Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

AdS S-Matrix for Massive Vector Fields

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new calculation extends the AdS S-matrix framework to massive vector fields, obtaining subleading inverse-radius corrections for four Proca fields exchanging a massive scalar.

desk verdict New massive-vector propagators with a correct flat-space limit; the claimed 1/R^2 amplitude needs a scheme-independence check before it is trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19253 v1 pith:DAU6FYLS submitted 2024-12-26 hep-th

Nabamita Banerjee , Amogh Neelkanth Desai , Karan Fernandes , Arpita Mitra , Tabasum Rahnuma This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords AdSS-matrixmassivevectorfieldsWittendiagrams1/RperturbationtheoryembeddingspaceformalismAbelianHiggsmodelProcafieldbulk-to-boundarypropagator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends a recent construction that gives a well-defined scattering amplitude, called the AdS S-matrix, for massive particles in anti-de Sitter spacetime by working perturbatively in the inverse AdS radius $1/R$ around a small flat region in the bulk. It claims that the same construction works for massive vector fields: it derives the massive-vector bulk-to-boundary and bulk-to-bulk propagators to order $1/R^2$, and computes the amplitude for four massive vector fields exchanging a massive scalar in the Abelian Higgs model. If correct, this gives an explicit spin-1 example of an AdS S-matrix and produces subleading curvature corrections to a flat-space scattering amplitude, which are the kind of small-cosmological-constant corrections needed for soft-theorem and AdS/CFT applications. The calculation uses embedding-space coordinates and a Witten-diagram representation in which the external legs become plane waves with fixed on-shell momenta.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a perturbative Witten-diagram calculus in the embedding-space formulation of global AdS, with the inverse AdS radius $1/R$ as the expansion parameter. Bulk-to-boundary propagators are Fourier transformed to boundary momenta and treated as plane waves $e^{iP\cdot X}$ carrying on-shell momenta $P^2=-M^2$, with $P_{d+1}=0$ fixing the flat patch; the bulk-to-bulk scalar and vector propagators are expanded to order $1/R^2$ (Eqs. (2.22), (2.28)-(2.31), (3.20)). At each vertex and along the exchange propagator, auxiliary momenta and rescalings ($\sigma_i$, $\alpha$) are injected so that all bulk-position dependence becomes derivatives acting on plane waves. The AdS S-matrix $A^{(0)}$ is then defined to be the term proportional to the momentum-conserving delta function $\delta(\sum_i P_i)$; terms involving derivatives of that delta function are assumed, following the scalar construction, to be recovered from $A^{(0)}$ through the conformal Ward identity for $M_{\mu,d+1}=RP_\mu$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the full Witten-diagram expression (3.34) without selecting only the delta-function piece, keeping all derivatives of the momentum-conserving delta function, and check whether the conformal Ward identity for $M_{\mu,d+1}$ applied to $A^{(0)}$ reproduces them order by order in $1/R^2$; a failure, or a change in $A^{(0)}$ when the vertex at $Y$ is integrated before $X$, would show the spin-1 extension is inconsistent.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Witten diagram for four external massive vector fields of mass $M$ exchanging a massive scalar of mass $m_\phi$ in the Abelian Higgs model evaluates, to order $1/R^2$, to the AdS S-matrix $$$A^{{(0)}}$(\{P_i\}) = (g'^2\phi_0)^2\,(\$epsilon_1^{{(0)}}$\cdot\$epsilon_2^{{(0)}}$)(\$epsilon_3^{{(0)}}$\cdot\$epsilon_4^{{(0)}}$)\left[-\frac{1}{s-m_\$phi^{2}$}+\frac{1}{$R^{2}$}(\cdots)\right] - \frac{1}{$R^{2}$}(\$epsilon_3^{{(0)}}$\cdot\$epsilon_4^{{(0)}}$)(\$epsilon_1^{{(0)}}$\cdot P_2)(\$epsilon_2^{{(0)}}$\cdot P_1)\left[\frac{8}{(s-m_\$phi^{2}$)^3}+\frac{4}{$M^{2}$(s-m_\$phi^{2}$)^2}\right],$$ where $s=-(P_1+P_2)^2$ and $(\cdots)$ stands for the four explicit correction terms given in Eq. (3.36). The leading term is exactly the flat-space scalar-exchange amplitude; the $1/R^2$ terms are the subleading curvature corrections about the flat patch. Along the way the paper derives the massive-vector bulk-to-boundary and bulk-to-bulk propagators to order $1/R^2$ and shows that the polarization corrections following from the transversality condition do not contribute to this amplitude at that order.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the subleading $1/R^2$ terms it drops from the Witten diagram, those tied to the vertex at $Y$, to the injected momentum $q$, and to the $p_2$ dependence, are exactly recovered by the symmetry identity for the operator that becomes translation in the flat limit, and that the result does not depend on which bulk vertex is integrated first.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At leading order in $R\to\infty$, the amplitude reduces to the flat-space scalar-exchange amplitude for two pairs of massive vectors, so the construction reproduces the known flat-space S-matrix for this process.
  • At order $1/R^2$, the amplitude contains curvature corrections organized as powers of $1/(s-m_\phi^2)$; these are the leading AdS-potential modifications to the flat-space result and are the paper's new observable content.
  • The derived massive-vector propagators and polarizations can be used directly in other Witten diagrams with external vector legs, not only in the scalar-exchange process treated here.
  • The full boundary correlation function, including terms built from derivatives of the momentum-conserving delta function, is claimed to be recoverable from the delta-function piece via the Ward identity for $M_{\mu,d+1}=RP_\mu$.
  • Taking $M\to 0$ is not possible in this momentum parametrization; the paper shows a double-scaling limit with $MR=\gamma$ fixed gives the vector bulk-to-boundary propagator a small correction that is absent for scalars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Ward-identity recovery of the derivative-of-delta terms holds for spin-1, the same identity can be used to test the consistency of the propagator solutions (2.22) and (2.28)-(2.31) by checking that the full Witten diagram is independent of which bulk vertex is integrated first.
  • The obstruction to a clean massless limit suggests that soft theorems in AdS should be approached through the null-vector parametrization of momenta discussed in the paper; a concrete next step would be to recompute the exchange diagram with that parametrization and compare the resulting soft factors with existing small-cosmological-constant results.
  • The double-scaling correction found for vectors, absent for scalars, indicates that spin-dependent effects enter the flat-limit expansion already at order $1/R^2$; extending the calculation to massive higher-spin fields would show whether a similar pattern holds there.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the 'AdS S-matrix' formalism of Gadde and Sharma [17] from massive scalars to massive vector fields. It derives massive vector bulk-to-boundary and bulk-to-bulk propagators in AdS_{d+1} to subleading order in 1/R perturbation theory, then uses the Abelian Higgs model to compute the AdS S-matrix for the tree-level exchange of a massive scalar between four massive vector external states. The leading large-R term of the resulting amplitude reproduces the flat-space scalar-exchange amplitude, and the subleading 1/R^2 terms are presented as curvature corrections about the flat patch. Section 4 discusses why a direct massless limit is not available in this framework and comments on a double-scaling limit.

Significance. If the 1/R^2 amplitude is correct, this is a useful extension of the AdS S-matrix program to spinning external states, with explicit propagator formulas (Eqs. (2.22) and (2.28)-(2.31)) and a concrete four-point amplitude (Eq. (3.36)) that are not available elsewhere. The paper is careful about the gauge choice P_{d+1}=0, the on-shell condition, and the discarding of the negative-energy solution, and the derivation is presented in enough detail to be checked step by step. The leading flat-space limit is verified. However, the main load-bearing step — the extraction of A(0) in Eq. (3.35) as the coefficient of the delta function — is assumed rather than proven for the vector case, and the ansatz used for the subleading propagator is not shown to be complete. These are correctness risks for the central subleading claim, not mere presentation issues.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (3.33)-(3.35)] The definition of A(0) as the coefficient of the momentum-conserving delta function is not justified. In Eqs. (3.33)-(3.34) the derivative operators coming from the metric determinant, the vertices, the polarizations, and the exchange propagator act on the product of the delta function and 1/(Π^2 + α m_Φ^2). Equation (3.35) then defines A(0) by setting V_{34}^{γδ}(0,0,0) and gBB(0,0,∂α), thereby discarding all p_2, σ_3, σ_4, and q-dependent terms, with the statement that derivative-of-delta terms are recovered through the conformal Ward identity for M_{μ,d+1}. This recovery was demonstrated in [17] for massive scalars, but for massive vectors the Ward-identity derivatives act not only on the momenta in the delta function but also on the polarization vectors ǫ_i and on the tensor structures G^{μν}(P_i) = η^{μν} - P_i^μ P_i^ν/M^2. Those derivatives generate new terms that need not match the discarded p_2, σ_3, σ_4, and q-dependent pieces. Moreover, the split between A(0) and derivative-of-delta terms depends on which bulk vertex is integrated first; no proof of vertex-ordering independence is given. Until the full D({P_i}) is computed to order 1/R^2 and shown to satisfy the Ward identity with the proposed A(0), or until A(0) is shown to be independent of the ordering, the subleading terms in Eq. (3.36) are not established.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.28)] The subleading bulk-to-bulk propagator is obtained by assuming that G_{BB(2)}^{νβ} is a linear combination of the five two-index tensors X^νX^β, P̃^νP̃^β, X^νP̃^β, X^βP̃^ν, η^{νβ}, with scalar coefficients C,D,E,F plus the explicit (X·X/2) term. No completeness or uniqueness argument is supplied for this ansatz. Equation (2.27) is an inhomogeneous second-order partial differential equation; after factoring the plane wave it still admits homogeneous solutions, and it is not shown that the selected coefficient functions (2.29)-(2.31) are the unique particular solution relevant to the propagator. Since G_{BB(2)} feeds directly into the amplitude through Eq. (3.33), the 1/R^2 part of Eq. (3.36) inherits this gap. A similar completeness concern applies to the H^{νβ} ansatz in Eq. (2.21); while that equation is simpler, the paper does not argue that the solution space is exhausted by the chosen tensor basis.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (3.36)] The final amplitude as written is missing the overall coupling factor in the second line. The text before Eq. (3.18) says g'^2 φ_0 is set to 1 for simplicity, but Eq. (3.36) restores an overall (g'^2 φ_0)^2 in the first line. The second line, which contains the term proportional to (ǫ_3·ǫ_4)(ǫ_1·P_2)(ǫ_2·P_1), lacks this factor. Since every term in the exchange diagram should carry the same two powers of the cubic coupling, this appears to be a typo rather than a physical effect, but it should be corrected because Eq. (3.36) is the central result of the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eqs. (2.9)-(2.11)] The notation ̃Π is used for the Fourier-transformed propagator in Eq. (2.9), but Eq. (2.10) uses both ̃Π and Π without defining the difference, and Eq. (2.11) writes ̃Π but calls it ˜Π. The notation should be made uniform.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (3.35)] The displayed definition of A_{αβγδ}^{(0)} is visually confusing: the delta function is placed inside the braces in the first line, but the text then says that it is factored out to simplify the derivative terms. The equation would be clearer if the delta function were explicitly separated before the derivative operators are applied.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (4.3)] The quantity f^{νβ}_1 in Eq. (4.3) is not defined before it is used; it appears to denote the leading flat-space structure G^{νβ}(P̂) but this should be stated explicitly, especially because the double-scaling limit is one of the new results claimed in the paper.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (3.28)] The derivation that the 1/R^2 polarization correction does not contribute is compact: the vertex is replaced by its flat-space R→∞ form, and then P_{1α}G^{μα}(P_1)=0 is used. This is correct for the leading vertex, but the sentence 'we used the property P_{1α}G^{μα}(P_1)=0' should also mention that all subleading vertex terms are multiplied by an extra 1/R^2 and therefore do not interfere at the order considered, which is implicit but not stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the propagators and exchange amplitude are derived from equations of motion; reliance on [17] is external and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The bulk-to-boundary propagator in Eq. (2.22) and the bulk-to-bulk propagator in Eqs. (2.28)-(2.31) are obtained by solving the Proca and sourced Proca equations of motion in a 1/R expansion, as shown in Eqs. (2.14), (2.20), (2.24), (2.27) and Appendix A, rather than by assuming the final amplitude. The polarization correction in Eq. (3.6) is likewise solved from the transversality condition in Eqs. (3.2)-(3.4) with an explicit choice c2=0 and c1=1. The central amplitude in Eqs. (3.34)-(3.36) is a direct evaluation of the momentum-conserving-delta-function coefficient defined in Eq. (3.11); the leading term reproduces the flat-space scalar-exchange amplitude as a consistency check, and the 1/R^2 terms follow from the previously derived propagators, vertices, and scalar bulk-to-bulk propagator. No parameter is fitted to any target amplitude, and no load-bearing step is justified by a same-author citation: the construction is borrowed from [17] (Gadde and Sharma), which is external to the present author set, while the authors' own prior works [29]-[32] appear only as motivation and future outlook. The main caveat is that the paper assumes, following [17], that terms involving derivatives of the momentum-conserving delta function are recovered from the M_{mu,d+1} conformal Ward identity (see the discussion after Eq. (3.11) and after Eq. (3.35)); this recovery is not explicitly demonstrated for massive vector fields and is a completeness risk for reconstructing the full boundary correlator, but it is not circular because the computed A^(0) is obtained independently and the Ward-identity recovery is not used as an input in deriving Eq. (3.36). The identification of the S-matrix with the delta-function coefficient is a definitional convention, not a fitted or self-referential inference. Therefore no circular step is present, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation does not fit any constants to data; the masses are inputs from the Abelian Higgs Lagrangian. The main burden is conceptual: the definition of the AdS S-matrix as a delta-function coefficient, the large-Delta correspondence, and the completeness of ansaetze for the subleading propagator corrections. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Polarization gauge coefficients c1, c2 = c1=1, c2=0
    In Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6) the subleading polarization correction is chosen by hand to remove (P.X) dependence with n>=1; the authors state this choice does not affect the leading A(0) amplitude, so it is not a fitted constant but is an arbitrary gauge choice.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The AdS S-matrix is the coefficient of delta(sum P_i) in the 1/R-expanded Witten diagram, and the full boundary correlator can be recovered from it through the conformal Ward identity for M_{mu,d+1}.
    This is the defining premise of the formalism, imported from [17] and used in Eq. (3.35) to discard derivative-of-delta terms.
  • domain assumption A massive bulk scalar or vector of fixed mass M has a large conformal dimension Delta approximately MR in the R to infinity limit.
    Used in Eq. (2.16) and Eq. (4.1) to justify the plane-wave ansatz and the 1/R expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper The ansatz for H^{nu beta} and G_{BB(2)} as linear combinations of a fixed set of two-index tensors spans the space of solutions to the subleading equations.
    Used in Appendix A and Eq. (2.28); no uniqueness or completeness proof is given.
  • standard math The saddle-point approximation for the boundary Fourier transform gives the leading plane-wave external state.
    Used in Eqs. (2.11)-(2.12) to connect embedding-space propagators to momentum-space plane waves.
  • domain assumption The negative-energy solution of the propagator equation can be discarded on physical grounds.
    Stated after Eq. (2.16); this selects one of two possible on-shell branches.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AdS S-Matrix for Massive Vector Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DAU6FYLS

@misc{pith2026241219253,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AdS S-Matrix for Massive Vector Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DAU6FYLS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19253}
}
read the original abstract

We generalize a recent ``AdS S-matrix" formulation for interacting massive scalars on AdS spacetimes to the case of massive vector fields. This method relies on taking the infinite radius limit for scattering processes perturbatively, which is analyzed using Witten diagrams in the momentum space formulation of global AdS with embedding space coordinates. It recovers the S-matrix with subleading corrections in powers of the inverse AdS radius about a flat spacetime region within the bulk. We first derive the massive vector bulk-to-boundary and bulk-to-bulk propagators within this perturbation theory. As an example, we consider the Abelian Higgs Model in a certain regime of the coupling parameter space to model an interacting Proca theory on AdS spacetimes. We specifically compute the AdS S-matrix for a process involving massive external vector fields mediated by a massive scalar. We lastly discuss possible massless limit of propagators within this perturbative framework.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Li\'enard--Wiechert fields in AdS and flat-space antipodal matching from geodesic-centered Coulombic data

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    The Coulombic Liénard–Wiechert field in AdS and flat space is obtained by recentering the static Coulomb seed on the source geodesic, and antipodal matching emerges as the flat-space limit of an exact bulk antipodal c...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    Gadde and T

    A. Gadde and T. Sharma, A scattering amplitude for massive particles in AdS , JHEP 09 (2022) 157 [2204.06462]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and superg ravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  3. [2]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Penedones, TASI lectures on AdS/CFT , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and St rings, pp

    J. Penedones, TASI lectures on AdS/CFT , in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and St rings, pp. 75–136, 2017, 1608.04948, DOI

    arXiv 2017

  6. [5]

    Polchinski, S matrices from AdS space-time , hep-th/9901076

    J. Polchinski, S matrices from AdS space-time , hep-th/9901076

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    S. B. Giddings, Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT corre spondence, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 106008 [hep-th/9907129]

    arXiv 2000

  8. [7]

    Gary and S

    M. Gary and S. B. Giddings, The Flat space S-matrix from the AdS/CFT correspondence? , Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 046008 [0904.3544]

    arXiv 2009

Show all 69 references
  1. [8]

    Penedones, Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplit udes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]

    J. Penedones, Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplit udes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, J. Penedones, S. Raju and B. C. va n Rees, A Natural Language for AdS/CFT Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 095 [1107.1499]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [10]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, Analyticity and the Holographic S-Matrix , JHEP 10 (2012) 127 [1111.6972]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [11]

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, Scattering States in AdS/CFT , 1104.2597

    arXiv

  5. [12]

    Raju, New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Co rrelators, Phys

    S. Raju, New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Co rrelators, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 126009 [1201.6449]

    2012 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Hijano, Flat space physics from AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2019) 132 [1905.02729]

    E. Hijano, Flat space physics from AdS/CFT , JHEP 07 (2019) 132 [1905.02729]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Hijano and D

    E. Hijano and D. Neuenfeld, Soft photon theorems from CFT Ward identites in the flat limit of AdS/CFT , JHEP 11 (2020) 009 [2005.03667]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Komatsu, M

    S. Komatsu, M. F. Paulos, B. C. Van Rees and X. Zhao, Landau diagrams in AdS and S-matrices from conformal correlators , JHEP 11 (2020) 046 [2007.13745]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Li, Notes on flat-space limit of AdS/CFT , JHEP 09 (2021) 027 [2106.04606]

    Y.-Z. Li, Notes on flat-space limit of AdS/CFT , JHEP 09 (2021) 027 [2106.04606]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Marotta, K

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis and M. Verma, Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT , JHEP 08 (2024) 226 [2406.06447]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chowdhury, A

    C. Chowdhury, A. Lipstein, J. Mei and Y. Mo, Soft limits of gluon and graviton correlators in Anti-de Sitter space , JHEP 10 (2024) 070 [2407.16052]. 32

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Ba˜ nados, E

    M. Ba˜ nados, E. Bianchi, I. Mu˜ noz and K. Skenderis, AdS amplitudes as CFT correlators , 2412.09503

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Okuda and J

    T. Okuda and J. Penedones, String scattering in flat space and a scaling limit of Yang-Mi lls correlators, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 086001 [1002.2641]

    2011 arXiv

  14. [22]

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees and P. Vie ira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS , JHEP 11 (2017) 133 [1607.06109]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Poland, S

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov and A. Vichi, The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 015002

    2019

  16. [24]

    Poland and D

    D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The conformal bootstrap , Nature Phys. 12 (2016) 535

    2016

  17. [25]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. Polyakov and A. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory , Nuclear Physics B 241 (1984) 333

    1984

  18. [26]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Zhiboedov, Looking for a bulk point , JHEP 01 (2017) 013 [1509.03612]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Hamilton, D

    A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141]

    2006 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons , Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516

    1965

  21. [29]

    Banerjee, A

    N. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharjee and A. Mitra, Classical Soft Theorem in the AdS-Schwarzschild spacetime in small cosmological consta nt limit , JHEP 01 (2021) 038 [2008.02828]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Banerjee, K

    N. Banerjee, K. Fernandes and A. Mitra, Soft photon theorem in the small negative cosmological constant limit , JHEP 08 (2021) 105 [2102.06165]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Banerjee, K

    N. Banerjee, K. Fernandes and A. Mitra, 1/L2 corrected soft photon theorem from a CFT 3 Ward identity , JHEP 04 (2023) 055 [2209.06802]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Fernandes, N

    K. Fernandes, N. Banerjee and A. Mitra, Soft factors with AdS radius corrections , JHAP 3 (2023) 5 [2310.19299]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Duary, E

    S. Duary, E. Hijano and M. Patra, Towards an IR finite S-matrix in the flat limit of AdS/CFT, 2211.13711

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Duary, AdS correction to the Faddeev-Kulish state: migrating from the flat peninsula , JHEP 05 (2023) 079 [2212.09509]

    S. Duary, AdS correction to the Faddeev-Kulish state: migrating from the flat peninsula , JHEP 05 (2023) 079 [2212.09509]

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Sahoo, Classical Sub-subleading Soft Photon and Soft Graviton The orems in Four Spacetime Dimensions, JHEP 12 (2020) 070 [2008.04376]

    B. Sahoo, Classical Sub-subleading Soft Photon and Soft Graviton The orems in Four Spacetime Dimensions, JHEP 12 (2020) 070 [2008.04376]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A. P. Saha, B. Sahoo and A. Sen, Proof of the classical soft graviton theorem in D = 4 , JHEP 06 (2020) 153 [1912.06413]

    2020 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: Derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass , Phys

    S. Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in s-matrix theory: Derivation of charge conservation and equality of gravitational and inertial mass , Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B1049

    1964

  30. [38]

    D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw, Low-energy theorem for graviton scattering , Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1287 . 33

    1968

  31. [39]

    Jackiw, Low-energy theorems for massless bosons: Photons and gravi tons, Phys

    R. Jackiw, Low-energy theorems for massless bosons: Photons and gravi tons, Phys. Rev. 168 (1968) 1623

    1968

  32. [40]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger, BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem, JHEP 05 (2015) 151 [1401.7026]

    2015 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies, P. Di Vecchia and J. Nohle, Low-Energy Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons from Gauge Invariance , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 084035 [1406.6987]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, Asymptotic symmetries and subleading soft graviton theore m, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124028 [1408.2228]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Sub-subleading Soft Graviton Theorem in Generic Theories o f Quantum Gravity , JHEP 10 (2017) 065 [1706.00759]

    2017 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Klose, T

    T. Klose, T. McLoughlin, D. Nandan, J. Plefka and G. Travaglini, Double-Soft Limits of Gluons and Gravitons , JHEP 07 (2015) 135 [1504.05558]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cachazo and A

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem , 1404.4091

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Casali, Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes , JHEP 08 (2014) 077 [1404.5551]

    E. Casali, Soft sub-leading divergences in Yang-Mills amplitudes , JHEP 08 (2014) 077 [1404.5551]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Banerjee, T

    N. Banerjee, T. Rahnuma and R. K. Singh, Soft and collinear limits in N = 8 supergravity using double copy formalism , JHEP 04 (2023) 126 [2212.11480]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    He and P

    T. He and P. Mitra, Asymptotic symmetries and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem i n Mink d+2, JHEP 10 (2019) 213 [1903.02608]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theo ry, 1703.05448

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theo ry, 1703.05448

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152 [1312.2229]

    A. Strominger, On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering , JHEP 07 (2014) 152 [1312.2229]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, Loop Corrected Soft Photon Theorem as a Ward Identity , JHEP 10 (2019) 287 [1903.09133]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Banerjee, T

    N. Banerjee, T. Rahnuma and R. K. Singh, Asymptotic Symmetry of Four Dimensional Einstein-Yang-Mills and Einstein-Maxwell Theory , 2110.15657

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Banerjee, T

    N. Banerjee, T. Rahnuma and R. K. Singh, Asymptotic Symmetry algebra of N = 8 Supergravity, 2212.12133

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Comp` ere, A

    G. Comp` ere, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ -BMS4 group of dS 4 and new boundary conditions for AdS 4, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 195017 [1905.00971]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Comp` ere, A

    G. Comp` ere, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ -BMS4 charge algebra, JHEP 10 (2020) 205 [2004.10769]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kabat, G

    D. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, S. Roy and D. Sarkar, Holographic representation of bulk fields with spin in AdS/CFT , Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 026004 [1204.0126]

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves and J. a. Penedones, Spinning AdS Propagators , JHEP 09 (2014) 064 [1404.5625]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Theory of the radiation of photons of small arbitrary mass , Helv. Phys. Acta 30 (1957) 209. 34

    1957

  51. [59]

    Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity , Rev

    K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity , Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [1105.3735]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Allen and T

    B. Allen and T. Jacobson, Vector Two Point Functions in Maximally Symmetric Spaces , Commun. Math. Phys. 103 (1986) 669

    1986

  53. [61]

    Naqvi, Propagators for massive symmetric tensor and p forms in AdS( d+1), JHEP 12 (1999) 025 [hep-th/9911182]

    A. Naqvi, Propagators for massive symmetric tensor and p forms in AdS( d+1), JHEP 12 (1999) 025 [hep-th/9911182]

    1999 arXiv

  54. [62]

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland and S. Rychkov, Spinning Conformal Correlators , JHEP 11 (2011) 071 [1107.3554]

    2011 arXiv

  55. [63]

    M. H. Dehghani, A. M. Ghezelbash and R. B. Mann, Abelian Higgs hair for AdS - Schwarzschild black hole , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044010 [hep-th/0107224]

    2002 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. S. Gubser, Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 065034 [0801.2977]

    2008 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Kapec, Y

    D. Kapec, Y. T. A. Law and S. A. Narayanan, Soft scalars and the geometry of the space of celestial conformal field theories , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 046024 [2205.10935]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Gravity Waves from Soft Theorem in General Dimensions , JHEP 09 (2018) 105 [1801.07719]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Expansion in Four Dimensions , JHEP 10 (2018) 056 [1804.09193]

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen, Classical proof of the classical soft graviton theorem in D >4, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 084011 [1906.08288]

    2020 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Fernandes and A

    K. Fernandes and A. Mitra, Soft factors from classical scattering on the Reissner-Nor dstr¨ om spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 105015 [2005.03613]. 35

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.