Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 87 references

Seamless Detection: Unifying Salient Object Detection and Camouflaged Object Detection

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single shared network can segment both salient and camouflaged objects without knowing which task it is solving.

desk verdict A genuinely task-agnostic SOD/COD network with strong results, but two equation-level inconsistencies make the exact method ambiguous until the code is checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16840 v1 pith:DTV6EXVL submitted 2024-12-22 cs.CV

Yi Liu , Chengxin Li , Xiaohui Dong , Lei Li , Dingwen Zhang , Shoukun Xu , Jungong Han This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords salientobjectdetectioncamouflagedcontrastivelearningtask-agnosticunsupervisedbinarysegmentationpseudo-mask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to prove that salient object detection (finding objects that stand out) and camouflaged object detection (finding objects that hide in their surroundings) can be solved by a single network that never needs to be told which task it is facing. The paper argues that both tasks share an underlying binary segmentation nature: isolating the foreground from the background. The authors introduce a Contrastive Distillation Paradigm (CDP) that trains the network by pulling a foreground semantic vector away from a background semantic vector, and show that it works in both supervised and unsupervised settings. If correct, this matters because real scenes often contain objects that are simultaneously salient and camouflaged, and a task-agnostic model could handle them without forewarning. The paper reports competitive supervised performance and state-of-the-art unsupervised results on public SOD and COD benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The Contrastive Distillation Paradigm (CDP) is the load-bearing mechanism: it computes a foreground semantic vector from a fully-connected layer over the decoder's target inference, and a background semantic vector from the third-layer backbone features masked by the complement of the ground truth or pseudo-mask, then applies a negative contrastive loss that penalizes the cosine similarity between the two within a batch. This forces the network to represent the foreground/background boundary that is common to both SOD and COD. The decoder itself is the IGC (Interval-layer and Global Context) block, which concatenates interval-layer feature pairs (F0 with F2, F1 with F3) plus the deepest global feature F4, merges them by element-wise multiplication, and averages along channels to yield the target map. CDP is designed as a plug-in, so it can be added to existing segmentation models; the unsupervised mode uses pseudo-masks generated from a self-supervised vision transformer's deep features and updated by a moving average each epoch.

What would settle it

Present the trained unified model with images that contain both a salient object and a camouflaged object in the same scene, and compare its single output against the union of the two ground truths; if it cannot segment both types in one coherent map, the task-agnostic claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that SOD and COD are not contradictory tasks but two expressions of one problem: separating foreground from background. To make this concrete, the authors build a single encoder-decoder whose decoder produces a foreground map, and then distill that map away from background semantics drawn from the encoder's third layer masked by the complement of the ground truth (or a pseudo-mask). The contrastive loss pushes the foreground and background vectors apart across every image pair in a batch, so the network learns a feature space where 'object' is defined relative to its surroundings rather than by saliency or camouflage. The same shared parameters are used at test time for both SOD and COD, with no task identifier. In the unsupervised variant, initial pseudo-masks are generated by parsing the features of a self-supervised vision transformer and then refined each epoch; the paper reports that this achieves state-of-the-art results on SOD and COD benchmarks without human annotation.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes that salient and camouflaged objects can both be captured by one shared foreground-versus-background distinction in a single feature space, without any task-specific adaptation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single trained model can be deployed in the field without a task selector, handling images that mix salient and camouflaged objects.
  • CDP can be dropped into existing SOD or COD architectures and improves their performance on the opposite task, as the ablations with CPD, ITSD, and MINet show.
  • The unsupervised mode removes the need for pixel-level human annotation, making joint SOD and COD learning feasible on unlabeled image collections.
  • With 67 fps inference and small parameter and FLOP counts, the framework is practical for real-time and embedded use.
  • The same foreground/background contrastive distillation may transfer to other binary segmentation problems, including forgery detection and shadow removal, as the conclusion suggests.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: if the contrastive distillation is the true source of the unification, then a model trained with CDP should degrade less gracefully than without it when test images are corrupted or backgrounds change, a robustness prediction not tested here.
  • Beyond the paper: the choice of third-layer features for background semantics hints that mid-level features carry the background context that best separates objects from surroundings; a principled sweep across layers on other architectures could turn this heuristic into a design rule.
  • Beyond the paper: the moving-average pseudo-mask updating suggests that CDP carries an implicit tolerance to label noise; this could be tested directly by corrupting a fraction of ground truths with random flips and measuring whether the unified framework degrades faster than task-specific baselines.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a task-agnostic framework that unifies salient object detection (SOD) and camouflaged object detection (COD) in a single encoder-decoder network. The key contributions are a Contrastive Distillation Paradigm (CDP) that contrasts foreground and background semantics, an interval-layer and global context (IGC) decoder, and an unsupervised variant in which DINO-derived pseudo masks are updated during training. The authors report competitive supervised results on five SOD and four COD benchmarks, state-of-the-art unsupervised results, and a real-time inference speed of 67 fps.

Significance. If the method and experiments are valid, the paper makes a useful contribution: it demonstrates that a single shared network can handle both SOD and COD without task knowledge, which is an advance over the task-specific UJSC baseline, and it provides a lightweight decoder with fast inference. The paper also ships an extensive set of ablations (CDP, components, pseudo-mask sources, background layers, pseudo-label updates) and compares against a broad range of supervised and unsupervised methods. The main caveat is that the formal definitions of two load-bearing components, the contrastive loss and the pseudo-mask update, contain algebraic or indexing errors that make the described method ambiguous and, in the case of Eq. (13), degenerate as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4.2, Eq. (13)] The pseudo-mask update is not a valid recurrence because the same epoch index i appears on both sides: PM_i = λPM_i + (1−λ)T_act_i. For λ ≠ 1 this algebraically reduces to PM_i = T_act_i, so the previous pseudo-mask is discarded and the model is trained on its own current prediction. This is not the moving-average strategy described in the text or credited for the gains in Table 8(a). Please state the intended recurrence (e.g., PM_i = λPM_{i−1} + (1−λ)T_act_i), verify that the released code implements it, and rerun or reinterpret the Table 8(a) ablation accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 3.3, Eq. (8)] The double sum runs over i and j, but the summand depends only on i, so the printed loss reduces to −(1/n)Σ_i log(1 − cos(v^b_i, v^f_i)), a per-sample foreground-background penalty, rather than the batch-level contrast implied by the 1/n² normalization. This changes the mechanism and affects the interpretation of the CDP ablations in Tables 4–6. Please correct the equation (for example, by introducing a dependence on j in the inner term) or revise the description to match the actual implementation, and confirm which form the released code uses.
  3. [Sec. 3.3, Eqs. (6)–(7)] Both equations are underspecified: a fully-connected layer cannot directly consume the 2D map T in Eq. (6) or the 3D tensor E2 in Eq. (7) without a pooling or flattening operation. As written, the dimensions do not work out to the claimed 64-dimensional vectors v^f and v^b. Please specify the global average pooling (or equivalent) step and update the equations; otherwise the core CDP module is not reproducible from the paper.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4.2] The sentence 'L_D computes the contrast between the current-epoch target inference and the previous-epoch background' is inconsistent with the definitions: L_D is the BCE+SSIM+IoU loss in Eq. (12), while the contrastive loss is L_NEG from Eq. (8). Please reword this sentence.
  2. [Sec. 3.4.2, Eq. (13)] The notation is inconsistent: the text says the superscript denotes the training epoch, but Eq. (13) uses a subscript i on PM and T_act. Please unify the notation to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'Pseuod mask update' should be 'Pseudo mask update' and 'conduct a serious of experiments' should be 'conduct a series of experiments'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Unsupervised pseudo-mask update Eq. (13) is self-referential: it reduces to PM_i = T_act^i, so the moving-average mechanism credited for the unsupervised SOTA is not implemented by the printed equations.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.4.2, Eq. (13), 'Pseuod mask update']
    "pseudo labels are updated during the training epochs using the following moving average strategy PM_i = { PM_0, i ≤ 2, λPM_i + (1−λ)T_act^i, i > 2, (13) where the superscript means the training epoch."

    Equation (13) has the same epoch index i on both sides. Rearranging gives (1−λ)PM_i = (1−λ)T_act^i, hence PM_i = T_act^i for i>2. Thus the "updated" pseudo mask is not a moving average over previous epochs (which would require PM_{i-1} on the right-hand side) but exactly the model's current inference. The unsupervised training loss L_D in Eq. (12) then supervises the current prediction against itself, and L_NEG via Eq. (11) contrasts the foreground vector derived from that same prediction with the background derived from its complement.

full rationale

The supervised branch is self-contained: T_act is trained with L_D against ground truth on DUTS, CAMO, and COD10K, and evaluated on held-out SOD/COD benchmarks, so no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The task-agnostic architecture is externally benchmarked against UJSC, ZoomNet, and other methods, giving the supervised claims independent content. The CDP loss in Eq. (8) has a formal index error: the double sum's summand does not depend on j, so the printed loss is a per-image foreground/background separation rather than the batch-level contrast implied by the n^2 normalization; that is a reproducibility defect, not itself a circular reduction. The circular step is confined to the unsupervised pseudo-mask update. As printed, Eq. (13) is not a recurrence over epochs; solving it gives PM_i = T_act^i. Consequently, after epoch 2 the model is trained against its own current output, so the moving-average mechanism credited for the Table 8(a) gains and the unsupervised SOTA is not implemented by the paper's equations. This makes the unsupervised result partially self-referential, while the supervised results remain independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows one explicitly tuned free parameter (lambda) and three domain assumptions about task equivalence, DINO pseudo-mask quality, and layer selection. No new physical or conceptual entities are invented.

free parameters (1)
  • pseudo-mask moving-average factor lambda = 0.4
    Equation 13 sets the EMA weight for pseudo-label updates; the paper says 'experimentally set to 0.4' with no sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption SOD and COD are sufficiently characterized by binary foreground/background segmentation with a single shared feature space.
    The whole framework rests on this 'agreeable nature' stated in the Introduction and Sec. 3.1; no evidence is given that a single network cannot be confused by task identity.
  • domain assumption DINO self-supervised features yield pseudo-masks accurate enough to bootstrap unsupervised training.
    Sec. 3.4.2 uses DINO-derived pseudo masks as the initial supervision; the comparison in Table 7(b) supports this for their setup but the dependence on DINO is an external model.
  • domain assumption Third-layer ResNet-50 features (E2) provide the best background semantics for both tasks.
    Sec. 4.4.4 selects E2 by ablation; this is an empirically tuned architectural assumption, not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Seamless Detection: Unifying Salient Object Detection and Camouflaged Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DTV6EXVL

@misc{pith2026241216840,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Seamless Detection: Unifying Salient Object Detection and Camouflaged Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DTV6EXVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16840}
}
read the original abstract

Achieving joint learning of Salient Object Detection (SOD) and Camouflaged Object Detection (COD) is extremely challenging due to their distinct object characteristics, i.e., saliency and camouflage. The only preliminary research treats them as two contradictory tasks, training models on large-scale labeled data alternately for each task and assessing them independently. However, such task-specific mechanisms fail to meet real-world demands for addressing unknown tasks effectively. To address this issue, in this paper, we pioneer a task-agnostic framework to unify SOD and COD. To this end, inspired by the agreeable nature of binary segmentation for SOD and COD, we propose a Contrastive Distillation Paradigm (CDP) to distil the foreground from the background, facilitating the identification of salient and camouflaged objects amidst their surroundings. To probe into the contribution of our CDP, we design a simple yet effective contextual decoder involving the interval-layer and global context, which achieves an inference speed of 67 fps. Besides the supervised setting, our CDP can be seamlessly integrated into unsupervised settings, eliminating the reliance on extensive human annotations. Experiments on public SOD and COD datasets demonstrate the superiority of our proposed framework in both supervised and unsupervised settings, compared with existing state-of-the-art approaches. Code is available on https://github.com/liuyi1989/Seamless-Detection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16840 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An easy example for the co-existing saliency and camouflage scene. A chameleon is salient when it appear in a new scene. However, it will change its body appearance to conceal itself in the surroundings, which makes it camouflaged. For the event, it is not reasonable to detect the chameleon using the individual salient or camouflaged object detection model. Inspired by this observation, it is necessary to design a t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Motivation statement. The previous UJSC [21] is task-specific, which must fed salient and camouflaged image into SOD network and COD network correspondingly, otherwise generating poor results. This challenge can well be solved by our task-agnostic framework. by two branches of encoders and decoders that share the structures but not parameters. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the framework. E∗ is the last layer of different blocks in ResNet-50 [15]. 𝐷 and 𝑁𝐸𝐺 denote the training losses of Eq. (9) and Eq. (8), respectively. Under the supervised setting, the foreground map inferred by IGC is supervised by ground truth. Besides, the foreground semantics and background semantics, generated by the decoder and encoder of IGC, respectively, are supervised using the contrastive los… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visualizations for pseudo masks update. idea is to compute the contrast between the target inference and the background with the purpose of training the model for better inference. To this end, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual comparison for SOD and COD in the supervised setting. in the unsupervised setting, the previous methods mostly introduce lots of noise in the detected saliency map, and even cannot identify the camouflaged objects. Differently, our model has the ability of ident…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visual comparison for SOD and COD in the unsupervised setting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Efficiency comparison. under both supervised and unsupervised settings, respec￾tively. The results of joint training will be lower than that of separate manner, which is reasonable because joint SOD and COD datasets inevitably introduce domain bias. 4.4.7. Inference ef…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Frequency- tunedsalientregiondetection,in:2009IEEEconferenceoncomputer vision and pattern recognition, IEEE

    Achanta,R.,Hemami,S.,Estrada,F.,Susstrunk,S.,2009. Frequency- tunedsalientregiondetection,in:2009IEEEconferenceoncomputer vision and pattern recognition, IEEE. pp. 1597–1604

    2009

  2. [2]

    Salient object detection: A benchmark

    Borji, A., Cheng, M.M., Jiang, H., Li, J., 2015. Salient object detection: A benchmark. IEEE transactions on image processing 24, 5706–5722

    2015

  3. [3]

    Stochastic gradient descent tricks, in: Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition

    Bottou, L., 2012. Stochastic gradient descent tricks, in: Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition. Springer, pp. 421– 436

    2012

  4. [4]

    Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, pp

    Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jégou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A., 2021. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international confer- ence on computer vision, pp. 9650–9660

    2021

  5. [5]

    Reverse attention for salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp

    Chen, S., Tan, X., Wang, B., Hu, X., 2018. Reverse attention for salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp. 234–250

    2018

  6. [6]

    Electromagnetic scattering from foliage camouflaged complex targets

    Dehmollaian, M., Sarabandi, K., 2006. Electromagnetic scattering from foliage camouflaged complex targets. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 44, 2698–2709

    2006

  7. [7]

    Efficient saliency-based object detection in remote sensing images using deep belief networks

    Diao, W., Sun, X., Zheng, X., Dou, F., Wang, H., Fu, K., 2016. Efficient saliency-based object detection in remote sensing images using deep belief networks. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters 13, 137–141

    2016

  8. [8]

    Structure- measure: A new way to evaluate foreground maps, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp

    Fan, D.P., Cheng, M.M., Liu, Y., Li, T., Borji, A., 2017. Structure- measure: A new way to evaluate foreground maps, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 4548– 4557

    work page 2017

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    Enhanced-alignment measure for binary foreground map evaluation

    Fan, D.P., Gong, C., Cao, Y., Ren, B., Cheng, M.M., Borji, A., 2018. Enhanced-alignment measure for binary foreground map evaluation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10421

    2018 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Camouflaged object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Fan, D.P., Ji, G.P., Sun, G., Cheng, M.M., Shen, J., Shao, L., 2020. Camouflaged object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2777– 2787

    2020

  3. [11]

    Surveillance face anti-spoofing

    Fang,H.,Liu,A.,Wan,J.,Escalera,S.,Zhao,C.,Zhang,X.,Li,S.Z., Lei, Z., 2023. Surveillance face anti-spoofing. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security . Yi Liu et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 11 of 13

    2023

  4. [12]

    Image forgery detection

    Farid, H., 2009. Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal processing magazine 26, 16–25

    2009

  5. [13]

    IEEETransactionsonCircuitsandSystemsforVideoTechnology25, 1309–1321

    Han,J.,Zhang,D.,Hu,X.,Guo,L.,Ren,J.,Wu,F.,2014.Background prior-based salient object detection via deep reconstruction residual. IEEETransactionsonCircuitsandSystemsforVideoTechnology25, 1309–1321

    2014

  6. [14]

    He, C., Li, K., Zhang, Y., Tang, L., Zhang, Y., Guo, Z., Li, X.,

  7. [15]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J., 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 770–778

    2016

  8. [16]

    5557–5566

    Huang,Z.,Dai,H.,Xiang,T.Z.,Wang,S.,Chen,H.X.,Qin,J.,Xiong, H.,2023.Featureshrinkagepyramidforcamouflagedobjectdetection with transformers, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5557–5566

    2023

  9. [17]

    Salientobjectdetection:Adiscriminativeregionalfeatureintegration approach,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEEconferenceoncomputervision and pattern recognition, pp

    Jiang, H., Wang, J., Yuan, Z., Wu, Y., Zheng, N., Li, S., 2013. Salientobjectdetection:Adiscriminativeregionalfeatureintegration approach,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEEconferenceoncomputervision and pattern recognition, pp. 2083–2090

    2013

  10. [18]

    Imagenet classifi- cation with deep convolutional neural networks

    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E., 2012. Imagenet classifi- cation with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 25

    2012

  11. [19]

    Saliencyheat-mapasvisualat- tention for autonomous driving using generative adversarial network (gan)

    Lateef,F.,Kas,M.,Ruichek,Y.,2021. Saliencyheat-mapasvisualat- tention for autonomous driving using generative adversarial network (gan). IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23, 5360–5373

    2021

  12. [20]

    Anabranch network for camouflaged object segmentation

    Le, T.N., Nguyen, T.V., Nie, Z., Tran, M.T., Sugimoto, A., 2019. Anabranch network for camouflaged object segmentation. Computer vision and image understanding 184, 45–56

    2019

  13. [21]

    10071–10081

    Li,A.,Zhang,J.,Lv,Y.,Liu,B.,Zhang,T.,Dai,Y.,2021.Uncertainty- aware joint salient object and camouflaged object detection, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10071–10081

    2021

  14. [22]

    Visual saliency based on multiscale deep features, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Li, G., Yu, Y., 2015. Visual saliency based on multiscale deep features, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 5455–5463

    2015

  15. [23]

    Objectdetection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark

    Li,K.,Wan,G.,Cheng,G.,Meng,L.,Han,J.,2020. Objectdetection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark. ISPRSjournalofphotogrammetryandremotesensing159,296–307

    2020

  16. [24]

    Revisiting gradient regularization: Inject robust saliency-aware weight bias for adversar- ialdefense

    Li, Q., Hu, Q., Lin, C., Wu, D., Shen, C., 2023. Revisiting gradient regularization: Inject robust saliency-aware weight bias for adversar- ialdefense. IEEETransactionsonInformationForensicsandSecurity

    2023

  17. [25]

    Targeted supervised contrastive learning for long- tailed recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Li, T., Cao, P., Yuan, Y., Fan, L., Yang, Y., Feris, R.S., Indyk, P., Katabi, D., 2022. Targeted supervised contrastive learning for long- tailed recognition, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6918–6928

    2022

  18. [26]

    The secrets of salient object segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conferenceoncomputervisionandpatternrecognition,pp.280–287

    Li, Y., Hou, X., Koch, C., Rehg, J.M., Yuille, A.L., 2014. The secrets of salient object segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conferenceoncomputervisionandpatternrecognition,pp.280–287

    2014

  19. [27]

    A causal debiasing framework for unsupervised salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp

    Lin, X., Wu, Z., Chen, G., Li, G., Yu, Y., 2022. A causal debiasing framework for unsupervised salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1610–1619

    2022

  20. [28]

    Picanet: Learning pixel-wise contextual attention for saliency detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Liu, N., Han, J., Yang, M.H., 2018a. Picanet: Learning pixel-wise contextual attention for saliency detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3089–3098

  21. [29]

    Visual saliency transformer, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp

    Liu, N., Zhang, N., Wan, K., Shao, L., Han, J., 2021a. Visual saliency transformer, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 4722–4732

  22. [30]

    Liu,T.,Yuan,Z.,Sun,J.,Wang,J.,Zheng,N.,Tang,X.,Shum,H.Y.,

  23. [31]

    Salientobjectdetection viatwo-stagegraphs

    Liu,Y.,Han,J.,Zhang,Q.,Wang,L.,2018b. Salientobjectdetection viatwo-stagegraphs. IEEETransactionsonCircuitsandSystemsfor Video Technology 29, 1023–1037

  24. [32]

    Disentangled cap- suleroutingforfastpart-objectrelationalsaliency

    Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, N., Xu, S., Han, J., 2022. Disentangled cap- suleroutingforfastpart-objectrelationalsaliency. IEEETransactions on Image Processing 31, 6719–6732

    2022

  25. [33]

    Integratingpart-object relationship and contrast for camouflaged object detection

    Liu,Y.,Zhang,D.,Zhang,Q.,Han,J.,2021b. Integratingpart-object relationship and contrast for camouflaged object detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 16, 5154–5166

  26. [34]

    Part-object relational visual saliency

    Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Zhang, Q., Han, J., 2021c. Part-object relational visual saliency. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 44, 3688–3704

  27. [35]

    Employing deep part- objectrelationshipsforsalientobjectdetection,in:Proceedingsofthe IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp

    Liu, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, D., Han, J., 2019. Employing deep part- objectrelationshipsforsalientobjectdetection,in:Proceedingsofthe IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 1232– 1241

    2019

  28. [36]

    Clcc:Contrastivelearningforcolorconstancy,in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Lo, Y.C., Chang, C.C., Chiu, H.C., Huang, Y.H., Chen, C.P., Chang, Y.L.,Jou,K.,2021. Clcc:Contrastivelearningforcolorconstancy,in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8053–8063

    2021

  29. [37]

    Simultaneously localize, segment and rank the camouflaged objects, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Lv,Y.,Zhang,J.,Dai,Y.,Li,A.,Liu,B.,Barnes,N.,Fan,D.P.,2021. Simultaneously localize, segment and rank the camouflaged objects, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11591–11601

    2021

  30. [38]

    Cam- ouflaged object segmentation with distraction mining, in: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Mei, H., Ji, G.P., Wei, Z., Yang, X., Wei, X., Fan, D.P., 2021. Cam- ouflaged object segmentation with distraction mining, in: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8772–8781

    2021

  31. [39]

    Melas-Kyriazi, L., Rupprecht, C., Laina, I., Vedaldi, A., 2022. Deep spectral methods: A surprisingly strong baseline for unsuper- vised semantic segmentation and localization, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVFConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition, pp. 8364–8375

    2022

  32. [40]

    Tracking without label:Unsupervisedmultipleobjecttrackingviacontrastivesimilarity learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Meng, S., Shao, D., Guo, J., Gao, S., 2023. Tracking without label:Unsupervisedmultipleobjecttrackingviacontrastivesimilarity learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 16264–16273

    2023

  33. [41]

    Camouflaged object detection and tracking: A survey

    Mondal, A., 2020. Camouflaged object detection and tracking: A survey. International Journal of Image and Graphics 20, 2050028

    2020

  34. [42]

    Deepusps: Deep robust unsupervised saliency prediction via self-supervision

    Nguyen,T.,Dax,M.,Mummadi,C.K.,Ngo,N.,Nguyen,T.H.P.,Lou, Z., Brox, T., 2019. Deepusps: Deep robust unsupervised saliency prediction via self-supervision. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32

    2019

  35. [43]

    Zoominand out: A mixed-scale triplet network for camouflaged object detection, in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFConferenceoncomputervisionand pattern recognition, pp

    Pang,Y.,Zhao,X.,Xiang,T.Z.,Zhang,L.,Lu,H.,2022. Zoominand out: A mixed-scale triplet network for camouflaged object detection, in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFConferenceoncomputervisionand pattern recognition, pp. 2160–2170

    2022

  36. [44]

    Multi-scale interactive networkforsalientobjectdetection,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Pang, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, L., Lu, H., 2020. Multi-scale interactive networkforsalientobjectdetection,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 9413– 9422

    2020

  37. [45]

    Basnet: Boundary-aware salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Qin, X., Zhang, Z., Huang, C., Gao, C., Dehghan, M., Jagersand, M., 2019. Basnet: Boundary-aware salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 7479–7489

    2019

  38. [46]

    Shadow detection: A survey and comparative evaluation of recent methods

    Sanin, A., Sanderson, C., Lovell, B.C., 2012. Shadow detection: A survey and comparative evaluation of recent methods. Pattern recognition 45, 1684–1695

    2012

  39. [47]

    Hierarchical image saliency detection on extended cssd

    Shi, J., Yan, Q., Xu, L., Jia, J., 2015. Hierarchical image saliency detection on extended cssd. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 717–729

    2015

  40. [48]

    Unsupervised salient object de- tectionwithspectralclustervoting,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Shin, G., Albanie, S., Xie, W., 2022. Unsupervised salient object de- tectionwithspectralclustervoting,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3971– 3980

    2022

  41. [49]

    Siméoni,O.,Sekkat,C.,Puy,G.,Vobeck `y,A.,Zablocki,É.,Pérez,P.,

  42. [50]

    Siris,A.,Jiao,J.,Tam,G.K.,Xie,X.,Lau,R.W.,2021. Scenecontext- aware salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Yi Liu et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 12 of 13 international conference on computer vision, pp. 4156–4166

    2021

  43. [51]

    Animal camouflage analysis: Chameleon database

    Skurowski,P.,Abdulameer,H.,Błaszczyk,J.,Depta,T.,Kornacki,A., Kozieł, P., 2018. Animal camouflage analysis: Chameleon database. Unpublished manuscript 2, 7

    2018

  44. [52]

    3176–3186

    Unsupervised object localization: Observing the background to discover objects, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3176–3186

  45. [53]

    Contrastive boundary learning for point cloud segmentation, in: Proceedings of theIEEE/CVFConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecogni- tion, pp

    Tang, L., Zhan, Y., Chen, Z., Yu, B., Tao, D., 2022. Contrastive boundary learning for point cloud segmentation, in: Proceedings of theIEEE/CVFConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecogni- tion, pp. 8489–8499

    2022

  46. [54]

    Modeling the distri- butional uncertainty for salient object detection models, in: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tian, X., Zhang, J., Xiang, M., Dai, Y., 2023. Modeling the distri- butional uncertainty for salient object detection models, in: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 19660–19670

    2023

  47. [55]

    Msfanet: A light weight object detector based on context aggregation and at- tention mechanismfor autonomousmining truck

    Song, R., Ai, Y., Tian, B., Chen, L., Zhu, F., Fei, Y., 2022. Msfanet: A light weight object detector based on context aggregation and at- tention mechanismfor autonomousmining truck. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

    2022

  48. [56]

    Salient object detection in the deep learning era: An in-depth survey

    Wang, W., Lai, Q., Fu, H., Shen, J., Ling, H., Yang, R., 2021. Salient object detection in the deep learning era: An in-depth survey. IEEE TransactionsonPatternAnalysisandMachineIntelligence44,3239– 3259

    2021

  49. [57]

    Salientobjectdetection drivenbyfixationprediction,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEEconference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Wang,W.,Shen,J.,Dong,X.,Borji,A.,2018. Salientobjectdetection drivenbyfixationprediction,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEEconference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 1711–1720

    2018

  50. [58]

    Wang, L., Lu, H., Wang, Y., Feng, M., Wang, D., Yin, B., Ruan, X.,

  51. [59]

    Self-supervised transformers for unsupervised object discovery using normalized cut, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF ConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition,pp.14543– 14553

    Wang, Y., Shen, X., Hu, S.X., Yuan, Y., Crowley, J.L., Vaufreydaz, D., 2022b. Self-supervised transformers for unsupervised object discovery using normalized cut, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF ConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition,pp.14543– 14553

  52. [60]

    Multi- source uncertainty mining for deep unsupervised saliency detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Wang, L., Liu, T., Lu, H., 2022c. Multi- source uncertainty mining for deep unsupervised saliency detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11727–11736

  53. [61]

    Image qualityassessment:fromerrorvisibilitytostructuralsimilarity

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., 2004. Image qualityassessment:fromerrorvisibilitytostructuralsimilarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13, 600–612

    2004

  54. [62]

    Contrastmask: Contrastive learning to segment every thing, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Wang, X., Zhao, K., Zhang, R., Ding, S., Wang, Y., Shen, W., 2022a. Contrastmask: Contrastive learning to segment every thing, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11604–11613

  55. [63]

    Pixel is all you need: adversarial trajectory-ensemble active learning for salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp

    Wu,Z.,Wang,L.,Wang,W.,Xia,Q.,Chen,C.,Hao,A.,Li,S.,2023. Pixel is all you need: adversarial trajectory-ensemble active learning for salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2883–2891

    2023

  56. [64]

    Deeplesion: automated mining of large-scale lesion annotations and universal lesion detection with deep learning

    Yan, K., Wang, X., Lu, L., Summers, R.M., 2018. Deeplesion: automated mining of large-scale lesion annotations and universal lesion detection with deep learning. Journal of medical imaging 5, 036501–036501

    2018

  57. [65]

    Saliency detection via graph-based manifold ranking, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Yang, C., Zhang, L., Lu, H., Ruan, X., Yang, M.H., 2013. Saliency detection via graph-based manifold ranking, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3166–3173

    2013

  58. [66]

    Cascadedpartialdecoderforfastand accurate salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Wu,Z.,Su,L.,Huang,Q.,2019. Cascadedpartialdecoderforfastand accurate salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 3907– 3916

    2019

  59. [67]

    Mutualgraphlearningforcamouflagedobjectdetection,in:Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhai, Q., Li, X., Yang, F., Chen, C., Cheng, H., Fan, D.P., 2021. Mutualgraphlearningforcamouflagedobjectdetection,in:Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12997–13007

    2021

  60. [68]

    Supervision by fusion: Towards unsupervisedlearningofdeepsalientobjectdetector,in:Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp

    Zhang, D., Han, J., Zhang, Y., 2017. Supervision by fusion: Towards unsupervisedlearningofdeepsalientobjectdetector,in:Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 4048– 4056

    2017

  61. [69]

    Exploiting surroundedness for saliency detection: a boolean map approach

    Zhang, J., Sclaroff, S., 2015. Exploiting surroundedness for saliency detection: a boolean map approach. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 38, 889–902

    2015

  62. [70]

    Salience-awarefacepresentation attack detection via deep reinforcement learning

    Yu,B.,Lu,J.,Li,X.,Zhou,J.,2021. Salience-awarefacepresentation attack detection via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 17, 413–427

    2021

  63. [71]

    Learninggenerativevision transformer with energy-based latent space for saliency prediction

    Zhang,J.,Xie,J.,Barnes,N.,Li,P.,2021. Learninggenerativevision transformer with energy-based latent space for saliency prediction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 15448– 15463

    2021

  64. [72]

    Deep unsupervised saliency detection: A multiple noisy labeling perspec- tive, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Zhang, J., Zhang, T., Dai, Y., Harandi, M., Hartley, R., 2018. Deep unsupervised saliency detection: A multiple noisy labeling perspec- tive, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 9029–9038

    2018

  65. [73]

    Enhanced few-shot malware traffic classi- fication via integrating knowledge transfer with neural architecture search

    Zhang, X., Wang, Q., Qin, M., Wang, Y., Ohtsuki, T., Adebisi, B., Sari, H., Gui, G., 2024. Enhanced few-shot malware traffic classi- fication via integrating knowledge transfer with neural architecture search. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

    2024

  66. [74]

    Minimum barrier salient object detection at 80 fps, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp

    Zhang, J., Sclaroff, S., Lin, Z., Shen, X., Price, B., Mech, R., 2015. Minimum barrier salient object detection at 80 fps, in: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 1404– 1412

    2015

  67. [75]

    Unsupervised camouflaged object seg- mentation as domain adaptation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zhang, Y., Wu, C., 2023. Unsupervised camouflaged object seg- mentation as domain adaptation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4334–4344

    2023

  68. [76]

    Zhao, J.X., Liu, J.J., Fan, D.P., Cao, Y., Yang, J., Cheng, M.M.,

  69. [77]

    Saliency detection by multi-context deep learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp

    Zhao, R., Ouyang, W., Li, H., Wang, X., 2015. Saliency detection by multi-context deep learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 1265–1274

    2015

  70. [78]

    Clamp: Prompt-based contrastive learning for connecting language and animal pose, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhang, X., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., Tao, D., 2023. Clamp: Prompt-based contrastive learning for connecting language and animal pose, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 23272–23281

    2023

  71. [79]

    Detect- ing camouflaged object in frequency domain, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVFConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition, pp

    Zhong,Y.,Li,B.,Tang,L.,Kuang,S.,Wu,S.,Ding,S.,2022. Detect- ing camouflaged object in frequency domain, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVFConferenceonComputerVisionandPatternRecognition, pp. 4504–4513

    2022

  72. [80]

    Activation to saliency: Forming high-quality labels for unsupervised salient object detection

    Zhou, H., Chen, P., Yang, L., Xie, X., Lai, J., 2022. Activation to saliency: Forming high-quality labels for unsupervised salient object detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 33, 743–755

    2022

  73. [81]

    Texture- guidedsaliencydistillingforunsupervisedsalientobjectdetection,in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhou, H., Qiao, B., Yang, L., Lai, J., Xie, X., 2023. Texture- guidedsaliencydistillingforunsupervisedsalientobjectdetection,in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7257–7267

    2023

  74. [82]

    Interactive two-stream decoder for accurate and fast saliency detection, in: Pro- ceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFconferenceoncomputervisionandpattern recognition, pp

    Zhou, H., Xie, X., Lai, J.H., Chen, Z., Yang, L., 2020. Interactive two-stream decoder for accurate and fast saliency detection, in: Pro- ceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFconferenceoncomputervisionandpattern recognition, pp. 9141–9150. Yi Liu et al.:Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 13 of 13

    2020

  75. [83]

    Contrastive learning for label efficient se- manticsegmentation,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFInternational Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zhao, X., Vemulapalli, R., Mansfield, P.A., Gong, B., Green, B., Shapira, L., Wu, Y., 2021. Contrastive learning for label efficient se- manticsegmentation,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFInternational Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10623–10633

    2021

  76. [2010]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 353–367

    Learning to detect a salient object. IEEE Transactions on Pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 353–367

  77. [2017]

    Learningtodetectsalientobjectswithimage-levelsupervision, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 136–145

  78. [2019]

    8779–8788

    Egnet: Edge guidance network for salient object detection, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp. 8779–8788

  79. [2023]

    22046–22055

    Camouflaged object detection with feature decomposition and edgereconstruction,in:ProceedingsoftheIEEE/CVFConferenceon Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22046–22055

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.