Universal Bootstrap for Spectral Statistics: Beyond Gaussian Approximation

Dandan Jiang; Fang Yao; Guoyu Zhang

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 18 references

Universal Bootstrap for Spectral Statistics: Beyond Gaussian Approximation

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a Gaussian-proxy bootstrap is uniformly consistent for spectral statistics such as the operator norm of the sample covariance minus a hypothesized matrix, even when p/n converges to a positive constant or diverges…

desk verdict Serious, novel attempt at Gaussian-replacement bootstrap consistency for operator-norm spectral statistics in the ultra-high-dimensional regime, but the main text has a likely normalization error and a gap between the stated edge-universality theorem and the bootstrap consistency claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20019 v2 pith:F4NVOIBN submitted 2024-12-28 math.ST stat.TH

Guoyu Zhang , Dandan Jiang , Fang Yao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.STstat.TH MSC 62H1560B2062G0962E20

keywords universalbootstrapspectralstatisticsrandommatrixuniversalityoperatornormcovariancetestingultra-high-dimensionalinferencedeformedMarchenko-PasturlawTracy-Widom

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-dimensional covariance tests based on spectral statistics have lacked a usable bootstrap: standard Gaussian and multiplier bootstraps fail when p/n is not small. The paper claims that universality from random matrix theory fixes this: drawing Gaussian data with the same covariance matrix and recomputing the statistic gives a valid reference distribution for the operator norm of the sample covariance minus a hypothesized matrix. Its main theorem bounds the uniform Gaussian approximation error by $O(n^{-\delta})$ and the bootstrap size error by $O(n^{-\delta}+B^{-1/2})$, for $p/n$ converging to a nonzero constant or to infinity and without eigenvalue-decay assumptions. The same principle covers a broad class of extreme-singular-value statistics and yields sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for all linear functionals of the covariance. A sympathetic reader should care because genuinely high-dimensional covariance inference becomes computationally routine: one algorithm, no analytic distributional derivation.

What carries the argument

The engine is a weighted anisotropic local law for matrices of the form $\hat\Sigma + R$, with the perturbation $R = -\Sigma_0$. When $\Sigma$ and $R$ commute (Assumption 3), the resolvent is controlled through the $z$-dependent covariance $\Sigma(z) = z\Sigma(zI_p - \phi^{-1/2}R)^{-1}$ and the fixed point $\tilde m(z)$ of the deformed Marchenko-Pastur equation (7). This local law pins the extreme eigenvalues of $\phi^{-1/2}(\hat\Sigma+R)$ at scale $n^{-1/6}$ near deterministic edges $E_\pm$, which yields edge universality for the largest and smallest eigenvalues (Theorem 3.1). The bootstrap in Algorithms 1 and 2 is the practical mechanism; the local law is what makes Gaussian substitution without loss of distributional accuracy possible.

What would settle it

Run the universal bootstrap at level 0.05 for a non-commuting pair, e.g., $\Sigma$ diagonal with eigenvalues evenly spaced on $[1,3]$ and $\Sigma_0$ obtained by rotating a diagonal spectrum through a fixed angle, with $n=300$, $p=300$, and many replications. If the empirical rejection rate under $H_0$ does not approach 0.05 as $n$ and $p$ grow, the advertised scope without structural assumptions on $\Sigma$ and $\Sigma_0$ is false; a vanishing $\rho_n(\Sigma_0)$ in (12) is the precise quantity to check.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the distribution of the spectral statistic $T = \|\hat\Sigma - \Sigma_0\|_{\mathrm{op}}$ is asymptotically unchanged when the data's entry distribution is replaced by a Gaussian with the same covariance matrix, so the bootstrap can be computed by drawing $Y_1,\dots,Y_n \sim N(0,\Sigma)$ and using the empirical quantiles of $T^{\mathrm{ub}} = \|\hat\Sigma^{\mathrm{ub}} - \Sigma_0\|_{\mathrm{op}}$. Theorem 3.2 states that for any admissible pair $(\Sigma,\Sigma_0)$ — nonnegative matrices satisfying boundedness, a bulk non-degeneracy condition, and the commutation $\Sigma(-\Sigma_0) = (-\Sigma_0)\Sigma$ — the uniform Gaussian approximation error $\rho_n(\Sigma_0) = \sup_{t\ge 0}|P(\hat\Sigma \in B_{\mathrm{op}}(\Sigma_0,t)) - P(\hat\Sigma^{\mathrm{ub}} \in B_{\mathrm{op}}(\Sigma_0,t))|$ is $O(n^{-\delta})$, and $\sup_\alpha |P(T \ge \hat q^{\mathrm{ub}}) - \alpha| = O(n^{-\delta} + B^{-1/2})$. Theorem 3.3 extends the same statement to statistics built from several extreme singular values, and Theorem 4.2 converts it into simultaneous confidence intervals for $\langle A,\Sigma\rangle$ over all $A$. As a byproduct, the paper derives the Tracy-Widom law for the largest sample-covariance eigenvalue in the ultra-high-dimensional regime for general entry distributions, where only the Gaussian case was previously known.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the commuting-pair condition: the hypothesized covariance $\Sigma_0$ and the true covariance $\Sigma$ must share all eigenvectors; if a testing problem violates this, the paper gives no guarantee that the bootstrap size converges.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The universal bootstrap controls the type I error of operator-norm covariance tests uniformly in the level $\alpha$, in both the proportional regime $p/n \to c>0$ and the ultra-high-dimensional regime $p/n \to \infty$, without eigenvalue decay or low effective rank.
The combined statistic $T^{\mathrm{Com}} = T^2/\mathrm{tr}(\Sigma_0) + (T^{\mathrm{Roy}})^2$ inherits bootstrap consistency and is shown numerically to keep high power in both spike and white-noise alternatives.
Power analysis under the generalized spike model yields a sharp BBP-type phase transition: spikes above $\kappa$ are detected with power tending to 1, while spikes below $\kappa$ are asymptotically invisible to the test.
Sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for $\langle A,\Sigma\rangle$ over all $A \in \mathbb{R}^{p\times p}$ hold with error $O(n^{-\delta} + d_{\mathrm{Sp}}(\widehat{\mathrm{Sp}}(\Sigma), \mathrm{Sp}(\Sigma)) + B^{-1/2})$, covering quadratic forms $c_1^\top \Sigma c_2$ as a special case.
The distribution of operator-norm spectral statistics depends only on the first two moments of the entries, in contrast to Frobenius- and supremum-norm statistics whose limiting laws require fourth-moment information.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: if the commutation assumption can be relaxed to approximate commutation with a small commutator norm, the same bootstrap should extend to arbitrary covariance-testing pairs; the obstacle is a non-commuting analog of the deformed Marchenko-Pastur local law, which the paper does not address.
Editorial inference: because the operator norm is insensitive to fourth moments, tests calibrated by this bootstrap may remain valid for heavier-tailed data than the $t(12)$ used in simulations, as long as Assumption 1's moment bounds hold; this is testable by simulation with $t(5)$ or lognormal entries.
Editorial inference: the simultaneous confidence intervals of Theorem 4.2 give a direct route to portfolio- or factor-model diagnostics: any null hypothesis expressible as all linear functionals $\langle A,\Sigma\rangle$ lying in prescribed ranges can be checked with one bootstrap computation, at cost independent of the number of $A$'s.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper deserves attention: the central idea is clean and genuinely new. A Gaussian-replacement bootstrap, justified by edge universality, is claimed to work for operator-norm spectral statistics even when p/n diverges and no eigen-decay is imposed. That goes beyond Han et al., Lopes et al., and Giessing, all of which need low effective rank or p much smaller than n. The generalized T_ExS class is useful, the power comparison between T, T_Roy and T_Com is a nice touch, and the simulations are honest and fairly extensive, showing size control across several heavy-tailed and non-identical designs.

The soft spots, in proportion. First, Assumption 3 (Sigma R = R Sigma) restricts the pair to share eigenvectors. That is a real structural condition, not just a technical footnote, and the abstract's 'no structural assumptions' overstates the actual scope. The non-commuting case is simply not addressed.

Second, the proof of Theorem 3.2 is entirely in the supplement, and the main text alone does not bridge the gap. T is the maximum of the largest and minus-smallest eigenvalue. Theorem 3.1 states marginal universality for lambda_1, and for lambda_p only in the proportional regime. Marginal universality does not automatically give joint universality of the two edges, and for gamma > 1 the negative edge is not even covered by the stated theorem. Unless the supplement shows that the opposite edge is deterministic on the relevant scale or establishes the joint law, the operator-norm bootstrap consistency does not follow from the displayed results. The equal-endpoint case in Assumption 4' is exactly where this bites hardest.

Third, Corollary 1 looks wrong as written. For gamma > 1, the Wishart edge for lambda_1(Z^T Z) is (sqrt(p)+sqrt(n))^2, not p. The missing 2 sqrt(pn) term is much larger than the claimed fluctuation scale p^{1/2} n^{-1/6}, so Tracy-Widom convergence with that centering cannot hold. Unless a different normalization is hiding somewhere, this is a concrete error in the main text.

The simulations and the generalized universality idea suggest this is not a throwaway preprint. But the central theorem is not checkable from the body, the commutativity assumption narrows the advertised scope, and Corollary 1 should be fixed. A serious referee should look at it; if the supplementary proofs hold up, this is a meaningful contribution. If not, the edge cases need substantial rework.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'universal bootstrap' for spectral statistics of sample covariance matrices: replace the original data by Gaussian observations with the same covariance and use the resulting quantiles of statistics such as T = ||hat Sigma - Sigma0||_op. Theorems 3.1–3.3 claim edge universality and uniform Gaussian-approximation bounds for the operator-norm ball and its generalizations, in both proportional p/n and ultra-high-dimensional p/n -> infinity regimes. The paper also gives power analysis for covariance tests and simultaneous confidence intervals, supported by simulations and a climate data application.

Significance. If the deferred proofs are correct, the universal bootstrap is an appealing and potentially important idea: it would provide a way to obtain distributional approximations for extreme spectral statistics in regimes where empirical and multiplier bootstrap are known to fail. The paper is explicit about algorithms (Algorithm 1 and 2), reports extensive simulation evidence, and includes a real-data demonstration. The claim that the asymptotic distribution depends only on the first two moments for the operator-norm-based statistic, in contrast to Frobenius/supremum norms, is a noteworthy conceptual contribution. The main theorems are, however, not fully checkable from the preprint body because all proofs are in the supplementary material, and the issues described below affect the central claims.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.1, Corollary 1 (Eq. (10))] The centering mu = p is not the correct deterministic location of the largest eigenvalue of Z^T Z when p/n -> infinity and Z is an n x p standard normal matrix. The Wishart edge is approximately (sqrt(p)+sqrt(n))^2 = p + 2 sqrt(pn) + n, so centering at p leaves a deterministic bias of order sqrt(pn). Compared with the claimed fluctuation scale sigma = p^{1/2} n^{-1/6}, this bias tends to infinity like n^{2/3}. Thus (10) cannot follow from Theorem 3.1 as stated, and the ultra-high-dimensional Tracy-Widom assertion needs either a corrected centering (e.g., (sqrt(p)+sqrt(n))^2) or a different normalization.
[Section 3.2, Theorem 3.2] The statistic T = ||hat Sigma - Sigma0||_op is the maximum of lambda_1(M_n) and -lambda_p(M_n), a joint event involving both extreme eigenvalues. Theorem 3.1 provides universality only for the marginal CDF of lambda_1, and for gamma > 1 it gives no statement about lambda_p. Uniform Gaussian approximation for the CDF of the maximum requires either a joint universality result for the pair of extreme eigenvalues, or a deterministic argument showing that the opposite edge is negligible on the n^{-2/3} scale. No such argument appears in the main text, and since Theorem 3.2 is the central bootstrap-consistency claim, this gap is load-bearing. The proof in the supplement must be made available and its key step stated in the main text.
[Assumption 3 and abstract] Assumption 3 requires Sigma R = R Sigma with R = -Sigma0, i.e., Sigma and Sigma0 share all eigenvectors. This is a structural condition on the pair of matrices, not merely an eigenvalue-decay or low-rank condition. The abstract's statement that the method works 'without requiring structural assumptions on the population covariance matrix' is therefore too strong. The assumption is automatic for the null hypothesis H0: Sigma = Sigma0, but for general pairs (Sigma, Sigma0) and for the power analysis in Section 4.1 it restricts the model to common-eigenvector structures. The paper should explicitly delineate the class of covariance pairs covered by the theory.
[Section 3.2, Eq. (11)-(13)] Even if the joint-edge issue is resolved, the rate rho_n(Sigma0) <= n^{-delta} is left as an unspecified positive delta. Since the bootstrap quantile error in (13) is stated as O(rho_n(Sigma0) + B^{-1/2}), an explicit delta (or at least an explicit modulus) would be needed to assess whether the result is non-vacuous for practical sample sizes. This is not a fatal objection, but it should be addressed in a revision.

minor comments (4)

[References] The reference 'Alex, B., Erdős, L., ... ' appears to be a garbled version of a standard isotropic local law paper; please correct the author name and bibliographic details.
[Section 5.1] The sentence 'we examine the following distributions: Gaussian distribution, Uniform and t-distributions, Gaussian and uniform distributions , and Gaussian and t-distributions .' is incomplete and unclear; please specify exactly which of the first n/2 and last n/2 rows receive which entry distribution in each scenario.
[Theorem 4.1, Eq. (19)] The displayed formula for kappa contains a double fraction that is hard to read; please rewrite it with explicit parentheses and define all quantities (E_+, tilde m) in the statement of Theorem 4.1, not only by reference to Section 3.
[General] All proofs are deferred to the supplementary material. For a journal submission, please ensure the supplement is part of the review package and provide a short proof sketch or a precise statement of the key lemmas in the main text, especially for Theorem 3.2 and Theorem 3.3, which are the main contributions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Gaussian-surrogate bootstrap is justified by an independent universality theorem rather than by construction; the only author self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: Theorem 3.2's target rho_n(Sigma0) compares the law of T under the original entries with the law of T^ub under Gaussian entries having the same covariance, and this comparison is supplied by Theorem 3.1's universality bound, which is a nontrivial edge-universality statement with proofs deferred to the supplement, not by the definition of the bootstrap statistic. The universal bootstrap statistic is not defined to equal T; Algorithm 1 explicitly draws independent standard normal Z^b and forms Y^b = Z^b Sigma^{1/2}, so the Gaussian case is an external benchmark. No parameter is fitted to data whose distribution is then predicted: the covariance Sigma is either hypothesized (Sigma0 in the test) or estimated by external spectral estimators such as Ledoit-Wolf and Kong-Valiant, and those estimators enter only through an additive error term d_Sp in Theorem 4.2. The paper's only apparent self-citation, Jiang & Bai (2021), is used in Section 4 merely to frame the generalized spike model for power analysis; the phase-transition formula (19) is derived in the paper, and the bootstrap consistency theorems do not rest on that citation. The paper itself flags the limitations relevant to the skeptic's attack: Assumption 3 requires Sigma R = R Sigma and is described as 'imposed for technical requirements,' and Theorem 3.1 states that the lambda_p analogue holds only 'When gamma = 1,' so the gamma > 1 operator-norm reduction and the joint-edge issue in Theorem 3.2 are correctness gaps to be checked in the supplement, not reductions of the conclusion to an input. The centering in Corollary 1 is likewise a separate numerical-check concern. No circular step satisfying the quoted-evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The paper introduces auxiliary objects such as the z-dependent covariance Sigma(z) and the deformed MP fixed point, but these are technical functions, not postulated entities with independent falsifiable handles. The central claim rests on the seven listed axioms, whose proofs are not fully present in the main text.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Independent entries with zero mean, unit variance and all moments bounded (Assumption 1).
Required for the Lindeberg exchange and local law argument; stronger than necessary, but clearly stated and used throughout the proofs.
domain assumption Bounded spectral norms and no spectral collapse for Sigma and R (Assumption 2).
The condition ||Sigma||_op, ||R||_op <= C and F_Sigma(c1) <= c2 keeps the deformed Marchenko-Pastur problem well posed.
ad hoc to paper Sigma and R commute, Sigma R = R Sigma (Assumption 3).
A technical condition forcing shared eigenvectors; it restricts applicability and is not highlighted in the abstract's claim of no structural assumptions.
domain assumption Extreme eigenvalues of Sigma(E+) are separated from the deformed MP endpoints (Assumption 4 and 4').
Standard edge-universality condition; Assumption 4' weakens it for singular value statistics and is used to make T and T Roy admissible.
standard math The deformed Marchenko-Pastur fixed point exists, is unique and governs the local law (Equation 7).
Background random matrix machinery; existence and uniqueness are deferred to the supplement.
standard math Gaussian Wishart Tracy-Widom limit for p/n to infinity (Karoui 2003) is available for the Gaussian case of Corollary 1.
External benchmark for the universality corollary; the paper's own centering in Corollary 1 appears inconsistent with this benchmark.
domain assumption A consistent spectral estimator cSp(Sigma) exists for the simultaneous confidence intervals in Theorem 4.2.
Needed when Sigma is unknown; the paper cites Ledoit-Wolf and Kong-Valiant estimators but only notes them for the gamma = 1 regime.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Bootstrap for Spectral Statistics: Beyond Gaussian Approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F4NVOIBN

@misc{pith2026241220019,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Bootstrap for Spectral Statistics: Beyond Gaussian Approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F4NVOIBN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20019}
}

abstract

Spectral analysis plays a crucial role in high-dimensional statistics, where determining the asymptotic distribution of various spectral statistics remains a challenging task. Due to the difficulties of deriving the analytic form, recent advances have explored data-driven bootstrap methods for this purpose. However, widely used Gaussian approximation-based bootstrap methods, such as the empirical bootstrap and multiplier bootstrap, have been shown to be inconsistent in approximating the distributions of spectral statistics in high-dimensional settings. To address this issue, we propose a universal bootstrap procedure based on the concept of universality from random matrix theory. Our method consistently approximates a broad class of spectral statistics across both high- and ultra-high-dimensional regimes, accommodating scenarios where the dimension-to-sample-size ratio $p/n$ converges to a nonzero constant or diverges to infinity without requiring structural assumptions on the population covariance matrix, such as eigenvalue decay or low effective rank. We showcase this universal bootstrap method for high-dimensional covariance inference. Extensive simulations and a real-world data study support our findings, highlighting the favorable finite sample performance of the proposed universal bootstrap procedure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20019 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Empirical powers of the supremum, the Frobenius, and the proposed operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

E., Pajor, A

Adamczak, R., Litvak, A. E., Pajor, A. & Tomczak-Jaegermann, N. (2011), ‘Sharp bounds on the rate of convergence of the empirical covariance matrix’, Comptes Ren- dus. Math´ ematique349(3-4), 195–200. Alex, B., Erd˝ os, L., Knowles, A., Yau, H.-T. & Yin, J. (2014), ‘Isotropic local laws for sample covariance and generalized Wigner matrices’, Electronic Jo...

work page 2011
[53]

& Silverstein, J

Bai, Z. & Silverstein, J. W. (2010), Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, Vol. 20, Springer. Baik, J., Arous, G. B. & P´ ech´ e, S. (2005), ‘Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices’, The Annals of Probability 33(5), 1643 –

work page 2010
[294]

(2004), ‘The asymptotic distributions of the largest entries of sample correlation matrices’, The Annals of Applied Probability 14(2), 865 –

Jiang, T. (2004), ‘The asymptotic distributions of the largest entries of sample correlation matrices’, The Annals of Applied Probability 14(2), 865 –

work page 2004
[421]

& Xiao, L

Bunea, F. & Xiao, L. (2015), ‘On the sample covariance matrix estimator of reduced effective rank population matrices, with applications to fPCA’, Bernoulli 21(2), 1200 –

work page 2015
[714]

Ke, Z. T. (2016), ‘Detecting rare and weak spikes in large covariance matrices’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.00883 . Knowles, A. & Yin, J. (2017), ‘Anisotropic local laws for random matrices’, Probability Theory and Related Fields 169, 257–352. Koltchinskii, V. & Lounici, K. (2017), ‘Concentration inequalities and moment bounds for sample covariance operato...

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[835]

X., Qiu, Y

Chen, S. X., Qiu, Y. & Zhang, S. (2023), ‘Sharp optimality for high-dimensional covariance testing under sparse signals’, The Annals of Statistics 51(5), 1921–1945. Chen, S. X., Zhang, L.-X. & Zhong, P.-S. (2010), ‘Tests for high-dimensional covariance matrices’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490), 810–819. 30 Chernozhukov, V., Chetv...

work page 2023
[880]

Karoui, N. E. (2003), ‘On the largest eigenvalue of wishart matrices with identity covariance when n, p and p/n tend to infinity’, arXiv preprint math/0309355 . 32 Karoui, N. E. (2007), ‘Tracy–Widom limit for the largest eigenvalue of a large class of complex sample covariance matrices’, The Annals of Probability 35(2), 663 –

arXiv 2003
[1230]

& Xia, Y

Cai, T., Liu, W. & Xia, Y. (2013), ‘Two-sample covariance matrix testing and support recovery in high-dimensional and sparse settings’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(501), 265–277. Cai, T. T. & Jiang, T. (2011), ‘Limiting laws of coherence of random matrices with appli- cations to testing covariance structure and construction of comp...

work page 2013

Show all 18 references

[1525]

T., Liu, W

Cai, T. T., Liu, W. & Xia, Y. (2014), ‘Two-sample test of high dimensional means under dependence’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 76(2), 349–372. Cai, T. T. & Ma, Z. (2013), ‘Optimal hypothesis testing for high dimensional covarianc...

2014
[1697]

& Silverstein, J

Baik, J. & Silverstein, J. W. (2006), ‘Eigenvalues of large sample covariance matrices of spiked population models’, Journal of multivariate analysis 97(6), 1382–1408. 29 Bao, Z., Pan, G. & Zhou, W. (2015), ‘Universality for the largest eigenvalue of sample covariance matrices...

2006
[1833]

Hult, H. et al. (2012), Risk and portfolio analysis: Principles and methods , Springer. Jiang, D. & Bai, Z. (2021), ‘Generalized four moment theorem and an application to CLT for spiked eigenvalues of high-dimensional covariance matrices’, Bernoulli 27(1), 274 –

2012
[2106]

(2023), ‘Gaussian and bootstrap approximations for suprema of empirical processes’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01307

Giessing, A. (2023), ‘Gaussian and bootstrap approximations for suprema of empirical processes’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01307 . Han, F., Xu, S. & Zhou, W.-X. (2018), ‘On Gaussian comparison inequality and its appli- cation to spectral analysis of large random matrices’, Ber...

2023 arXiv
[2247]

& Wolf, M

Ledoit, O. & Wolf, M. (2015), ‘Spectrum estimation: A unified framework for covari- ance matrix estimation and pca in large dimensions’, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 139, 360–384. Lee, J. O. & Schnelli, K. (2016), ‘Tracy–Widom distribution for the largest eigenvalue of rea...

2015
[2388]

Chen, S. X. & Qin, Y.-L. (2010), ‘A two-sample test for high-dimensional data with appli- cations to gene-set testing’, The Annals of Statistics 38(2), 808 –

2010
[2513]

33 Lopes, M. E. (2022 b), ‘Improved rates of bootstrap approximation for the operator norm: A coordinate-free approach’, arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03050 . Lopes, M. E., Blandino, A. & Aue, A. (2019), ‘Bootstrapping spectral statistics in high dimensions’, Biometrika 106(4), 78...

2019 arXiv
[2819]

& Kato, K

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. & Kato, K. (2017), ‘Central limit theorems and boot- strap in high dimensions’, The Annals of Probability 45(4), 2309–2352. Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D. & Koike, Y. (2023), ‘Nearly optimal central limit theo- rem and bootstrap approximati...

2017
[3320]

& Koike, Y

Fang, X. & Koike, Y. (2024), ‘Large-dimensional central limit theorem with fourth-moment error bounds on convex sets and balls’, The Annals of Applied Probability 34(2), 2065–

2024
[3839]

& Zhang, X

Li, Y., Chen, K., Yan, J. & Zhang, X. (2021), ‘Uncertainty in optimal fingerprinting is underestimated’, Environmental Research Letters 16(8), 084043. Lopes, M. E. (2022 a), ‘Central limit theorem and bootstrap approximation in high dimen- sions: Near 1 /√n rates via implicit ...

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

E., Pajor, A

Adamczak, R., Litvak, A. E., Pajor, A. & Tomczak-Jaegermann, N. (2011), ‘Sharp bounds on the rate of convergence of the empirical covariance matrix’, Comptes Ren- dus. Math´ ematique349(3-4), 195–200. Alex, B., Erd˝ os, L., Knowles, A., Yau, H.-T. & Yin, J. (2014), ‘Isotropic local laws for sample covariance and generalized Wigner matrices’, Electronic Jo...

work page 2011

[2] [53]

& Silverstein, J

Bai, Z. & Silverstein, J. W. (2010), Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices, Vol. 20, Springer. Baik, J., Arous, G. B. & P´ ech´ e, S. (2005), ‘Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices’, The Annals of Probability 33(5), 1643 –

work page 2010

[3] [294]

(2004), ‘The asymptotic distributions of the largest entries of sample correlation matrices’, The Annals of Applied Probability 14(2), 865 –

Jiang, T. (2004), ‘The asymptotic distributions of the largest entries of sample correlation matrices’, The Annals of Applied Probability 14(2), 865 –

work page 2004

[4] [421]

& Xiao, L

Bunea, F. & Xiao, L. (2015), ‘On the sample covariance matrix estimator of reduced effective rank population matrices, with applications to fPCA’, Bernoulli 21(2), 1200 –

work page 2015

[5] [714]

Ke, Z. T. (2016), ‘Detecting rare and weak spikes in large covariance matrices’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.00883 . Knowles, A. & Yin, J. (2017), ‘Anisotropic local laws for random matrices’, Probability Theory and Related Fields 169, 257–352. Koltchinskii, V. & Lounici, K. (2017), ‘Concentration inequalities and moment bounds for sample covariance operato...

work page Pith review arXiv 2016

[6] [835]

X., Qiu, Y

Chen, S. X., Qiu, Y. & Zhang, S. (2023), ‘Sharp optimality for high-dimensional covariance testing under sparse signals’, The Annals of Statistics 51(5), 1921–1945. Chen, S. X., Zhang, L.-X. & Zhong, P.-S. (2010), ‘Tests for high-dimensional covariance matrices’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490), 810–819. 30 Chernozhukov, V., Chetv...

work page 2023

[7] [880]

Karoui, N. E. (2003), ‘On the largest eigenvalue of wishart matrices with identity covariance when n, p and p/n tend to infinity’, arXiv preprint math/0309355 . 32 Karoui, N. E. (2007), ‘Tracy–Widom limit for the largest eigenvalue of a large class of complex sample covariance matrices’, The Annals of Probability 35(2), 663 –

arXiv 2003

[8] [1230]

& Xia, Y

Cai, T., Liu, W. & Xia, Y. (2013), ‘Two-sample covariance matrix testing and support recovery in high-dimensional and sparse settings’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 108(501), 265–277. Cai, T. T. & Jiang, T. (2011), ‘Limiting laws of coherence of random matrices with appli- cations to testing covariance structure and construction of comp...

work page 2013