Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Investigation of Super-Poissonian Nonclassical Nature of Inflaton Field in Flat FRW Universe through Cosmological Mandels $Q$ Parameter

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the cosmological Mandel Q parameter is positive for squeezed number states and coherent squeezed number states of the inflaton in a flat FRW universe, which it interprets as super-Poissonian, nonclassical behavior.

desk verdict A self-consistent computation of Mandel Q for squeezed number states whose central claim—positive Q proves nonclassicality—is wrong; the formulas may survive, the interpretation does not. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17362 v2 pith:X4PLUJRW submitted 2024-12-23 gr-qc

Dhwani Gangal , Sudhava Yadav , K.K. Venkataratnam This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords MandelQparameterSqueezednumberstatesCoherentInflatonSuper-PoissonianstatisticsSub-PoissonianSemiclassicalgravityFlatFRWuniverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the inflaton field in a flat Friedmann–Robertson–Walker universe, prepared in squeezed number states (SNS) or coherent squeezed number states (CSNS), has a positive cosmological Mandel Q parameter. Over the tabulated parameter ranges, Q comes out positive for both state families, which the authors read as super-Poissonian particle-number statistics and hence a nonclassical signature of the inflaton. The interest for a general reader is that this gives a quantum-statistical handle on the early universe: the width of the inflaton's particle-number distribution, not just its mean, is predicted to be larger than Poisson. The calculation extends a familiar quantum-optical diagnostic, Mandel's Q, into a semiclassical-gravity cosmological setting.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the cosmological Mandel Q parameter, $Q = (\langle :\hat{N}^2(t): \rangle - \langle :\hat{N}(t): \rangle^2 - \langle :\hat{N}(t): \rangle)/\langle :\hat{N}(t): \rangle$, evaluated for states formed by acting on a number state $|n\rangle$ with the squeezing operator $\hat{W}(\rho,\Psi)$ and, for CSNS, the displacement $\hat{D}(\Upsilon)$. The computation's engine is the set of mode-function expansions of the field $\Phi$ and momentum $\Pi$, Eqs. (21)–(26), which convert fourth-order operator expectation values into products of $\Phi(t)$, $\Phi^*(t)$, $\Phi(t_0)$, $\Phi^*(t_0)$, and their time derivatives. When these are combined with the squeezed and displaced ladder-operator algebra, the expectation values collapse into Eqs. (51) and (59), each carrying the common prefactor $\frac{1}{4m^2}\left(1-\frac{1}{t\,t_0}\right)^2$. That factorization is what makes the sign of Q depend only on the state-dependent bracket, and it is why the tabulated positivity is stable across the scanned parameters.

What would settle it

Recompute Eqs. (47)–(50) with explicit mode-function solutions of the massive Klein–Gordon equation (6) in a flat FRW background and check whether the prefactor $\frac{1}{4m^2}\left(1-\frac{1}{t\,t_0}\right)^2$ and the positivity of the tabulated Q survive; if any permitted choice of mode functions yields negative Q for the same n, ρ, t, t0, the paper's central positivity claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a closed-form computation of the normal-ordered Mandel parameter for two families of nonclassical states. For SNS, Eq. (51) gives QSNS as a state-dependent bracket divided by a positive denominator, with a prefactor that is positive whenever t differs from t0; for CSNS, Eq. (59) has the same structure with additional dependence on the coherent displacement Υ. The numerical tables, covering number states n = 1 to 5, squeezing parameter 0.002 to 2, and Δt up to 5 with m = t0 = 1, show Q > 0 throughout, and the paper concludes that the inflaton displays super-Poissonian nonclassical nature in these states. In the n = 0 (or n = Υ = 0) limit the formulas reduce to the squeezed-vacuum case discussed in earlier work, where the sign flips to sub-Poissonian, which the authors cite as consistency of the formulation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is an unstated choice of mode functions $\Phi(t)$, $\Phi(t_0)$, and scale factor $G(t)$ that turns the operator expressions into the closed prefactor; the paper only says 'using Eqs. (18–26, 33–34)' and cites its own earlier work, without writing the mode functions down, and a different legitimate choice could change the sign and magnitude of Q.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For squeezed number states and coherent squeezed number states of the massive inflaton, the cosmological Mandel Q parameter is positive over the scanned ranges of squeezing, number state, and time, meaning the particle-number distribution is wider than Poisson (super-Poissonian).
  • Q increases with the squeezing parameter ρ, the state number n, and the elapsed time Δt, so the super-Poissonian character becomes more pronounced as these parameters grow.
  • Setting n = 0 (or n = Υ = 0) reduces the formulas to the squeezed-vacuum Mandel Q from earlier work, where the character shifts from super-Poissonian to sub-Poissonian, providing a consistency check the paper relies on.
  • In the semiclassical-gravity picture, the inflaton's number statistics are therefore quantum-mechanical in a way that a classical Poisson description would miss, with consequences for how particle production and density fluctuations are modeled in the early universe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: positivity of the Mandel Q parameter is not by itself a rigorous nonclassicality witness, because super-Poissonian statistics can also arise from classical stochastic mixtures; the paper's identification of Q > 0 with nonclassicality inherits a quantum-optics criterion that would need a separate argument in curved spacetime.
  • Editorial extension: the explicit mode functions are never displayed, so the cleanest check of the result is to test whether the same positivity is obtained with other standard vacuum choices; if it is, the claim is robust, and if not, the result is tied to one particular quantization.
  • Editorial extension: a testable next step is to connect the number-statistics parameter to curvature perturbations or the power spectrum, so that the predicted super-Poissonian behavior could in principle be compared with observable cosmological statistics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper computes a cosmological version of Mandel's Q parameter for squeezed number states (SNS) and coherent squeezed number states (CSNS) of a massive, minimally coupled inflaton in a flat FRW universe, working in semiclassical gravity. The authors derive closed-form expressions for Q in Eqs. (51) and (59), evaluate them numerically for n=1,...,5 (and for CSNS with the same range of n), and find all values positive. They then conclude, in the abstract and in Section 6, that positive Q demonstrates the 'super-Poissonian non-classical nature' of the inflaton. The paper also states that the n=0 (or n=0, coherent parameter zero) limit yields a squeezed vacuum with sub-Poissonian behavior.

Significance. If the central claim were valid, the paper would provide a concrete example of a quantum-optical statistical measure evaluated for nonclassical states in an expanding background, and the explicit final formulas in Eqs. (51) and (59) would allow quantitative study of particle-number fluctuations in SNS and CSNS during inflation. The algebraic expressions are displayed in enough detail that the numerical tables can be spot-checked, and the final formulas contain no fitted parameters; these are genuine strengths. However, the central inference that Q>0 is evidence of nonclassicality is not correct: positive Q is super-Poissonian statistics but is compatible with classical states. The derivation also depends on mode functions that are never specified in this manuscript. These two issues are load-bearing, so the physical conclusion that the inflaton is nonclassical is not supported by the calculation even if the algebra is internally consistent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 (after Eq. (36)) and Abstract] The central claim is that positive Mandel Q shows 'super-Poissonian non-classical nature' and that both sub-Poissonian and super-Poissonian distributions 'can't be obtained from any classical states.' This is incorrect. Mandel's Q is a one-sided nonclassicality witness: only Q<0 (sub-Poissonian statistics) is sufficient for nonclassicality; Q>0 can occur for classical states. For example, a thermal state with mean occupation nbar has Var(N)=nbar(nbar+1), hence Q=nbar>0, and yet it is a classical mixture of coherent states with a positive P function. Therefore the positive values in Tables 1-10 do not establish the nonclassical nature of the inflaton, regardless of the correctness of the algebra in Eqs. (51) and (59).
  2. [Section 5.1, Eq. (51), and Section 5.2, Eq. (59)] The paper states that setting n=0 in Eq. (51) converts the result to that for a squeezed vacuum and that the 'nature of evaluation changes from super-Poissonian non-classical nature to sub-Poissonian non-classical nature.' This is contradicted by the displayed formula. At n=0 the numerator of Eq. (51) is 2 + 8sinh^4(rho) + 8cosh^2(rho)sinh^2(rho) + 16cosh(rho)sinh^3(rho) + 8cosh(rho)sinh(rho) + 8sinh^2(rho), and the denominator is 2sinh^2(rho) + 2cosh(rho)sinh(rho) + 1, which is strictly positive for all rho>0. The analogous claim for Eq. (59) at Upsilon*=Upsilon=n=0 is likewise unsupported by the displayed expression. Unless the squeezed-vacuum limit is taken through a different substitution than the one stated, the claimed sign change to sub-Poissonian behavior does not follow.
  3. [Section 3 and Section 5.1, Eqs. (46)-(51)] The step from the operator expressions in Eqs. (45), (47), and (49) to the explicit prefactor (1/(4m^2 t^2 t0^2)) + (1/(4m^2)) - (1/(2m^2 t t0)) = (1/(4m^2))(1 - 1/(t t0))^2 is not shown in the manuscript and does not follow from Eqs. (18-26, 33-34) alone. This step requires specific mode functions Phi(t), Phi(t0), and a specific scale factor G(t) (or R(t)) for the massive inflaton in flat FRW spacetime. These inputs are never written down; the paper only cites the authors' own preprints [21,87]. Because the sign and magnitude of Q in Tables 1-10 depend on this unstated input, the positivity result is not reproducible from the manuscript as written, and the central conclusion rests on a silent assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 and Section 5] The scale factor is denoted G(t) in Eqs. (3)-(7) but R appears in Eq. (39) and in the surrounding text; the notation should be unified throughout.
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript contains frequent typographical errors, including 'infalon' for 'inflaton' and 'compression' for 'comparison'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [Section 5, Figs. 1-14] In this version the figures are represented only by captions, with no visible plots or axis labels; the actual figures should be included so that the claimed monotonic growth of Q with rho, n, and t can be verified.
  4. [Section 5.2, Eq. (33)] Eq. (33) contains a mismatched parenthesis in the first line, and the placement of the factor (n+1/2) before sinh^2 rho is ambiguous; the expression should be rewritten with unambiguous bracketing.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The nonclassicality conclusion is imposed by the paper's own Q-based definition and by unstated self-cited mode functions, even though the Q algebra itself is not fitted.

  1. self definitional [Section 5, text following Eq. (36); Abstract]
    "Now when in Eq. (36) when Q = 0 i.e. <: (△N(t))2 :>=<: N(t) :> the corresponding state will demonstrate the classical nature otherwise it will show the non-classical cosmological nature [50, 64]. Here also when ... for positive values of Mandel’s Q Parameter the behaviour of states is super-Poissonian non-classical. For both sub-Poissonian and super-Poissonian non-classical states, mathematical distribution can’t be obtained from any classical states."

    The central claim that positive Q demonstrates nonclassicality is not derived from an external nonclassicality criterion; it is stipulated by the paper's own classification, which declares Q=0 classical and every nonzero Q nonclassical, with Q>0 labeled 'super-Poissonian non-classical'. The Abstract's conclusion that positive Q 'shows the super-Poissonian non-classical nature of inflaton' is therefore a restatement of that classification by construction. With the standard Mandel criterion, Q<0 is a sufficient nonclassicality witness while Q>0 is inconclusive (thermal states have Q>0), so the paper's definition is doing the logical work.

  2. self citation load bearing [Sections 3-5, Eqs. (21)-(22), (33)-(34), (37), and their use in Eqs. (46)-(51), (54)-(59)]
    "Here creation and annihilation operators can be computed as [21, 87] ... using Eqs. (12-13, 18-30), we get : Π2 : for CSNS as [21, 87] ... the value of <: e†e :> SNS can be further computed using Using Eqs. (18-26, 33-34) in Eq. (47)"

    The time-dependent prefactor (1/(4m^2))(1 - 1/(t t0))^2 that fixes the sign and magnitude of Q in Eqs. (48), (51), (56), and (59) is never derived in this paper from written mode functions; it enters through operator definitions and normal-ordered expectation values imported with the author-overlapping citations [21, 87]. The paper states only 'using Eqs. (18-26, 33-34)' and does not specify Phi(t), Phi*(t), or G(t), so the computed positivity rests on a silent, self-cited mode-function ansatz. This makes the self-citation load-bearing rather than independent support.

full rationale

The derivation is not a data fit, and the squeezed-state algebra leading to Mandel's Q has independent textbook content; however, the paper's central inference has two circularity-relevant features. First, Section 5 defines nonclassicality as any nonzero Q, so the Abstract's conclusion that positive Q implies nonclassicality is a tautology of that classification rather than a derived result; the standard Mandel criterion is one-sided, and positive Q is compatible with classical states such as thermal states. Second, the explicit mode-function factor controlling the sign of Q is inherited without being stated from the authors' own preprints [21, 87], so the computed positivity is not independently grounded. There is also an internal inconsistency, not itself a circularity: Section 5.1 claims that setting n=0 in Eq. (51) changes the behavior to sub-Poissonian, but Eq. (51) with n=0 and rho>0 still gives positive Q, contradicting the paper's own classification. Overall, the 'prediction' of super-Poissonian nonclassicality reduces by construction to the paper's definition and to an unverified self-citation chain, while the underlying Q calculation retains independent algebraic content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to observational data; the numerical tables fix m=1, t0=1, and for CSNS Upsilon*=Upsilon=1 for convenience. The central claim rests on four unproved inputs: semiclassical gravity, flat FRW with minimally coupled homogeneous scalar, specific mode functions inherited from self-cited formulas without derivation, and the nonstandard criterion that any nonzero Mandel Q is nonclassical. The last assumption is the most fragile because it is not true in standard quantum optics. The paper introduces no invented entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical Einstein equations with normal-ordered energy-momentum tensor (Eq. 1) are valid.
    The paper adopts SCTG throughout; it is not derived and is the framework for all subsequent expectation values.
  • domain assumption Flat FRW metric with homogeneous, minimally coupled massive scalar inflaton is the correct background.
    Metric (3) and Lagrangian (5) define the model; homogeneity, isotropy, flatness, and minimal coupling are assumed without justification.
  • domain assumption The unstated mode functions Phi(t), Phi(t0), and scale factor G(t) that yield the explicit factors in Eqs. (46) to (50) are the correct solutions for the massive inflaton.
    The text jumps from operator expressions to time-dependent factors with only 'using Eqs. (18-26, 33-34)' and self-cited refs [21,87]; these mode functions are load-bearing and not shown.
  • ad hoc to paper Positive Mandel Q parameter counts as evidence of nonclassicality.
    Section 5 states Q=0 is classical and any nonzero Q is nonclassical. In standard quantum optics only Q<0 is a direct nonclassical witness; positive Q can arise from classical thermal states. The paper's headline depends on this assumption.
  • standard math Canonical commutation relations and normal ordering for the inflaton mode operators.
    Eqs. (15) to (26) use standard ladder-operator algebra; accepted as background without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigation of Super-Poissonian Nonclassical Nature of Inflaton Field in Flat FRW Universe through Cosmological Mandels $Q$ Parameter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X4PLUJRW

@misc{pith2026241217362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigation of Super-Poissonian Nonclassical Nature of Inflaton Field in Flat FRW Universe through Cosmological Mandels $Q$ Parameter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X4PLUJRW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17362}
}
abstract

This study investigates the nonclassical properties of the inflaton field within the framework of semiclassical gravity by analyzing Cosmological Mandels $Q$ parameter for Squeezed Number States (SNS) and Coherent Squeezed Number States (CSNS). Mandels $Q$ parameter serves as a critical tool for identifying nonclassical states by differentiating between sub-Poissonian and super-Poissonian statistics. The values of Cosmological Mandels $Q$ are positive shows the super-Poissonian non-classical nature of inflaton for Squeezed Number States (SNS) and Coherent Squeezed Number States (CSNS). These results provide deeper insights into the statistical properties of quantum states in early-universe cosmology and emphasize the relevance of SNS and CSNS in understanding quantum effects on cosmic inflation and particle production.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Opitom, C

    Kubik, B., Karska, A. & Opitom, C. Origin of the universe and planetary systems (2022). URL https://books.rsc.org/books/edited-volume/2003/chapter/ 4583607/Origin-of-the-Universe-and-Planetary-Systems

    2022

  2. [2]

    & Moore, B

    Moore, B. & Moore, B. The big bang. Elephants in Space: The Past, Present and Future of Life and the Universe 43–55 (2014). URL https://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-05672-2 3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05672-2 2014

  3. [3]

    Guth, A. H. & Weinberg, E. J. Cosmological consequences of a first-order phase transition in the s u 5 grand unified model. Physical Review D 23, 876 (1981)

    1981

  4. [4]

    & Wallisch, B

    Green, D., Guo, Y. & Wallisch, B. Cosmological implications of axion-matter couplings. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022, 019 (2022). URL https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/019/meta

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/019/meta 2022

  5. [5]

    & Prokopec, T

    Albrecht, A., Ferreira, P., Joyce, M. & Prokopec, T. Inflation and squeezed quantum states. Physical Review D 50, 4807–4820 (1994). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.4807. 24 T able 7Numerical values of Mandel’s Q Parameter while n=2, t0 = 1 for various values of ρ and △t ρ △t = 0.1 △t = 0.2 △t = 0.3 △t = 0.4 △t = 0.5 △t = 1 △t = 5 0.002 0...

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.4807 1994

  6. [6]

    J., Turner, M

    Albrecht, A., Steinhardt, P. J., Turner, M. S. & Wilczek, F. Reheating an Inflationary Universe. Physical Review Letters 48, 1437–1440 (1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    & Starobinsky, A

    Kofman, L., Linde, A. & Starobinsky, A. A. Reheating after Inflation. Physical Review Letters 73, 3195–3198 (1994)

    1994

  8. [8]

    & Mazumdar, A

    Allahverdi, R., Brandenberger, R., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y. & Mazumdar, A. Reheating in Inflationary Cosmology: Theory and Applications. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 60, 27–51 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    L., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Easson, D

    Cook, J. L., Dimastrogiovanni, E., Easson, D. A. & Krauss, L. M. Reheating pre- dictions in single field inflation. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015, 047 (2015). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/047

    2015 doi

  2. [10]

    & Ringeval, C

    Martin, J. & Ringeval, C. First cmb constraints on the inflationary reheating temperature. Physical Review D 82, 023511 (2010). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.023511

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    & Yajnik, U

    Yadav, S., Goswami, R., Venkataratnam, K. & Yajnik, U. A. Reheating con- straints on modified quadratic chaotic inflation. The European Physical Journal Plus 139, 185 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-04979-6

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    & Wang, J

    Dai, L., Kamionkowski, M. & Wang, J. Reheating constraints to inflationary models. Physical review letters 113, 041302 (2014). URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.041302. 25 T able 8Numerical values of Mandel’s Q Parameter while n=3, t0 = 1 for various values...

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    & Venkataratnam, K

    Yadav, S., Gangal, D. & Venkataratnam, K. K. Reheating constraints on mutated hilltop inflation. International Journal of Modern Physics D 33, 2450040 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271824500408

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Friedmann, Robertson-Walker (FR W) Models in Cosmology (2013)

    Mohajan, H. Friedmann, Robertson-Walker (FR W) Models in Cosmology (2013). URL https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/52402/

    2013

  7. [15]

    Suresh, P. K. Particle Creation in the Oscillatory Phase of Inflaton. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 425–436 (2004). URL http://link.springer. com/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000028875.07382.4e

    2004

  8. [16]

    & Vennin, V

    Martin, J. & Vennin, V. Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that cmb anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin? Physical Review D 93, 023505 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Kim, J. K. & Kim, S. P. One-parameter squeezed Gaussian states of a time- dependent harmonic oscillator and the selection rule for vacuum states. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32, 2711–2718 (1999). URL https: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/32/14/012

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    & Venturi, G

    Finelli, F., Gruppuso, A. & Venturi, G. Quantum fields in an expanding universe. Classical and Quantum Gravity 16, 3923–3935 (1999). URL https://iopscience. iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/310. 26 T able 9Numerical values of Mandel’s Q Parameter while n=4, t0 = 1 for v...

    1999 doi

  11. [20]

    Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons

    Padmanabhan, T. Gravity and the thermodynamics of horizons. Physics Reports 406, 49–125 (2005). URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0370157304004582

    2005

  12. [21]

    & Venkataratnam, K

    Gangal, D., Yadav, S. & Venkataratnam, K. Density fluctuations for squeezed number state and coherent squeezed number state in flat frw universe. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00432 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Robertson, H. P. Kinematics and world-structure iii. The Astrophysical Journal 83, 257 (1936)

    1936

  14. [24]

    Zel’Dovich, Y. B. & Starobinskij, A. Creation of particles and vacuum polarization in an anisotropic gravitational field. Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 61, 2161–2175 (1971)

    1971

  15. [25]

    & Goobar, A

    Bergstr¨ om, L. & Goobar, A. Cosmology and particle astrophysics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2006). 27 T able 10Numerical values of Mandel’s Q Parameter while n=5, t0 = 1 for various values of ρ and △t ρ △t = 0.1 △t = 0.2 △t = 0.3 △t = 0.4 △t = 0.5 △t = 1 △t = 5 0.002 ...

    2006

  16. [26]

    Ellis, G. F. & Van Elst, H. Cosmological models: Cargese lectures 1998. Theoretical and Observational Cosmology 1–116 (1999)

    1999

  17. [27]

    & Ford, L

    Kuo, C.-I. & Ford, L. H. Semiclassical gravity theory and quantum fluctuations. Physical Review D 47, 4510–4519 (1993). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.47.4510

    1993

  18. [28]

    Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Physical Review D 23, 1693–1708 (1981). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693

    1981 doi

  19. [29]

    Matacz, A. L. Coherent state representation of quantum fluctuations in the early Universe. Physical Review D 49, 788–798 (1994). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.788

    1994 doi

  20. [30]

    Suresh, P. K. Thermal squeezing and density fluctuations in semiclassical theory of gravity. Modern Physics Letters A 16, 707–717 (2001). URL https://www. worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217732301003802

    2001 doi

  21. [31]

    Suresh, P. K. & Kuriakose, V. C. Squeezed state representation of quantum fluc- tuations and semiclassical theory. Modern Physics Letters A 13, 165–172 (1998). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217732398000218

    1998 doi

  22. [32]

    Suresh, P. K. Nonclassical state representation of inflaton and power-law expan- sion in frw universe. Modern Physics Letters A 16, 2431–2438 (2001). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217732301005874. 28 Fig. 8 Dependence of Mandel’s QCSNS Parameter on the ...

    2001 doi

  23. [33]

    Ellis, G. F. R. & Elst, H. in Cosmological Models (ed.Lachi` eze-Rey, M.)The- oretical and Observational Cosmology 1–116 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1999). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-011-4455-1 1

    1999 doi

  24. [34]

    & Umezawa, H

    Takahashi, Y. & Umezawa, H. Thermo field dynamics. International Journal of Modern Physics B 10, 1755–1805 (1996). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/ doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979296000817

    1996 doi

  25. [35]

    & Wang, J.-S

    Xu, X.-L., Li, H.-Q. & Wang, J.-S. Quantum fluctuations of mesoscopic RLC circuit involving complicated coupling in thermal squeezed state. Physica B: Condensed Matter 396, 199–206 (2007). URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ retrieve/pii/S0921452607002256

    2007

  26. [36]

    & Padmanabhan, T

    Mahajan, G. & Padmanabhan, T. Particle creation, classicality and related issues in quantum field theory: I. Formalism and toy models. General Relativ- ity and Gravitation 40, 661–708 (2008). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s10714-007-0526-z. 29 Fig. 9 3D representation ...

    2008

  27. [37]

    & Luminet, J.-P

    Lachi` eze-Rey, M. & Luminet, J.-P. Cosmic topology. Physics Reports 254, 135–214 (1995). URL https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ 037015739400085H

    1995

  28. [38]

    Ellis, G. F. R. & van Elst, H. Cosmological models (Carg` ese lectures 1998) (1998). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9812046

    1998 arXiv

  29. [39]

    Carvalho, A. D. M., Furtado, C. & Pedrosa, I. A. Scalar fields and exact invari- ants in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime. Physical Review D 70, 123523 (2004). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123523

    2004 doi

  30. [40]

    P., Kim, S

    Bak, D., Kim, S. P., Kim, S. K., Soh, K.-S. & Yee, J. H. Quantum inflaton dynamics. Physical Review D 59, 027301 (1998)

    1998

  31. [41]

    & Page, D

    Kim, S. & Page, D. Thermal inflation model in semiclassical quantum gravity. Journal of Korean Physical Society 35, S660–S665 (1999)

    1999

  32. [42]

    Guth, A. H. & Pi, S.-Y. Quantum mechanics of the scalar field in the new inflationary universe. Physical Review D 32, 1899 (1985)

    1985

  33. [43]

    Stochastic inflation: Quantum phase-space approach

    Habib, S. Stochastic inflation: Quantum phase-space approach. Physical Review D 46, 2408 (1992). 30 Fig. 10 3-D representation of the variation in Mandel’s QCSNS as a function of the squeezing parameter ( ρ) and time (t) for the quantum state characterized by n=2. The plot hig...

    1992

  34. [44]

    & Mezhlumian, A

    Linde, A., Linde, D. & Mezhlumian, A. From the big bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe. Physical Review D 49, 1783 (1994)

    1994

  35. [45]

    Kennard, E. H. Zur Quantenmechanik einfacher Bewegungstypen. Zeitschrift for Physik 44, 326–352 (1927). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01391200

    1927 doi

  36. [46]

    Venkataratnam, K. K. & Suresh, P. K. Particle production of coherently oscillat- ing nonclassical inflaton in frw universe. International Journal of Modern Physics D 13, 239–252 (2004). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/ S0218271804004578

    2004

  37. [47]

    Bakke, K., Pedrosa, I. A. & Furtado, C. Geometric phases and squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons. Journal of Mathematical Physics 50, 113521 (2009). URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article/930980

    2009

  38. [48]

    Stoica, O. C. The Friedmann-Lema ˆ ıtre-Robertson-Walker Big Bang Singularities are Well Behaved. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 55, 71–80 (2016). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10773-015-2634-y

    2016 doi

  39. [49]

    Hu, B. L. & Parker, L. Anisotropy damping through quantum effects in the early universe. Physical Review D 17, 933–945 (1978). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.17.933. 31 Fig. 11 3-D representation of the variation in Mandel’s QCSNS as a function of the squeezing...

    1978 doi

  40. [51]

    V., Hartle, J

    Fischetti, M. V., Hartle, J. B. & Hu, B. L. Quantum effects in the early universe. I. Influence of trace anomalies on homogeneous, isotropic, classical geometries. Physical Review D 20, 1757–1771 (1979). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.20.1757

    1979

  41. [52]

    Hartle, J. B. & Hu, B. L. Quantum effects in the early universe. II. Effective action for scalar fields in homogeneous cosmologies with small anisotropy. Phys- ical Review D 20, 1772–1782 (1979). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.20.1772

    1979

  42. [53]

    Hartle, J. B. & Hu, B. L. Quantum effects in the early universe. III. Dissipation of anisotropy by scalar particle production. Physical Review D 21, 2756–2769 (1980). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2756

    1980 doi

  43. [54]

    Hartle, J. B. Quantum effects in the early universe. V. Finite particle production without trace anomalies. Physical Review D 23, 2121–2128 (1981). URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.2121

    1981 doi

  44. [55]

    Effects of quantum fields on singularities and particle horizons in the early universe

    Anderson, P. Effects of quantum fields on singularities and particle horizons in the early universe. Physical Review D 28, 271–285 (1983). URL https://link.aps. 32 Fig. 12 3-D representation of the variation in Mandel’s QCSNS as a function of the squeezing parameter ( ρ) and t...

    1983 doi

  45. [56]

    & Verdaguer, E

    Campos, A. & Verdaguer, E. Semiclassical equations for weakly inhomogeneous cosmologies. Physical Review D 49, 1861–1880 (1994). URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.1861

    1994 doi

  46. [57]

    & Soliani, G

    Geralico, A., Landolfi, G., Ruggeri, G. & Soliani, G. Novel approach to the study of quantum effects in the early Universe. Physical Review D 69, 043504 (2004). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.043504

    2004 doi

  47. [58]

    & Rosas, A

    Pedrosa, I., Furtado, C. & Rosas, A. Exact linear invariants and quantum effects in the early universe. Physics Letters B 651, 384–387 (2007). URL https:// linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0370269307007599

    2007

  48. [60]

    Venkataratnam, K. K. & Suresh, P. K. Nonclassical scalar field in the frw universe. International Journal of Modern Physics D 19, 37–61 (2010). URL https://www. worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021827181001621X

    2010 doi

  49. [61]

    Venkataratnam, K. K. & Suresh, P. K. Density fluctuations in the oscillatory phase of a nonclassical inflaton in the frw universe. International Journal of 33 Fig. 13 3-D representation of the variation in Mandel’s QCSNS as a function of the squeezing parameter ( ρ) and time (...

    2008

  50. [62]

    Venkataratnam, K. K. & Suresh, P. K. Oscillatory phase of nonclassical ther- mal inflaton in frw universe. International Journal of Modern Physics D 19, 1147–1195 (2010). URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/ S0218271810017184

    2010

  51. [63]

    Venkataratnam, K. K. Behavior of non-classical inflaton in the frw universe. Modern Physics Letters A 28, 1350168 (2013). URL https://www.worldscientific. com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021773231350168X

    2013 doi

  52. [64]

    & Venkataratnam, K

    Dhayal, R., Rathore, M. & Venkataratnam, K. K. Quantum fluctuations and par- ticle production in the oscillatory phase of a thermal inflaton in a FR W universe. Modern Physics Letters A 35, 2050022 (2020). URL https://www.worldscientific. com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217732320500224

    2020 doi

  53. [65]

    Koh, S., Kim, S. P. & Song, D. J. Gravitational Wave Spectrum in Infla- tion with Nonclassical States. Journal of High Energy Physics 2004, 060–060 (2004). URL http://stacks.iop.org/1126-6708/2004/i=12/a=060?key=crossref. cd1ab511cad13ad8cdd715eeafc03f08

    2004

  54. [66]

    Lopes, C. E. F., Pedrosa, I. A., Furtado, C. & De M. Carvalho, A. M. Gaussian wave packet states of scalar fields in a universe of de Sitter. Journal of Mathe- matical Physics 50, 083511 (2009). URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article/ 34 Fig. 14 Dependence of Mandel’s QCSNS ...

    2009

  55. [67]

    Lachi` eze-Rey, M. (ed.) Theoretical and observational cosmology: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Theoretical and Observational Cosmology, Carg` ese, France, August 17 - 29, 1998 No. v. 541 in NATO science series Series C, Mathematical and physical sciences...

    1998

  56. [68]

    Lopes, C. E. F., Pedrosa, I. A., Furtado, C. & De M. Carvalho, A. M. Gaussian wave packet states of scalar fields in a universe of de Sitter. Journal of Mathe- matical Physics 50, 083511 (2009). URL https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jmp/article/ 920134

    2009

  57. [69]

    Sinha, S., Raval, A. & Hu, B. Black hole fluctuations and backreaction in stochastic gravity. Foundations of Physics 33, 37–64 (2003)

    2003

  58. [70]

    Did Edwin Hubble plagiarize (2011)

    Shaviv, G. Did Edwin Hubble plagiarize (2011). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1107.0442

    2011 arXiv

  59. [71]

    Berger, B. K. Classical analog of cosmological particle creation. Physical Review D 18, 4367 (1978)

    1978

  60. [72]

    Berger, B. K. Scalar field in the early universe: Coherent-state representation and thermal density matrix. Physical Review D 23, 1250 (1981)

    1981

  61. [73]

    & Sidorov, Y

    Grishchuk, L. & Sidorov, Y. V. Squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons and primordial density fluctuations. Physical Review D 42, 3413 (1990). 35

    1990

  62. [74]

    & Prokopec, T

    Brandenberger, R., Mukhanov, V. & Prokopec, T. Entropy of a classical stochas- tic field and cosmological perturbations. Physical Review Letters 69, 3606 (1992)

    1992

  63. [75]

    & Prokopec, T

    Brandenberger, R., Mukhanov, V. & Prokopec, T. Entropy of the gravitational field. Physical Review D 48, 2443 (1993)

    1993

  64. [76]

    & Ford, L

    Kuo, C.-I. & Ford, L. Semiclassical gravity theory and quantum fluctuations. Physical Review D 47, 4510 (1993)

    1993

  65. [77]

    & Ottewill, A

    Matacz, A., Davies, P. & Ottewill, A. C. Quantum vacuum instability near rotating stars. Physical Review D 47, 1557 (1993)

    1993

  66. [78]

    & Prokopec, T

    Albrecht, A., Ferreira, P., Joyce, M. & Prokopec, T. Inflation and squeezed quantum states. Physical Review D 50, 4807 (1994)

    1994

  67. [79]

    & Giovannini, M

    Gasperini, M. & Giovannini, M. Quantum squeezing and cosmological entropy production. Classical and Quantum Gravity 10, L133 (1993)

    1993

  68. [80]

    L., Kang, G

    Hu, B. L., Kang, G. & Matacz, A. Squeezed vacua and the quantum statistics of cosmological particle creation. International Journal of Modern Physics A 9, 991–1007 (1994)

    1994

  69. [81]

    Nieto, M. M. Displaced and squeezed number states. Physics Letters A 229, 135–143 (1997)

    1997

  70. [82]

    Ellis, G. F. & Van Elst, H. Deviation of geodesics in flrw spacetime geometries. On Einstein ’s Path: Essays in Honor of Engelbert Schucking 203–225 (1999)

    1999

  71. [83]

    Penzias, A. A. & Wilson, R. W. A measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080 mc/s. Astrophysical Journal, vol. 142, p. 419-421 142, 419–421 (1965)

    1965

  72. [84]

    Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe

    Handley, W. Curvature tension: Evidence for a closed universe. Physical Review D 103, L041301 (2021). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.103. L041301

    2021 doi

  73. [85]

    & Walls, D

    Savage, C. & Walls, D. Inhibition of tunneling in optical bistability by a squeezed vacuum. Physical review letters 57, 2164 (1986)

    1986

  74. [86]

    & Steinhardt, P

    Albrecht, A. & Steinhardt, P. J. Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking. Physical Review Letters 48, 1220 (1982)

    1982

  75. [87]

    & Venkataratnam, K

    Gangal, D., Yadav, S. & Venkataratnam, K. Particle production and density fluctuations of non-classical inflaton in coherent squeezed vacuum state of flat frw universe. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13409 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  76. [88]

    Kim, S. P. & Lee, C. H. Nonequilibrium quantum dynamics of second order phase transitions. Physical Review D 62, 125020 (2000). 36

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.