Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Efficient Multi-Agent Collaboration with Tool Use for Online Planning in Complex Table Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.20145 v2 pith:RX2JUSX2 submitted 2024-12-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords closed-sourcellmsmactbenchmarkscollaborationcomplexfine-tuningmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Complex table question answering (TQA) aims to answer questions that require complex reasoning, such as multi-step or multi-category reasoning, over data represented in tabular form. Previous approaches demonstrated notable performance by leveraging either closed-source large language models (LLMs) or fine-tuned open-weight LLMs. However, fine-tuning LLMs requires high-quality training data, which is costly to obtain, and utilizing closed-source LLMs poses accessibility challenges and leads to reproducibility issues. In this paper, we propose Multi-Agent Collaboration with Tool use (MACT), a framework that requires neither closed-source models nor fine-tuning. In MACT, a planning agent and a coding agent that also make use of tools collaborate to answer questions. Our experiments on four TQA benchmarks show that MACT outperforms previous SoTA systems on three out of four benchmarks and that it performs comparably to the larger and more expensive closed-source model GPT-4 on two benchmarks, even when using only open-weight models without any fine-tuning. We conduct extensive analyses to prove the effectiveness of MACT's multi-agent collaboration in TQA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeALOG: Decentralized Multi-Agents Log-Mediated Reasoning Framework

    cs.CL 2026-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    DeALOG lets five specialized LLM agents cooperate through a shared text log, and the paper claims this gives competitive zero-shot accuracy on six table/text/image QA benchmarks.

Pith tools