Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups

Felix B. Christensen

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the symmetry TFT for N=4 SYM with so(2n) gauge algebra, including disconnected global forms, is fully determined by IIB holography once torsion cycles are allowed, and that its gapped boundary conditions reproduce…

desk verdict A solid, honest extension of the holographic SymTFT story to disconnected orthogonal gauge groups; the new torsion terms and boundary mixings are plausible and match Hsin-Lam where checked, but the least-tested new piece (gPin) sits exactly on the admitted ordinary-cohomology approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19887 v1 pith:ZNB5EYNM submitted 2024-12-27 hep-th

Felix B. Christensen This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords symmetryTFTdiscretethetaanglesdisconnectedgaugegroupsN=4supersymmetricYang-Millsholographytorsioncyclesgappedboundaryconditionsnon-invertiblesymmetries

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the symmetry TFT of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory with so(2n) gauge algebra—the five-dimensional topological theory that encodes all generalized symmetries, global forms, and discrete theta angles—can be derived completely from IIB holography once torsion cycles are allowed on the holographic boundary. Previously, holographic derivations assumed the boundary manifold had no torsion, which silently dropped terms that field-theoretic analysis predicted. By carefully including the Tor contribution in the Künneth theorem, the author obtains new couplings, in particular a term N/2 δbF1⌣cD1 and boundary conditions mixing fields of different degrees. Gapped boundary conditions of this theory then reproduce, one by one, the global forms and discrete theta angles of so(8k) and so(8k+2) theories with disconnected gauge groups, including their higher-group and non-invertible symmetries and S-duality orbits. If correct, this gives a single holographic origin for the web of symmetries that field theory had already mapped out.

What carries the argument

The central object is the five-dimensional symmetry TFT action S5D = iπ ∫ (a1⌣δa3 + bF1⌣δbNS5 + cD1⌣δcD5 + a1⌣bF1⌣cD1 + N/2 δbF1⌣cD1) written in terms of Z2 gauge fields that couple to D3, F1, D1, NS5, and D5 branes wrapped on cycles of RP5. The load-bearing mechanism is the Künneth short exact sequence: previous work kept M5 torsion-free, so the Tor1 term vanished; this paper allows torsion cycles, producing new flat differential cocycles and couplings, most notably the N/2 δbF1⌣cD1 term. The other piece of machinery is the gapped-boundary ('sandwich') construction, where a gapped boundary condition is specified by a set of operators with vanishing (higher) linking numbers; the paper extends this to boundary conditions that mix fields of different degrees, such as bF1 − (a1)2 = Be2, which are needed to reproduce Pin−(8k), O(8k)−−, and gPin theories. Fusion rules are computed from the TQFTs stacked on brane worldvolumes, confirming which 1-form symmetries are non-invertible.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to derive the same couplings from an S-duality-covariant generalized differential K-theory model of the IIB fields on RP5; if the N/2 coefficient of δbF1⌣cD1 or the (a1)2 boundary mixings change, the dictionary between boundary conditions and global forms would have to change accordingly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the symmetry TFT for N=4 SYM with so(2n) gauge algebra, including disconnected global forms, is exactly S5D = iπ ∫ (a1⌣δa3 + bF1⌣δbNS5 + cD1⌣δcD5 + a1⌣bF1⌣cD1 + N/2 δbF1⌣cD1), where all fields are Z2 gauge fields, and that this action is derivable from IIB supergravity on RP5 by relaxing the torsion-free assumption on the spacetime M5. The new ingredient is the Künneth Tor term: when M5 has torsion cycles, the dimensional reduction of the supergravity fields produces extra couplings, including terms proportional to N/2 δbF1⌣cD1 that were expected from the anomaly theory of SO(2N)+ gauge theory but had not been accounted for holographically. The paper then studies gapped boundary conditions of this TFT, including 'non-simple' boundary conditions that mix fields of different degrees such as (a1)2, and shows that each boundary condition corresponds to a global form of the gauge theory—Pin+(8k), O(8k)−+, PO(8k) variants, Pin−(8k), gPin(8k), and their so(8k+2) counterparts—with the correct discrete theta angles, anomalies, higher-group structures, and non-invertible 1-form symmetries. Applying S-duality to these boundary conditions reproduces the known duality orbits and predicts S-duality relations between the disconnected theories.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the Ramond-Ramond fields are correctly modeled by ordinary differential cohomology, so that the torsion couplings it computes are the complete story; if an S-duality covariant generalized differential K-theory produces extra or different torsion terms, the new N/2 term and the (a1)2 boundary mixings could be incorrect or incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The symmetry TFT action including the N/2 term is the complete holographic description, so the same Lagrangian should reproduce the higher-group and non-invertible symmetry data of all so(8k) and so(8k+2) global forms.
The non-simple boundary conditions show that discrete theta angles of the form (w1)2⌣w2 are genuine and appear exactly where the boundary condition bF1 − (a1)2 = Be2 is allowed, and are absent where δw2 = w1⌣w2 makes the would-be angle ill-defined.
S-duality acts on boundary conditions, so the duality orbits computed for the disconnected theories are predictions that can be checked in field theory, including the new gPin(8k) forms appearing in figure 2.
The fusion-rule computations confirm which duality orbits have non-invertible 1-form symmetries: all non-simple orbits and several simple ones, with the singlet orbit retaining a 3-group symmetry.
The obstruction argument (the triple linking of D5, NS5, and wrapped D3) explains why certain 0-form symmetries cannot be gauged in these theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same Künneth-torsion technique should apply to other holographic setups with torsion cycles in the compactification space, not just RP5, potentially generating new mixed anomaly terms in symmetry TFTs for other gauge algebras.
Because the (a1)2 boundary conditions hint at K-theoretic identifications between fluxes of different degrees, a K-theory refinement might interpret the new boundary conditions as condensation defects, connecting to the observation that D5 fat strings can be obtained from D1 branes by condensation.
The gPin(8k) theories are new global forms not previously studied; the paper's dictionary predicts their anomalies and S-duality orbits, which could be verified by direct field-theoretic analysis.
The prediction that S-duality exchanges electric and magnetic background fields in the disconnected theories, including the Z4 uplifts in so(8k+2), gives explicit partition-function identities that could be tested numerically on the lattice or in supersymmetric localization.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this paper is worth a real referee slot. It extends the holographic symmetry TFT analysis for N=4 SYM with so(2n) gauge algebra to disconnected gauge groups by dropping the torsion-free assumption on the compactification manifold. The new content is concrete: an extra N/2 δbF1⌣cD1 term in the 5D action, non-simple boundary conditions mixing fields of different degrees (the (a1)^2 terms), and a systematic matching to the Hsin-Lam classification of global forms and discrete theta angles, including new gPin theories and their S-duality orbits. The paper is careful and self-aware; it repeatedly flags what is imported, what is assumed, and what is genuinely new.

What the paper does well is the cross-checking. The boundary-condition dictionary is tested against known partition-function results, and the S-duality orbits and anomalies reproduce Hsin-Lam in case after case. The fusion-rule computations for the non-invertible symmetries are explicit and consistent. The reference list is appropriate and the claims are not oversold. The author also states plainly where the derivation is incomplete: the BF terms come from earlier work, and the use of ordinary differential cohomology for RR fields is acknowledged as an approximation, with K-theory flagged as the likely sharpening.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. The derivation of the N/2 term in §2.3 is compressed: the fibre integration from the Hopkins–Singer computation (2.9) to the final term is not shown in detail, and the answer depends on a non-canonical 0-cochain h0 with δh0=2t1. The stress-test worry that a full K-theory treatment could modify this term is real, and the paper itself concedes it. But it does not obviously sink the central results: most of the boundary-condition dictionary is benchmarked against Hsin-Lam independently of that one term, and the paper's own honesty about the caveat is a strength, not a weakness. The gapped-boundary criterion is only known to be necessary and is being assumed sufficient; the paper handles this by matching each candidate to a known global form, which is pragmatic though not a proof. The genuinely new gPin predictions have no independent field-theory check—they are the least-tested part of the paper, which is worth keeping in mind but is not a flaw by itself.

The central argument holds up about as far as it goes. This is an incremental but real advance, and it will be useful to anyone working on SymTFTs from string theory or on generalized symmetries of four-dimensional gauge theories with disconnected gauge groups. I would send it to referees, and I would ask specifically for a fuller derivation of the N/2 term or a clearer statement of what would change under K-theory.

Recommendation: accept for peer review, engage seriously, and push the author to clarify the torsion-term derivation. A revised version with that piece tightened would be a solid contribution to the literature.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a holographic derivation of the 5D symmetry TFT for N=4 SYM with so(2n) gauge algebra, including contributions from torsion cycles of RP5, resulting in the action (1.2)/(2.10). It then studies gapped boundary conditions of this TFT and argues that they reproduce the global forms and discrete theta angles classified by Hsin and Lam for so(8k) and so(8k+2), including disconnected gauge groups, higher-group and non-invertible symmetries, and S-duality orbits. A new class of "non-simple" boundary conditions mixing fields of different degrees is introduced, which leads to predictions for Pin^- and gPin theories.

Significance. If correct, the paper fills a genuine gap: previous holographic symmetry TFT treatments assumed the boundary spacetime was torsion-free, so the torsion-induced couplings were missed. The author gives explicit partition-function computations that match known field theory results in many cases, and the construction has no fitted parameters. The main caveat is that the new terms and boundary conditions are derived using ordinary differential cohomology as an approximation to K-theory; the author explicitly flags this at the end of Section 3.1.1. Until this dependence is controlled, the new gPin predictions and the enlarged S-duality orbits should be regarded as conditional rather than fully derived.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.3, Eqs. (2.9)-(2.10)] The passage from the Hopkins-Singer cocycle computation (2.9) to the N/2 δbF1⌣cD1 term in (2.10) is not shown. The h-component in (2.9) contains the non-canonical 0-cochain h0 with δh0=2t1 and a 1/4 coefficient; fibre integration over RP5 must be spelled out to verify that the result is independent of the choice of h0 and of the representative ˘u5=(u5,0,vol), and to fix the coefficient. Since this term is a central new coupling and controls the so(8k+2) and Pin^-/gPin analyses, the derivation needs to be made explicit.
[Section 3.1.1, Eqs. (3.19)-(3.36) and end of section] The non-simple boundary conditions involving (a1)^2 are load-bearing: they underlie O(8k)+-, Pin^-(8k), and gPin(8k). The paper itself states that no brane worldvolume coupling produces an (a1)^2 term and that a K-theory treatment might clarify unresolved terms. Because the RR fields are only approximated by ordinary differential cohomology, and because K-theory can relate fluxes of different degrees, these new boundary conditions may be artefacts of the approximation. The gPin predictions therefore require either a microscopic construction of the (a1)^2 boundary term or a demonstration that it is robust under the K-theory refinement. The same concern applies to the unresolved bulk terms involving higher cup products in Eqs. (3.26)-(3.27), whose role the author says is not entirely clear.
[Section 3, opening paragraph] The paper assumes that a gapped boundary condition is specified by vanishing linking numbers and higher linking numbers, while acknowledging that this is only a necessary condition. For boundary conditions matched to known Hsin-Lam theories, the matching provides evidence of sufficiency. However, for the new gPin boundary conditions, which have no independent field-theory counterpart, the sufficiency assumption is doing essential work. Thus the claimed classification of all boundary conditions of the form d2-(a1)^2 = D2 is not fully established and needs further justification or a more precise statement of its domain of validity.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.1.1, after Eq. (3.18)] The text says the theory "with" the discrete theta angle is denoted Pin^-(8k)+, but it should be Pin^-(8k)-, as used in Eqs. (3.28)-(3.29) and Figure 2.
[Section 3.1, before Eq. (3.2)] The sentence "we only sum over PO(8k)-bundles with Stiefel-Whitney classes given by w1 = B(s)_2" appears to contain a typo: w1 should be set equal to A1, the third argument of Z_Spin(8k).
[Section 2.2, Eqs. (2.6)-(2.7)] The phrase "integer uplift" is used without defining which lift of a Z2 cochain is chosen; the choice affects the cocycle representative, though not the cohomology class. This should be stated explicitly.
[Section 3.2, Eqs. (3.35), (3.37), (3.39)] Several boundary conditions write the last condition as a3|_∂M4 = A3; the boundary is M5, not M4.
[Figures 1-4] The figures are dense and the notation (which entries are Dirichlet conditions, what the +/- subscripts mean, and how Z4 uplifts are represented) is not explained in the captions. A brief caption would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SymTFT is derived from IIB on RP5 and checked against external field-theory classifications; the acknowledged K-theory limitation is an assumption risk, not a circular step.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The symmetry TFT (2.10) is obtained in Section 2 from the differential-cohomology reduction of IIB on M5 × RP5: the new N/2 δbF1 ⌣ cD1 term follows from the explicit Hopkins–Singer cocycle computation (2.9) and fibre integration, while the worldvolume couplings in (2.11)–(2.16) come from brane WZ terms. The boundary-condition dictionary is then checked against the external field-theory classifications of Aharony–Seiberg–Tachikawa [3] and Hsin–Lam [6], e.g. the O(8k)+ partition function in (3.6), the Pin−(8k)+ identification in (3.20), and the Z4 uplift relations in Section 3.2. No parameter is fitted and then renamed a prediction: the new 'gPin' and non-simple (a1)^2 boundary conditions are obtained as solutions of the declared boundary-condition ansatz and are then matched to independently known S-duality orbits and anomalies, not defined into existence by the expected answer. The one notable limitation, stated explicitly at the end of Section 3.1.1, is that ordinary differential cohomology is used as a proxy for the expected S-duality-covariant K-theory, and that 'a more careful treatment of fluxes in terms of K-theory might shed some light on both of these issues' concerning the (a1)^2 terms. This is an admitted assumption about the physical framework, not a circular step: it does not presuppose the conclusions derived from the boundary conditions. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present, since the cited framework papers [5,10,29] are not by this paper's author and the new terms are computed here rather than imported.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data. The integer N is fixed by the number of D3 branes and is an input, not an adjustable constant. The derivation relies on standard mathematical tools and on domain assumptions from string theory and the SymTFT literature. The main non-standard assumptions are the ordinary-cohomology model for RR fields, the specific flat cocycle ansatz, and the sufficiency of the linking-number criterion for gapped boundaries. The new gPin global form is an invented entity with no independent evidence.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption IIB string theory on AdS5 x RP5 is holographically dual to N=4 SYM with gauge algebra so(2n) (Witten [1]).
Used throughout to identify the 4D theory whose global forms are classified. Not proven in this paper.
ad hoc to paper RR fields can be approximated by ordinary Hopkins-Singer differential cohomology for the topological sector.
Section 2.1 states the true description is an S-duality covariant generalized differential K-theory, but ordinary cohomology is used for the present derivations.
ad hoc to paper Flat dimensionally reduced RR cocycles have the form (2.6) and (2.7), built from the torsion Künneth representative p2⊗t1+s3⊗h0.
This ansatz is the mechanism that produces the new torsion terms; it is justified by the Künneth analysis in Appendix A but is a specific representative choice.
ad hoc to paper A gapped boundary condition of the 5D SymTFT is specified by requiring vanishing (higher) linking numbers among ending operators.
Section 3 states that in general this is only necessary, not sufficient, and the paper assumes it is sufficient, checking consistency against known global forms.
domain assumption The sandwich construction encodes all global information of the 4D theory in a topological boundary of the symmetry TFT.
Framework from [7,8,46] used in all partition-function computations.
domain assumption The topological sector of F5 is expanded as N 1 + a1 u4 + a3 u2 + N u5 with u5=(u5,0,vol_RP5).
Expansion borrowed from [10]; the u5 representative choice is used in the computation of the N/2 term.
domain assumption The field-theoretic classification of global forms, discrete theta angles, and anomalies in [3] and [6] is correct.
Used as the benchmark to identify and validate boundary conditions.
domain assumption Brane worldvolume WZ couplings give the topological actions that must be stacked on symmetry defects.
Used to construct D3, D5, and NS5 defect actions and to compute fusion rules.

invented entities (1)

gPin(8k) and gPin(8k+2) gauge theories
purpose: Global forms of orthogonal gauge theory defined by the boundary condition bF1=B2(v), cD5-(a1)^2=B2(c), with bundles satisfying w2(c)=(w1)^2; introduced to complete the duality-orbit classification.
The paper states it is not aware of any literature studying such bundles and gives no independent check of the consistency of this gauge group beyond the boundary-condition dictionary.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNB5EYNM

@misc{pith2026241219887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holography and discrete theta angles for disconnected gauge groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNB5EYNM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19887}
}

abstract

Starting from holography, we derive the symmetry TFT for $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM with $\mathfrak{so}(2n)$ gauge algebra, including terms which were previously unaccounted for holographically, by considering the action of the symmetry TFT on manifolds with torsion cycles. We then study gapped boundary conditions of the symmetry TFT and show how they correspond to the global forms and discrete theta angles studied by Hsin and Lam, including their higher group and non-invertible symmetries and anomalies. In particular, we analyse the case of theories with disconnected gauge groups. Considering the action of S-duality on the boundary conditions then leads to predictions for S-duality between these theories.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Non-Abelian Symmetry Operators from Hanging Branes in $AdS_5 \times S^5$
hep-th 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

In AdS5×S5, non-Abelian SO(6) symmetry operators are realized by hanging D5-brane–KK-monopole bound states, matching the Gauss-law operators from the low-energy supergravity action.
Continuous symmetries and charge measurement of boundary operators in holography
hep-th 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Continuous symmetry operators in holography are U-shaped hanging brane bound states (D5-KK in Type IIB, M5-KK in M-theory) whose worldvolume couplings reproduce the Gauss-law symmetry operators and measure charges of ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Witten, Baryons and branes in anti de sitter space , Journal of High Energy Physics 1998 (July, 1998) 006–006

E. Witten, Baryons and branes in anti de sitter space , Journal of High Energy Physics 1998 (July, 1998) 006–006

work page 1998
[2]

Gaiotto, G

D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Framed BPS States, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013), no. 2 241–397, [ arXiv:1006.0146]

arXiv 2013
[3]

Aharony, N

O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 08 (2013) 115, [ arXiv:1305.0318]

arXiv 2013
[4]

Bergman and S

O. Bergman and S. Hirano, The holography of duality in N = 4 super-yang-mills theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (Nov., 2022)

work page 2022
[5]

Etheredge, I

M. Etheredge, I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, and S. Rauch,Branes and symmetries for N = 3 S-folds , JHEP 09 (2023) 005, [ arXiv:2302.14068]

arXiv 2023
[6]

Hsin and H

P.-S. Hsin and H. T. Lam, Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies , SciPost Physics 10 (Feb., 2021). – 26 –

work page 2021
[7]

Gaiotto and J

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132, [ arXiv:2008.05960]

arXiv 2021
[8]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 895–949, [arXiv:2112.02092]

arXiv 2023

Show all 65 references

[9]

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and C. Teleman, Topological symmetry in quantum field theory , arXiv:2209.07471

arXiv
[10]

Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria,Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries , Fortsch

I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria,Branes and Non-Invertible Symmetries , Fortsch. Phys. 70 (2022), no. 11 2200154, [ arXiv:2208.07508]

2022 arXiv
[11]

Apruzzi, I

F. Apruzzi, I. Bah, F. Bonetti, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Noninvertible Symmetries from Holography and Branes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 12 121601, [ arXiv:2208.07373]

2023 arXiv
[12]

J. J. Heckman, M. H¨ ubner, E. Torres, and H. Y. Zhang, The Branes Behind Generalized Symmetry Operators, Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023), no. 1 2200180, [ arXiv:2209.03343]

2023 arXiv
[13]

Gaiotto, A

D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172, [ arXiv:1412.5148]

2015 arXiv
[14]

Sharpe, Notes on generalized global symmetries in qft , Fortschritte der Physik 63 (Sept.,

E. Sharpe, Notes on generalized global symmetries in qft , Fortschritte der Physik 63 (Sept.,
[15]

Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups , SciPost Phys

Y. Tachikawa, On gauging finite subgroups , SciPost Phys. 8 (2020), no. 1 015, [arXiv:1712.09542]

2020 arXiv
[16]

Benini, C

F. Benini, C. C´ ordova, and P.-S. Hsin,On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies , JHEP 03 (2019) 118, [ arXiv:1803.09336]

2019 arXiv
[17]

Bhardwaj, 2-Group Symmetries in Class S , arXiv:2107.06816

L. Bhardwaj, 2-Group Symmetries in Class S , arXiv:2107.06816

arXiv
[18]

Del Zotto, I

M. Del Zotto, I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, and S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki,2-Group Symmetries and M-Theory, arXiv:2203.10097

arXiv
[19]

Apruzzi, L

F. Apruzzi, L. Bhardwaj, J. Oh, and S. Schafer-Nameki, The Global Form of Flavor Symmetries and 2-Group Symmetries in 5d SCFTs , arXiv:2105.08724

arXiv
[20]

Heidenreich, J

B. Heidenreich, J. McNamara, M. Montero, M. Reece, T. Rudelius, and I. Valenzuela, Non-invertible global symmetries and completeness of the spectrum , JHEP 09 (2021) 203, [arXiv:2104.07036]

2021 arXiv
[21]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 11 111601, [ arXiv:2111.01141]

2022 arXiv
[22]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions , Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022), no. 12 125016, [ arXiv:2111.01139]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Cordova, P.-S

C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, and N. Seiberg, Global symmetries, counterterms, and duality in chern-simons matter theories with orthogonal gauge groups , SciPost Physics 4 (Apr., 2018)

2018
[24]

Bhardwaj, L

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Non-invertible symmetry webs, SciPost Physics 15 (Oct., 2023)

2023
[25]

Bartsch, M

T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory i , SciPost Physics 17 (July, 2024)

2024
[26]

Bartsch, M

T. Bartsch, M. Bullimore, A. E. V. Ferrari, and J. Pearson, Non-invertible symmetries and higher representation theory ii , SciPost Physics 17 (Aug., 2024). – 27 –

2024
[27]

Bergman and F

O. Bergman and F. Mignosa, String theory and the SymTFT of 3d orthosymplectic Chern-Simons theory, arXiv:2412.00184

arXiv
[28]

Bonetti, M

F. Bonetti, M. Del Zotto, and R. Minasian, SymTFTs and Non-Invertible Symmetries of 6d (2,0) SCFTs of Type D from M-theory, arXiv:2412.07842

arXiv
[29]

Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria and S

I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria and S. S. Hosseini,Some aspects of symmetry descent , arXiv:2404.16028

arXiv
[30]

G. W. Moore and E. Witten, Selfduality, Ramond-Ramond fields, and K theory , JHEP 05 (2000) 032, [ hep-th/9912279]

2000 arXiv
[31]

D. S. Freed, Dirac charge quantization and generalized differential cohomology , hep-th/0011220

arXiv
[32]

Diaconescu, G

D.-E. Diaconescu, G. Moore, and E. Witten, E8 gauge theory, and a derivation of k-theory from m-theory, 2004

2004
[33]

Evslin, What does(n ’t) K-theory classify?, hep-th/0610328

J. Evslin, What does(n ’t) K-theory classify?, hep-th/0610328

arXiv
[34]

Cheeger and J

J. Cheeger and J. Simons, Differential characters and geometric invariants , in Geometry and Topology, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 50–80, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1985

1985
[35]

B¨ ar and C

C. B¨ ar and C. Becker,Differential Characters. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, 2014

2014
[36]

D. S. Freed, G. W. Moore, and G. Segal, Heisenberg Groups and Noncommutative Fluxes , Annals Phys. 322 (2007) 236–285, [ hep-th/0605200]

2007 arXiv
[37]

M. J. Hopkins and I. M. Singer, Quadratic functions in geometry, topology, and M theory , J. Diff. Geom. 70 (2005), no. 3 329–452, [ math/0211216]

2005 arXiv
[38]

Belov and G

D. Belov and G. W. Moore, Holographic Action for the Self-Dual Field , hep-th/0605038

arXiv
[39]

D. M. Belov and G. W. Moore, Type II Actions from 11-Dimensional Chern-Simons Theories, hep-th/0611020

arXiv
[40]

Hsieh, Y

C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, Anomaly Inflow and p-Form Gauge Theories , Commun. Math. Phys. 391 (2022), no. 2 495–608, [ arXiv:2003.11550]

2022
[41]

Hatcher, Algebraic Topology

A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology. Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002

2002
[42]

J. J. Heckman, M. Hubner, E. Torres, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, Top down approach to topological duality defects, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 4 046015, [ arXiv:2212.09743]

2023 arXiv
[43]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, D. S. W. Gould, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Aspects of Categorical Symmetries from Branes: SymTFTs and Generalized Charges , arXiv:2306.16405

arXiv
[44]

I. Bah, E. Leung, and T. Waddleton, Non-invertible symmetries, brane dynamics, and tachyon condensation, JHEP 01 (2024) 117, [ arXiv:2306.15783]

2024 arXiv
[45]

Bhardwaj, L

L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, S. Sch¨ afer-Nameki, and A. Tiwari, Non-invertible higher-categorical symmetries, SciPost Physics 14 (Jan., 2023)

2023
[46]

Bhardwaj and S

L. Bhardwaj and S. Schafer-Nameki, Generalized charges, part ii: Non-invertible symmetries and the symmetry tft , 2023

2023
[47]

Kapustin and N

A. Kapustin and N. Saulina, Topological boundary conditions in abelian chern–simons theory , Nuclear Physics B 845 (Apr., 2011) 393–435. – 28 –

2011
[48]

Bhardwaj, D

L. Bhardwaj, D. Pajer, S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and J. Wu, Gapped phases in (2+1)d with non-invertible symmetries: Part i , 2024

2024
[49]

Bullimore and J

M. Bullimore and J. J. Pearson, Towards All Categorical Symmetries in 2+1 Dimensions , arXiv:2408.13931

arXiv
[50]

Kaidi, E

J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries , JHEP 10 (2023) 053, [ arXiv:2301.07112]

2023 arXiv
[51]

Kaidi, G

J. Kaidi, G. Zafrir, and Y. Zheng, Non-invertible symmetries of N = 4 sym and twisted compactification, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (Aug., 2022)

2022
[52]

H. Y. Zhang, K-theoretic Global Symmetry in String-constructed QFT and T-duality , arXiv:2404.16097
[53]

R. C. Kirby and L. R. Taylor, Pin structures on low-dimensional manifolds , Geometry of low-dimensional manifolds 2 (1990) 177–242

1990
[54]

Kaidi, K

J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, and Y. Zheng, Symmetry TFTs for Non-invertible Defects , Commun. Math. Phys. 404 (2023), no. 2 1021–1124, [ arXiv:2209.11062]

2023 arXiv
[55]

W. S. MASSEY, Higher order linking numbers , Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 07 (1998), no. 03 393–414, [ https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216598000206]

1998 doi
[56]

Putrov, J

P. Putrov, J. Wang, and S.-T. Yau, Braiding statistics and link invariants of bosonic/fermionic topological quantum matter in 2+1 and 3+1 dimensions , Annals of Physics 384 (Sept., 2017) 254–287

2017
[57]

Z. Wan, J. Wang, and Y. Zheng, Quantum 4d Yang-Mills Theory and Time-Reversal Symmetric 5d Higher-Gauge Topological Field Theory , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 8 085012, [arXiv:1904.00994]

2019 arXiv
[58]

Zhang and P

Z.-F. Zhang and P. Ye, Compatible braidings with hopf links, multiloop, and borromean rings in (3 + 1)-dimensional spacetime, Physical Review Research 3 (May, 2021)

2021
[59]

Zhang and P

Z.-F. Zhang and P. Ye, Topological orders, braiding statistics, and mixture of two types of twisted bf theories in five dimensions , Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (Apr., 2022)

2022
[60]

Del Zotto, S

M. Del Zotto, S. N. Meynet, and R. Moscrop, Remarks on geometric engineering, symmetry tfts and anomalies , Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (July, 2024)

2024
[61]

Lawrie, X

C. Lawrie, X. Yu, and H. Y. Zhang, Intermediate Defect Groups, Polarization Pairs, and Non-invertible Duality Defects , arXiv:2306.11783

arXiv
[62]

Y. Choi, C. Cordova, P.-S. Hsin, H. T. Lam, and S.-H. Shao, Non-invertible Condensation, Duality, and Triality Defects in 3+1 Dimensions , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 489–542, [arXiv:2204.09025]

2023 arXiv
[63]

J. F. Davis, Lecture notes in algebraic topology / James F. Davis, Paul Kirk. Graduate studies in mathematics ; v 35. American Mathematical Society, 2001

2001
[64]

Spanier, Algebraic Topology

E. Spanier, Algebraic Topology. McGraw-Hill series in higher mathematics. Springer, 1989

1989
[65]

Greenblatt, Homology with local coefficients and characteristic classes , Homology, Homotopy and Applications 8 (2006), no

R. Greenblatt, Homology with local coefficients and characteristic classes , Homology, Homotopy and Applications 8 (2006), no. 2 91–103. – 29 –

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Witten, Baryons and branes in anti de sitter space , Journal of High Energy Physics 1998 (July, 1998) 006–006

E. Witten, Baryons and branes in anti de sitter space , Journal of High Energy Physics 1998 (July, 1998) 006–006

work page 1998

[2] [2]

Gaiotto, G

D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Framed BPS States, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013), no. 2 241–397, [ arXiv:1006.0146]

arXiv 2013

[3] [3]

Aharony, N

O. Aharony, N. Seiberg, and Y. Tachikawa, Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 08 (2013) 115, [ arXiv:1305.0318]

arXiv 2013

[4] [4]

Bergman and S

O. Bergman and S. Hirano, The holography of duality in N = 4 super-yang-mills theory , Journal of High Energy Physics 2022 (Nov., 2022)

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Etheredge, I

M. Etheredge, I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, B. Heidenreich, and S. Rauch,Branes and symmetries for N = 3 S-folds , JHEP 09 (2023) 005, [ arXiv:2302.14068]

arXiv 2023

[6] [6]

Hsin and H

P.-S. Hsin and H. T. Lam, Discrete theta angles, symmetries and anomalies , SciPost Physics 10 (Feb., 2021). – 26 –

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Gaiotto and J

D. Gaiotto and J. Kulp, Orbifold groupoids, JHEP 02 (2021) 132, [ arXiv:2008.05960]

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Apruzzi, F

F. Apruzzi, F. Bonetti, I. Garc ´ ıa Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, and S. Schafer-Nameki, Symmetry TFTs from String Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 402 (2023), no. 1 895–949, [arXiv:2112.02092]

arXiv 2023