REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 100 references
Quantum thermometry for ultralow temperatures using probe and ancilla qubit chains
T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A chain of N qubits gives a probe with up to N distinct temperature-sensing peaks, one per transition energy.
desk verdict A competent multi-peak QFI thermometer using XX+DM chains, with a fixable analytical error and an unproven advantage over independent qubits. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the $N\times N$ tridiagonal matrix $M$ defined by $M_{i,i}=\omega_i$, $M_{i,i+1}=2(J_i+i g_i)$, $M_{i+1,i}=2(J_i-i g_i)$. After a Jordan-Wigner transformation the chain Hamiltonian is $C^\dagger M C$, so the thermal partition function factorizes as $Z=\prod_l(1+e^{-\beta E_l})$ with $E_l$ the eigenvalues of $M$; these eigenvalues are the transition frequencies the bath can excite, and each one is a separate temperature channel visible as a peak in the probe's quantum Fisher information. In the two-qubit case the same structure reduces to the effective frequencies $\omega_\pm=\omega_S\pm\eta$, whose separation decides whether one or two peaks appear. The absence of coherences in the probe state is a second piece of machinery: it reduces the quantum estimation problem to a single population $p(T)$ and makes the QFI equal to the classical Fisher information of a $\sigma_z$ measurement.
What would settle it
Measure the probe excited-state population as a function of temperature in a two-qubit chain with strongly off-resonant qubits, for example $\omega_p=1$, $\omega_a=0.04$, $g=0.02$, $J=0.04$; the paper predicts two QFI peaks near $T\approx\omega_-/2.4$ and $T\approx\omega_+/4.4$, so observing only one peak, or peaks that do not track the eigenvalues of $M$ in Eq. (27), would refute the central claim.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
In the paper's own terms, the discovery is that an XX-plus-DM-coupled chain of N qubits offers exactly N distinct energy-transition channels, and the reduced state of the probe qubit encodes them all: the quantum Fisher information $F_Q(T)$ exhibits up to N peaks, each located near a temperature set by one eigenvalue $E_l$ of the tridiagonal matrix $M$ in Eq. (27), with the approximate rule $T_{\rm peak}\approx E_l/2.4$ for well-separated eigenvalues. The partition function $Z=\prod_l(1+e^{-\beta E_l})$ contains the whole spectrum, and because the probe state has no coherences, $F_Q$ is determined by a single population and coincides with the classical Fisher information, so a $\sigma_z$ measurement saturates the quantum Cramér-Rao bound. For two qubits the two channels are the effective frequencies $\omega_\pm=\omega_S\pm\eta$; when the qubits are off-resonant ($\omega_p\gg\omega_a$) these differ by orders of magnitude and the QFI has two peaks, while for resonant qubits the channels nearly merge and only one peak remains. For chains with three, four, and five qubits, choosing the ancilla frequencies and couplings in a hierarchy $\omega_1<\cdots<\omega_p$ and $g_1<\cdots<g_{N-1}$ produces exactly 3, 4, and 5 QFI peaks, with each new peak appearing at lower temperature, and the height of each peak is tuned by the corresponding $g_i$ and $J_i$.
Load-bearing premise
The whole qubit chain, including the probe, reaches the global Gibbs steady state at the sample temperature under weak system-bath coupling; if the probe does not fully thermalize through the ancilla chain, the predicted QFI peaks and their temperature locations will not hold.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- For an $N$-qubit chain the number of resolvable ultralow-temperature windows grows linearly with $N$: each new ancilla qubit adds one QFI peak, at a lower temperature, provided the transition energies stay separated by orders of magnitude.
- Peak locations are predictable from the spectrum: solving $T_i\approx E_i/(2\tanh(E_i/2T_i))$ gives the peak temperatures, so the chain can be designed by choosing qubit frequencies and couplings to place sensitivity windows where they are needed.
- No quantum measurement is required: the probe state is diagonal, the classical Fisher information equals the QFI, a $\sigma_z$ population measurement saturates the Cramér-Rao bound, and $\sigma_x$ measurements yield zero temperature information.
- Precision at a given temperature window is controlled mainly by the coupling strength associated with that transition, so a single chain can be tuned for high precision in the low-temperature window (small $g$) or in the high-temperature window (larger $g$), with a trade-off between peak heights.
- If couplings grow too strong, transition energies converge and distinct peaks merge, so maintaining the frequency hierarchy $\omega_1<\cdots<\omega_p$ and the coupling hierarchy $g_1<\cdots<g_{N-1}$ is the practical condition for the full $N$-peak response.
Reading between the lines
- Editorial inference: the eigenvalue picture suggests that any XX-plus-DM chain whose matrix $M$ has well-separated eigenvalues should show the same multi-peak response, so the specific hierarchy of frequencies and couplings is sufficient rather than necessary.
- Editorial inference: an unanalyzed extension is multi-parameter estimation: with $N$ distinct peaks the probe could in principle estimate several temperatures at once, but the paper treats a single unknown $T$ and no multi-parameter Cramér-Rao bound is computed.
- Editorial inference: the bound of $N$ distinct transitions follows from the nearest-neighbor single-particle form of $M$; adding longer-range couplings or multiple excitations would break the tridiagonal structure and could produce additional channels, a possibility the paper leaves open.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper proposes a multi-qubit quantum thermometer in which a probe qubit, kept outside the thermal sample, is coupled by Heisenberg XX and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions to a chain of N-1 ancilla qubits that are immersed in the sample. Assuming the whole chain reaches the global Gibbs state at the unknown temperature T, the authors compute the probe qubit's quantum Fisher information (QFI), show that it exhibits multiple peaks as a function of T, and interpret each peak as associated with an eigenvalue E_l of a tridiagonal matrix M obtained by a Jordan-Wigner transformation. For two qubits they give exact and approximate expressions for the population and QFI, and for N=3,4,5 they present numerics showing up to N QFI peaks, with peak locations approximately T_l ≈ E_l/2.4. The paper also shows the absence of coherences in the probe state and that the classical Fisher information for a σz measurement saturates the QFI.
Significance. If the global-thermalization assumption is justified, the scheme is an attractive, autonomous, multi-scale low-temperature thermometer: it requires only local population measurements on one qubit, needs no initial coherence or entanglement, and gives a tunable number of sensitivity peaks. The exact two-qubit QFI expression, the mapping to a free-fermion chain, and the numerics for N=3,4,5 are clearly laid out and internally consistent with the single-particle spectrum. The main advertised result, that a chain of N qubits yields up to N QFI peaks with locations controlled by the eigenvalues of M, is plausible and falsifiable. However, the paper currently leaves the thermalization step as an assumption and contains a few concrete technical errors in the supporting equations, so the central claim is not yet fully backed.
major comments (4)
- [Sec. II / Appendix A] The global Gibbs steady state is assumed rather than derived. The bath is coupled only to the ancilla via Eq. (6), yet the text states in Appendix A that weak coupling 'allow[s] the entire two-qubit state to reach a Gibbs thermal steady state' and cites textbooks without showing that the Davies generator for this specific coupling is ergodic on all energy levels. For the N-qubit chain, the analogous requirement is that every single-particle mode has a nonzero coupling to the bath (U_{1l} ≠ 0 for all l); otherwise the probe may not thermalize to the sample temperature and the QFI peaks computed from Eq. (20) would not describe the actual sensor. Please add a master-equation derivation for the two-qubit case, or a numerical Lindblad calculation comparing the exact steady state with Eq. (20), and state the conditions under which the global Gibbs state is reached for the chain.
- [Eqs. (15) and (33)] The transcendental equation for the peak temperature is printed with the inverse tangent. For a term proportional to sech²(E/2T)/T², the maximum satisfies x tanh x = 1 with x = E/(2T), which is equivalent to T = (E/2) tanh(E/(2T)) and gives T ≈ E/2.4. The printed equations T = E/(2 tanh(E/(2T))) are instead equivalent to x = tanh x, which has no positive solution. Since Eq. (33) is used to mark the peak positions in Figs. 7 and 9, the equation should be corrected and the numerical method used to obtain the reported vertical lines should be described.
- [Eq. (22)] The approximate low-temperature QFI does not follow from Eq. (13). For p_-(T) = cos²θ/(1 + e^{ω_-/T}), direct evaluation of (p')²/[p(1-p)] gives cos²θ ω_-² e^{ω_-/T} / [T⁴ (1 + e^{ω_-/T})² (sin²θ + e^{ω_-/T})]. The printed expression contains e^{2ω_-/T} in the numerator, which changes the low-temperature scaling by an extra factor e^{ω_-/T} and is inconsistent with the claimed agreement between exact and approximate curves in Fig. 6. Please correct the formula and regenerate the corresponding comparison.
- [Sec. IV.A / Appendix C] The claim that the QFI has at most N peaks, located at the eigenvalues E_l of M, is not proved. The factorized partition function in Eq. (C12) shows that the probe population is a weighted sum of Fermi functions, but the number of local maxima of the resulting QFI is a separate statement. The paper provides numerical examples for N = 3, 4, 5 in carefully chosen parameter regimes, but does not prove that no additional peaks arising from combinations of the E_l can appear for other parameters. Please either provide a proof of the bound or explicitly formulate the N-peak behavior as a demonstrated property of the studied parameter families rather than a proven maximum.
minor comments (5)
- [Eq. (C2)] The second off-diagonal term is missing the factor 2: the line should read 2[(J_i + i g_i)σ⁺_i σ⁻_{i+1} + (J_i - i g_i)σ⁺_{i+1} σ⁻_i] to be consistent with Eq. (27).
- [Conclusion] The conclusion states that with N-1 ancilla qubits 'we can now have N+1 energy channels', which conflicts with Sec. IV.A where the chain has N transition frequencies (e.g., N = 2 has two channels, not three). Please correct this inconsistency.
- [Eq. (20)] The phrase 'for the sake of bravity' should be 'for the sake of brevity'.
- [Sec. III.A] The notations p′₋(T) and p′₊(T) are used in Fig. 4 before being defined; please define them at first use and state the relation to p′ from Eq. (11).
- [Appendix B] The statement that the CFI is 'exactly equal' to the QFI should specify that this equality holds for the projective measurement in the σz basis / population measurement, not for an arbitrary POVM, since a σx measurement gives zero Fisher information as noted later.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the QFI peak/eigenvalue correspondence is computed from the assumed thermal state and checked numerically, not fitted or defined into existence.
full rationale
The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The probe QFI (Eq. 20) is obtained by direct calculation from the two-qubit thermal density matrix (Eq. 10, Appendix A), and the multi-qubit probe state is computed from the global Gibbs state via the Jordan-Wigner mapping (Appendix C). The peak positions are then compared with the eigenvalues of the tridiagonal matrix M (Eq. 27) through Eq. (33); for N=3,4,5 the vertical lines from Eq. (33) are verified against the numerically computed QFI. This is a consistency check between two quantities both derived from the same Hamiltonian, not a fit of parameters to the QFI data. The statement that at most N transition frequencies exist is a direct consequence of the N×N single-particle matrix M and the product partition function Z = Π(1+e^{-βE_l}); it is an input-constrained model result rather than a circular redefinition of the output. No uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation is invoked; the only self-citations (Refs. [49,55]) are contextual or identify a standard thermal-qubit QFI comparison. The genuine weakness of the paper is physical, not circular: the entire chain is assumed to reach the global Gibbs state at the sample temperature although the bath couples only to the ancilla (Eq. 6, Appendix A). This assumption is stated explicitly rather than derived, and it is a correctness risk; however, because the predictions are not used to justify the assumption, it does not make the derivation circular.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (3)
- Ancilla frequency hierarchy omega_1...omega_{N-1} =
omega_1=0.0004, omega_2=0.004, omega_3=0.04, omega_4=0.4 (scaled by omega_p=1) for N=5
- Coupling strengths J_i, g_i =
e.g., g1=0.0005, g2=0.005, g3=0.06, g4=0.2; J_i of similar hierarchy
- Empirical peak-position factor =
T approximately E_i/2.4 (and T+- approximately omega_+-/4, omega_+-/4.4 for two qubits)
assumptions (3)
- domain assumption The whole N-qubit chain reaches the Gibbs thermal state at the sample temperature under weak system-bath coupling.
- standard math The spin chain maps exactly to a non-interacting fermionic chain via the Jordan-Wigner transformation, so the thermal state factorizes into single-particle modes.
- domain assumption The bath is Markovian and thermal, so the steady state of the Davies generator is the Gibbs state of the full system Hamiltonian.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Quantum thermometry for ultralow temperatures using probe and ancilla qubit chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XAEDB676
@misc{pith2026241214898,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Quantum thermometry for ultralow temperatures using probe and ancilla qubit chains},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XAEDB676}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14898}
}
abstract
We propose a scheme to enhance the range and precision of ultralow temperature measurements by employing a probe qubit coupled to a chain of ancilla qubits. Specifically, we analyze a qubit chain governed by Heisenberg $XX$ and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interactions. The precision limits of temperature measurements are characterized through the evaluation of quantum Fisher information (QFI). Our findings demonstrate that the achievable precision bounds, as well as the number of peaks in the QFI as a function of temperature, can be controlled by adjusting the number of ancilla qubits and the system's model parameters. These results are interpreted in terms of the influence of energy transitions on the range and the number of QFI peaks as a function of temperature. This study highlights the potential of the probe qubit-ancilla chain system as a powerful and precise tool for quantum thermometry in the ultralow temperature regime.
Figures
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[55]
En- tanglement enhanced thermometry in the detection of the unruh effect,
Zehua Tian, Jieci Wang, Jiliang Jing, and Andrzej Dragan, “En- tanglement enhanced thermometry in the detection of the unruh effect,” Ann. Phys. 377, 1–9 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[1]
As the system does not generate coherences in the probe state, the populations within the density matrix serve as effective indicators for measuring T
Low-temperature peak The steady-state solution of the system is sensitive to changes in the unknown value of T and this sensitivity can be used to determine the value of T. As the system does not generate coherences in the probe state, the populations within the density matrix serve as effective indicators for measuring T. Therefore, we will carry out a d...
-
[2]
Under such assumptions, the ex- pression of p in Eq
High-temperature peak To resolve the peak at high temperature, we apply certain assumptions, specifically setting cos 2θ ≈ −1 for the param- 5 eters under consideration. Under such assumptions, the ex- pression of p in Eq. (11) reduces to p+(T) ≈ 1 1 + e ω+ T , (16) where ω+ = ωS + η. The first derivative of p is given as p′ +(T) = ω+sech2( ω+ 2T ) 4T2 . ...
-
[3]
(14) and (17), respectively
Role of transition energies The appearance of two peaks in the QFI can be explained by the presence of two energy channels, ω− and ω+ appear- ing in Eqs. (14) and (17), respectively. When the two qubits are resonant, such that ωa = ωp = 1, and with coupling strengths of g = 0.03 and J = 0.05, we find that ω− = 0.88 and ω+ = 1.11. This shows that the two f...
-
[4]
Therefore, the QFI can be computed based on the probe population in Eq
Approximate QFI To derive the analytical expressions for the QFI correspond- ing to each peak, we can use the approximate values of the probe’s population. Therefore, the QFI can be computed based on the probe population in Eq. (13), and using the for- mula in Eq. (19), it is given by F low Q ≈ ω2 − cos2(θ)e2ω−/T T4 1 + eω−/T 2 sin2(θ) +eω−/T . (22) In a ...
-
[5]
The role of quantum information in ther- modynamics—a topical review,
John Goold, Marcus Huber, Arnau Riera, L ´ıdia del Rio, and Paul Skrzypczyk, “The role of quantum information in ther- modynamics—a topical review,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 49, 143001 (2016)
2016
-
[6]
Quantum ther- mometry,
Antonella De Pasquale and Thomas M. Stace, “Quantum ther- mometry,” in Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fun- damental Aspects and New Directions (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)
2018
-
[7]
Quantum estimation for quantum technol- ogy,
Matteo G. A. Paris, “Quantum estimation for quantum technol- ogy,” Int. J. Quantum. Inf. 07, 125–137 (2009)
2009
Show all 100 references
-
[8]
Single-atom quantum probes for ultracold gases boosted by nonequilibrium spin dynamics,
Quentin Bouton, Jens Nettersheim, Daniel Adam, Felix Schmidt, Daniel Mayer, Tobias Lausch, Eberhard Tiemann, and Artur Widera, “Single-atom quantum probes for ultracold gases boosted by nonequilibrium spin dynamics,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 011018 (2020)
2020
-
[9]
Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell,
G. Kucsko, P. C. Maurer, N. Y . Yao, M. Kubo, H. J. Noh, P. K. Lo, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, “Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell,” Nature 500, 54–58 (2013)
2013
-
[10]
Thermometry of strongly correlated fermionic quantum sys- tems using impurity probes,
George Mihailescu, Steve Campbell, and Andrew K. Mitchell, “Thermometry of strongly correlated fermionic quantum sys- tems using impurity probes,” Phys. Rev. A107, 042614 (2023)
2023
-
[11]
Multiparameter critical quantum metrol- ogy with impurity probes,
George Mihailescu, Abolfazl Bayat, Steve Campbell, and An- drew K Mitchell, “Multiparameter critical quantum metrol- ogy with impurity probes,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 9, 035033 (2024)
2024
-
[12]
Quantum sensing of ultralow temperature in biwire ultracold polar molecules,
Abdel ˆaali Boudjemˆaa, Karima Abbas, Asma Tahar Taiba, and Qing-Shou Tan, “Quantum sensing of ultralow temperature in biwire ultracold polar molecules,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 032611 (2024)
2024
-
[13]
Subnanokelvin thermometry of an interacting d-dimensional homogeneous bose gas,
Muhammad Miskeen Khan, Mohammad Mehboudi, Hugo Terc ¸as, Maciej Lewenstein, and Miguel Angel Garcia-March, “Subnanokelvin thermometry of an interacting d-dimensional homogeneous bose gas,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023191 (2022)
2022
-
[14]
Optomechanical raman- ratio thermometry,
T. P. Purdy, P.-L. Yu, N. S. Kampel, R. W. Peterson, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, and C. A. Regal, “Optomechanical raman- ratio thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A92, 031802 (2015)
2015
-
[15]
Using polarons for sub-nk quantum nondemoli- tion thermometry in a bose-einstein condensate,
Mohammad Mehboudi, Aniello Lampo, Christos Charalam- bous, Luis A. Correa, Miguel ´Angel Garc´ıa-March, and Maciej Lewenstein, “Using polarons for sub-nk quantum nondemoli- tion thermometry in a bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 030403 (2019)
2019
-
[16]
Bath-induced correlations enhance ther- mometry precision at low temperatures,
Guim Planella, Marina F. B. Cenni, Antonio Ac ´ın, and Mo- hammad Mehboudi, “Bath-induced correlations enhance ther- mometry precision at low temperatures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 040502 (2022)
2022
-
[17]
In situ thermom- etry of a cold fermi gas via dephasing impurities,
Mark T. Mitchison, Thom´as Fogarty, Giacomo Guarnieri, Steve Campbell, Thomas Busch, and John Goold, “In situ thermom- etry of a cold fermi gas via dephasing impurities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 080402 (2020)
2020
-
[18]
Thermometry by correlated dephasing of impurities in a one-dimensional fermi gas,
Sindre Brattegard and Mark T. Mitchison, “Thermometry by correlated dephasing of impurities in a one-dimensional fermi gas,” Phys. Rev. A109, 023309 (2024)
2024
-
[19]
Topological quantum thermome- try,
Anubhav Kumar Srivastava, Utso Bhattacharya, Maciej Lewen- stein, and Marcin Płodzie ´n, “Topological quantum thermome- try,” (2023), arXiv:2311.14524 [quant-ph]
2023 arXiv
-
[20]
Enhanced precision bound of low- temperature quantum thermometry via dynamical control,
Victor Mukherjee, Analia Zwick, Arnab Ghosh, Xi Chen, and Gershon Kurizki, “Enhanced precision bound of low- temperature quantum thermometry via dynamical control,” Commun. Phys. 2, 162 (2019)
2019
-
[21]
Optimal cold atom thermometry using adaptive bayesian strategies,
Jonas Glatthard, Jes ´us Rubio, Rahul Sawant, Thomas Hewitt, Giovanni Barontini, and Luis A. Correa, “Optimal cold atom thermometry using adaptive bayesian strategies,” PRX Quan- tum 3, 040330 (2022)
2022
-
[22]
Critical quantum thermometry and its feasibility in spin sys- tems,
Enes Aybar, Artur Niezgoda, Safoura S. Mirkhalaf, Morgan W. Mitchell, Daniel Benedicto Orenes, and Emilia Witkowska, “Critical quantum thermometry and its feasibility in spin sys- tems,” Quantum 6, 808 (2022)
2022
-
[23]
Few-fermion thermometry,
Marcin Płodzie ´n, Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, and Tomasz Sowi´nski, “Few-fermion thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 063619 (2018)
2018
-
[24]
Sequential measurements for quantum- enhanced magnetometry in spin chain probes,
Victor Montenegro, Gareth Si ˆon Jones, Sougato Bose, and Abolfazl Bayat, “Sequential measurements for quantum- enhanced magnetometry in spin chain probes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120503 (2022)
2022
-
[25]
Quantum estimation via sequential measure- ments,
Daniel Burgarth, Vittorio Giovannetti, Airi N Kato, and Kazuya Yuasa, “Quantum estimation via sequential measure- ments,” New J. Phys, 17, 113055 (2015)
2015
-
[26]
Se- quential measurement thermometry with quantum many-body probes,
Yaoling Yang, Victor Montenegro, and Abolfazl Bayat, “Se- quential measurement thermometry with quantum many-body probes,” Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 024069 (2024)
2024
-
[27]
Global quan- tum thermometry,
Jes ´us Rubio, Janet Anders, and Luis A. Correa, “Global quan- tum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 190402 (2021)
2021
-
[28]
Optimal probes for global quantum thermom- etry,
Wai-Keong Mok, Kishor Bharti, Leong-Chuan Kwek, and Abolfazl Bayat, “Optimal probes for global quantum thermom- etry,” Commun. Phys. 4, 62 (2021)
2021
-
[29]
Strict hi- erarchy of optimal strategies for global estimations: Linking global estimations with local ones,
Zhao-Yi Zhou, Jing-Tao Qiu, and Da-Jian Zhang, “Strict hi- erarchy of optimal strategies for global estimations: Linking global estimations with local ones,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L032048 (2024)
2024
-
[30]
Global quantum thermometry based on the optimal biased bound,
Shoukang Chang, Yunbin Yan, Lu Wang, Wei Ye, Xuan Rao, Huan Zhang, Liqing Huang, Mengmeng Luo, Yuetao Chen, Qiang Ma, and Shaoyan Gao, “Global quantum thermometry based on the optimal biased bound,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043171 (2024)
2024
-
[31]
Dynamical role of quantum sig- natures in quantum thermometry,
Michele M. Feyles, Luca Mancino, Marco Sbroscia, Ilaria Gi- anani, and Marco Barbieri, “Dynamical role of quantum sig- natures in quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062114 (2019)
2019
-
[32]
Multispin probes for ther- mometry in the strong-coupling regime,
Marlon Brenes and Dvira Segal, “Multispin probes for ther- mometry in the strong-coupling regime,” Phys. Rev. A 108, 17 032220 (2023)
2023
-
[33]
Non-markovian quantum thermometry,
Ning Zhang, Chong Chen, Si-Yuan Bai, Wei Wu, and Jun- Hong An, “Non-markovian quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034073 (2022)
2022
-
[34]
Bypassing thermalization timescales in temper- ature estimation using prethermal probes,
Nicholas Anto-Sztrikacs, Harry J. D. Miller, Ahsan Nazir, and Dvira Segal, “Bypassing thermalization timescales in temper- ature estimation using prethermal probes,” Phys. Rev. A 109, L060201 (2024)
2024
-
[35]
Non- markovian enhancement of nonequilibrium quantum thermom- etry,
Y . Aiache, C. Seida, K. El Anouz, and A. El Allati, “Non- markovian enhancement of nonequilibrium quantum thermom- etry,” Phys. Rev. E110, 024132 (2024)
2024
-
[36]
Collisional quan- tum thermometry,
Stella Seah, Stefan Nimmrichter, Daniel Grimmer, Jader P. San- tos, Valerio Scarani, and Gabriel T. Landi, “Collisional quan- tum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 180602 (2019)
2019
-
[37]
Surpassing the thermal cram ´er-rao bound with collisional thermometry,
Angeline Shu, Stella Seah, and Valerio Scarani, “Surpassing the thermal cram ´er-rao bound with collisional thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A 102, 042417 (2020)
2020
-
[38]
Bayesian estimation for collisional thermometry,
Gabriel O. Alves and Gabriel T. Landi, “Bayesian estimation for collisional thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A105, 012212 (2022)
2022
-
[39]
Pri- mary thermometry of propagating microwaves in the quantum regime,
Marco Scigliuzzo, Andreas Bengtsson, Jean-Claude Besse, An- dreas Wallraff, Per Delsing, and Simone Gasparinetti, “Pri- mary thermometry of propagating microwaves in the quantum regime,” Phys. Rev. X10, 041054 (2020)
2020
-
[40]
Non-markovian enhanced temper- ature sensing in a dipolar bose-einstein condensate,
Lan Xu, Ji-Bing Yuan, Shi-Qing Tang, Wei Wu, Qing-Shou Tan, and Le-Man Kuang, “Non-markovian enhanced temper- ature sensing in a dipolar bose-einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. A 108, 022608 (2023)
2023
-
[41]
Single-qubit thermometry,
Sania Jevtic, David Newman, Terry Rudolph, and T. M. Stace, “Single-qubit thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A91, 012331 (2015)
2015
-
[42]
Qubit thermometry for micromechanical resonators,
Matteo Brunelli, Stefano Olivares, and Matteo G. A. Paris, “Qubit thermometry for micromechanical resonators,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 032105 (2011)
2011
-
[43]
Quantum ther- mometry by single-qubit dephasing,
Sholeh Razavian, Claudia Benedetti, Matteo Bina, Yahya Akbari-Kourbolagh, and Matteo G. A. Paris, “Quantum ther- mometry by single-qubit dephasing,” The European Physical Journal Plus 134, 284 (2019)
2019
-
[44]
Qubit-assisted thermometry of a quantum harmonic oscillator,
Matteo Brunelli, Stefano Olivares, Mauro Paternostro, and Matteo G. A. Paris, “Qubit-assisted thermometry of a quantum harmonic oscillator,” Phys. Rev. A86, 012125 (2012)
2012
-
[45]
Fisher information rates in sequentially measured quantum systems,
Eoin O’Connor, Steve Campbell, and Gabriel T Landi, “Fisher information rates in sequentially measured quantum systems,” New J. Phys. 26, 033048 (2024)
2024
-
[46]
Single-atom ther- mometer for ultracold gases,
Michael Hohmann, Farina Kindermann, Tobias Lausch, Daniel Mayer, Felix Schmidt, and Artur Widera, “Single-atom ther- mometer for ultracold gases,” Phys. Rev. A93, 043607 (2016)
2016
-
[47]
Coherent and dephasing spec- troscopy for single-impurity probing of an ultracold bath,
Daniel Adam, Quentin Bouton, Jens Nettersheim, Sabrina Bur- gardt, and Artur Widera, “Coherent and dephasing spec- troscopy for single-impurity probing of an ultracold bath,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120404 (2022)
2022
-
[48]
Nanoscale thermal imaging of dissipation in quantum systems,
D. Halbertal, J. Cuppens, M. Ben Shalom, L. Embon, N. Shadmi, Y . Anahory, H. R. Naren, J. Sarkar, A. Uri, Y . Ro- nen, Y . Myasoedov, L. S. Levitov, E. Joselevich, A. K. Geim, and E. Zeldov, “Nanoscale thermal imaging of dissipation in quantum systems,” Nature 539, 407–410 (2016)
2016
-
[49]
Reaching the ultimate energy resolution of a quantum detector,
Bayan Karimi, Fredrik Brange, Peter Samuelsson, and Jukka P. Pekola, “Reaching the ultimate energy resolution of a quantum detector,” Nat. Commun. 11, 367 (2020)
2020
-
[50]
Thermometry precision in strongly correlated ultracold lattice gases,
M Mehboudi, M Moreno-Cardoner, G De Chiara, and A San- pera, “Thermometry precision in strongly correlated ultracold lattice gases,” New J. Phys. 17, 055020 (2015)
2015
-
[51]
Precision thermometry and the quantum speed limit,
Steve Campbell, Marco G Genoni, and Sebastian Deffner, “Precision thermometry and the quantum speed limit,” Quan- tum Sci. Technol. 3, 025002 (2018)
2018
-
[52]
Enhanc- ing gaussian quantum metrology with position-momentum cor- relations,
Jo ˜ao C. P. Porto, Lucas S. Marinho, Pedro R. Dieguez, Iris- mar Gonc ¸alves da Paz, and Carlos Henrique Vieira, “Enhanc- ing gaussian quantum metrology with position-momentum cor- relations,” Phys. Scr. (2024)
2024
-
[53]
Mixing thermal coherent states for precision and range en- hancement in quantum thermometry,
A. Ullah, M. Tahir Naseem, and ¨Ozg¨ur E. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Mixing thermal coherent states for precision and range en- hancement in quantum thermometry,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 015044 (2024)
2024
-
[54]
Individual quantum probes for optimal ther- mometry,
Luis A. Correa, Mohammad Mehboudi, Gerardo Adesso, and Anna Sanpera, “Individual quantum probes for optimal ther- mometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 220405 (2015)
2015
-
[56]
Nonequilibrium readiness and precision of gaus- sian quantum thermometers,
Luca Mancino, Marco G. Genoni, Marco Barbieri, and Mauro Paternostro, “Nonequilibrium readiness and precision of gaus- sian quantum thermometers,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033498 (2020)
2020
-
[57]
Operational significance of nonclassicality in nonequilibrium gaussian quantum thermom- etry,
Safoura Mirkhalaf, Mohammad Mehboudi, Zohre Nafari Qaleh, and Saleh Rahimi-Keshari, “Operational significance of nonclassicality in nonequilibrium gaussian quantum thermom- etry,” New J. Phys.26, 023046 (2024)
2024
-
[58]
Harnessing coher- ence generation for precision single- and two-qubit quantum thermometry,
Y . Aiache, A. El Allati, and K. El Anouz, “Harnessing coher- ence generation for precision single- and two-qubit quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A110, 032605 (2024)
2024
-
[59]
Low-temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence generation,
A. Ullah, M. Tahir Naseem, and ¨Ozg¨ur E. M ¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Low-temperature quantum thermometry boosted by coherence generation,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 043184 (2023)
2023
-
[60]
Fluores- cence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of sin- gle spins in diamond,
David M. Toyli, Charles F. de las Casas, David J. Christle, Vi- atcheslav V . Dobrovitski, and David D. Awschalom, “Fluores- cence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of sin- gle spins in diamond,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 8417–8421 (2013)
2013
-
[61]
Quantum simulation of single-qubit thermometry using linear optics,
Luca Mancino, Marco Sbroscia, Ilaria Gianani, Emanuele Roc- cia, and Marco Barbieri, “Quantum simulation of single-qubit thermometry using linear optics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130502 (2017)
2017
-
[62]
Discrimina- tion of thermal baths by single-qubit probes,
Ilaria Gianani, Donato Farina, Marco Barbieri, Valeria Ci- mini, Vasco Cavina, and Vittorio Giovannetti, “Discrimina- tion of thermal baths by single-qubit probes,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033497 (2020)
2020
-
[63]
Estimating temperature via sequential measurements,
Antonella De Pasquale, Kazuya Yuasa, and Vittorio Giovan- netti, “Estimating temperature via sequential measurements,” Phys. Rev. A 96, 012316 (2017)
2017
-
[64]
Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry,
Vasco Cavina, Luca Mancino, Antonella De Pasquale, Ilaria Gianani, Marco Sbroscia, Robert I. Booth, Emanuele Roccia, Roberto Raimondi, Vittorio Giovannetti, and Marco Barbieri, “Bridging thermodynamics and metrology in nonequilibrium quantum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A98, 050101 (2018)
2018
-
[65]
Fundamental limits on low-temperature quantum thermome- try with finite resolution,
Patrick P. Potts, Jonatan Bohr Brask, and Nicolas Brunner, “Fundamental limits on low-temperature quantum thermome- try with finite resolution,” Quantum 3, 161 (2019)
2019
-
[66]
Global and local thermometry schemes in coupled quantum systems,
Steve Campbell, Mohammad Mehboudi, Gabriele De Chiara, and Mauro Paternostro, “Global and local thermometry schemes in coupled quantum systems,” New J. Phys. 19, 103003 (2017)
2017
-
[67]
Approaching heisenberg- scalable thermometry with built-in robustness against noise,
Da-Jian Zhang and D. M. Tong, “Approaching heisenberg- scalable thermometry with built-in robustness against noise,” npj Quantum Inf. 8, 81 (2022)
2022
-
[68]
Dynamical approach to ancilla-assisted quan- tum thermometry,
Alexander Holm Kiilerich, Antonella De Pasquale, and Vitto- rio Giovannetti, “Dynamical approach to ancilla-assisted quan- tum thermometry,” Phys. Rev. A98, 042124 (2018)
2018
-
[69]
Enhancement of sensitivity in low-temperature quan- tum thermometry via reinforcement learning,
Qing-Shou Tan, Xulin Liu, Lan Xu, Wei Wu, and Le-Man Kuang, “Enhancement of sensitivity in low-temperature quan- tum thermometry via reinforcement learning,” Phys. Rev. A 109, 042417 (2024). 18
2024
-
[70]
Achieving heisenberg scaling by probe-ancilla interaction in quantum metrology,
Jingyi Fan and Shengshi Pang, “Achieving heisenberg scaling by probe-ancilla interaction in quantum metrology,” Phys. Rev. A 110, 062406 (2024)
2024
-
[71]
A thermodynamic theory of “weak
I. Dzyaloshinsky, “A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferro- magnetism of antiferromagnetics,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241–255 (1958)
1958
-
[72]
Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism,
T ˆoru Moriya, “Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism,” Phys. Rev.120, 91–98 (1960)
1960
-
[73]
Dzyaloshinskii-moriya and dipole-dipole interactions affect coupling-based landau-majorana-st¨uckelberg-zener tran- sitions,
R. Grimaudo, H. Nakazato, A. Messina, and N. V . Vi- tanov, “Dzyaloshinskii-moriya and dipole-dipole interactions affect coupling-based landau-majorana-st¨uckelberg-zener tran- sitions,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033092 (2020)
2020
-
[74]
Quantum entanglement and quantum phase transition in the xy model with staggered dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,
Fu-Wu Ma, Sheng-Xin Liu, and Xiang-Mu Kong, “Quantum entanglement and quantum phase transition in the xy model with staggered dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,” Phys. Rev. A 84, 042302 (2011)
2011
-
[75]
Bending the rules of low- temperature thermometry with periodic driving,
Jonas Glatthard and Luis A. Correa, “Bending the rules of low- temperature thermometry with periodic driving,” Quantum 6, 705 (2022)
2022
-
[76]
Simulating and optimising quantum thermometry using single photons,
W. K. Tham, H. Ferretti, A. V . Sadashivan, and A. M. Stein- berg, “Simulating and optimising quantum thermometry using single photons,” Sci. Rep. 6, 38822 (2016)
2016
-
[77]
Spin transport in a tunable heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms,
Paul Niklas Jepsen, Jesse Amato-Grill, Ivana Dimitrova, Wen Wei Ho, Eugene Demler, and Wolfgang Ketterle, “Spin transport in a tunable heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms,” Nature 588, 403–407 (2020)
2020
-
[78]
Spectroscopy and critical quantum ther- mometry in the ultrastrong coupling regime,
M Salado-Mej ´ıa, R Rom ´an-Ancheyta, F Soto-Eguibar, and H M Moya-Cessa, “Spectroscopy and critical quantum ther- mometry in the ultrastrong coupling regime,” Quantum Science and Technology 6, 025010 (2021)
2021
-
[79]
Criticality-enhanced precision in phase thermometry,
Mei Yu, H. Chau Nguyen, and Stefan Nimmrichter, “Criticality-enhanced precision in phase thermometry,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043094 (2024)
2024
-
[80]
Revers- ing the direction of heat flow using quantum correlations,
Kaonan Micadei, John P. S. Peterson, Alexandre M. Souza, Roberto S. Sarthour, Ivan S. Oliveira, Gabriel T. Landi, Tiago B. Batalh˜ao, Roberto M. Serra, and Eric Lutz, “Revers- ing the direction of heat flow using quantum correlations,” Nat. Commun. 10, 2456 (2019)
2019
-
[81]
Quantum simulations with trapped ions,
R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, “Quantum simulations with trapped ions,” Nature Physics 8, 277–284 (2012)
2012
-
[82]
Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions,
Philip Richerme, Zhe-Xuan Gong, Aaron Lee, Crystal Senko, Jacob Smith, Michael Foss-Feig, Spyridon Michalakis, Alexey V . Gorshkov, and Christopher Monroe, “Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions,” Nature 511, 198–201 (2014)
2014
-
[83]
Effective quantum spin systems with trapped ions,
D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, “Effective quantum spin systems with trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 207901 (2004)
2004
-
[84]
Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals,
A. Bermudez, M. Bruderer, and M. B. Plenio, “Controlling and measuring quantum transport of heat in trapped-ion crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 040601 (2013)
2013
-
[85]
Synthesis of antisymmetric spin exchange interaction and chiral spin clusters in superconducting circuits,
Da-Wei Wang et al., “Synthesis of antisymmetric spin exchange interaction and chiral spin clusters in superconducting circuits,” Nature Physics 15, 382–386 (2019)
2019
-
[86]
Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit,
R. Barends et al., “Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit,” Nature 534, 222–226 (2016)
2016
-
[87]
Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases,
Victor Galitski and Ian B. Spielman, “Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases,” Nature 494, 49–54 (2013)
2013
-
[88]
Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases,
Immanuel Bloch, Jean Dalibard, and Sylvain Nascimb `ene, “Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases,” Nature Physics 8, 267–276 (2012)
2012
-
[89]
Skyrmions on the track,
Albert Fert, Vincent Cros, and Jo ˜ao Sampaio, “Skyrmions on the track,” Nature Nanotechnology 8, 152–156 (2013)
2013
-
[90]
Quantum computation with quantum dots,
Daniel Loss and David P. DiVincenzo, “Quantum computation with quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. A57, 120–126 (1998)
1998
-
[91]
Direct observation of quantum criticality in ising spin chains,
Jingfu Zhang, Fernando M. Cucchietti, C. M. Chandrashekar, Martin Laforest, Colm A. Ryan, Michael Ditty, Adam Hubbard, John K. Gamble, and Raymond Laflamme, “Direct observation of quantum criticality in ising spin chains,” Phys. Rev. A 79, 012305 (2009)
2009
-
[92]
Anisotropic exchange interaction of localized conduction-band electrons in semiconductors,
K. V . Kavokin, “Anisotropic exchange interaction of localized conduction-band electrons in semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B64, 075305 (2001)
2001
-
[93]
Two-path transport measure- ments on a triple quantum dot,
M. C. Rogge and R. J. Haug, “Two-path transport measure- ments on a triple quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 193306 (2008)
2008
-
[94]
Charge frustration in a triangular triple quantum dot,
M. Seo, H. K. Choi, S.-Y . Lee, N. Kim, Y . Chung, H.-S. Sim, V . Umansky, and D. Mahalu, “Charge frustration in a triangular triple quantum dot,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 046803 (2013)
2013
-
[95]
Fisher information under decoherence in bloch represen- tation,
Wei Zhong, Zhe Sun, Jian Ma, Xiaoguang Wang, and Franco Nori, “Fisher information under decoherence in bloch represen- tation,” Phys. Rev. A87, 022337 (2013)
2013
-
[96]
Explicit formulae for the bures metric,
J Dittmann, “Explicit formulae for the bures metric,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 2663 (1999)
1999
-
[97]
Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2007)
2007
-
[98]
Lecture notes on the theory of open quantum systems,
Daniel A. Lidar, “Lecture notes on the theory of open quantum systems,” (2020), arXiv:1902.00967 [quant-ph]
2020 arXiv
-
[99]
Heat rectification by two qubits cou- pled with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,
Vipul Upadhyay, M. Tahir Naseem, Rahul Marathe, and ¨Ozg¨ur E. M¨ustecaplıo˘glu, “Heat rectification by two qubits cou- pled with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction,” Phys. Rev. E104, 054137 (2021)
2021
-
[100]
Statistical dis- tance and the geometry of quantum states,
Samuel L. Braunstein and Carlton M. Caves, “Statistical dis- tance and the geometry of quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439–3443 (1994)
1994
Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.