Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 98 references

New modeling for hybrid stars with an elastic quark core

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a nonlinearly elastic quark core, modeled with the quasi-Hookean equation of state, raises the maximum mass of hybrid stars by several percent and can push turning-point-stable compactness above 1/3, making such…

desk verdict Solid new elastic-HS modeling, but the abstract's stable-compactness>1/3 claim outruns the stability analysis. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16636 v2 pith:2DSG6CGK submitted 2024-12-21 gr-qc

Zoey Zhiyuan Dong , Shu Yan Lau , Kent Yagi This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords hybridstarselasticquarkcorequasi-Hookeanequationofstatepressureanisotropymaximummasscompactnessblackholemimickersrelativisticelasticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens to the static structure of a hybrid star when its quark core is treated as a real elastic solid, not a perfect fluid. It finds that the shear stress the core supports under its own gravity makes the pressure anisotropic, with tangential pressure exceeding radial pressure, and this extra support raises the maximum mass by several percent (1.8% to 5.2% in the four main models). Some previously disfavored soft equations of state then satisfy the observed mass of PSR J0740+6620, and the stable branch can reach compactness above 1/3, which would make these objects potential black hole mimickers. The paper also proposes a new fitted formula for the pressure-anisotropy profile that matches the elastic-core calculation to within 10%, because standard phenomenological anisotropy models fail to capture it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quasi-Hookean equation of state for a relativistic solid, $\rho = \tilde{\rho} + \tilde{\mu} S^2$, together with the structural equations obtained from the general relativistic elasticity formalism. The shear scalar $S^2 = (1/6)(z^{-1} - z)^2$ is controlled by $z = n_r/n_t$, the ratio of radial to tangential linear particle density; the shear modulus is taken as $\tilde{\mu} = \kappa \sqrt{\tilde{\rho}}$ with $\kappa$ set by crystalline color-superconducting estimates. The anisotropy follows as $\sigma = -(\tilde{\mu}/2)(z^{-2} - z^2)$, and the central equations integrate for the mass $m$, the unsheared pressure $\tilde{p}$, and $z$, with a junction condition at the quark–nuclear interface. This machinery converts the microscopic rigidity of the core into macroscopic changes in mass, radius, and compactness, and it generates the numerical anisotropy profiles that the new fitting formula reproduces.

What would settle it

Compute the fundamental radial oscillation eigenfrequency for the maximum-mass elastic hybrid star with $\kappa = 7 \times 10^{26} \, \mathrm{cm}^{1/2} \, \mathrm{g}^{1/2} \, \mathrm{s}^{-2}$ in the quasi-Hookean model; if the mode is unstable at or before the turning point, or if a nonlinear evolution drives the ultra-compact configuration to collapse or shed its photon sphere, the claim that these stars are stable black hole mimickers would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that relaxing the usual assumption of an unsheared background changes hybrid star structure in a specific, calculable way. In the fully relativistic elasticity framework used here, the quasi-Hookean quark core develops a shear strain characterized by $z = n_r/n_t < 1$, so the tangential pressure exceeds the radial pressure throughout the core. That anisotropy supplies extra pressure support: the maximum mass rises monotonically with the shear-modulus coefficient $\kappa$, and the compactness at the maximum-mass configuration increases by up to about 5.8%. For some equation-of-state parameters the stable, turning-point branch crosses compactness 1/3 before the maximum mass, so these elastic hybrid stars would be horizonless objects with a photon sphere, i.e., black hole mimickers. The paper explicitly flags that this last conclusion depends on the turning point signaling radial instability, which is not guaranteed for stars with a sharp phase transition.

Load-bearing premise

The black-hole-mimicker claim rests on assuming that the turning point of the mass-radius curve marks the onset of radial instability for hybrid stars with a sharp density discontinuity, an assumption the paper itself notes may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Some soft equations of state that fail the PSR J0740+6620 mass constraint in fluid models can pass it once elasticity is included.
  • The maximum mass and the compactness of hybrid stars increase monotonically with the shear-modulus coefficient, so stiffer solid cores make heavier, more compact stars.
  • Turning-point-stable configurations with compactness above 1/3 exist in this model, placing elastic hybrid stars among candidate black hole mimickers.
  • The new anisotropy fit gives a 10%-accurate phenomenological bridge between microphysical elastic equations of state and parametrized anisotropic-star models, usable for future tidal and oscillation studies.
  • Current mass–radius observations cannot distinguish an elastic quark core from a fluid one, because the elastic effects concentrate near the maximum mass.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: if the elastic core changes the high-mass structure this much, the tidal deformability and related universal relations of hybrid stars should shift by comparable percentages, so gravitational-wave measurements of high-mass binaries could indirectly test the solid-core hypothesis.
  • The black-hole-mimicker conclusion is more fragile than the mass enhancement: it inherits the turning-point stability assumption, and the paper's own light-ring discussion suggests nonlinear instabilities may destroy these ultra-compact configurations even if linear radial stability holds.
  • The 10% fitting formula could be tested against microscopic calculations of the crystalline color-superconducting shear modulus at lower densities, where the $\kappa \sqrt{\rho}$ scaling is known to overestimate rigidity.
  • A targeted observation of a high-mass pulsar near 2.1 to 2.3 solar masses with a precise radius could decide between elastic and fluid cores, since the elastic models are stiffer precisely in that regime.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper models static, spherically symmetric hybrid stars whose quark core is treated as a nonlinearly elastic solid described by the quasi-Hookean equation of state of Karlovini and Samuelsson, with a CSS-type unsheared EOS and an APR fluid envelope. The authors find that the background shear (nonzero even in spherical symmetry) induces tangential pressure exceeding radial pressure, increasing the maximum mass by a few percent and enhancing compactness. They further show that standard phenomenological anisotropy models (Bowers-Liang and Horvat et al.) fail to reproduce the numerically obtained anisotropy profile, and they propose a new parametrized anisotropy fitting formula claimed to be accurate to about 10%. The paper also discusses causality constraints, junction conditions at the hadron-quark interface, and revisits a discrepancy with Karlovini and Samuelsson on the sign of the elastic maximum-mass effect.

Significance. If the central claims are established, the paper provides a useful bridge between relativistic elasticity theory and the phenomenological anisotropic-star literature, and it identifies a potentially observable effect of a crystalline quark core on the M-R relation. The numerical work has genuine strengths: the structural equations are solved with two independent codes, and the consistency between the elasticity equations and the anisotropic TOV equations is checked to about 1e-6; a Mathematica notebook and fitting code are made publicly available. However, the most striking advertised result, that stably supported elastic hybrid stars can exceed compactness 1/3 and serve as black hole mimickers, is not actually established by the calculations, because the stability boundary is identified with the turning point of the M-R relation even though the paper itself concedes that this criterion may fail for stars with a density discontinuity. The proposed anisotropy model is also fitted and evaluated on the same numerical data, so its 10% accuracy is in-sample. These issues materially weaken the headline claims, though the maximum-mass enhancement by several percent appears more robust.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.B, Fig. 7; abstract; conclusion] The claim that "the compactness of stable stars can exceed 1/3" is not supported by the analysis. Figure 7 labels the portion of each M-R curve before the turning point as the "stable branch," and the abstract and Section III.B use this to infer stable ultra-compact configurations. However, as Footnote 10 and the Conclusion state, the turning-point stability criterion need not apply to stars with a sharp hadron-quark discontinuity, and the number of unstable radial modes can change independently of a turning point depending on the phase-conversion timescale. Since no radial perturbation calculation is performed for these elastic hybrid stars, the compactness-exceeding-1/3 claim and the black-hole-mimicker interpretation are unverified. The paper should either compute the radial mode spectrum (e.g., using the Karlovini-Samuelsson-Zarroug formalism) or explicitly remove the word "stable" and the black-hole-mimicker inference from the abstract and Section III.B.
  2. [Appendix D and §III.B] The qualitative disagreement with Karlovini and Samuelsson (2003) is a load-bearing unresolved issue. The paper reports the opposite trend for the maximum mass as a function of the shear parameter k and merely states that the increasing trend is consistent with earlier studies of anisotropic stars with pt > pr. Since the entire construction is based on Equations (14)-(16) from that reference, an unexplained sign discrepancy in a benchmark case leaves open the possibility of an error in the equations, boundary conditions, or the junction condition. The 1e-6 consistency check between the structural equations and the anisotropic TOV equations is valuable but only checks internal consistency of the present implementation, not correctness against an independent source. The authors should identify the specific source of the difference, such as a sign convention for σ, a different junction condition, or a different stability criterion, or provide a more detailed comparison with the Karlovini-Samuelsson calculation.
  3. [§IV, Eqs. (25)-(26), Fig. 8] The claimed 10% accuracy of the new parametrized anisotropy model is an in-sample result and is therefore overstated. The fitting function in Eqs. (25)-(26) is calibrated on the same numerical solutions whose fractional residuals are plotted in Fig. 8; there is no out-of-sample test at parameter values excluded from the fit or a comparison with an independent family of elastic EOSs. With the many coefficients in Tables II and III (four polynomial degrees in both pc and κ plus inverse powers), the fit has enough flexibility that 10% agreement on training data is not strong evidence that the model "can accurately capture physically-motivated profiles across a wide parameter space." A holdout test, a cross-validation statement, or a more explicit statement that the error is a training-set fitting error would be needed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section V vs. Section III.B] The conclusion states that "the maximum mass increases by around 10%," but Section III.B reports maximum-mass increases of 5.242%, 3.263%, 4.648%, and 1.844% for HS-A through HS-D at the largest κ. Please reconcile these numbers; the abstract's "several percent" is consistent with the latter, but the conclusion is not.
  2. [Fig. 2] The bottom panel of Fig. 2 is difficult to read because the fractional-difference axis uses a very wide logarithmic range and the H and BL model curves cross the numerical curve in multiple places; labeling the vertical axis more clearly or using a more conventional relative-error scale would help.
  3. [Section IV] The sentence "The model is derived by fitting the numerical anisotropy profiles" should be moved earlier in the section so that the reader immediately understands that Eq. (1) is a fitting formula and not a physics-based EOS; the current wording in the Introduction could be misread as implying a first-principles derivation.
  4. [Appendix C] The junction-condition discussion is clear but would benefit from a sentence stating explicitly which of the two cases (zero surface energy vs. thin shell) is used for the main results of Section III, since only the zero-surface-energy case is actually adopted in the body of the paper.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; only a mild self-referential validation of the fitted anisotropy model, while the central stellar-structure calculation is independently solved and cross-checked.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, Eq. (1), Fig. 8; also Abstract]
    "The model is derived by fitting the numerical anisotropy profiles in Sec. III, obtained with the quasi-Hookean EOS that guarantees the σ to vanish at r = 0. ... Figure 8 presents the fractional differences between numerical results and our parameterized model of the anisotropy for different HS models. We observe that the error is maintained below 10%. This indicates that our new analytical form of σ is valid across a broad parameter space."

    The anisotropy model (Eq. 1) and its two-stage coefficient fits (Eqs. 25-26) are calibrated to the same numerical σ(r) profiles that Fig. 8 then uses to report the <10% fractional error. The quoted accuracy is therefore a training-set residual, not an independent test of the model's predictive power; 'valid across a broad parameter space' is asserted from in-sample interpolation rather than from a held-out validation set. This is a secondary claim: the main maximum-mass and compactness results are obtained by independently integrating the relativistic structure equations and are verified with two numerical codes, so they do not inherit this circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation — solving the static, spherically symmetric relativistic elasticity equations with the quasi-Hookean EOS and computing mass-radius relations, maximum masses, and compactness — is self-contained. It relies on an externally established formalism (Karlovini & Samuelsson 2003), and the authors even resolve the discrepancy with that reference and cross-check their integration against the anisotropic TOV equations with two codes. The compactness/black-hole-mimicker claim is conditional on the turning-point stability criterion, and the paper explicitly flags in footnote 10 and the conclusion that this criterion may not apply to stars with a density discontinuity; that is an acknowledged limitation rather than a circular step. The only self-referential element is the new phenomenological anisotropy fit: its parameters are fit to the same numerical profiles on which the claimed 10% accuracy is measured, so the accuracy is in-sample. This affects a secondary modeling claim, not the main structural results, and the paper is honest that the model is 'derived by fitting.' Accordingly, the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's predictions rest on modeling choices imported from the literature: the quasi-Hookean elastic EOS and shear scalar, the shear modulus scaling with energy density, and the CSS template for quark matter. The numerical results also rely on assumed junction conditions and, for the ultra-compact claim, on a stability criterion that the authors themselves flag as questionable for hybrid stars.

free parameters (4)
  • Shear modulus coefficient kappa = 2.8e25 to 7e26 cm^(1/2) g^(1/2) s^-2
    Chosen from crystalline color superconductor gap estimates; not fit to observations, but it controls the magnitude of the central effect.
  • CSS EOS parameters (ptrans, v~^2, Delta-rho~) for HS-A through HS-D = See Table I
    Chosen by hand to satisfy current constraints; the results depend on these choices.
  • Anisotropy fitting coefficients b_j and c_l in Eqs. (25)-(26) = Tables II and III (45 coefficients per target parameter)
    Fit to the numerical anisotropy profiles; they define the new phenomenological model and its claimed 10% accuracy.
  • lambda_H and lambda_BL comparison fits = lambda_H = -0.315108, lambda_BL = -0.803287
    Fit to match the numerical profile in Fig. 2; used only for the comparison, not for the central result.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math General relativity and the TOV equations for a static, spherically symmetric spacetime (Eqs. (8)-(12)).
    Background framework, used throughout.
  • domain assumption Quasi-Hookean EOS with shear scalar S^2 from Eq. (3), i.e., rho = rho~ + mu~ S^2.
    Imported from Karlovini and Samuelsson (2003); the central result depends on this material model being applicable to quark matter.
  • domain assumption Shear modulus scaling mu~ = kappa sqrt(rho~) with constant kappa.
    Motivated by the ultrarelativistic free Fermi gas limit of the crystalline color superconducting phase; can overestimate rigidity at low density, as the authors note.
  • domain assumption CSS template with a sharp first-order phase transition and the junction condition Eq. (24) requiring continuity of radial pressure.
    Quark-hadron interface model; different phase conversion physics would change the matching and could introduce surface degrees of freedom.
  • ad hoc to paper Turning point of the M-R curve marks the stability boundary even for hybrid stars with a density discontinuity.
    Used in Fig. 7 to label stars as stable; the authors note this may not hold for stars with a sharp phase transition (footnote 10).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New modeling for hybrid stars with an elastic quark core." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2DSG6CGK

@misc{pith2026241216636,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New modeling for hybrid stars with an elastic quark core},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2DSG6CGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16636}
}
read the original abstract

Heavy neutron stars may contain solid quark cores as motivated by, e.g. the crystalline color superconducting phase, forming elastic hybrid stars (HSs). Many previous studies assumed an elastic core to be unsheared for the background, static and spherically symmetric configuration, and introduced shear deformation only at a perturbative level. This study relaxes this assumption and explores the influence of non-linear elasticity on the static, spherically symmetric structure of elastic HSs within a fully relativistic elasticity framework. Such a framework effectively introduces anisotropic pressure within the quark matter core due to elasticity. The quark core is modeled using a quasi-Hookean equation of state (EOS) with shear contributions, while the nuclear matter envelope is treated as a perfect fluid. We find that including elasticity increases the maximum mass of HSs by several percent. This enhancement allows some soft EOSs to satisfy current observational constraints. However, since the effects of elasticity are primarily concentrated in the high-mass regime, the current observational constraints are insufficient to distinguish whether an elastic anisotropic quark core exists within these stars. Additionally, we show that the compactness of stable stars can exceed the critical value of 1/3 due to the inclusion of elasticity, making them potential candidates for black hole mimickers. Furthermore, we found that common phenomenological models fail to describe the anisotropy of the elastic core and propose a new parametrized anisotropy model that can accurately capture physically-motivated profiles with an error of 10% across a wide parameter space. This work not only bridges the gap between elastic EOSs and parametrized anisotropic models but also provides a foundation for applications such as studying nonradial perturbations, tidal deformability, and pulsation modes for elastic HSs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16636 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Mass-radius relations for HS models constructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The EOSs for NSs and HSs with various EOS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. The anisotropy profile for elastic HS models (HS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The radial profile of the shear scalar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The radial profile of the contribution of the shear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The relation between compactness and central pres [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Fractional difference between numerical results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The principal speeds in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The upper bound of ˜v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Fractional difference in mass between the solu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Observe that the presence of an elastic core can increase the maximum mass of HSs

    Figure 1 presents the mass-radius relation for elas- tic HSs for various shear modulus coefficientsκ that is defined as the ratio between the shear modulus ˜µ and the square root of the energy density. Observe that the presence of an elastic core can increase the maximum mass of HSs. However, it remains insuf- ficient to distinguish whether HSs possess an...

  2. [2]

    Observe that common models like the ones proposed by Bowers and Liang (BL model) [49] and Horvat et al

    Figure 2 compares the pressure anisotropy profile for the core of an elastic HS, obtained numerically, against various phenomenological anisotropy mod- els. Observe that common models like the ones proposed by Bowers and Liang (BL model) [49] and Horvat et al. (H model) [54] fail to accurately capture the numerical data from a physically-motivated elastic...

  3. [3]

    Gittins, N

    F. Gittins, N. Andersson, and J. P. Pereira, Tidal defor- mations of neutron stars with elastic crusts, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103025 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    (23) All variables with the subscript c represent values at the center

    The initial conditions at this point are as follows [24]: m = 4 3 πρcr3 + O(r4), (21) ˜p = pc − 2π ˜βc (ρc + pc) (ρc + 3pc) − 4˜µcρc 3 ˜βc + 4 3 ˜µc r2 + O(r3), (22) z = 1 − 4π (ρc + pc) (ρc + 3pc) + 3˜βcρc 15 ˜βc + 4 3 ˜µc r2 + O(r3). (23) All variables with the subscript c represent values at the center. The stellar surface is determined by the conditio...

  5. [5]

    The result is given as follows, where Y symbolizes −λ or −N : ln(Y) = 4X i=0 ai[ln(¯pc)]i

    For a specific HS model with a fixed κ, fit the functional forms of λ and N using various ¯pc = pc/(1 dyn cm −2). The result is given as follows, where Y symbolizes −λ or −N : ln(Y) = 4X i=0 ai[ln(¯pc)]i. (25) Here, each coefficient ai is a fitting parameter but is also a function of κ

  6. [6]

    Note that ¯ κ is defined as a dimen- sionless quantity, ¯κ = κ/(1026 cm1/2 g1/2 s−2)

    Fit the coefficients ai (i = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) with the cor- responding κ. Note that ¯ κ is defined as a dimen- sionless quantity, ¯κ = κ/(1026 cm1/2 g1/2 s−2). The coefficients can be expressed as follows: ai = 4X j=0 bj [¯κ]j + 4X l=1 cl [¯κ]−l . (26) Again, all bj and cl are fitting parameters for a specific ai in Eq. (25). In Appendix A, we provide table...

    2024

  7. [7]

    The wave speeds are given by v2 ∥ = ˜v2 + 4 3 ˜µ ˜ρ + ˜p , (B1) v2 ⊥ = ˜µ ˜ρ + ˜p , (B2) where v∥ is the longitudinal wave speed and v⊥ is the transverse wave speed

    W ave Speeds in Elastic Matter Within isotropic elastic matter in the linear (Hookean) regime [87], there are two distinct wave speeds corre- sponding to the longitudinal wave and transverse wave, respectively. The wave speeds are given by v2 ∥ = ˜v2 + 4 3 ˜µ ˜ρ + ˜p , (B1) v2 ⊥ = ˜µ ˜ρ + ˜p , (B2) where v∥ is the longitudinal wave speed and v⊥ is the tra...

  8. [8]

    effective EOS

    Parameter Space Depiction of W ave Speed Let us first examine the behavior of wave speeds. In this section, we select a model with a relatively low tran- sition pressure ptrans = 2 × 1033 dyn cm−2, which re- sults in a larger elastic core, enhancing the visibility of anisotropy effects. Figure 9 illustrates how the wave speeds vary as one moves outward fr...

    2003

Show all 98 references
  1. [9]

    Douchin, P

    F. Douchin, P. Haensel, and J. Meyer, Nuclear surface and curvature properties for sly skyrme forces and nu- clei in the inner neutron-star crust, Nucl. Phys. A 665, 419–446 (2000)

    2000

  2. [10]

    Haensel, A

    P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, Neu- tron stars 1, 2007th ed., Astrophysics and Space Science Library (Springer, New York, NY, 2007)

    2007

  3. [11]

    Alford, J

    M. Alford, J. A. Bowers, and K. Rajagopal, Crystalline color superconductivity, Phys. Rev. D 63, 074016 (2001)

    2001

  4. [12]

    J. P. Pereira, M. Bejger, N. Andersson, and F. Gittins, Tidal deformations of hybrid stars with sharp phase tran- sitions and elastic crusts, The Astrophysical Journal895, 28 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    P. N. McDermott, H. M. van Horn, and C. J. Hansen, Nonradial oscillations of neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 325, 725 (1988)

    1988

  6. [14]

    C. J. Kr¨ uger, W. C. G. Ho, and N. Andersson, Seismology of adolescent neutron stars: Accounting for thermal ef- fects and crust elasticity, Phys. Rev. D92, 063009 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    Tsang, J

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro, and R. Bondarescu, Resonant shattering of neutron star crusts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011102 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    J. P. Pereira, M. Bejger, P. Haensel, and J. L. Zdunik, Crustal failure as a tool to probe hybrid stars, The As- trophysical Journal 950, 185 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Haskell, D

    B. Haskell, D. I. Jones, and N. Andersson, Mountains on neutron stars: accreted versus non-accreted crusts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 373, 1423 (2006), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/373/4/1423/11177018/mnras0373-1423.pdf

    2006

  10. [18]

    Ushomirsky, C

    G. Ushomirsky, C. Cutler, and L. Bildsten, De- formations of accreting neutron star crusts and gravitational wave emission, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 319, 902 (2000), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/319/3/902/3735798/319-3-902.pdf

    2000

  11. [19]

    S. Y. Lau, P. T. Leung, and L.-M. Lin, Two-layer com- pact stars with crystalline quark matter: Screening ef- fect on the tidal deformability, Phys. Rev. D 99, 023018 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Alford, Color-superconducting quark matter, Annu

    M. Alford, Color-superconducting quark matter, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51, 131–160 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Rajagopal, Crystalline color superconductivity, Nucl

    K. Rajagopal, Crystalline color superconductivity, Nucl. Phys. A 702, 25–38 (2002)

    2002

  14. [22]

    R. X. Xu, Solid quark stars?, Astrophys. J. 596, L59 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    N. K. Johnson-McDaniel and B. J. Owen, Shear modu- lus of the hadron-quark mixed phase, Phys. Rev. D 86, 063006 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Haskell, N

    B. Haskell, N. Andersson, D. I. Jones, and L. Samuelsson, Are neutron stars with crystalline color-superconducting cores relevant for the ligo experiment?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 231101 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    N. K. Johnson-McDaniel and B. J. Owen, Maximum elas- tic deformations of relativistic stars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 044004 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    S. Y. Lau, P. T. Leung, and L.-M. Lin, Tidal defor- mations of compact stars with crystalline quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95, 101302 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Nat´ ario, Rigid elastic solids in relativity, Class

    J. Nat´ ario, Rigid elastic solids in relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 37, 235006 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Anglani, R

    R. Anglani, R. Casalbuoni, M. Ciminale, N. Ippolito, R. Gatto, M. Mannarelli, and M. Ruggieri, Crystalline color superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 509 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Lin, Torsional oscillations of crystalline color- superconducting hybrid stars: Possible sources for ad- vanced ligo?, Phys

    L.-M. Lin, Torsional oscillations of crystalline color- superconducting hybrid stars: Possible sources for ad- vanced ligo?, Phys. Rev. D 88, 124002 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    S. Y. Lau, Physical properties of compact stars containing crystalline color superconductors, Master’s thesis, Chi- nese University of Hong Kong, Department of Physics (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Carter and H

    B. Carter and H. Quintana, Foundations of general rel- ativistic high-pressure elasticity theory, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 331, 57 (1972)

    1972

  24. [32]

    Karlovini and L

    M. Karlovini and L. Samuelsson, Elastic stars in general relativity. 1. Foundations and equilibrium models, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 3613 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211026

    2003 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Brito, J

    I. Brito, J. Carot, and E. G. L. R. Vaz, General spheri- cally symmetric elastic stars in relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 2357–2382 (2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    Brito, J

    I. Brito, J. Carot, and E. G. L. R. Vaz, Erratum to: General spherically symmetric elastic stars in relativity, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 287–301 (2011)

    2011

  27. [35]

    Andersson and G

    N. Andersson and G. L. Comer, Relativistic fluid dynam- ics: physics for many different scales, Living Rev. Relativ. 24 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Compact elastic objects in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 105, 044025 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Cardoso, L

    V. Cardoso, L. C. B. Crispino, C. F. B. Macedo, H. Okawa, and P. Pani, Light rings as observational evi- dence for event horizons: Long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044069 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Keir, Slowly decaying waves on spherically symmet- ric spacetimes and ultracompact neutron stars, Class

    J. Keir, Slowly decaying waves on spherically symmet- ric spacetimes and ultracompact neutron stars, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 135009 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    L. S. Finn, Non-radial pulsations of neutron stars with a crust, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 245, 82–82 (1990)

    1990

  32. [40]

    Yoshida and U

    S. Yoshida and U. Lee, Nonradial oscillations of neu- tron stars with a solid crust: Analysis in the relativistic cowling approximation, Astron. Astrophys. 395, 201–208 (2002)

    2002

  33. [41]

    (90% confidence interval, light blue and blue regions), J0030+0451 with NICER (95% confidence interval, maroon region) [47], J0740+6620 with NICER and XMM-Newton (95% confidence interval, orange region) [45], J0437-4715 with NICER (95% confidence interval, violet region) [46],...

  34. [42]

    A. J. Penner, N. Andersson, L. Samuelsson, I. Hawke, and D. I. Jones, Tidal deformations of neutron stars: The role of stratification and elasticity, Phys. Rev. D 84, 103006 (2011)

    2011

  35. [43]

    J. P. Pereira and G. Lugones, General relativistic sur- face degrees of freedom in perturbed hybrid stars, Astro- phys. J. 871, 47 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    J. P. Pereira, M. Bejger, L. Tonetto, G. Lugones, P. Haensel, J. L. Zdunik, and M. Sieniawska, Probing elastic quark phases in hybrid stars with radius measure- ments, The Astrophysical Journal 910, 145 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Mannarelli, K

    M. Mannarelli, K. Rajagopal, and R. Sharma, Rigidity of crystalline color superconducting quark matter, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074026 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    Z. Z. Dong, J. C. Faggert, S. Y. Lau, and K. Yagi, Love–c relations for elastic hybrid stars, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 16 56, 113 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, and A. Vuori- nen, Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star- matter equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 172703 (2018)

    2018

  40. [48]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Observation of gravi- tational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  41. [50]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), Properties of the binary neutron star merger gw170817, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011001 (2019)

    2019

  42. [51]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bog- danov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, R. M. Lud- lam, S. Mahmoodifar, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, T. E. Strohmayer, K. S. Wood, T. Enoto, R. Foster, T. Oka- jima, G. Prigoz...

    2019

  43. [52]

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S. M. Morsink, P. S. Ray, M. T. Wolff, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Man- thripragada, C. B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cogna...

    2021

  44. [53]

    Salmi, D

    T. Salmi, D. Choudhury, Y. Kini, T. E. Riley, S. Vin- ciguerra, A. L. Watts, M. T. Wolff, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bogdanov, D. Chakrabarty, K. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, D. Huppenkothen, R. M. Ludlam, S. M. Morsink, and P. S. Ray, The radius of the high-mass pul- sar psr j0...

    2024

  45. [54]

    Choudhury, T

    D. Choudhury, T. Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, T. E. Riley, Y. Kini, A. L. Watts, B. Dorsman, S. Bogdanov, S. Guil- lot, P. S. Ray, D. J. Reardon, R. A. Remillard, A. V. Bilous, D. Huppenkothen, J. M. Lattimer, N. Rutherford, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. M. Morsink, and W. C. G...

    2024

  46. [55]

    Vinciguerra, T

    S. Vinciguerra, T. Salmi, A. L. Watts, D. Choudhury, T. E. Riley, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, Y. Kini, S. Guillot, D. Chakrabarty, W. C. G. Ho, D. Huppenkothen, S. M. Morsink, Z. Wadiasingh, and M. T. Wolff, An updated mass–radius analysis of the 2017–2018 nicer data set of psr j0...

    2024

  47. [56]

    Chatziioannou, H

    K. Chatziioannou, H. T. Cromartie, S. Gandolfi, I. Tews, D. Radice, A. W. Steiner, and A. L. Watts, Neutron stars and the dense matter equation of state: from microscopic theory to macroscopic observations (2024), arXiv:2407.11153 [nucl-th]

    2024

  48. [57]

    R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity, Astrophys. J. 188, 657 (1974)

    1974

  49. [58]

    Cosenza, L

    M. Cosenza, L. Herrera, M. Esculpi, and L. Witten, Some models of anisotropic spheres in general relativity, J. Math. Phys. 22, 118 (1981)

    1981

  50. [59]

    S. S ¸. Bayin, Anisotropic fluid spheres in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 26, 1262 (1982)

    1982

  51. [60]

    Hillebrandt and K

    W. Hillebrandt and K. O. Steinmetz, Anisotropic neu- tron star models: stability against radial and nonradial pulsations., Astron. Astrophys. 53, 283 (1976)

    1976

  52. [61]

    Dev and M

    K. Dev and M. Gleiser, Anisotropic stars II: Stability, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 35, 1435 (2003)

    2003

  53. [62]

    Horvat, S

    D. Horvat, S. Iliji´ c, and A. Marunovi´ c, Radial pulsations and stability of anisotropic stars with a quasi-local equa- tion of state, Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 025009 (2010)

    2010

  54. [63]

    J. D. Arba˜ nil and M. Malheiro, Radial stability of anisotropic strange quark stars, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2016 (11), 012–012

    2016

  55. [64]

    A. A. Isayev, General relativistic polytropes in anisotropic stars, Phys. Rev. D 96, 083007 (2017)

    2017

  56. [65]

    Pretel, Equilibrium, radial stability and non-adiabatic gravitational collapse of anisotropic neutron stars, Eur

    J. Pretel, Equilibrium, radial stability and non-adiabatic gravitational collapse of anisotropic neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020)

    2020

  57. [66]

    Cadogan and E

    T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Self-gravitating anisotropic fluids. i: Context and overview (2024), arXiv:2406.03185 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [67]

    Cadogan and E

    T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Self-gravitating anisotropic fluid. II: Newtonian theory, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 56, 119 (2024), arXiv:2406.03191 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Cadogan and E

    T. Cadogan and E. Poisson, Self-gravitating anisotropic fluid. III: relativistic theory, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 56, 120 (2024), arXiv:2406.03196 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [69]

    H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. De- morest, Z. Arzoumanian, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, N. Garver-Daniels, P. A. Gentile, M. L. Jones, M. T. Lam, D. R. Lorimer, R. S. Lynch, M. A. McLaugh- lin, C....

    2020 arXiv

  61. [70]

    A. Alho, J. Nat´ ario, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Spheri- cally symmetric elastic bodies in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 41, 073002 (2024)

    2024

  62. [71]

    Akmal, V

    A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1804 (1998)

    1998

  63. [72]

    M. G. Alford, S. Han, and M. Prakash, Generic condi- tions for stable hybrid stars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083013 (2013)

    2013

  64. [73]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and C. B. Thorn, Baryon structure in the bag theory, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2599 (1974)

    1974

  65. [74]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  66. [75]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Approximate universal relations for neutron stars and quark stars, Physics Reports 681, 1 (2017), approximate Universal Relations for Neutron Stars and Quark Stars

    2017

  67. [76]

    Yagi and N

    K. Yagi and N. Yunes, Binary love relations, Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 13LT01 (2016)

    2016

  68. [77]

    Chatziioannou, C.-J

    K. Chatziioannou, C.-J. Haster, and A. Zimmerman, Measuring the neutron star tidal deformability with 17 equation-of-state-independent relations and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 97, 104036 (2018)

    2018

  69. [78]

    Maselli, V

    A. Maselli, V. Cardoso, V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, and P. Pani, Equation-of-state-independent relations in neu- tron stars, Phys. Rev. D 88, 023007 (2013)

    2013

  70. [79]

    Urbanec, J

    M. Urbanec, J. C. Miller, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Quadrupole moments of rotating neutron stars and strange stars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 433, 1903 (2013), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/433/3/1903/4051531/stt858.pdf

    2013

  71. [80]

    Xie and B.-A

    W.-J. Xie and B.-A. Li, Bayesian inference of the dense- matter equation of state encapsulating a first-order hadron-quark phase transition from observables of canon- ical neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 103, 035802 (2021)

    2021

  72. [81]

    S. De, D. Finstad, J. M. Lattimer, D. A. Brown, E. Berger, and C. M. Biwer, Tidal deformabilities and radii of neutron stars from the observation of gw170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 091102 (2018)

    2018

  73. [82]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer, A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Millisecond p...

    2019

  74. [83]

    J. M. Lattimer and A. W. Steiner, Constraints on the symmetry energy using the mass-radius relation of neu- tron stars, The European Physical Journal A 50, 40 (2014)

    2014

  75. [84]

    Z. F. Seidov, The stability of a star with a phase change in general relativity theory, Soviet Astronomy 15, 347 (1971)

    1971

  76. [85]

    J. C. Faggert, Probing Crystalline Color Superconducting Phase of Quark Matter through Universal Relations for Hybrid Stars, Thesis, Virginia U. (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    Karlovini and L

    M. Karlovini and L. Samuelsson, Elastic stars in general relativity: I. foundations and equilibrium models, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 771 (2005)

    2005

  78. [87]

    Zhao and J

    T. Zhao and J. M. Lattimer, Tidal deformabilities and neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D 98, 063020 (2018)

    2018

  79. [88]

    P. V. P. Cunha, E. Berti, and C. A. R. Herdeiro, Light- ring stability for ultracompact objects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251102 (2017)

    2017

  80. [89]

    Z. Z. Dong, Anisotropy fitting process (2024), gitHub repository

    2024

  81. [90]

    J. M. Bardeen, K. S. Thorne, and D. W. Meltzer, A cat- alogue of methods for studying the normal modes of ra- dial pulsation of general-relativistic stellar models, As- trophys. J. 145, 505 (1966)

    1966

  82. [91]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Ob- jects (Wiley, 1983)

    1983

  83. [92]

    Karlovini, L

    M. Karlovini, L. Samuelsson, and M. Zarroug, Elastic stars in general relativity: Ii. radial perturbations, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 1559–1581 (2004)

    2004

  84. [93]

    J. P. Pereira, C. V. Flores, and G. Lugones, Phase transi- tion effects on the dynamical stability of hybrid neutron stars, Astrophys. J. 860, 12 (2018)

    2018

  85. [94]

    C.-M. Yip, S. Y. Lau, and K. Yagi, (in preparation)

  86. [95]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1986)

    1986

  87. [96]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 10 44, 1–14 (1966)

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 10 44, 1–14 (1966)

    1966

  88. [97]

    Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    E. Poisson, A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    2004

  89. [98]

    J. P. Pereira, J. G. Coelho, and J. A. Rueda, Stability of thin-shell interfaces inside compact stars, Phys. Rev. D 90, 123011 (2014)

    2014

  90. [99]

    F. S. N. Lobo and P. Crawford, Stability analysis of dy- namic thin shells, Class. Quantum Gravity22, 4869–4885 (2005)

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.