Three-dimensional spin susceptibility in Ba$_{0.75}$K$_{0.25}$Fe$_{2}$As$_{2}$: Out-of-plane modulation revealed by neutron spectroscopy and theoretical modeling

Katsuhiro Suzuki; Maiko Kofu; Masamichi Nakajima; Naoki Murai; Ryoichi Kajimoto; Seiko Ohira-Kawamura; Yasuhiro Inamura

arxiv: 2412.16870 · v2 · submitted 2024-12-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Three-dimensional spin susceptibility in Ba_(0.75)K_(0.25)Fe₂As₂: Out-of-plane modulation revealed by neutron spectroscopy and theoretical modeling

Naoki Murai , Katsuhiro Suzuki , Masamichi Nakajima , Maiko Kofu , Seiko Ohira-Kawamura , Yasuhiro Inamura , Ryoichi Kajimoto This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 07:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

keywords spin susceptibilityneutron scatteringiron-based superconductordensity functional theoryantiferromagnetic orderthree-dimensional spin dynamicsFermi surface nesting

0 comments

The pith

A realistic three-dimensional electronic band structure from DFT reproduces the out-of-plane modulation of spin susceptibility observed in neutron scattering on Ba0.75K0.25Fe2As2.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines inelastic neutron scattering with density-functional-theory modeling to show that spin fluctuations in this doped iron pnictide are three-dimensional at low energies. The measured magnetic intensity displays a clear out-of-plane modulation that weakens with increasing energy, crossing over toward two-dimensional behavior. Calculations that feed the full three-dimensional DFT band structure into the spin susceptibility reproduce both the modulation and its energy evolution, and place a maximum at the experimental antiferromagnetic wavevector. The match occurs only when states well away from the Fermi level are retained, indicating that Fermi-surface nesting alone does not control the out-of-plane instability.

Core claim

Incorporating the realistic three-dimensional electronic band structure derived from density functional theory reproduces the experimentally observed out-of-plane modulation of the spin susceptibility at low energies and its gradual evolution into a more two-dimensional profile at higher energies; the calculated susceptibility peaks at the ordering wavevector q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1), and electronic states away from the Fermi level are essential for forming this peak.

What carries the argument

Realistic three-dimensional electronic band structure obtained from density functional theory, used as input to compute the dynamical spin susceptibility.

If this is right

The out-of-plane antiferromagnetic instability is driven by the full three-dimensional band structure rather than Fermi-surface nesting.
Spin dynamics exhibit a measurable energy-dependent crossover from three- to two-dimensional character.
States distant from the Fermi level must be retained to obtain the correct ordering wavevector.
The DFT-derived model provides a validated starting point for material-specific calculations of magnetic instabilities in related compounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar three-dimensional effects may appear in other iron-based superconductors whose band structures also deviate from strict two-dimensionality.
Pressure or doping studies that alter interlayer hopping could shift the energy scale of the three-to-two-dimensional crossover.
Calculations that truncate the band structure near the Fermi level will systematically underestimate the tendency toward out-of-plane order.

Load-bearing premise

The three-dimensional electronic band structure taken directly from density functional theory is sufficient to reproduce the measured spin susceptibility without further adjustments.

What would settle it

A susceptibility calculation performed with only states near the Fermi level that fails to produce a peak at q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1), or neutron data showing no out-of-plane modulation at low energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16870 by Katsuhiro Suzuki, Maiko Kofu, Masamichi Nakajima, Naoki Murai, Ryoichi Kajimoto, Seiko Ohira-Kawamura, Yasuhiro Inamura.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) A 3D density map of magnetic scattering inten [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Temperature dependence of magnetic scattering in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Constant-energy map of the RPA spin suscep [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a combined experimental and theoretical investigation of the spin dynamics in the iron-based superconductor Ba$_{0.75}$K$_{0.25}$Fe$_2$As$_2$. Time-of-flight inelastic neutron scattering measurements reveal the three-dimensional (3D) nature of the spin fluctuations, manifested as out-of-plane modulations of the low-energy magnetic intensity. As the energy increases, this 3D-like modulation gradually fades away, leading to a more two-dimensional (2D) profile -- a clear signature of a 3D-to-2D crossover in the spin dynamics. By incorporating a realistic 3D electronic band structure derived from density functional theory (DFT), we reproduce the experimentally observed features of the spin susceptibility, including the pronounced out-of-plane modulation at low energies and its gradual evolution into a more 2D character at higher energies. The calculated susceptibility exhibits a peak at the experimental ordering wavevector $\mathbf{q}_{\mathrm{AFM}} = (0.5, 0.5, 1)$, demonstrating that the DFT-derived 3D model accurately captures the tendency toward out-of-plane antiferromagnetic (AFM) order. Notably, electronic states away from the Fermi level play a crucial role in shaping the susceptibility peak at $\mathbf{q}_{\mathrm{AFM}}$, highlighting the limitations of the Fermi surface nesting picture in explaining the out-of-plane AFM instability. The demonstrated agreement between experiment and theory serves as a benchmark for validating the DFT-derived model as a realistic description of the material-specific electronic structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New neutron data map an energy-dependent 3D-to-2D crossover in spin fluctuations for this doped pnictide, and DFT reproduces the pattern with a peak at the observed wavevector, but the match is only qualitative and robustness checks are missing.

read the letter

The paper reports fresh time-of-flight inelastic neutron scattering on Ba0.75K0.25Fe2As2 that shows clear out-of-plane modulation at low energies fading toward a more 2D profile at higher energies. Their DFT calculation of the spin susceptibility reproduces this crossover and places a peak at the experimental q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1), with the added point that states away from the Fermi level help shape the peak and limit the usefulness of simple nesting arguments. That combination of new data and a direct 3D band-structure comparison is the useful part. The experiment maps the modulation in a straightforward way, and the theory uses a realistic 3D electronic structure rather than a 2D approximation, which is an improvement over many earlier studies. The agreement is presented as a benchmark for the material-specific model. The soft spot is that everything stays at the level of qualitative reproduction. The abstract gives no numbers on peak positions, widths, or intensity ratios, and there is no discussion of how the result changes with different DFT functionals, k-meshes, or any effective mass renormalization. In iron pnictides the out-of-plane dispersion and Stoner factor are known to be sensitive to those choices, so the claim that the bare DFT model accurately captures the tendency is not yet strongly supported. The stress-test concern about possible implicit adjustments is on target until the full text shows explicit tests. This work is aimed at people who follow spin fluctuations and pairing mechanisms in the pnictides. A reader who wants concrete 3D data on this specific doping level and a side-by-side theory comparison will get something from it. It has enough new experimental content and a grounded theoretical exercise to deserve serious referee time, though the authors will likely need to add quantitative metrics and parameter-sensitivity checks. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-of-flight inelastic neutron scattering on Ba$_{0.75}$K$_{0.25}$Fe$_2$As$_2$ that reveals out-of-plane modulations in low-energy spin fluctuations, which evolve toward a more two-dimensional character at higher energies. A susceptibility calculation based on a realistic 3D DFT-derived electronic band structure is shown to reproduce these features, including a peak at the experimental AFM wavevector q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1), with the additional claim that states away from the Fermi level are essential and that the Fermi-surface nesting picture is insufficient.

Significance. If the susceptibility calculation is confirmed to use the bare DFT bands without renormalization or tuned interactions, the work supplies a material-specific benchmark for 3D spin dynamics in iron pnictides and supplies concrete evidence that non-Fermi-level states control the out-of-plane AFM instability.

major comments (1)

[Theoretical modeling section] Theoretical modeling section (and associated figures): the central claim that the DFT-derived 3D model 'accurately captures the tendency toward out-of-plane antiferromagnetic order' without post-hoc adjustments requires explicit documentation that no band renormalization, k-mesh adjustment, or choice of U/J was used to place the susceptibility peak at q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1). The present description leaves open the possibility that implicit tuning affects the reported importance of states away from the Fermi level.

minor comments (2)

The susceptibility calculation method (RPA or other approximation, treatment of local interactions) should be stated with equation numbers in the theory section so that the parameter-free character can be verified.
Quantitative metrics (e.g., integrated intensity ratios or point-by-point residuals) comparing the calculated and measured energy-dependent 3D-to-2D crossover should be added to the relevant figure or table.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for greater clarity in the theoretical modeling section. We address the single major comment below and will make the requested revisions to improve transparency.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Theoretical modeling section] Theoretical modeling section (and associated figures): the central claim that the DFT-derived 3D model 'accurately captures the tendency toward out-of-plane antiferromagnetic order' without post-hoc adjustments requires explicit documentation that no band renormalization, k-mesh adjustment, or choice of U/J was used to place the susceptibility peak at q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1). The present description leaves open the possibility that implicit tuning affects the reported importance of states away from the Fermi level.

Authors: The calculations employed the bare DFT electronic band structure obtained from standard density-functional theory without band renormalization, without special adjustments to the k-mesh beyond routine convergence checks, and without any Hubbard U or Hund's J parameters. The susceptibility peak at q_AFM = (0.5, 0.5, 1) arises directly from this untuned 3D band structure. We agree that the current text does not state these facts with sufficient explicitness. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the theoretical modeling section (and a corresponding methods subsection) that lists the precise DFT settings, confirms the absence of renormalization or interaction tuning, and reiterates that the out-of-plane modulation is obtained from the raw DFT bands. This change will remove any ambiguity and reinforce the conclusion that non-Fermi-surface states are responsible for the observed feature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper obtains the 3D band structure from standard DFT calculations (independent of the neutron data) and inserts it into a susceptibility computation to obtain the q_AFM peak and 3D-to-2D crossover as outputs. No parameters are reported as fitted to the experimental intensities or wavevector; the match is presented as validation rather than a forced reproduction. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked to justify the central result. The chain therefore does not reduce by construction to its inputs and remains externally falsifiable against the neutron spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract, no explicit free parameters or invented entities are mentioned; the model relies on standard DFT assumptions.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Density functional theory provides a realistic 3D electronic band structure for the material
Invoked to model the spin susceptibility from first principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5863 in / 1258 out tokens · 36586 ms · 2026-05-23T07:26:11.211051+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

[1]

The color code represents the orbital character projected onto the Fermi surface

direction. The color code represents the orbital character projected onto the Fermi surface. Panels (d) and (e) show the experimental and theoretical spin susceptibilities at ω = 10 meV, respectively. The measurements were performed with an incident neutron energy of Ei = 31.3 meV at T = 30 K. Note that panels (d) and (e) use different intensity scales in...

work page
[2]

Kamihara, T

Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008)

work page 2008
[3]

Ishida, Y

K. Ishida, Y. Nakai, and H. Hosono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 062001 (2009)

work page 2009
[4]

Paglione and R

J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, Nat. Phys. 6, 645 (2010)

work page 2010
[5]

P. J. Hirschfeld, M. M. Korshunov, and I. I. Mazin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124508 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

Chubukov and P

A. Chubukov and P. J. Hirschfeld, Phys. Today 68, 46 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

P. J. Hirschfeld, C. R. Phys. 17, 197 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Nature 601, 35 (2022)

work page 2022
[9]

Miyake, S

K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6554 (1986)

work page 1986
[10]

D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 34, 8190 (1986)

work page 1986
[11]

Monthoux, A

P. Monthoux, A. V. Balatsky, and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3448 (1991)

work page 1991
[12]

I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, and M. H. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057003 (2008)

work page 2008
[13]

Kuroki, S

K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Usui, Y. Tanaka, H. Kontani, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087004 (2008)

work page 2008
[14]

Kuroki, H

K. Kuroki, H. Usui, S. Onari, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 79, 224511 (2009)

work page 2009
[15]

Graser, T

S. Graser, T. A. Maier, P. J. Hirschfeld, and D. J. Scalapino, New J. Phys. 11, 025016 (2009)

work page 2009
[16]

Graser, A

S. Graser, A. F. Kemper, T. A. Maier, H.-P. Cheng, P. J. Hirschfeld, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214503 (2010)

work page 2010
[17]

Ikeda, R

H. Ikeda, R. Arita, and J. Kuneˇ s, Phys. Rev. B 81, 054502 (2010)

work page 2010
[18]

Suzuki, H

K. Suzuki, H. Usui, and K. Kuroki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 013710 (2011)

work page 2011
[19]

Suzuki, H

K. Suzuki, H. Usui, and K. Kuroki, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144514 (2011)

work page 2011
[20]

D. J. Scalapino, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012)

work page 2012
[21]

Marzari and D

N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

work page 1997
[22]

Souza, N

I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

work page 2001
[23]

Marzari, A

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012)

work page 2012
[24]

Ikeda, R

H. Ikeda, R. Arita, and J. Kuneˇ s, Phys. Rev. B 82, 024508 (2010)

work page 2010
[25]

Kaneshita and T

E. Kaneshita and T. Tohyama, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094441 (2010)

work page 2010
[26]

H. Park, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 137007 (2011)

work page 2011
[27]

Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Nat. Phys. 10, 845 (2014)

work page 2014
[28]

P. Dai, J. Hu, and E. Dagotto, Nat. Phys. 8, 709 (2012)

work page 2012
[29]

J. M. Tranquada, G. Xu, and I. A. Zaliznyak, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 350, 148 (2014)

work page 2014
[30]

Dai, Rev

P. Dai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855 (2015)

work page 2015
[31]

D. S. Inosov, C. R. Phys. 17, 60 (2016)

work page 2016
[32]

Zhao, D.-X

J. Zhao, D.-X. Yao, S. Li, T. Hong, Y. Chen, S. Chang, W. Ratcliff, J. W. Lynn, H. A. Mook, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, E. W. Carlson, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167203 (2008)

work page 2008
[33]

R. J. McQueeney, S. O. Diallo, V. P. Antropov, G. D. Samolyuk, C. Broholm, N. Ni, S. Nandi, M. Yethiraj, J. L. Zarestky, J. J. Pulikkotil, A. Kreyssig, M. D. Lums- den, B. N. Harmon, P. C. Canfield, and A. I. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227205 (2008)

work page 2008
[34]

A. D. Christianson, E. A. Goremychkin, R. Osborn, S. Rosenkranz, M. D. Lumsden, C. D. Malliakas, I. S. Todorov, H. Claus, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, R. I. Bewley, and T. Guidi, Nature 456, 930 (2008)

work page 2008
[35]

R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, R. I. Bewley, T. Guidi, M. J. Pitcher, D. R. Parker, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 78, 220501 (2008)

work page 2008
[36]

Ishikado, R

M. Ishikado, R. Kajimoto, S.-i. Shamoto, M. Arai, A. Iyo, K. Miyazawa, P. M. Shirage, H. Kito, H. Eisaki, S. Kim, H. Hosono, T. Guidi, R. Bewley, and S. M. Ben- nington, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 043705 (2009)

work page 2009
[37]

A. D. Christianson, M. D. Lumsden, S. E. Nagler, G. J. MacDougall, M. A. McGuire, A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, B. C. Sales, and D. Mandrus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087002 (2009)

work page 2009
[38]

L. W. Harriger, A. Schneidewind, S. Li, J. Zhao, Z. Li, W. Lu, X. Dong, F. Zhou, Z. Zhao, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087005 (2009)

work page 2009
[39]

S. O. Diallo, V. P. Antropov, T. G. Perring, C. Bro- holm, J. J. Pulikkotil, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Can- field, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187206 (2009)

work page 2009
[40]

J. Zhao, D. T. Adroja, D.-X. Yao, R. Bewley, S. Li, X. F. Wang, G. Wu, X. H. Chen, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Nat. Phys. 5, 555 (2009)

work page 2009
[41]

Lester, J.-H

C. Lester, J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, T. G. Perring, I. R. Fisher, and S. M. Hayden, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064505 (2010)

work page 2010
[42]

D. S. Inosov, J. T. Park, P. Bourges, D. L. Sun, Y. Sidis, A. Schneidewind, K. Hradil, D. Haug, C. T. Lin, B. Keimer, and V. Hinkov, Nat. Phys. 6, 178 (2010). 7

work page 2010
[43]

S. O. Diallo, D. K. Pratt, R. M. Fernandes, W. Tian, J. L. Zarestky, M. Lumsden, T. G. Perring, C. L. Bro- holm, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, H.-F. Li, D. Vaknin, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. Mc- Queeney, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214407 (2010)

work page 2010
[44]

D. K. Pratt, A. Kreyssig, S. Nandi, N. Ni, A. Thaler, M. D. Lumsden, W. Tian, J. L. Zarestky, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 81, 140510 (2010)

work page 2010
[45]

M. Wang, H. Luo, J. Zhao, C. Zhang, M. Wang, K. Marty, S. Chi, J. W. Lynn, A. Schneidewind, S. Li, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 81, 174524 (2010)

work page 2010
[46]

J. T. Park, D. S. Inosov, A. Yaresko, S. Graser, D. L. Sun, P. Bourges, Y. Sidis, Y. Li, J.-H. Kim, D. Haug, A. Ivanov, K. Hradil, A. Schneidewind, P. Link, E. Faul- haber, I. Glavatskyy, C. T. Lin, B. Keimer, and V. Hinkov, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134503 (2010)

work page 2010
[47]

R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. Gillett, S. D. Das, S. E. Sebastian, A. E. Taylor, T. Guidi, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 83, 214519 (2011)

work page 2011
[48]

Zhang, M

C. Zhang, M. Wang, H. Luo, M. Wang, M. Liu, J. Zhao, D. L. Abernathy, T. A. Maier, K. Marty, M. D. Lums- den, S. Chi, S. Chang, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. W. Lynn, T. Xiang, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Sci. Rep. 1, 115 (2011)

work page 2011
[49]

Castellan, S

J.-P. Castellan, S. Rosenkranz, E. A. Goremychkin, D. Y. Chung, I. S. Todorov, M. G. Kanatzidis, I. Eremin, J. Knolle, A. V. Chubukov, S. Maiti, M. R. Norman, F. Weber, H. Claus, T. Guidi, R. I. Bewley, and R. Osborn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 177003 (2011)

work page 2011
[50]

L. W. Harriger, H. Q. Luo, M. S. Liu, C. Frost, J. P. Hu, M. R. Norman, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B84, 054544 (2011)

work page 2011
[51]

M. Liu, L. W. Harriger, H. Luo, M. Wang, R. A. Ewings, T. Guidi, H. Park, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, S. M. Hayden, and P. Dai, Nat. Phys. 8, 376 (2012)

work page 2012
[52]

G. S. Tucker, R. M. Fernandes, H.-F. Li, V. Thampy, N. Ni, D. L. Abernathy, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, D. Vaknin, J. Schmalian, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024505 (2012)

work page 2012
[53]

H. Luo, Z. Yamani, Y. Chen, X. Lu, M. Wang, S. Li, T. A. Maier, S. Danilkin, D. T. Adroja, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024508 (2012)

work page 2012
[54]

L. W. Harriger, M. Liu, H. Luo, R. A. Ewings, C. D. Frost, T. G. Perring, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 140403 (2012)

work page 2012
[55]

Iimura, S

S. Iimura, S. Matsuishi, M. Miyakawa, T. Taniguchi, K. Suzuki, H. Usui, K. Kuroki, R. Kajimoto, M. Naka- mura, Y. Inamura, K. Ikeuchi, S. Ji, and H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. B 88, 060501 (2013)

work page 2013
[56]

H. Luo, X. Lu, R. Zhang, M. Wang, E. A. Goremychkin, D. T. Adroja, S. Danilkin, G. Deng, Z. Yamani, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 88, 144516 (2013)

work page 2013
[57]

M. Wang, C. Zhang, X. Lu, G. Tan, H. Luo, Y. Song, M. Wang, X. Zhang, E. A. Goremychkin, T. G. Perring, T. A. Maier, Z. Yin, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Nat. Commun. 4, 2874 (2013)

work page 2013
[58]

G. S. Tucker, R. M. Fernandes, D. K. Pratt, A. Thaler, N. Ni, K. Marty, A. D. Christianson, M. D. Lumsden, B. C. Sales, A. S. Sefat, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 89, 180503 (2014)

work page 2014
[59]

Zhang, L

C. Zhang, L. W. Harriger, Z. Yin, W. Lv, M. Wang, G. Tan, Y. Song, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, T. Egami, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 217202 (2014)

work page 2014
[60]

X. Lu, J. T. Park, R. Zhang, H. Luo, A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Science 345, 657 (2014)

work page 2014
[61]

Qureshi, P

N. Qureshi, P. Steffens, D. Lamago, Y. Sidis, O. Sobolev, R. A. Ewings, L. Harnagea, S. Wurmehl, B. B¨ uchner, and M. Braden, Phys. Rev. B 90, 144503 (2014)

work page 2014
[62]

M. C. Rahn, R. A. Ewings, S. J. Sedlmaier, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 91, 180501 (2015)

work page 2015
[63]

Y. Song, X. Lu, D. L. Abernathy, D. W. Tam, J. L. Niedziela, W. Tian, H. Luo, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 92, 180504 (2015)

work page 2015
[64]

M. G. Kim, M. Wang, G. S. Tucker, P. N. Valdivia, D. L. Abernathy, S. Chi, A. D. Christianson, A. A. Aczel, T. Hong, T. W. Heitmann, S. Ran, P. C. Can- field, E. D. Bourret-Courchesne, A. Kreyssig, D. H. Lee, A. I. Goldman, R. J. McQueeney, and R. J. Birgeneau, Phys. Rev. B 92, 214404 (2015)

work page 2015
[65]

Q. Wang, Y. Shen, B. Pan, Y. Hao, M. Ma, F. Zhou, P. Steffens, K. Schmalzl, T. R. Forrest, M. Abdel-Hafiez, X. Chen, D. A. Chareev, A. N. Vasiliev, P. Bourges, Y. Sidis, H. Cao, and J. Zhao, Nat. Mater. 15, 159 (2016)

work page 2016
[66]

Y. Li, Z. Yin, X. Wang, D. W. Tam, D. L. Abernathy, A. Podlesnyak, C. Zhang, M. Wang, L. Xing, C. Jin, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, T. A. Maier, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247001 (2016)

work page 2016
[67]

Q. Wang, Y. Shen, B. Pan, X. Zhang, K. Ikeuchi, K. Iida, A. D. Christianson, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, M. Abdel-Hafiez, X. Chen, D. A. Chareev, A. N. Vasiliev, and J. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016)

work page 2016
[68]

D. Hu, Z. Yin, W. Zhang, R. A. Ewings, K. Ikeuchi, M. Nakamura, B. Roessli, Y. Wei, L. Zhao, G. Chen, S. Li, H. Luo, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094504 (2016)

work page 2016
[69]

T. Xie, D. Gong, H. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, M. Soda, T. Ma- suda, S. Itoh, F. Bourdarot, L.-P. Regnault, S. Danilkin, S. Li, and H. Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 137001 (2018)

work page 2018
[70]

Sapkota, P

A. Sapkota, P. Das, A. E. B¨ ohmer, B. G. Ueland, D. L. Abernathy, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174519 (2018)

work page 2018
[71]

Murai, K

N. Murai, K. Suzuki, S.-i. Ideta, M. Nakajima, K. Tanaka, H. Ikeda, and R. Kajimoto, Phys. Rev. B 97, 241112 (2018)

work page 2018
[72]

X. Lu, D. D. Scherer, D. W. Tam, W. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Luo, L. W. Harriger, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, B. M. Andersen, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067002 (2018)

work page 2018
[73]

J. Guo, L. Yue, K. Iida, K. Kamazawa, L. Chen, T. Han, Y. Zhang, and Y. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017001 (2019)

work page 2019
[74]

T. Chen, Y. Chen, A. Kreisel, X. Lu, A. Schneidewind, Y. Qiu, J. T. Park, T. G. Perring, J. R. Stewart, H. Cao, R. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Rong, Y. Wei, B. M. Andersen, P. J. Hirschfeld, C. Broholm, and P. Dai, Nat. Mater.18, 709 (2019)

work page 2019
[75]

Waßer, J

F. Waßer, J. T. Park, S. Aswartham, S. Wurmehl, Y. Sidis, P. Steffens, K. Schmalzl, B. B¨ uchner, and M. Braden, npj Quantum Materials 4, 59 (2019)

work page 2019
[76]

S. Shen, X. Zhang, H. Wo, Y. Shen, Y. Feng, A. Schnei- dewind, P. ˇCerm´ ak, W. Wang, and J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. 8 Lett. 124, 017001 (2020)

work page 2020
[77]

Nakajima, M

M. Nakajima, M. Nagafuchi, and S. Tajima, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094511 (2018)

work page 2018
[78]

Kajimoto, M

R. Kajimoto, M. Nakamura, Y. Inamura, F. Mizuno, K. Nakajima, S. Ohira-Kawamura, T. Yokoo, T. Nakatani, R. Maruyama, K. Soyama, K. Shi- bata, K. Suzuya, S. Sato, K. Aizawa, M. Arai, S. Wakimoto, M. Ishikado, S.-i. Shamoto, M. Fujita, H. Hiraka, K. Ohoyama, K. Yamada, and C.-H. Lee, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB025 (2011)

work page 2011
[79]

Nakamura, R

M. Nakamura, R. Kajimoto, Y. Inamura, F. Mizuno, M. Fujita, T. Yokoo, and M. Arai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 093002 (2009)

work page 2009
[80]

Nakajima, S

K. Nakajima, S. Ohira-Kawamura, T. Kikuchi, M. Nakamura, R. Kajimoto, Y. Inamura, N. Taka- hashi, K. Aizawa, K. Suzuya, K. Shibata, T. Nakatani, K. Soyama, R. Maruyama, H. Tanaka, W. Kam- bara, T. Iwahashi, Y. Itoh, T. Osakabe, S. Waki- moto, K. Kakurai, F. Maekawa, M. Harada, K. Oikawa, R. E. Lechner, F. Mezei, and M. Arai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB028 (2011)

work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.

[1] [1]

The color code represents the orbital character projected onto the Fermi surface

direction. The color code represents the orbital character projected onto the Fermi surface. Panels (d) and (e) show the experimental and theoretical spin susceptibilities at ω = 10 meV, respectively. The measurements were performed with an incident neutron energy of Ei = 31.3 meV at T = 30 K. Note that panels (d) and (e) use different intensity scales in...

work page

[2] [2]

Kamihara, T

Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008)

work page 2008

[3] [3]

Ishida, Y

K. Ishida, Y. Nakai, and H. Hosono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 062001 (2009)

work page 2009

[4] [4]

Paglione and R

J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, Nat. Phys. 6, 645 (2010)

work page 2010

[5] [5]

P. J. Hirschfeld, M. M. Korshunov, and I. I. Mazin, Rep. Prog. Phys. 74, 124508 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

Chubukov and P

A. Chubukov and P. J. Hirschfeld, Phys. Today 68, 46 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

P. J. Hirschfeld, C. R. Phys. 17, 197 (2016)

work page 2016

[8] [8]

R. M. Fernandes, A. I. Coldea, H. Ding, I. R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and G. Kotliar, Nature 601, 35 (2022)

work page 2022

[9] [9]

Miyake, S

K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6554 (1986)

work page 1986

[10] [10]

D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 34, 8190 (1986)

work page 1986

[11] [11]

Monthoux, A

P. Monthoux, A. V. Balatsky, and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3448 (1991)

work page 1991

[12] [12]

I. I. Mazin, D. J. Singh, M. D. Johannes, and M. H. Du, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 057003 (2008)

work page 2008

[13] [13]

Kuroki, S

K. Kuroki, S. Onari, R. Arita, H. Usui, Y. Tanaka, H. Kontani, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087004 (2008)

work page 2008

[14] [14]

Kuroki, H

K. Kuroki, H. Usui, S. Onari, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 79, 224511 (2009)

work page 2009

[15] [15]

Graser, T

S. Graser, T. A. Maier, P. J. Hirschfeld, and D. J. Scalapino, New J. Phys. 11, 025016 (2009)

work page 2009

[16] [16]

Graser, A

S. Graser, A. F. Kemper, T. A. Maier, H.-P. Cheng, P. J. Hirschfeld, and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214503 (2010)

work page 2010

[17] [17]

Ikeda, R

H. Ikeda, R. Arita, and J. Kuneˇ s, Phys. Rev. B 81, 054502 (2010)

work page 2010

[18] [18]

Suzuki, H

K. Suzuki, H. Usui, and K. Kuroki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 013710 (2011)

work page 2011

[19] [19]

Suzuki, H

K. Suzuki, H. Usui, and K. Kuroki, Phys. Rev. B 84, 144514 (2011)

work page 2011

[20] [20]

D. J. Scalapino, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012)

work page 2012

[21] [21]

Marzari and D

N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

work page 1997

[22] [22]

Souza, N

I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

work page 2001

[23] [23]

Marzari, A

N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419 (2012)

work page 2012

[24] [24]

Ikeda, R

H. Ikeda, R. Arita, and J. Kuneˇ s, Phys. Rev. B 82, 024508 (2010)

work page 2010

[25] [25]

Kaneshita and T

E. Kaneshita and T. Tohyama, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094441 (2010)

work page 2010

[26] [26]

H. Park, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 137007 (2011)

work page 2011

[27] [27]

Z. P. Yin, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Nat. Phys. 10, 845 (2014)

work page 2014

[28] [28]

P. Dai, J. Hu, and E. Dagotto, Nat. Phys. 8, 709 (2012)

work page 2012

[29] [29]

J. M. Tranquada, G. Xu, and I. A. Zaliznyak, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 350, 148 (2014)

work page 2014

[30] [30]

Dai, Rev

P. Dai, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855 (2015)

work page 2015

[31] [31]

D. S. Inosov, C. R. Phys. 17, 60 (2016)

work page 2016

[32] [32]

Zhao, D.-X

J. Zhao, D.-X. Yao, S. Li, T. Hong, Y. Chen, S. Chang, W. Ratcliff, J. W. Lynn, H. A. Mook, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, E. W. Carlson, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 167203 (2008)

work page 2008

[33] [33]

R. J. McQueeney, S. O. Diallo, V. P. Antropov, G. D. Samolyuk, C. Broholm, N. Ni, S. Nandi, M. Yethiraj, J. L. Zarestky, J. J. Pulikkotil, A. Kreyssig, M. D. Lums- den, B. N. Harmon, P. C. Canfield, and A. I. Goldman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227205 (2008)

work page 2008

[34] [34]

A. D. Christianson, E. A. Goremychkin, R. Osborn, S. Rosenkranz, M. D. Lumsden, C. D. Malliakas, I. S. Todorov, H. Claus, D. Y. Chung, M. G. Kanatzidis, R. I. Bewley, and T. Guidi, Nature 456, 930 (2008)

work page 2008

[35] [35]

R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, R. I. Bewley, T. Guidi, M. J. Pitcher, D. R. Parker, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 78, 220501 (2008)

work page 2008

[36] [36]

Ishikado, R

M. Ishikado, R. Kajimoto, S.-i. Shamoto, M. Arai, A. Iyo, K. Miyazawa, P. M. Shirage, H. Kito, H. Eisaki, S. Kim, H. Hosono, T. Guidi, R. Bewley, and S. M. Ben- nington, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 043705 (2009)

work page 2009

[37] [37]

A. D. Christianson, M. D. Lumsden, S. E. Nagler, G. J. MacDougall, M. A. McGuire, A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, B. C. Sales, and D. Mandrus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087002 (2009)

work page 2009

[38] [38]

L. W. Harriger, A. Schneidewind, S. Li, J. Zhao, Z. Li, W. Lu, X. Dong, F. Zhou, Z. Zhao, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 087005 (2009)

work page 2009

[39] [39]

S. O. Diallo, V. P. Antropov, T. G. Perring, C. Bro- holm, J. J. Pulikkotil, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Can- field, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 187206 (2009)

work page 2009

[40] [40]

J. Zhao, D. T. Adroja, D.-X. Yao, R. Bewley, S. Li, X. F. Wang, G. Wu, X. H. Chen, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Nat. Phys. 5, 555 (2009)

work page 2009

[41] [41]

Lester, J.-H

C. Lester, J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, T. G. Perring, I. R. Fisher, and S. M. Hayden, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064505 (2010)

work page 2010

[42] [42]

D. S. Inosov, J. T. Park, P. Bourges, D. L. Sun, Y. Sidis, A. Schneidewind, K. Hradil, D. Haug, C. T. Lin, B. Keimer, and V. Hinkov, Nat. Phys. 6, 178 (2010). 7

work page 2010

[43] [43]

S. O. Diallo, D. K. Pratt, R. M. Fernandes, W. Tian, J. L. Zarestky, M. Lumsden, T. G. Perring, C. L. Bro- holm, N. Ni, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, H.-F. Li, D. Vaknin, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. Mc- Queeney, Phys. Rev. B 81, 214407 (2010)

work page 2010

[44] [44]

D. K. Pratt, A. Kreyssig, S. Nandi, N. Ni, A. Thaler, M. D. Lumsden, W. Tian, J. L. Zarestky, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 81, 140510 (2010)

work page 2010

[45] [45]

M. Wang, H. Luo, J. Zhao, C. Zhang, M. Wang, K. Marty, S. Chi, J. W. Lynn, A. Schneidewind, S. Li, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 81, 174524 (2010)

work page 2010

[46] [46]

J. T. Park, D. S. Inosov, A. Yaresko, S. Graser, D. L. Sun, P. Bourges, Y. Sidis, Y. Li, J.-H. Kim, D. Haug, A. Ivanov, K. Hradil, A. Schneidewind, P. Link, E. Faul- haber, I. Glavatskyy, C. T. Lin, B. Keimer, and V. Hinkov, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134503 (2010)

work page 2010

[47] [47]

R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. Gillett, S. D. Das, S. E. Sebastian, A. E. Taylor, T. Guidi, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 83, 214519 (2011)

work page 2011

[48] [48]

Zhang, M

C. Zhang, M. Wang, H. Luo, M. Wang, M. Liu, J. Zhao, D. L. Abernathy, T. A. Maier, K. Marty, M. D. Lums- den, S. Chi, S. Chang, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. W. Lynn, T. Xiang, J. Hu, and P. Dai, Sci. Rep. 1, 115 (2011)

work page 2011

[49] [49]

Castellan, S

J.-P. Castellan, S. Rosenkranz, E. A. Goremychkin, D. Y. Chung, I. S. Todorov, M. G. Kanatzidis, I. Eremin, J. Knolle, A. V. Chubukov, S. Maiti, M. R. Norman, F. Weber, H. Claus, T. Guidi, R. I. Bewley, and R. Osborn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 177003 (2011)

work page 2011

[50] [50]

L. W. Harriger, H. Q. Luo, M. S. Liu, C. Frost, J. P. Hu, M. R. Norman, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B84, 054544 (2011)

work page 2011

[51] [51]

M. Liu, L. W. Harriger, H. Luo, M. Wang, R. A. Ewings, T. Guidi, H. Park, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, S. M. Hayden, and P. Dai, Nat. Phys. 8, 376 (2012)

work page 2012

[52] [52]

G. S. Tucker, R. M. Fernandes, H.-F. Li, V. Thampy, N. Ni, D. L. Abernathy, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, D. Vaknin, J. Schmalian, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024505 (2012)

work page 2012

[53] [53]

H. Luo, Z. Yamani, Y. Chen, X. Lu, M. Wang, S. Li, T. A. Maier, S. Danilkin, D. T. Adroja, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024508 (2012)

work page 2012

[54] [54]

L. W. Harriger, M. Liu, H. Luo, R. A. Ewings, C. D. Frost, T. G. Perring, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 140403 (2012)

work page 2012

[55] [55]

Iimura, S

S. Iimura, S. Matsuishi, M. Miyakawa, T. Taniguchi, K. Suzuki, H. Usui, K. Kuroki, R. Kajimoto, M. Naka- mura, Y. Inamura, K. Ikeuchi, S. Ji, and H. Hosono, Phys. Rev. B 88, 060501 (2013)

work page 2013

[56] [56]

H. Luo, X. Lu, R. Zhang, M. Wang, E. A. Goremychkin, D. T. Adroja, S. Danilkin, G. Deng, Z. Yamani, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 88, 144516 (2013)

work page 2013

[57] [57]

M. Wang, C. Zhang, X. Lu, G. Tan, H. Luo, Y. Song, M. Wang, X. Zhang, E. A. Goremychkin, T. G. Perring, T. A. Maier, Z. Yin, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Nat. Commun. 4, 2874 (2013)

work page 2013

[58] [58]

G. S. Tucker, R. M. Fernandes, D. K. Pratt, A. Thaler, N. Ni, K. Marty, A. D. Christianson, M. D. Lumsden, B. C. Sales, A. S. Sefat, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 89, 180503 (2014)

work page 2014

[59] [59]

Zhang, L

C. Zhang, L. W. Harriger, Z. Yin, W. Lv, M. Wang, G. Tan, Y. Song, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, T. Egami, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 217202 (2014)

work page 2014

[60] [60]

X. Lu, J. T. Park, R. Zhang, H. Luo, A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Science 345, 657 (2014)

work page 2014

[61] [61]

Qureshi, P

N. Qureshi, P. Steffens, D. Lamago, Y. Sidis, O. Sobolev, R. A. Ewings, L. Harnagea, S. Wurmehl, B. B¨ uchner, and M. Braden, Phys. Rev. B 90, 144503 (2014)

work page 2014

[62] [62]

M. C. Rahn, R. A. Ewings, S. J. Sedlmaier, S. J. Clarke, and A. T. Boothroyd, Phys. Rev. B 91, 180501 (2015)

work page 2015

[63] [63]

Y. Song, X. Lu, D. L. Abernathy, D. W. Tam, J. L. Niedziela, W. Tian, H. Luo, Q. Si, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 92, 180504 (2015)

work page 2015

[64] [64]

M. G. Kim, M. Wang, G. S. Tucker, P. N. Valdivia, D. L. Abernathy, S. Chi, A. D. Christianson, A. A. Aczel, T. Hong, T. W. Heitmann, S. Ran, P. C. Can- field, E. D. Bourret-Courchesne, A. Kreyssig, D. H. Lee, A. I. Goldman, R. J. McQueeney, and R. J. Birgeneau, Phys. Rev. B 92, 214404 (2015)

work page 2015

[65] [65]

Q. Wang, Y. Shen, B. Pan, Y. Hao, M. Ma, F. Zhou, P. Steffens, K. Schmalzl, T. R. Forrest, M. Abdel-Hafiez, X. Chen, D. A. Chareev, A. N. Vasiliev, P. Bourges, Y. Sidis, H. Cao, and J. Zhao, Nat. Mater. 15, 159 (2016)

work page 2016

[66] [66]

Y. Li, Z. Yin, X. Wang, D. W. Tam, D. L. Abernathy, A. Podlesnyak, C. Zhang, M. Wang, L. Xing, C. Jin, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, T. A. Maier, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 247001 (2016)

work page 2016

[67] [67]

Q. Wang, Y. Shen, B. Pan, X. Zhang, K. Ikeuchi, K. Iida, A. D. Christianson, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, M. Abdel-Hafiez, X. Chen, D. A. Chareev, A. N. Vasiliev, and J. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016)

work page 2016

[68] [68]

D. Hu, Z. Yin, W. Zhang, R. A. Ewings, K. Ikeuchi, M. Nakamura, B. Roessli, Y. Wei, L. Zhao, G. Chen, S. Li, H. Luo, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094504 (2016)

work page 2016

[69] [69]

T. Xie, D. Gong, H. Ghosh, A. Ghosh, M. Soda, T. Ma- suda, S. Itoh, F. Bourdarot, L.-P. Regnault, S. Danilkin, S. Li, and H. Luo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 137001 (2018)

work page 2018

[70] [70]

Sapkota, P

A. Sapkota, P. Das, A. E. B¨ ohmer, B. G. Ueland, D. L. Abernathy, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig, A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174519 (2018)

work page 2018

[71] [71]

Murai, K

N. Murai, K. Suzuki, S.-i. Ideta, M. Nakajima, K. Tanaka, H. Ikeda, and R. Kajimoto, Phys. Rev. B 97, 241112 (2018)

work page 2018

[72] [72]

X. Lu, D. D. Scherer, D. W. Tam, W. Zhang, R. Zhang, H. Luo, L. W. Harriger, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, B. M. Andersen, and P. Dai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067002 (2018)

work page 2018

[73] [73]

J. Guo, L. Yue, K. Iida, K. Kamazawa, L. Chen, T. Han, Y. Zhang, and Y. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 017001 (2019)

work page 2019

[74] [74]

T. Chen, Y. Chen, A. Kreisel, X. Lu, A. Schneidewind, Y. Qiu, J. T. Park, T. G. Perring, J. R. Stewart, H. Cao, R. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Rong, Y. Wei, B. M. Andersen, P. J. Hirschfeld, C. Broholm, and P. Dai, Nat. Mater.18, 709 (2019)

work page 2019

[75] [75]

Waßer, J

F. Waßer, J. T. Park, S. Aswartham, S. Wurmehl, Y. Sidis, P. Steffens, K. Schmalzl, B. B¨ uchner, and M. Braden, npj Quantum Materials 4, 59 (2019)

work page 2019

[76] [76]

S. Shen, X. Zhang, H. Wo, Y. Shen, Y. Feng, A. Schnei- dewind, P. ˇCerm´ ak, W. Wang, and J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. 8 Lett. 124, 017001 (2020)

work page 2020

[77] [77]

Nakajima, M

M. Nakajima, M. Nagafuchi, and S. Tajima, Phys. Rev. B 97, 094511 (2018)

work page 2018

[78] [78]

Kajimoto, M

R. Kajimoto, M. Nakamura, Y. Inamura, F. Mizuno, K. Nakajima, S. Ohira-Kawamura, T. Yokoo, T. Nakatani, R. Maruyama, K. Soyama, K. Shi- bata, K. Suzuya, S. Sato, K. Aizawa, M. Arai, S. Wakimoto, M. Ishikado, S.-i. Shamoto, M. Fujita, H. Hiraka, K. Ohoyama, K. Yamada, and C.-H. Lee, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB025 (2011)

work page 2011

[79] [79]

Nakamura, R

M. Nakamura, R. Kajimoto, Y. Inamura, F. Mizuno, M. Fujita, T. Yokoo, and M. Arai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 093002 (2009)

work page 2009

[80] [80]

Nakajima, S

K. Nakajima, S. Ohira-Kawamura, T. Kikuchi, M. Nakamura, R. Kajimoto, Y. Inamura, N. Taka- hashi, K. Aizawa, K. Suzuya, K. Shibata, T. Nakatani, K. Soyama, R. Maruyama, H. Tanaka, W. Kam- bara, T. Iwahashi, Y. Itoh, T. Osakabe, S. Waki- moto, K. Kakurai, F. Maekawa, M. Harada, K. Oikawa, R. E. Lechner, F. Mezei, and M. Arai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, SB028 (2011)

work page 2011