Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 131 references

Editing Implicit and Explicit Representations of Radiance Fields: A Survey

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey claims that the fragmented literature on editing radiance fields can be organized into a unified, methodology-based taxonomy spanning geometry, appearance, and dynamic editing, and it maps NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting…

desk verdict A useful current survey of radiance field editing, but its taxonomy is a set of method families rather than the three editing types promised in the abstract; worth reviewing with revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17628 v1 pith:LKJOYGWN submitted 2024-12-23 cs.CV

Arthur Hubert , Gamal Elghazaly , Raphael Frank This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords SurveyNeuralRadianceFields3DGaussianSplattingFieldEditingLatentSpaceManipulationText-guidedStyletransferScenetaxonomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Radiance fields store a 3D scene in a form that is hard to modify: a neural network's weights in NeRF or a set of Gaussian primitives in 3D Gaussian Splatting. This paper claims that the many scattered strategies for editing such scenes can be organized into a single tree-shaped taxonomy with three top-level editing types (geometry, appearance, and dynamic) and several methodological families, including explicit representation, latent-space manipulation, text-guided editing, compositional editing, hyper-space deformation, surface NeRF, and knowledge distillation. It also reviews pioneering models in each family, compares state-of-the-art methods, and catalogs applications from autonomous-driving simulation to face and body editing. If the taxonomy holds, it gives researchers and practitioners a shared map of what editing operations are possible, how they are achieved, and where the open problems are.

What carries the argument

The main instrument of the survey is its taxonomy: a tree that classifies editing methods by the operation they perform and the mechanism they use, independent of whether the scene is a NeRF or a 3D Gaussian Splatting model. It formalizes editing as replacing an original radiance field $L(r,d)$ by a modified field $L'(r,d)$ over all points and directions, then distinguishes implicit editing, which retrains or modifies the network weights $F_{\theta}$, from explicit editing, which directly manipulates Gaussian parameters $G_i = \langle \mu_i, S_i, R_i, \alpha_i, c_i \rangle$. The taxonomy does the work of turning a large set of individual papers into comparable categories, so that methods as different as bending rays through a mesh proxy and optimizing a CLIP loss can be discussed as sibling strategies.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to assemble a dated list of radiance-field editing papers published before the survey and try to place each into the proposed taxonomy; if a significant number fit no branch, or if two reviewers disagree on placements, the claim that the taxonomy comprehensively covers the literature fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that radiance-field editing, though scattered across NeRF and 3DGS papers, is a coherent research area that can be classified by editing methodology rather than by underlying representation. It proposes a tree taxonomy in which every method falls under geometry, appearance, or dynamic editing, and within those, into families: explicit representations (mesh proxies, editable spatial encodings, and Gaussian primitives), latent-space techniques (conditional generative fields and style transfer), text-guided editing (score distillation, CLIP guidance, and iterative dataset update), compositional scene decomposition, hyper-space deformation, surface-based NeRF editing, and knowledge distillation. The paper also argues that many strategies introduced for implicit NeRF editing carry over to explicit 3DGS editing, and that text-to-image generative models have made editing more accessible. It further claims that the field currently lacks agreed-upon editing-specific benchmarks, with most evaluation relying on rendering metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS plus subjective comparisons.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's claim of being comprehensive rests on the untested premise that the papers it discusses are a complete and representative sample of the editing literature, since it does not state a search strategy or inclusion criteria.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the taxonomy is representation-agnostic, a method validated on NeRF can be assessed for transfer to 3DGS within the same category, and vice versa.
  • The dynamic editing branch links editing to dynamic radiance fields, so object motion and topology changes can share machinery with video editing.
  • Text-guided editing is the most accessible route for non-expert users, with SDS, CLIP, and instruction-based dataset updates as the main levers.
  • The lack of editing-specific metrics means that reported progress mostly rests on rendering quality plus subjective judgment; a shared benchmark would make comparisons sharper.
  • The classified methods directly support applications such as synthetic scenario generation for autonomous driving, human face and body editing, and stylized asset creation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The survey's representation-agnostic framing implies the taxonomy should also accommodate future representations; any new scene encoding that can be edited can likely be slotted into an existing family rather than requiring a new one.
  • An implication the survey leaves implicit is that editing speed, not edit quality, is the current bottleneck: most families rely on lengthy optimization, so the methods that cut optimization time could dominate over time.
  • The iterative-dataset-update family suggests a general recipe -- use a 2D editor to modify rendered views, then retrain -- that could extend beyond radiance fields to any differentiable renderer.
  • A testable extension would be to score each family on edit locality and view consistency, since the survey notes that current metrics do not yet capture those 3D-specific requirements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a survey of radiance-field editing, focused on NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting. It reviews the mathematical background of volumetric rendering and the two base representations, then proposes a taxonomy of editing approaches and surveys representative models, applications, datasets, and metrics. The abstract states that the survey is comprehensive and that the taxonomy is new; the Section 4 text declares geometry, appearance, and dynamic editing as the three editing types. The paper closes with challenges and opportunities.

Significance. The survey addresses a timely and under-covered topic, and it collects a broad set of recent references, including 3DGS-based editing works, which is useful for researchers entering this area. The discussion of missing benchmarks, user interfaces, and editing time in Section 7 is fair and well aimed. If the taxonomy were made internally consistent and the selection of literature transparent, this would be a valuable reference. At present, however, the central claim of a 'new taxonomy' is weakened by the mismatch between the declared editing types and the actual section organization, and the 'comprehensive' claim cannot be verified from the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Table 1] The central claim of a new taxonomy is not currently supported by the manuscript's organization. Section 4 states that the taxonomy distinguishes geometry editing, appearance editing, and dynamic editing, but the subsections 4.1–4.5 are organized by method families (explicit representation, latent space, text-guided, compositional, other), and Table 1's 'Editing Type' column lists the same families (Style transfer, CLIP, Mesh, Text, Hyperspace, Composition). There is no rule stated for mapping a method to a family or to one of the three declared editing types, and dynamic editing only appears as a 'Video Editing' flag in Table 1 rather than as a first-class branch of the taxonomy. Please either reorganize Section 4 around the three declared axes or explicitly redefine the taxonomy as a two-dimensional scheme with method families on one axis and editing types on the other.
  2. [Abstract; Sections 2 and 4] The 'comprehensive survey' claim is not verifiable. The paper gives no search venues, query terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or screening process in Sections 2 and 4, so the reader cannot distinguish a comprehensive collection from a curated selection. This matters because the abstract and Section 2 use 'comprehensive' as a differentiator against prior surveys. Please add a short methodology paragraph describing how the literature was collected and filtered, or replace 'comprehensive' with a more modest claim about representative coverage.
  3. [Section 4.1.3] The subsection on 3D Gaussian Splatting does not actually review 3DGS editing methods: it summarizes the representation's advantages, mentions GaussianEditor and GaussianGrouping in two sentences, and states that many methods 'will be detailed in the corresponding parts of this paper' without a concrete pointer. Since the title promises coverage of explicit radiance-field representations, this subsection should either provide a dedicated review of 3DGS editing methods (including geometry, appearance, and dynamic editing) or explicitly map each 3DGS method to the relevant later subsections.
  4. [Abstract; Section 6] The abstract promises a comparison of approaches 'in terms of editing options and performance,' but no performance comparison is delivered. Table 1 compares editing options and control, while Section 6 only lists evaluation metrics and notes the absence of standard benchmarks. Either add a comparison table with quantitative results (rendering quality, editing time, user-study scores where available) for at least the most popular models, or revise the abstract to say that the comparison covers editing options only.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6.2] 'Peak Signal to Noise Ration' should be 'Peak Signal to Noise Ratio', and 'SSIM))' has an extra closing parenthesis.
  2. [Section 4.2.1] In the sentence 'GIRAFFE [31] directly improves GRAF by two novelties First it adds ...', there is a missing comma or period after 'novelties'; the sentence is run-on.
  3. [Table 2] The Panoptic Dataset row is hard to parse: the camera count '480 VGA camera, 30+ HD camera' and the FPS values '25 30' should be split into explicit columns, and the resolution column should be labeled as VGA/HD.
  4. [References] Several references appear to lack complete bibliographic details, for example [88] 'arXiv e-prints, 2403 (2024)' does not give an article identifier or a complete year; please normalize all arXiv entries.
  5. [Section 6.2, Eq. (10)] The notation ln nf m in Eq. (10) uses subscript and spaces inconsistently; use a single symbol such as L_NNFM.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a descriptive survey with no derived predictions or fitted parameters; the only self-citation is an illustrative example and is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a literature survey rather than a derivation or prediction paper. The central claims, namely delivering a comprehensive survey and proposing a new taxonomy, are organizational claims rather than results derived from assumptions, so the circularity patterns considered here (self-definition, fitted input called prediction, load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness, ansatz smuggled via citation, or renaming a known result) do not apply. The only self-citation is reference [98], the authors' own DENSER paper, used in Section 4.4 as one example among several in a citation cluster for scene graph-based dynamic urban models: the text lists '[94–101]' and then mentions 'scene graph-based models' generally. This citation is illustrative, not evidence for the taxonomy or for any technical claim, and removing it would not change the survey's structure or conclusions. The taxonomy itself is introduced directly in Section 4 from the surveyed methods, with no quantitative or formal result borrowed from prior work. Separately, the manuscript does have methodological limitations that are noted in other review dimensions: no search strategy or inclusion criteria is described, and the declared editing types (geometry, appearance, dynamic) do not cleanly map onto the section headings or Table 1, which weakens the support for 'comprehensive' and 'new taxonomy.' These are completeness and consistency concerns, not circularity, so they do not raise the circularity score. The honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey relies on a conceptual framing of editing as modifying the radiance field and on the unstated choice of which papers to include. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Radiance field editing can be formalized as replacing L(r,d) with L'(r,d)
    Section 3.1 states this without proof; it is a conceptual framing used to organize methods.
  • domain assumption The selected papers are representative of the field
    The survey's comprehensiveness claim depends on this selection, but no systematic search protocol is provided (Sections 2 and 4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Editing Implicit and Explicit Representations of Radiance Fields: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LKJOYGWN

@misc{pith2026241217628,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Editing Implicit and Explicit Representations of Radiance Fields: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LKJOYGWN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17628}
}
read the original abstract

Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) revolutionized novel view synthesis in recent years by offering a new volumetric representation, which is compact and provides high-quality image rendering. However, the methods to edit those radiance fields developed slower than the many improvements to other aspects of NeRF. With the recent development of alternative radiance field-based representations inspired by NeRF as well as the worldwide rise in popularity of text-to-image models, many new opportunities and strategies have emerged to provide radiance field editing. In this paper, we deliver a comprehensive survey of the different editing methods present in the literature for NeRF and other similar radiance field representations. We propose a new taxonomy for classifying existing works based on their editing methodologies, review pioneering models, reflect on current and potential new applications of radiance field editing, and compare state-of-the-art approaches in terms of editing options and performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [98]

    DENSER: 3D Gaussians Splatting for Scene Reconstruction of Dynamic Urban Environments

    Mohamad, M.A., Elghazaly, G., Hubert, A., Frank, R.: Denser: 3d gaus- sians splatting for scene reconstruction of dynamic urban environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10041 (2024)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tancik, M., Casser, V., Yan, X., Pradhan, S., Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Barron, J.T., Kretzschmar, H.: Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view syn- thesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8248–8258 (2022)

    2022

  3. [2]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024)

    Fei, B., Xu, J., Zhang, R., Zhou, Q., Yang, W., He, Y.: 3d gaussian splatting as new era: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    Communications of the ACM 65(1), 99–106 (2021)

    Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM 65(1), 99–106 (2021)

    2021

  5. [4]

    ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 41(4), 1–15 (2022)

    M¨ uller, T., Evans, A., Schied, C., Keller, A.: Instant neural graphics primitives 23 with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG) 41(4), 1–15 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B., Tancik, M., Hedman, P., Martin-Brualla, R., Srinivasan, P.P.: Mip-nerf: A multiscale representation for anti-aliasing neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 5855–5864 (2021)

    2021

  7. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Pumarola, A., Corona, E., Pons-Moll, G., Moreno-Noguer, F.: D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10318–10327 (2021)

    2021

  8. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17797 (2024)

    Wang, X., Hu, S., Fan, H., Zhu, H., Li, X.: Neural radiance fields in medical imaging: Challenges and next steps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17797 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

Show all 131 references
  1. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13816 (2024)

    He, L., Li, L., Sun, W., Han, Z., Liu, Y., Zheng, S., Wang, J., Li, K.: Neural radiance field in autonomous driving: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13816 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, pp

    Laine, S., Karras, T.: Efficient sparse voxel octrees. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, pp. 55– 63 (2010)

    2010

  3. [10]

    ACM Trans

    Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimk¨ uhler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Trans. Graph. 42(4), 139–1 (2023)

    2023

  4. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00379 (2022)

    Gao, K., Gao, Y., He, H., Lu, D., Xu, L., Li, J.: Nerf: Neural radiance field in 3d vision, a comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00379 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  5. [12]

    APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 12(1) (2023)

    Zhu, F., Guo, S., Song, L., Xu, K., Hu, J., et al.: Deep review and analysis of recent nerfs. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 12(1) (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03000 (2023)

    Rabby, A., Zhang, C.: Beyondpixels: A comprehensive review of the evolution of neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03000 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    In: 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pp

    Cai, J., Lu, H.: Nerf-based multi-view synthesis techniques: A survey. In: 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), pp. 208–213 (2024). IEEE

    2024

  8. [15]

    Image and Vision Computing, 105304 (2024)

    Luo, J., Huang, T., Wang, W., Feng, W.: A review of recent advances in 3d gaus- sian splatting for optimization and reconstruction. Image and Vision Computing, 105304 (2024)

    2024

  9. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890 (2024)

    Chen, G., Wang, W.: A survey on 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03890 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Computational Visual Media, 1–30 (2024)

    Wu, T., Yuan, Y.-J., Zhang, L.-X., Yang, J., Cao, Y.-P., Yan, L.-Q., Gao, L.: 24 Recent advances in 3d gaussian splatting. Computational Visual Media, 1–30 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17418 (2024)

    Bao, Y., Ding, T., Huo, J., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Li, W., Gao, Y., Luo, J.: 3d gaussian splatting: Survey, technologies, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17418 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    IEEE Access (2024)

    Dalal, A., Hagen, D., Robbersmyr, K.G., Knausg ˚ ard, K.M.: Gaussian splatting: 3d reconstruction and novel view synthesis, a review. IEEE Access (2024)

    2024

  13. [20]

    zip: A survey on 3d gaussian splatting compression methods

    Bagdasarian, M.T., Knoll, P., Barthel, F., Hilsmann, A., Eisert, P., Morgenstern, W.: 3dgs. zip: A survey on 3d gaussian splatting compression methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09510 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  14. [21]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13255 4 (2024)

    Tosi, F., Zhang, Y., Gong, Z., Sandstr¨ om, E., Mattoccia, S., Oswald, M.R., Poggi, M.: How nerfs and 3d gaussian splatting are reshaping slam: a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13255 4 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [22]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01333 (2024)

    Wang, G., Pan, L., Peng, S., Liu, S., Xu, C., Miao, Y., Zhan, W., Tomizuka, M., Pollefeys, M., Wang, H.: Nerf in robotics: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.01333 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  16. [23]

    World Electric Vehicle Journal 15(3), 85 (2024)

    Yang, K., Cheng, Y., Chen, Z., Wang, J.: Slam meets nerf: A survey of implicit slam methods. World Electric Vehicle Journal 15(3), 85 (2024)

    2024

  17. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05526 (2024)

    Ming, Y., Yang, X., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Feng, J., Xing, Y., Zhang, G.: Bench- marking neural radiance fields for autonomous robots: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05526 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  18. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00028 (2024)

    Yan, X., Xu, J., Huo, Y., Bao, H.: Neural rendering and its hardware accelera- tion: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00028 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  19. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Srinivasan, P.P., Deng, B., Zhang, X., Tancik, M., Mildenhall, B., Barron, J.T.: Nerv: Neural reflectance and visibility fields for relighting and view synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7495–7504 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Boss, M., Braun, R., Jampani, V., Barron, J.T., Liu, C., Lensch, H.: Nerd: Neural reflectance decomposition from image collections. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 12684–12694 (2021)

    2021

  21. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13228 (2021) 25

    Park, K., Sinha, U., Hedman, P., Barron, J.T., Bouaziz, S., Goldman, D.B., Martin-Brualla, R., Seitz, S.M.: Hypernerf: A higher-dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13228 (2021) 25

    2021 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 20154–20166 (2020)

    Schwarz, K., Liao, Y., Niemeyer, M., Geiger, A.: Graf: Generative radiance fields for 3d-aware image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 20154–20166 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Liu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., Zhu, J.-Y., Russell, B.: Editing conditional radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 5773–5783 (2021)

    2021

  24. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Niemeyer, M., Geiger, A.: Giraffe: Representing scenes as compositional gen- erative neural feature fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11453–11464 (2021)

    2021

  25. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08609 (2024)

    Lin, J.: Dynamic nerf: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08609 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  26. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Wang, C., Chai, M., He, M., Chen, D., Liao, J.: Clip-nerf: Text-and-image driven manipulation of neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3835–3844 (2022)

    2022

  27. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Jang, W., Agapito, L.: Codenerf: Disentangled neural radiance fields for object categories. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 12949–12958 (2021)

    2021

  28. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Kania, K., Yi, K.M., Kowalski, M., Trzci´ nski, T., Tagliasacchi, A.: Conerf: Con- trollable neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 18623–18632 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 57(12), 1–61 (2024)

    Lu, L., Li, R., Zhang, X., Wei, H., Du, G., Wang, B.: Advances in text-guided 3d editing: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 57(12), 1–61 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)

    Zhan, F., Yu, Y., Wu, R., Zhang, J., Lu, S., Liu, L., Kortylewski, A., Theobalt, C., Xing, E.: Multimodal image synthesis and editing: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2023)

    2023

  31. [38]

    In: Proceedings Visualization, 2001

    Ewa volume splatting. In: Proceedings Visualization, 2001. VIS’01., pp. 29–538 (2001). IEEE

    2001

  32. [39]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Tang, Z., Ren, Z., Zhao, X., Wen, B., Tremblay, J., Birchfield, S., Schwing, A.: Nerfdeformer: Nerf transformation from a single view via 3d scene flows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10293–10303 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    https://www.blender.org/

    Roosendaal, T.: blender.org. https://www.blender.org/

  34. [41]

    In: Symposium on Geometry Processing, vol

    Sorkine, O., Alexa, M.: As-rigid-as-possible surface modeling. In: Symposium on Geometry Processing, vol. 4, pp. 109–116 (2007). Citeseer 26

    2007

  35. [42]

    In: Seminal Graphics: Pioneering Efforts that Shaped the Field, pp

    Lorensen, W.E., Cline, H.E.: Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface con- struction algorithm. In: Seminal Graphics: Pioneering Efforts that Shaped the Field, pp. 347–353 (1998)

    1998

  36. [43]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(12), 14821–14837 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3315068

    Yuan, Y.-J., Sun, Y.-T., Lai, Y.-K., Ma, Y., Jia, R., Kobbelt, L., Gao, L.: Interactive nerf geometry editing with shape priors. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(12), 14821–14837 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2023.3315068

    2023

  37. [44]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Yang, B., Bao, C., Zeng, J., Bao, H., Zhang, Y., Cui, Z., Zhang, G.: Neumesh: Learning disentangled neural mesh-based implicit field for geometry and tex- ture editing. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 597–614 (2022). Springer

    2022

  38. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Yuan, Y.-J., Sun, Y.-T., Lai, Y.-K., Ma, Y., Jia, R., Gao, L.: Nerf-editing: Geom- etry editing of neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 18353–18364 (2022)

    2022

  39. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10689 (2021)

    Wang, P., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Theobalt, C., Komura, T., Wang, W.: Neus: Learning neural implicit surfaces by volume rendering for multi-view reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10689 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  40. [47]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Xu, T., Harada, T.: Deforming radiance fields with cages. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 159–175 (2022). Springer

    2022

  41. [48]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 6(1) (2023)

    Jambon, C., Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Diolatzis, S., Leimk¨ uhler, T., Drettakis, G.: Nerfshop: Interactive editing of neural radiance fields. Proceedings of the ACM on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 6(1) (2023)

    2023

  42. [49]

    In: Deformation Models: Tracking, Animation and Applications, pp

    Nieto, J.R., Sus ´ ın, A.: Cage based deformations: a survey. In: Deformation Models: Tracking, Animation and Applications, pp. 75–99. Springer, ??? (2012)

    2012

  43. [50]

    In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp

    Ju, T., Schaefer, S., Warren, J.: Mean value coordinates for closed triangular meshes. In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp. 223–228 (2023)

    2023

  44. [51]

    In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp

    Lazova, V., Guzov, V., Olszewski, K., Tulyakov, S., Pons-Moll, G.: Control-nerf: Editable feature volumes for scene rendering and manipulation. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (W ACV), pp. 4340–4350 (2023)

    2023

  45. [52]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 15651–15663 (2020)

    Liu, L., Gu, J., Zaw Lin, K., Chua, T.-S., Theobalt, C.: Neural sparse voxel fields. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, 15651–15663 (2020)

    2020

  46. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14521 (2023)

    Chen, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, C., Wang, F., Yang, X., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Yang, L., Liu, H., Lin, G.: Gaussianeditor: Swift and controllable 3d editing with gaussian 27 splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14521 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Ye, M., Danelljan, M., Yu, F., Ke, L.: Gaussian Grouping: Segment and Edit Anything in 3D Scenes (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    Zhang, H., Tai, Y.-W., Tang, C.-K.: FED-NeRF: Achieve High 3D Consistency and Temporal Coherence for Face Video Editing on Dynamic NeRF (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Bao, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, B., Fan, T., Yang, Z., Bao, H., Zhang, G., Cui, Z.: Sine: Semantic-driven image-based nerf editing with prior-guided editing field. In: 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 20919–20929 (2023). https://doi.org...

    2023

  50. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Sun, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., Wang, J.: Fenerf: Face editing in neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7672–7682 (2022)

    2022

  51. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08985 (2021)

    Gu, J., Liu, L., Wang, P., Theobalt, C.: Stylenerf: A style-based 3d-aware generator for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.08985 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  52. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Song, H., Choi, S., Do, H., Lee, C., Kim, T.: Blending-nerf: Text-driven localized editing in neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 14383–14393 (2023)

    2023

  53. [60]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

    Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  54. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Gatys, L.A., Ecker, A.S., Bethge, M.: Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2414–2423 (2016)

    2016

  55. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Huang, H.-P., Tseng, H.-Y., Saini, S., Singh, M., Yang, M.-H.: Learning to styl- ize novel views. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 13869–13878 (2021)

    2021

  56. [63]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Wang, W., Xu, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Liu, J.: Consistent video style trans- fer via compound regularization. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 12233–12240 (2020)

    2020

  57. [64]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zhang, K., Kolkin, N., Bi, S., Luan, F., Xu, Z., Shechtman, E., Snavely, N.: Arf: Artistic radiance fields. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 717–733 (2022). Springer

    2022

  58. [65]

    Zhang, D., Fernandez-Labrador, C., Schroers, C.: CoARF: Controllable 3D Artistic Style Transfer for Radiance Fields (2024) 28

    2024

  59. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03546 (2022)

    Li, B., Weinberger, K.Q., Belongie, S., Koltun, V., Ranftl, R.: Language-driven semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03546 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  60. [67]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Liu, K., Zhan, F., Chen, Y., Zhang, J., Yu, Y., El Saddik, A., Lu, S., Xing, E.P.: Stylerf: Zero-shot 3d style transfer of neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8338–8348 (2023)

    2023

  61. [68]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023)

    Wang, C., Jiang, R., Chai, M., He, M., Chen, D., Liao, J.: Nerf-art: Text- driven neural radiance fields stylization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023)

    2023

  62. [69]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

    Chiang, P.-Z., Tsai, M.-S., Tseng, H.-Y., Lai, W.-S., Chiu, W.-C.: Stylizing 3d scene via implicit representation and hypernetwork. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1475– 1484 (2022)

    2022

  63. [70]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Huang, Y.-H., He, Y., Yuan, Y.-J., Lai, Y.-K., Gao, L.: Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as stylized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18342–18352 (2022)

    2022

  64. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09473 (2024)

    Jain, S., Kuthiala, A., Sethi, P.S., Saxena, P.: Stylesplat: 3d object style transfer with gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09473 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  65. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07807 (2024)

    Liu, K., Zhan, F., Xu, M., Theobalt, C., Shao, L., Lu, S.: Stylegaussian: Instant 3d style transfer with gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07807 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  66. [73]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08498 (2024)

    Saroha, A., Gladkova, M., Curreli, C., Yenamandra, T., Cremers, D.: Gaussian splatting in style. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08498 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  67. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05220 (2024)

    Zhang, D., Chen, Z., Yuan, Y.-J., Zhang, F.-L., He, Z., Shan, S., Gao, L.: Stylizedgs: Controllable stylization for 3d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05220 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12452 (2023)

    Li, W., Wu, T., Zhong, F., Oztireli, C.: Arf-plus: Controlling perceptual factors in artistic radiance fields for 3d scene stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12452 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  69. [76]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

    Poole, B., Jain, A., Barron, J.T., Mildenhall, B.: Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  70. [77]

    : Learning transferable visual mod- els from natural language supervision

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. : Learning transferable visual mod- els from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8748–8763 (2021). PMLR 29

    2021

  71. [78]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Haque, A., Tancik, M., Efros, A.A., Holynski, A., Kanazawa, A.: Instruct- nerf2nerf: Editing 3d scenes with instructions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 19740–19750 (2023)

    2023

  72. [79]

    In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pp

    Zhuang, J., Wang, C., Lin, L., Liu, L., Li, G.: Dreameditor: Text-driven 3d scene editing with neural fields. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Conference Papers, pp. 1–10 (2023)

    2023

  73. [80]

    Liu, J.-W., Cao, Y.-P., Wu, J.Z., Mao, W., Gu, Y., Zhao, R., Keppo, J., Shan, Y., Shou, M.Z.: DynVideo-E: Harnessing Dynamic NeRF for Large-Scale Motion- and View-Change Human-Centric Video Editing (2023)

    2023

  74. [81]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    Huang, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, A., Cao, H., Qi, X., Shi, Y., Zha, Z.-J., Zhang, L.: Dreamwaltz: Make a scene with complex 3d animatable avatars. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    2024

  75. [82]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    Kolotouros, N., Alldieck, T., Zanfir, A., Bazavan, E., Fieraru, M., Sminchis- escu, C.: Dreamhuman: Animatable 3d avatars from text. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    2024

  76. [83]

    Dong, J., Fang, Q., Huang, Z., Xu, X., Wang, J., Peng, S., Dai, B.: TELA: Text to Layer-wise 3D Clothed Human Generation (2024)

    2024

  77. [84]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    Dong, J., Wang, Y.-X.: Vica-nerf: View-consistency-aware 3d editing of neural radiance fields. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (2024)

    2024

  78. [85]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Brooks, T., Holynski, A., Efros, A.A.: Instructpix2pix: Learning to follow image editing instructions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18392–18402 (2023)

    2023

  79. [86]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02363 (2022)

    Nguyen-Phuoc, T., Liu, F., Xiao, L.: Snerf: stylized neural implicit representa- tions for 3d scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02363 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  80. [87]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Wang, Y., Wu, W., Xu, D.: Learning unified decompositional and composi- tional nerf for editable novel view synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 18247–18256 (2023)

    2023

  81. [88]

    arXiv e-prints, 2403 (2024)

    Dahmani, H., Bennehar, M., Piasco, N., Roldao, L., Tsishkou, D.: Swag: Splat- ting in the wild images with appearance-conditioned gaussians. arXiv e-prints, 2403 (2024)

    2024

  82. [89]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Martin-Brualla, R., Radwan, N., Sajjadi, M.S., Barron, J.T., Dosovitskiy, A., Duckworth, D.: Nerf in the wild: Neural radiance fields for unconstrained photo collections. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7210–7219 (2021)

    2021

  83. [90]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04988 (2023)

    Guo, J., Deng, N., Li, X., Bai, Y., Shi, B., Wang, C., Ding, C., Wang, D., Li, Y.: 30 Streetsurf: Extending multi-view implicit surface reconstruction to street views. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04988 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  84. [91]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Turki, H., Zhang, J.Y., Ferroni, F., Ramanan, D.: Suds: Scalable urban dynamic scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12375–12385 (2023)

    2023

  85. [92]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02077 (2023)

    Yang, J., Ivanovic, B., Litany, O., Weng, X., Kim, S.W., Li, B., Che, T., Xu, D., Fidler, S., Pavone, M., et al.: Emernerf: Emergent spatial-temporal scene decomposition via self-supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02077 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  86. [93]

    arXiv e-prints, 2403 (2024)

    Nguyen, T.-A.-Q., Rold˜ ao, L., Piasco, N., Bennehar, M., Tsishkou, D.: Rodus: Robust decomposition of static and dynamic elements in urban scenes. arXiv e-prints, 2403 (2024)

    2024

  87. [94]

    In: CAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp

    Wu, Z., Liu, T., Luo, L., Zhong, Z., Chen, J., Xiao, H., Hou, C., Lou, H., Chen, Y., Yang, R., et al.: Mars: An instance-aware, modular and realistic sim- ulator for autonomous driving. In: CAAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3–15 (2023). Springer

    2023

  88. [95]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01339 (2024)

    Yan, Y., Lin, H., Zhou, C., Wang, W., Sun, H., Zhan, K., Lang, X., Zhou, X., Peng, S.: Street gaussians for modeling dynamic urban scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01339 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Zhou, X., Lin, Z., Shan, X., Wang, Y., Sun, D., Yang, M.-H.: DrivingGaussian: Composite Gaussian Splatting for Surrounding Dynamic Autonomous Driving Scenes (2024)

    2024

  90. [97]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ost, J., Mannan, F., Thuerey, N., Knodt, J., Heide, F.: Neural scene graphs for dynamic scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2856–2865 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16760 (2024)

    Chen, Z., Yang, J., Huang, J., Lutio, R., Esturo, J.M., Ivanovic, B., Litany, O., Gojcic, Z., Fidler, S., Pavone, M., et al.: Omnire: Omni urban scene reconstruction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16760 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11921 (2024)

    Peng, C., Zhang, C., Wang, Y., Xu, C., Xie, Y., Zheng, W., Keutzer, K., Tomizuka, M., Zhan, W.: Desire-gs: 4d street gaussians for static-dynamic decomposition and surface reconstruction for urban driving scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11921 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  93. [101]

    31 In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhou, H., Shao, J., Xu, L., Bai, D., Qiu, W., Liu, B., Wang, Y., Geiger, A., Liao, Y.: Hugs: Holistic urban 3d scene understanding via gaussian splatting. 31 In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21336–21345 (2024)

    2024

  94. [102]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Attal, B., Huang, J.-B., Richardt, C., Zollhoefer, M., Kopf, J., O’Toole, M., Kim, C.: Hyperreel: High-fidelity 6-dof video with ray-conditioned sampling. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16610–16620 (2023)

    2023

  95. [103]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Fridovich-Keil, S., Meanti, G., Warburg, F.R., Recht, B., Kanazawa, A.: K- planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12479–12488 (2023)

    2023

  96. [104]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zheng, C., Lin, W., Xu, F.: Editablenerf: Editing topologically varying neural radiance fields by key points. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8317–8327 (2023)

    2023

  97. [105]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp

    Teed, Z., Deng, J.: Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp. 402–419 (2020). Springer

    2020

  98. [106]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 40(6), 1–18 (2021)

    Zhang, X., Srinivasan, P.P., Deng, B., Debevec, P., Freeman, W.T., Barron, J.T.: Nerfactor: Neural factorization of shape and reflectance under an unknown illumination. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG) 40(6), 1–18 (2021)

    2021

  99. [107]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Wang, X., Zhu, J., Ye, Q., Huo, Y., Ran, Y., Zhong, Z., Chen, J.: Seal-3d: Interactive pixel-level editing for neural radiance fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 17683–17693 (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    Huang, Z., Shi, Y., Bruce, N., Gong, M.: SealD-NeRF: Interactive Pixel-Level Editing for Dynamic Scenes by Neural Radiance Fields (2024)

    2024

  101. [109]

    https://scaniverse.com/

    AI, T.: The Scaniverse app. https://scaniverse.com/

  102. [110]

    Fang, J., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Xie, L., Tian, Q.: GaussianEditor: Editing 3D Gaussians Delicately with Text Instructions (2023)

    2023

  103. [111]

    Dong, S., Ding, L., Huang, Z., Wang, Z., Xue, T., Xu, D.: Interactive3D: Create What You Want by Interactive 3D Generation (2024)

    2024

  104. [112]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02463 (2023)

    Jun, H., Nichol, A.: Shap-e: Generating conditional 3d implicit functions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02463 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  105. [113]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Athar, S., Xu, Z., Sunkavalli, K., Shechtman, E., Shu, Z.: Rignerf: Fully con- trollable neural 3d portraits. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 20364–20373 (2022) 32

    2022

  106. [114]

    Liu, Y., Guan, H., Luo, C., Fan, L., Peng, J., Zhang, Z.: CityGaussian: Real-time High-quality Large-Scale Scene Rendering with Gaussians (2024)

    2024

  107. [115]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Li, Y., Lin, Z.-H., Forsyth, D., Huang, J.-B., Wang, S.: Climatenerf: Extreme weather synthesis in neural radiance field. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3227–3238 (2023)

    2023

  108. [116]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp

    Lu, F., Xu, Y., Chen, G., Li, H., Lin, K.-Y., Jiang, C.: Urban radiance field representation with deformable neural mesh primitives. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 465–476 (2023)

    2023

  109. [117]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Peng, S., Dong, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, S., Shuai, Q., Zhou, X., Bao, H.: Animatable neural radiance fields for modeling dynamic human bodies. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 14314–14323 (2021)

    2021

  110. [118]

    In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp

    Loper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G., Black, M.J.: Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear model. In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp. 851–866 (2023)

    2023

  111. [119]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., Aila, T.: Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8110–8119 (2020)

    2020

  112. [120]

    In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp

    Blanz, V., Vetter, T.: A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In: Seminal Graphics Papers: Pushing the Boundaries, Volume 2, pp. 157–164 (2023)

    2023

  113. [121]

    https://www.cvlibs.net/ datasets/kitti/

    Technology, K.I., Institute, T.T.: KITTI dataset. https://www.cvlibs.net/ datasets/kitti/

  114. [122]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp

    Li, T., Slavcheva, M., Zollh¨ ofer, M., Green, S., Lassner, C., Kim, C., Schmidt, T., Lovegrove, S., Goesele, M., Newcombe, R., Lv, Z.: Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)...

    2022

  115. [123]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Joo, H., Liu, H., Tan, L., Gui, L., Nabbe, B., Matthews, I., Kanade, T., Nobuhara, S., Sheikh, Y.: Panoptic studio: A massively multiview system for social motion capture. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3334–3342 (2015)

    2015

  116. [124]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics 36(4) (2017)

    Knapitsch, A., Park, J., Zhou, Q.-Y., Koltun, V.: Tanks and temples: Bench- marking large-scale scene reconstruction. ACM Transactions on Graphics 36(4) (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2020)

    Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., 33 Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., Caine, B., Vasudevan, V., Han, W., Ngiam, J., Zhao, H., Timofeev, A., Ettinger, S., Krivokon, M., Gao, A., Joshi, A., Zhang, Y., Shlens, J., Chen, Z., Anguelov, D.: Sca...

    2020

  118. [126]

    IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assess- ment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    2004

  119. [127]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A.A., Shechtman, E., Wang, O.: The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 586–595 (2018)

    2018

  120. [128]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., Hochreiter, S.: Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  121. [129]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Li, B., Qi, X., Lukasiewicz, T., Torr, P.H.: Manigan: Text-guided image manip- ulation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7880–7889 (2020)

    2020

  122. [130]

    In: 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pp

    Luiten, J., Kopanas, G., Leibe, B., Ramanan, D.: Dynamic 3d gaussians: Track- ing by persistent dynamic view synthesis. In: 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pp. 800–809 (2024). IEEE

    2024

  123. [131]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Zheng, Y., Harley, A.W., Shen, B., Wetzstein, G., Guibas, L.J.: Pointodyssey: A large-scale synthetic dataset for long-term point tracking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 19855–19865 (2023) 34

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.