Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 54 references

Glandular Trichome Rupture in Tomato Plants is an Ultra-Fast & Sensitive Defense Mechanism Against Insects

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that type VI glandular trichomes on tomato plants rupture at forces of 1.4–23.8 µN (mean 7±4 µN) and release their solvent payload in under one millisecond, and that thrips larvae trigger this burst in real time, making…

desk verdict A solid set of new direct measurements (rupture force, sub-ms release, thrips triggering) wrapped in over-interpreted beam-theory claims that should be dialed back before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14507 v1 pith:7IOLWMSB submitted 2024-12-19 physics.bio-ph

classification physics.bio-ph
keywords glandulartrichomestypeVItomatodefenseplantbiomechanicsruptureforcehigh-speedimagingthripsplant-insectinteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper measures, for the first time, the force and speed with which type VI glandular trichomes on tomato plants burst open. The central claims are that rupture happens at remarkably small forces—1.4 to 23.8 µN, mean 7±4 µN—and that the stored solvent is fully released in under one millisecond, making this one of the fastest known plant movements. The authors show the rupture always originates at a pre-weakened junction between the glandular head and the intermediate cell, and they observe Western flower thrips larvae triggering the burst in real time and getting entangled in the sticky, filament-forming secretion. If these claims hold, glandular trichomes are not just chemical factories but ultra-fast, low-threshold mechanical traps that filter out pests by size and leg force.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three experimental tools and one mechanical model. Micropipette force sensors calibrated as cantilevers measure the applied force $F(t)=k\,\Delta x(t)$ during loading; high-speed imaging at 28,000 fps resolves the sub-millisecond release; and capillary-flow measurements through the same pipette give a Washburn-based viscosity estimate of order 0.1–1 Pa·s. The mechanical model treats the trichome as an Euler–Bernoulli cantilever with the junction as a circular cross-section of radius $R$, axial second moment $I_z=\pi R^4/4$, and critical bending stress $\sigma_c=R\,\tau_r/I_z$, which converts measured rupture forces into intrinsic material stresses. The dimensionless Reynolds, Weber, and Bond numbers show the released fluid is in a surface-tension-dominated regime, explaining why the solvent forms a wetting droplet and sticky filaments rather than a spray.

What would settle it

Track the deformation of the glandular-intermediate junction in three dimensions during loading—for example with strain-marker beads or finite-element simulation using measured cell-wall geometry—and check whether the rupture initiation site and critical stress match the cantilever prediction; if the junction fails by shear or local buckling rather than bending at the outer fiber, the model's stresses are wrong. A second decisive experiment would be to measure the leg forces of a pest smaller than L2 thrips (e.g., the tomato russet mite) and see whether it ruptures trichomes despite exerting forces below the measured 1.4 µN minimum.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core discovery is that the glandular head of a type VI tomato trichome behaves as a brittle cantilever with a mechanically weak plane at the glandular-intermediate cell junction: under bending it fails suddenly, releasing the entire solvent cavity in less than 1 ms, with no jetting or spray because surface tension dominates (Re ~ 0.01–0.1, We ~ $10^{-3}$–$10^{-2}$, Bo ~ $10^{-5}$–$10^{-4}$). The force curves from 84 ruptures collapse onto a single normalized curve, indicating a universal brittle-fracture mechanism. Cultivar tomato stem trichomes rupture at significantly higher force and higher computed critical stress than wild-type (S. habrochaites) trichomes or leaf trichomes, which the authors interpret as an unintended consequence of breeding for fruit traits. In situ videos show L2 thrips larvae rupturing trichomes and accumulating a viscous (≳0.1 Pa·s) solvent that forms long filaments and impedes movement, demonstrating the defense works against a real pest.

Load-bearing premise

The species differences in rupture are interpreted as intrinsic structural properties only because the junction is modeled as a homogeneous Euler-Bernoulli cantilever with circular cross-section; if the local geometry, material inhomogeneity, or failure mode departs from simple bending at the outer fiber, the computed critical stresses and the inferred differences could be artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pests at or above the size of L2 thrips larvae (~0.7 mm) can rupture trichomes through normal locomotion; the shaded size table suggests most common tomato pests fall in this group, while the smallest mites may slip through.
  • Because cultivar stem trichomes are significantly harder to rupture, breeding programs aiming to restore pest resistance may need to select for lower rupture force or junction stress, not just higher trichome density or solvent chemistry.
  • Sub-millisecond solvent release means the chemical defense is co-deployed with a mechanical one almost instantly, so herbivores receive both a toxic dose and a sticky barrier before they can feed.
  • The universal loading-curve collapse means the rupture process is robust to trichome size and species; modifying the junction's material properties should predictably shift the force threshold.
  • The high solvent viscosity and filament formation imply that even if the solvent is not immediately toxic, it can immobilize small insects by adhesion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The size-threshold argument implies a sharp ecological filter: pests below roughly 0.3 mm should evade rupture, while those above ~0.7 mm should trigger it; this is a prediction one could test by measuring leg forces in single insects, not something the paper measured.
  • The cultivar-versus-wild difference hints that domestication may have inadvertently weakened an evolved physical defense; a breeding program could use critical stress $\sigma_c$ as a selection index, but this would require showing that $\sigma_c$ correlates with field resistance.
  • The viscosity estimate of 0.1–1 Pa·s, if confirmed with proper rheometry, would place tomato trichome solvent in the same mechanical regime as pitcher-plant fluids, suggesting convergent evolution of viscoelastic trapping—an extension the paper raises but does not test.
  • A direct follow-up would be to test whether evaporation of volatile terpenes rapidly increases solvent viscosity after rupture, which would make entrapment stronger over time and might explain the observed filament behavior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports direct mechanical measurements of rupture of type VI glandular trichomes in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and wild tomato (Solanum habrochaites), using calibrated micropipette force sensors and high-speed imaging at up to 28,000 fps. The authors report that rupture consistently originates at the junction between the glandular cells and the intermediate cell, occurs at forces of 1.4–23.8 µN (mean 7±4 µN), and releases the entire solvent contents in under 1 ms after the onset of detectable rupture. They further observe L2 larvae of Western flower thrips inadvertently triggering trichome rupture and becoming entangled in the secreted solvent. Based on a collapse of normalized force–time loading curves and on an Euler–Bernoulli beam model for the critical stress, the authors conclude that the rupture follows a universal brittle-fracture mechanism and that species/location differences in critical stress reflect intrinsic structural properties of the trichome junction.

Significance. The direct experimental quantities—rupture forces in the micro-Newton range, sub-millisecond solvent release, and the demonstration that tiny thrips larvae can trigger rupture—are novel and valuable for understanding plant–insect interactions and for potential agricultural applications. The high-speed imaging data and the in situ behavioral observations with thrips are strong assets. The paper also provides calibration code and openly describes the measurement protocol, which supports reproducibility. However, the paper's central mechanistic interpretations are not yet supported: the normalized force-curve collapse is trivially expected for linearly elastic loading, and the critical-stress calculation rests on an idealized beam model for a complex cellular junction. These issues are load-bearing for the claims of a 'universal fracture mechanism' and of 'intrinsic structural properties' governing species differences, so the manuscript requires substantial revision before the interpretive conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Mechanically Weak Cell Junction..., Fig. 2C inset] The collapse of the loading curves when normalized by F_r and t_r is a mathematical identity for any linearly elastic loading curve: if F(t) = k_eff * t before failure, then F/F_r = t/t_r identically. Because the raw curves in Fig. 2C are visibly linear up to the point of rupture, the observed collapse does not provide evidence for a 'universal fracture mechanism' or for brittle fracture. To support the mechanistic claim, the authors should quantify the collapse beyond the trivial rescaling—for example, by testing whether the measured curves deviate systematically from a linear ramp or by reporting residual analysis—or they should soften the interpretation to 'similar elastic loading followed by sudden failure.'
  2. [Mechanically Weak Cell Junction..., Eq. (5) and Fig. 2E] The critical stress σc = 4τr/(πR^3) is derived from an Euler–Bernoulli beam with a homogeneous, solid, circular cross-section. The rupture, however, occurs at a bimaterial cellular junction adjacent to a large solvent cavity, where the load-bearing structure is the cell wall; failure may occur by interfacial peel or shear rather than by outer-fiber bending tension. The species/location differences in Fig. 2E, including the new significant difference for wild stem trichomes, appear only after the R^{-3} normalization. A systematic ~10% difference in the measured radius R between groups changes σc by ~27%, and the two species are known to differ in glandular head morphology. The conclusion that the differences are 'governed by intrinsic structural properties' is therefore not robust unless the beam model is validated against the actual cell-wall geometry and failure mode—for example, through finite-element simulations or by measuring cell-wall thickness and using a thin-shell model. As written, the reported σc values are model-dependent nominal stresses, not measured material strengths.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Fig. 2C caption] The caption uses 'WT' while the text uses 'wild' for Solanum habrochaites; please use consistent terminology throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Fig. 2A and main text] The phrase 'onset of detectable rupture' is not precisely defined; please specify the frame-by-frame criterion used to identify rupture onset (e.g., first visible crack or first displacement discontinuity) so that the sub-millisecond release time is unambiguous.
  3. [Eq. (1)] The order-of-magnitude estimates for Re, We, and Bo are given as ranges, but the characteristic values U and L used in these estimates are not stated; please provide the actual values used.
  4. [Appendix B] The Washburn-based viscosity estimate assumes σ = 72 mN/m and θ = 0° (water-like values). This assumption is acknowledged, but it should be flagged more prominently as a dominant source of uncertainty; consider reporting the viscosity as a range obtained by varying σ and θ within plausible bounds.
  5. [Glandular Trichome Fluid Acts as a Mechanical Barrier to Insects] The filament is described as 'sugary' without compositional evidence; please rephrase as 'viscous' or 'terpene-rich' to avoid unsupported chemical claims.
  6. [Table 1] The text refers to a 'shaded region' in the table, but the shading is not visible in the preprint rendering; please ensure that the shaded region is clearly marked in the final typeset version.
  7. [References] Reference [31] has an extremely long author list; consider citing a more focused review on ductile-to-brittle transitions or indicating the specific section consulted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims rest on direct force, timing, and imaging measurements, while the beam-stress conversion is a post hoc modeling step and the only fitted parameter is explicitly preliminary.

full rationale

The central claims of the paper are direct experimental measurements: rupture forces of 1.4–23.8 µN (mean 7 ± 4 µN, N = 84), solvent release in under 1 ms after the onset of detectable rupture, and rupture localization at the glandular/intermediate-cell junction. The force signal F(t) = kΔx(t) (Eq. 2) combines the pipette deflection, measured directly from the pipette's center-of-mass position, with a spring constant k calibrated by the independent water-droplet and two-pipette procedures described in ref. 51. No parameter governing the rupture measurement is fitted to the rupture data it is used to explain. The Euler–Bernoulli stress conversion σc = Rτr/Iz (Eq. 5) is a standard post-processing formula applied to separately measured torque and radius values; it is a modeling assumption whose biological appropriateness could be debated, but it does not reduce to a fit, and it does not reintroduce as an output a quantity that was used as an input. The only fitted coefficient in the manuscript is C = 304 ± 13 m/s^(1/2) in the Washburn equation (Eq. 6), and the resulting viscosity estimate (µ ≈ 2.6 Pa·s, stated as a range of roughly 0.1–1 Pa·s) is explicitly labeled preliminary, with the authors enumerating its simplifications and calling for future rheological work. That estimate is not used to support the paper's main mechanistic conclusions. The collapse of the loading curves in Fig. 2C is obtained by normalizing each curve by its own peak force and time, and it is presented as a characterization of the measured behavior rather than as an independent prediction derived from a fitted model. No load-bearing step depends on a self-citation chain: the references to trichome development (ref. 14), micropipette calibration (ref. 51), and pest biology are external or methodological background, and the co-authored biochemical citations are not used to justify the mechanical results. Concerns about the applicability of homogeneous Euler–Bernoulli beam theory to a thin-walled cellular junction, or about systematic group-dependent bias in measuring R, are legitimate correctness risks, but they are not circularity: they question the physical model's validity, not whether the paper has disguised an input as an output. I therefore find no significant circularity and assign a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central rupture force and timing measurements are direct experimental observations that rest only on the sensor calibration and imaging, not on fitted model parameters. The secondary interpretations, such as the universal fracture mechanism and the critical stress comparison, rely on idealized mechanical modeling and on a normalization that collapses any linear loading curve. The viscosity estimate is preliminary and depends on an assumed water-like surface tension and a single Washburn fit.

free parameters (1)
  • Washburn coefficient C = 304 ± 13 m/s^1/2
    Best-fit coefficient in the Washburn equation used to estimate solvent viscosity in Appendix B; only affects the auxiliary viscosity estimate, not the central rupture force or timing measurements.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper Type VI trichome rupture follows a universal, brittle fracture mechanism, inferred from the collapse of force curves when normalized by rupture force and time to rupture.
    The collapse in Fig. 2C inset is interpreted as evidence of a single fracture mechanism, but any approximately linear loading curve collapses under the same normalization, so this premise is not independently established.
  • domain assumption The trichome junction can be modeled as an Euler-Bernoulli cantilever with a uniform circular cross-section of radius R, so the critical stress at rupture is σc = R τr / Iz.
    Used in the section on stress calculations (Eq. 5); the cellular junction is a thin, heterogeneous cell wall interface, and the model's validity is not verified.
  • domain assumption The glandular solvent has density and surface tension close to that of water, and a contact angle of zero, for order-of-magnitude fluid dynamics and the Washburn viscosity estimate.
    Assumed in the nondimensional analysis (Eq. 1) and in Appendix B; the viscosity estimate of 2.6 Pa·s is directly proportional to these assumed values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Glandular Trichome Rupture in Tomato Plants is an Ultra-Fast & Sensitive Defense Mechanism Against Insects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7IOLWMSB

@misc{pith2026241214507,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Glandular Trichome Rupture in Tomato Plants is an Ultra-Fast & Sensitive Defense Mechanism Against Insects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7IOLWMSB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14507}
}
read the original abstract

Trichomes, specialized hair-like structures on the surfaces of many plants, play a crucial role in defense against herbivorous insects. We investigated the biomechanics of type VI glandular trichomes in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and its wild relative (Solanum habrochaites). Using micropipette force sensors and high-speed imaging, we uncovered the rupture mechanics underlying gland bursting, highlighting the small forces and short time-scales involved in this process. Additionally, we observed larvae of the Western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis), a major pest in tomato cultivation, inadvertently triggering trichome rupture and accumulating glandular secretions on their bodies. These findings demonstrate how rapid gland bursting and the fluid dynamics of glandular secretions act as an efficient and swift plant defense mechanism against insect herbivory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14507 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The multiscale nature of trichomes. A. The stem and leaves of a S. habrochaites tomato plant, where the largest non-glandular trichomes are clearly visible as hair-like protrusions at distance from the plant surface. B. A zoom-in on the stem of the same species, displaying a dense forest of different trichome types. The non-glandular trichomes are generally taller and extend out of the image frame, while the glandul… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mechanics of glandular trichome rupture. A. Wild tomato trichome rupture occurs very rapidly upon the application of small amounts of force by a micropipette force sensor, with labeled times beginning from the last frame before rupture. Dashed line denotes the mechanically weak junction between the glandular and intermediate cells where rupture originates. These frames are from a high-speed video filmed at 28,000 fp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Thrips nymphs rupture wild tomato trichomes. A. Frames from a microscopy video before, during, and after a thrips leg causes glandular trichome head rupture. Zoomed-in panels are shown below each frame, with illustrative labels for the leg, gland head, and solvent filament formed afterward. The colors assigned to the frames indicate the time of the experiment in the leg position vs. time plot of B. The plot also tra… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A. Box plots of the torque to rupture tomato type VI glandular trichomes, for the two species and trichome locations on the plant studied in this work. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.001), while groups sharing the…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A. Capillary flow and penetration of glandular flow inside the glass micropipette over time. A magnified view is shown in the second panel. B. Variation of penetration length over time, where C = 304 ± 13 m/s1/2 is the best-fit value of the coefficient in equation 6. I…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Insect mouthparts: Ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies

    C. C. Labandeira, “Insect mouthparts: Ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28, 153–193 (1997)

  2. [2]

    Insect–Plant Interactions: A Multilayered Relationship

    G. Sharma, P. A. Malthankar, and V. Mathur, “Insect–Plant Interactions: A Multilayered Relationship”, Annals of the Entomological Society of America 114, 1–16 (2021)

  3. [3]

    Fossil Behavior Compendium

    A. J. Boucot and G. O. Poinar Jr., “Fossil Behavior Compendium”, Fossil Behavior Compendium, 10.1201/9781439810590 (2010)

  4. [4]

    Insect Diversity in the Fossil Record

    C. C. Labandeira and J. J. Sepkoski, “Insect Diversity in the Fossil Record”, Science 261, 310–315 (1993)

  5. [5]

    A defensive behavior and plant-insect interaction in Early Cretaceous amber – The case of the immature lacewing Hallucinochrysa diogenesi

    R. P´ erez-de la Fuente, X. Delcl` os, E. Pe˜ nalver, and M. S. Engel, “A defensive behavior and plant-insect interaction in Early Cretaceous amber – The case of the immature lacewing Hallucinochrysa diogenesi”, Arthropod Structure & Development 45, 133–139 (2016)

  6. [6]

    Analysis and review of trichomes in plants

    X. Wang, C. Shen, P. Meng, G. Tan, and L. Lv, “Analysis and review of trichomes in plants”, BMC Plant Biology 2021 21:1 21, 1–11 (2021)

  7. [7]

    New Approaches for Studying and Exploiting an Old Protuberance, the Plant Trichome

    G. J. Wagner, E. Wang, and R. W. Shepherd, “New Approaches for Studying and Exploiting an Old Protuberance, the Plant Trichome”, Annals of Botany 93, 3–11 (2004)

  8. [8]

    Glandular trichomes: what comes after expressed sequence tags?

    A. Tissier, “Glandular trichomes: what comes after expressed sequence tags?”, The Plant Journal 70, 51–68 (2012)

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Spatiotemporal cytoskeleton organizations determine morphogenesis of multicellular trichomes in tomato

    J. Chang, Z. Xu, M. Li, M. Yang, H. Qin, J. Yang, and S. Wu, “Spatiotemporal cytoskeleton organizations determine morphogenesis of multicellular trichomes in tomato”, PLOS Genetics 15, e1008438 (2019)

  2. [10]

    The Role of Trichomes in Plant Defense

    D. A. Levin, “The Role of Trichomes in Plant Defense”, The quarterly review of biology 48, 3–15 (1973). 7

  3. [11]

    Luckwill, The genus Lycopersicon

    L. Luckwill, The genus Lycopersicon. An historical, biological, and taxonomic survey of the wild and cultivated tomatoes. (1943)

  4. [12]

    Tomato, Pests, Parasitoids, and Predators: Tritrophic Interactions Involving the Genus Lycopersicon

    G. G. Kennedy, “Tomato, Pests, Parasitoids, and Predators: Tritrophic Interactions Involving the Genus Lycopersicon”, Annual Review of Entomology 48, 51–72 (2003)

  5. [13]

    Improved herbivore resistance in cultivated tomato with the sesquiterpene biosynthetic pathway from a wild relative

    P. M. Bleeker, R. Mirabella, P. J. Diergaarde, A. VanDoorn, A. Tissier, M. R. Kant, M. Prins, M. De Vos, M. A. Haring, and R. C. Schuurink, “Improved herbivore resistance in cultivated tomato with the sesquiterpene biosynthetic pathway from a wild relative”, Proceedings of the...

  6. [14]

    The development of type VI glandular trichomes in the cultivated tomato Solanum lycopersicum and a related wild species S. habrochaites

    N. Bergau, S. Bennewitz, F. Syrowatka, G. Hause, and A. Tissier, “The development of type VI glandular trichomes in the cultivated tomato Solanum lycopersicum and a related wild species S. habrochaites”, BMC Plant Biology 15, 1–15 (2015)

  7. [15]

    Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Trichome Development

    G. Han, Y. Li, Z. Yang, C. Wang, Y. Zhang, and B. Wang, “Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Trichome Development”, Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 910228 (2022)

  8. [16]

    Plant Glandular Trichomes as Targets for Breeding or Engineering of Resistance to Herbivores

    J. J. Glas, B. C. Schimmel, J. M. Alba, R. Escobar-Bravo, R. C. Schuurink, and M. R. Kant, “Plant Glandular Trichomes as Targets for Breeding or Engineering of Resistance to Herbivores”, International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2012, Vol. 13, Pages 17077-17103 13, 17077–171...

  9. [17]

    Plant trichomes and the biomechanics of defense in various systems, with Solanaceae as a model

    M. Bar and I. Shtein, “Plant trichomes and the biomechanics of defense in various systems, with Solanaceae as a model”, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2019-0144 97, 651–660 (2019)

  10. [18]

    The Arabidopsis trichome is an active mechanosensory switch

    L. H. Zhou, S. B. Liu, P. F. Wang, T. J. Lu, F. Xu, G. M. Genin, and B. G. Pickard, “The Arabidopsis trichome is an active mechanosensory switch”, Plant, Cell & Environment 40, 611–621 (2017)

  11. [19]

    Mechanosensory trichome cells evoke a mechanical stimuli–induced immune response in Arabidopsis thaliana

    M. Matsumura, M. Nomoto, T. Itaya, Y. Aratani, M. Iwamoto, T. Matsuura, Y. Hayashi, T. Mori, M. J. Skelly, Y. Y. Yamamoto, T. Kinoshita, I. C. Mori, T. Suzuki, S. Betsuyaku, S. H. Spoel, M. Toyota, and Y. Tada, “Mechanosensory trichome cells evoke a mechanical stimuli–induced ...

  12. [20]

    Different multicellular trichome types coordinate herbivore mechanosensing and defense in tomato

    C. Sun, J. Wei, X. Gu, M. Wu, M. Li, Y. Liu, N. An, K. Wu, S. Wu, J. Wu, M. Xu, J.-C. Wu, Y.-L. Wang, D.-Y. Chao, Y. Zhang, and S. Wu, “Different multicellular trichome types coordinate herbivore mechanosensing and defense in tomato”, The Plant Cell, 10.1093/PLCELL/KOAE269 (2024)

  13. [21]

    Forces to pierce cuticle of tarsi and material properties determined by nanoindentation: The Achilles’ heel of bed bugs

    J. Bustamante, J. F. Panzarino, T. J. Rupert, and C. Loudon, “Forces to pierce cuticle of tarsi and material properties determined by nanoindentation: The Achilles’ heel of bed bugs”, Biology Open 6, 1541 (2017)

  14. [22]

    Leaf Trichomes and Resistance of Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. esculentum to Spider Mites

    J. C. Snyder and C. D. Carter, “Leaf Trichomes and Resistance of Lycopersicon hirsutum and L. esculentum to Spider Mites”, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 109, 837–843 (1984)

  15. [23]

    A note on the resistance of Solanum polyadenium to aphids

    A Stringer, “A note on the resistance of Solanum polyadenium to aphids”, Annual Report Long Ashton Agricultural Horti- cultural Research Station, 88–89 (1946)

  16. [24]

    Glandular hairs providing resistance to aphids in certain wild potato species

    R. W. Gibson, “Glandular hairs providing resistance to aphids in certain wild potato species”, Annals of Applied Biology 68, 113–119 (1971)

  17. [25]

    Trichomes on leaves of Lycopersicon hirsutum, L. esculentum and their hybrids

    J. C. Snyder and C. D. Carter, “Trichomes on leaves of Lycopersicon hirsutum, L. esculentum and their hybrids”, Euphytica 34, 53–64 (1985)

  18. [26]

    Plant Volatiles: Going ‘In’ but not ‘Out’ of Trichome Cavities

    A. Tissier, J. A. Morgan, and N. Dudareva, “Plant Volatiles: Going ‘In’ but not ‘Out’ of Trichome Cavities”, Trends in Plant Science 22, 930–938 (2017)

  19. [27]

    Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Challenges in Inkjet Printing

    D. Lohse, “Fundamental Fluid Dynamics Challenges in Inkjet Printing”, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 54, 349–382 (2021)

  20. [28]

    Fluid Ejections in Nature

    E. J. Challita, P. Rohilla, and M. S. Bhamla, “Fluid Ejections in Nature”, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 10.1146/ANNUREV-CHEMBIOENG-100722-113148/1 (2024)

  21. [29]

    Brittle fracture: Its study and application

    J. E. Field, “Brittle fracture: Its study and application”, Contemporary Physics 12, 1–31 (1971)

  22. [30]

    Barsom and S

    J. Barsom and S. Rolfe, Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures: Applications of Fracture Mechanics (ASTM International, Jan. 1999)

  23. [31]

    Ductile-to-brittle transition and yielding in soft amorphous materials: perspectives and open questions

    T. Divoux, E. Agoritsas, S. Aime, C. Barentin, J. L. Barrat, R. Benzi, L. Berthier, D. Bi, G. Biroli, D. Bonn, P. Bourrianne, M. Bouzid, E. Del Gado, H. Delano¨ e-Ayari, K. Farain, S. Fielding, M. Fuchs, J. van der Gucht, S. Henkes, M. Jalaal, Y. M. Joshi, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, R. L....

  24. [32]

    Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory

    A. ¨Ochsner, “Euler–Bernoulli Beam Theory”, in Classical beam theories of structural mechanics , Vol. 1 (Springer, Cham, 2021), pp. 7–66

  25. [33]

    SlMYC1 Regulates Type VI Glandular Trichome Formation and Terpene Biosynthesis in Tomato Glandular Cells

    J. Xu, Z. O. Van Herwijnen, D. B. Dr¨ ager, C. Sui, M. A. Haring, and R. C. Schuurink, “SlMYC1 Regulates Type VI Glandular Trichome Formation and Terpene Biosynthesis in Tomato Glandular Cells”, The Plant Cell 30, 2988–3005 (2019)

  26. [34]

    Induction of plant volatiles by herbivores with different feeding habits and the effects of induced defenses on host-plant selection by thrips

    C. M. Delphia, M. C. Mescher, and C. M. De Moraes, “Induction of plant volatiles by herbivores with different feeding habits and the effects of induced defenses on host-plant selection by thrips”, Journal of chemical ecology 33, 997–1012 (2007)

  27. [35]

    Thrips advisor: exploiting thrips-induced defences to combat pests on crops

    M. Steenbergen, A. Abd-El-Haliem, P. Bleeker, M. Dicke, R. Escobar-Bravo, G. Cheng, M. A. Haring, M. R. Kant, I. Kappers, P. G. Klinkhamer, K. A. Leiss, S. Legarrea, M. Macel, S. Mouden, C. M. Pieterse, S. J. Sarde, R. C. Schuurink, M. De Vos, S. C. Van Wees, and C. Broekgaard...

  28. [36]

    Genetic and physiological requirements for high-level sesquiterpene-production in tomato glandular trichomes

    R. W. Kortbeek, M. D. Galland, A. Muras, R. Therezan, S. Maia, M. A. Haring, R. C. Schuurink, and P. M. Bleeker, “Genetic and physiological requirements for high-level sesquiterpene-production in tomato glandular trichomes”, Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1139274 (2023)

  29. [37]

    Structure-Function Relationships Affecting the Insecticidal and Miticidal Activity of Sugar Esters

    G. J. Puterka, W. Farone, T. Palmer, and A. Barrington, “Structure-Function Relationships Affecting the Insecticidal and Miticidal Activity of Sugar Esters”, Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 636–644 (2003). 8

  30. [38]

    Entrapment of Helicoverpa armigera (H¨ ubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon species

    A. T. Simmons, G. M. Gurr, D. McGrath, P. M. Martin, and H. I. Nicol, “Entrapment of Helicoverpa armigera (H¨ ubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon species”, Australian Journal of Entomology 43, 196–200 (2004)

  31. [39]

    A viscoelastic deadly fluid in carnivorous pitcher plants

    L. Gaume and Y. Forterre, “A viscoelastic deadly fluid in carnivorous pitcher plants”, PLoS ONE 2, 1–7 (2007)

  32. [40]

    T. L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications, Fourth Edition (CRC Press, Jan. 2017)

  33. [41]

    Endogenous plant metabolites against insects

    R. W. J. Kortbeek, M. Van Der Gragt, and P. M. Bleeker, “Endogenous plant metabolites against insects”, European Journal of Plant Pathology 2018 154:1 154, 67–90 (2018)

  34. [42]

    Biology of the Tobacco Hornworm in the Southern Cigar-Tobacco District

    A. H. Madden and F. S. Chamberlin, “Biology of the Tobacco Hornworm in the Southern Cigar-Tobacco District”, Technical Bulletin, United States Department of Agriculture 896, 10.22004/AG.ECON.169886 (1945)

  35. [43]

    J. L. Capinera, Handbook of Vegetable Pests (Academic Press, 2001)

  36. [44]

    Life cycle of South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) in Nepal

    A. Bajracharya and B. Bhat, “Life cycle of South American tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) in Nepal”, Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 6, 287–290 (2018)

  37. [45]

    Static Forces and Moments Generated in the Insect Leg: Comparison of a Three-Dimensional Musculo-Skeletal Computer Model With Experimental Measurements

    R. J. Full and A. N. Ahn, “Static Forces and Moments Generated in the Insect Leg: Comparison of a Three-Dimensional Musculo-Skeletal Computer Model With Experimental Measurements”, Journal of Experimental Biology 198, 1285–1298 (1995)

  38. [46]

    Insect Walking and Robotics

    F. Delcomyn, “Insect Walking and Robotics”, Annual Review of Entomology 49, 51–70 (2004)

  39. [47]

    The dynamics of legged locomotion: Models, analyses, and challenges

    P. Holmes, R. J. Full, D. Koditschek, and J. Guckenheimer, “The dynamics of legged locomotion: Models, analyses, and challenges”, SIAM Review 48, 207–304 (2006)

  40. [48]

    Slow, fast and furious: understanding the physics of plant movements

    Y. Forterre, “Slow, fast and furious: understanding the physics of plant movements”, Journal of experimental botany 64, 4745–4760 (2013)

  41. [49]

    Ultra-fast underwater suction traps

    O. Vincent, C. Weißkopf, S. Poppinga, T. Masselter, T. Speck, M. Joyeux, C. Quilliet, and P. Marmottant, “Ultra-fast underwater suction traps”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, 2909–2914 (2011)

  42. [50]

    Uncovering the mechanical secrets of the squirting cucumber

    F. Box, D. E. Moulton, D. Vella, Y. Bhagotra, T. Lowe, A. Goriely, and C. J. Thorogood, “Uncovering the mechanical secrets of the squirting cucumber”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e2410420121 (2024)

  43. [51]

    Micropipette force sensors for in vivo force measurements on single cells and multicellular microorganisms

    M. Backholm and O. B¨ aumchen, “Micropipette force sensors for in vivo force measurements on single cells and multicellular microorganisms”, Nature Protocols 2019 14:2 14, 594–615 (2019)

  44. [52]

    https://github.com/FluidLab/Micropipette-force-calibration

  45. [53]

    The Dynamics of Capillary Flow

    E. W. Washburn, “The Dynamics of Capillary Flow”, Physical Review 17, 273 (1921)

  46. [54]

    de Gennes, F

    P.-G. de Gennes, F. Brochard-Wyart, and D. Qu´ er´ e, Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves (Springer New York, 2004). 9 MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant materials and growth conditions Tomato plants from the wild accession PI127826 ( S. habrochaites) and...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.