Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 130 references

Physics of 2D magnets and magnetic thin films: Surface structure and surface phase transition, criticality and skyrmions

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Surface effects drive ordering, phase transitions, and skyrmion formation in thin-film magnets.

desk verdict A useful but uneven review with a concrete, load-bearing inconsistency in the surface phase transition formula. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19741 v1 pith:POYLDIIU submitted 2024-12-27 cond-mat.stat-mech

Hung T. Diep This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech PACS 5.10.Ln64.30.+t75.50.Cc
keywords two-dimensionalmagnetismmagneticthinfilmssurfacespinreconstructionphasetransitionsfrustratedmagnetsDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionskyrmioncrystalscriticalexponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review chapter argues that surface effects—not just bulk interactions—set the observable physics of two-dimensional magnets and ultrathin films: surface spin waves, surface spin reconstruction, and surface phase transitions occur at temperatures distinct from the bulk, alongside Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya-driven skyrmion crystals. It assembles results from earlier work to show how reduced coordination at a surface changes spin ordering, how competing interactions reconstruct the surface into non-collinear arrangements confined to a few atomic layers, and how finite film thickness shifts critical behavior, producing effective exponents between the 2D and 3D values and even turning a first-order bulk transition into a second-order film transition. A sympathetic reader takes the chapter as establishing that any model of thin-film magnetism treating the surface as a passive boundary will miss the macroscopic behavior seen experimentally.

What carries the argument

The machinery is surface spin reconstruction combined with the Green's function method for non-collinear spin configurations. Surface spin reconstruction is the ground-state spin ordering near a film surface that differs from the bulk ordering, typically because surface exchange interactions differ from bulk ones or because competing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interactions are less frustrated at the surface; the surface angles, such as the umbrella tilt angle in Eq. (14) and the layer angles in Table I, are found by minimizing the layer-by-layer energy. The Green's function method for non-collinear spin configurations then converts those classical ground states into spin-wave spectra, giving layer-resolved magnetizations and transition temperatures. For skyrmions, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya term $\mathbf{D}\cdot(\mathbf{S}_i \times \mathbf{S}_j)$ competes with exchange $J$, fixing a uniform tilt angle $\theta = \arctan(-D/J)$ in the monolayer and organizing spins into a triangular skyrmion crystal under a perpendicular field, with stability measured by a spin-autocorrelation order parameter.

What would settle it

Independently compute the exact classical ground state of the $N_z = 8$ BCC helimagnetic film with $J_2/J_1 = -2$ by minimizing the layer-pair energy and compare the per-layer angles with Table I; a discrepancy between the independently obtained angles and the quoted values would falsify the claimed surface spin reconstruction and its consequences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the surface of a magnetic film is a distinct thermodynamic subsystem: it can host its own spin-wave states, reconstruct into non-collinear spin ordering, and undergo phase transitions at temperatures well separated from the bulk ordering temperature. The evidence includes a helimagnetic film where adjacent-layer angles oscillate near the surface before settling to the bulk pitch, a frustrated Heisenberg surface that forms a non-collinear umbrella described by $\cos\beta = -(J+I)/(9J_s+6I_s)$, and Monte Carlo results showing the surface layer losing its magnetization near $T_1 \simeq 0.25J/k_B$ while the next layer remains ordered to $T_2 \simeq 1.8J/k_B$. The chapter further claims that in a monolayer with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction the spin-wave spectrum crosses from $k^2$ to linear-in-$k$ behavior as the DM angle grows, and that the same interaction, with a perpendicular field, stabilizes a Bloch-type skyrmion crystal whose order parameter signals a finite-temperature transition near $T_c \simeq 0.26J/k_B$ for $D/J = 1$ and $H/J = 0.5$.

Load-bearing premise

The chapter's conclusions rest on the correctness of the author's earlier published results, especially the analytical umbrella-angle formula of Eq. (14) and the surface spin angles in Table I, which are quoted in this review without derivation; if any of those underlying calculations is wrong, the surface-reconstruction and surface-phase-transition claims lose their support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Surface spin reconstruction, not merely reduced coordination, controls the low-temperature magnetization of thin films, so layer-resolved magnetization curves can be used as fingerprints of surface exchange parameters.
  • Finite film thickness produces effective critical exponents that interpolate between 2D and 3D universality classes, implying that bulk critical exponents should not be assumed when interpreting thin-film experiments.
  • A first-order bulk transition can become second-order in very thin films, as seen in the frustrated FCC antiferromagnet at $N_z=2$, where surface spins order while interior spins remain disordered.
  • Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction progressively changes spin-wave dispersion from quadratic to linear as the tilt angle grows, a signature that should be observable in magnetic monolayer spectra.
  • Skyrmion crystals generated by DM interaction remain stable at finite temperature, supporting their use in spintronic devices where thermal stability is required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same surface reconstruction mechanism should alter surface-sensitive magnon signatures, so a testable extension is measuring layer-resolved spin-wave damping in helimagnetic films and comparing it with the reconstructed angles of Table I.
  • One could extend the skyrmion stability criterion by replacing the spin-autocorrelation order parameter with a topological-charge order parameter, which would separate thermal spin fluctuations from genuine topological melting.
  • The first-order-to-second-order crossover in a frustrated film suggests that finite thickness may soften other bulk first-order magnetic transitions, though the paper demonstrates it only for the FCC antiferromagnet.
  • The effective-exponent results imply a dimensional-crossover criterion based on the ratio of correlation length to film thickness; a direct test would measure exponents at fixed $\xi(T)/N_z$ across different thicknesses to see whether the deviations collapse onto one curve.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review chapter on the physics of 2D magnets and magnetic thin films. It covers frustration and non-collinear ground states, surface spin waves, surface spin reconstruction in helimagnetic films, surface phase transitions in films with frustrated surfaces, criticality of thin films, spin waves in monolayers with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction, and skyrmion crystals. The style is deliberately non-technical: most results are quoted from the author's prior papers, and the reader is referred to the original publications for derivations. The chapter's overall assertion is that surface and interface effects are essential for understanding macroscopic properties of thin-film magnets, and that DM interaction can stabilize skyrmion crystals.

Significance. If the summarized results are correct, the chapter offers a compact entry point to the author's long-standing research program on surface magnetism: the helimagnetic surface reconstruction in Table I, the frustrated-surface umbrella transition in Section III.C, the criticality crossover in Section IV, and the DM-induced skyrmion crystal in Section VI. Strengths of the exposition include the elementary derivation of the frustration criterion and the 120-degree structure, the simple minimization leading to θ = arctan(-D/J) in Eq. (33), and the explicit definition of a skyrmion order parameter in Eq. (40). The main weakness is that the quantitative surface phase transition example in Section III.C is internally inconsistent as printed, which prevents the reader from verifying one of the chapter's central illustrative results. No machine-checked proofs or code are provided; this is a review, so independent verification rests on the fidelity of the quoted formulas to the cited original papers.

major comments (1)
  1. [III.C, Eq. (14)] Section III.C, Eq. (14): the formula cos β = −(J + I)/(9J_s + 6I_s) is inconsistent with the parameter choice stated in the same paragraph, I = −I_s = 0.1. Substituting J = 1, I = 0.1, I_s = −0.1 gives cos β = −1.1/(9J_s − 0.6), and the boundary cos β = 1 occurs at J_s ≈ −0.0556J, not the quoted J_s^c ≈ −0.1889J. The quoted critical value is obtained only if I_s = +0.1. As printed, Eq. (14), the sign convention for I_s, and the stated J_s^c cannot all be correct. Because no derivation of Eq. (14) is given in the chapter and the reader is directed to Ref. [66], this quantitative surface phase transition example is not verifiable from the manuscript alone. Please correct the formula or the sign convention and provide the minimization condition used to derive Eq. (14).
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a duplicated word: '2D magnets and and magnetic thin films' should read '2D magnets and magnetic thin films'.
  2. [III.C, last paragraph] In the last paragraph of Section III.C, the text refers to 'model (29)', but the surface model is defined by Eq. (13); Eq. (29) appears later in Section V. Please update the cross-reference.
  3. [V] Section V contains an unresolved placeholder: 'see references cited in Refs. ? ?'. The missing references should be supplied or the phrase removed.
  4. [V] There are several typographical errors in Section V: 'monolayer opf square lattice' should be 'monolayer of square lattice', and 'interacting with each orthe via' should be 'interacting with each other via'.
  5. [VI] In Section VI, the statement that 'The SC lattice can support the DM interaction ... as in MnSi' is imprecise: MnSi has the B20 crystal structure, not a simple cubic lattice. Please specify the symmetry condition under which the DM interaction is allowed in the model considered.
  6. [References] Reference [13] has a typographical error in the journal name: 'JEPT' should be 'JETP'. Reference [98] also has a broken author string: 'D. T. Piercen J. Unguris' should likely read 'D. T. Pierce and J. Unguris'.
  7. [III.B] In Section III.B, the sentence 'We have numerically performed the numerical steepest descent method' is redundant; also, 'the detailed of the Geen's function theory' should read 'the details of the Green's function theory'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No constructional circularity: the chapter is an explicit review that defers derivations to peer-reviewed prior work; the apparent Eq. (14) inconsistency is a correctness issue, not a circularity.

full rationale

This manuscript is an explicit review: the abstract and Sec. I state that all results were published in cited papers and that the reader is referred there for derivations ('All the results shown in this chapter have been published in various research papers cited in the text. Therefore, we will discuss some important results but avoid to enter complicated methods. Instead, the reader is referred to original papers for detailed demonstrations.'). It does not claim to derive new predictions from first principles within the chapter. The load-bearing quantitative items—Eq. (14) for the umbrella angle, Table I for helimagnetic surface angles, the surface phase-transition temperatures, and the skyrmion-crystal stability curve—are imported from peer-reviewed papers by the author and collaborators, which are external sources relative to this chapter and are stated with explicit model parameters (Hamiltonians, J_s, I, D/J, H/J). Central claims also have independent external anchors: the helimagnetic surface reconstruction is connected to neutron reflectivity on Ho films [65], and skyrmion stability is connected to room-temperature experimental observations [96,98]; criticality is benchmarked against the exact 2D Ising exponents and the Capehart-Fisher scaling form [72]. The order parameter in Eq. (40) is acknowledged to be analogous to the Edwards-Anderson parameter, i.e., a standard overlap measure rather than a disguised input. I therefore find no step in which a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted parameter or to a self-referential definition. The apparent quantitative inconsistency noted for Eq. (14) (with I = -Is = 0.1, the existence boundary from -1 <= cos beta <= 1 occurs at a different J_s than the printed -0.1889J) is a correctness/consistency concern about the cited result, not a circularity, and per the rules it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The chapter introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard results from statistical mechanics and the author's prior publications, which are treated as external benchmarks. The only model parameters that appear (e.g., J2/J1, I, Is) are inputs chosen by hand, not fitted to data in this paper.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Mermin-Wagner theorem: continuous isotropic Heisenberg and XY models in 2D do not exhibit long-range order at finite temperatures.
    Invoked in Sections III.B and III.C to justify adding an anisotropic interaction to the Heisenberg model in thin films.
  • standard math Toulouse frustration criterion: a plaquette is frustrated if the product of signs of interactions around it is negative.
    Used in Section II.A, Eq. (1), to define frustration.
  • domain assumption The Green's function method for non-collinear spin configurations (Ref. [50]) is valid and sufficient for the studied systems.
    Used throughout Sections III and V to calculate spin-wave spectra and layer magnetizations, without derivation in this chapter.
  • domain assumption Capehart-Fisher scaling formula for the critical temperature shift of an Ising film (Eq. 27) is correct.
    Adopted in Section IV.A to fit MC results for Tc as a function of film thickness.
  • standard math The ground-state spin configurations for frustrated square and triangular plaquettes (Eqs. 2-4) are correctly derived in the cited literature.
    Presented in Section II.B as known results from Ref. [40] and others.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics of 2D magnets and magnetic thin films: Surface structure and surface phase transition, criticality and skyrmions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POYLDIIU

@misc{pith2026241219741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics of 2D magnets and magnetic thin films: Surface structure and surface phase transition, criticality and skyrmions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POYLDIIU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19741}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, there is an increasing renewed interest in 2D magnetism such as Van der Waals magnets. The physics of 2D magnetism and ultra-thin magnetic films has a long history. This chapter is a review devoted to some fundamental theoretical properties of 2D magnets and and magnetic thin films including frustrated systems and topological spin textures. These properties allow to understand macroscopic behaviors experimentally observed in thin films and superlattices where the surface and the interface play a crucial role. The chapter begins with a review on 2D magnets, their spin structures and phase transitions. Next, the case of thin films is considered. The theory of surface spin waves is discussed in various situations with and without surface reconstruction of spin ordering. Various interactions are taken into account: surface interaction different from the bulk one, competing interactions, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Surface phase transitions are shown in some particularly striking cases. Finally, some cases of topological spin textures called "skyrmions" are reviewed. All the results shown in this chapter have been published in various research papers cited in the text. Therefore, we will discuss some important results but avoid to enter complicated methods. Instead, the reader is referred to original papers for detailed demonstrations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Non-collinear spin configuration of frustrated triangular and square plaquettes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Antiferromagnetic triangular lattice with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Layer magnetizations versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Non-collinear surface spin configuration. Angles between spins on layer 1 are all equal (noted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Non-collinear surface spin configuration. Angles between spins on layer 1 are all equal (noted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Magnetizations of layer 1 (circles) and layer 2 (diamonds) versus temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Effective exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Critical temperature at infinite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) The ground state configuration on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Spin-wave spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Magnetizations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Ground state for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Top: Ground state for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Order parameter defined in Eq. (40) versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [66]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966). Erratum Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1307 (1966)

    work page 1966

  2. [1]

    5 0 0. 3 0. 6 0. 9 1. 2 1. 5 1. 8 2. 1 T M FIG. 11: Magnetizations M versus temperature T for a monolayer (2D) θ = 0.175 (radian), θ = 0.524, θ = 0.698, θ = 1.047 (void magenta squares, green filled squares, blue void circles and filled red circles, respectively). VI. SKYRMIONS IN A MONOLA YER A skyrmion is a vortex-like spin configuration which has a dou...

    2003

  3. [2]

    8 1 0 0. 1 0. 2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 M T FIG. 14: Order parameter defined in Eq. (40) versus T (red), for H = 0.5 and lattice size 1800 2, averaged during ta = 105 MC steps per spin after an equilibrating time t0 = 105 MC steps. The projection of the Sz(T ) on S0 z of the GS are shown in blue. See text for comments. VII. CONCLUDING REMARKS This chapter gives an...

  4. [3]

    Zangwill, Physics at Surfaces , Cambridge University Press (1988)

    A. Zangwill, Physics at Surfaces , Cambridge University Press (1988)

    1988

  5. [4]

    I and II, J.A.C

    Ultrathin Magnetic Structures , vol. I and II, J.A.C. Bland and B. Heinrich (editors), Springer-Verlag (1994)

    1994

  6. [5]

    See for example H. T. Diep, Theory of Magnetism - Application to Surface Physics , World Scientific, Singapore (2014)

    2014

  7. [6]

    Binder, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , ed

    K. Binder, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , ed. by C. Domb, J.L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1983) vol. 8

    1983

  8. [7]

    Diehl, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , ed

    H.W. Diehl, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , ed. by C. Domb, J.L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1986) vol. 10 (see also H.W. Diehl, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11, 3503 (1997))

    1997

Show all 130 references
  1. [8]

    M. N. Baibich, J. M. Broto, A. Fert, A., F. Nguyen Van Dau, F. Petroff, P. Etienne, G. Creuzet, A. Friederich, and J. Chazelas, Phys. Rev. Lett. bf 61, 2472-75 (1988)

    1988

  2. [9]

    Binash, P

    G. Binash, P. Gr¨ unberg, F. Saurenbach, and W. Zinn,Phys. Rev. B 39, 4828 (1989)

    1989

  3. [10]

    Diep, Vortex Structure in Magnetic Nanodots: Dipolar Interaction, Mobile Spin Model, Phase Transition and Melting, J

    Aurelien Bailly-Reyre and Hung T. Diep, Vortex Structure in Magnetic Nanodots: Dipolar Interaction, Mobile Spin Model, Phase Transition and Melting, J. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 528, 167813 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Xichao Zhang, Motohiko Ezawa, Yan Zhou, Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions, Sci. Rep. 5, 9400 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    I. F. Sharafullin, M. Kh. Kharrasov, and H. T. Diep, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in magnetoferroelectric superlat- tices: Spin waves and skyrmions, Phys. REv. B 99, 214420 (2019)

    2019

  6. [13]

    H. T. Diep, Ed., Frustrated Spin Systems, 3rd Edition, World Scientific, Singapore (2020)

    2020

  7. [14]

    A. N. Bogdanov, U. K. R¨ oßler and A. A. Shestakov, Skyrmions in liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E 67, 016602 (2003)

    2003

  8. [15]

    Kano and S

    K. Kano and S. Naya, Prog. Theor. Phys. 10 (1953), 158

    1953

  9. [16]

    Vaks , A

    V. Vaks , A. Larkin and Y. Ovchinnikov, Sov. Phys. JEPT 22 (1966), 820

    1966

  10. [17]

    Azaria, H

    P. Azaria, H. T. Diep and H. Giacomini, ”Coexistence of order and disorder and reentrance in an exactly solvable model”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987), 1629

    1987

  11. [18]

    Debauche, H.T

    M. Debauche, H.T. Diep, P. Azaria, and H. Giacomini, ”Exact Phase Diagram in a generalized Kagom´ e Ising lattice: Reentrance and Disorder Lines”, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991), 2369

    1991

  12. [19]

    H.T. Diep, M. Debauche and H. Giacomini, ”Exact solution of an anisotropic centered honeycomb Ising lattice: Reentrance and Partial Disorder”, Phys. Rev. B (Rapid Communication) 43 (1991), 8759

    1991

  13. [20]

    Debauche and H

    M. Debauche and H. T. Diep, ”Successive Reentrances and Phase Transitions in exactly solved dilute centered square Ising lattices”, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992), 8214

    1992

  14. [21]

    H. T. Diep, M. Debauche and H. Giacomini, ”Reentrance and Disorder Solutions in Exactly Solvable Ising Models”, J. of Mag. and Mag. Mater. 104 (1992), 184

    1992

  15. [22]

    ˘Canov´ a, J

    L. ˘Canov´ a, J. Stre˘ cka, M. Ja˘ s˘ cur, ”Geometric frustration in the class of exactly solvable Ising-Heisenberg diamond chains”, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18, 4967-4984 (2006)

    2006

  16. [23]

    Stre˘ cka, L.˘Canov´ a, M

    J. Stre˘ cka, L.˘Canov´ a, M. Ja˘ s˘ cur, M. Hagiwara, ”Exact solution of the geometrically frustrated spin-1/2 Ising-Heisenberg model on the triangulated (triangles-in-triangles) lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024427 (2008)

    2008

  17. [24]

    Stre˘ cka, Onofre Rojas, S

    J. Stre˘ cka, Onofre Rojas, S. M. de Souza, ”Spin-phonon coupling induced frustration in the exactly solved spin-1/2 Ising model on a decorated planar lattice”, Phys. Lett. A 376,197-202 (2012)

    2012

  18. [25]

    Stephenson, J

    J. Stephenson, J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970), 420

    1970

  19. [26]

    Stephenson, Can

    J. Stephenson, Can. J. Phys. 48 (1970), 2118

    1970

  20. [27]

    Stephenson, Phys

    J. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. B 1 (1970), 4405

    1970

  21. [28]

    Yoshimori, A New Type of Antiferromagnetic Structure in the Rutile Type Crystal, J

    A. Yoshimori, A New Type of Antiferromagnetic Structure in the Rutile Type Crystal, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 14, 807 (1959)

    1959

  22. [29]

    Villain, La structure des substances magnetiques, Phys

    J. Villain, La structure des substances magnetiques, Phys. Chem. Solids 11, 303 (1959)

    1959

  23. [30]

    H. T. Diep, First-Order Transition in the hexagonal-close-packed lattice with vector spins, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  24. [31]

    Hoang and H

    D.-T. Hoang and H. T. Diep, Hexagonal-Close-Packed Lattice: Ground State and Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041107 (2012) ; http://arxiv.org/abs/1112.5724

    2012 arXiv

  25. [32]

    H. T. Diep and H. Kawamura, First-order transition in the FCC Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7019 (1989)

    1989

  26. [33]

    Kawamura, ”Renormalization-group analysis of chiral transitions”, Phys

    H. Kawamura, ”Renormalization-group analysis of chiral transitions”, Phys. Rev. B 38 (1988), 4916 – Erratum Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990), 2610

    1988

  27. [34]

    Kawamura, ”Universality of phase transitions of frustrated antiferromagnets”, J

    H. Kawamura, ”Universality of phase transitions of frustrated antiferromagnets”, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10 (1998), 4707–4754

    1998

  28. [35]

    Delamotte, D

    B. Delamotte, D. Mouhanna, and M. Tissier, Nonperturbative renormalization group approach to frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B 69, 134413 (2004)

    2004

  29. [36]

    Delamotte, M

    B. Delamotte, M. Dudka, Y. Holovatch, and D. Mouhanna, About the relevance of the fixed dimension perturbative 18 approach to frustrated magnets in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104432 (2010)

    2010

  30. [37]

    Ngo and H

    V.-T. Ngo and H. T. Diep, Phase transition in Heisenberg stacked triangular antiferromagnets: End of a controversy, Phys. Rev. E 78, 031119 (2008)

    2008

  31. [38]

    Ngo and H

    V.-T. Ngo and H. T. Diep, Stacked triangular XY antiferromagnets: End of a controversial issue on the phase transition, Journal of Applied Physics 103, 07C712 (2008)

    2008

  32. [39]

    van Rees, Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiral O(N ) × O(2) universality class, arXiv:2405.19411v2

    Marten Reehorst, Slava Rychkov, Benoit Sirois and Balt C. van Rees, Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiral O(N ) × O(2) universality class, arXiv:2405.19411v2

    arXiv

  33. [40]

    C. A. S´ anchez-Villalobos, B. Delamotte, and N. Wschebor, ”O(N )× O(2) scalar models: including O( ∂2) corrections in the Functional Renormalization Group analysis”, arXiv:2411.02616v1 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Toulouse, Commun

    G. Toulouse, Commun. Phys. 2, 115 (1977)

    1977

  35. [42]

    Berge, H

    B. Berge, H. T. Diep, A. Ghazali and P. Lallemand, Phase transitions in two-dimensional uniformly frustrated XY spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3177 (1986)

    1986

  36. [43]

    E. H. Boubcheur and H. T. Diep , ”Critical behavior of the two-dimensional fully frustrated XY model”, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998), 5163

    1998

  37. [44]

    M. P. Nightingale, E. Granato, and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995), 7402

    1995

  38. [45]

    Granato and M

    E. Granato and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993), 7438

    1993

  39. [46]

    J. Lee, J. M. Kosterlitz, and E. Granato, Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991), 11531

    1991

  40. [47]

    Granato, J

    E. Granato, J. M. Kosterlitz, J. Lee, and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991), 1090

    1991

  41. [48]

    H. T. Diep, J.C.S. Levy and O. Nagai, ”Effect of surface spin-waves and surface anisotropy in magnetic thin films at finite temperature”, Physics Status Solidi (b) bf 93, 351 (1979)

    1979

  42. [49]

    H. T. Diep, ”Temperature-dependent surface magnetisation and critical temperature of ferromagnetic thin films”, Phys. Stat. Solidi (b) 103, 809 (1981)

    1981

  43. [50]

    H. T. Diep, I. Harada and O. Nagai, ”Theory of surface spin-wave in a semi-infinite ferrimagnet”, Physics Letters A 53, 157 (1975)

    1975

  44. [51]

    H. T. Diep, ”Quantum Theory of Helimagnetic Thin Films”, Phys. Rev. B 91, 014436 (2015), http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0184

    2015 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Quartu and H

    R. Quartu and H. T. Diep, Partial Order in Frustrated Quantum Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2975 (1997)

    1997

  46. [53]

    Harada and K

    I. Harada and K. Motizuki, Effect of magnon-magnon interaction on spin wave dispersion and magnon sideband in MnS, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 32, 927 (1972)

    1972

  47. [54]

    Rastelli, L

    E. Rastelli, L. Reatto and A. Tassi, Quantum fluctuations in helimagnets, J. Phys. C 18, 353 (1985)

    1985

  48. [55]

    H. T. Diep, Low-temperature properties of quantum Heisenberg helimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 40, 741 (1989)

    1989

  49. [56]

    Quartu and H

    R. Quartu and H. T. Diep, Phase diagram of body-centered tetragonal Helimagnets, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 182, 38 (1998)

    1998

  50. [57]

    S. M. Stishov, A. E. Petrova, S. Khasanov, G. Kh. Panova, A. A. Shikov, J. C. Lashley, D. Wu, and T. A. Lograsso, Magnetic phase transition in the itinerant helimagnet MnSi: Thermodynamic and transport properties, Phys. Rev. B 76, 052405 (2007)

    2007

  51. [58]

    V. D. Mello, C. V. Chianca, Ana L. Danta, and A. S. Carri¸ c, Magnetic surface phase of thin helimagnetic films, Phys. Rev. B 67, 012401 (2003)

    2003

  52. [59]

    Cinti, A

    F. Cinti, A. Cuccoli, and A. Rettori, Exotic magnetic structures in ultrathin helimagnetic holmium films, Phys. Rev. B 78, 020402(R) (2008)

    2008

  53. [60]

    L. J. Rodrigues, V. D. Mello, D. H. A. L. Anselmo and M. S. Vasconcelos, Magnetic structures in ultra-thin Holmium films: influence of external magnetic field, J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 377, 24 (2014)

    2014

  54. [61]

    E. A. Karhu, S. Kahwaji, M. D. Robertson, H. Fritzsche, B. J. Kirby, C. F. Majkrzak, and T. L. Monchesky, Helical magnetic order in MnSi thin films, Phys. Rev. B 84, 060404(R) (2011)

    2011

  55. [62]

    E. A. Karhu, U. K. R¨ oβler, A. N. Bogdanov, S. Kahwaji, B. J. Kirby, H. Fritzsche, M. D. Robertson, C. F. Majkrzak, and T. L. Monchesky, Chiral modulation and reorientation effects in MnSi thin films, Phys. Rev. B 85, 094429 (2012)

    2012

  56. [63]

    Heurich, J

    J. Heurich, J. K¨ onig, and A. H. MacDonald, Persistent spin currents in helimagnets, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064406 (2003)

    2003

  57. [64]

    Wessely, B

    O. Wessely, B. Skubic, and L. Nordstr¨ om, Spin-transfer torque in helical spin-density waves, Phys. Rev. B 79, 104433 (2009)

    2009

  58. [65]

    Jonietz, S

    F. Jonietz, S. M¨ uhlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, A. Neubauer, W. M¨ unzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. B¨ oni, R. A. Duine, K. Everschor, M. Garst, and A. Risch, Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities, Science 330, 1648 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Leiner, D

    V. Leiner, D. Labergerie, R. Siebrecht, Ch. Sutter, and H. Zabel, Investigation of the magnetism in thin single Ho(00.1) films via neutron reflectivity measurements, Physica B 283, 167 (2000)

    2000

  60. [68]

    Ngo and H

    V.-T. Ngo and H. T. Diep, Effects of frustrated surface in Heisenberg thin films, Phys. Rev. B 75, 035412 (2007)

    2007

  61. [69]

    K. G. Wilson, Renormalization Group and Critical Phenomena. I. Renormalization Group and the Kadanoff Scaling Picture, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3174 (1971)

    1971

  62. [70]

    D. J. Amit, Field theory, the renormalization group and critical phenomena , World Scientific, Singapore (1984)

    1984

  63. [71]

    Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , Cambridge University Press, London (1996)

    J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics , Cambridge University Press, London (1996)

    1996

  64. [72]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 4th ed., Oxford Univ

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena , 4th ed., Oxford Univ. Press (2002)

    2002

  65. [73]

    X. T. Pham Phu, V. Thanh Ngo and H. T. Diep, Critical behavior of magnetic thin films, Surf. Science 603, 109 (2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    T. W. Capehart and M. E. Fisher, Susceptibility scaling functions for ferromagnetic Ising films, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5021 19 (1976)

    1976

  67. [75]

    Schilbe, S

    P. Schilbe, S. Siebentritt and K. H. Rieder, Monte Carlo calculations on the dimensional crossover of thin Ising films, Phys. Lett. A 216, 20 (1996)

    1996

  68. [76]

    Caselle and M

    M. Caselle and M. Hasenbusch, Deconfinement transition and dimensional cross-over in the 3D gauge Ising model, Nucl.Phys. B 470, 435 (1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2635 (1988)

    1988

  70. [78]

    A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Physical Review Letters, Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1195 (1989)

    1989

  71. [79]

    A. M. Ferrenberg and D. P. Landau, Critical behavior of the three-dimensional Ising model: A high-resolution Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5081(1991)

    1991

  72. [80]

    Bunker, B

    A. Bunker, B. D. Gaulin, and C. Kallin, Multiple-histogram Monte Carlo study of the Ising antiferromagnet on a stacked triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15861 (1993)

    1993

  73. [81]

    X. T. Pham Phu, V. Thanh Ngo and H. T. Diep, Crossover from first to second order transition in frustrated Ising antiferromagnetic films, Phys. Rev. E 79, 061106 (2009) ; arXiv:0902.4310

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Wang and D

    F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Efficient, Multiple-Range Random Walk Algorithm to Calculate the Density of States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001)

    2001

  75. [83]

    Wang and D

    F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Determining the density of states for classical statistical models, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056101 (2001)

    2001

  76. [84]

    Brown and T.C

    G. Brown and T.C. Schulhess, Wang–Landau estimation of magnetic properties for the Heisenberg model, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10E303 (2005)

    2005

  77. [85]

    B. J. Schulz, K. Binder, M. M¨ uller, and D. P. Landau, Avoiding boundary effects in Wang-Landau sampling, Phys. Rev. E 67, 067102 (2003)

    2003

  78. [86]

    Malakis, S

    A. Malakis, S. S. Martinos, I. A. Hadjiagapiou, N. G. Fytas, and P. Kalozoumis, Entropic sampling via Wang-Landau random walks in dominant energy subspaces, Phys. Rev. E 72, 066120 (2005)

    2005

  79. [87]

    Masuo Suzuki, New Universality of Critical Exponents, Prog. Theor. Phys. 51, 1992 (1974)

    1974

  80. [88]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Thermodynamical Theory of ’Weak” Ferromagnetism in Antiferromagnetic Substances, Sov. Phys. JETP 5, 1259 (1957)

    1957

  81. [89]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

    1960

  82. [90]

    Sahbi El Hog, H. T. Diep and H. Puszkarski, Theory of magnons in spin systems with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, J. of Phys.: Condensed Matter 29, 305001 (2017)

    2017

  83. [91]

    Hayami, S.-Z

    S. Hayami, S.-Z. Lin and C. D. Batista, Bubble and skyrmion crystals in frustrated magnets with easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 93, 184413 (2016)

    2016

  84. [92]

    Okubo, S

    T. Okubo, S. Chung and H. Kawamura, Multiple- States and the Skyrmion Lattice of the Triangular-Lattice Heisenberg Antiferromagnet under Magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017206 (2012)

    2012

  85. [93]

    H. D. Rosales, D. C. Cabra and P. Pujol, Three-sublattice Skyrmions crystal in the antiferromagnetic triangular lattice, arXiv:1507.05109v1 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  86. [94]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nature Nanotechnology 8, 152 (2013)

    2013

  87. [95]

    A. O. Leonov, I. E. Dragumov, U. K. R¨ oßler and A. N. Bogdanov, Theory of skyrmion states in liquid crystals, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042502 (2014)

    2014

  88. [96]

    Ezawa, Giant Skyrmions Stabilized by Dipole-Dipole Interactions in Thin Ferromagnetic Films, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Giant Skyrmions Stabilized by Dipole-Dipole Interactions in Thin Ferromagnetic Films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 197202 (2010)

    2010

  89. [97]

    X.Z. Yu, Y. Onose, N. Kanazawa, J. H. Park, J. H. Han, Y. Matsui, N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal, Nature 465 (7300), 901 (2010)

    2010

  90. [98]

    X. Z. Yu, N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, K. Kimoto, W. Z. Zhang, S. Ishiwata, Y. Matsui, and Y. Tokura, Near room- temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin-films of the helimagnet FeGe, Nature Mater. 10, 106 (2011)

    2011

  91. [99]

    Benjamin Jungfleisch, John E

    Wanjun Jiang, Xichao Zhang, Guoqiang Yu, Wei Zhang, Xiao Wang, M. Benjamin Jungfleisch, John E. Pearson, Xuemei Cheng, Olle Heinonen, Kang L. Wang, Yan Zhou, Axel Hoffmann and Suzanne G. E. te Velthuis, Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect, Nature Physics 13, 162-169 (2017)

    2017

  92. [100]

    D. A. Gilbert, B. B. Maranville, A. L. Balk, B. J. Kirby, P. Fischer, D. T. Piercen J. Unguris, J. A. Borchers and K. Liu, Realization of ground-state artificial skyrmion lattices at room temperature, Nature Comm., published 8 Oct. 2015, DOI:10.1038/ncomms9462

    2015 doi

  93. [101]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pfleiderer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii and B. B¨ oni, Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet, Science 323, 915 (2009)

    2009

  94. [102]

    X. Z. Yu, M. Mostovoy, Y. Tokunaga, W. Z. Zhang, K. Kimoto, Y. Matsui, Y. Kaneko, N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Magnetic stripes and skyrmions with helicity reversals, PNAS 109, 8856 (2012)

    2012

  95. [103]

    Wang Kang, Yangqi Huang, Xichao Zhang, Yan Zhou, and Weisheng Zhao, Skyrmion-Electronics: An Overview and Outlook, Proceedings of the IEEE, August 2016, DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2016.2591578

    2016

  96. [104]

    S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas, Magnetic domain-wall racetrack memory, Science 320, no. 5873, pp. 190-194 (2008)

    2008

  97. [105]

    Zhou and M

    Y. Zhou and M. Ezawa, A reversible conversion between a skyrmion and a domain-wall pair in junction geometry, Nat. Commun. 5, Art. no. 4652 (2014)

    2014

  98. [106]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, G. P. Zhao, and W. Zhao, Magnetic skyrmion transistor: skyrmion motion in a voltage- gated nanotrack, Sci. Rep. 5, Art. no. 11369 (2015)

    2015

  99. [107]

    Kim et al., Voltage controlled propagating spin waves on a perpendicularly magnetized nanowire, arXiv: 1401.6910 20 (2014)

    J. Kim et al., Voltage controlled propagating spin waves on a perpendicularly magnetized nanowire, arXiv: 1401.6910 20 (2014)

    2014 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Shiota et al., Quantitative evaluation of voltage-induced magnetic anisotropy change by magnetoresistance measure- ment, Appl

    Y. Shiota et al., Quantitative evaluation of voltage-induced magnetic anisotropy change by magnetoresistance measure- ment, Appl. Phys. Expr. 4, no. 4, Art. no. 43005 (2011)

    2011

  101. [109]

    Yangqi Huang, Wang Kang, Xichao Zhang, Yan Zhou and Weisheng Zhao, Magnetic skyrmion-based synaptic devices, Nanotechnology 28, 08LT02 (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    Sai Li, Wang Kang, Yangqi Huang, Xichao Zhang, Yan Zhou and Weisheng Zhao, Magnetic skyrmion-based artificial neuron device, Nanotechnology 28, 31LT01 (2017)

    2017

  103. [111]

    A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable ”vortics” in magnetically ordered crystals: The mixed state of magnets, Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101 (1989)

    1989

  104. [112]

    R¨ oßler, A

    U.K. R¨ oßler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals, Nature 442, 797 (2006)

    2006

  105. [113]

    S. Seki, X. Z. Yu, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Observation of skyrmions in a multiferroic material, Science 336, 198 (2012)

    2012

  106. [114]

    S.-Z. Lin, A. Saxena and C. D. Batista, Skyrmion fractionalization and merons in chiral magnets with easy-plane anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B 91, 224407 (2015)

    2015

  107. [115]

    Heide, G

    M. Heide, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Bl¨ ugel, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction accounting for the orientation of magnetic domains in ultrathin films: Fe/W(110), Phys. Rev. B 78, 140403(R) (2008)

    2008

  108. [116]

    S. Rohart. and A. Thiaville, Skyrmion confinement in ultrathin film nanostructures in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii- Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184422 (2013)

    2013

  109. [117]

    Sahbi El Hog, Aur´ elien Bailly-Reyre and H. T. Diep, Stability and Phase Transition of Skyrmion Crystals Generated by Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, J. Mag. Mag. Mater. 455, 32-38 (2018)

    2018

  110. [118]

    M´ ezard, M

    M. M´ ezard, M. Parisi and M. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond An Introduction to the Replica Method and Its Applications , World Scientific, Singapore (1986)

    1986

  111. [119]

    Tretiakov, Zhipeng Hou, Wenhong Wang, Guoping Zhao, Xiaoxi Liu, Hung T

    Jing Xia, Xichao Zhang, Motohiko Ezawa, Oleg A. Tretiakov, Zhipeng Hou, Wenhong Wang, Guoping Zhao, Xiaoxi Liu, Hung T. Diep, Yan Zhou, Current-Driven Skyrmionium in a Frustrated Magnetic System, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 012403 (2020)

    2020

  112. [120]

    Tretiakov, Hung T

    Xichao Zhang, Jing Xia, Motohiko Ezawa, Oleg A. Tretiakov, Hung T. Diep, Guoping Zhao, Xiaoxi Liu, , Yan Zhou , A Frustrated Bimeronium: Static Structure and Dynamics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 052411 (2021)

    2021

  113. [121]

    Tretiakov, Hung T

    Jing Xia, Xichao Zhang, Oleg A. Tretiakov, Hung T. Diep, Jinbo Yang, Guoping Zhao, Motohiko Ezawa, Yan Zhou, Xiaoxi Liu, Bifurcation of a Topological Skyrmion String, Physical Review B 105, 214402 (2022)

    2022

  114. [122]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Xia, O. A. Tretiakov, H. T. Diep, G. Zhao, J. Yang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, Current-induced Helicity Switching of Frustrated Skyrmions on a Square-Grid Obstacle Pattern, J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. 47, 20-27 (2023)

    2023

  115. [123]

    Diep, Finsler geometry modeling and Monte Carlo study of skyrmion shape deformation by uniaxial stress, Phys

    Sahbi El Hog, Fumitake Kato, Hiroshi Koibuchi, Hung T. Diep, Finsler geometry modeling and Monte Carlo study of skyrmion shape deformation by uniaxial stress, Phys. Rev. B 104, 024402 (2021)

    2021

  116. [124]

    Diep, The stability of 3D skyrmions under mechanical stress studied via Monte Carlo calculations, Results in Physics 38, 105578 (2022)

    Sahbi El Hog, Fumitake Kato, Satoshi Hongo, Hiroshi Koibuchi, Gildas Diguet, Tetsuya Uchimoto, Hung T. Diep, The stability of 3D skyrmions under mechanical stress studied via Monte Carlo calculations, Results in Physics 38, 105578 (2022)

    2022

  117. [125]

    Diguet, B

    G. Diguet, B. Ducharne, S. El Hog, F. Kato, H. Koibuchi, T. Uchimoto, H.T. Diep, Monte Carlo Studies of Skyrmion Stabilization under Geometric Confinement and Uniaxial Strains, J. Magn. Magn. Materials 579, 170819 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    Diguet, B

    G. Diguet, B. Ducharne, S. El Hog, F. Kato, H. Koibuchi, T. Uchimoto and H. T. Diep, Monte Carlo Studies on Geo- metrically Confined Skyrmions in Nanodots: Stability and Morphology under Radial Stresses, Computational Materials Science bf 243, 113137 (2024)

    2024

  119. [127]

    Danh-Tai Hoang and H. T. Diep, Spin Transport in Magnetically Ordered Systems: Ferromagnets, Antiferromagnets and Frustrated Systems, Condensed Matter 8, 3 (2023); https://doi.org/10.3390/condmat8010003

    2023 doi

  120. [128]

    914-918 (2019)

    Takashi Kurumaji, Taro Nakajima, Max Hirschberger, Akiko Kikkawa, Yuichi Yamasaki, Hajime Sagayama, Hironori Nakao, Yasujiro Taguchi, Taka-hisa Arima, and Yoshinori Tokura, Skyrmion lattice with a giant topological Hall effect in a frustrated triangular-lattice magnet, Science...

    2019

  121. [129]

    B¨ orge G¨ obel, Alexander Mook, J¨ urgen Henk, and Ingrid Mertig, Antiferromagnetic skyrmion crystals: generation, topo- logical Hall and topological spin Hall effect, arXiv:1707.05267v1 (2017)

    2017 arXiv

  122. [130]

    Keita Hamamoto, Motohiko Ezawa, and Naoto Nagaosa, Quantized topological Hall effect in skyrmion crystal, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115417 (2015)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.