Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Berry Phase and Quantum Oscillation from Multi-orbital Coadjoint-orbit Bosonization

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the de Haas-van Alphen phase shift in interacting metals is set by the static anomalous Hall conductance, not the single-particle Berry phase.

desk verdict Strong free-fermion derivation of Berry phase in dHvA; the interacting extension to σ_H is a bold but unproven step-function assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16289 v2 pith:VOXZ2K65 submitted 2024-12-20 cond-mat.str-el hep-th

Mengxing Ye , Yuxuan Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords deHaas-vanAlpheneffectBerryphaseanomalousHallconductancecoadjointorbitbosonizationmultiorbitalFermisurfaceLifshitz-Kosevichformulanon-Fermiliquidorbitalmagnetization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a low-energy field theory for a multi-orbital Fermi surface by bosonizing the single-particle distribution function through coadjoint orbits. Projecting this theory onto a single band in a weak magnetic field makes Berry curvature appear in the phase-space measure, the Moyal product, and the effective dispersion. The central result is that for a generic interacting system the de Haas-van Alphen oscillation of orbital magnetization is phase-shifted by an amount fixed by the static anomalous Hall conductance, $4\pi^2\sigma_H$, replacing the single-particle Berry phase. The paper also delivers a modified Lifshitz-Kosevich formula in which the amplitude carries Berry-curvature and orbital-magnetic-moment corrections through a field-dependent cyclotron frequency.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the zero-mode sector of the bosonized action, $S_{\mathrm{zero}}[p,q]=\int dt[(-A_{\mathrm{FS}}/(2\pi B)-\gamma/(2\pi))\dot q+p\dot q-\bar{\omega}_c p^2/2]$, which describes a particle on a ring threaded by a flux: the coefficient of $\dot q$ is a topological $\theta$-term that survives interactions because it descends from the Hamiltonian-independent Wess-Zumino-Witten term. The same WZW term, together with the Kac-Moody algebra of the density modes, lets the translation-operator braiding be evaluated in both the UV and the IR, matching $\gamma$ to the anomalous Hall conductance via the Streda formula. Berry curvature also enters through the modified phase-space measure $1+B\Omega$, the Moyal product, and the renormalized cyclotron frequency $\bar{\omega}_c$, which is what changes the oscillation amplitudes.

What would settle it

Measure the static anomalous Hall conductance and the de Haas-van Alphen phase shift in the same 2D correlated metal, extracting the phase from the intercept of the oscillations plotted against $1/B$; if the phase differs from $4\pi^2\sigma_H$ beyond the combined experimental uncertainty, Eq. (20) is falsified. A microscopic test would be to compute the WZW term at first nontrivial order in interactions and check whether it acquires a correction not fixed by $A^\pi_{\mathrm{FS}}(B)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is Eq. (20): for a generic interacting 2D metal the oscillatory part of the free energy is $F_{\mathrm{osc}}=\sum_k A_k\cos[k(A^0_{\mathrm{FS}}/B+4\pi^2\sigma_H)]$, so the phase shift in dHvA oscillations exactly matches the static anomalous Hall conductance, $\sigma_H(q\to 0,\omega=0)$. For noninteracting systems this reduces to the familiar Berry-phase shift $\gamma$, and the paper's non-perturbative braiding-algebra argument shows that for Fermi liquids and non-Fermi liquids the same combination $\gamma/(4\pi^2)+\partial_B A_{\mathrm{FS}}/(4\pi^2)$ continues to control both the dHvA phase and the Hall response. The proof runs through the topological Wess-Zumino-Witten term in the bosonized action, which is independent of the Hamiltonian, so only the kinetic-momentum Fermi-surface area and the Kac-Moody braiding algebra are needed.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that in the interacting system the low-energy bosonized action keeps the free-fermion Wess-Zumino-Witten term unchanged, so the dHvA phase is set only by the kinetic-momentum Fermi-surface area; if interactions renormalize that term or the braiding algebra beyond what the Fermi-surface area encodes, the phase-shift relation breaks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Eq. (20) is correct, dHvA experiments in correlated 2D metals can be used to read off the static anomalous Hall conductance from the oscillation phase, without needing a separate transport measurement.
  • The modified Lifshitz-Kosevich formula predicts an amplitude factor $\exp(\lambda_2 T)$ beyond the usual $\exp(-\lambda_1 T/B)$, a signature of Berry-curvature and orbital-moment corrections testable in materials with strong Berry curvature on the Fermi surface.
  • The non-perturbative proof extends the dHvA phase-shift relation to non-Fermi liquids, where quasiparticle Berry phases are not defined, as long as the kinetic-momentum Fermi surface remains well defined.
  • The cubic $\phi^3$ corrections produce a small temperature-dependent phase shift for non-parabolic bands, which the paper connects to observations in 3D metals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, which the paper leaves open, is the 3D version: if the same $\theta$-term logic carries over, dHvA phase shifts in 3D correlated metals would also be tied to the Hall response, with the Fermi-volume area replacing the 2D Fermi-surface area.
  • Because the argument is Hamiltonian-independent, a testable prediction is that the dHvA phase shift and the anomalous Hall conductance should track each other under doping or pressure in the same material, even when the quasiparticle description changes sharply.
  • The amplitude correction $\exp(\lambda_2 T)$ suggests an experimental route to separate Berry-curvature contributions from interaction-induced renormalizations: measure the temperature dependence of dHvA amplitudes at fixed field and look for the sign and magnitude of $\lambda_2$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a coadjoint-orbit bosonization framework for multi-orbital fermionic systems in a weak magnetic field. The authors project the bosonized action onto a single band, and show that Berry curvature enters through the phase-space measure, the Moyal bracket, and the effective dispersion. The zero-mode sector of the theory yields de Haas-van Alphen oscillations with a Berry-phase-induced phase shift and a modified Lifshitz-Kosevich formula. The central new claim is that for interacting systems the dHvA phase shift is determined by the static anomalous Hall conductance, leading to Eq. (20). The supplemental material provides the band-projection details, the anisotropic-Fermi-surface analysis, the Poisson-resummation derivation of the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula, and the braiding-algebra argument connecting the dHvA phase to sigma_H.

Significance. The free-fermion part of the paper is a solid technical contribution: the star-diagonalization band projection, the appearance of Berry curvature in the phase-space measure and Moyal product, the topological theta-term in the zero-mode action, and the resulting modified Lifshitz-Kosevich formula are carefully derived and checkable. The prediction of an additional temperature-dependent factor in the oscillation amplitude, Eq. (16), is falsifiable, and the paper contains no fitted parameters. However, the advertised generalization to interacting systems, encapsulated in Eq. (20), is the most important new claim and currently rests on an unproven step-function replacement for the exact one-body density matrix. If that step can be supplied, the result would be significant: it would replace the single-particle Berry phase by the static anomalous Hall conductance in dHvA and connect two widely studied observables. As written, the interacting claim needs additional support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplement §IV.A, Eq. (S54)] Eq. (S54) writes the WZW term as ∫ f0(π,B) U^{-1} i∂t U and asserts that f0(π,B) equals 0 or 1 on either side of the Fermi surface. For an interacting ground state, f0 is the exact one-body density matrix, which has quasiparticle weight Z < 1 and smooth tails; the O(B^0) coefficient of the resulting theta-term is not shown to reduce to Aπ_FS(B)/2πB. Since this step is the entire basis for extending the dHvA phase shift from Eq. (15) to Eq. (20), the central claim for generic interacting systems is currently an assertion rather than a derivation.
  2. [Supplement §IV.A, Eqs. (S47)–(S52)] The IR braiding calculation uses kF;x,y(θ) and the single-particle Berry connection A(θ), and explicitly invokes kx,y = πx,y ∓ B Ay,x (Eq. (S48)), which is a free-fermion band-projection relation. For a generic interacting system these single-particle objects are not defined, so the evaluation of the braiding algebra in Eqs. (S51)–(S52) cannot be performed as written. The paper needs either a derivation of these IR operators directly from the interacting WZW term or an explicit argument that the same algebra is obtained; otherwise the relation between the dHvA phase and σH is not established beyond free fermions.
  3. [Main text, Eq. (19)] Eq. (19) relies on the Streda formula σH = dν/dB and on the identification ν = A_FS/(2π)^2 in the presence of a magnetic field. The latter Luttinger-type relation is not proved for interacting or non-Fermi-liquid systems; the reference to Ref. [62] concerns static magnetic response of the density, not the in-field Luttinger theorem needed here. If the in-field Luttinger relation fails, the replacement A_FS/B + γ = A0_FS/B + 4π²σH in Eq. (20) would be invalid.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (16)] The quantities λ1 and λ2 in Eq. (16) are not defined in the main text; please define them or refer explicitly to the supplement where they are introduced.
  2. [Main text, after Eq. (5)] The expression A(x) and A(p) is introduced without defining what these quantities are; A(p) is presumably the Berry connection in momentum space, but this should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion with the vector potential A(x).
  3. [Supplement II] There is a typographical error in the first paragraph of Supplement II: 'natrual' should be 'natural'.
  4. [Fig. 1] The figure caption labels the Berry phase but does not indicate how it is visualized in the figure; a sentence clarifying that γ = ∮ A·dk is the Aharonov-Bohm-like phase accumulated along the Fermi surface would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; Eq. (20) is an algebraic combination of derived expressions, and the main gap is an unproven step-function assumption in Supplement §IV.A, which is a correctness risk rather than circularity.

full rationale

After walking the derivation chain, I find no step in which a prediction reduces to its own input by construction. The free-fermion dHvA phase in Eq. (12) and the Lifshitz-Kosevich form in Eq. (15) are derived from the coadjoint-orbit action by expansion, mode decomposition, and Poisson resummation; the Berry-phase shift enters as the coefficient of the topological theta-term, not as an assumed answer. The anomalous-Hall relation Eq. (19) is obtained independently from a UV/IR braiding-algebra matching (Supplement Eqs. (S46)-(S53)) together with the Streda formula; Eq. (20) is then an algebraic substitution of Eq. (19) into Eq. (15). For the interacting extension, Supplement Section IV.A assumes that the WZW term is fixed by a step-function f0(pi,B) and hence only by the kinetic-momentum Fermi-surface area A_pi_FS(B); both the dHvA phase (S55) and the Hall conductance (S56) are read off from this same input, so the claimed match is by construction within that assumption. That is an unproven assumption and a genuine correctness risk, because the exact one-body density matrix is not a sharp step for interacting ground states, and the paper's footnote [63] itself cautions against using the free-fermion filling formula. However, this is not a circular reduction of the sort defined here: the paper does not fit, define, or cite the target relation into the input. The self-citations to the authors' prior work [38] supply technical lemmas such as the phase-space integral to Landau-level sum and the total-derivative origin of dHvA, but those lemmas are parameter-free, do not assume Eq. (20), and are supplemented by independent references [58,59]; they therefore do not constitute load-bearing circularity. No fitted parameters or externally fitted data appear anywhere in the argument. The score of 2 reflects only the reliance on self-cited technical machinery; the central derivation itself is non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is parameter-free with respect to the given band structure, but it rests on several physical approximations (weak field, single band projection, continuum limit) and on the topological robustness of the coadjoint-orbit action for interacting systems. No free parameters are fitted to data, and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The external magnetic field is weak, with B << k_F^2 and B a_0^2 << 1, so that a gradient expansion in B/k_F^2 is valid.
    Used throughout; e.g., after Eq. (4), O(B^2) terms are suppressed by B/k_F^2.
  • domain assumption The system has a single closed Fermi surface, and the Brillouin-zone boundary can be ignored (continuum limit).
    Stated near Eq. (3) in 'Band projection in a weak magnetic field'; the paper restricts to a single FS and later assumes isotropy before generalizing.
  • domain assumption Inter-band (off-diagonal) fluctuations in the star-diagonalized basis are fast-oscillating and can be projected out.
    Supplement Sec. I.A: 'the off-diagonal terms should be fast oscillating for band gap much greater than the EFT cutoff, and will be ignored hereafter.'
  • domain assumption The Moyal product and star-diagonalization remain valid to leading order in B/k_F^2 after band projection.
    Supplement Sec. I notes the validity of the star product in projected coordinates is not proven to all orders in the gradient expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper The Wess-Zumino-Witten term is Hamiltonian-independent and robust against interactions, so the phase shift for interacting systems is fixed by the Fermi-surface area in kinetic-momentum coordinates.
    Supplement Sec. IV.A: 'being a first-order time-derivative, this term does not depend on the Hamiltonian, and is thus robust against interaction effects.' This is the key assumption for the interacting generalization.
  • domain assumption The Luttinger theorem and the Streda formula sigma_H = d nu/dB hold for the interacting systems considered.
    Used in Eq. (19) to relate the B-dependence of the Fermi-surface area to the static anomalous Hall conductance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Berry Phase and Quantum Oscillation from Multi-orbital Coadjoint-orbit Bosonization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOXZ2K65

@misc{pith2026241216289,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Berry Phase and Quantum Oscillation from Multi-orbital Coadjoint-orbit Bosonization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOXZ2K65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16289}
}
read the original abstract

We develop an effective field theory for a multi-orbital fermionic system using the method of coadjoint orbits for higher-dimensional bosonization. The dynamical bosonic fields are single-particle distribution functions defined on the phase space. We show that when projecting to a single band, Berry curvature effects naturally emerge. In particular, we consider the de Haas-van Alphen effect of a 2d Fermi surface, and show that the oscillation of orbital magnetization in an external field is offset by the Berry phase accumulated by the cyclotron around the Fermi surface. Beyond previously known results, we show that this phase shift holds even for interacting systems, in which the single-particle Berry phase is replaced by the static anomalous Hall conductance. Furthermore, we obtain the correction to the amplitudes of de Haas-van Alphen oscillations due to Berry curvature effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16289 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the FS from a multi-orbital system, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bosonized theory of de Haas-van Alphen quantum oscillation in Fermi liquids

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For a 2D Fermi liquid, the de Haas-van Alphen amplitudes are derived from the zero-mode sector of a coadjoint-orbit bosonized action, yielding LK-like low-T behavior and a second harmonic A2 that changes sign at high T.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [38]

    Ye and Y

    M. Ye and Y. Wang, Coadjoint-orbit effective field the- ory of a fermi surface in a weak magnetic field (2024), arXiv:2408.06409 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [62]

    Chen, Static magnetic response of non-fermi-liquid density, Phys

    J.-Y. Chen, Static magnetic response of non-fermi-liquid density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 096601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [1]

    Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in Metals , Cam- bridge Monographs on Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

    D. Shoenberg, Magnetic Oscillations in Metals , Cam- bridge Monographs on Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1984)

    work page 1984

  4. [2]

    G. P. Mikitik and Y. V. Sharlai, Manifestation of berry’s phase in metal physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2147 (1999)

    1999

  5. [3]

    G. P. Mikitik and Y. V. Sharlai, Berry phase and de haas–van alphen effect in larhin 5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 106403 (2004)

    2004

  6. [4]

    I. A. Luk’yanchuk and Y. Kopelevich, Phase analysis of quantum oscillations in graphite, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 166402 (2004)

    2004

  7. [5]

    Zhang, Y.-W

    Y. Zhang, Y.-W. Tan, H. L. Stormer, and P. Kim, Ex- perimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene, Nature 438, 201 (2005)

    2005

  8. [6]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry curvature, orbital mo- ment, and effective quantum theory of electrons in elec- tromagnetic fields, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 20, 193202 (2008)

    2008

Show all 69 references
  1. [7]

    VanGennep, S

    D. VanGennep, S. Maiti, D. Graf, S. W. Tozer, C. Mar- tin, H. Berger, D. L. Maslov, and J. J. Hamlin, Pres- sure tuning the fermi level through the dirac point of gi- ant rashba semiconductor bitei, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter 26, 342202 (2014)

    2014

  2. [8]

    Murakawa, M

    H. Murakawa, M. S. Bahramy, M. Tokunaga, Y. Ko- hama, C. Bell, Y. Kaneko, N. Nagaosa, H. Y. Hwang, and Y. Tokura, Detection of berry’s phase in a bulk rashba semiconductor, Science 342, 1490 (2013), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1242247

    2013 doi

  3. [9]

    Pariari, P

    A. Pariari, P. Dutta, and P. Mandal, Probing the fermi surface of three-dimensional dirac semimetal cd3as2 through the de haas–van alphen technique, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155139 (2015)

    2015

  4. [10]

    F. Wu, C. Guo, M. Smidman, J. Zhang, Y. Chen, J. Sin- gleton, and H. Yuan, Anomalous quantum oscillations and evidence for a non-trivial berry phase in smsb, npj Quantum Materials 4, 20 (2019)

    2019

  5. [11]

    L. Ye, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, M. Kang, J. Liu, T. Suzuki, R. Comin, L. Fu, and J. G. Checkelsky, de haas-van alphen effect of correlated dirac states in kagome metal fe3sn2, Nature communications 10, 4870 (2019)

    2019

  6. [12]

    Alexandradinata, C

    A. Alexandradinata, C. Wang, W. Duan, and L. Glaz- man, Revealing the topology of fermi-surface wave func- tions from magnetic quantum oscillations, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011027 (2018)

    2018

  7. [13]

    C. Wang, W. Duan, L. Glazman, and A. Alexandrad- inata, Landau quantization of nearly degenerate bands and full symmetry classification of landau level crossings, Phys. Rev. B 100, 014442 (2019)

    2019

  8. [14]

    Alexandradinata and L

    A. Alexandradinata and L. Glazman, Fermiology of topo- logical metals, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 14, 261 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Shrestha, R

    K. Shrestha, R. Chapai, B. K. Pokharel, D. Miertschin, T. Nguyen, X. Zhou, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, J. F. Mitchell, U. Welp, D. Popovi´ c, D. E. Graf, B. Lorenz, and W. K. Kwok, Nontrivial fermi surface topology of the kagome superconductor csv 3sb5 probed by de haas–van...

    2022

  10. [16]

    Chapai, M

    R. Chapai, M. Leroux, V. Oliviero, D. Vignolles, 6 N. Bruyant, M. P. Smylie, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, W.-K. Kwok, J. F. Mitchell, and U. Welp, Magnetic breakdown and topology in the kagome super- conductor csv3sb5 under high magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126401 (2023)

    2023

  11. [17]

    Y. Li, H. Tan, and B. Yan, Quantum oscillations with topological phases in a kagome metal csti 3bi5 (2023), arXiv:2307.04750 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [18]

    J. M. Luttinger, The effect of a magnetic field on elec- trons in a periodic potential, Phys. Rev. 84, 814 (1951)

    1951

  13. [19]

    Lifshitz and A

    I. Lifshitz and A. Kosevich, Theory of magnetic suscep- tibility in metals at low temperatures, Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 636 (1956)

    1956

  14. [20]

    L. Onsager, Interpretation of the de haas-van alphen ef- fect, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophi- cal Magazine and Journal of Science 43, 1006 (1952), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440908521019

    1952 doi

  15. [21]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the hofstadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in mag- netic bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B 53, 7010 (1996)

    1996

  16. [22]

    J. M. Luttinger, Theory of the de haas-van alphen effect for a system of interacting fermions, Phys. Rev.121, 1251 (1961)

    1961

  17. [23]

    Roth, Theory of bloch electrons in a magnetic field, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 23, 433 (1962)

    L. Roth, Theory of bloch electrons in a magnetic field, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 23, 433 (1962)

    1962

  18. [24]

    L. M. Roth, Semiclassical theory of magnetic energy lev- els and magnetic susceptibility of bloch electrons, Physi- cal Review 145, 434 (1966)

    1966

  19. [25]

    D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 137204 (2005)

    2005

  20. [26]

    G. W. Martin, D. L. Maslov, and M. Y. Reizer, Quantum magneto-oscillations in a two-dimensional fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 68, 241309 (2003)

    2003

  21. [27]

    P. A. Nosov, Y.-M. Wu, and S. Raghu, Entropy and de haas–van alphen oscillations of a three-dimensional marginal fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075107 (2024)

    2024

  22. [28]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Luttinger’s theorem and bosoniza- tion of the fermi surface 10.48550/ARXIV.COND- MAT/0505529 (2005)

    2005 doi

  23. [29]

    A. H. Castro Neto and E. Fradkin, Bosonization of fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 49, 10877 (1994)

    1994

  24. [30]

    A. H. Castro Neto and E. Fradkin, Bosonization of the low energy excitations of fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1393 (1994)

    1994

  25. [31]

    D. V. Khveshchenko, Geometrical approach to bosoniza- tion ofd> 1 dimensional (non)-fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 52, 4833 (1995)

    1995

  26. [32]

    Houghton, H.-J

    A. Houghton, H.-J. Kwon, and J. B. Marston, Multi- dimensional bosonization, Advances in Physics 49, 141 (2000)

    2000

  27. [33]

    L. V. Delacr´ etaz, Y.-H. Du, U. Mehta, and D. T. Son, Nonlinear bosonization of fermi surfaces: The method of coadjoint orbits, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033131 (2022)

    2022

  28. [34]

    S. Han, F. Desrochers, and Y. B. Kim, Bosonization of non-fermi liquids (2023), arXiv:2306.14955 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023

  29. [35]

    Park and L

    T. Park and L. Balents, An exact method for bosonizing the Fermi surface in arbitrary dimensions, SciPost Phys. 16, 069 (2024)

    2024

  30. [36]

    D. V. Khveshchenko, (pre-)modern (non-)fermi liquids (2024), arXiv:2409.02316 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Ravid, Electrons lost in phase space (2024), arXiv:2412.00924 [cond-mat.str-el]

    T. Ravid, Electrons lost in phase space (2024), arXiv:2412.00924 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Huang, Effective field theory of berry fermi liquid from the coadjoint orbit method, Phys

    X. Huang, Effective field theory of berry fermi liquid from the coadjoint orbit method, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235146 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Ray and B

    R. Ray and B. Sakita, Bulk and edge excitations of a ν = 1 hall ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035320 (2001)

    2001

  34. [41]

    Mehta, Perturbative non-fermi liquids from nonlinear bosonization (2024)

    U. Mehta, Perturbative non-fermi liquids from nonlinear bosonization (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Mehta, Postmodern Fermi Liquids, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2307.02536 (2023), arXiv:2307.02536 [cond- mat.str-el]

    U. Mehta, Postmodern Fermi Liquids, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2307.02536 (2023), arXiv:2307.02536 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Delacretaz, Nonlinear bosonization of fermi liquids (2024), talk at the University of Florida

    L. Delacretaz, Nonlinear bosonization of fermi liquids (2024), talk at the University of Florida

    2024

  37. [44]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  38. [45]

    Wickles and W

    C. Wickles and W. Belzig, Effective quantum theories for bloch dynamics in inhomogeneous systems with nontriv- ial band structure, Physical Review B 88, 10.1103/phys- revb.88.045308 (2013)

    2013 doi

  39. [46]

    C. H. Wong and Y. Tserkovnyak, Quantum kinetic equa- tion in phase-space textured multiband systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115209 (2011)

    2011

  40. [47]

    Mangeolle, L

    L. Mangeolle, L. Savary, and L. Balents, Quantum kinetic equation and thermal conductivity tensor for bosons, Phys. Rev. B 109, 235137 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    See supplemental material for details on (i) the band pro- jection procedure for a generic hamiltonian ˆh(x,p) (ii) the analysis for anistropic fs’s, (iii) the derivation of the modified lifshitz-kosevich formula from bosonization, and (iv) the relation between γ and anomalous...

  42. [49]

    E. I. Blount, Bloch electrons in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. 126, 1636 (1962)

    1962

  43. [50]

    Shindou and L

    R. Shindou and L. Balents, Artificial electric field in fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 216601 (2006)

    2006

  44. [51]

    Shindou and L

    R. Shindou and L. Balents, Gradient expansion approach to multiple-band fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 77, 035110 (2008)

    2008

  45. [52]

    Floreanini and R

    R. Floreanini and R. Jackiw, Self-dual fields as charge- density solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1873 (1987)

    1987

  46. [53]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons, Condensed Matter Field Theory, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  47. [54]

    E. W. Weisstein, Jacobi theta functions, https:// mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html (2000)

    2000

  48. [55]

    C. Guo, A. Alexandradinata, C. Putzke, A. Estry, T. Tu, N. Kumar, F.-R. Fan, S. Zhang, Q. Wu, O. V. Yazyev, K. R. Shirer, M. D. Bachmann, H. Peng, E. D. Bauer, F. Ronning, Y. Sun, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, and P. J. W. Moll, Temperature dependence of quantum oscillations from non...

    2021

  49. [56]

    J. M. Luttinger, Fermi surface and some simple equilib- rium properties of a system of interacting fermions, Phys. Rev. 119, 1153 (1960)

    1960

  50. [57]

    Oshikawa, Topological approach to luttinger’s theo- rem and the fermi surface of a kondo lattice, Phys

    M. Oshikawa, Topological approach to luttinger’s theo- rem and the fermi surface of a kondo lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3370 (2000)

    2000

  51. [58]

    D. V. Else, R. Thorngren, and T. Senthil, Non-fermi liq- uids as ersatz fermi liquids: General constraints on com- 7 pressible metals, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021005 (2021)

    2021

  52. [59]

    D. G. Barci, E. Fradkin, and L. Ribeiro, Bosonization of fermi liquids in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155146 (2018)

    2018

  53. [60]

    Auerbach, Equilibrium formulae for transverse mag- netotransport of strongly correlated metals, Physical Re- view B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.115115 (2019)

    A. Auerbach, Equilibrium formulae for transverse mag- netotransport of strongly correlated metals, Physical Re- view B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.115115 (2019)

    2019 doi

  54. [61]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect as a topological fermi-liquid prop- erty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  55. [63]

    A priori one cannot use ν = ∫ f0(p)dp/4π2 except for free fermions

  56. [64]

    T. L. Hughes and Y. Wang, Gapless fermionic systems as phase-space topological insulators: Non-perturbative results from anomalies (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    E. I. Kiselev and J. Schmalian, Nonlocal hydrodynamic transport and collective excitations in dirac fluids, Phys. Rev. B 102, 245434 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Ye and Y

    M. Ye and Y. Wang, Unpublished

  59. [67]

    Chen and D

    J.-Y. Chen and D. T. Son, Berry fermi liquid theory, Annals of Physics 377, 345–386 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    Wickles and W

    C. Wickles and W. Belzig, Effective quantum theories for bloch dynamics in inhomogeneous systems with nontriv- ial band structure, Phys. Rev. B 88, 045308 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    Berry Phase and Quantum Oscillation from Multi-orbital Coadjoint-orbit Bosonization

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010). Supplemental Material to “Berry Phase and Quantum Oscillation from Multi-orbital Coadjoint-orbit Bosonization” Mengxing Ye 1,∗ and Yuxuan Wang 2,† 1Department of Ph...

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.