Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Chaotic orbital dynamics of pulsating stars around black holes surrounded by dark matter halos

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A pulsating star near a black hole surrounded by dark matter will tumble into chaotic orbital motion whenever its pulsation frequency is not one of a set of isolated special values, even if the pulsation is arbitrarily small.

desk verdict Solid Melnikov computation showing spherical pulsation triggers chaos only with ambient matter; main open issue is the unvalidated approximate halo metric. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15938 v1 pith:EFUHXEB6 submitted 2024-12-20 gr-qc astro-ph.HEnlin.CD

Tiago S. Amancio , Ricardo A. Mosna , Ronaldo S. S. Vieira This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEnlin.CD PACS 04.20.-q05.45.-a95.35.+d
keywords MelnikovmethodhomoclinicchaosDixonformalismpulsatingstarsdarkmatterhalosblackholeorbitsextreme-mass-ratioinspiralsquadrupolemoment
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a star's own rhythmic pulsation can scramble its orbit around a supermassive black hole. Working in a spacetime that combines a Schwarzschild black hole with a dark matter halo, the authors model the star as a spherical extended body whose quadrupole moment oscillates in time, and apply Melnikov's method to the near-homoclinic dynamics. They find that the Melnikov integral factorizes as a cosine of the phase times a frequency-dependent kernel, and that the kernel is nonzero for almost every pulsation frequency. Consequently, arbitrarily small pulsations produce a homoclinic tangle and chaotic orbits near the unstable circular orbits. Because stars inspiraling into galactic-center black holes have orbital periods of minutes to hours, the effect is in principle observable in the erratic redshift or light curve of a variable star, and in gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the factorization of Melnikov's integral, $M(\tau_0)=2\cos(\Omega\tau_0)K(\Omega)$, where $K(\Omega)$ is an integral along the unperturbed homoclinic orbit of the Poisson bracket of the unperturbed flow and the quadrupolar perturbation, weighted by $\sin(\Omega\tau)$. Melnikov's method is the standard tool for detecting when a time-periodic perturbation makes the stable and unstable manifolds of a hyperbolic fixed point intersect transversely; here the fixed point is the unstable circular orbit $(r=r_{\rm un}, p_r=0)$ and the perturbation is the oscillating quadrupole moment of the pulsating star. The cosine factor shows that the zeros of $M$ in the phase $\tau_0$ are simple and infinite whenever $K(\Omega)\neq 0$, and a numerical evaluation of $K$ shows it vanishes only at isolated frequencies. The other central ingredient is Dixon's formalism for extended bodies, which supplies the covariant equations of motion with a quadrupole force coupled to the Riemann tensor and its gradient; the resulting normalized Hamiltonian structure of the reduced radial system is what makes Melnikov's method applicable.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the full Dixon equations (18)–(19) with $j_m(\tau)=q_0[1+\sin(\Omega\tau)]$ for the metric (27)–(28) near $r_{\rm un}=4.5$, and construct a Poincaré section at the perturbation period: it should show a homoclinic tangle (scattered points) for generic $\Omega$ where $K(\Omega)\neq0$, and a smooth separatrix at the isolated frequencies where $K(\Omega)=0$; absence of scattered points for generic $\Omega$ would refute the Melnikov prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a spherical extended body with a periodically oscillating mass quadrupole, $j_m(\tau)=q_0[1+\sin(\Omega\tau)]$, moving in a spherically symmetric black-hole-plus-halo spacetime, develops homoclinic chaos near the unstable circular orbits. Using Dixon's quadrupolar equations of motion, the radial dynamics reduce to a nonautonomous two-dimensional Hamiltonian system; Melnikov's method then shows that the distance between the stable and unstable manifolds of the homoclinic orbit is proportional to $M(\tau_0)=2\cos(\Omega\tau_0)K(\Omega)$. Since $K(\Omega)$ is nonzero for almost all $\Omega$, the manifolds intersect transversely at a countable infinity of points, producing a homoclinic tangle for arbitrarily small $q_0$. The authors stress that the phenomenon requires ambient matter: in vacuum Schwarzschild spacetime, a spherically symmetric pulsating body does not deviate from geodesic motion at quadrupolar order, whereas the presence of the halo — or any self-gravitating surrounding matter — makes the orbit chaotic. They further argue that the effect is generic, applying to any small pulsating star near a supermassive black hole with a surrounding dark matter halo or galactic bulge.

Load-bearing premise

The whole demonstration rests on the approximate metric of Eqs. (27)–(28) being a genuine black-hole-plus-halo spacetime; if that metric does not actually solve Einstein's equations with a physically reasonable dark-matter fluid, the chaos is a property of a toy geometry rather than of real dark-matter environments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A pulsating star near a supermassive black hole surrounded by a dark matter halo should exhibit chaotic orbital motion for arbitrarily small pulsation amplitude, with chaos appearing unless the pulsation sits at one of the isolated zero frequencies of $K(\Omega)$.
  • The chaotic motion is imprinted on the star's redshift and light curve as seen from infinity: although the pulsation is periodic in proper time, the observed coordinate-time periods and the radial position wander erratically.
  • The same chaotic signature should appear in gravitational-wave signals from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, detectable in principle by future space-based observatories such as LISA.
  • The chaos is a direct consequence of ambient gravitating matter: in vacuum Schwarzschild spacetime, a spherically symmetric pulsating body follows regular orbits, whereas any self-gravitating surrounding fluid — dark matter halo or galactic bulge — makes the orbit chaotic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The isolated frequencies where $K(\Omega)=0$ provide a falsifiable prediction: a pulsating star whose pulsation frequency matches one of these special values should remain regular, offering a way to test the Melnikov result observationally or numerically.
  • The argument suggests that the chaos is generic for any periodic internal motion of the star, not just the fundamental radial mode; higher overtones or nonradial pulsations should also destabilize the orbit, potentially making chaotic motion the rule rather than the exception for variable stars near galactic nuclei.
  • Because the chaos is transient — the body eventually falls into the black hole — practical observability depends on whether the chaotic e-folding time is shorter than the inspiral timescale; a direct numerical estimate for SgrA*-like parameters would say whether current time-domain surveys could see the erratic light curve.
  • The mechanism could be turned around: a precisely measured chaotic redshift series from a star near a supermassive black hole would encode information about the surrounding matter distribution, effectively using stellar pulsations as a probe of dark matter halos.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the orbital dynamics of a spherically symmetric extended test body with a periodically oscillating quadrupole moment, jm(τ)=q0[1+sin(Ωτ)], in a spherically symmetric black-hole-plus-dark-matter-halo spacetime. Using Dixon's extended-body formalism, the authors reduce the translational motion to a two-dimensional non-autonomous system, verify its Hamiltonian structure (Eqs. (20)-(22)), compute unperturbed homoclinic orbits numerically, and apply Melnikov's method to show that the Melnikov integral takes the form M(τ0)=2cos(Ωτ0)K(Ω) with K(Ω) nonzero for almost all Ω. The numerical results use the approximate metric (27)-(28) of Konoplya and Zhidenko with parameters r0=2, M=10, a=105. The paper argues that this implies homoclinic chaos for arbitrarily small pulsation amplitude and discusses possible observational imprints in stellar light curves and gravitational-wave signals.

Significance. The central result, if physically grounded, is significant: it provides a concrete mechanism by which the most common radial stellar pulsation mode can induce homoclinic chaos in orbits near black holes, with potentially observable consequences for stars near SgrA* and for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals. The paper has clear strengths: the Melnikov reduction is explicit and analytic, the Hamiltonian structure conditions (20)-(22) are checked directly, and the function K(Ω) is computed by numerical quadrature along the geodesic rather than fitted to force a particular conclusion. The authors also correctly note the transient nature of the chaos. However, the physical interpretation rests on the approximate metric (27)-(28), whose validity as a solution of the Einstein field equations is not established; this makes the significance conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II.B, Eqs. (27)-(28)] All numerical results in the paper, including the homoclinic orbits and K(Ω) in Figs. 1-3, are obtained with the approximate metric (27)-(28), but the paper does not verify that this metric satisfies the Einstein field equations with a physically acceptable stress-energy tensor, nor does it quantify the deviation from the exact solution (23)-(26). This is load-bearing because the central claim is that chaos occurs in a black hole surrounded by a dark matter halo, not merely in a toy geometry. Please either repeat the calculation using the exact metric (23)-(26), or demonstrate that (27)-(28) is a valid approximation over the relevant radial range run ≤ r ≤ rm, including a bound on the metric error and a check of the energy conditions.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (44) and Fig. 3] The function K(Ω) is evaluated by numerical quadrature along the unperturbed homoclinic orbit, but no error estimate, grid resolution, or convergence check is reported. Since the conclusion that K(Ω)≠0 for almost all Ω and that M(τ0) has a countable infinity of simple zeros depends on the numerical values of K(Ω), the paper should provide quantitative evidence that the zeros of K(Ω) are isolated and that the sign changes in Fig. 3 are not numerical artifacts.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. VI] The abstract and the concluding paragraph state that the results were 'obtained for a specific exact solution,' but the calculations in Secs. III-V use only the approximate metric (27)-(28), not the exact solution (23)-(26). This discrepancy should be corrected, and if the claims are based on the approximation, the scope of the claims should be stated accordingly.
  4. [Sec. VI] The paper concludes that the phenomenon is 'generic' for any ambient self-gravitating matter and that even the galactic bulge would play the same role, but this assertion is not demonstrated. If it is intended as a conjecture, it should be labeled as such; if it is part of the paper's claims, it needs supporting argument or evidence from additional exact solutions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. V] The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna is misspelled as 'Laser Inteferometer Space Antenna' in the abstract and in Sec. V.
  2. [Sec. II.B] The statement that 'the method works for any choice of the functions f(r) and g(r)' is not exploited, since the paper restricts itself to the approximate metric (27)-(28); this is not an error but the scope of the paper should be stated more precisely.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (31)] The derivation of the potential V from the condition pμpμ=-m^2 is standard, but the definition of the constant m in the extended-body context is only discussed briefly; a few more details on why m becomes constant in the point-particle limit would improve clarity.
  4. [Sec. V, Eq. (45)] The expression for ωφ reinserts G and c after the paper has set G=c=1; this is acceptable, but the notation α and x should be defined explicitly at the point of use rather than introduced in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: K(Ω) is computed by quadrature along unperturbed geodesics, not fitted, and the Melnikov factorization follows from the homoclinic orbit's symmetry.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained, so no circular step is exhibited. The input perturbation jm(τ) = q0[1+sin(Ωτ)] (Sec. II.C, Eq. 29) is prescribed independently of the target claim; the unperturbed system is the jm = js = 0 limit of Eqs. (18)-(19), whose homoclinic orbits are computed numerically (Sec. III, Eqs. 31-36, Figs. 1-2) with no parameter fitted to force a positive result. The key reduction M(τ0) = 2cos(Ωτ0)K(Ω) (Eq. 43) follows from the even/odd symmetry of the homoclinic orbit, and K(Ω) (Eq. 44) is a genuine quadrature, not a fitted or renamed quantity; the conclusion that K ≠ 0 for almost all Ω is carried by the explicit numerical evaluation in Fig. 3 and could in principle have failed. Self-citations [72]-[74] supply Dixon-formalism methodology and the Schwarzschild contrast, but all working functions appear in Appendix A, so no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation. The manuscript itself flags its main support limitations: the metric (27)-(28) is introduced as 'an analytical approximation' matching the exact solution (23)-(26), with no error bound or energy-condition check, and the genericity claim in Sec. VI is argued rather than demonstrated; these are validity risks for the astrophysical interpretation, which under the present rules belong to correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are the quadrupole amplitude, the pulsation frequency, and the representative metric and orbit parameters chosen by hand. The main unverified input is the approximate halo metric, which is neither checked against the field equations nor bounded in error. The Melnikov analysis is a standard application of existing theory.

free parameters (5)
  • q0 = not specified; stated to range from 10^-12 to 10^-5
    Amplitude of the mass quadrupole oscillation; introduced by hand to model pulsation and serves as the small parameter for Melnikov's method.
  • Omega = varied over [0, 0.2] in Fig. 3
    Pulsation angular frequency; free parameter whose value must be comparable to orbital frequencies for the chaos to be physically manifest.
  • M (halo mass) = 10 (in units of BH mass r0/2)
    Chosen representative halo mass for the Hernquist-like profile; no justification given for this specific value.
  • a (halo scale length) = 105
    Chosen representative scale length for the halo; the paper says other metrics give similar results but does not demonstrate this.
  • run (unstable circular orbit radius) = 4.5 and 5.1
    Selected values for the homoclinic orbits; the paper states the range differs slightly from Schwarzschild but does not survey the full range.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The metric (27)-(28) describes a black hole surrounded by a Hernquist dark matter halo.
    Taken from Konoplya-Zhidenko [77]; the paper does not verify that it satisfies the Einstein equations or estimate the approximation error.
  • standard math Dixon's formalism up to quadrupole order gives the equations of motion for the test body.
    Standard framework in general relativity; the force and torque expressions are cited from the literature.
  • domain assumption The quadrupole moment can be prescribed arbitrarily with the given time dependence, subject only to symmetries and energy conditions.
    The choice js=0 and jm=q0(1+sin Omega tau) models radial pulsations; the paper does not show it arises from a specific stellar model.
  • domain assumption The unperturbed system has a homoclinic orbit associated with the unstable circular orbit.
    Computed numerically for run=4.5 and 5.1; assumed to persist within the range 4<run<6 without proof.
  • domain assumption The perturbation is small enough for the first-order Melnikov calculation to be valid.
    Melnikov's method requires a small perturbation parameter; the paper takes q0 small but does not quantify the domain of validity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaotic orbital dynamics of pulsating stars around black holes surrounded by dark matter halos." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EFUHXEB6

@misc{pith2026241215938,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaotic orbital dynamics of pulsating stars around black holes surrounded by dark matter halos},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EFUHXEB6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15938}
}
read the original abstract

We analyze the orbital dynamics of spherical test bodies in ``black hole surrounded by dark matter halo'' spherically symmetric spacetimes. When the test body pulsates periodically (such as a variable star), altering its quadrupole tensor, Melnikov's method shows that its orbital dynamics presents homoclinic chaos near the corresponding unstable circular orbits however small the oscillation amplitude is. Since for supermassive black holes the period of revolution of a star near the innermost stable circular orbit roughly spans time intervals from minutes to hours, the formalism can be applied in principle to the astrophysical scenario of a pulsating (variable) star inspiraling into a supermassive black hole, including the black hole SgrA* at the center of our Galaxy. The chaotic nature of its orbit, due to pulsation, is imprinted in the redshift time series of the emitted light and can, in principle, be observed in the corresponding light curves and even in gravitational-wave signals detected by future observatories such as the Laser Inteferometer Space Antenna. Also, although periodic with respect to the star's proper time, the chaotic orbital motion will produce an erratic light curve (and gravitational-wave signal) in terms of observed, coordinate time. Although our results were obtained for a specific exact solution, we argue that this phenomenon is generic for pulsating bodies immersed in black hole spacetimes surrounded by self-gravitating fluids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15938 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chaotic imprints of dark matter in extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    gr-qc 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A toy model shows that adding a hand-made angle-dependent force to dark-matter spacetimes produces visual chaos and irregular numerical-Kludge waveforms, but the force is not a realistic dark-matter perturbation.

  2. Effect of dark matter halo on transonic accretion flow around a galactic black hole

    astro-ph.HE 2025-01

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Lichtenberg and M

    A. Lichtenberg and M. Lieberman, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, Applied Mathematical Sciences Vol. 38 (Springer, New York, 1992)

    1992

  2. [2]

    Contopoulos, Order and chaos in dynamical astron- omy (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002)

    G. Contopoulos, Order and chaos in dynamical astron- omy (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002)

    2002

  3. [3]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics , 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    Barrow-Green, Poincare and the Three Body Problem, History of mathematics (American Mathematical Soci- ety, Providence, 1997)

    J. Barrow-Green, Poincare and the Three Body Problem, History of mathematics (American Mathematical Soci- ety, Providence, 1997)

    1997

  5. [5]

    C. D. Murray and S. F. Dermott, Solar System Dynam- ics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000)

    2000

  6. [6]

    Chaos in the Solar System

    M. Lecar, F. A. Franklin, M. J. Holman, and N. J. Mur- ray, Chaos in the Solar System, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- trophys. 39, 581 (2001), astro-ph/0111600

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Ferraz-Mello, T

    S. Ferraz-Mello, T. A. Michtchenko, C. Beaug´ e, and N. Callegari, Extrasolar Planetary Systems, in Chaos and Stability in Planetary Systems , edited by R. Dvorak, F. Freistetter, and J. Kurths, , Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag Vol. 683, pp. 219–271, 2005

    2005

  8. [8]

    Envelopes for orbits around axially symmetric sources with spheroidal shape

    J. Ramos-Caro and R. S. S. Vieira, Envelopes for orbits around axially symmetric sources with spheroidal shape, New Astron.102, 102041 (2023), 2302.02739

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Henon and C

    M. Henon and C. Heiles, The applicability of the third integral of motion: Some numerical experiments, Astron. J. 69, 73 (1964)

    1964

  2. [10]

    Contopoulos and N

    G. Contopoulos and N. Voglis, Galaxies and ChaosLecture Notes in Physics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Grosbøl, Observing Chaos in Disk Galaxies, in Galax- ies and Chaos , edited by G

    P. Grosbøl, Observing Chaos in Disk Galaxies, in Galax- ies and Chaos , edited by G. Contopoulos and N. Voglis, , Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag Vol. 626, pp. 201–212, 2003

    2003

  4. [12]

    Grosbøl, Observing Chaos in External Spiral Galaxies, Space Sci

    P. Grosbøl, Observing Chaos in External Spiral Galaxies, Space Sci. Rev. 102, 73 (2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    Hunter, Disk-Crossing Orbits, in Galaxies and Chaos , edited by G

    C. Hunter, Disk-Crossing Orbits, in Galaxies and Chaos , edited by G. Contopoulos and N. Voglis, , Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag Vol. 626, pp. 137–153, 2003

    2003

  6. [14]

    Hunter, Chaos in Orbits Due to Disk Crossings, An- nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1045, 120 (2005)

    C. Hunter, Chaos in Orbits Due to Disk Crossings, An- nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1045, 120 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    A. C. Quillen, Chaos Caused by Resonance Overlap in the Solar Neighborhood: Spiral Structure at the Bar’s Outer Lindblad Resonance, Astron. J. 125, 785 (2003), astro-ph/0204040

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Ramos-Caro, F

    J. Ramos-Caro, F. L´ opez-Suspes, and G. A. Gonz´ alez, Chaotic and regular motion around generalized Kalnajs discs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 386, 440 (2008), 0806.4272

    2008 arXiv

  9. [17]

    E. E. Zotos, Are external perturbations responsible for chaotic motion in galaxies?, Chaos Solitons and Fractals 44, 501 (2011), 1204.0218

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Pichardo, M

    B. Pichardo, M. Martos, E. Moreno, and J. Espre- sate, Nonlinear Effects in Models of the Galaxy. I. Mid- plane Stellar Orbits in the Presence of Three-dimensional Spiral Arms, Astrophys. J. 582, 230 (2003), astro- 8 ph/0208136

    2003

  11. [19]

    T. A. Michtchenko, R. S. S. Vieira, D. A. Barros, and J. R. D. L´ epine, Modelling resonances and orbital chaos in disk galaxies. Application to a Milky Way spiral model, Astron. Astrophys. 597, A39 (2017), 1608.08991

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    J. R. D. L´ epine, T. A. Michtchenko, D. A. Barros, and R. S. S. Vieira, The Dynamical Origin of the Local Arm and the Sun’s Trapped Orbit, Astrophys. J. 843, 48 (2017), 1705.04381

    2017 arXiv

  13. [21]

    T. A. Michtchenko, J. R. D. L´ epine, A. P´ erez-Villegas, R. S. S. Vieira, and D. A. Barros, On the Stellar Velocity Distribution in the Solar Neighborhood in Light of Gaia DR2, Astrophys. J. 863, L37 (2018), 1808.01501

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Contopoulos, A third Integral of Motion in a Galaxy, Z

    G. Contopoulos, A third Integral of Motion in a Galaxy, Z. Astrophys. 49, 273 (1960)

    1960

  15. [23]

    Contopoulos, On the existence of a third integral of motion, Astron

    G. Contopoulos, On the existence of a third integral of motion, Astron. J. 68, 1 (1963)

    1963

  16. [24]

    Contopoulos, Applications of the Third Integral in the Galaxy, in Relativity Theory and Astrophysics

    G. Contopoulos, Applications of the Third Integral in the Galaxy, in Relativity Theory and Astrophysics. Vol.2: Galactic Structure, edited by J. Ehlers (American Math- ematical Society, Providence, 1967), pp. 98–115

    1967

  17. [25]

    de Zeeuw, Elliptical galaxies with separable potentials, Mon

    T. de Zeeuw, Elliptical galaxies with separable potentials, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 216, 273 (1985)

    1985

  18. [26]

    de Zeeuw, Integrable Models for Galaxies, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 536, 15 (1988)

    T. de Zeeuw, Integrable Models for Galaxies, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 536, 15 (1988)

    1988

  19. [27]

    Binney and P

    J. Binney and P. McMillan, Models of our Galaxy - II, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 413, 1889 (2011), 1101.0747

    2011 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Binney, Distribution functions for the Milky Way, Mon

    J. Binney, Distribution functions for the Milky Way, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 2318 (2010), 0910.1512

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Binney, More dynamical models of our Galaxy, Mon

    J. Binney, More dynamical models of our Galaxy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 1328 (2012), 1207.4917

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Binney, Actions for axisymmetric potentials, Mon

    J. Binney, Actions for axisymmetric potentials, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 1324 (2012), 1207.4910

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Binney and J

    J. Binney and J. L. Sanders, Dynamical models and Galaxy surveys, in IAU Symposium, edited by S. Feltz- ing, G. Zhao, N. A. Walton, and P. Whitelock, , IAU Symposium Vol. 298, pp. 117–129, 2014, 1309.2790

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Bienaym´ e, A

    O. Bienaym´ e, A. C. Robin, and B. Famaey, Quasi inte- gral of motion for axisymmetric potentials, Astron. As- trophys. 581, A123 (2015), 1508.01682

    2015 arXiv

  25. [33]

    R. S. S. Vieira and J. Ramos-Caro, Integrability of mo- tion around galactic razor-thin disks, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 126, 483 (2016), 1606.06349

    2016 arXiv

  26. [34]

    R. S. S. Vieira and J. Ramos-Caro, A Simple Formula for the Third Integral of Motion of Disk-Crossing Stars in the Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 786, 27 (2014), 1305.7078

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    R. S. S. Vieira and J. Ramos-Caro, Envelopes and verti- cal amplitudes of disc-crossing orbits, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc. 484, 5155 (2019), 1902.00723

    2019 arXiv

  28. [36]

    R. S. S. Vieira, J. Ramos-Caro, and A. Saa, Vertical stability of circular orbits in relativistic razor-thin disks, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104016 (2016), 1610.02369

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    J. D. Barrow, Chaotic behaviour in general relativity, Physics Reports 85, 1 (1982)

    1982

  30. [38]

    D. F. Chernoff and J. D. Barrow, Chaos in the mixmaster universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 134 (1983)

    1983

  31. [39]

    Contopoulos, N

    G. Contopoulos, N. Voglis, and C. Efthymiopoulos, Chaos in Relativity and Cosmology, in Impact of Mod- ern Dynamics in Astronomy , edited by J. Henrard and S. Ferraz-Mello, (Springer Science+Business Media, Dor- drecht, 1999), p. 1

    1999

  32. [40]

    Motter and P

    A. Motter and P. Letelier, Mixmaster chaos, Physics Letters A 285, 127 (2001)

    2001

  33. [41]

    Bombelli and E

    L. Bombelli and E. Calzetta, Chaos around a black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity 9, 2573 (1992)

    1992

  34. [42]

    P. S. Letelier and W. M. Vieira, Chaos in black holes sur- rounded by gravitational waves, Classical and Quantum Gravity 14, 1249 (1997), gr-qc/9706025

    1997 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A. L. Larsen, Chaotic string-capture by black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity 11, 1201 (1994), hep- th/9309086

    1994

  36. [44]

    A. V. Frolov and A. L. Larsen, Chaotic scattering and capture of strings by a black hole, Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, 3717 (1999), gr-qc/9908039

    1999 arXiv

  37. [45]

    P. Basu, D. Das, and A. Ghosh, Integrability lost: Chaotic dynamics of classical strings on a confining holo- graphic background, Physics Letters B 699, 388 (2011), 1103.4101

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Stuchl ´ ık and M

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık and M. Koloˇ s, Acceleration of string loops in the Schwarzschild-de Sitter geometry, Phys. Rev. D 85, 065022 (2012), 1206.5658

    2012 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Stuchl ´ ık and M

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık and M. Koloˇ s, String loops in the field of braneworld spherically symmetric black holes and naked singularities, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 008 (2012), 1309.6879

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Gu´ eron and P

    E. Gu´ eron and P. S. Letelier, Chaotic motion around prolate deformed bodies, Phys. Rev. E63, 035201 (2001), astro-ph/0101164

    2001 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gu´ eron and P

    E. Gu´ eron and P. S. Letelier, Geodesic chaos around quadrupolar deformed centers of attraction, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046611 (2002)

    2002

  42. [50]

    Saa and R

    A. Saa and R. Venegeroles, Chaos around the superpo- sition of a black-hole and a thin disk, Physics Letters A 259, 201 (1999), gr-qc/9906028

    1999 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Wu and H

    X. Wu and H. Zhang, Chaotic Dynamics in a Superposed Weyl Spacetime, Astrophys. J. 652, 1466 (2006)

    2006

  44. [52]

    Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Nonintegrability of the Zipoy- Voorhees metric, Phys

    G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Nonintegrability of the Zipoy- Voorhees metric, Phys. Rev. D 86, 044013 (2012), 1206.0660

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Semer´ ak and P

    O. Semer´ ak and P. Sukov´ a, Free motion around black holes with discs or rings: between integrability and chaos - I, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.404, 545 (2010), 1211.4106

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Semer´ ak and P

    O. Semer´ ak and P. Sukov´ a, Free motion around black holes with discs or rings: between integrability and chaos - II, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 2455 (2012), 1211.4107

    2012 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Sukov´ a and O

    P. Sukov´ a and O. Semer´ ak, Free motion around black holes with discs or rings: between integrability and chaos - III, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 436, 978 (2013), 1308.4306

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Witzany, O

    V. Witzany, O. Semer´ ak, and P. Sukov´ a, Free motion around black holes with discs or rings: between integra- bility and chaos - IV, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 1770 (2015), 1503.09077

    2015 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Polcar, P

    L. Polcar, P. Sukov´ a, and O. Semer´ ak, Free motion around black holes with disks or rings: Between inte- grability and chaos–v, The Astrophysical Journal 877, 16 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    De Falco and W

    V. De Falco and W. Borrelli, Detection of chaos in the general relativistic Poynting-Robertson effect: Kerr equatorial plane, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064014 (2021), 2001.04979

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    De Falco and W

    V. De Falco and W. Borrelli, Timescales of the chaos on- set in the general relativistic Poynting-Robertson effect, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124012 (2021), 2105.00965

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    T. A. Apostolatos, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and G. Con- topoulos, How to Observe a Non-Kerr Spacetime Us- 9 ing Gravitational Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 111101 (2009), 0906.0093

    2009 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Contopoulos, G

    G. Contopoulos, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and T. A. Apostolatos, Orbits in a Non-Kerr Dynamical System, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 21, 2261 (2011), 1108.5057

    2011 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Mukherjee, O

    S. Mukherjee, O. Kop´ aˇ cek, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Resonance crossing of a charged body in a magnetized Kerr background: An analog of extreme mass ratio in- spiral, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064005 (2023), 2206.10302

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Destounis and K

    K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, Slowly-rotating com- pact objects: the nonintegrability of Hartle-Thorne par- ticle geodesics, General Relativity and Gravitation 55, 123 (2023), 2305.18522

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Lukes-Gerakopoulos, T

    G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, T. A. Apostolatos, and G. Con- topoulos, Observable signature of a background deviating from the Kerr metric, Phys. Rev. D 81, 124005 (2010), 1003.3120

    2010 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Zelenka, G

    O. Zelenka, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, V. Witzany, and O. Kop´ aˇ cek, Growth of resonances and chaos for a spin- ning test particle in the Schwarzschild background, Phys. Rev. D 101, 024037 (2020), 1911.00414

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Testing spacetime symmetry through gravitational waves from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064041 (2020), 2009.00028

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. G. Suvorov, and K. D. Kokkotas, Gravitational Wave Glitches in Chaotic Extreme-Mass- Ratio Inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141102 (2021), 2103.05643

    2021 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Destounis and K

    K. Destounis and K. D. Kokkotas, Gravitational-wave glitches: Resonant islands and frequency jumps in nonin- tegrable extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 104, 064023 (2021), 2108.02782

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Destounis, G

    K. Destounis, G. Huez, and K. D. Kokkotas, Geodesics and gravitational waves in chaotic extreme-mass-ratio in- spirals: the curious case of Zipoy-Voorhees black-hole mimickers, General Relativity and Gravitation 55, 71 (2023), 2301.11483

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Destounis, F

    K. Destounis, F. Angeloni, M. Vaglio, and P. Pani, Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals into rotating boson stars: Nonintegrability, chaos, and transient resonances, Phys. Rev. D 108, 084062 (2023), 2305.05691

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Suzuki and K.-I

    S. Suzuki and K.-I. Maeda, Chaos in Schwarzschild spacetime: The motion of a spinning particle, Phys. Rev. D 55, 4848 (1997), gr-qc/9604020

    1997 arXiv

  64. [72]

    R. S. S. Vieira and R. A. Mosna, Homoclinic chaos in the Hamiltonian dynamics of extended test bodies, Chaos Solitons and Fractals 163, 112541 (2022), 2207.01594

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    R. A. Mosna, F. F. Rodrigues, and R. S. S. Vieira, Chaotic dynamics of a spinless axisymmetric extended body around a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024016 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    F. d. F. Rodrigues, R. A. Mosna, and R. S. S. Vieira, Chaotic dynamics of pulsating spheres orbiting black holes, General Relativity and Gravitation 56, 112 (2024), 2409.14667

    2024 arXiv

  67. [75]

    B. W. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie, An introduction to mod- ern astrophysics (Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, US, 2006)

    2006

  68. [76]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Black holes in galaxies: Environmental im- pact on gravitational-wave generation and propagation, Phys. Rev. D 105, L061501 (2022), 2109.00005

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Solutions of the Ein- stein Equations for a Black Hole Surrounded by a Galac- tic Halo, Astrophys. J. 933, 166 (2022), 2202.02205

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Z. Xu, X. Hou, X. Gong, and J. Wang, Black hole space- time in dark matter halo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 038 (2018), 1803.00767

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Nampalliwar et al

    S. Nampalliwar et al. , Modeling the Sgr A* Black Hole Immersed in a Dark Matter Spike, Astrophys. J. 916, 116 (2021), 2103.12439

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Jusufi, Black holes surrounded by Einstein clusters as models of dark matter fluid, European Physical Journal C 83, 103 (2023), 2202.00010

    K. Jusufi, Black holes surrounded by Einstein clusters as models of dark matter fluid, European Physical Journal C 83, 103 (2023), 2202.00010

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Z. Shen, A. Wang, Y. Gong, and S. Yin, Analytical mod- els of supermassive black holes in galaxies surrounded by dark matter halos, Physics Letters B 855, 138797 (2024), 2311.12259

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Datta, Black holes immersed in dark matter: Energy condition and sound speed, Phys

    S. Datta, Black holes immersed in dark matter: Energy condition and sound speed, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104042 (2024), 2312.01277

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    R. G. Daghigh and G. Kunstatter, Effect of dark matter on galactic black hole ringdown waveforms and shadows, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083004 (2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, G. Lambiase, and Z.-W. Long, Black hole surrounded by the pseudo-isothermal dark matter halo, European Physical Journal C 84, 63 (2024), 2308.05544

    2024 arXiv

  77. [85]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996), astro-ph/9508025

    1996 arXiv

  78. [86]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, and S. D. M. White, A Uni- versal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering, As- trophys. J. 490, 493 (1997), astro-ph/9611107

    1997 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Sofue and V

    Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Rotation Curves of Spiral Galax- ies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39, 137 (2001), astro- ph/0010594

    2001

  80. [88]

    Einasto, Dark Matter, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:0901.0632 (2009), 0901.0632

    J. Einasto, Dark Matter, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:0901.0632 (2009), 0901.0632

    2009 arXiv

  81. [89]

    R. H. Sanders, The dark matter problem: a historical per- spective (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2010)

    2010

  82. [90]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Relativity. I. Momentum and Angular Momentum, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A 314, 499 (1970)

    1970

  83. [91]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of Extended Bodies in General Relativity. II. Moments of the Charge-Current Vector, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A319, 509 (1970)

    1970

  84. [92]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. III. Equations of motion, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 227, 59 (1974)

    1974

  85. [93]

    Holmes, Poincar´ e, celestial mechanics, dynamical- systems theory and “chaos”, Physics Reports 193, 137 (1990)

    P. Holmes, Poincar´ e, celestial mechanics, dynamical- systems theory and “chaos”, Physics Reports 193, 137 (1990)

    1990

  86. [94]

    E. R. Coughlin and C. J. Nixon, A simple and accurate prescription for the tidal disruption radius of a star and the peak accretion rate in tidal disruption events, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, L26 (2022), 2209.03982

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Amaro-Seoane et al

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al. , Astrophysics with the Laser In- terferometer Space Antenna, Living Reviews in Relativ- ity 26, 2 (2023), 2203.06016

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Foucart, A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7, 10 46 (2020), 2006.10570

    F. Foucart, A brief overview of black hole-neutron star mergers, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 7, 10 46 (2020), 2006.10570. Appendix A: EQUA TIONS In Dixon’s formalism, the force Fµ up to quadrupolar order is given by Eq. (6). We computed it following the procedure...

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.