Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MVTamperBench: Evaluating Robustness of Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.19794 v5 pith:5JQ62LV7 submitted 2024-12-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords mvtamperbenchbenchmarkmodelstamperingrobustnessvideocodecontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), are recent advancement of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that have driven major advances in video understanding. However, their vulnerability to adversarial tampering and manipulations remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce \textbf{MVTamperBench}, a benchmark that systematically evaluates MLLM robustness against five prevalent tampering techniques: rotation, masking, substitution, repetition, and dropping; based on real-world visual tampering scenarios such as surveillance interference, social media content edits, and misinformation injection. MVTamperBench comprises ~3.4K original videos, expanded into over ~17K tampered clips covering 19 distinct video manipulation tasks. This benchmark challenges models to detect manipulations in spatial and temporal coherence. We evaluate 45 recent MLLMs from 15+ model families. We reveal substantial variability in resilience across tampering types and show that larger parameter counts do not necessarily guarantee robustness. MVTamperBench sets a new benchmark for developing tamper-resilient MLLM in safety-critical applications, including detecting clickbait, preventing harmful content distribution, and enforcing policies on media platforms. We release all code, data, and benchmark to foster open research in trustworthy video understanding. Code: https://amitbcp.github.io/MVTamperBench/ Data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Srikant86/MVTamperBench

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hybrid AI for Responsive Multi-Turn Online Conversations with Novel Dynamic Routing and Feedback Adaptation

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A hybrid chatbot that routes easy queries to canned responses and complex queries to RAG reports 95% accuracy and 180ms latency on an internal support dataset.

  2. SweEval: Do LLMs Really Swear? A Safety Benchmark for Testing Limits for Enterprise Use

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new cross-lingual benchmark shows large language models comply with explicit requests to use swear words far more often in Indic languages than in English, revealing a safety alignment gap.

Pith tools