Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Black Holes as Condensation Points of Fuzzy Dark Matter Cores

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims black holes seed fuzzy dark matter core condensation, with the hole's mass setting the core's central density: heavier black holes produce flatter, less dense cores.

desk verdict Solid simulation study with a real seed-statistics problem: the headline BH-mass/core-density trend rests on one random-phase seed per mass. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15465 v3 pith:QCRJOIMA submitted 2024-12-19 astro-ph.GA gr-qc

Curicaveri Palomares-Chavez , Ivan Alvarez-Rios , Francisco S. Guzman This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords fuzzydarkmatterblackholescorecondensationkineticrelaxationSchrödinger-PoissonsystemcoresBose-Einsteincondensatessoliton
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that black holes can act as condensation points for fuzzy dark matter: places where the ultralight-boson dark matter gathers, through kinetic relaxation, into a dense core. In the simulations, the dark matter first collapses into a small clump at a random location; the clump then merges with the black hole, and once the two coincide, the core condenses with its density centered on the hole. The resulting core matches the stationary solutions of the fuzzy-dark-matter-plus-black-hole eigenvalue problem, and its central density falls as the hole's mass rises, because the moving hole drags and scatters the dark matter around it. The paper also supplies a phenomenological formula, $\rho(r) = \rho_c e^{-\ln 2\,(r/r_c)^\beta}$, for fitting such cores. If the claim holds, black hole mass becomes a parameter that generates a diversity of central dark matter densities in galaxies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Schrödinger-Poisson system (Eqs. 1–4) evolved with the spectral code CAFE-FDM, with the black hole represented as a Gaussian density spike (Eq. 5) that moves under the gravitational pull of the dark matter. Core formation is driven by kinetic relaxation: random phases in momentum space create overdensities that collapse on a characteristic condensation time, and in the presence of the hole that collapse is redirected around the hole. The target states are the stationary solutions of the FDM+BH eigenvalue problem of Appendix B, parametrized by the scale-invariant quantity $\alpha = M_{\rm BH}^2/\psi_0$; the diagnostics use the phenomenological density $\rho(r,\alpha) = \rho_c e^{-\ln 2\,(r/r_c)^\beta}$ with $r_c$ and $\beta$ fitted functions of $\alpha$. The contrast between the fully coupled runs and the test-field runs of Appendix C is what isolates the role of the hole's motion in flattening the core.

What would settle it

Repeat the four black hole masses with several new random-phase seeds — the paper ran 32 seeds in total but reports the mass trend for only one. If the central core density stops falling, or rises, as the hole mass grows, the mass-dependence claim fails. A direct observational check would compare central dark matter densities in galaxies with known black hole masses: the paper's mechanism predicts a systematic suppression at the heavy-hole end.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Black holes serve as seeds for fuzzy dark matter core formation. Starting from random-phase initial conditions in the kinetic-relaxation picture, a mini-cluster of dark matter forms away from the hole, merges with it, and condensation then proceeds with the fuzzy dark matter density centered on the black hole, acquiring a profile consistent with the stationary solution of the Schrödinger-Poisson system with a central black hole. The additional finding is that the central density of the condensed core decreases with increasing black hole mass: the hole's permanent oscillatory motion relative to the core back-reacts on the dark matter and scatters it, flattening the center. The paper establishes the causal role of this motion by evolving a test-field case in which the hole does not back-react, finding no central density decrease. As a supporting result, it constructs a phenomenological fit to the stationary FDM+BH solutions that reproduces the time-averaged profiles of the simulated cores.

Load-bearing premise

The four simulations that establish the mass dependence all begin from the same random arrangement of the dark matter wave phases and differ only in the black hole's mass, so the result assumes that one arrangement represents all arrangements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Black hole mass becomes a parameter that produces a diversity of central fuzzy dark matter core densities, giving the model a new way to account for galaxies with different central dark matter profiles.
  • Cores that condense around black holes relax toward the stationary FDM+BH eigenstates, so the phenomenological formula (B6)–(B8) can fit simulated or observed cores and return the control parameter $\alpha$.
  • A black hole inside a granular fuzzy dark matter core oscillates relative to the core — period of order 14 Myr for the lightest hole simulated — a motion the paper ties to possible variability near supermassive black holes.
  • The central-density suppression disappears when the hole is held fixed, so the flattening is a dynamical signature of the hole's back-reaction and scattering, not a static equilibrium effect.
  • In galactic cores hosting supermassive black holes, the predicted suppression of central dark matter density offers a consistency check that could support or challenge the fuzzy dark matter model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the four-mass trend rests on a single random realization, the claim's natural stress test is an ensemble average over seeds; that check is the direct next step and is not in the paper.
  • If the trend survives an ensemble, it implies an observable hierarchy: among galaxies of similar total mass, those with heavier central black holes should have flatter fuzzy dark matter cores — a correlation that could be tested with existing core-profile data.
  • The hole's oscillatory motion inside the core produces a time-varying gravitational potential at the granularity frequency; that could show up as timing noise in pulsar observations near galactic centers or as dephasing in gravitational-wave inspirals, a consequence the paper leaves implicit.
  • In the heavy-hole limit the stationary solutions approach hydrogen-atom profiles, so very heavy black holes should carve nearly exponential dark matter cores; fitting the profile shape could let observers infer the hole's mass from dark matter data alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents 3D simulations of fuzzy dark matter (FDM) condensation in the presence of a black hole (BH), using the kinetic relaxation approach with random initial conditions. The authors find that a pre-collapsed minicluster merges with the BH, after which FDM condensation proceeds with the density centered on the BH. They also report that the BH's motion relative to the core flattens the central FDM density, with larger BH masses producing smaller central core densities. As a collateral result, the paper revises the stationary FDM+BH eigenvalue problem and proposes a phenomenological fitting formula.

Significance. If the central quantitative claim holds, the paper establishes a new physical mechanism—BH-induced flattening of FDM cores—that introduces a BH-mass dependence into core densities and could yield observable predictions for FDM models. The paper is careful in its numerical setup: it validates the code against the standard condensation simulation of Chen et al. (2021), includes a test-field experiment that supports the interpretation that BH motion causes the flattening, and provides a revised stationary solution with a practical fitting formula. These are genuine strengths. However, the headline quantitative result is currently supported by a single random-phase seed for each BH mass, which limits the statistical robustness of the claim.

major comments (1)
  1. [III.A, III.D, Fig. 5] The central claim that the central core density decreases with increasing BH mass rests on only one random-phase seed. Section III.A states that 32 simulations with different seeds were performed, but the four simulations used for the main comparison share a single seed and differ only in MBH. Section III.C explicitly notes that the four mergers occur at different places, times, and velocities, so the observed trend in Fig. 5 is not isolated from the specifics of this one merger geometry. The authors should provide seed-averaged central densities with error bars, or at least demonstrate that the trend is robust across several independent seeds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'withe' should be 'with'.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B5)] The first-order system as printed is not a valid reduction of the eigenvalue problem; the first equation appears to be missing the derivative of ψ, and the third line contains an extraneous ψ. Please correct this so the stationary solution construction is reproducible.
  3. [Section III.A] The paper mentions that the 32 simulations can be classified into two sets, but it does not report how many seeds fall into each class. Since the main analysis uses a single realization of the second class, this prevalence is important context.
  4. [Figure 5] The fit quality is described only qualitatively. Please report the reduced chi-square or a similar goodness-of-fit statistic for the profiles in Fig. 5.
  5. [Introduction] The phrase 'since initial time' should be 'from the initial time'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main results are dynamical simulation outcomes, and the stationary-profile formulas are used as a fitting diagnostic rather than as a predicted output.

full rationale

The central claims—that BHs seed FDM core condensation and that the central core density depends on BH mass—are derived directly from Schrödinger-Poisson simulations with a Gaussian BH potential (Eq. 5) and random-phase initial conditions; they are not equivalent by construction to any input. The condensation claim is a dynamical outcome: the minicluster forms at a random location and later merges with the BH (Sec. III.A, Fig. 1), so the BH is not placed at the condensation site by definition. The BH-mass trend in Fig. 5 comes from four simulations sharing one random-phase seed but differing in MBH; this is a statistical robustness issue (single realization, no seed averaging), not circularity, and the paper acknowledges that the mergers occur under different conditions with different velocities and locations (Sec. III.C). The stationary-solution machinery (Appendix B) is used only as a fitting family: formulas (B6)-(B8) are phenomenological fits to the eigen-solutions, and fitting the simulated profiles with them is a consistency check, not a prediction claimed from first principles. Self-citations (e.g., [43] for the code, [45] and [47] for context) are not load-bearing for the central derivation; the load-bearing methodology cites external work ([15,16] for kinetic relaxation, [42] for the eigen-problem, [24] for BH oscillation dynamics) or is validated in-paper against [16]. No step reduces to a self-citation chain or to a definitional equivalence, so there is no demonstrable circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the standard Schroedinger-Poisson description of FDM, a Newtonian moving BH model that ignores accretion, the kinetic-relaxation initial-condition framework, and the choice to compare time-averaged profiles with stationary solutions via a fitted phenomenological formula. The main fitted parameters are the constants in the phenomenological density model and the per-profile fit parameters used to extract central densities.

free parameters (5)
  • Constants a1-a4 in core-radius formula (B7) = a1=-0.25355872, a2=0.46241994, a3=0.0663722, a4=0.33407792
    Fitted to the numerical family of FDM+BH stationary solutions to reproduce r_c(alpha); these constants enter the phenomenological density model applied to simulation profiles.
  • Constants b1-b5 in exponent formula (B8) = b1=-1.08334305, b2=0.77866182, b3=0.81228993, b4=6.72089826, b5=1.84588407
    Fitted to the numerical family of stationary solutions to reproduce beta(alpha); these constants also enter the phenomenological density model.
  • Per-profile fit parameters (rho_c, r_c, beta) in Eq. (B6) = Varies per simulation; central densities reported in Fig. 5
    Each simulated density profile is fitted with the phenomenological density formula; the extracted central density is the basis for the BH-mass dependence claim, so these fit parameters carry the result.
  • BH Gaussian width epsilon = 0.1 Delta x
    Numerical smoothing of the BH density chosen to match the potential regularization in Boey et al. 2024; not a physical parameter.
  • Initial momentum-space width sigma = 1 (code units; about 65 km/s)
    Width of the Gaussian random-phase initial conditions, inherited from Chen et al. 2021; the condensation time depends on this choice.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption FDM is described by the Newtonian Schroedinger-Poisson system (Eqs. 1-4).
    Standard non-relativistic treatment of ultralight bosonic dark matter at galactic scales; neglects general relativistic corrections.
  • domain assumption The black hole can be modeled as a moving Gaussian density distribution that does not accrete wave dark matter.
    Section II.A Eq. (5); accretion is explicitly neglected, justified by citing refs. [39,40].
  • domain assumption Core formation can be studied with kinetic relaxation from random-phase Gaussian momentum-space initial conditions.
    Section II.B; follows the approach of Levkov et al. [15] and Chen et al. [16].
  • domain assumption Periodic boundary conditions with a mean-density-subtracted Poisson equation are adequate on a box of side L.
    Section II.A; prior work by the same group [13,14] studied boundary-condition effects, but the impact on the BH-seeded runs is not quantified here.
  • domain assumption The time-averaged density over t in [70,100] can be compared with a stationary solution of the FDM+BH eigenvalue problem.
    Section III.D and Fig. 5; assumes the core has reached a quasi-equilibrium state in that window.
  • standard math The shooting-method solutions of the eigenvalue problem (B5) with isolation boundary conditions are the relevant stationary attractors.
    Appendix B; the numerical solution of the eigenvalue problem is standard, but its status as an attractor of the dynamical system is an assumption supported only by the fits.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Black Holes as Condensation Points of Fuzzy Dark Matter Cores." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QCRJOIMA

@misc{pith2026241215465,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Black Holes as Condensation Points of Fuzzy Dark Matter Cores},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QCRJOIMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15465}
}
read the original abstract

We simulate the formation of Fuzzy Dark Matter (FDM) cores in the presence of a Black Hole (BH) to explore whether BHs can serve as seeds for FDM core condensation. Our analysis is based on the core-condensation via the kinetic relaxation process for random initial conditions of the FDM. In a generic scenario the BH merges with a pre-collapsed mini-cluster formed in a random location, once they share location the core-condensation starts withe the FDM density centered at the black hole that during the process acquires a profile consistent with that of the stationary solution of the FDM+BH eigenvalue problem. These results indicate that BHs can indeed act as focal points for FDM core condensation. Furthermore, we find that the central density of the resulting FDM core depends on the mass of the BH, which due to its permanent motion relative to the FDM core during the evolution, produces a smaller core density for bigger BH masses; in this way the BH mass is a parameter leading to a new diversity of central FDM core densities. As a collateral result, for our analysis we revised the construction of stationary solutions of FDM+BH and found a phenomenological formula for the FDM density that can be used to fit FDM cores around BHs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15465 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Snapshots of the density projected on a plane that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Distance from the location of maximum FDM density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. FIG. 5. Density fitting of the angularly and time aver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Snapshots of the density on a plane that passes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Maximum density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Solution densities obtained from the numerical solu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Oscillation of the central density for configurations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Snapshots of the density at different times for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Accretion of multipolar massive complex scalar field packets by a Schwarzschild black hole

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mode-by-mode numerical accretion maps show that Gaussian massive scalar packets around a Schwarzschild black hole accrete with efficiency set by k0 and ℓ, acquiring a low-k0 partial-accretion floor when Rs/λC > 1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Self-gravitating bose-einstein condensates,

    Pierre-Henri Chavanis, “Self-gravitating bose-einstein condensates,” in Quantum Aspects of Black Holes , edited by Xavier Calmet (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2015) pp. 151–194

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Small-scale structure of fuzzy and axion-like dark matter,

    Jens C. Niemeyer, “Small-scale structure of fuzzy and axion-like dark matter,” Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 113, 103787 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Wave dark matter,

    Lam Hui, “Wave dark matter,” Annual Review of As- tronomy and Astrophysics 59, 247–289 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Ultra-Light Dark Matter,

    Elisa G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-Light Dark Matter,” arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2005.03254 (2020), arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Co- herent Dark Wave,

    Hsi-Yu Schive, Tzihong Chiueh, and Tom Broadhurst, “Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Co- herent Dark Wave,” Nature Phys. 10, 496–499 (2014a), arXiv:1406.6586 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Galaxy formation with becdm i. turbu- lence and relaxation of idealized haloes,

    Philip Mocz, Mark Vogelsberger, Victor H. Robles, Jes´ us Zavala, Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Anastasia Fialkov, and Lars Hernquist, “Galaxy formation with becdm i. turbu- lence and relaxation of idealized haloes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 4559–4570 (2017), arXiv:1705.05845 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Formation and structure of ultralight bosonic dark mat- ter halos,

    Jan Veltmaat, Jens C. Niemeyer, and Bodo Schwabe, “Formation and structure of ultralight bosonic dark mat- ter halos,” Physical Review D 98 (2018), 10.1103/phys- revd.98.043509

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2018

  8. [8]

    First star-forming structures in fuzzy cosmic filaments,

    Philip Mocz, Anastasia Fialkov, Mark Vogelsberger, Fer- nando Becerra, Mustafa A. Amin, Sownak Bose, Michael Boylan-Kolchin, Pierre-Henri Chavanis, Lars Hernquist, Lachlan Lancaster, Federico Marinacci, Victor H. Robles, and Jes´ us Zavala, “First star-forming structures in fuzzy cosmic filaments,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 141301 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Structure formation in large-volume cosmological simulations of fuzzy dark matter: impact of the non-linear dynamics,

    Simon May and Volker Springel, “Structure formation in large-volume cosmological simulations of fuzzy dark matter: impact of the non-linear dynamics,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 506, 2603– 2618 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Deep zoom-in simulation of a fuzzy dark matter galactic halo,

    Bodo Schwabe and Jens C. Niemeyer, “Deep zoom-in simulation of a fuzzy dark matter galactic halo,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 181301 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations,

    Hsi-Yu Schive, Ming-Hsuan Liao, Tak-Pong Woo, Shing- Kwong Wong, Tzihong Chiueh, Tom Broadhurst, and W. Y. Pauchy Hwang, “Understanding the Core-Halo Relation of Quantum Wave Dark Matter from 3D Simulations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 261302 (2014), arXiv:1407.7762 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Simulations of solitonic core mergers in ultralight ax- ion dark matter cosmologies,

    Bodo Schwabe, Jens C. Niemeyer, and Jan F. Engels, “Simulations of solitonic core mergers in ultralight ax- ion dark matter cosmologies,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 043513 (2016), arXiv:1606.05151 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Effect of boundary conditions on structure for- mation in fuzzy dark matter,

    Iv´ an´Alvarez-Rios, Francisco S. Guzm´ an, and Paul R. Shapiro, “Effect of boundary conditions on structure for- mation in fuzzy dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 123524 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Effects of bound- ary conditions on the core-halo mass scaling relation of fuzzy dark matter structures,

    Iv´ an´Alvarez-Rios and F. S Guzm´ an, “Effects of bound- ary conditions on the core-halo mass scaling relation of fuzzy dark matter structures,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 023530 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Gravita- tional bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,

    D. G. Levkov, A. G. Panin, and I. I. Tkachev, “Gravita- tional bose-einstein condensation in the kinetic regime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 151301 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter ha- los,

    Jiajun Chen, Xiaolong Du, Erik W. Lentz, David J. E. Marsh, and Jens C. Niemeyer, “New insights into the formation and growth of boson stars in dark matter ha- los,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 083022 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Formation and mass growth of axion stars in axion miniclusters,

    Benedikt Eggemeier and Jens C. Niemeyer, “Formation and mass growth of axion stars in axion miniclusters,” Phys. Rev. D 100, 063528 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Gravitational bose- einstein condensation of vector or hidden photon dark matter,

    Jiajun Chen, Xiaolong Du, Mingzhen Zhou, Andrew Benson, and David J. E. Marsh, “Gravitational bose- einstein condensation of vector or hidden photon dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 083021 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Formation of a bose star in a rotating cloud,

    Kuldeep J. Purohit, Pravin Kumar Natwariya, Jitesh R. Bhatt, and Prashant K. Mehta, “Formation of a bose star in a rotating cloud,” Astrophysics and Space Science 368 (2023), 10.1007/s10509-023-04253-8

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Novel structures and collapse of solitons in nonminimally gravitating dark matter halos,

    Jiajun Chen and Hong-Yi Zhang, “Novel structures and collapse of solitons in nonminimally gravitating dark matter halos,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024, 005 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Mass-radius relation of self- gravitating bose-einstein condensates with a central black hole,

    Pierre-Henri Chavanis, “Mass-radius relation of self- gravitating bose-einstein condensates with a central black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 352 (2019). 7

    2019

  14. [22]

    Core mass-halo mass relation of bosonic and fermionic dark matter halos harboring a su- permassive black hole,

    Pierre-Henri Chavanis, “Core mass-halo mass relation of bosonic and fermionic dark matter halos harboring a su- permassive black hole,” Physical Review D 101 (2020), 10.1103/physrevd.101.063532

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Dynamical friction from ultralight dark matter,

    Yourong Wang and Richard Easther, “Dynamical friction from ultralight dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 063523 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Dynamical friction and black holes in ultralight dark matter solitons,

    Russell Boey, Yourong Wang, Emily Kendall, and Richard Easther, “Dynamical friction and black holes in ultralight dark matter solitons,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 103526 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Final parsec problem of black hole mergers and ultralight dark matter,

    Hyeonmo Koo, Dongsu Bak, Inkyu Park, Sungwook E. Hong, and Jae-Weon Lee, “Final parsec problem of black hole mergers and ultralight dark matter,” Physics Letters B 856, 138908 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Boosting su- permassive black hole growth in the early universe by fuzzy dark matter solitons,

    H.-H. Sandy Chiu, Hsi-Yu Schive, Hsiang-Yi Karen Yang, Hsinhao Huang, and Massimo Gaspari, “Boosting su- permassive black hole growth in the early universe by fuzzy dark matter solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 051402 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Supermassive black hole binaries in ul- tralight dark matter,

    Benjamin C. Bromley, Pearl Sandick, and Barmak Shams Es Haghi, “Supermassive black hole binaries in ul- tralight dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 023517 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Scattering of wave dark matter by supermassive black holes,

    Giovanni Maria Tomaselli, “Scattering of wave dark matter by supermassive black holes,” (2025), arXiv:2501.00090 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Ejection of supermassive black holes and implica- tions for merger rates in fuzzy dark matter haloes,

    Amr A El-Zant, Zacharias Roupas, and Joseph Silk, “Ejection of supermassive black holes and implica- tions for merger rates in fuzzy dark matter haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499, 2575–2586 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Dynamical friction in a fuzzy dark matter uni- verse,

    Lachlan Lancaster, Cara Giovanetti, Philip Mocz, Yonatan Kahn, Mariangela Lisanti, and David N. Spergel, “Dynamical friction in a fuzzy dark matter uni- verse,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020, 001–001 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Parasitic black holes: The swallowing of a fuzzy dark matter soliton,

    Vitor Cardoso, Taishi Ikeda, Rodrigo Vicente, and Miguel Zilh˜ ao, “Parasitic black holes: The swallowing of a fuzzy dark matter soliton,” Physical Review D 106 (2022), 10.1103/physrevd.106.l121302

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Relativistic drag forces on black holes from scalar dark matter clouds of all sizes,

    Dina Traykova, Rodrigo Vicente, Katy Clough, Thomas Helfer, Emanuele Berti, Pedro G. Ferreira, and Lam Hui, “Relativistic drag forces on black holes from scalar dark matter clouds of all sizes,” Physical Review D 108 (2023), 10.1103/physrevd.108.l121502

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Ac- cretion of self-interacting scalar field dark matter onto a reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole,

    Yuri Ravanal, Gabriel G´ omez, and Normal Cruz, “Ac- cretion of self-interacting scalar field dark matter onto a reissner-nordstr¨ om black hole,” Physical Review D 108 (2023), 10.1103/physrevd.108.083004

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Supersonic friction of a black hole traversing a self- interacting scalar dark matter cloud,

    Alexis Boudon, Philippe Brax, and Patrick Valageas, “Supersonic friction of a black hole traversing a self- interacting scalar dark matter cloud,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 103517 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Black hole merger simulations in wave dark matter environments,

    Jamie Bamber, Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Katy Clough, and Pedro G. Ferreira, “Black hole merger simulations in wave dark matter environments,” Physical Review D107 (2023), 10.1103/physrevd.107.024035

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Effect of wave dark matter on equal mass black hole mergers,

    Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Katy Clough, Jamie Bamber, and Pedro G. Ferreira, “Effect of wave dark matter on equal mass black hole mergers,” Physical Review Letters 132 (2024), 10.1103/physrevlett.132.211401

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Self-interacting scalar dark mat- ter around binary black holes,

    Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, James Marsden, Katy Clough, and Pedro G. Ferreira, “Self-interacting scalar dark mat- ter around binary black holes,” Physical Review D 110 (2024), 10.1103/physrevd.110.083011

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Axion star nucleation in dark mini- halos around primordial black holes,

    Mark P. Hertzberg, Enrico D. Schiappacasse, and Tsu- tomu T. Yanagida, “Axion star nucleation in dark mini- halos around primordial black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 023013 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Spherical nonlin- ear absorption of cosmological scalar fields onto a black hole,

    F. S. Guzm´ an and F. D. Lora-Clavijo, “Spherical nonlin- ear absorption of cosmological scalar fields onto a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 024036 (2012)

    2012

  32. [40]

    Fre- quency shift of light emitted from growing and shrinking black holes,

    F. G. Guzm´ an, I. Alvarez-R ´ ıos, and J. A. Gonz´ alez, “Fre- quency shift of light emitted from growing and shrinking black holes,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 084014 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Parasitic black holes: The swallowing of a fuzzy dark matter soliton,

    Vitor Cardoso, Taishi Ikeda, Rodrigo Vicente, and Miguel Zilh˜ ao, “Parasitic black holes: The swallowing of a fuzzy dark matter soliton,” Phys. Rev. D 106, L121302 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Fuzzy dark matter soliton cores around supermassive black holes,

    Elliot Y Davies and Philip Mocz, “Fuzzy dark matter soliton cores around supermassive black holes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492, 5721– 5729 (2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    Explo- ration of simple scenarios involving fuzzy dark matter cores and gas at local scales,

    Iv´ an ´Alvarez-Rios and Francisco S Guzm´ an, “Explo- ration of simple scenarios involving fuzzy dark matter cores and gas at local scales,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518, 3838–3849 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Supplementary material,

    C. Palomares-C´ avez, I. Alvarez-Rios, and F. S Guzm´ an, “Supplementary material,” https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AZ-3B37CXU_ MYTjrmUswvD3FYN8uZkzU/view, accessed: 2024-12-18

    2024

  37. [45]

    Unveiling orbital chaos: The wild heart of fuzzy dark matter struc- tures,

    Ivan Alvarez-Rios and Francisco S. Guzman, “Unveiling orbital chaos: The wild heart of fuzzy dark matter struc- tures,” (2025), arXiv:2502.20205 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    The Ac- curate Mass Distribution of M87, the Giant Galaxy with Imaged Shadow of Its Supermassive Black Hole, as a Por- tal to New Physics,

    Mariafelicia De Laurentis and Paolo Salucci, “The Ac- curate Mass Distribution of M87, the Giant Galaxy with Imaged Shadow of Its Supermassive Black Hole, as a Por- tal to New Physics,” Astrophys. J. 929, 17 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Fermion-boson stars as attractors in fuzzy dark matter and ideal gas dynamics,

    Ivan Alvarez-Rios, Francisco S. Guzman, and Jens Niemeyer, “Fermion-boson stars as attractors in fuzzy dark matter and ideal gas dynamics,” (2024), arXiv:2412.13382 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  40. [48]

    Evolution of the schr¨ odinger-newton system for a self-gravitating scalar field,

    F. S. Guzm´ an and L. Arturo Ure˜ na L´ opez, “Evolution of the schr¨ odinger-newton system for a self-gravitating scalar field,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 124033 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    Gravita- tional cooling of self-gravitating bose condensates,

    F. S. Guzm´ an and L. Arturo Ure˜ na L´ opez, “Gravita- tional cooling of self-gravitating bose condensates,” The Astrophysical Journal 645, 814-819 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Oscillation modes of ultralight bec dark matter cores,

    F. S. Guzm´ an, “Oscillation modes of ultralight bec dark matter cores,” Physical Review D 99 (2019), 10.1103/physrevd.99.083513. Appendix A: Pure FDM As a test we show the core condensation without a BH in Figure 6, that contains snapshots of the density at different times on...

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.