Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

KRAIL: A Knowledge-Driven Framework for Base Human Reliability Analysis Integrating IDHEAS and Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.18627 v1 pith:HJKJCLMS submitted 2024-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reliabilityframeworkhumananalysisbaselanguageidheasintegrating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Human reliability analysis (HRA) is crucial for evaluating and improving the safety of complex systems. Recent efforts have focused on estimating human error probability (HEP), but existing methods often rely heavily on expert knowledge,which can be subjective and time-consuming. Inspired by the success of large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing, this paper introduces a novel two-stage framework for knowledge-driven reliability analysis, integrating IDHEAS and LLMs (KRAIL). This innovative framework enables the semi-automated computation of base HEP values. Additionally, knowledge graphs are utilized as a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for enhancing the framework' s capability to retrieve and process relevant data efficiently. Experiments are systematically conducted and evaluated on authoritative datasets of human reliability. The experimental results of the proposed methodology demonstrate its superior performance on base HEP estimation under partial information for reliability assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. InSight-R: A Framework for Risk-informed Human Failure Event Identification and Interface-Induced Risk Assessment Driven by AutoGraph

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An interface knowledge graph combined with logged operator behavior can identify human failure events from error-prone and time-deviated paths, and simple layout metrics can be mapped to interface risk levels, but val...

  2. A Dynamic and High-Precision Method for Scenario-Based HRA Synthetic Data Collection in Multi-Agent Collaborative Environments Driven by LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-7B on reactor-operator simulator data yields workload estimates that the authors report as more accurate than zero-shot commercial LLMs, but the evaluation lacks a demonstrated train/test split.

Pith tools