Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 24 references

Combined selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) and full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT) for in vivo imaging

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By sharing one detection path, SPIM and FF-OCT produce co-registered fluorescence and anatomical images in live zebrafish.

desk verdict Credible SPIM+FF-OCT integration with a real but fixable 2-phase phase-artifact caveat. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14047 v1 pith:5VCHFX62 submitted 2024-12-18 physics.optics physics.bio-ph

Rui Ma , Olga Lyraki , Daniel Wehner , Jochen Guck This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.bio-ph
keywords selectiveplaneilluminationmicroscopyfull-fieldopticalcoherencetomographymultimodalimaginginvivoco-registrationsectioningzebrafishlarvaelabel-freestructural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper shows how to add label-free structural imaging to a light-sheet fluorescence microscope by integrating full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT) into the same detection path. Because SPIM and FF-OCT share the detection objective, tube lens, and camera, the fluorescence and structural images are naturally co-registered, and no sample rotation or tomographic reconstruction is required. The authors report a lateral resolution of about 0.75 µm for both channels, a SPIM axial resolution of about 4.07 µm, and an FF-OCT axial resolution of about 1.5 µm in water, then demonstrate the system on live zebrafish larvae. The central claim is that existing SPIM setups can gain a high-resolution anatomical context channel simply and at low cost.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the shared detection path: a single 20× objective, tube lens, and CMOS camera serve both modalities, with only a flippable quadband emission filter switched in for SPIM. FF-OCT is implemented as an epi-Köhler low-coherence interferometer using a 565 nm, 104 nm bandwidth LED; a non-polarizing beamsplitter divides the light between the sample arm and a reference arm that contains a matched objective and an OD 6.0 mirror, and the depth-resolved structural image is recovered from two phase-shifted frames via $\frac{I(x,y,\varphi_0)-I(x,y,\varphi_0+\pi)}{2}=A(x,y)\cos\varphi_0$. The short coherence length of the LED is what gives FF-OCT its ~1.5 µm axial sectioning in water, and because these optics are added on the illumination side, the SPIM arrangement itself is unchanged.

What would settle it

Image the same zebrafish trunk plane with the current two-step FF-OCT protocol and with a three-step or five-step phase-shifting protocol; if structures such as thin muscle septa or notochord boundaries appear in the higher-order retrieval but are absent or contrast-inverted in the two-step image, the assumption that $A(x,y)\cos\varphi_0$ suffices is disproven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using live zebrafish larvae carrying GFP-labeled neurons, the combined SPIM-FF-OCT system captures fluorescence images and label-free structural images from the same plane, allowing spinal cord, notochord, muscle, and median finfold to be distinguished in the structural channel while the fluorescent channel shows the neuronal pattern. The structural channel is produced by time-domain FF-OCT with a 565 nm LED and a two-phase-shifting interferometric retrieval, and the shared detection path makes the two image types registered by construction. The reported resolutions are 0.75 µm lateral (set by the fluorescent beads for both modalities), a 4.07 µm light-sheet waist for SPIM axial sectioning, and a 2.0 µm coherence envelope for FF-OCT in air, corresponding to 1.5 µm in water. Depth scans with 5-10 µm intervals show that both channels section through the larval trunk, with structural features changing from the finfold to the notochord.

Load-bearing premise

The weakest point is the two-step phase-shifting retrieval for FF-OCT, which leaves the structural image proportional to a product of the backscattered amplitude and the cosine of its phase; the paper assumes this mixed quantity is still enough to reveal the anatomy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any existing SPIM system can gain a label-free structural channel by adding the FF-OCT illumination and reference arm, with no change to the established light-sheet detection path.
  • Fluorescence and structural images are co-registered by construction, removing the need for computational alignment when linking labeled cells to surrounding anatomy.
  • The FF-OCT channel's sub-2 µm axial resolution distinguishes tissue layers such as spinal cord, notochord, and muscle in live zebrafish, providing anatomical context for fluorescence.
  • Upgrading the camera to a higher bit-depth, cooled CMOS would shorten acquisition by an estimated factor of 2-3 and, with image stitching, make whole-body time-lapse imaging practical.
  • Integrating dynamic FF-OCT analysis into the same shared path could add subcellular structural contrast based on intracellular motility and metabolic activity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-step structural retrieval leaves the image proportional to the backscattered amplitude times the cosine of the phase; structures whose phase is near a zero crossing could drop out, so a three-step or five-step phase protocol would test whether the current channel is missing tissue boundaries.
  • Because the mount needs no sample rotation, the same larva could be imaged repeatedly over hours without re-registration; this follows from the design even though the paper does not claim it.
  • The shared detection path means camera upgrades improve both channels together, so field of view, bit depth, and signal-to-noise ratio will scale simultaneously as the hardware evolves.
  • The authors' proposed dynamic FF-OCT extension is directly testable on this setup, since the low-coherence LED and the absence of beam steering already provide the illumination conditions needed for motility-based contrast.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a combined selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) and full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT) system that shares a single detection path, allowing co-registered fluorescence and label-free structural imaging without sample rotation or complex reconstruction. The SPIM arm uses a standard light-sheet configuration with a 20× detection objective, while the FF-OCT arm uses a 565 nm LED with a 104 nm bandwidth and a 2-phase shifting algorithm. The authors characterize lateral resolution (0.75 µm), SPIM axial resolution (4.07 µm), and FF-OCT axial resolution (2.0 µm in air, 1.5 µm in water), and demonstrate the system on live zebrafish larvae at 2 dpf and 4 dpf, showing optical sectioning and anatomical context (spinal cord, notochord, muscle, finfold) with fluorescence labels of neurons.

Significance. If the technical claims hold, the system offers a practical way to add structural context to SPIM without the sample rotation and computational reconstruction required by optical tomography or multi-view bright-field methods, and with better lateral resolution than swept-source OCT implementations. The shared detection path is an elegant design that makes co-registration conceptually straightforward. The in vivo zebrafish images illustrate the value of combining fluorescence with label-free structural information. The paper is a proof-of-principle, not a full quantitative validation; its main weaknesses are the reliance on a 2-phase FF-OCT algorithm without phase-robustness evidence, and the absence of quantitative co-registration verification and measurement statistics.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2] The 2-phase shifting method retrieves (I(x,y,φ0) − I(x,y,φ0+π))/2 = A(x,y) cos φ0, which depends on the sub-wavelength phase φ0. The paper asserts this is 'sufficient for retrieving 2D structural information,' but provides no quantitative validation. Because φ0 varies across the field of view due to surface tilt and internal scatterer distribution, regions with cos φ0 near zero or negative could suppress or invert true backscattering contrast, producing phase-dependent artifacts. To support the central claim that FF-OCT provides reliable structural context, please compare the 2-phase result with a standard N≥3 phase-shifting algorithm on the same sample, or acquire 2-phase images at multiple phase offsets and show that the structural features are consistent.
  2. [§2.1, §2.2, §3.2] The claim of 'seamless and efficient co-registration' through the shared detection path is plausible but not quantified. No measurement of registration accuracy (e.g., a target with features visible in both SPIM and FF-OCT, or a distortion assessment) is provided. Since SPIM and FF-OCT use different illumination arms and the sample is scanned axially, residual misalignment or chromatic effects could degrade the overlay shown in Figs. 3–5. Please report a co-registration error metric (in pixels or µm) for a test target, and state whether the overlay in the figure panels is obtained by a simple global shift or by an affine/warping transform.
  3. [§3.1] The resolution values are reported without error bars or replicate counts. The lateral resolution is the FWHM of a single 0.5 µm bead (Fig. 2a), the SPIM axial resolution is from one beam-waist scan (Fig. 2b), and the FF-OCT axial resolution is from one autocorrelation fit (Fig. 2c). Given fitting uncertainty and pixelation, a single measurement is insufficient to claim these as system resolutions. Please provide N, mean, and standard deviation for each measurement, and specify the fitting procedure (e.g., Gaussian fit) and the number of beads or scans used.
  4. [§3.2] The FF-OCT images in Fig. 3a show saturated, uninformative regions in highly pigmented areas (white arrows). The paper acknowledges this as a camera limitation, but it affects the in vivo demonstration: the anatomical context is missing exactly where the sample is most opaque, which is a relevant scenario for biological imaging. If the goal is to demonstrate structural context in live zebrafish, this limitation should be addressed or at least systematically characterized (e.g., dynamic range, percentage of saturated pixels). The discussion of future camera upgrades is reasonable, but a quantitative statement of the current limitation would strengthen the paper.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2] The mathematical expression for the 2-phase result is missing parentheses and is not explicitly numbered. Please number the equation and write it as (I(x,y,φ0) − I(x,y,φ0+π))/2 = A(x,y) cos φ0, and define A(x,y) and φ0 in the text.
  2. [§3.1] The claim that the measured 0.75 µm lateral resolution applies to both SPIM and FF-OCT because the fluorescence emission wavelength (≈520 nm) is close to the LED center wavelength (565 nm) is reasonable for a diffraction-limited system, but it assumes the same effective NA in both modalities. Please state the detection NA and the expected diffraction-limited spot size explicitly.
  3. [§3.2] The field of view is given as 244.8 µm × 183.6 µm for a 1440×1080 camera, but the scale bar in Fig. 3(d) is labeled 50 µm. Please verify that the scale bar and the stated FOV are consistent, and specify the pixel size used in the calculations.
  4. [§2.2] The sentence 'the retrieved 2D image at a certain depth (I(x,y,φ0)−I(x,y,φ0+π))/2 is a contribution of amplitude and phase' is grammatically awkward. Please rewrite for clarity.
  5. [§1] The abstract and introduction state that the system is built 'without requiring modifications to the existing SPIM setup,' but adding the FF-OCT reference arm and beamsplitter does require optical access. Please clarify that the SPIM illumination and detection paths remain unchanged, while FF-OCT components are added externally.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an experimental system demonstration whose resolution and co-registration claims are supported by external calibrations, not by definitions or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental integration of SPIM and FF-OCT and does not derive a predictive result from fitted inputs. The resolution claims are calibrated against external references: lateral resolution uses 0.5 um fluorescent microspheres, SPIM axial resolution uses a tilted glass plate scanned through the light sheet, and FF-OCT axial resolution uses an autocorrelation measurement from a tilted glass plate. None of these measurements are defined in terms of the paper's own model output, so there is no self-definitional or fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. The acknowledged limitation of the 2-phase shifting method in Section 2.2 is a correctness risk, not a circular step: the authors state that the retrieved image is A(x,y)cos(phi0) and that this is 'sufficient for retrieving 2D structural information,' but the structural images are presented as empirical demonstrations, not as quantities derived from that assumption by construction. The self-citations to the authors' own previous work (e.g., refs. 17-20 for zebrafish handling and biological context) are not load-bearing for the optical system's function or resolution. No uniqueness theorem is imported, and no known result is renamed as a new organization. The central claims stand on external calibrations and direct imaging demonstrations, so a score of 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities and fits no numerical parameters. Its central assumptions are standard interferometric modeling plus two paper-specific assertions: that 2-phase shifting is sufficient and that shared detection guarantees co-registration. The latter two are not independently verified.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math FF-OCT interference signal follows the standard low-coherence interferometry model, where the measured intensity contains a cosine interference term.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 to justify the 2-phase shifting method and the retrieval of structural information.
  • domain assumption Moving the sample by a step corresponding to a pi phase shift is sufficient to produce the two phase-shifted frames needed for 2-phase shifting.
    Section 2.2 relies on the z-stage minimum step size and repeatability, but this is not explicitly validated with a phase-step calibration.
  • standard math The 565 nm LED with 104 nm bandwidth produces a coherence length corresponding to roughly 2 micrometers axial resolution in air and 1.5 micrometers in water.
    Used in Section 3.1 to convert the measured autocorrelation FWHM into an axial resolution claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The 2-phase shifting result, despite containing a cosine phase factor, is sufficient for retrieving structural information.
    Section 2.2 explicitly states this is 'sufficient' based on the authors' finding, but no benchmark against a standard 3-phase algorithm is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Pixel-level co-registration follows directly from sharing the detection path.
    The abstract and Section 2 assert seamless co-registration, but no quantitative overlay error or drift measurement is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combined selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) and full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT) for in vivo imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5VCHFX62

@misc{pith2026241214047,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combined selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) and full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT) for in vivo imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5VCHFX62}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14047}
}
read the original abstract

Selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM), also known as light sheet fluorescence microscopy, provides high specificity through fluorescence labeling. However, it lacks complementary structural information from the surrounding context, which is essential for the comprehensive analysis of biological samples. Here, we present a high-resolution, multimodal imaging system that integrates SPIM with full-field optical coherence tomography (FF-OCT), without requiring modifications to the existing SPIM setup. Both SPIM and FF-OCT offer low phototoxicity and intrinsic optical sectioning, making them well-suited for in vivo imaging. Their shared detection path enables seamless and efficient co-registration of fluorescence and structural data. We demonstrate the functionality of this combined system by performing in vivo imaging of zebrafish larvae.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14047 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. illustrates a simplified schematic of the combined SPIM-FF-OCT setup, and Visualization 1 provides further details on the combined setup. The illumination paths of the SPIM and FF-OCT are indicated in green and red, respectively. The two imaging modalities share the same detection path, which consists of a tube lens and a camera. A flippable quadband emission filter is inserted in the detection path during SPIM imag… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Lateral resolution measurement of the combined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FF-OCT and SPIM images of the trunk of a 2 dpf elavl3:GFP-F transgenic zebrafish (rostral is up, dorsal s left). The fluorescently labelled neurons of the spinal cord (GFP) are indicated in green. (a) FF-OCT image (white arrows indicate highly pigmented regions). (b) SPIM image. (c) Co-registration of SPIM and FF-OCT images. (d) Field of view in the context of the zebrafish larva. Abbreviations: f, median finfold; s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FF-OCT and corresponding SPIM images of the trunk of a 2 dpf elavl3:GFP-F transgenic zebrafish (rostral is up, dorsal s left) with 10 µm scan interval, demonstrating the optical sectioning capability of the combined setup. The fluorescently labelled neurons of the spin…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Co-registered FF-OCT and SPIM images of the trunk of a 4 dpf elavl3:GFP-F transgenic zebrafish (rostral is up, dorsal s left) with 5 µm scan interval. The fluorescently labelled neurons of the spinal cord (GFP) are indicated in green. Abbreviations: f, median finfold; …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Optical Sectioning Deep Inside Live Embryos by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy,

    J. Huisken, J. Swoger, F. Del Bene, J. Wittbrodt, and E. H. K. Stelzer, "Optical Sectioning Deep Inside Live Embryos by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy," Science (1979) 305(5686), 1007–1009 (2004)

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    Whole-animal functional and developmental imaging with isotropic spatial resolution,

    R. K. Chhetri, F. Amat, Y. Wan, B. Höckendorf, W. C. Lemon, and P. J. Keller, "Whole-animal functional and developmental imaging with isotropic spatial resolution," Nat Methods 12(12), 1171–1178 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy,

    M. B. Ahrens, M. B. Orger, D. N. Robson, J. M. Li, and P. J. Keller, "Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy," Nat Methods 10(5), 413–420 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Light Sheet-Based Imaging and Analysis of Early Embryogenesis in the Fruit Fly,

    K. Khairy, W. C. Lemon, F. Amat, and P. J. Keller, "Light Sheet-Based Imaging and Analysis of Early Embryogenesis in the Fruit Fly," in (2015), pp. 79–97

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Tracking cells in epithelial acini by light sheet microscopy reveals proximity effects in breast cancer initiation,

    A. Alladin, L. Chaible, L. Garcia del Valle, R. Sabine, M. Loeschinger, M. Wachsmuth, J.-K. Hériché, C. Tischer, and M. Jechlinger, "Tracking cells in epithelial acini by light sheet microscopy reveals proximity effects in breast cancer initiation," Elife 9, (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens,

    A. K. Glaser, N. P. Reder, Y. Chen, E. F. McCarty, C. Yin, L. Wei, Y. Wang, L. D. True, and J. T. C. Liu, "Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens," Nat Biomed Eng 1(7), 0084 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Optical tomography complements light sheet microscopy for in toto imaging of zebrafish development,

    A. Bassi, B. Schmid, and J. Huisken, "Optical tomography complements light sheet microscopy for in toto imaging of zebrafish development," Development (Cambridge) 142(5), 1016–1020 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Three-dimensional bright-field microscopy with isotropic resolution based on multi-view acquisition and image fusion reconstruction,

    G. Calisesi, A. Candeo, A. Farina, C. D’Andrea, V. Magni, G. Valentini, A. Pistocchi, A. Costa, and A. Bassi, "Three-dimensional bright-field microscopy with isotropic resolution based on multi-view acquisition and image fusion reconstruction," Sci Rep 10(1), 12771 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    Multimodal high-resolution embryonic imaging with light sheet fluorescence microscopy and optical coherence tomography,

    B. Khajavi, R. Sun, H. S. Chawla, H. H. Le, M. Singh, A. W. Schill, M. E. Dickinson, D. Mayerich, and K. V. Larin, "Multimodal high-resolution embryonic imaging with light sheet fluorescence microscopy and optical coherence tomography," Opt Lett 46(17), 4180 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Full-field optical coherence microscopy,

    E. Beaurepaire, A. C. Boccara, M. Lebec, L. Blanchot, and H. Saint-Jalmes, "Full-field optical coherence microscopy," Opt Lett 23(4), 244–246 (1998)

    1998

  3. [11]

    Dynamic multimodal full-field optical coherence tomography and fluorescence structured illumination microscopy,

    O. Thouvenin, M. Fink, and A. C. Boccara, "Dynamic multimodal full-field optical coherence tomography and fluorescence structured illumination microscopy," J Biomed Opt 22(02), 1 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform,

    P. G. Pitrone, J. Schindelin, L. Stuyvenberg, S. Preibisch, M. Weber, K. W. Eliceiri, J. Huisken, and P. Tomancak, "OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform," Nat Methods 10(7), 598–599 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    OpenSPIM,

    "OpenSPIM," https://openspim.org/

  6. [14]

    Micro-Manager,

    "Micro-Manager," https://micro-manager.org/

  7. [15]

    Keeping and raising zebrafish,

    M. Brand, M. Granato, and C. Nüsslein-Volhard, "Keeping and raising zebrafish," in Zebrafish (Oxford University PressOxford, 2002), pp. 7–38

    2002

  8. [16]

    Zebrafish: Housing and husbandry recommendations,

    P. Aleström, L. D’Angelo, P. J. Midtlyng, D. F. Schorderet, S. Schulte-Merker, F. Sohm, and S. Warner, "Zebrafish: Housing and husbandry recommendations," Lab Anim 54(3), 213–224 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Small leucine-rich proteoglycans inhibit CNS regeneration by modifying the structural and mechanical properties of the lesion environment,

    J. Kolb, V. Tsata, N. John, K. Kim, C. Möckel, G. Rosso, V. Kurbel, A. Parmar, G. Sharma, K. Karandasheva, S. Abuhattum, O. Lyraki, T. Beck, P. Müller, R. Schlüßler, R. Frischknecht, A. Wehner, N. Krombholz, B. Steigenberger, D. Beis, A. Takeoka, I. Blümcke, S. Möllmert, K. Si...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Know How to Regrow—Axon Regeneration in the Zebrafish Spinal Cord,

    V. Tsata and D. Wehner, "Know How to Regrow—Axon Regeneration in the Zebrafish Spinal Cord," Cells 10(6), 1404 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    RNA-induced inflammation and migration of precursor neurons initiates neuronal circuit regeneration in zebrafish,

    C. Vandestadt, G. C. Vanwalleghem, M. A. Khabooshan, A. M. Douek, H. A. Castillo, M. Li, K. Schulze, E. Don, S.-A. Stamatis, M. Ratnadiwakara, M.-L. Änkö, E. K. Scott, and J. Kaslin, "RNA-induced inflammation and migration of precursor neurons initiates neuronal circuit regene...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Mechanical spinal cord transection in larval zebrafish and subsequent whole-mount histological processing,

    N. John, J. Kolb, and D. Wehner, "Mechanical spinal cord transection in larval zebrafish and subsequent whole-mount histological processing," STAR Protoc 3(1), 101093 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions,

    S. Preibisch, S. Saalfeld, and P. Tomancak, "Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions," Bioinformatics 25(11), 1463–1465 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography: 3D live-imaging of retinal organoids,

    J. Scholler, K. Groux, O. Goureau, J.-A. Sahel, M. Fink, S. Reichman, C. Boccara, and K. Grieve, "Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography: 3D live-imaging of retinal organoids," Light Sci Appl 9(1), 140 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography module adapted to commercial microscopes allows longitudinal in vitro cell culture study,

    T. Monfort, S. Azzollini, J. Brogard, M. Clémençon, A. Slembrouck-Brec, V. Forster, S. Picaud, O. Goureau, S. Reichman, O. Thouvenin, and K. Grieve, "Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography module adapted to commercial microscopes allows longitudinal in vitro cell cult...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Automatic diagnosis and classification of breast surgical samples with dynamic full-field OCT and machine learning,

    J. Scholler, D. Mandache, M. C. Mathieu, A. Ben Lakhdar, M. Darche, T. Monfort, C. Boccara, J.-C. Olivo-Marin, K. Grieve, V. Meas-Yedid, E. B. a la Guillaume, and O. Thouvenin, "Automatic diagnosis and classification of breast surgical samples with dynamic full-field OCT and m...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.