Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Discovery of Known Software Vulnerability For Enhanced Cybersecurity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.16607 v1 pith:65D2SKX4 submitted 2024-12-21 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords softwarevulnerabilitydetectionprocessvulnerableaccuratefuzzyidentify
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Software vulnerabilities are commonly exploited as attack vectors in cyberattacks. Hence, it is crucial to identify vulnerable software configurations early to apply preventive measures. Effective vulnerability detection relies on identifying software vulnerabilities through standardized identifiers such as Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) strings. However, non-standardized CPE strings issued by software vendors create a significant challenge. Inconsistent formats, naming conventions, and versioning practices lead to mismatches when querying databases like the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), hindering accurate vulnerability detection. Failure to properly identify and prioritize vulnerable software complicates the patching process and causes delays in updating the vulnerable software, thereby giving attackers a window of opportunity. To address this, we present a method to enhance CPE string consistency by implementing a multi-layered sanitization process combined with a fuzzy matching algorithm on data collected using Osquery. Our method includes a union query with priority weighting, which assigns relevance to various attribute combinations, followed by a fuzzy matching process with threshold-based similarity scoring, yielding higher confidence in accurate matches. Comparative analysis with open-source tools such as FleetDM demonstrates that our approach improves detection accuracy by 40%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking LLM-Assisted Blue Teaming via Standardized Threat Hunting

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standardized modular threat-hunting workflows (CyberTeam) improve LLM performance on blue team tasks compared to open-ended ICL, CoT, and ToT prompting across 30 tasks and 452k samples.

Pith tools