Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 5 cited by

Primordial Black Hole Formation from the Upward Step Model: Avoiding Overproduction

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An upward step in the inflaton potential can remove almost all type-I primordial black holes once the non-Gaussian cutoff is included, while leaving the gravitational-wave signal intact.

desk verdict Plausible mechanism, but the PTA-resolution example rests on an asserted hard-cutoff equivalence that isn't derived; the quantitative EPS calculation itself is a useful contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19631 v2 pith:QDFRLSVZ submitted 2024-12-27 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Xiaoding Wang , Xiao-Han Ma , Yi-Fu Cai This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords primordialblackholesupwardstepinflationnon-Gaussiantailscompactionfunctionextendedmass-functionformalismscalar-inducedgravitationalwavespulsartimingarraysPBHoverproduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the upward-step inflationary model, previously thought to overproduce primordial black holes (PBHs) and therefore disfavored by pulsar timing array observations, actually avoids overproduction once the non-Gaussian tail of the curvature perturbation is treated non-perturbatively. The key is a pointwise nonlinear relation between the curvature perturbation and a Gaussian field that imposes a hard cutoff on the curvature perturbation. Using an extended mass-function formalism, the authors find that as the relaxation parameter grows past about 5.9, the type-I PBH fraction drops by a factor of about $10^{133}$ before rising again. This happens because the cutoff deletes the first type-I peak of the compaction function, forcing the collapse radius to jump to a larger peak. A sympathetic reader would care because it shows that a positive $f_{\rm NL}$ need not increase PBH abundance, and that non-Gaussian tails can salvage models that the pulsar timing array data seemed to exclude.

What carries the argument

The central object is the nonlinear map $\mathcal{R}=F(\mathcal{R}_G)=-\frac{2}{h}\bigl(\sqrt{1-h\mathcal{R}_G}-1\bigr)$, where $\mathcal{R}_G$ is the Gaussian part of the curvature perturbation and $h$ measures how far the post-step field velocity is from the slow-roll attractor. The map saturates at $\mathcal{R}=2/h$, producing a hard cutoff in the probability distribution of $\mathcal{R}$. All abundance estimates flow through this map: it reshapes the real-space profile $\mathcal{R}(r)$, moves the location $r_m$ of the first type-I compaction peak (discontinuously, when the cutoff removes it), changes the threshold $C_{\mathrm{th}}$, and bends the integration path in the two-dimensional Gaussian probability space of $(X,Y)=(r\mathcal{R}'_G,\mathcal{R}_G)$ when computing the probability $P(C_\ell)$ of the linear compaction function. The extended mass-function formalism converts that probability into the PBH mass fraction $f_{\mathrm{PBH}}$.

What would settle it

Take the finite-width upward step of the paper, generate the real-space curvature profiles directly from the smoothed step without imposing the hard-cutoff map, compute the compaction function $C(r)$ and its first type-I peak, and run the extended mass-function integral for $h$ in the claimed equivalent range; if the first peak survives or $r_m$ does not jump discontinuously, the $10^{133}$ suppression and the claimed resolution of overproduction fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the upward-step model, the curvature perturbation is not a Gaussian field: the delta-N relation gives $\mathcal{R}=-(2/h)(\sqrt{1-h\mathcal{R}_G}-1)$, which saturates at $\mathcal{R}=2/h$ and therefore has a hard cutoff in its probability distribution. The paper shows that this cutoff changes PBH formation in two ways: it reshapes the real-space curvature profile and the associated compaction function $C(r)$, and it bends the integration path in the two-dimensional Gaussian probability space used to compute the probability distribution of the linear compaction function $C_\ell$. With a broken power-law spectrum fitted to the model, the type-I PBH fraction $f_{\mathrm{PBH}}$ first grows with $h$, then drops by a factor of about $10^{133}$ near $h\simeq 5.9$, and then rises again; the drop occurs because the cutoff eliminates the first type-I peak of $C(r)$, forcing $r_m$ to jump to a larger-radius peak. The authors conclude that, once this non-perturbative effect is included, upward-step models can produce the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background observed by pulsar timing arrays without overproducing PBHs, even though $f_{\rm NL}>0$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole suppression rests on the assumption that real-space fluctuations obey the pointwise local map with a hard cutoff that removes the first type-I peak of the compaction function; for a realistic finite-width step the paper substitutes an exponential tail and an asserted 'equivalent' range $7.97<h<10.25$ without deriving the mass-function calculation for that tail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $h>5.9$ with the broken power-law spectrum used in the paper, the type-I PBH fraction collapses by roughly $10^{133}$, so the model can sit below current PBH constraints while still generating a sizeable scalar-induced gravitational-wave background.
  • A positive $f_{\rm NL}$ no longer guarantees enhanced PBH production; the sign of the effect is controlled by the location of the cutoff relative to the threshold.
  • PBH abundance becomes a function of the full non-Gaussian distribution, not just the curvature power spectrum, so indirect probes such as gravitational waves and CMB $\mu$-distortions cannot be translated into PBH constraints without specifying the tail.
  • In the large-$h$ regime the type-I channel is shut off, so type-II fluctuations (regions where the areal radius is non-monotonic) become the relevant formation channel and must be computed.
  • Within the model, matching the pulsar timing array band requires fine-tuned parameters, so the resolution of overproduction comes with a tuning cost rather than a generic prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abrupt $10^{133}$ drop suggests the type-I mass function is effectively truncated across the critical $h$; if type-II PBHs form instead, their masses may exceed the Hubble patch and leave a distinct signature in the PBH mass function that could be searched for in microlensing or gravitational-wave merger-rate data.
  • The paper's 'equivalent' range $7.97<h<10.25$ for the finite-width step is asserted, not derived; a direct numerical evaluation of the compaction profiles with the smoothed step would test whether the exponential tail behaves like the hard cutoff in the relevant probability integral.
  • The resolution of pulsar timing array overproduction is conditional on the assumption that the entire pulsar-timing signal is scalar-induced gravitational waves; if the signal is partly astrophysical, the required $h$ and the fine-tuning change, which is testable once the astrophysical background is better constrained.
  • The profile parametrization via the corrected two-point function rather than $F[\langle \mathcal{R}_G\mathcal{R}_G\rangle]$ is a modeling choice; the paper asserts the conclusions are unaffected, but varying the peak profile would provide a direct robustness check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies primordial black hole (PBH) formation in a single-field inflationary model with an upward step in the inflaton potential. Using the δN formalism, it derives a nonlinear relation (2.23) between the curvature perturbation R and a Gaussian field R_G, which gives a positive local f_NL=5h/12 and imposes a hard cutoff at R=2/h. The authors feed this relation into an extended Press-Schechter calculation based on the compaction function, using a broken-power-law fit to the numerically computed power spectrum, and compute the type-I PBH abundance as a function of h at fixed power spectrum. They find that f_PBH is enhanced for h≲5.9 and suppressed by a huge factor for h≳5.9, because the cutoff removes the first type-I peak in C(r) and forces r_m to jump outward. They then compute the accompanying scalar-induced gravitational wave spectrum and argue that, including non-perturbative non-Gaussianity, the upward-step model can fit the NANOGrav 15-year signal without overproducing PBHs. For the realistic finite-width step, which has h≈4.05 and an exponential tail rather than a hard cutoff, they assert an "equivalent" hard cutoff in the range 7.97<h<10.25.

Significance. If the mechanism works, the paper is significant: it provides a concrete example in which a positive f_NL suppresses rather than enhances PBH production, and it shows how non-perturbative tails modify both the compaction profile and the probability-space integration path in the extended Press-Schechter method. This would remove a well-known tension between PTA-induced gravitational wave interpretations and PBH overproduction, and it offers a useful template for treating non-Gaussian tails beyond polynomial expansions. The paper's strengths include an explicit derivation of the nonlinear relation from the δN formalism, a numerical computation of the power spectrum with a broken-power-law fit, and an implementation of the compaction-function threshold in the extended PS framework. The weaknesses are that the key quantitative claims—the sharp suppression, the equivalence of the finite-width tail to a hard cutoff, and the absence of a compensating type-II contribution—are either asserted without derivation or deferred to future work, so the central conclusion is not yet fully established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2, Fig. 7] The central PTA-resolution claim rests on the assertion that the finite-width step, whose PDF has an exponential tail P[R]∝exp(-2ω_s2 R) with ω_s2≃15.13, is "equivalent" to a hard cutoff with 10.25>h>7.97. This equivalence is not derived. The suppression in Fig. 4 for h>5.9 arises from the deterministic hard cutoff in (2.23), which removes the first type-I peak in C(r) and discontinuously shifts r_m; the extended PS probability integral (3.13) is built on the Jacobian J(Y)=F'(R_G) of that deterministic map. An exponential tail does not remove the first peak and requires a different treatment of P(C_ℓ); no calculation is shown for the tail case. Because the actual finite-width model has h=4.049 (Fig. 2), which lies in the enhancement region h<5.9 of Fig. 4, the claimed resolution of PTA overproduction stands or falls on this equivalence. Please provide a derivation of the equivalent-h map, or repeat the PBH calculation directly with the exponential-tail PDF.
  2. [§3.2, Fig. 4] Figure 4 scans h while keeping P_RG(k) fixed, but h is not an independent parameter of the model. From (2.13), h=6√2 ε_II/Π_d, while the peak amplitude of P_RG in (2.14) is proportional to (H/2π)^2/(2g^2 ε_II). Changing h by varying ΔV changes g=Π_d/Π_c, hence changes the power spectrum. The paper does not state what compensating changes in V0, ε_II, or H are made to hold P_RG fixed, nor whether such changes are compatible with the slow-roll-step-slow-roll setup. If the scan is not realizable, the critical value h≃5.9 and the 10^133 suppression are properties of the assumed fixed spectrum, not of the upward-step model, and the comparison with PTA data in Fig. 8 is not a model prediction.
  3. [§3.2, Fig. 4 and §5] The final abundance calculation excludes type-II fluctuations, yet the paper concludes that overproduction is resolved. The text explicitly states that for h>5.9 "a more precise calculation for the type-II channel is likely necessary," and §5 defers type-II studies to future work. The only quantitative estimate offered, eq. (3.20), is the probability P(R_G>1/h)∼10^-54 for the inflaton to be trapped at the bottom of the step; this is not the type-II PBH abundance, which involves non-monotonic areal radii and a different mass function. Therefore the drop in the type-I channel alone does not establish that the total f_PBH is small enough to avoid overproduction. The overproduction claim should be qualified or supplemented with an estimate or upper bound on the type-II contribution.
  4. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.6)-(3.13)] The statistical input for the non-Gaussian profile is ambiguous. Equations (3.4)-(3.6) prescribe that the real-space profile of R be obtained from a corrected power spectrum P_R, while the probability calculation in (3.9)-(3.13) defines X,Y as Gaussian variables with covariance built from P_RG. If R=F(R_G) pointwise, the peak profile of R_G is controlled by P_RG, and the two-point function of R is not the appropriate input for peak theory; if instead P_R is the correct profile input, then X,Y in (3.7) are not the Gaussian variables of (3.9). The paper should specify which field's peaks are being selected and justify that the C(r) profiles in Fig. 5 and the P(X,Y) used in Fig. 6 are mutually consistent.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] The text contains a typo: "curvature perturbvationR" should be "curvature perturbation R." The Section 3.1 heading "Press-Shecheter" should also be "Press-Schechter."
  2. [Fig. 4] The vertical axis of Fig. 4 extends to f_PBH∼10^7, but f_PBH is defined as a fraction of dark matter in (3.16)-(3.17); values above unity are unphysical and should be capped or clearly labeled as a logarithmic overproduction indicator.
  3. [Eq. (3.20)] Equation (3.20) uses σ_RG^2=Σ_YY, but the text surrounding Fig. 7 notes that Σ_YY changes when r_m jumps discontinuously; please state which value of r_m is used in the numerical estimate.
  4. [Fig. 8] The caption refers to the NANOGrav 15-year data and a 2σ confidence interval, but the plot shows only a shaded region; please indicate the data/band used or provide a reference for the plotted region.
  5. [Throughout] The symbol R is used both for the random field and for the radial profile R(r); distinguishing these notationally in the discussion around (3.1)-(3.5) would improve readability.
  6. [Abstract] The abstract states that the PTA overproduction problem is resolved, while §3.2 and §5 note that type-II fluctuations require future work; the abstract should carry the same caveat or the type-II contribution should be addressed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the PBH abundance is computed from an in-paper nonlinear map and external thresholds, not from a parameter fitted to PBH abundance or PTA data.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The nonlinear relation R = F(R_G) in Eq. (2.23) is derived in the paper from the δN formalism in Eqs. (2.19)-(2.22), rather than imported as a black box; the agreement with the authors' earlier papers [48,70] is corroboration, not load-bearing support. The extended Press-Schechter calculation in Section 3.1 takes the Gaussian power spectrum P_RG as input, which is obtained by numerically solving the Sasaki-Mukhanov equation (3.18) and fitting the broken power law (3.19) to that spectrum, not to the PBH abundance. The collapse threshold is taken from external numerical-relativity literature [83,91], and the PTA comparison uses external observational data. Thus no parameter is fitted to f_PBH itself, and the claimed h-dependent suppression is a computed consequence of the assumed map (2.23) and the EPS integrals (3.13)-(3.17). The one genuinely underived step is the assertion, in Section 3.2 and Figure 7, that the finite-width step's exponential tail P[R] ∝ exp(-2ω_s2 R) is 'equivalent' to a hard-cutoff model with 10.25 > h > 7.97; the paper does not show the calculation establishing this equivalence. This is a support gap and a correctness risk for the PTA-resolution claim, but it is not circularity: the equivalence is not shown to be defined by the abundance value it is used to predict, and the hard-cutoff abundance curve in Figure 4 is computed independently from Eq. (2.23). The paper also explicitly acknowledges high sensitivity to step shape, which further confirms that the conclusions are model-dependent rather than tautological. Overall, no equation or fitted parameter reduces by construction to the claimed prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All parameters and assumptions are model inputs; the central suppression mechanism is the nonlinear mapping (2.23), which is assumed rather than independently tested. The finite-width equivalence is an ad hoc bridge between the idealized sharp-step calculation and the realistic model, and it carries much of the weight of the PTA consistency claim.

free parameters (4)
  • Potential parameters (V0, DeltaV, epsilon_I, epsilon_II, lambda) = V0=7e-10 M_pl^4, DeltaV=3.85805e-13 M_pl^4, epsilon_I=2.551e-3, epsilon_II=4.077e-7, lambda=1.5e2
    Chosen to realize the upward step and the enhanced power spectrum; the abundance result depends on them, but they are model inputs rather than fits to PBH data.
  • h (and g) = h scanned from 0 to about 14; critical h about 5.9; model h=4.049 sharp, equivalent 7.97<h<10.25 finite width
    h characterizes relaxation after the step and controls the cutoff in (2.23); the central f_PBH(h) curve is computed by scanning h at fixed P_RG, so h acts as a free parameter in the main result.
  • Broken power-law fit parameters = A=0.104, alpha=4, gamma=3, beta=7, k*=1.04e8 Mpc^-1
    These BPL parameters are fitted to the numerical power spectrum in Figure 2 and drive the PBH abundance and SIGW calculations.
  • Finite-width tail index omega_s2 = omega_s2 approximately 15.13
    Determined by the step width and used to claim the finite-width exponential tail is equivalent to the hard-cutoff h range 7.97<h<10.25.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The velocity after the upward step satisfies the nonlinear relation (2.7), leading to the pointwise mapping (2.23) with a hard cutoff in R.
    Used throughout Section 3 to define the compaction profile, cutoff, and PDF. Assumes a canonical kinetic term, constant H through the step, and negligible quantum diffusion.
  • domain assumption The universal threshold C_th = 2/5 from numerical relativity applies to the averaged compaction function.
    Adopted in Section 3.1 from [83] as the collapse criterion for type-I perturbations.
  • domain assumption Real-space Gaussian profiles are described by peak theory, R_G(r) = mu psi_0(r), with the top-hat window function.
    Section 3.1, equations (3.4)-(3.5); assumes high peaks and that two-point statistics determine the profile.
  • domain assumption PBH abundance follows the extended Press-Schechter mass formula (3.14) with critical-collapse scaling.
    Standard formalism adopted from [90]; used to convert P(C_l) into f_PBH.
  • ad hoc to paper The finite-width step can be represented by an equivalent hard-cutoff h in the range 7.97<h<10.25.
    Asserted in Section 3.2 after Figure 7 without derivation; this equivalence is load-bearing for applying the sharp-step suppression to the realistic model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Primordial Black Hole Formation from the Upward Step Model: Avoiding Overproduction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QDFRLSVZ

@misc{pith2026241219631,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Primordial Black Hole Formation from the Upward Step Model: Avoiding Overproduction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QDFRLSVZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19631}
}
abstract

We investigate the formation of primordial black holes (PBHs) in an upward step inflationary model, where nonlinearities between curvature perturbations and field fluctuations introduce a cutoff, deviating from the Gaussian case. This necessitates a reevaluation of PBH formation, as $\mathcal{R}$ is not the optimal variable for estimating abundance. Using the extended Press-Schechter formalism, we show that non-Gaussianity modifies both the curvature perturbation profile $\mathcal{R}(r)$ and the integration path in probability space, significantly impacting PBH abundance. Our results reveal that the abundance initially increases with the parameter $h$, which characterizes the relaxation stage after the step. However, beyond a critical value ($h \simeq 5.9$), it sharply declines before rising again. Furthermore, we demonstrate that non-Gaussianity introduces uncertainties in indirect PBH observations via gravitational waves. Notably, we present an example where a positive $f_{\rm NL}$ does not necessarily enhance PBH production, contrary to conventional expectations. Finally, by accounting for non-perturbative effects, we resolve the overproduction of PBHs suggested by pulsar timing array (PTA) data, underscoring the critical importance of incorporating non-Gaussianity in future studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superhorizon curvature perturbations in hybrid inflation revisited

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hybrid inflation's waterfall tachyonic instability grows isocurvature modes that convert to curvature perturbations at the field-space turn, yielding a k^{3}-peaked spectrum with always-positive f_NL that enhances PBH...

  2. Purely quadratic non-Gaussianity from tachyonic instability: Primordial black holes and scalar-induced gravitational waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Purely quadratic non-Gaussianity from tachyonic instability allows narrow curvature spectra to exponentially suppress primordial black hole overproduction via correlation coefficient ρ approaching -1 while retaining s...

  3. Evolution of Linear Perturbations under Time-Dependent Hubble Friction I: SR-USR-SR Inflation

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Analytic asymptotics show the dip in the SR-USR-SR curvature power spectrum comes from cancellation between two growing modes, not a constant-versus-growing cancellation.

  4. Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Holes formed by Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A transient null-energy-condition violation during inflation is shown to produce a four-component gravitational-wave background — primordial, scalar-induced, PBH ringdown, and binary-merger — with only the solar-mass ...

  5. Tensor induced gravitational waves

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Second-order tensor-induced gravitational waves can shift the inferred parameters of small-scale primordial gravitational wave models fitted to NANOGrav 15-year data, with one model favored by Bayes factors.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon

    S. Hawking,Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 152(1971) 75

    1971

  2. [2]

    Carr and S.W

    B.J. Carr and S.W. Hawking,Black holes in the early Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 168(1974) 399

    1974

  3. [3]

    Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys

    B.J. Carr,The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1

    1975

  4. [4]

    Khlopov,Primordial Black Holes,Res

    M.Y. Khlopov,Primordial Black Holes,Res. Astron. Astrophys.10(2010) 495 [0801.0116]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Belotsky, A.D

    K.M. Belotsky, A.D. Dmitriev, E.A. Esipova, V.A. Gani, A.V. Grobov, M.Y. Khlopov et al., Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter,Mod. Phys. Lett. A29(2014) 1440005 [1410.0203]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Carr and F

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel,Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 355 [2006.02838]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    A.D. Dolgov,Tension between HST/JWST andΛCDM Cosmology, PBH, and Antimatter in the Galaxy, in14th Frascati workshop on Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources, 10, 2023 [2310.00671]. [8]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 061102 [1602.03837]. [9]LIG...

    arXiv 2016

  8. [18]

    Reardon et al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys

    D.J. Reardon et al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L6 [2306.16215]

    arXiv 2023

Show all 102 references
  1. [19]

    Zic et al.,The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Third Data Release,2306.16230

    A. Zic et al.,The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Third Data Release,2306.16230

    arXiv

  2. [20]

    Reardon et al.,The Gravitational-wave Background Null Hypothesis: Characterizing Noise in Millisecond Pulsar Arrival Times with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys

    D.J. Reardon et al.,The Gravitational-wave Background Null Hypothesis: Characterizing Noise in Millisecond Pulsar Arrival Times with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L7 [2306.16229]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [21]

    Xu et al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Res

    H. Xu et al.,Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,Res. Astron. Astrophys.23(2023) 075024 [2306.16216]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [22]

    M. He, K. Kohri, K. Mukaida and M. Yamada,Formation of hot spots around small primordial black holes,JCAP01(2023) 027 [2210.06238]. [23]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [24]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. H¨ utsi, J. Raidal, J. Urrutia, V. Vaskonen et al.,Gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries in light of the NANOGrav 15-year data,Phys. Rev. D 109(2024) L021302 [2306.17021]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [25]

    Sato-Polito, M

    G. Sato-Polito, M. Zaldarriaga and E. Quataert,Where are the supermassive black holes measured by PTAs?,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 063020 [2312.06756]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [26]

    S.-R. Xiao, Y. Shao, L.-F. Wang, J.-Y. Song, L. Feng, J.-F. Zhang et al.,Nanohertz gravitational waves from a quasar-based supermassive black hole binary population model as dark sirens,2408.00609

    arXiv

  8. [27]

    Y. Chen, Q. Yu and Y. Lu,Constraining the Origin of the Nanohertz Gravitational-wave Background by Pulsar Timing Array Observations of Both the Background and Individual Supermassive Binary Black Holes,Astrophys. J.974(2024) 261 [2409.18029]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [28]

    Toubiana, L

    A. Toubiana, L. Sberna, M. Volonteri, E. Barausse, S. Babak, R. Enficiaud et al.,Reconciling PTA and JWST and preparing for LISA with POMPOCO: a Parametrisation Of the Massive black hole POpulation for Comparison to Observations,2410.17916. [29]NANOGravcollaboration,The NANOGr...

    2023 arXiv

  10. [30]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., V. Vaskonen and H. Veermae,Recent Gravitational Wave Observation by Pulsar Timing Arrays and Primordial Black Holes: The Importance of Non-Gaussianities,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 201401 [2306.17149]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [31]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Fairbairn, G. Franciolini, G. H¨ utsi, A. Iovino, M. Lewicki et al.,What is the source of the PTA GW signal?,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023522 [2308.08546]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [32]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo, T. Nakama and Y. Koga,Cosmological long-wavelength solutions and primordial black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 084057 [1503.03934]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [33]

    Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations,Phys

    I. Musco,Threshold for primordial black holes: Dependence on the shape of the cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 123524 [1809.02127]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [34]

    Young,Peaks and primordial black holes: the effect of non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 037 [2201.13345]

    S. Young,Peaks and primordial black holes: the effect of non-Gaussianity,JCAP05(2022) 037 [2201.13345]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [35]

    Harada, C.-M

    T. Harada, C.-M. Yoo and Y. Koga,Revisiting compaction functions for primordial black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043515 [2304.13284]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [36]

    Ferrante, G

    G. Ferrante, G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior. and A. Urbano,Primordial non-Gaussianity up to all orders: Theoretical aspects and implications for primordial black hole models,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043520 [2211.01728]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [37]

    A.D. Gow, H. Assadullahi, J.H.P. Jackson, K. Koyama, V. Vennin and D. Wands, Non-perturbative non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes,EPL142(2023) 49001 [2211.08348]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [38]

    R.-g. Cai, S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Gravitational Waves Induced by non-Gaussian Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 201101 [1810.11000]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [39]

    Ferrante, G

    G. Ferrante, G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior. and A. Urbano,Primordial black holes in the curvaton model: possible connections to pulsar timing arrays and dark matter,JCAP06 (2023) 057 [2305.13382]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [40]

    Liu, Z.-C

    L. Liu, Z.-C. Chen and Q.-G. Huang,Implications for the non-Gaussianity of curvature perturbation from pulsar timing arrays,2307.01102

    arXiv

  21. [41]

    Choudhury, K

    S. Choudhury, K. Dey, A. Karde, S. Panda and M. Sami,Primordial non-Gaussianity as a saviour for PBH overproduction in SIGWs generated by Pulsar Timing Arrays for Galileon inflation,2310.11034

    arXiv

  22. [42]

    Iovino, G

    A.J. Iovino, G. Perna, A. Riotto and H. Veerm¨ ae,Curbing PBHs with PTAs,JCAP10(2024) 050 [2406.20089]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [43]

    Choudhury, K

    S. Choudhury, K. Dey, S. Ganguly, A. Karde, S.K. Singh and P. Tiwari,Negative non-Gaussianity as a salvager for PBHs with PTAs in bounce,2409.18983

    arXiv

  24. [44]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and non-Gaussianity,JCAP03(2018) 016 [1801.09415]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [45]

    Panagopoulos and E

    G. Panagopoulos and E. Silverstein,Primordial Black Holes from non-Gaussian tails, 1906.02827

    1906 arXiv

  26. [46]

    Figueroa, S

    D.G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 101302 [2012.06551]

    2021

  27. [47]

    Achucarro, S

    A. Achucarro, S. Cespedes, A.-C. Davis and G.A. Palma,The hand-made tail: non-perturbative tails from multifield inflation,JHEP05(2022) 052 [2112.14712]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [48]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou,Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation,JCAP12(2022) 034 [2207.11910]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [49]

    L.-Y. Chen, H. Yu and P. Wu,Primordial non-Guassianity in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063537 [2210.05201]. – 19 –

    2022 arXiv

  30. [50]

    Pi and M

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki,Logarithmic Duality of the Curvature Perturbation,Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 011002 [2211.13932]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [51]

    Nakama and T

    T. Nakama and T. Suyama,Primordial black holes as a novel probe of primordial gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 121304 [1506.05228]

    2015 arXiv

  32. [52]

    Dandoy, V

    V. Dandoy, V. Domcke and F. Rompineve,Search for scalar induced gravitational waves in the international pulsar timing array data release 2 and NANOgrav 12.5 years datasets, SciPost Phys. Core6(2023) 060 [2302.07901]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [53]

    Inomata, K

    K. Inomata, K. Kohri and T. Terada,Detected stochastic gravitational waves and subsolar-mass primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063506 [2306.17834]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [54]

    Cai, X.-C

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-C. He, X.-H. Ma, S.-F. Yan and G.-W. Yuan,Limits on scalar-induced gravitational waves from the stochastic background by pulsar timing array observations,Sci. Bull.68(2023) 2929 [2306.17822]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [55]

    Wang, Z.-C

    S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao, J.-P. Li and Q.-H. Zhu,Implications of pulsar timing array data for scalar-induced gravitational waves and primordial black holes: Primordial non-Gaussianity fNL considered,Phys. Rev. Res.6(2024) L012060 [2307.00572]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [56]

    Lewicki, P

    M. Lewicki, P. Toczek and V. Vaskonen,Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Slow First-Order Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 221003 [2402.04158]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [57]

    Firouzjahi and A

    H. Firouzjahi and A. Riotto,Sign of non-Gaussianity and the primordial black holes abundance,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 123504 [2309.10536]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [58]

    L. Covi, J. Hamann, A. Melchiorri, A. Slosar and I. Sorbera,Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features have a Future!,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 083509 [astro-ph/0606452]

    2006 arXiv

  39. [59]

    Hamann, L

    J. Hamann, L. Covi, A. Melchiorri and A. Slosar,New Constraints on Oscillations in the Primordial Spectrum of Inflationary Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 023503 [astro-ph/0701380]

    2007 arXiv

  40. [60]

    Mortonson, C

    M.J. Mortonson, C. Dvorkin, H.V. Peiris and W. Hu,CMB polarization features from inflation versus reionization,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 103519 [0903.4920]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [61]

    Adshead, C

    P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E.A. Lim,Non-Gaussianity from Step Features in the Inflationary Potential,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023531 [1110.3050]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [62]

    Miranda and W

    V. Miranda and W. Hu,Inflationary Steps in the Planck Data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083529 [1312.0946]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [63]

    Miranda, W

    V. Miranda, W. Hu, C. He and H. Motohashi,Nonlinear Excitations in Inflationary Power Spectra,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 023504 [1510.07580]

    2016 arXiv

  44. [64]

    Mishra and V

    S.S. Mishra and V. Sahni,Primordial Black Holes from a tiny bump/dip in the Inflaton potential,JCAP04(2020) 007 [1911.00057]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [65]

    Kefala, G.P

    K. Kefala, G.P. Kodaxis, I.D. Stamou and N. Tetradis,Features of the inflaton potential and the power spectrum of cosmological perturbations,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 023506 [2010.12483]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [66]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu,Primordial black holes arise when the inflaton falls, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123553 [2104.03972]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [67]

    Dalianis, G.P

    I. Dalianis, G.P. Kodaxis, I.D. Stamou, N. Tetradis and A. Tsigkas-Kouvelis,Spectrum oscillations from features in the potential of single-field inflation,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 103510 [2106.02467]

    2021 arXiv

  48. [68]

    Wolfson,Analytic correlation of inflationary potential to power spectrum shape: limits of validity, and ‘no-go’ for small field model analytics,JCAP01(2022) 036 [2110.10557]

    I. Wolfson,Analytic correlation of inflationary potential to power spectrum shape: limits of validity, and ‘no-go’ for small field model analytics,JCAP01(2022) 036 [2110.10557]

    2022 arXiv

  49. [69]

    Inomata, E

    K. Inomata, E. McDonough and W. Hu,Amplification of primordial perturbations from the rise or fall of the inflaton,JCAP02(2022) 031 [2110.14641]. – 20 –

    2022 arXiv

  50. [70]

    Cai, X.-H

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang and Z. Zhou,One small step for an inflaton, one giant leap for inflation: A novel non-Gaussian tail and primordial black holes,Phys. Lett. B 834(2022) 137461 [2112.13836]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [71]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin,Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling,JCAP02(2023) 043 [2210.03812]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [72]

    Kawaguchi, T

    R. Kawaguchi, T. Fujita and M. Sasaki,Highly asymmetric probability distribution from a finite-width upward step during inflation,JCAP11(2023) 021 [2305.18140]

    2023 arXiv

  53. [73]

    Wang, X.-H

    X. Wang, X.-H. Ma and M. Sasaki,A complete analysis of inflation with piecewise quadratic potential,2412.16463

    arXiv

  54. [74]

    Y. Cai, M. Zhu and Y.-S. Piao,Primordial black holes from null energy condition violation during inflation,2305.10933

    arXiv

  55. [75]

    Pattison, V

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,JCAP10(2017) 046 [1707.00537]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [76]

    Animali and V

    C. Animali and V. Vennin,Clustering of primordial black holes from quantum diffusion during inflation,JCAP08(2024) 026 [2402.08642]

    2024 arXiv

  57. [77]

    Vennin and D

    V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum diffusion and large primordial perturbations from inflation,2402.12672

    arXiv

  58. [78]

    Germani and R.K

    C. Germani and R.K. Sheth,Nonlinear statistics of primordial black holes from Gaussian curvature perturbations,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063520 [1912.07072]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [79]

    Shibata and M

    M. Shibata and M. Sasaki,Black hole formation in the Friedmann universe: Formulation and computation in numerical relativity,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 084002 [gr-qc/9905064]

    1999 arXiv

  60. [80]

    Young, C.T

    S. Young, C.T. Byrnes and M. Sasaki,Calculating the mass fraction of primordial black holes, JCAP07(2014) 045 [1405.7023]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [81]

    De Luca and A

    V. De Luca and A. Riotto,A note on the abundance of primordial black holes: Use and misuse of the metric curvature perturbation,Phys. Lett. B828(2022) 137035 [2201.09008]

    2022 arXiv

  62. [82]

    Raatikainen, S

    S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen and E. Tomberg,Primordial black hole compaction function from stochastic fluctuations in ultra-slow-roll inflation,2312.12911

    arXiv

  63. [83]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani and R.K. Sheth,Universal threshold for primordial black hole formation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 044022 [1907.13311]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [84]

    Bardeen, J.R

    J.M. Bardeen, J.R. Bond, N. Kaiser and A.S. Szalay,The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,Astrophys. J.304(1986) 15

    1986

  65. [85]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, J. Garriga and K. Kohri,Primordial black hole abundance from random Gaussian curvature perturbations and a local density threshold,PTEP2018(2018) 123E01 [1805.03946]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [86]

    V. Atal, J. Garriga and A. Marcos-Caballero,Primordial black hole formation with non-Gaussian curvature perturbations,JCAP09(2019) 073 [1905.13202]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [87]

    Yoo, J.-O

    C.-M. Yoo, J.-O. Gong and S. Yokoyama,Abundance of primordial black holes with local non-Gaussianity in peak theory,JCAP09(2019) 033 [1906.06790]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [88]

    V. Atal, J. Cid, A. Escriv` a and J. Garriga,PBH in single field inflation: the effect of shape dispersion and non-Gaussianities,JCAP05(2020) 022 [1908.11357]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [89]

    C.-M. Yoo, T. Harada, S. Hirano and K. Kohri,Abundance of Primordial Black Holes in Peak Theory for an Arbitrary Power Spectrum,PTEP2021(2021) 013E02 [2008.02425]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [90]

    Kitajima, Y

    N. Kitajima, Y. Tada, S. Yokoyama and C.-M. Yoo,Primordial black holes in peak theory with a non-Gaussian tail,JCAP10(2021) 053 [2109.00791]. – 21 –

    2021 arXiv

  71. [91]

    Escriv` a, C

    A. Escriv` a, C. Germani and R.K. Sheth,Analytical thresholds for black hole formation in general cosmological backgrounds,JCAP01(2021) 030 [2007.05564]

    2021 arXiv

  72. [92]

    Young,Computing the abundance of primordial black holes,2405.13259

    S. Young,Computing the abundance of primordial black holes,2405.13259

    arXiv

  73. [93]

    Choudhury and M

    S. Choudhury and M. Sami,Large fluctuations and Primordial Black Holes,Phys. Rept.1103 (2025) 1 [2407.17006]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [94]

    Kohri, T

    K. Kohri, T. Terada and T.T. Yanagida,Induced Gravitational Waves probing Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter with Memory Burden,2409.06365

    arXiv

  75. [95]

    Choptuik,Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys

    M.W. Choptuik,Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 9

    1993

  76. [96]

    Evans and J.S

    C.R. Evans and J.S. Coleman,Observation of critical phenomena and selfsimilarity in the gravitational collapse of radiation fluid,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 1782 [gr-qc/9402041]

    1994 arXiv

  77. [97]

    Koike, T

    T. Koike, T. Hara and S. Adachi,Critical behavior in gravitational collapse of radiation fluid: A Renormalization group (linear perturbation) analysis,Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 5170 [gr-qc/9503007]

    1995 arXiv

  78. [98]

    Niemeyer and K

    J.C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik,Near-critical gravitational collapse and the initial mass function of primordial black holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5481 [astro-ph/9709072]

    1998 arXiv

  79. [99]

    Green and A.R

    A.M. Green and A.R. Liddle,Critical collapse and the primordial black hole initial mass function,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 063509 [astro-ph/9901268]

    1999 arXiv

  80. [100]

    Musco, J.C

    I. Musco, J.C. Miller and A.G. Polnarev,Primordial black hole formation in the radiative era: Investigation of the critical nature of the collapse,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 235001 [0811.1452]

    2009 arXiv

  81. [101]

    Musco and J.C

    I. Musco and J.C. Miller,Primordial black hole formation in the early universe: critical behaviour and self-similarity,Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 145009 [1201.2379]

    2013 arXiv

  82. [102]

    Escriv` a,Simulation of primordial black hole formation using pseudo-spectral methods, Phys

    A. Escriv` a,Simulation of primordial black hole formation using pseudo-spectral methods, Phys. Dark Univ.27(2020) 100466 [1907.13065]

    2020 arXiv

  83. [103]

    Inomata and T

    K. Inomata and T. Nakama,Gravitational waves induced by scalar perturbations as probes of the small-scale primordial spectrum,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 043511 [1812.00674]

    2019 arXiv

  84. [104]

    Saikawa and S

    K. Saikawa and S. Shirai,Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model,JCAP05(2018) 035 [1803.01038]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [105]

    Escriv` a, V

    A. Escriv` a, V. Atal and J. Garriga,Formation of trapped vacuum bubbles during inflation, and consequences for PBH scenarios,JCAP10(2023) 035 [2306.09990]

    2023

  86. [106]

    Shimada, A

    M. Shimada, A. Escriv´ a, D. Saito, K. Uehara and C.-M. Yoo,Primordial Black Hole Formation from Type II Fluctuations with Primordial Non-Gaussianity,2411.07648

    arXiv

  87. [107]

    Baumann, P.J

    D. Baumann, P.J. Steinhardt, K. Takahashi and K. Ichiki,Gravitational Wave Spectrum Induced by Primordial Scalar Perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 084019 [hep-th/0703290]

    2007 arXiv

  88. [108]

    Espinosa, D

    J.R. Espinosa, D. Racco and A. Riotto,A Cosmological Signature of the SM Higgs Instability: Gravitational Waves,JCAP09(2018) 012 [1804.07732]

    2018 arXiv

  89. [109]

    Kohri and T

    K. Kohri and T. Terada,Semianalytic calculation of gravitational wave spectrum nonlinearly induced from primordial curvature perturbations,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 123532 [1804.08577]

    2018 arXiv

  90. [110]

    Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    G. Dom` enech,Scalar Induced Gravitational Waves Review,Universe7(2021) 398 [2109.01398]

    2021 arXiv

  91. [111]

    Atal and G

    V. Atal and G. Dom` enech,Probing non-Gaussianities with the high frequency tail of induced gravitational waves,JCAP06(2021) 001 [2103.01056]. – 22 –

    2021 arXiv

  92. [112]

    Adshead, K.D

    P. Adshead, K.D. Lozanov and Z.J. Weiner,Non-Gaussianity and the induced gravitational wave background,JCAP10(2021) 080 [2105.01659]

    2021 arXiv

  93. [113]

    K.T. Abe, R. Inui, Y. Tada and S. Yokoyama,Primordial black holes and gravitational waves induced by exponential-tailed perturbations,JCAP05(2023) 044 [2209.13891]

    2023 arXiv

  94. [114]

    J.-P. Li, S. Wang, Z.-C. Zhao and K. Kohri,Primordial non-Gaussianity f N Land anisotropies in scalar-induced gravitational waves,JCAP10(2023) 056 [2305.19950]. – 23 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.