}}/N − |φ_t⟩⟨φ_t|)O)| is bounded by C‖O‖_op $ρ^{{-n}}$ for all times t ≤ ρ/v, where v > 4d is a state-independent velocity and C depends only on n, v, d, |λ|, the dispersive constant c, and the ℓ¹ norm of φ₀. The proof shows the same for the local fluctuation number: ⟨ψ_{N,t}, N⁺_{B_r}(t)ψ_{N,t}⟩ ≤ C $ρ^{{-n}}$ for t ≤ ρ/v, assuming the initial state has no fluctuations near B_r. These bounds are the first of their kind for the particle non-conserving generator of fluctuations around a Hartree state.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result depends on the dispersive estimate (DE): the Hartree solution φ_t must satisfy ∫₀ᵗ ‖φ_s‖_∞ ds ≤ c ‖φ_0‖₁ for all times up to the ones considered, and this is only proven here for small interaction strength |λ| (and in dimension 3 only up to a large but finite time).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For t ≤ ρ/v, any bounded local observable supported at distance ρ from the initial condensate is described by the Hartree evolution up to an error O(ρ^{-n}) for every n, which is far better than the global O(1/N) bound.
Fluctuations around the condensate propagate at most at a finite speed v; the local number of excitations in a ball at distance ρ stays O(ρ^{-n}) for times up to ρ/v.
Because the bound holds for every n simultaneously, the local error is rapidly decreasing in ρ, not merely suppressed by one fixed power.
Without the dispersive assumption (DE), the same argument yields a bound Ce^{C|λ|t}ρ^{-n}, so spatial locality persists but with exponential time growth.
The method extends to initial states that are not pure condensates, provided the initial fluctuations are localized away from the probed region.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural testable extension is to check numerically on a lattice whether the O(ρ^{-n}) local enhancement persists for times longer than ρ/v or for interactions beyond the small-|λ| regime; the proof suggests the finite-speed propagation should break down at a scale set by the discrete Schrödinger group velocity.
The result implies that local entanglement generation between distant regions is suppressed for times up to ρ/v, connecting to Lieb-Robinson-type bounds for bosonic systems in the mean-field scaling.
Since the error depends on ‖φ₀‖_{ℓ¹}, condensates that are more spread out (larger ℓ¹ norm for fixed ℓ² norm) have weaker enhancement; one could investigate whether an ℓ²-based assumption suffices.
The ASTLO adaptation to non-particle-conserving generators may apply to other quadratic fluctuation generators, such as Bogoliubov dynamics on lattices, giving ballistic propagation bounds for quasiparticles.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper delivers what it promises: a rigorous local enhancement of the mean-field approximation for lattice bosons, with the error at distance ρ improved to ρ^{-n} for any n up to time t ≤ ρ/v. The core idea—adapting the ASTLO machinery to the particle non-conserving generator of the fluctuation dynamics—is a real novelty, and the local fluctuation bounds in Theorem 1.2 are not consequences of the known global N^{-1} results. The proof is careful, well organized, and the assumptions are stated plainly. The paper also does the reader the courtesy of explaining when the dispersive estimate (DE) is actually available (small coupling, d ≥ 4 globally, d = 3 up to an exponentially large time), with a sensible remark that the short-time regime is the relevant one.

The main soft spot is exactly what the stress-test flags: Theorem 5.2, the ballistic upper bound for the nonlinear Schrödinger flow, is imported from the unpublished preprint [Zha24b] and not proved here. This bound is load-bearing—it controls the moving condensate support in the proofs of Theorem 5.1 and Theorem 1.1. Without it, the claimed ρ^{-n} enhancement does not follow. The citation is honest and the statement is explicit, but for a self-contained paper this is a gap. A referee would reasonably ask either for a proof of Theorem 5.2 in an appendix or for a precise statement of the hypotheses and constants from [Zha24b] so the dependency is fully visible. This is a revision request, not a reason to reject—the bound itself is plausible and the rest of the argument hangs together.

There are also minor issues: the typo in assumption (1.16) (missing angle bracket) and the fact that (DE) in d = 3 only holds up to T = exp(1/√|λ|) − 1, which limits the time window for the largest ρ values. Neither changes the main picture.

Who is this for? Mathematical physicists working on mean-field limits, Lieb-Robinson bounds, or effective equations for Bose gases. It deserves a serious referee. I would ask the authors to either integrate the ballistic lemma or clearly state it as a black box with full hypotheses, then accept after that check.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the mean-field dynamics of N bosons on the lattice Z^d with Hamiltonian (1.3), starting from an approximate condensate. Its central claim, Theorem 1.1, is a local enhancement of the mean-field approximation: if the initial condensate is supported outside B_{r+rho} and the observable is supported in B_r, then for times t <= rho/v the error |Tr((gamma_{psi_N,t} - N|phi_t><phi_t|)O)| is bounded by C ||O||_op rho^{-n} for every integer n >= 1, under a dispersive assumption (DE). The proof mechanism is a ballistic propagation bound for fluctuations, Theorem 1.2, obtained by adapting the ASTLO method to the particle non-conserving generator of the fluctuation dynamics. The paper also contains a global fluctuation estimate (Theorem 4.1) and a verification of (DE) for small |lambda| (Appendix A).

Significance. If the result is fully established, it is a genuine new local improvement over the standard global 1/N mean-field error bound, and the ASTLO adaptation to the fluctuation generator is an interesting methodological contribution. I credit the paper for deriving most of the technical estimates in the text, including the commutator bounds of Lemma 2.1, the local fluctuation estimate of Theorem 3.1, and the dispersive verification in Appendix A; there are no fitted parameters or post-hoc exclusions. However, the central theorem inherits one load-bearing ingredient, the ballistic upper bound for the nonlinear Schroedinger flow, from an unpublished preprint without proof, and this makes the current version conditional.

major comments (1)

[Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.2] In the paragraph after (5.4), the proof says 'Inserting the global fluctuation bound (4.7) into (5.3)'. Equation (4.7) is Corollary 4.3, a local fluctuation estimate, not a global bound; the argument only needs Theorem 4.1 to control sup_tau <N+1>_tau. This is a misreference rather than a mathematical gap, but it should be corrected.

minor comments (6)

[Equation (1.16)] Assumption (1.16) is missing a closing angle bracket: it should read <psi_N,0, N^+_{B_{r+rho}}(0) psi_N,0> = 0.
[Appendix A, equation (A.2)] The displayed dispersive estimate has the norm indices swapped: it should be ||e^{itDelta} f||_infty <= C1 <t>^{-d/3} ||f||_1, which is the form used later in (A.10).
[Section 5, proof of Theorem 1.2] The reference to 'global fluctuation bound (4.7)' should be to Theorem 4.1; equation (4.7) is a local bound from Corollary 4.3.
[Remark 3.1] 'Not that' should be 'Note that'.
[Lemma 2.1] In (2.23), 'as on operator inequality' should read 'as an operator inequality'.
[Section 6.1, equation (6.31)] The notation i\phi_-(h) is introduced twice; define it once, earlier in the proof.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central claims are derived from stated dispersive and ballistic assumptions whose content is separate from the many-body target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 are proved from Theorem 3.1 (local fluctuation estimate), Theorem 4.1 (global fluctuation bounds under the dispersive assumption), Theorem 5.1 (local suppression using a ballistic flow bound), and Lemma 6.1 (comparison of reduced densities). Each of these ingredients is proved in the paper, with one external import: Theorem 5.2 is taken from the same author's preprint [Zha24b]. That theorem is a deterministic ballistic upper bound for nonlinear Schroedinger flows, stated with assumptions (5.6)-(5.7) that do not include the many-body mean-field target or the fluctuation bounds being proved; the citation is therefore load-bearing but not circular. The dispersive assumption (DE), Eq. (1.9), is not a fitted input or a renamed conclusion: Appendix A and Section 4.2 verify it for small |lambda| using the independent lattice Strichartz estimates (A.2)-(A.3) from [SK05, KT98], and the final constants depend on the verified constant c rather than on the error bound. The ASTLO machinery is developed in Sections 3.2-3.4, and the imported commutator estimate [LRZ23, eq. (4.44)] concerns only the free lattice Laplacian, not the fluctuation target. No parameter is fitted to the output, and no quantity presented as a prediction is an input by construction. The omitted proof of the [Zha24b] ballistic bound is a correctness and reproducibility concern, not a circularity concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; the velocity v and integer n are universal quantifiers in the theorem statements, not fitted constants. The axioms are dominated by the dispersive estimate (DE) and the ballistic NLS bound borrowed from [Zha24b], plus explicit geometric support assumptions. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Dispersive estimate (DE), Eq. (1.9): integral over time of the Hartree solution's sup norm is bounded by c times the ell-1 norm of the initial data.
This is the main physical/mathematical input used throughout Sections 4, 5, and 6 to control the Hartree flow. It is proved in Appendix A only under small |lambda|, globally in d >= 4 and up to T = exp(1/sqrt(|lambda|)) - 1 in d = 3.
domain assumption Ballistic upper bound for the nonlinear Schroedinger flow, Theorem 5.2, cited to [Zha24b].
Used in the proof of Theorem 5.1 (see Eq. (5.8)) to guarantee that the condensate wave function remains exponentially small in the probe region for times up to rho/v. This result is not proved in the present paper and is taken as a black box.
domain assumption Geometric localization of the initial state: the initial condensate is supported outside B_{r+rho} and, in Theorem 1.2, the initial fluctuations have no support in B_{r+rho}.
These support conditions define the light-cone geometry in Figure 1 and Figure 2; they are explicit hypotheses in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.
domain assumption Smallness condition |lambda| <= lambda_0 and dimension d >= 3.
The small coupling and dimension restriction enter the dispersive estimates and global well-posedness results in Appendix A; they are stated as hypotheses at the start of Section 1.4.
standard math Standard Fock space and second quantization facts, including the fluctuation unitary U_{N,t} and the modified CCRs (2.11).
These are established mathematical background used to derive the generator L_N(t) in Section 2 and are not new physical postulates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local enhancement of the mean-field approximation for bosons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MT62FJ7F

@misc{pith2026241213868,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local enhancement of the mean-field approximation for bosons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MT62FJ7F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13868}
}

abstract

We study the quantum many-body dynamics of a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) on the lattice in the mean-field regime. We derive a local enhancement of the mean-field approximation: At positive distance $\rho>0$ from the initial BEC, the mean-field approximation error at time $t\leq \rho/v$ is bounded as $\rho^{-n}$, for arbitrarily large $n\geq 1$. This is a consequence of new ballistic propagation bounds on the fluctuations around the condensate. To prove this, we develop a variant of the ASTLO (adiabatic spacetime localization observable) method for the particle non-conserving generator of the fluctuation dynamics around Hartree states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13868 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The geometry in the first result (see Theorem 1.1). If the initial condensate is supported away from BR and the test observable O is supported in Br, then the mean-field approximation error Tr((γψN,t − N |ϕti hϕt |)O) is bounded by ρ −n for times t ≤ ρ/v where ρ = R − r is the distance that has to be traversed. By turning this principle into mathematical bounds, we improve the mean-field approximation at positive d… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The assumption on the geometry in Theorem 1.2, which is a weaker assumption than that for Theorem 1.1. Estimate (1.17) says that if the initial ϕ0 is supported 2ρ-away from Br and there are initially no fluctuations on Br+ρ, then the local fluctuation number in Br is suppressed up to time t ≤ ρ/v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** below. µ 0 ǫ/2 ǫ 1 θ(µ) f(µ) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

Maximal speed of quantum propagation for the Hartree equation

Jack Arbunich, J \'e r \'e my Faupin, Fabio Pusateri, and Israel Michael Sigal. Maximal speed of quantum propagation for the Hartree equation . Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 48(4):542--575, 2023

work page 2023
[2]

A central limit theorem in many-body quantum dynamics

G \'e rard Ben Arous, Kay Kirkpatrick, and Benjamin Schlein. A central limit theorem in many-body quantum dynamics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 321(2):371--417, May 2013

work page 2013
[3]

Quantitative Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation

Niels Benedikter, Gustavo de Oliveira, and Benjamin Schlein. Quantitative Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation . Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 68(8):1399--1482, 2015

work page 2015
[4]

Beyond B ogoliubov dynamics

Lea Bo mann, S \"o ren Petrat, Peter Pickl, and Avy Soffer. Beyond B ogoliubov dynamics. Pure and Applied Analysis , 3(4):677--726, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

Mean--field evolution of fermionic systems

Niels Benedikter, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Mean--field evolution of fermionic systems. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 331:1087--1131, 2014

work page 2014
[6]

Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics

Niels Benedikter, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics . Springer International Publishing, 2016

work page 2016
[7]

Gross--Pitaevskii dynamics for Bose--Einstein condensates

Christian Brennecke and Benjamin Schlein. Gross--Pitaevskii dynamics for Bose--Einstein condensates . Analysis & PDE , 12(6):1513--1596, 2019

work page 2019
[8]

On the K lainerman-- M achedon conjecture for the quantum BBGKY hierarchy with self-interaction

Xuwen Chen and Justin Holmer. On the K lainerman-- M achedon conjecture for the quantum BBGKY hierarchy with self-interaction. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 18(6):1161--1200, 2016

work page 2016

Show all 48 references

[9]

The derivation of the T ^3 energy-critical NLS from quantum many-body dynamics

Xuwen Chen and Justin Holmer. The derivation of the T ^3 energy-critical NLS from quantum many-body dynamics. Inventiones mathematicae , 217:433--547, 2019

2019
[10]

Dynamics of mean-field bosons at positive temperature

Andreas Deuchert, Marco Caporaletti, and Benjamin Schlein. Dynamics of mean-field bosons at positive temperature. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar\' e (C) Analyse Non Lin\' e aire , 4(41):995--1054, 2023

2023
[11]

Uniform in Time Convergence to Bose-Einstein Condensation for a Weakly Interacting Bose Gas with an External Potential

Charlotte Dietze and Jinyeop Lee. Uniform in Time Convergence to Bose-Einstein Condensation for a Weakly Interacting Bose Gas with an External Potential . In Quantum Mathematics II , pages 267--311. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023

2023
[12]

Nonlinear H artree equation as the mean field limit of weakly coupled fermions

Alexander Elgart, L \'a szl \'o Erd o s, Benjamin Schlein, and Horng-Tzer Yau. Nonlinear H artree equation as the mean field limit of weakly coupled fermions. Journal de math \'e matiques pures et appliqu \'e es , 83(10):1241--1273, 2004

2004
[13]

Quantum dynamics with mean field interactions: a new approach

L \'a szl \'o Erd o s and Benjamin Schlein. Quantum dynamics with mean field interactions: a new approach. Journal of Statistical Physics , 134(5):859--870, 2009

2009
[14]

Rigorous derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with a large interaction potential

L \'a szl \'o Erd o s, Benjamin Schlein, and Horng-Tzer Yau. Rigorous derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with a large interaction potential . Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 22(4):1099--1156, 2009

2009
[15]

Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensate

L \'a szl \'o Erdos, Benjamin Schlein, and Horng-Tzer Yau. Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of Bose-Einstein condensate . Annals of Mathematics , 172:291--370, 2010

2010
[16]

Maximal speed for macroscopic particle transport in the B ose- H ubbard model

J\' e r\' e my Faupin, Marius Lemm, and Israel Michael Sigal. Maximal speed for macroscopic particle transport in the B ose- H ubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 128(15):Paper No. 150602, 6, 2022

2022
[17]

On L ieb- R obinson bounds for the B ose- H ubbard model

J\' e r\' e my Faupin, Marius Lemm, and Israel Michael Sigal. On L ieb- R obinson bounds for the B ose- H ubbard model. Commun. Math. Phys. , 394(3):1011--1037, 2022

2022
[18]

Effective dynamics of extended fermi gases in the high-density regime

Luca Fresta, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Effective dynamics of extended fermi gases in the high-density regime. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 401(2):1701--1751, 2023

2023
[19]

Grillakis, Matei Machedon, and Dionisios Margetis

Manoussos G. Grillakis, Matei Machedon, and Dionisios Margetis. Second-order corrections to mean field evolution of weakly interacting bosons. I . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 294(1):273--301, 2009

2009
[20]

Grillakis, M

M. Grillakis, M. Machedon, and D. Margetis. Second-order corrections to mean field evolution of weakly interacting bosons. II . Advances in Mathematics , 228(3):1788--1815, October 2011

2011
[21]

Uncertainty principle, minimal escape velocities, and observability inequalities for S chr \"o dinger equations

Shanlin Huang and Avy Soffer. Uncertainty principle, minimal escape velocities, and observability inequalities for S chr \"o dinger equations. American Journal of Mathematics , 143(3):753--781, 2021

2021
[22]

Uniform S trichartz estimates on the lattice

Younghun Hong and Changhun Yang. Uniform S trichartz estimates on the lattice. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - A , 39(6):3239--3264, 2019

2019
[23]

Enhanced L ieb- R obinson bounds for a class of B ose- H ubbard type hamiltonians

Tomotaka Kuwahara and Marius Lemm. Enhanced L ieb- R obinson bounds for a class of B ose- H ubbard type hamiltonians. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.04672 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[24]

Mean-field dynamics: singular potentials and rate of convergence

Antti Knowles and Peter Pickl. Mean-field dynamics: singular potentials and rate of convergence. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 298:101--138, 2010

2010
[25]

Lieb- R obinson bound and almost-linear light cone in interacting boson systems

Tomotaka Kuwahara and Keiji Saito. Lieb- R obinson bound and almost-linear light cone in interacting boson systems. Physical Review Letters , 127(7):070403, 2021

2021
[26]

Endpoint S trichartz estimates

Markus Keel and Terence Tao. Endpoint S trichartz estimates. American Journal of Mathematics , 120(5):955--980, October 1998

1998
[27]

Rate of convergence to mean field for interacting bosons

Elif Kuz. Rate of convergence to mean field for interacting bosons. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 40(10):1831--1854, June 2015

2015
[28]

Effective light cone and digital quantum simulation of interacting bosons

Tomotaka Kuwahara, Tan Van Vu, and Keiji Saito. Effective light cone and digital quantum simulation of interacting bosons. Nature Communications , 15(1):2520, 2024

2024
[29]

On the Time Dependence of the Rate of Convergence Towards Hartree Dynamics for Interacting Bosons

Jinyeop Lee. On the Time Dependence of the Rate of Convergence Towards Hartree Dynamics for Interacting Bosons . Journal of Statistical Physics , 176(2):358--381, May 2019

2019
[30]

Fluctuations around H artree states in the mean-field regime

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th \`a nh Nam, and Benjamin Schlein. Fluctuations around H artree states in the mean-field regime. American Journal of Mathematics , 137(6):1613--1650, 2015

2015
[31]

B ogoliubov spectrum of interacting B ose gases

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Thanh Nam, Sylvia Serfaty, and Jan Philip Solovej. B ogoliubov spectrum of interacting B ose gases. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 68(3):413--471, 2015

2015
[32]

The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems

Elliott H Lieb and Derek W Robinson. The finite group velocity of quantum spin systems. Communications in mathematical physics , 28(3):251--257, 1972

1972
[33]

Out-of-time-ordered correlators of mean-field bosons via Bogoliubov theory

Marius Lemm and Simone Rademacher. Out-of-time-ordered correlators of mean-field bosons via Bogoliubov theory . arXiv preprint, arXiv:2312.01736 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[34]

Information propagation in long-range quantum many-body systems

Marius Lemm, Carla Rubiliani, Israel Michael Sigal, and Jingxuan Zhang. Information propagation in long-range quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. A , 108:L060401, Dec 2023

2023
[35]

On the microscopic propagation speed of long-range quantum many-body systems

Marius Lemm, Carla Rubiliani, and Jingxuan Zhang. On the microscopic propagation speed of long-range quantum many-body systems. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2310.14896 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[36]

Strong semiclassical limits from H artree and H artree-- F ock to V lasov-- P oisson equations

Laurent Lafleche and Chiara Saffirio. Strong semiclassical limits from H artree and H artree-- F ock to V lasov-- P oisson equations. Analysis & PDE , 16(4):891--926, 2023

2023
[37]

Bogoliubov corrections and trace norm convergence for the H artree dynamics

David Mitrouskas, S \"o ren Petrat, and Peter Pickl. Bogoliubov corrections and trace norm convergence for the H artree dynamics. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , 31(08):1950024, 2019

2019
[38]

Dynamics of interacting bosons: a compact review

Marcin Napi \'o rkowski. Dynamics of interacting bosons: a compact review. In Density Functionals For Many-particle Systems: Mathematical Theory And Physical Applications Of Effective Equations , pages 117--154. World Scientific, 2023

2023
[39]

Bogoliubov correction to the mean-field dynamics of interacting bosons

Phan Th \`a nh Nam and Marcin Napi \'o rkowski. Bogoliubov correction to the mean-field dynamics of interacting bosons. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 21(3):683--738, 2017

2017
[40]

Lieb- R obinson bounds for harmonic and anharmonic lattice systems

Bruno Nachtergaele, Hillel Raz, Benjamin Schlein, and Robert Sims. Lieb- R obinson bounds for harmonic and anharmonic lattice systems. arXiv preprint, arXiv:0712.3820 , 2007

2007 arXiv
[41]

A simple derivation of mean field limits for quantum systems

Peter Pickl. A simple derivation of mean field limits for quantum systems. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 97:151--164, 2011

2011
[42]

Quantum fluctuations and rate of convergence towards mean field dynamics

Igor Rodnianski and Benjamin Schlein. Quantum fluctuations and rate of convergence towards mean field dynamics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 291(1):31--61, July 2009

2009
[43]

L arge deviation estimates for weakly interacting bosons

Simone Rademacher and Robert Seiringer. L arge deviation estimates for weakly interacting bosons. Journal of Statistical Physics , 188(1):9, 2022

2022
[44]

Information propagation for interacting-particle systems

Norbert Schuch, Sarah K Harrison, Tobias J Osborne, and Jens Eisert. Information propagation for interacting-particle systems . Physical Review A , 84(3):032309, 2011

2011
[45]

Asymptotic behaviour of small solutions for the discrete nonlinear Schr\"odinger and Klein-Gordon equations

Atanas Stefanov and Panayotis G Kevrekidis. Asymptotic behaviour of small solutions for the discrete nonlinear Schr\"odinger and Klein-Gordon equations . Nonlinearity , 18(4):1841--1857, May 2005

2005
[46]

Finite speed of quantum information in models of interacting bosons at finite density

Chao Yin and Andrew Lucas. Finite speed of quantum information in models of interacting bosons at finite density. Physical Review X , 12(2):021039, 2022

2022
[47]

Spectral localization estimates for abstract linear S chr\"odinger equations

Jingxuan Zhang. Spectral localization estimates for abstract linear S chr\"odinger equations. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2409.10873 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[48]

Upper bounds in non-autonomous quantum dynamics

Jingxuan Zhang. Upper bounds in non-autonomous quantum dynamics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2409.13762 , 2024

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Maximal speed of quantum propagation for the Hartree equation

Jack Arbunich, J \'e r \'e my Faupin, Fabio Pusateri, and Israel Michael Sigal. Maximal speed of quantum propagation for the Hartree equation . Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 48(4):542--575, 2023

work page 2023

[2] [2]

A central limit theorem in many-body quantum dynamics

G \'e rard Ben Arous, Kay Kirkpatrick, and Benjamin Schlein. A central limit theorem in many-body quantum dynamics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 321(2):371--417, May 2013

work page 2013

[3] [3]

Quantitative Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation

Niels Benedikter, Gustavo de Oliveira, and Benjamin Schlein. Quantitative Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation . Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 68(8):1399--1482, 2015

work page 2015

[4] [4]

Beyond B ogoliubov dynamics

Lea Bo mann, S \"o ren Petrat, Peter Pickl, and Avy Soffer. Beyond B ogoliubov dynamics. Pure and Applied Analysis , 3(4):677--726, 2022

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Mean--field evolution of fermionic systems

Niels Benedikter, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Mean--field evolution of fermionic systems. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 331:1087--1131, 2014

work page 2014

[6] [6]

Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics

Niels Benedikter, Marcello Porta, and Benjamin Schlein. Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics . Springer International Publishing, 2016

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Gross--Pitaevskii dynamics for Bose--Einstein condensates

Christian Brennecke and Benjamin Schlein. Gross--Pitaevskii dynamics for Bose--Einstein condensates . Analysis & PDE , 12(6):1513--1596, 2019

work page 2019

[8] [8]

On the K lainerman-- M achedon conjecture for the quantum BBGKY hierarchy with self-interaction

Xuwen Chen and Justin Holmer. On the K lainerman-- M achedon conjecture for the quantum BBGKY hierarchy with self-interaction. Journal of the European Mathematical Society , 18(6):1161--1200, 2016

work page 2016