Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 90 references

Dark matter from axion and small neutrino mass

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Dirac fermion produced by UV freeze-in through the axion portal can supply the full dark matter relic density in an unexcluded window of mass and axion scale.

desk verdict A workmanlike KSVZ-plus-freeze-in model paper, but the isocurvature bound is handled by setting fI = 10^17 GeV when the single PQ field in the model gives fI = fa ~ 10^10 GeV. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19094 v3 pith:LISMKXPT submitted 2024-12-26 hep-ph

Shivam Gola This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 95.35.+d14.80.Va14.60.Pq
keywords darkmatterFIMPUVfreeze-inQCDaxionPeccei-QuinnsymmetryDiracneutrinomassKSVZmodelportal
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a single extension of the Standard Model that tackles three open problems at once: the strong CP problem, the smallness of neutrino masses, and the particle identity of dark matter. The proposal is a KSVZ-like model in which a Peccei-Quinn symmetry generates the QCD axion, forbids Majorana neutrino masses so neutrinos are Dirac, and opens an axion portal to a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-stable Dirac fermion. The central result is that this fermion, produced by UV freeze-in, can supply the full observed relic abundance $\Omega_\psi h^2 \approx 0.12$ for masses around 1 to 10 TeV with axion decay constant around $10^{10}$ to $10^{11}$ GeV and reheating temperature $10^8$ GeV, while staying clear of current axion, direct-detection, and isocurvature limits. The paper also shows that the axion itself can contribute through misalignment, making a two-component dark matter scenario possible. If correct, the model would connect three otherwise separate mysteries to one symmetry-breaking scale.

What carries the argument

The engine of the model is the axion portal: after PQ breaking, the pseudoscalar axion $a$ emerges from the phase of $\Phi$ and couples derivatively to the dark fermion $\psi$, the heavy quark $Q$, and neutrinos with strength set by $1/f_a$. These derivative couplings, combined with $f_a \gtrsim 10^{10}$ GeV, keep $\psi$ out of thermal equilibrium with the quark-gluon plasma, while axion production channels such as $G G \to G a$ can thermalize axions at temperatures above about $10^9$ GeV; the coupled Boltzmann equations then track both yields. The same PQ symmetry forbids Majorana neutrino masses while allowing the Dirac Yukawa coupling $\bar{\ell}_L \tilde{H}_2 \nu_R$, giving $m_\nu = y_\nu v_{H_2}/\sqrt{2}$ with $v_{H_2} = 10^{-9}$ GeV. Direct detection is suppressed by the $\gamma_5$ derivative structure of the portal, which produces a $q^4$ momentum suppression on top of the $f_a^{-2}$ factor.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to establish the timing of PQ breaking: if axion dark matter is found with $f_a$ below about $10^{10}$ GeV, or if axion minicluster or string-wall signals show that PQ broke after inflation, the assumed $f_a > T_{\rm RH}$ regime is wrong and the FIMP-only relic calculation collapses. Alternatively, a measurement of the axion-photon coupling $|g_{a\gamma}|$ in the model's predicted range around $10^{-14}$ to $10^{-12}$ GeV$^{-1}$ at the corresponding axion masses would test the plotted parameter space directly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a KSVZ-like extension containing a Dirac fermion $\psi$, three right-handed neutrinos, a PQ-charged second Higgs doublet, a complex scalar $\Phi$, and a vector-like heavy quark can solve the strong CP problem, give small Dirac neutrino masses, and supply dark matter all at once. The paper argues that $\psi$, stabilized by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry, is produced out of equilibrium through the axion portal via derivative couplings suppressed by $1/f_a$, and that solving the coupled Boltzmann equations for $\psi$ and the axion yields $\Omega_\psi h^2 \approx 0.12$ for $m_\psi$ around 1 to 10 TeV and $f_a$ around $10^{10}$ to $10^{11}$ GeV with reheating temperature $T_{\rm RH} = 10^8$ GeV. It further argues that this FIMP-only solution satisfies current axion-photon, direct-detection, and isocurvature constraints, and that adding misalignment-produced axions with $\theta_i = 0.1$ or $1$, $H_I = 10^{14}$ GeV, and $f_I = 10^{17}$ GeV admits a two-component dark matter scenario whose total relic abundance also fits the observation.

Load-bearing premise

The parameter space presupposes that PQ symmetry broke before or during inflation, with $f_a > T_{\rm RH} = 10^8$ GeV, $H_I = 10^{14}$ GeV, and $f_I = 10^{17}$ GeV; the paper explicitly discards the post-inflationary case where strings, domain walls, and thermalized axions could shift the dark matter budget and invalidate the FIMP-only claim.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, a single PQ-breaking sector accounts for the strong CP problem, small Dirac neutrino masses, and the observed dark matter abundance without WIMP-scale couplings.
  • The FIMP mass is predicted to lie near 1 to 10 TeV when $f_a$ is around $10^{10}$ to $10^{11}$ GeV and $T_{\rm RH} = 10^8$ GeV; lower $f_a$ requires a lighter $\psi$ and is more tightly constrained by axion searches.
  • The axion can also be dark matter via misalignment, so the model admits a two-component dark matter sector; for $\theta_i = 1$ and the chosen inflationary parameters, the axion relic can rival the FIMP relic.
  • Direct detection experiments such as LUX and XENON1T cannot see this dark matter because the scattering cross section is suppressed by $q^4/f_a^2$, leaving indirect or axion-mediated signatures as the main observational channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence the paper leaves implicit is that because the ratio $E/N$ vanishes in this model, the axion-photon coupling is suppressed relative to standard KSVZ, making near-future haloscopes and helioscopes less likely to see this axion; a positive axion-photon detection would point away from this specific construction.
  • If PQ symmetry broke after inflation, axion production from strings and domain walls would likely exceed the FIMP abundance in the 1 to 10 TeV window, so observing axion minicluster or string-wall signatures would disfavor the single-FIMP interpretation.
  • The paper's neutrino masses are purely Dirac; an observation of neutrinoless double beta decay would require adding a Majorana source, breaking the link the paper draws between PQ symmetry and the absence of Majorana masses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a KSVZ-like extension of the Standard Model with Peccei-Quinn (PQ) symmetry, adding a complex scalar Φ, a vector-like heavy quark Q, a second Higgs doublet H2, a Dirac fermion ψ, and three right-handed neutrinos. PQ symmetry generates the QCD axion, gives Dirac masses to neutrinos via the small H2 VEV, and, together with a Z2 symmetry, stabilizes ψ. The dark matter candidate ψ is produced by UV freeze-in through axion-portal interactions. The author solves the coupled Boltzmann equations for ψ and the axion, identifies parameter space in (mψ, fa) around (1–10 TeV, 10^10–10^11 GeV) for TRH = 10^8 GeV that reproduces Ωψh2 ≈ 0.12, and compares with axion and direct-detection bounds. The paper also estimates the non-thermal (misalignment) axion relic and claims the combined two-DM scenario respects isocurvature constraints.

Significance. If the results hold, the model offers an economical simultaneous solution to strong CP, neutrino mass, and dark matter, and it provides a concrete UV-freeze-in setup with analytic cross sections. The paper correctly uses standard Boltzmann equations and lists explicit cross-section expressions in the appendices; it also transparently states its assumption that PQ breaking occurs before/during inflation. However, the cosmological viability of the claimed parameter space is not established because the isocurvature analysis relies on an unjustified inflation-era decay constant f_I, and the quoted isocurvature inequality in Eq. (3.6) is not the standard expression for the axion isocurvature relative to curvature fluctuations. These issues are load-bearing for the central claim that the FIMP parameter space is not excluded.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6); Table 1] The isocurvature constraint is not satisfied within the model as written. The axion decay constant is fixed by the single PQ-charged scalar Φ in Eq. (2.12), fa ≈ x_Φ v_Φ, and the FIMP relic-density region of Fig. 3 requires v_Φ ≈ 10^10–10^11 GeV. The paper nevertheless sets f_I = 10^17 GeV in Eq. (3.6) with the comment that 'a larger fI (> fa) is important to suppress these fluctuations,' but no field content or coupling in Table 1 can produce an inflation-era decay constant three orders of magnitude larger than fa. If the physical identification f_I = fa is imposed, the standard isocurvature ratio P_a/P_r = (Ω_a/0.12)^2 (H_I/(π f_a θ_i))^2 / P_r, with Ω_a from Eq. (3.5), exceeds the Planck bound P_a/P_r ≤ 0.04 by many orders of magnitude (for fa = 10^10 GeV, H_I = 10^14 GeV, θ_i = 1, and Ω_a ≈ 5×10^-4, the ratio is O(10^10)). Moreover, Eq. (3.6) as written is not the standard definition of P_a/P_r; the usual expression divides by the curvature power amplitude P_r ≈ 2×10^-9, which makes the discrepancy even larger. The statement that the FIMP parameter space is 'not excluded' by isocurvature is therefore unsupported unless a concrete mechanism producing f_I ≫ fa is supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.3] The paper explicitly excludes the post-inflationary PQ-breaking scenario (fa < TRH) because axions could thermalize and affect the FIMP analysis. This is a genuine limitation of the claimed parameter space, and it should be stated more prominently as an assumption limiting the validity of all conclusions to pre-inflationary PQ breaking.
  2. [Figure 1] The caption lists five curves ('black, green, blue, pink, and red') but only three process categories are named ('DM - axion, DM - gluon, and axion - gluon'). Each curve (Hubble, aa→ψψ, ψψ→gg, aa→gg, GG→Ga) should be identified explicitly by color.
  3. [Sections 3.1–3.2] The numerical solution of the coupled Boltzmann equations is not described beyond stating that they are solved numerically; providing the integration method, precision criteria, and initial conditions would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Figures 3 and 4] The FIMP contour in the (mψ, |gaγ|) plane is overlaid on the axion-mass plane in Fig. 4 via Eq. (2.13); this mapping should be stated in the caption so that the reader can follow the conversion.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'isocuravture' should be 'isocurvature', 'Similalry' should be 'Similarly', 'boltzmann' should be 'Boltzmann', and 'T able 1' in the Table 1 caption should be 'Table 1'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FIMP relic abundance is computed from the Boltzmann equations with the model couplings, and the observed relic density is used only as a posterior constraint.

full rationale

The paper's central FIMP calculation is self-contained. The Lagrangian in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.4) fixes the axion and fermion couplings through fa = x_Phi sqrt(v_H2^2 + v_Phi^2) (Eq. 2.12), and the relic abundance is obtained by numerically integrating the coupled Boltzmann equations (3.4) with initial abundances set to zero, then compared with the Planck measurement (1.1). No parameter is defined as the value needed to reproduce Omega_DM h^2, and the allowed contour in Fig. 3 is a computed locus, not a fit renamed as a prediction. The axion misalignment contribution uses the standard formula (3.5) with externally specified cosmological inputs; the isocurvature check (3.6) is applied as a constraint rather than used to define the FIMP abundance. The paper does cite the author's earlier work [41,43], but only for standard pseudoscalar-mediated direct-detection suppression, which is not load-bearing here. A physical consistency concern — namely that f_I = 10^17 GeV is adopted independently of the low-energy fa determined by the single PQ-breaking scalar — is a correctness/assumption issue about whether the isocurvature bound is actually satisfied, not a circular reduction, because the FIMP yield itself is computed before that inequality is imposed. Likewise, the deliberate exclusion of the post-inflationary PQ-breaking case is a stated boundary condition, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 4 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large set of hand-picked inputs: fa, mψ, TRH, vH2, θi, HI, fI, and xΦ. The relic density calculation then converts these into an allowed contour. The main cosmological assumption is the pre-inflationary PQ-breaking scenario, which excludes a whole class of histories. The new physics entities (ψ, H2, Q, νR) are standard model-building ingredients without independent experimental handles.

free parameters (8)
  • fa (Peccei-Quinn scale) = approximately 10^10-10^11 GeV from relic contours in Fig. 3
    Axion decay constant input of the model; the relic density calculation constrains it as a function of mψ. It is not fixed by any independent measurement.
  • mψ (dark matter mass) = approximately 1-10 TeV from Fig. 3
    Dirac fermion mass from the Yukawa yψ and the PQ scalar VEV; scanned together with fa to reproduce the observed relic density.
  • TRH (reheating temperature) = 10^8 GeV
    Reheating temperature chosen to keep the axion out of thermal equilibrium and to generate the UV freeze-in yield. The relic density result depends directly on this choice.
  • vH2 (second Higgs doublet VEV) = 10^-9 GeV
    Set to give small Dirac neutrino masses while keeping SM fermion masses from H1. Not derived from the scalar potential.
  • θi (initial misalignment angle) = 0.1 or 1
    Free parameter controlling the non-thermal axion relic in eq. (3.5); chosen values satisfy the isocurvature bound in eq. (3.6).
  • HI (Hubble scale during inflation) = 10^14 GeV
    Chosen to keep axion quantum fluctuations within the isocurvature bound for fI = 10^17 GeV in eq. (3.6).
  • fI (axion decay constant during inflation) = 10^17 GeV
    Chosen to suppress the isocurvature fluctuation contribution in eq. (3.6).
  • xΦ (PQ charge of Φ) = 1
    PQ charge normalized to 1; the axion couplings scale linearly with this charge. Adopted for the whole analysis.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption PQ symmetry is a good global symmetry at tree level, broken only by the QCD anomaly; no significant explicit PQ-breaking operator is present.
    Section 2: the tree-level Lagrangian is invariant under U(1)PQ; the axion solution to strong CP requires this symmetry to be exact to very high precision, which the paper does not discuss.
  • domain assumption The scalar potential has a minimum with the hierarchy vH2 << vH1 << vΦ and specified VEVs (vH1 ≈ 246 GeV, vH2 = 10^-9 GeV, vΦ ≈ fa).
    Section 2, eqs. (2.4)-(2.5); the small vH2 is imposed, not derived, and the required fine-tuning is not analyzed.
  • domain assumption The Z2 symmetry is exact and stabilizes the Dirac fermion ψ, and no other Z2-odd states exist.
    Section 2, table 1 and LDM; stability of the DM candidate is assumed.
  • domain assumption The cosmological history has PQ breaking before or during inflation with fa > TRH, so axion strings and domain walls are diluted.
    Section 3.3, after eq. (3.6); the post-inflationary case is excluded by hand.
  • domain assumption The heavy quark Q and additional scalars are heavier than TRH and do not participate in the thermal bath; only SM fields, axions, and ψ are relevant for freeze-in.
    Section 3.2: 'all interactions mediated by heavy quarks Q are suppressed too and thus neglected.'
  • standard math Standard cosmology: entropy conservation, radiation-dominated expansion with SM energy density, and the Standard Model particle content in thermal equilibrium.
    Section 3.1, Boltzmann equations in the FRW metric and the definition of H and ρ.
  • standard math Thermal rates for axion production from the quark-gluon plasma (gg, qg -> a + X) are taken from Refs. [64-66].
    Section 3.2: 'We used interaction rate estimates from studies in Refs.[64-66]'. These are external results, not rederived.
invented entities (4)
  • Dirac fermion ψ (dark matter)
    purpose: Stable DM candidate produced via UV freeze-in through the axion portal.
    No unique experimental signature is predicted beyond the generic axion parameter space; direct detection is suppressed and there is no decay or collider handle.
  • Second Higgs doublet H2 with tiny VEV
    purpose: Generates small Dirac neutrino masses through yν L ilde H2 νR and contributes to the axion coupling to neutrinos.
    The VEV is chosen as 10^-9 GeV; no distinct collider or low-energy observable is identified.
  • Vector-like heavy quark Q
    purpose: Generates the QCD anomaly that gives the axion its mass and gluon coupling (KSVZ mechanism).
    Standard KSVZ ingredient; its mass is not specified and it is too heavy to be produced at accessible energies.
  • Three right-handed neutrinos νR
    purpose: Complete Dirac neutrino mass terms; no Majorana mass because of PQ symmetry.
    No new interactions beyond the tiny Yukawa to H2; no observable signal is discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dark matter from axion and small neutrino mass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LISMKXPT

@misc{pith2026241219094,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dark matter from axion and small neutrino mass},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LISMKXPT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19094}
}
abstract

We explore a KSVZ-like extension of the Standard Model with a Dirac fermion and three right-handed neutrinos. PQ symmetry allows the Dirac mass for neutrinos and prevents the Majorana mass. A $\mathcal{Z}_2$ symmetry guarantees the stability of Dirac fermion dark matter. The breakdown of PQ symmetry generates the QCD axion at a high scale. The fermion dark matter relic abundance arises from the UV-freeze-in mechanism through the axion portal. We determine the fermion DM relic by solving the coupled Boltzmann equations and finding the allowed parameter space using the relic density constraints. Having determined the allowed parameter space for fermion DM, we also look for non-thermal axion production schemes to seek the two DM possibility. We find that FIMP alone is a suitable dark matter that is not excluded while considering several current bounds and future sensitivities on axion and dark matter. Our study highlights the interlinking of dark matter, axion, and neutrinos while addressing the strong CP problem and small neutrino masses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zwicky, On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae , apj 86 (1937) 217

    F. Zwicky, On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae , apj 86 (1937) 217

    1937

  2. [2]

    Rubin, W.K

    V.C. Rubin, W.K. Ford and N. Thonnard, Rotational properties of 21 sc galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from ngc 4605 /r = 4kpc/ to ugc 2885 /r = 122 kpc/ , The Astrophysical Journal 238 (1980) 471

    1980

  3. [3]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradaˇ c, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones et al., A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter , The Astrophysical Journal 648 (2006) L109–L113. – 14 –

    2006

  4. [4]

    Walsh, R.F

    D. Walsh, R.F. Carswell and R.J. Weymann, 0957+561 A, B: twin quasistellar objects or gravitational lens?, nat 279 (1979) 381

    1979

  5. [5]

    Penzias and R.W

    A.A. Penzias and R.W. Wilson, A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s., apj 142 (1965) 419

    1965

  6. [6]

    WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results , Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 19 [1212.5226]

    arXiv 2013

  7. [8]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279 [ hep-ph/0404175]

    arXiv 2005

  8. [9]

    Profumo, L

    S. Profumo, L. Giani and O.F. Piattella, An Introduction to Particle Dark Matter , Universe 5 (2019) 213 [ 1910.05610]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 90 references
  1. [10]

    Merle, keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter , PoS NOW2016 (2017) 082 [ 1702.08430]

    A. Merle, keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter , PoS NOW2016 (2017) 082 [ 1702.08430]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Jungman, M

    G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter , Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [ hep-ph/9506380]

    1996 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Schumann, Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: concepts and status , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46 (2019) 103003

    M. Schumann, Direct detection of WIMP dark matter: concepts and status , Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 46 (2019) 103003

    2019

  4. [13]

    Kolb and M.S

    E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, The Early Universe , 1990. 10.1201/9780429492860

    1990 doi

  5. [14]

    PandaX-II collaboration, Dark Matter Results from First 98.7 Days of Data from the PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 121303 [ 1607.07400]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [15]

    LUX collaboration, Results from a search for dark matter in the complete LUX exposure , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 021303 [ 1608.07648]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [16]

    LUX-ZEPLIN collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052002 [ 1802.06039]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [17]

    XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [ 1805.12562]

    2018 arXiv

  9. [18]

    XENON collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment, JCAP 11 (2020) 031 [ 2007.08796]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [19]

    HESS collaboration, Search for γ-Ray Line Signals from Dark Matter Annihilations in the Inner Galactic Halo from 10 Years of Observations with H.E.S.S. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 201101 [ 1805.05741]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [20]

    10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/039

    Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies , feb, 2016. 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/039

    2016 doi

  12. [21]

    Aaboud, G

    M. Aaboud, G. Aad and B. Abbott, Search for dark matter and other new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum using the atlas detector , Journal of High Energy Physics 2018 (2018) . – 15 –

    2018

  13. [22]

    CMS collaboration, Search for narrow and broad dijet resonances in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV and constraints on dark matter mediators and other new particles , JHEP 08 (2018) 130 [ 1806.00843]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [23]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-in production of fimp dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics 2010 (2010)

    2010

  15. [24]

    Bernal, M

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen, The dawn of fimp dark matter: A review of models and constraints , International Journal of Modern Physics A 32 (2017) 1730023

    2017

  16. [25]

    B´ elanger, F

    G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov and B. Zaldivar, micrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 173 [ 1801.03509]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Particle Data Groupcollaboration, Review of Particle Physics , PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01

    2020

  18. [27]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [ 1807.06209]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [28]

    Lattanzi and M

    M. Lattanzi and M. Gerbino, Status of neutrino properties and future prospects - Cosmological and astrophysical constraints, Front. in Phys. 5 (2018) 70 [ 1712.07109]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Peccei, QCD, strong CP and axions , J

    R.D. Peccei, QCD, strong CP and axions , J. Korean Phys. Soc. 29 (1996) S199 [hep-ph/9606475]

    1996 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Kim and G

    J.E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the Strong CP Problem , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 557 [0807.3125]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Hook, TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions , PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    A. Hook, TASI Lectures on the Strong CP Problem and Axions , PoS T ASI2018(2019) 004 [1812.02669]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Lombardo and A

    M.P. Lombardo and A. Trunin, Topology and axions in QCD , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) 2030010 [ 2005.06547]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Irastorza and J

    I.G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 102 (2018) 89–159

    2018

  25. [34]

    Peccei, The Strong CP problem and axions , Lect

    R.D. Peccei, The Strong CP problem and axions , Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 3 [hep-ph/0607268]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson? , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223

    1978

  27. [36]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279

    1978

  28. [37]

    Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys

    J.E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance , Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103

    1979

  29. [38]

    Shifman, A.I

    M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions? , Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493

    1980

  30. [39]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion , Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199. – 16 –

    1981

  31. [40]

    Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter , Phys

    E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter , Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [ hep-ph/0601225]

    2006 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Gola, Pseudo scalar dark matter in a generic U(1)X model , Phys

    S. Gola, Pseudo scalar dark matter in a generic U(1)X model , Phys. Lett. B 842 (2023) 137982 [2212.04698]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Nomura and J

    Y. Nomura and J. Thaler, Dark matter through the axion portal , Physical Review D 79 (2009)

    2009

  34. [43]

    S. Gola, S. Mandal and N. Sinha, ALP-portal majorana dark matter , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 37 (2022) 2250131 [ 2106.00547]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Salvio, A simple motivated completion of the standard model below the planck scale: Axions and right-handed neutrinos , Physics Letters B 743 (2015) 428–434

    A. Salvio, A simple motivated completion of the standard model below the planck scale: Axions and right-handed neutrinos , Physics Letters B 743 (2015) 428–434

    2015

  36. [45]

    Carvajal, B

    C. Carvajal, B. S´ anchez-Vega and O. Zapata,Linking axionlike dark matter to neutrino masses, Physical Review D 96 (2017)

    2017

  37. [46]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit, Standard model—axion—seesaw—higgs portal inflation. five problems of particle physics and cosmology solved in one stroke , Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (2017) 001–001

    2017

  38. [47]

    Peinado, M

    E. Peinado, M. Reig, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Dirac neutrinos from peccei–quinn symmetry: A fresh look at the axion , Modern Physics Letters A 35 (2020) 2050176

    2020

  39. [48]

    Ghosh, A

    D.K. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal and S. Jeesun, Axion-like particle (alp) portal freeze-in dark matter confronting alp search experiments, 2023

    2023

  40. [49]

    Bharucha, F

    A. Bharucha, F. Br¨ ummer, N. Desai and S. Mutzel, Axion-like particles as mediators for dark matter: beyond freeze-out , Journal of High Energy Physics 2023 (2023)

    2023

  41. [50]

    de la Vega, N

    L.M.G. de la Vega, N. Nath and E. Peinado, Dirac neutrinos from Peccei-Quinn symmetry: two examples , Nucl. Phys. B 957 (2020) 115099 [ 2001.01846]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [51]

    W. Chao, M. Jin, H.-J. Li and Y.-Q. Peng, Axion-like dark matter from the type-ii seesaw mechanism, 2022

    2022

  43. [52]

    Berezhiani and M.Y

    Z.G. Berezhiani and M.Y. Khlopov, Cosmology of spontaneously broken gauge family symmetry with axion solution of strong cp-problem , Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik C Particles and Fields 49 (1991) 73

    1991

  44. [53]

    Fitzpatrick, Y

    P.J. Fitzpatrick, Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Ovadia and Y. Soreq, Dark matter through the axion-gluon portal, 2023

    2023

  45. [54]

    Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect

    G.G. Raffelt, Astrophysical axion bounds, Lect. Notes Phys. 741 (2008) 51 [hep-ph/0611350]

    2008 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Friedland, M

    A. Friedland, M. Giannotti and M. Wise, Constraining the Axion-Photon Coupling with Massive Stars , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 061101 [ 1210.1271]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Ayala, I

    A. Ayala, I. Dom ´ ınguez, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and O. Straniero, Revisiting the bound on axion-photon coupling from Globular Clusters , Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 191302 [1406.6053]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Jaeckel and M

    J. Jaeckel and M. Spannowsky, Probing mev to 90 gev axion-like particles with lep and lhc , Physics Letters B 753 (2016) 482–487. – 17 –

    2016

  49. [58]

    Bauer, M

    M. Bauer, M. Heiles, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Axion-Like Particles at Future Colliders , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 74 [ 1808.10323]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [59]

    A. Hook, S. Kumar, Z. Liu and R. Sundrum, High Quality QCD Axion and the LHC , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 221801 [ 1911.12364]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Duffy and K.v

    L.D. Duffy and K.v. Bibber, Axions as dark matter particles , New Journal of Physics 11 (2009) 105008

    2009

  52. [61]

    Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria , Eur

    K. Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria , Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [ 1205.3781]

    2012 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Srednicki, Axion Couplings to Matter

    M. Srednicki, Axion Couplings to Matter. 1. CP Conserving Parts , Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985) 689

    1985

  54. [63]

    Baek, Dirac neutrino from the breaking of peccei-quinn symmetry , Physics Letters B 805 (2020) 135415

    S. Baek, Dirac neutrino from the breaking of peccei-quinn symmetry , Physics Letters B 805 (2020) 135415

    2020

  55. [64]

    Salvio, A

    A. Salvio, A. Strumia and W. Xue, Thermal axion production , arXiv:1310.6982

    arXiv

  56. [65]

    Graf and F.D

    P. Graf and F.D. Steffen, Thermal axion production in the primordial quark-gluon plasma , Physical Review D 83 (2011)

    2011

  57. [66]

    M. Bolz, A. Brandenburg and W. Buchm¨ uller, Thermal production of gravitinos , Nuclear Physics B 606 (2001) 518

    2001

  58. [67]

    13 (2017) 584 [ 1705.02290]

    CAST collaboration, New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction , Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 584 [ 1705.02290]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Raffelt and D

    G. Raffelt and D. Seckel, Bounds on Exotic Particle Interactions from SN 1987a , Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1793

    1988

  60. [69]

    Burrows, M.S

    A. Burrows, M.S. Turner and R.P. Brinkmann, Axions and SN 1987a , Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 1020

    1989

  61. [70]

    Ajello and A.e.a

    M. Ajello and A.e.a. Albert, Search for spectral irregularities due to photon–axionlike-particle oscillations with the fermi large area telescope , Physical Review Letters 116 (2016)

    2016

  62. [71]

    Braine and R.e.a

    T. Braine and R.e.a. Cervantes, Extended search for the invisible axion with the axion dark matter experiment, Physical Review Letters 124 (2020)

    2020

  63. [72]

    Li and X.-J

    S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu, Production rates of dark photons and Z’ in the Sun and stellar cooling bounds, JCAP 09 (2023) 009 [ 2304.12907]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Depta, M

    P.F. Depta, M. Hufnagel and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Robust cosmological constraints on axion-like particles, JCAP 05 (2020) 009 [ 2002.08370]

    2020 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Capozzi, R.Z

    F. Capozzi, R.Z. Ferreira, L. Lopez-Honorez and O. Mena, CMB and Lyman- α constraints on dark matter decays to photons , JCAP 06 (2023) 060 [ 2303.07426]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Budker, P.W

    D. Budker, P.W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran and A.O. Sushkov, Proposal for a cosmic axion spin precession experiment (casper) , Physical Review X 4 (2014)

    2014

  67. [76]

    229–234, 2019 [ 1905.06882]

    ABRACADABRA collaboration, First Results from ABRACADABRA-10cm: A Search for Low-Mass Axion Dark Matter , in 54th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories , pp. 229–234, 2019 [ 1905.06882]. – 18 –

    2019 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Meyer, M

    M. Meyer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi, J. Conrad and M. S´ anchez-Conde, Fermi large area telescope as a galactic supernovae axionscope , Physical Review Letters 118 (2017)

    2017

  69. [78]

    Alesini and B

    D. Alesini and B. et al, The future search for low-frequency axions and new physics with the flash resonant cavity experiment at frascati national laboratories , Physics of the Dark Universe 42 (2023) 101370

    2023

  70. [79]

    S. Lee, S. Ahn, J. Choi, B.R. Ko and Y.K. Semertzidis, Axion Dark Matter Search around 6.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 101802 [ 2001.05102]

    2020 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Caldwell, G

    A. Caldwell, G. Dvali, B. Majorovits, A. Millar, G. Raffelt, J. Redondo et al., Dielectric haloscopes: A new way to detect axion dark matter , Physical Review Letters 118 (2017)

    2017

  72. [81]

    Armengaud and D.e.a

    E. Armengaud and D.e.a. Atti´ e,Physics potential of the international axion observatory (iaxo), Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (2019) 047–047

    2019

  73. [82]

    Ahyoune, A proposal for a low-frequency axion search in the 1–2 muev range and below with the babyiaxo magnet , Annalen der Physik 535 (2023)

    S.e.a. Ahyoune, A proposal for a low-frequency axion search in the 1–2 muev range and below with the babyiaxo magnet , Annalen der Physik 535 (2023)

    2023

  74. [83]

    Cardoso, O.J.C

    V. Cardoso, O.J.C. Dias, G.S. Hartnett, M. Middleton, P. Pani and J.E. Santos, Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like particles through black-hole superradiance, JCAP 03 (2018) 043 [ 1801.01420]

    2018 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Chun, Axion dark matter with high-scale inflation , Physics Letters B 735 (2014) 164–167

    E.J. Chun, Axion dark matter with high-scale inflation , Physics Letters B 735 (2014) 164–167

    2014

  76. [85]

    Choi, K.S

    K. Choi, K.S. Jeong and M.-S. Seo, String theoretic qcd axions in the light of planck and bicep2, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 (2014)

    2014

  77. [86]

    Planck collaboration, Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation , Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A22 [ 1303.5082]

    2014 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Kawasaki, K

    M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi, Axion dark matter from topological defects , Physical Review D 91 (2015) 065014

    2015

  79. [88]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Kawasaki, K. Saikawa and T. Sekiguchi, Production of dark matter axions from collapse of string-wall systems , Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 85 (2012) 105020

    2012

  80. [89]

    Ringwald and K

    A. Ringwald and K. Saikawa, Axion dark matter in the post-inflationary peccei-quinn symmetry breaking scenario, Physical Review D 93 (2016)

    2016

  81. [90]

    Cheng and C.-W

    H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting Scalar and Pseudoscalar Couplings with Nucleons, JHEP 07 (2012) 009 [ 1202.1292]

    2012 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Dolan, F

    M.J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, A taste of dark matter: Flavour constraints on pseudoscalar mediators , JHEP 03 (2015) 171 [ 1412.5174]. – 19 –

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.