Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 126 references

Starting a Synthetic Biological Intelligence Lab from Scratch

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A computationally focused lab can establish neural cultures and record their activity, this step-by-step guide argues.

desk verdict A genuinely useful tutorial, but the central feasibility claim outruns the anecdotal evidence; fixable with success-rate data and a clarified closed-loop statement. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14112 v1 pith:C5AJYJSI submitted 2024-12-18 q-bio.NC

Md Sayed Tanveer , Dhruvik Patel , Hunter E. Schweiger , Kwaku Dad Abu-Bonsrah , Brad Watmuff , Azin Azadi , Sergey Pryshchep , Karthikeyan Narayanan
show 5 more authors
Christopher Puleo Kannathal Natarajan Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji Brett J. Kagan Ge Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NC
keywords syntheticbiologicalintelligenceorganoidelectrophysiologybiocomputingneuroscienceartificialneuralcellculturemicroelectrodearray
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a practical tutorial, not a new experimental result. It argues that a laboratory whose expertise is computation--machine learning, signal processing, device interfacing--can enter synthetic biological intelligence and organoid intelligence research by following a defined sequence of cell-culture and recording steps. The authors walk through workspace setup, sterile handling, coating and plating primary E18 mouse cortical neurons, media selection and scheduling, and microelectrode-array recording, and they illustrate the outcome with example cultures that show healthy morphology and spontaneous spiking around day 14 in vitro. The reason this matters is that SBI research has been seen as requiring deep expertise in both biology and computation; this paper's claim is that the biological side can be bootstrapped by careful protocol following, opening the field to computational groups. It also notes risks, including contamination, coating toxicity, media pH drift, and cross-contamination, that can cost months if mishandled.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the two-stage wetware-plus-readout pipeline. Stage one is a defined cell-culture workflow: PDL and laminin coating of the recording surface, plating of E18 mouse cortical neurons (or hiPSC-derived neurons for slower human cultures), maintenance in a nutrient-rich medium with BDNF and an antimicrobial, and a scheduled partial media change with a transition to a maturation medium optimized for electrophysiology. Stage two is the microelectrode array (MEA), which converts culture health into measurable signals; high-density CMOS arrays provide roughly a hundred times the electrode density of planar arrays, while planar arrays offer transparency and more symmetrical stimulation channels. The MEA readout is what lets a computational researcher see, within about two weeks, whether the culture has formed a spontaneously active network.

What would settle it

Fresh laboratories with no prior cell-culture experience would each plate multiple wells following the protocol exactly; if the large majority of wells show no viable neurons or no detectable spontaneous spiking above noise by DIV 14-28 across several independent attempts, the paper's central feasibility claim would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the bottleneck for a new SBI lab is not wet-lab talent but a clear, ordered protocol: clean and coat the MEA wells, plate freshly dissociated cortical neurons at adequate density in a nutrient-rich medium, change media on a fixed schedule, switch to a maturation medium around days 7-10, and read out the result with extracellular electrodes. The example data show three MEA chips with healthy cultures whose firing rates, spike amplitudes around 150-300 microvolts, bursts, and occasional synchronized propagating activity indicate connected networks at DIV 14, alongside live/dead assays confirming cell health. By reporting one laboratory's step-by-step experience, including the failure timeline caused by contamination and the healthy timeline with added survival and antimicrobial factors, the paper tries to establish that this path is reproducible enough for a beginner group to follow and obtain usable electrophysiological signals.

Load-bearing premise

The protocols described here will transfer to other laboratories: the specific media, coatings, plating densities, and schedules will produce viable, spontaneously active cultures in the hands of beginners without prior cell-culture experience, even though the paper shows only a small number of example cultures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A computational group can establish a working SBI setup with a biosafety cabinet, an incubator, a centrifuge, a microscope, and commercially available MEA systems, without building a specialized environment first.
  • The recommended entry point is 2D monolayer cultures of primary E18 cortical neurons, which yield usable electrical signals around DIV 11-18; 3D organoids require longer timelines (months for human cells) and more complex media.
  • MEA-based extracellular recording is the recommended first readout because it is less invasive and more accessible than patch clamp or imaging, and it captures network-level interactions relevant to SBI.
  • Long-term experiments will require a dedicated closed-loop setup with automated media exchange and controlled environment, since cultures otherwise deteriorate and eventually enter quiescence.
  • Switching media gradually from maintenance to maturation medium around DIV 7-10 is presented as important for avoiding stress and for reaching spontaneous activity by DIV 14.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if these protocols transfer reliably, the main remaining bottleneck for computational labs becomes the closed-loop software and stimulation side, which is exactly where their skills already lie.
  • Editorial inference: the field would benefit from publishing success rates, meaning the fraction of plated wells that produce usable activity, rather than only example images, since that is the quantitative version of the feasibility claim.
  • Editorial inference: a testable extension would be to systematically vary plating density, coating concentration, and the day of media switch to map out a robust operating window for beginners.
  • Editorial inference: cloud-accessible culture platforms could let a biology-focused lab grow cultures while a computation-focused lab analyzes and stimulates them remotely, converting the tutorial's feasibility claim into a division-of-labor model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a tutorial aimed at computational labs that want to enter synthetic biological intelligence (SBI) and organoid intelligence (OI) research. It walks the reader through establishing a cell-culture workspace, procuring and maintaining primary or stem-cell-derived neurons, coating and plating on MEA wells, assessing culture health, selecting MEA hardware, and performing electrophysiological recordings and closed-loop feedback. The authors present their own experience with E18 mouse cortical neurons on MaxOne HD-MEAs and hiPSC-derived neurons on planar MEAs, and they supplement the main text with detailed protocols, a reagent table, and contamination-prevention advice. The central claim is that a group with computational expertise but no biology background can, by following these steps, set up a working SBI lab and obtain usable neural cultures with spontaneous electrophysiological activity.

Significance. If the central claim were backed by systematic evidence, this tutorial would be a valuable contribution: it condenses a large amount of practical know-how, identifies common failure modes (contamination, coating toxicity, media and osmolarity issues), and describes the hardware and software trade-offs for MEA-based SBI. The authors also disclose relevant commercial affiliations and explicitly acknowledge culture-to-culture variability in Section 3.3. However, the paper's feasibility claim is supported only by a small number of illustrative cultures, with no success-rate denominator, no inter-lab replication, and no quantitative definition of a 'usable' culture. The paper is therefore best read as an experience report and a starting checklist, not as a validated protocol.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Figures 6-7] The central claim that a computationally focused lab 'can start working' on SBI is supported by recordings from three MaxOne chips and one planar culture, but the paper gives no trial ledger: it does not report how many cultures were attempted, how many were lost to contamination or quiescence, or how the displayed chips were selected. Section 3.3 itself notes that activity patterns are 'variable both within and between cultures and highly dependent on the methods employed,' so without a denominator the reader cannot estimate the probability that following the protocol will yield a usable culture. Please add the total number of cultures, the outcomes of all attempts, and the inclusion criteria for the chips shown, or explicitly reframe the claim as a single-laboratory illustrative case study.
  2. [Section 2.6, Figure 2 and Table 1] The positive example of an 'adequate culture' and the negative example in Figure 1 are single timelines, and Table 1's recommended reagents and plating schedule are presented without replicate counts or quantitative viability data. Since the tutorial's purpose is to de-risk entry into SBI for new labs, the absence of quantitative success metrics (e.g., percentage of cultures reaching DIV 14 with spontaneous activity, contamination rate) makes the expected yield of the protocol unknown. Please report the number of independent cultures and the distribution of outcomes, or temper the prescriptive recommendations accordingly.
  3. [Section 3.3] The criteria for 'high amount of spontaneous activity' and 'acceptable range' of cell density are not defined. The heatmaps in Figure 7 show firing rates, spike amplitudes, and active electrodes, but no thresholds (e.g., minimum fraction of active electrodes, minimum spike rate, or signal-to-noise requirements) are specified, and the interspike-interval histograms in Figure S4 are descriptive. Without explicit inclusion criteria, the claim that these cultures are representative of typical outcomes is not falsifiable. Please define the quantitative thresholds used to classify a chip as usable and report the range of metrics across all recorded cultures.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.3.2] The sentence beginning 'There different ways of checking on cell viability' should read 'There are different ways of checking on cell viability.'
  2. [Section S2.4] In the fourth numbered item, 'Aliquotes' should be spelled 'Aliquots.'
  3. [Section S2.1.3.1] The abbreviation 'IUCAC' should be 'IACUC' for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
  4. [Section 3.3, Figure 7] The text says 'Figures 7(j-l) show the time interval recorded between bursts' and then refers to 'raster plots in Figures 7(j-l)'; the mapping between panels and the plotted metrics should be clarified.
  5. [Table 1] Several entries in the 'Time (w.r.to DIV0)' column are difficult to parse (for example, 'before -1-0'); reformatting the table with clearer time intervals would improve usability.
  6. [Section 4] In the disease-modeling paragraph, 'Alzheimers and Parkinsons diseases' should include apostrophes: 'Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an experience-based tutorial whose claims are not derived from or defined by their inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a practical tutorial, not a derivational or predictive study, so the standard circularity patterns do not apply. The central claim—that a computationally focused lab can start working on synthetic biological intelligence by following the described wetware and electrophysiology steps—is supported by the authors' own example cultures and recordings (Figures 2, 6, and 7), vendor protocols (Transnetyx and MaxWell Biosystems), and external literature on media, coating, MEA technology, and neural activity. There is no fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction, no equation whose output is its input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem invoked to force a choice. The paper does cite prior work by overlapping authors (e.g., Kagan et al. references [1], [17], [20], [71], [74], [77], [78]) and Cortical Labs employees are co-authors, but these citations are contextual background and are not load-bearing for the tutorial's procedural advice. The manuscript itself acknowledges variability in culture activity, stating in Section 3.3 that "patterns of cell culture spontaneous activity are variable both within and between cultures and highly dependent on the methods employed," which is a limitation for transferability but not evidence of circularity. The absence of a success-rate denominator for Figures 6–7 is an external-validity and reproducibility concern, not a circularity concern, because the figures are illustrative examples rather than validated predictions derived from the protocol. Overall, the derivation chain, such as it is, is self-contained as a procedural guide, and the only mild concern is the presence of non-load-bearing self-citation, which does not make the central claim circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's guidance is grounded in standard cell culture practice and vendor protocols; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced. The main implicit assumptions are domain-level: that neuronal cultures behave as described, that MEA is the right entry tool, and that the authors' example cultures are representative.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Neurons in culture are the appropriate information-processing substrate for SBI.
    Introduction frames SBI as processing via in vitro neural networks; this is a premise of the field, not proven here.
  • domain assumption MEA recording is a suitable and recommended starting point for beginners.
    Section 3.2 recommends MEA based on accessibility, but no comparison with other methods is quantified.
  • domain assumption A diffusion limit of about 300 um determines the maximum organoid radius.
    Section 2.1.5 states nutrient penetration is limited to ~300 um citing [57]; this is an accepted limit but still an assumption from prior work.
  • ad hoc to paper The illustrative cultures in Figure 2 are representative of adequate outcomes.
    The paper generalizes from its own example to say 'with appropriate training and practice, it is possible to obtain such a lively cell culture' (Section 2.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Starting a Synthetic Biological Intelligence Lab from Scratch." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C5AJYJSI

@misc{pith2026241214112,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Starting a Synthetic Biological Intelligence Lab from Scratch},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C5AJYJSI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14112}
}
read the original abstract

With the recent advancements in artificial intelligence, researchers and industries are deploying gigantic models trained on billions of samples. While training these models consumes a huge amount of energy, human brains produce similar outputs (along with other capabilities) with massively lower data and energy requirements. For this reason, more researchers are increasingly considering alternatives. One of these alternatives is known as synthetic biological intelligence, which involves training \textit{in vitro} neurons for goal-directed tasks. This multidisciplinary field requires knowledge of tissue engineering, bio-materials, digital signal processing, computer programming, neuroscience, and even artificial intelligence. The multidisciplinary requirements make starting synthetic biological intelligence research highly non-trivial and time-consuming. Generally, most labs either specialize in the biological aspects or the computational ones. Here, we propose how a lab focusing on computational aspects, including machine learning and device interfacing, can start working on synthetic biological intelligence, including organoid intelligence. We will also discuss computational aspects, which can be helpful for labs that focus on biological research. To facilitate synthetic biological intelligence research, we will describe such a general process step by step, including risks and precautions that could lead to substantial delay or additional cost.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14112 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A timeline of how a primary neural cell culture is destroyed due to contamination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Another timeline of how an adequate primary neural culture could look like with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Healthy hiPSC-based neural cells in post-plating (A) and mature (B) states, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Differentiation of iPSCs to dorsal forebrain progenitors and layer-specific ma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A zoomed-in view of approximately 2D dense neural culture using neural stem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Brightfield images of the three chips, with the electrical activities overlayed. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Heatmaps of firing rates, spike amplitudes, active electrodes, channel-wise raster [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    B. J. Kagan, C. Gyngell, T. Lysaght, V. M. Cole, T. Sawai, J. Savulescu, The technology, opportunities, and challenges of Syn- thetic Biological Intelligence, Biotechnology Advances 68 (2023) 108233. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108233. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0734975023001404

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Smirnova, B

    L. Smirnova, B. S. Caffo, D. H. Gracias, Q. Huang, I. E. Morales Pan- toja, B. Tang, D. J. Zack, C. A. Berlinicke, J. L. Boyd, T. D. Harris, E. C. Johnson, B. J. Kagan, J. Kahn, A. R. Muotri, B. L. Paulhamus, J. C. Schwamborn, J. Plotkin, A. S. Szalay, J. T. Vogelstein, P. F. Worley, T. Hartung, Organoid intelligence (OI): the new frontier in biocomputing...

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Wang, Modeling Neurological Diseases With Human Brain Organoids, Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 10 (2018) 15

    H. Wang, Modeling Neurological Diseases With Human Brain Organoids, Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 10 (2018) 15. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2018.00015

    arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    Tejavibulya, S

    N. Tejavibulya, S. K. Sia, Personalized Disease Models on a Chip, Cell Systems 3 (5) (2016) 416–418. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.11.002. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S2405471216303660

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.11.002 2016

  5. [5]

    Ahsan, N

    T. Ahsan, N. J. Urmi, A. A. Sajib, Heterogeneity in the distribution of 159 drug-response related SNPs in world populations and their genetic relatedness, PloS One 15 (1) (2020) e0228000. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0228000

    doi:10.1371/journal 2020

  6. [6]

    D. M. Roden, A. L. George Jr, The genetic basis of variability in drug responses, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (1) (2002) 37–44, pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/nrd705. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd705

    work page doi:10.1038/nrd705 2002

  7. [7]

    Brown, B

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhari- wal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askell, S. Agarwal, 27 A. Herbert-Voss, G. Krueger, T. Henighan, R. Child, A. Ramesh, D. Ziegler, J. Wu, C. Winter, C. Hesse, M. Chen, E. Sigler, M. Litwin, S. Gray, B. Chess, J. Clark, C. Berner, S. McCandlish, A. Radford, I. Sutskever, D. Amodei...

    2020

  8. [8]

    Ramesh, M

    A. Ramesh, M. Pavlov, G. Goh, S. Gray, C. Voss, A. Radford, M. Chen, I. Sutskever, Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation, in: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2021, pp. 8821–8831, iSSN: 2640-3498. URL https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/ramesh21a.html

    2021

Show all 126 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Liu, K. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Yan, C. Gao, R. Chen, Z. Yuan, Y. Huang, H. Sun, J. Gao, L. He, L. Sun, Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models, arXiv:2402.17177 (Apr. 2024). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.17177. URL http://arxiv.or...

    2024 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    Samsi, D

    S. Samsi, D. Zhao, J. McDonald, B. Li, A. Michaleas, M. Jones, W. Bergeron, J. Kepner, D. Tiwari, V. Gadepally, From Words to Watts: Benchmarking the Energy Costs of Large Language Model Inference, in: 2023 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC), 2023, pp. 1...

    2023

  3. [11]

    W. B. Levy, V. G. Calvert, Computation in the human cerebral cortex uses less than 0.2 watts yet this great expense is optimal when considering communication costs, pages: 2020.04.23.057927 Section: New Results (Apr. 2020). doi:10.1101/2020.04.23.057927. URL https://www.biorxi...

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    D. J. Bakkum, Z. C. Chao, S. M. Potter, Spatio-temporal electrical stimuli shape behavior of an embodied cortical network in a goal- 28 directed learning task, Journal of Neural Engineering 5 (3) (2008) 310–

    2008

  5. [13]

    Tessadori, M

    J. Tessadori, M. Chiappalone, Closed-loop neuro-robotic experiments to test computational properties of neuronal networks, Journal of Vi- sualized Experiments: JoVE (97) (2015) 52341. doi:10.3791/52341

    2015 doi

  6. [14]

    Isomura, K

    T. Isomura, K. Kotani, Y. Jimbo, Cultured Cortical Neurons Can Per- form Blind Source Separation According to the Free-Energy Princi- ple, PLOS Computational Biology 11 (12) (2015) e1004643, publisher: Public Library of Science. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004643. URL https://jo...

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    Friston, The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (2) (2010) 127–138, publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

    K. Friston, The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (2) (2010) 127–138, publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group. doi:10.1038/nrn2787. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn2787

    2010 doi

  8. [16]

    Isomura, K

    T. Isomura, K. Friston, In vitro neural networks minimise variational free energy, Scientific Reports 8 (1) (2018) 16926. doi:10.1038/ s41598-018-35221-w

    2018

  9. [17]

    B. J. Kagan, A. C. Kitchen, N. T. Tran, F. Habibollahi, M. Kha- jehnejad, B. J. Parker, A. Bhat, B. Rollo, A. Razi, K. J. Fris- ton, Invitro neurons learn and exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world, Neuron 110 (23) (2022) 3952–3969.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron....

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Goldwag, G

    J. Goldwag, G. Wang, DishBrain plays Pong and promises more, Na- ture Machine Intelligence 5 (6) (2023) 568–569, publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group. doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00666-w . URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-023-00666-w

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Isomura, K

    T. Isomura, K. Kotani, Y. Jimbo, K. J. Friston, Experimental vali- dation of the free-energy principle with in vitro neural networks, Na- ture Communications 14 (1) (2023) 4547, publisher: Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40141-z . URL https://www.nature.com/art...

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Habibollahi, B

    F. Habibollahi, B. J. Kagan, A. N. Burkitt, C. French, Critical dy- namics arise during structured information presentation within em- bodied in vitro neuronal networks, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 5287, publisher: Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/ s41467-023-41020...

    2023

  13. [21]

    H. Cai, Z. Ao, C. Tian, Z. Wu, H. Liu, J. Tchieu, M. Gu, K. Mackie, F. Guo, Brain organoid reservoir computing for artificial intelligence, Nature Electronics 6 (12) (2023) 1032–1039, publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group. doi:10.1038/s41928-023-01069-w . URL https://www.nature...

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    T. Sumi, H. Yamamoto, Y. Katori, K. Ito, S. Moriya, T. Konno, S. Sato, A. Hirano-Iwata, Biological neurons act as generalization fil- ters in reservoir computing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (25) (2023) e2217008120, publisher: Proceedings of the Nationa...

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Hartung, L

    T. Hartung, L. Smirnova, I. E. Morales Pantoja, A. Akwaboah, D.-M. Alam El Din, C. A. Berlinicke, J. L. Boyd, B. S. Caffo, B. Cappiello, T. Cohen-Karni, J. L. Curley, R. Etienne-Cummings, R. Dastgheyb, D. H. Gracias, F. Gilbert, C. W. Habela, F. Han, T. D. Harris, K. Herrmann,...

    2023

  16. [24]

    I. E. Morales Pantoja, L. Smirnova, A. R. Muotri, K. J. Wahlin, J. Kahn, J. L. Boyd, D. H. Gracias, T. D. Harris, T. Cohen-Karni, B. S. Caffo, A. S. Szalay, F. Han, D. J. Zack, R. Etienne-Cummings, A. Akwaboah, J. C. Romero, D.-M. Alam El Din, J. D. Plotkin, B. L. 30 Paulhamus...

    2023

  17. [25]

    C. Koch, K. Svoboda, A. Bernard, M. A. Basso, A. K. Churchland, A. L. Fairhall, P. A. Groblewski, J. A. Lecoq, Z. F. Mainen, M. W. Mathis, S. R. Olsen, J. W. Phillips, A. Pouget, S. Saxena, J. H. Siegle, A. M. Zador, Next-generation brain observatories, Neuron 110 (22) (2022) ...

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    S. E. de Vries, J. H. Siegle, C. Koch, Sharing neurophysiology data from the Allen Brain Observatory, eLife 12 (2023) e85550, publisher: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd. doi:10.7554/eLife.85550. URL https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85550

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    C. J. Gillon, C. Baker, R. Ly, E. Balzani, B. W. Brunton, M. Schottdorf, S. Ghosh, N. Dehghani, Open Data In Neuro- physiology: Advancements, Solutions & Challenges, ArXiv (2024) arXiv:2407.00976v1. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC11247910/

    2024

  20. [28]

    F. D. Jordan, M. Kutter, J.-M. Comby, F. Brozzi, E. Kurtys, Open and remotely accessible Neuroplatform for research in wetware computing, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 7, publisher: Frontiers (May 2024). doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1376042. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/jou...

    2024

  21. [29]

    M. A. T. Elliott, H. E. Schweiger, A. Robbins, S. Vera-Choqqueccota, D. Ehrlich, S. Hernandez, K. Voitiuk, J. Geng, J. L. Sevetson, 31 C. Core, Y. M. Rosen, M. Teodorescu, N. O. Wagner, D. Haussler, M. A. Mostajo-Radji, Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based S...

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Voitiuk, S

    K. Voitiuk, S. T. Seiler, M. Pessoa de Melo, J. Geng, S. Hernan- dez, H. E. Schweiger, J. L. Sevetson, D. F. Parks, A. Robbins, S. Torres-Montoya, D. Ehrlich, M. A. T. Elliott, T. Sharf, D. Haus- sler, M. A. Mostajo-Radji, S. R. Salama, M. Teodorescu, A feedback- driven IoT mi...

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    Zhang, Z

    X. Zhang, Z. Dou, S. H. Kim, G. Upadhyay, D. Havert, S. Kang, K. Kazemi, K.-Y. Huang, O. Aydin, R. Huang, S. Rahman, A. Ellis- Mohr, H. A. Noblet, K. H. Lim, H. J. Chung, H. J. Gritton, M. T. A. Saif, H. J. Kong, J. M. Beggs, M. Gazzola, Mind In Vitro Platforms: Versatile, Sca...

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    H. W. Chong, B. J. Kagan, A. C. Kitchen, System and method for training in vitro neurons (May 2023). URL https://patents.google.com/patent/US20230133430A1/en

    2023

  25. [33]

    Bray, Wetware: a computer in every living cell, Yale University Press, 2009

    D. Bray, Wetware: a computer in every living cell, Yale University Press, 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    Mukherjee, P

    S. Mukherjee, P. Malik, T. K. Mukherjee, Establishment of a Cell Culture Laboratory, in: T. K. Mukherjee, P. Malik, S. Mukher- jee (Eds.), Practical Approach to Mammalian Cell and Organ Cul- ture, Springer Nature, Singapore, 2023, pp. 43–82. doi:10.1007/ 978-981-19-1731-8_2-1 ...

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    M. A. Harrison, I. F. Rae, General Techniques of Cell Culture, Handbooks in Practical Animal Cell Biology, Cambridge University 32 Press, Cambridge, 1997. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511623226. URL https://www.cambridge.org/core/ books/general-techniques-of-cell-culture/ 7BC2BBE04CAD33...

    1997 doi

  28. [36]

    Geraghty, A

    R. Geraghty, A. Capes-Davis, J. Davis, J. Downward, R. Freshney, I. Knezevic, R. Lovell-Badge, J. Masters, J. Meredith, G. Stacey, et al., Guidelines for the use of cell lines in biomedical research, British journal of cancer 111 (6) (2014) 1021–1046

    2014

  29. [37]

    D. Engber, The trouble with Black-6: A tiny alcoholic takes over the lab., https://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/ the_mouse_trap/2011/11/black_6_lab_mice_and_the_history_ of_biomedical_research.html, accessed: 2024-07-19 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    Q. Wang, M. A. Timberlake, K. Prall, Y. Dwivedi, The Re- cent Progress in Animal Models of Depression, Progress in neuro- psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry 77 (2017) 99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.008. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5605906/

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    A. A. Pollen, A. Bhaduri, M. G. Andrews, T. J. Nowakowski, O. S. Meyerson, M. A. Mostajo-Radji, E. Di Lullo, B. Alvarado, M. Bedolli, M. L. Dougherty, I. T. Fiddes, Z. N. Kronenberg, J. Shuga, A. A. Leyrat, J. A. West, M. Bershteyn, C. B. Lowe, B. J. Pavlovic, S. R. Salama, D....

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Faltin, Z

    J. Faltin, Z. Lodin, J. Hartman, B. Foucaud, G. Gombos, M. Sensen- brenner, Morphological maturation and survival of chicken and rat embryonic neurons on different culture substrata, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 3 (2) (1985) 111–121. doi:10.1016/0736-574...

    1985 doi

  33. [41]

    M. G. Andrews, L. Subramanian, A. R. Kriegstein, mTOR signaling regulates the morphology and migration of outer radial glia in develop- ing human cortex, eLife 9 (2020) e58737. doi:10.7554/eLife.58737. 33

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Perillo, A

    M. Perillo, A. Punzo, C. Caliceti, C. Sell, A. Lorenzini, The sponta- neous immortalization probability of mammalian cell culture strains, as their proliferative capacity, correlates with species body mass, not longevity, Biomedical Journal 46 (3) (2023) 100596. doi:10.1016/j....

    2023

  35. [43]

    Voloshin, P

    N. Voloshin, P. Tyurin-Kuzmin, M. Karagyaur, Z. Akopyan, K. Kule- byakin, Practical Use of Immortalized Cells in Medicine: Current Ad- vances and Future Perspectives, International Journal of Molecular Sci- ences 24 (16) (2023) 12716. doi:10.3390/ijms241612716

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Calles, I

    K. Calles, I. Svensson, E. Lindskog, L. Hggstrm, Effects of con- ditioned medium factors and passage number on Sf9 cell physiol- ogy and productivity, Biotechnology Progress 22 (2) (2006) 394–400. doi:10.1021/bp050297a

    2006 doi

  37. [45]

    H. Wang, P. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Bao, W. Qian, J. Wu, Z. Xing, X. Hu, K. Jin, Q. Zhuge, J. Yang, NeuroD4 converts glioblastoma cells into neuron-like cells through the SLC7A11-GSH-GPX4 antioxidant axis, Cell Death Discovery 9 (1) (2023) 1–12, publisher: Nature Pub- lish...

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Zhang, C

    Y. Zhang, C. Pak, Y. Han, H. Ahlenius, Z. Zhang, S. Chanda, S. Marro, C. Patzke, C. Acuna, J. Covy, W. Xu, N. Yang, T. Danko, L. Chen, M. Wernig, T. C. Sdhof, Rapid Single-Step Induction of Functional Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells, Neuron 78 (5) (2013) 785–798, pub...

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    B.-Y. Hu, J. P. Weick, J. Yu, L.-X. Ma, X.-Q. Zhang, J. A. Thomson, S.-C. Zhang, Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of...

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    I. Song, A. Dityatev, Crosstalk between glia, extracellular matrix and neurons, Brain Research Bulletin 136 (2018) 101–108. doi:10.1016/ j.brainresbull.2017.03.003. 34

    2018

  41. [49]

    D. Liu, N. Pavathuparambil Abdul Manaph, M. Al-Hawwas, L. Bo- brovskaya, L.-L. Xiong, X.-F. Zhou, Coating Materials for Neural Stem/Progenitor Cell Culture and Differentiation, Stem Cells and De- velopment 29 (8) (2020) 463–474. doi:10.1089/scd.2019.0288

    2020

  42. [50]

    Egert, T

    U. Egert, T. Meyer, Heart on a Chip Extracellular Multielectrode Recordings from Cardiac Myocytes in Vitro, in: S. Dhein, F. W. Mohr, M. Delmar (Eds.), Practical Methods in Cardiovascular Re- search, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 432–453. doi:10.1007/ 3-540-26574-0_2...

    2005 doi

  43. [51]

    J. Chad, H. Wheal (Eds.), Cellular Neurobiology: A Practical Ap- proach, 0th Edition, IRL Press, Oxford, 1991

    1991

  44. [52]

    Duval, H

    K. Duval, H. Grover, L.-H. Han, Y. Mou, A. F. Pegoraro, J. Fredberg, Z. Chen, Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture, Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) 32 (4) (2017) 266–277. doi:10.1152/ physiol.00036.2016

    2017

  45. [53]

    Verma, M

    A. Verma, M. Verma, A. Singh, Animal tissue culture principles and applications, Animal Biotechnology (2020) 269–293 doi:10.1016/ B978-0-12-811710-1.00012-4 . URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7325846/

    2020

  46. [54]

    M. C. LaPlaca, V. N. Vernekar, J. T. Shoemaker, D. K. Cullen, W. Coulter, Three-dimensional neuronal cultures, Methods in bioengi- neering: 3D tissue engineering (2010) 187–204

    2010

  47. [55]

    M. A. Lancaster, J. A. Knoblich, Organogenesis in a dish: Modeling de- velopment and disease using organoid technologies, Science 345 (6194) (2014) 1247125, publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science. doi:10.1126/science.1247125. URL https://www.science.org...

    2014 doi

  48. [56]

    T. K. Matsui, Y. Tsuru, K. Hasegawa, K.-I. Kuwako, Vascularization of human brain organoids, Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 39 (8) (2021) 1017–1024. doi:10.1002/stem.3368

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    Zhang, Z

    S. Zhang, Z. Wan, R. D. Kamm, Vascularized organoids on a chip: strategies for engineering organoids with functional vasculature, Lab 35 on a Chip 21 (3) (2021) 473–488, publisher: The Royal Society of Chemistry. doi:10.1039/D0LC01186J. URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/arti...

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    M. A. Aras, K. A. Hartnett, E. Aizenman, Assessment of cell viabil- ity in primary neuronal cultures, Current Protocols in Neuroscience Chapter 7 (2008) Unit 7.18. doi:10.1002/0471142301.ns0718s44

    2008 doi

  51. [59]

    Pathak, E

    S. Pathak, E. Cao, M. C. Davidson, S. Jin, G. A. Silva, Quantum Dot Applications to Neuroscience: New Tools for Probing Neurons and Glia, The Journal of Neuroscience 26 (7) (2006) 1893–1895. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3847-05.2006. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6674918/

    2006 doi

  52. [60]

    S. P. Langdon, Cell culture contamination: an overview, Meth- ods in Molecular Medicine 88 (2004) 309–317. doi:10.1385/ 1-59259-406-9:309

    2004

  53. [61]

    W. A. Nelson-Rees, Responsibility for truth in research., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 356 (1410) (2001) 849–851. doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0873. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1088478/

    2001

  54. [62]

    Y. Nam, B. C. Wheeler, In vitro microelectrode array technology and neural recordings, Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 39 (1) (2011) 45–61. doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v39.i1.40

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    M. A. Cameron, O. Kekesi, J. W. Morley, A. Bellot-Saez, S. Kueh, P. Breen, A. van Schaik, J. Tapson, Y. Buskila, Prolonged Incubation of Acute Neuronal Tissue for Electrophysiology and Calcium-imaging, Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE (120) (2017) 55396. doi: 10.3791/5...

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    Grdem, I

    S. Grdem, I. Nymoen, G. H. Vatne, F. S. Rogge, V. Bjrnsdttir, K. K. Lensj, M. Fyhn, An updated suite of viral vectors for in vivo calcium imaging using intracerebral and retro-orbital injections in male mice, Nature Communications 14 (1) (2023) 608, publisher: Nature Publish- ...

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    S. D. Antic, R. M. Empson, T. Knpfel, Voltage imaging to understand connections and functions of neuronal circuits, Journal of Neurophysi- ology 116 (1) (2016) 135–152. doi:10.1152/jn.00226.2016

    2016

  58. [66]

    Y. Adam, J. J. Kim, S. Lou, Y. Zhao, M. E. Xie, D. Brinks, H. Wu, M. A. Mostajo-Radji, S. Kheifets, V. Parot, S. Chettih, K. J. Williams, B. Gmeiner, S. L. Farhi, L. Madisen, E. K. Buchanan, I. Kinsella, D. Zhou, L. Paninski, C. D. Harvey, H. Zeng, P. Ar- lotta, R. E. Campbell...

    2019 doi

  59. [67]

    J. J. Jun, N. A. Steinmetz, J. H. Siegle, D. J. Denman, M. Bauza, B. Barbarits, A. K. Lee, C. A. Anastassiou, A. Andrei, . Aydn, M. Barbic, T. J. Blanche, V. Bonin, J. Couto, B. Dutta, S. L. Gratiy, D. A. Gutnisky, M. Husser, B. Karsh, P. Ledochowitsch, C. M. Lopez, C. Mitelut...

    2017

  60. [68]

    D. A. Wagenaar, J. Pine, S. M. Potter, An extremely rich repertoire of bursting patterns during the development of cortical cultures, BMC Neuroscience 7 (1) (2006) 11. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-7-11 . URL https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-11

    2006 doi

  61. [69]

    Mller, D

    J. Mller, D. J. Bakkum, A. Hierlemann, Sub-millisecond closed-loop feedback stimulation between arbitrary sets of individual neurons, Frontiers in Neural Circuits 6 (2012) 121. doi:10.3389/fncir.2012. 00121

    2012 doi

  62. [70]

    J. P. Newman, R. Zeller-Townson, M.-F. Fong, S. Arcot Desai, R. E. Gross, S. M. Potter, Closed-Loop, Multichannel Experimentation Us- ing the Open-Source NeuroRighter Electrophysiology Platform, Fron- tiers in Neural Circuits 6 (2012) 98. doi:10.3389/fncir.2012.00098. 37

    2012 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Meet the man with 20 brains powering this game-changing aussie start-up, https://www.forbes.com.au/news/innovation/ meet-the-man-with-20-brains-powering-this-game-changing-aussie-start-up/ , accessed: 2024-07-19 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Y. Li, P. Tang, S. Cai, J. Peng, G. Hua, Organoid based personalized medicine: from bench to bedside, Cell Regeneration (London, England) 9 (1) (2020) 21. doi:10.1186/s13619-020-00059-z

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    A. P. Haring, H. Sontheimer, B. N. Johnson, Microphysiological Hu- man Brain and Neural Systems-on-a-Chip: Potential Alternatives to Small Animal Models and Emerging Platforms for Drug Discovery and Personalized Medicine, Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 13 (3) (2017) 381–406. do...

    2017 doi

  66. [74]

    B. J. Kagan, A. Razi, A. Bhat, A. C. Kitchen, N. T. Tran, F. Habibol- lahi, M. Khajehnejad, B. J. Parker, B. Rollo, K. J. Friston, Scientific communication and the semantics of sentience, Neuron 111 (5) (2023) 606–607. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.02.008

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    Pereira, J

    A. Pereira, J. W. Garcia, A. Muotri, Neural Stimulation of Brain Organoids with Dynamic Patterns: A Sentiomics Approach Directed to Regenerative Neuromedicine, NeuroSci 4 (1) (2023) 31–42, num- ber: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. doi: 10.3390/neur...

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    B. J. Kagan, M. Mahlis, A. Bhat, J. Bongard, V. M. Cole, P. Cor- lett, C. Gyngell, T. Hartung, B. Jupp, M. Levin, T. Lysaght, N. Opie, A. Razi, L. Smirnova, I. Tennant, P. T. Wade, G. Wang, Toward a nomenclature consensus for diverse intelligent systems: Call for collaboration...

    2024

  69. [78]

    B. J. Kagan, A. Loeffler, J. L. Boyd, J. Savulescu, Embodied Neu- ral Systems Can Enable Iterative Investigations of Morally Relevant States, Journal of Neuroscience 44 (15), publisher: Society for Neuro- science Section: Commentary (Apr. 2024). doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI. 0431-24....

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    O’Connor, L

    R. O’Connor, L. O’Driscoll, Setting up a cell culture laboratory, in: Cell Biology, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 5–11

    2006

  71. [80]

    J. Y. Richmond, R. W. McKinney, Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories, US Government Printing Office, 2009

    2009

  72. [81]

    Goodman, Centrifuge rotor selection and maintenance, American laboratory 39 (12) (2007) 12

    T. Goodman, Centrifuge rotor selection and maintenance, American laboratory 39 (12) (2007) 12

    2007

  73. [82]

    A. I. Petrov, M. V. Razuvaeva, Effect of Temperature on Metabolism and Lifespan in Several Homeothermic Animals, Technical Physics 63 (10) (2018) 1410–1414. doi:10.1134/S1063784218100183. URL https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784218100183

    2018 doi

  74. [83]

    I. I. Geneva, B. Cuzzo, T. Fazili, W. Javaid, Normal Body Temper- ature: A Systematic Review, Open Forum Infectious Diseases 6 (4) (2019) ofz032. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz032

    2019 doi

  75. [84]

    culturecollections.org.uk/culture-collection-news/ co2-concentration-and-ph-control-in-the-cell-culture-laboratory/ , accessed: July 19, 2024

    UK Health Security Agency, CO 2 concentration and pH control in the cell culture laboratory, https://www. culturecollections.org.uk/culture-collection-news/ co2-concentration-and-ph-control-in-the-cell-culture-laboratory/ , accessed: July 19, 2024

    2024

  76. [85]

    Mestres, M

    E. Mestres, M. Garca-Jimnez, A. Casals, J. Cohen, M. Acacio, A. Vil- lamar, Q. Matia-Algu, G. Caldern, N. Costa-Borges, Factors of the human embryo culture system that may affect media evaporation and osmolality, Human Reproduction 36 (3) (2021) 605–613. doi: 10.1093/humrep/de...

    2021 doi

  77. [86]

    Application note 12: Avoiding evaporation: Humidity control in cell culture, https://ibidi.com/img/cms/support/AN/AN12_Avoiding_ evaporation.pdf, accessed: 2024-07-19 (2022). 39

    2022

  78. [87]

    Chakrabarti, Z

    L. Chakrabarti, Z. Galdzicki, T. F. Haydar, Defects in embryonic neu- rogenesis and initial synapse formation in the forebrain of the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome, The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27 (43) (2007) 11483– 11...

    2007 doi

  79. [88]

    S. B. Dumanis, H.-J. Cha, J. M. Song, J. H. Trotter, M. Spitzer, J.-Y. Lee, E. J. Weeber, R. S. Turner, D. T. S. Pak, G. W. Rebeck, H.-S. Hoe, ApoE receptor 2 regulates synapse and dendritic spine formation, PloS One 6 (2) (2011) e17203. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017203

    2011 doi

  80. [89]

    E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. M. Jessell, S. A. Siegelbaum, A. J. Hudspeth (Eds.), Principles of Neural Science, Fifth Edition, 5th Edi- tion, McGraw-Hill Education / Medical, New York, 2012

    2012

  81. [90]

    T. L. Gilbert, L. Ng, Chapter 3 - The Allen Brain Atlas: Toward Understanding Brain Behavior and Function Through Data Acqui- sition, Visualization, Analysis, and Integration, in: R. T. Gerlai (Ed.), Molecular-Genetic and Statistical Techniques for Behavioral and Neural Resear...

    2018 doi

  82. [91]

    C. L. Thompson, L. Ng, V. Menon, S. Martinez, C.-K. Lee, K. Glat- tfelder, S. M. Sunkin, A. Henry, C. Lau, C. Dang, R. Garcia-Lopez, A. Martinez-Ferre, A. Pombero, J. L. R. Rubenstein, W. B. Wake- man, J. Hohmann, N. Dee, A. J. Sodt, R. Young, K. Smith, T.-N. Nguyen, J. Kidney...

    2014

  83. [92]

    Kamioka, E

    H. Kamioka, E. Maeda, Y. Jimbo, H. P. Robinson, A. Kawana, Sponta- neous periodic synchronized bursting during formation of mature pat- terns of connections in cortical cultures, Neuroscience Letters 206 (2-3) (1996) 109–112. doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(96)12448-4 . 40

    1996 doi

  84. [93]

    H. J. Curzer, G. Perry, M. C. Wallace, D. Perry, The Three Rs of Animal Research: What they Mean for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Why, Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2) (2016) 549–565. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9659-8

    2016 doi

  85. [94]

    Bhaduri, E

    A. Bhaduri, E. Di Lullo, D. Jung, S. Mller, E. E. Crouch, C. S. Es- pinosa, T. Ozawa, B. Alvarado, J. Spatazza, C. R. Cadwell, G. Wilkins, D. Velmeshev, S. J. Liu, M. Malatesta, M. G. Andrews, M. A. Mostajo- Radji, E. J. Huang, T. J. Nowakowski, D. A. Lim, A. Diaz, D. R. Ralei...

    2020 doi

  86. [95]

    Kumar, A

    M. Kumar, A. Katyal, Data on retinoic acid and reduced serum concen- tration induced differentiation of Neuro-2a neuroblastoma cells, Data in Brief 21 (2018) 2435–2440. doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.097

    2018 doi

  87. [96]

    Velasco, A

    S. Velasco, A. J. Kedaigle, S. K. Simmons, A. Nash, M. Rocha, G. Quadrato, B. Paulsen, L. Nguyen, X. Adiconis, A. Regev, J. Z. Levin, P. Arlotta, Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex, Nature 570 (7762) (2019) 523–527, publish...

    2019

  88. [97]

    T. J. Nowakowski, S. R. Salama, Cerebral Organoids as an Experi- mental Platform for Human Neurogenomics, Cells 11 (18) (2022) 2803. doi:10.3390/cells11182803

    2022 doi

  89. [98]

    N. D. Amin, K. W. Kelley, J. Hao, Y. Miura, G. Narazaki, T. Li, P. Mc- Queen, S. Kulkarni, S. Pavlov, S. P. Paca, Generating human neural diversity with a multiplexed morphogen screen in organoids, bioRxiv: The Preprint Server for Biology (2023) 2023.05.31.541819 doi:10. 1101/...

    2023

  90. [99]

    Zettler, L

    P. Zettler, L. E. Wolf, B. Lo, Establishing procedures for institutional oversight of stem cell research, Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 82 (1) (2007) 6–10. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000250025.17863.bf. 41

    2007

  91. [100]

    T. K. Yoshiki Sasai, Self-organization of axial polarity, inside-out layer pattern, and species-specific progenitor dynamics in human ES cellderived neocortex, iSBN: 9781315710112. URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1315710110

    doi

  92. [101]

    Eiraku, K

    M. Eiraku, K. Watanabe, M. Matsuo-Takasaki, M. Kawada, S. Yone- mura, M. Matsumura, T. Wataya, A. Nishiyama, K. Muguruma, Y. Sa- sai, Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals, Cell Stem Cell 3 (5) (2008) ...

    2008 doi

  93. [102]

    Sasai, Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architec- ture, Nature 493 (7432) (2013) 318–326, publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    Y. Sasai, Cytosystems dynamics in self-organization of tissue architec- ture, Nature 493 (7432) (2013) 318–326, publisher: Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/nature11859. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11859

    2013 doi

  94. [103]

    G. J. Brewer, T. T. Jones, M. D. Boehler, B. C. Wheeler, NbAc- tiv4 medium improvement to Neurobasal/B27 increases neuron synapse densities and network spike rates on multielectrode arrays, Journal of neuroscience methods 170 (2) (2008) 181–187. doi:10.1016/j. jneumeth.2008.01...

    2008 doi

  95. [104]

    Bardy, M

    C. Bardy, M. van den Hurk, T. Eames, C. Marchand, R. V. Hernan- dez, M. Kellogg, M. Gorris, B. Galet, V. Palomares, J. Brown, A. G. Bang, J. Mertens, L. Bhnke, L. Boyer, S. Simon, F. H. Gage, Neuronal medium that supports basic synaptic functions and activity of human neurons ...

    2015 doi

  96. [105]

    Ghosh, J

    A. Ghosh, J. Carnahan, M. E. Greenberg, Requirement for BDNF in activity-dependent survival of cortical neurons, Science (New York, N.Y.) 263 (5153) (1994) 1618–1623. doi:10.1126/science.7907431

    1994 doi

  97. [106]

    Y. Park, S. Hernandez, C. O. Hernandez, H. E. Schweiger, H. Li, K. Voitiuk, H. Dechiraju, N. Hawthorne, E. M. Muzzy, J. A. Selberg, F. N. Sullivan, R. Urcuyo, S. R. Salama, E. Aslankoohi, H. J. Knight, M. Teodorescu, M. A. Mostajo-Radji, M. Rolandi, Modulation of 42 neuronal a...

    2024

  98. [107]

    Quadrato, T

    G. Quadrato, T. Nguyen, E. Z. Macosko, J. L. Sherwood, S. Min Yang, D. R. Berger, N. Maria, J. Scholvin, M. Goldman, J. P. Kinney, E. S. Boyden, J. W. Lichtman, Z. M. Williams, S. A. McCarroll, P. Arlotta, Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organ...

    2017 doi

  99. [108]

    Petasch, B

    W. Petasch, B. Kegel, H. Schmid, K. Lendenmann, H. U. Keller, Low-pressure plasma cleaning: a process for precision cleaning ap- plications, Surface and Coatings Technology 97 (1) (1997) 176–181. doi:10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00143-6 . URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...

    1997 doi

  100. [109]

    G. J. Brewer, J. R. Torricelli, E. K. Evege, P. J. Price, Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27-supplemented Neurobasal, a new serum-free medium combination, Journal of Neuroscience Research 35 (5) (1993) 567–576. doi:10.1002/jnr.490350513

    1993 doi

  101. [110]

    H. G. Drexler, C. C. Uphoff, Mycoplasma contamination of cell cul- tures: Incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention, Cytotechnology 39 (2) (2002) 75–90. doi:10.1023/A:1022913015916

    2002 doi

  102. [111]

    J. Gao, C. Liao, S. Liu, T. Xia, G. Jiang, Nanotechnology: new oppor- tunities for the development of patch-clamps, Journal of Nanobiotech- nology 19 (1) (2021) 97. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00841-4

    2021 doi

  103. [112]

    G. Hong, C. M. Lieber, Novel electrode technologies for neural record- ings, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 20 (6) (2019) 330–345, publisher: Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6 . URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-019-0140-6 43

    2019 doi

  104. [113]

    Sileo, F

    L. Sileo, F. Pisanello, L. Quarta, A. Maccione, A. Simi, L. Berdondini, M. De Vittorio, L. Martiradonna, Electrical coupling of mammalian neurons to microelectrodes with 3D nanoprotrusions, Microelectronic Engineering 111 (2013) 384–390. doi:10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.152. URL http...

    2013 doi

  105. [114]

    Steins, M

    H. Steins, M. Mierzejewski, L. Brauns, A. Stumpf, A. Kohler, G. Heusel, A. Corna, T. Herrmann, P. D. Jones, G. Zeck, R. von Metzen, T. Stieglitz, A flexible protruding microelectrode array for neural interfacing in bioelectronic medicine, Microsystems & Nano- engineering 8 (1)...

    2022 doi

  106. [115]

    D. H. Ko, D. Bates, H. Karaosmanoglu, K. Taredun, C. Elton, L. Jones, A. Hosseini, A. Partridge, 3D microelectrode arrays, push- ing the bounds of sensitivity toward a generic platform for point- of-care diagnostics, Biosensors & Bioelectronics 227 (2023) 115154. doi:10.1016/j...

    2023

  107. [116]

    J. C. Mateus, C. D. F. Lopes, M. Cerquido, L. Leito, D. Leito, S. Car- doso, J. Ventura, P. Aguiar, Improved in vitro electrophysiology using 3D-structured microelectrode arrays with a micro-mushrooms islets ar- chitecture capable of promoting topotaxis, Journal of Neural Engi...

    2019 doi

  108. [117]

    Muzzi, D

    L. Muzzi, D. Di Lisa, M. Falappa, S. Pepe, A. Maccione, L. Pastorino, S. Martinoia, M. Frega, Human-Derived Cortical Neurospheroids Cou- pled to Passive, High-Density and 3D MEAs: A Valid Platform for Functional Tests, Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) 10 (4) (2023)

    2023

  109. [118]

    D. A. Soscia, D. Lam, A. C. Tooker, H. A. Enright, M. Triplett, P. Karande, S. K. G. Peters, A. P. Sales, E. K. Wheeler, N. O. Fischer, A flexible 3-dimensional microelectrode array for in vitro brain models, Lab on a Chip 20 (5) (2020) 901–911. doi:10.1039/c9lc01148j

    2020 doi

  110. [119]

    M¨ uller, M

    J. M¨ uller, M. Ballini, P. Livi, Y. Chen, M. Radivojevic, A. Shad- mani, V. Viswam, I. L. Jones, M. Fiscella, R. Diggelmann, A. Stettler, 44 U. Frey, D. J. Bakkum, A. Hierlemann, High-resolution CMOS MEA platform to study neurons at subcellular, cellular, and network levels, ...

    2015

  111. [122]

    After turning it off, switch on the airflow and raise the glass to its designated height (an alarm will sound if it exceeds the limit)

    Biosafety cabinet being unsterile : This situation can be prevented by turning on the UV light inside the biosafety cabinet for 10-15 minutes before use. After turning it off, switch on the airflow and raise the glass to its designated height (an alarm will sound if it exceeds...

  112. [123]

    MEA wells should be placed in a sealed Petri dish to prevent evaporation

    Cells exposed to airborne contaminants while moving them around : To prevent this from happening, we should always transport cultures in a sealed, disinfected carrier box or seal culture plates and tubes with parafilm. MEA wells should be placed in a sealed Petri dish to preve...

  113. [124]

    To minimize this, we need to spray all non-paper items with 70% ethanol, paying extra attention to the 59 bottoms

    Microbes getting inside the biosafety cabinet through equipment from outside : Even with precautions, contaminants can enter through the surfaces of gloves, lab coats, and equipment. To minimize this, we need to spray all non-paper items with 70% ethanol, paying extra attentio...

  114. [125]

    Aliquotes can be prepared for long-term storage, and proper stor- age instructions should be followed, as mentioned in Subsection 2.5, to maximize their utility and shelf life

    Reagents and consumables past their expiration date : Finally, please do not use any expired reagent or consumable equipment for any cell cul- ture. Aliquotes can be prepared for long-term storage, and proper stor- age instructions should be followed, as mentioned in Subsectio...

  115. [126]

    This tech- nique allows researchers to measure the membrane potential, including detailed dynamics of action potentials and subthreshold activities, such as synaptic potentials

    Intracellular recording: Intracellular recording refers to the measure- ment of electrical signals from inside a neuron or other cell. This tech- nique allows researchers to measure the membrane potential, including detailed dynamics of action potentials and subthreshold activ...

  116. [127]

    Extracellular recording: Extracellular recording involves placing an elec- trode outside a cell, usually in close proximity to the neurons of interest. Instead of measuring the membrane potential, this technique detects changes in the electric field generated by the collective...

  117. [323]

    doi:10.1088/1741-2560/5/3/004

    doi

  118. [449]

    doi:10.3390/bioengineering10040449

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.