Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Transferring vibrational states of trapped atoms via a Rydberg electron

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A single vibrational quantum can be coherently transferred between two trapped atoms about a micrometer apart, mediated by a Rydberg electron, with near-perfect transfer at a specific choice of distance and trap frequency.

desk verdict New mechanism for vibrational transfer via Rydberg-electron scattering, with a plausible but unbenchmarked quantitative core. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19016 v1 pith:LZOMHHOX submitted 2024-12-26 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Abhijit Pendse , Sebastian Wüster , Matthew T. Eiles , Alexander Eisfeld This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph
keywords RydbergatomsvibrationalstatetransferFermipseudopotentialopticaltweezersultracoldstrontiumeffectiveHamiltoniancoherentmicrometer-scaleinteractions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a single quantum of vibrational motion can be coherently moved from one trapped neutral atom to another atom roughly a micrometer away, using a third atom excited to a Rydberg state as the mediator. The Rydberg electron's orbital overlaps both neighboring atoms, and its scattering off them creates an effective coupling that exchanges their vibrational states. Numerically solving the three-atom dynamics, the authors find a 'sweet spot'—trap separation near 1.02 micrometers and a central-trap frequency near 0.88 times the outer-trap frequency—where the transfer is nearly complete and occurs in about 0.1 milliseconds, faster than the Rydberg lifetime. This matters because it offers a mechanism for long-range, coherent coupling between neutral atoms without relying on the usual dipole-dipole Rydberg-Rydberg interactions.

What carries the argument

The key object is the Fermi pseudopotential interaction, which gives an atom-atom coupling proportional to the Rydberg electron density at the ground-state atom's position: $H_i^{(\mathrm{int})} = U_e |\phi_\nu^{(s)}(\vec{D}_i+\vec{R}_i-\vec{R}_0)|^2$, with $U_e = 2\pi\hbar^2 a_e/m_e$. The coupling matrix elements $T^{n_0,n_i}_{n'_0,n'_i}$ are overlaps of the oscillator states with this density. A second-order effective Hamiltonian in the subspace of one-excitation states yields two-state and three-state models; the three-state model with detuning $\Delta = \hbar(\omega_0-\omega)-T^{0,0}_{1,1}$ and nearest-neighbor coupling $\alpha = T^{0,0}_{1,1}$ explains the sweet spot, where $\Delta = 0$ gives complete transfer at time $t_0 = \pi\hbar/(\sqrt{2}\alpha)$.

What would settle it

Measure the transfer efficiency and first-peak time for three trapped strontium atoms with a $\nu = 100$ s Rydberg state at $D \approx 1.02\ \mu$m and $\omega_0 \approx 0.88\omega$; if the population in |0,0,1> fails to reach near unity at about 0.1 ms, the first-order additive Fermi-pseudopotential model is incorrect. A cheaper calculation would compare the matrix elements $T$ with a full multi-center electronic structure treatment of the electron scattering at $D \approx 1\ \mu$m.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the short-range electron-atom scattering interaction, which is ordinarily used to form ultralong-range Rydberg molecules, can act as a coherent coupler between the motional states of two trapped ground-state atoms separated by about a micrometer. In the proposed linear three-trap setup, the interaction matrix elements couple the states |1,0,0> and |0,0,1>, producing Rabi-like oscillations of a single vibrational excitation between the outer traps. Near the sweet spot the transfer reaches nearly unit population in about 0.1 ms, and the same dynamics is captured by a three-state effective Hamiltonian whose detuning vanishes at the optimal parameters. The paper argues these features are generic to species with a negative electron-atom scattering length and will appear in other atomic species.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's quantitative predictions rest on treating the Rydberg electron wavefunction as unperturbed by the two ground-state atoms and summing their scattering effects independently, so the computed coupling strengths and the sweet spot would shift if multi-center or higher-order scattering effects are significant at micrometer separations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A vibrational qubit stored in one trap can be coherently delivered to another trap at micrometer separation, without physically moving the atoms.
  • The transfer time of about 0.1 ms is short compared with the Rydberg lifetime of a few hundred microseconds, so decay of the Rydberg state does not spoil the transfer at the sweet spot.
  • Switching to an atom species with a more negative scattering length, such as caesium with $a_e \approx -20a_0$, would speed up the transfer by roughly a factor of two for the same geometry.
  • Because the interaction depends only on distances for an s-state Rydberg atom, the collinear arrangement is a convenience; non-collinear trap geometries should also support the transfer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism could generate Bell states between motional qubits in separate traps, since intermediate times correspond to superpositions of |1,0,0> and |0,0,1>; the paper notes this possibility but does not analyze fidelity under decoherence.
  • The oscillation frequency as a function of trap distance D maps out the outer lobe of the Rydberg electron density, so this setup could serve as a high-resolution probe of the Rydberg wavefunction.
  • A natural extension is to use the coupling as a switchable long-range interaction, since the strength can be tuned dynamically by adjusting the Rydberg principal quantum number or the trap positions.
  • For higher vibrational excitations or coherent oscillator states, the simple effective-Hamiltonian picture may break down; the paper leaves this regime open for future work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism for coherent transfer of a single vibrational excitation between two ground-state atoms separated by about one micrometer, mediated by the scattering of the Rydberg electron of a centrally located Rydberg atom. The authors model three atoms in harmonic traps, with the central atom in a high-n s-state (n=100, strontium parameters), and compute the resulting coupling from the Fermi pseudopotential in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Solving the full many-level dynamics, they find near-perfect population transfer between |1,0,0> and |0,0,1> at a 'sweet spot' around D≈1.02 μm and ω0≈0.88ω, with a transfer time near 0.1 ms. They also derive effective two- and three-state models that reproduce much of the dynamics and use them to explain the resonance condition. The paper concludes with a discussion of robustness, parameter scalings, and experimental constraints.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, this is a genuinely new way to couple motional (vibrational) states of trapped atoms over micrometer distances, with potential applications in quantum information processing and quantum simulation with neutral-atom arrays. The paper is particularly strong in its internal consistency: the full numerical dynamics, the reduced effective models, and the parameter scans all cohere, and the sweet spot is found by scanning physical parameters rather than by fitting. It also makes concrete, falsifiable predictions (specific D, ω0/ω, and transfer time) that could be tested in existing strontium-tweezer setups. The main weakness is that all quantitative outputs rest on the first-order Fermi-pseudopotential coupling in Eq. (3), which is standard but not benchmarked in the relevant regime.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (3)] Every quantitative result in the paper—the coupling matrix elements T, the 0.1 ms transfer time, and the sweet spot D≈1.02 μm, ω0≈0.88ω—is computed from the first-order Fermi-pseudopotential expectation value in the unperturbed Rydberg orbital, with the two ground-state atoms treated as independent scatterers. This is a standard approximation in ultralong-range Rydberg molecule theory, so the concern is not that it is outside consensus; it is that it is unvalidated in precisely the regime used here (n=100, D≈1 μm, near the outer lobe), and the transverse-constant reduction leading to Eq. (6) is similarly uncontrolled. Since the resonance condition Δ=ℏ(ω0−ω)−α and the Rabi rate both depend directly on T, a 10–20% systematic error in T would shift the sweet spot and the transfer time beyond the quoted 30-nm/5% robustness window. I therefore request either (i) a benchmark of Eq. (3) against a multi-center electron-scattering calculation (e.g., a frame-transformation or quantum-defect treatment including both scatterers), or (ii) an explicit sensitivity analysis in which T is scaled by a constant factor and the figures of merit in Fig. 3(b) are recomputed. Without one of these, the quantitative central claim remains conditional on an unverified input.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (4)-(7)] The notation for the interaction matrix elements is hard to follow: Eq. (7) writes 'n_i' in the subscript although the index should be n1 or n2, and the roles of superscripts and subscripts are not stated explicitly. Please define the ordering of the four indices once and use it consistently.
  2. [Section 3.3, text near Fig. 3(a)] The sentence 'for the cases with 0.1 µs' appears to be a typo; the relevant timescale in the figure is 0.1 ms, not 0.1 µs.
  3. [Supplemental Material, Eq. (S3)] The coordinate transformation line contains a duplicated assignment 'yc = zi + z0'; this typo should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3, numerical methods] The full numerical simulations do not state the number of oscillator basis states retained per trap. For reproducibility, please specify the basis sizes used in Figs. 1–3 and provide a short convergence statement.
  5. [Throughout] The Rydberg state is written as 'νs' in places; please use 'ns' or 'nS' consistently with the definition of the principal quantum number to avoid confusion.
  6. [References] Reference [43] appears corrupted in the text ('B/suppress lasiak'); the full author list should be restored.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transfer dynamics and sweet spot are computed from first-principles matrix elements and numerical scans, not fitted to the target outcome.

full rationale

The central claim is derived rather than assumed. The interaction Hamiltonian (Eq. 3) is the standard first-order Fermi pseudopotential expectation value, and the matrix elements (Eqs. 5-6) are evaluated from the Rydberg s-state wavefunction with fixed atomic parameters (Sr, nu=100, ae=-13a0). No parameter is fitted to the transfer dynamics. The 'sweet spot' (D approx 1.02 um, omega0 approx 0.88 omega) is found by direct numerical solution of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation over a grid of distances and frequencies (Fig. 3), and the resonance condition Delta=0 follows from the computed matrix element T^{0,0}_{1,1} in Eq. (9), not imposed as input. The effective two- and three-state Hamiltonians in Sec. 3.2 are derived from the same matrix elements by standard second-order perturbation theory and are explicitly benchmarked against the full numerics in the Supplemental Material (Figs. S1-S4), so they are reduced models, not self-fulfilling predictions. Author-inclusive citations (e.g., refs. 55-57, 63) provide background on Rydberg composites and the frame-transformation scattering theory; none is used to forbid alternative mechanisms or to import the transfer result. The honest caveat is accuracy of the first-order Fermi pseudopotential and two-atom additivity at D approx 1 um, which the paper itself flags via the reduced accuracy of the effective model at D=1.06 um and the narrow robustness window (about 30 nm, about 5%); this is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to experimental data; the trap frequencies, distances, and principal quantum number are experimental design inputs rather than free parameters. The central claim rests on standard Fermi-pseudopotential and Born-Oppenheimer approximations that are stated in the paper but not benchmarked against full 3D or experimental results. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Fermi pseudopotential with a single Sr scattering length ae = -13 a0 describes the Rydberg electron-ground-state-atom interaction (Eq. 3).
    Used to build H_int; standard in ultracold Rydberg molecule theory but ignores energy dependence, higher partial waves, and possible spin channels.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation: the Rydberg electron adiabatically follows the atomic motion, so the interaction is the first-order expectation value of the electron density at each atom (Eq. 3).
    Valid for slow heavy atoms versus fast electron, but electron wavefunction distortion by the atoms is neglected.
  • domain assumption Tight transverse confinement with omega_y = omega_z = 5 omega_x reduces the 3D problem to a 1D oscillator chain (Eq. 6 and Supplement S I).
    The reduction assumes the Rydberg wavefunction is constant over the transverse oscillator length; this is an approximation, not a proven limit.
  • domain assumption The vibrational basis can be truncated: states with energies approximately 5 omega_i or higher are negligible.
    Used to keep the numerical basis small; no explicit convergence study is reported.
  • domain assumption The three atoms can be held in independent harmonic traps with given frequencies, and only the lowest two vibrational states per trap matter.
    Idealized trapping; experiments have anharmonic corrections and possible anti-trapping of Rydberg atoms for some species.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transferring vibrational states of trapped atoms via a Rydberg electron." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZOMHHOX

@misc{pith2026241219016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transferring vibrational states of trapped atoms via a Rydberg electron},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZOMHHOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19016}
}
read the original abstract

We show theoretically that it is possible to coherently transfer vibrational excitation between trapped neutral atoms over a micrometer apart. To this end we consider three atoms, where two are in the electronic ground state and one is excited to a Rydberg state whose electronic orbital overlaps with the positional wave functions of the two ground-state atoms. The resulting scattering of the Rydberg electron with the ground-state atoms provides the interaction required to transfer vibrational excitation from one trapped atom to the other. By numerically investigating the dependence of the transfer dynamics on the distance between traps and their relative frequencies we find that there is a "sweet spot" where the transfer of a vibrational excitation is nearly perfect and fast compared to the Rydberg lifetime. We investigate the robustness of this scenario with respect to changes of the parameters. In addition, we derive a intuitive effective Hamiltonian which explains the observed dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19016 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Sketch of the setup and coordinate system (not to scale). The center of mass coordinates R⃗ i of the atoms are given with respect to the center Oi of the respective trap. The position vector of the Rydberg electron ⃗re is given w.r.t. the ion core. The distance vectors between the outer traps and the middle trap are D⃗ i = O⃗ i − O⃗ 0. (b) For tight trapping along the y- and z-axes, the system is effectively one… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Population dynamics of the most relevant states and coupling matrix elements. In each row a different value of ω0 ω is shown; in all panels, ω = 2π×32 kHz. In each column a different value of D within the outer lobe of the Rydberg atom is chosen. (b) The separation dependence of the coefficients T n0,ni n ′ 0 ,n′ i , defined in equation (7), is shown for the same values of ω0/ω used in (a). The labels in the leg… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Robustness of the fast state transfer of figure 1(c) against variations in ω0 and D. (a) Population dynamics. Each row is for a fixed ω0 (provided in the figure) and contains dynamics for 4 different distances D (given in each panel). (b) Top: Time T when the vibrational excitation probability P2(t) on trap 2 reaches its first maximum as function of D. Bottom: The population corresponding to this maximum. are presen… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Traps i = 1 and i = 2 contain the ground state atoms and trap i = 0, in the center, the Rydberg atom

    Theoretical description We consider three harmonic traps located at positions ⃗Oi. Traps i = 1 and i = 2 contain the ground state atoms and trap i = 0, in the center, the Rydberg atom. With ⃗Ri≡ (Xi,Yi,Zi) we denote the center-of-mass coordinates of the ith atom with respect to its respective trap centre ⃗Oi. With ⃗ re we denote the position of the Rydber...

    work page

  2. [3]

    We expand the wave function in the basis |n1,n 0,n 2⟩ defined above, writing|Ψ(t)⟩ = ∑ n1,n0,n2 cn1,n0,n2(t)|n1,n 0,n 2⟩

    Dynamics of vibrational excitation transfer To determine the time evolution, we solve the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation iℏ∂ ∂t Ψ(⃗R1,⃗R0,⃗R2;t) = HtotΨ(⃗R1,⃗R0,⃗R2;t). We expand the wave function in the basis |n1,n 0,n 2⟩ defined above, writing|Ψ(t)⟩ = ∑ n1,n0,n2 cn1,n0,n2(t)|n1,n 0,n 2⟩. In the following plots we will focus on the populations |cn...

    work page

  3. [4]

    Conclusions In this article, we have investigated the possibility that the vibrational excitation of trapped neutral atoms can be transferred from one trap to another, even across micrometer-scale distances, using the scattering of a Rydberg electron off of the neutral atoms. We have focused on the situation where the traps are arranged collinearly and wh...

    work page

  4. [5]

    Norcia, A

    M. Norcia, A. Young and A. Kaufman; Microscopic control and detection of ultracold strontium in optical-tweezer arrays; Physical Review X 8 041054 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [6]

    Endres, H

    M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner and M. D. Lukin; Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays; Science 354 1024 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    A. M. Kaufman, B. J. Lester, C. M. Reynolds, M. L. Wall, M. Foss-Feig, K. Hazzard, A. Rey and C. Regal; Two-particle quantum interference in tunnel-coupled optical tweezers; Science 345 306 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [8]

    J. D. Thompson, T. Tiecke, A. S. Zibrov, V. Vuleti´ c and M. D. Lukin; Coherence and Raman sideband cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer; Physical Review Retters 110 133001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [9]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, M. Wirth, M. S. Safronova, S. Weber and F. Meinert; Motional ground-state cooling of single atoms in state-dependent optical tweezers; Physical Review Research 5 033093 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 69 references
  1. [10]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni; Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules; Nature Physics 17 1324 (2021)

    2021

  2. [11]

    Nogrette, H

    F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. B´ eguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye and A. Browaeys; Single-atom trapping in holographic 2D arrays of microtraps with arbitrary geometries; Physical Review X 4 021034 (2014)

    2014

  3. [12]

    Schlosser, G

    N. Schlosser, G. Reymond, I. Protsenko and P. Grangier; Sub-poissonian loading of single atoms in a microscopic dipole trap; Nature 411 1024 (2001)

    2001

  4. [13]

    Fung and M

    Y. Fung and M. Andersen; Efficient collisional blockade loading of a single atom into a tight microtrap; New Journal of Physics 17 073011 (2015)

    2015

  5. [14]

    Beterov, I

    I. Beterov, I. Ryabtsev, D. Tretyakov and V. Entin; Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody-radiation-induced depopulation rates and effective lifetimes of Rydberg n S, n P, and n D alkali-metal atoms with n≤ 80; Physical Review A 79 052504 (2009)

    2009

  6. [15]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Boulier, A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye; Three-dimensional trapping of individual Rydberg atoms in ponderomotive bottle beam traps; Physical Review Letters 124 023201 (2020)

    2020

  7. [16]

    Mohan, R

    M. Mohan, R. de Keijzer and S. Kokkelmans; Robust control and optimal Rydberg states for neutral atom two-qubit gates; Physical Review Research 5 033052 (2023)

    2023

  8. [17]

    A. P. Burgers, S. Ma, S. Saskin, J. Wilson, M. A. Alarc´ on, C. H. Greene and J. D. Thompson; Controlling Rydberg excitations using ion-core transitions in alkaline-earth atom-tweezer arrays; PRX Quantum 3 020326 (2022)

    2022

  9. [18]

    S. R. Cohen and J. D. Thompson; Quantum computing with circular Rydberg atoms; PRX Quantum 2 030322 (2021)

    2021

  10. [19]

    I. Cong, H. Levine, A. Keesling, D. Bluvstein, S.-T. Wang and M. D. Lukin; Hardware-efficient, fault-tolerant quantum computation with Rydberg atoms; Physical Review X 12 021049 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    Saffman; Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges; Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49 202001 (2016)

    M. Saffman; Quantum computing with atomic qubits and Rydberg interactions: progress and challenges; Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49 202001 (2016)

    2016

  12. [21]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker and K. Mølmer; Quantum information with Rydberg atoms; Reviews of Modern Physics 82 2313 (2010)

    2010

  13. [22]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo et al.; Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar Rydberg atom array; Nature 621 728 (2023)

    2023

  14. [23]

    Norcia, H

    M. Norcia, H. Kim, W. Cairncross, M. Stone, A. Ryou, M. Jaffe, M. Brown, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, T. Bohdanowicz et al.; Iterative Assembly of 171 Yb Atom Arrays with Cavity-Enhanced Optical Lattices; PRX Quantum 5 030316 (2024)

    2024

  15. [24]

    H¨ olzl, A

    C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, E. Pultinevicius, M. Wirth and F. Meinert;Long-lived circular Rydberg qubits of alkaline-earth atoms in optical tweezers; Physical Review X 14 021024 (2024)

    2024

  16. [25]

    Unnikrishnan, P

    G. Unnikrishnan, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, A. Scholz, C. H¨ olzl, A. G¨ otzelmann, R. K. Gupta, J. Zhao, J. Krauter, Transfer of vibrations via a Rydberg electron 15 S. Weber, N. Makki et al.; Coherent control of the fine-structure qubit in a single alkaline-earth atom; Physical Review L...

    2024

  17. [26]

    Srakaew, P

    K. Srakaew, P. Weckesser, S. Hollerith, D. Wei, D. Adler, I. Bloch and J. Zeiher; A subwavelength atomic array switched by a single Rydberg atom; Nature Physics 19 714 (2023)

    2023

  18. [27]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee et al.; Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array; Nature 616 691 (2023)

    2023

  19. [28]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye et al.; Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms; Nature 595 233 (2021)

    2021

  20. [30]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner et al.; Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator; Nature 551 579 (2017)

    2017

  21. [31]

    Signoles, T

    A. Signoles, T. Franz, R. Ferracini Alves, M. G¨ arttner, S. Whitlock, G. Z¨ urn and M. Weidem¨ uller; Glassy dynamics in a disordered Heisenberg quantum spin system; Phys. Rev. Lett. 11 011011 (2021)

    2021

  22. [32]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kalinowski, R. Samajdar et al.; Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator; Science 374 1242 (2021)

    2021

  23. [33]

    De L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. De L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. Weber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye and A. Browaeys; Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms; Science 365 775 (2019)

    2019

  24. [34]

    W¨ uster, C

    S. W¨ uster, C. Ates, A. Eisfeld and J.-M. Rost; Excitation transport through Rydberg dressing; New Journal of Physics 13 073044 (2011)

    2011

  25. [35]

    D. W. Sch¨ onleber, A. Eisfeld, M. Genkin, S. Whitlock and S. W¨ uster; Quantum Simulation of Energy Transport with Embedded Rydberg Aggregates; Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 123005 (2015)

    2015

  26. [36]

    Mukherjee, H

    K. Mukherjee, H. P. Goswami, S. Whitlock, S. W¨ uster and A. Eisfeld; Two-dimensional spectroscopy of Rydberg gases; New Journal of Physics 22 073040 (2020)

    2020

  27. [37]

    Morgado and S

    M. Morgado and S. Whitlock; Quantum simulation and computing with Rydberg-interacting qubits; A VS Quantum Science3 (2021)

    2021

  28. [38]

    T. L. Nguyen, J.-M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortinas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux et al.; Towards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms; Physical Review X 8 011032 (2018)

    2018

  29. [39]

    Schauss; Quantum simulation of transverse Ising models with Rydberg atoms; Quantum Science and Technology 3 023001 (2018)

    P. Schauss; Quantum simulation of transverse Ising models with Rydberg atoms; Quantum Science and Technology 3 023001 (2018)

    2018

  30. [40]

    Scholl, A

    P. Scholl, A. L. Shaw, R. B.-S. Tsai, R. Finkelstein, J. Choi and M. Endres; Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity Rydberg quantum simulator; Nature 622 273 (2023)

    2023

  31. [41]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye; Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms; Nature Physics 16 132 (2020)

    2020

  32. [42]

    Bhowmik, M

    A. Bhowmik, M. Gaudesius, G. Biedermann and D. Blume; Double, triple, and quadruple magic wavelengths for cesium ground, excited, and Rydberg states; Physical Review A 110 043114 (2024)

    2024

  33. [43]

    Lampen, H

    J. Lampen, H. Nguyen, L. Li, P. R. Berman and A. Kuzmich; Long-lived coherence between ground and Rydberg levels in a magic-wavelength lattice; Phys. Rev. A 98 033411 (2018)

    2018

  34. [44]

    Wilson, S

    J. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. Burgers and J. Thompson; Trapping alkaline earth Rydberg atoms optical tweezer arrays; Physical Review Retters 128 033201 (2022)

    2022

  35. [45]

    Corti˜ nas, M

    R. Corti˜ nas, M. Favier, B. Ravon, P. M´ ehaignerie, Y. Machu, J. Raimond, C. Sayrin and M. Brune; Laser trapping of circular Rydberg atoms; Physical Review Letters 124 123201 (2020)

    2020

  36. [46]

    T. l. C. Jansen and J. Knoester; Waiting time dynamics in two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy; Transfer of vibrations via a Rydberg electron 16 Accounts of chemical research 42 1405 (2009)

    2009

  37. [47]

    C. R. Baiz, B. B/suppress lasiak, J. Bredenbeck, M. Cho, J.-H. Choi, S. A. Corcelli, A. G. Dijkstra, C.-J. Feng, S. Garrett-Roe, N.-H. Ge et al.; Vibrational spectroscopic map, vibrational spectroscopy, and intermolecular interaction; Chemical Reviews 120 7152 (2020)

    2020

  38. [48]

    Fermi; Sopra lo Spostamento per Pressione delle Righe Elevate delle Serie Spettrali; Il Nuovo Cimento 11 157 (1934)

    E. Fermi; Sopra lo Spostamento per Pressione delle Righe Elevate delle Serie Spettrali; Il Nuovo Cimento 11 157 (1934)

    1934

  39. [49]

    C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson and H. R. Sadeghpour; Creation of Polar and Nonpolar Ultra-Long-Range Rydberg Molecules; Physical Review Letters 85 2458 (2000)

    2000

  40. [50]

    A. A. Khuskivadze, M. I. Chibisov and I. I. Fabrikant; Adiabatic energy levels and electric dipole moments of Rydberg states of Rb2 and Cs2 dimers; Physical Review A 66 042709 (2002)

    2002

  41. [51]

    Bendkowsky, B

    V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, J. P. Shaffer, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, W. Li, J. Stanojevic, T. Pohl and J. M. Rost; Rydberg Trimers and Excited Dimers Bound by Internal Quantum Reflection; Physical Review Letters 105 163201 (2010)

    2010

  42. [52]

    C. Fey, F. Hummel and P. Schmelcher; Ultralong-range Rydberg molecules; Molecular Physics 118 e1679401 (2020)

    2020

  43. [53]

    Niederpr¨ um, O

    T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas, T. Eichert, C. Lippe, J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, C. H. Greene and H. Ott; Observation of pendular butterfly Rydberg molecules; Nature communications 7 12820 (2016)

    2016

  44. [54]

    Peper and J

    M. Peper and J. Deiglmayr; Heteronuclear Long-Range Rydberg Molecules; Physical Review Letters 126 013001 (2021)

    2021

  45. [55]

    Booth, S

    D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadeghpour and J. P. Shaffer; Production of trilobite Rydberg molecule dimers with kilo-Debye permanent electric dipole moments; Science 348 99 (2015)

    2015

  46. [56]

    M. T. Eiles; Trilobites, butterflies, and other exotic specimens of long-range Rydberg molecules; Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52 113001 (2019)

    2019

  47. [57]

    Guttridge, D

    A. Guttridge, D. K. Ruttley, A. C. Baldock, R. Gonz´ alez-F´ erez, H. Sadeghpour, C. Adams and S. L. Cornish; Observation of Rydberg blockade due to the charge-dipole interaction between an atom and a polar molecule; Physical Review Letters 131 013401 (2023)

    2023

  48. [58]

    Manthey, T

    T. Manthey, T. Niederpr¨ um, O. Thomas and H. Ott; Dynamically probing ultracold lattice gases via Rydberg molecules; New Journal of Physics 17 103024 (2015)

    2015

  49. [59]

    M. T. Eiles, A. Eisfeld and J. M. Rost; Anderson localization of a Rydberg electron; Phys. Rev. Res. 5 033032 (2023)

    2023

  50. [60]

    A. L. Hunter, M. T. Eiles, A. Eisfeld and J. M. Rost; Rydberg composites; Physical Review X 10 031046 (2020)

    2020

  51. [61]

    M. T. Eiles, C. W. W¨ achtler, A. Eisfeld and J. M. Rost; Topological edge states in a Rydberg composite; Phys. Rev. B 109 075422 (2024)

    2024

  52. [63]

    Saffman and T

    M. Saffman and T. G. Walker; Analysis of a quantum logic device based on dipole-dipole interactions of optically trapped Rydberg atoms; Phys. Rev. A 72 022347 (2005)

    2005

  53. [64]

    J. T. Wilson, S. Saskin, Y. Meng, S. Ma, R. Dilip, A. P. Burgers and J. D. Thompson; Trapping Alkaline Earth Rydberg Atoms Optical Tweezer Arrays; Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 033201 (2022)

    2022

  54. [65]

    I. S. Madjarov, J. P. Covey, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, A. Kale, A. Cooper, H. Pichler, V. Schkolnik, J. R. Williams and M. Endres; High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms; Nature Physics 16 857 (2020)

    2020

  55. [66]

    Shaffer, S

    J. Shaffer, S. Rittenhouse and H. Sadeghpour; Ultracold Rydberg molecules; Nature Communications 9 1965 (2018)

    2018

  56. [67]

    Giannakeas, M

    P. Giannakeas, M. T. Eiles, F. Robicheaux and J. M. Rost; Generalized local frame-transformation theory for ultralong-range Rydberg molecules; Phys. Rev. A 102 033315 (2020)

    2020

  57. [68]

    Bouchoule and K

    I. Bouchoule and K. Mølmer; Spin squeezing of atoms by the dipole interaction in virtually excited Rydberg states; Phys. Rev. A 65 041803 (2002). Transfer of vibrations via a Rydberg electron 17

    2002

  58. [69]

    J. B. Balewski, A. T. Krupp, A. Gaj, S. Hofferberth, R. L¨ ow and T. Pfau; Rydberg dressing: understanding of collective many-body effects and implications for experiments; New Journal of Physics 16 063012 (2014)

    2014

  59. [70]

    C. Gaul, B. J. DeSalvo, J. A. Aman, F. B. Dunning, T. C. Killian and T. Pohl; Resonant Rydberg Dressing of Alkaline-Earth Atoms via Electromagnetically Induced Transparency; Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 243001 (2016)

    2016

  60. [71]

    Visscher, S

    K. Visscher, S. P. Gross and S. M. Block; Construction of multiple-beam optical traps with nanometer-resolution position sensing; IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics 2 1066 (1996)

    1996

  61. [72]

    Catal` a-Castro and E

    F. Catal` a-Castro and E. Mart ´ ın-Badosa; Positioning accuracy in holographic optical traps; Micromachines 12 559 (2021). Supplementary Material ————————————– Transferring vibrational states of trapped atoms via a Rydberg electron Abhijit Pendse1, Sebastian W¨ uster2, Matthe...

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.