Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 102 references

Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Standard-model Feynman integrals produce special Fano varieties, not just Calabi-Yau ones.

desk verdict A correct degree-counting observation about special Fano configurations in Symanzik polynomials is stretched into unsupported Hodge-theoretic claims about the actual hypersurfaces. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20236 v1 pith:TIM4T63W submitted 2024-12-28 hep-th

Rolf Schimmrigk This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 81T1814J3214J4532G20
keywords FeynmanintegralsSymanzikpolynomialsspecialFanovarietiesCalabi-YauPicard-FuchsequationsHodgestructureperiodgraphgeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that special Fano varieties — a class of projective hypersurfaces that contains Calabi-Yau manifolds as the charge $Q=1$ special case — arise naturally from the Symanzik polynomials of Feynman integrals. Many standard-model graphs, including the two-loop vertex graphs that appear after tensor-spinor reduction in QED, yield hypersurfaces $X_U$ and $X_F$ whose first Chern class satisfies the special-Fano quantization condition. This matters because special Fano Hodge structure is thinner than Calabi-Yau Hodge structure of the same dimension: the two-loop vertex graph's cubic fourfold $X_F \in P^5[3]$ has a Picard-Fuchs equation of order three, the same order as a K3 surface, and the paper identifies its motive as of K3 type. The paper's picture makes the Calabi-Yau-focused geometric study of Feynman integrals one slice of a wider special-Fano framework, with the charge $Q$ controlling the order of period equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the special Fano variety, defined here for weighted projective hypersurfaces $X_n \subset \mathbb{P}(w_1,\ldots,w_{n+2})$ of degree $d$ by the first Chern class condition $c_1(X)=(Q-1)d\,h$, equivalent to $\sum_i w_i = Q d$; $Q=1$ recovers Calabi-Yau hypersurfaces, and $Q>1$ shifts the Hodge decomposition of the middle cohomology inward, with the residue form $\Omega_Q=(1/2\pi i)\oint_C \sigma/p^Q$ generating the $(n-(Q-1),Q-1)$ part. The paper converts this into Feynman language through the parametric integral representation: after tensor-spinor reduction, the two Symanzik polynomials $U$ and $F$ of an $\ell$-loop, $n_{\mathrm{int}}$-line graph define hypersurfaces $X_U\in P^{n_{\mathrm{int}}-1}[\ell]$ and $X_F\in P^{n_{\mathrm{int}}-1}[\ell+1]$, and the special-Fano quantization conditions $Q_U\ell=n_{\mathrm{int}}$ and $Q_F(\ell+1)=n_{\mathrm{int}}$ make the maximally cut integrand exactly the residue form $\sigma/F^{Q_F}$. What this condition buys is a period equation whose order, in simple cases, drops from the Calabi-Yau value $n+1$ to $n+3-2Q$, with monodromy nilpotency controlled by the Hodge width rather than by the dimension alone.

What would settle it

Find a point in the mass-and-kinematic parameter space where the second Symanzik polynomial of, say, the two-loop vertex graph defines a singular cubic fourfold in $P^5[3]$, then compute the order of the Picard-Fuchs operator of the family at that point; if the order moves off 3, the smooth K3-type motive statement fails for that graph.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for an $\ell$-loop Feynman graph with $n_{\mathrm{int}}$ internal lines, the first and second Symanzik polynomials $U$ and $F$ of degrees $\ell$ and $\ell+1$ define hypersurfaces $X_U \in P^{n_{\mathrm{int}}-1}[\ell]$ and $X_F \in P^{n_{\mathrm{int}}-1}[\ell+1]$, and these are of special Fano type whenever the integer-charge conditions $Q_U \ell = n_{\mathrm{int}}$ or $Q_F(\ell+1)=n_{\mathrm{int}}$ hold. For the two-loop vertex configuration $(\ell,n_{\mathrm{int}})=(2,6)$ that appears in QED, this yields $X_U \in P^5[2]$ with $Q_U=3$ and $X_F \in P^5[3]$ with $Q_F=2$; the paper concludes that the cubic fourfold, after removing the ambient contribution, carries a motive of K3 type. The same mechanism produces infinite families, such as iterated Mercedes-Benz graphs with charge $Q=2$ in configurations $P^{7+6n}[4+3n]$, and a doubly infinite family obtained by attaching one-loop boxes to an $n$-point loop and satisfying $n_{\mathrm{poly}} - Q(\ell+1)+3\ell-1=0$. The paper presents these geometries as the natural setting for the period integrals of maximally cut Feynman integrals, with the charge $Q$ reducing the order of the Picard-Fuchs equation relative to Calabi-Yau manifolds of the same dimension.

Load-bearing premise

The paper quotes Hodge numbers and Picard-Fuchs orders that hold only for smooth hypersurfaces, but it does not check that the Symanzik hypersurfaces of the graphs shown are free of singular points.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The two-loop vertex graph treated in the paper has $X_U \in P^5[2]$ with $Q_U=3$ and $X_F \in P^5[3]$ with $Q_F=2$, so the maximally cut integral is a period integral of a cubic fourfold with an expected Picard-Fuchs order of three.
  • For the double-pentagon and hexagon-box graphs, the second Symanzik polynomial defines cubic sevenfolds $X_F\in P^8[3]$ with charge $Q=3$, whose middle cohomology has the Hodge numbers quoted in Eq. (29).
  • The three-loop propagator graphs in $\phi^3$ theory give quartic sixfolds $X_F\in P^7[4]$ with charge $Q=2$ and Hodge numbers quoted in Eq. (31).
  • Iterated Mercedes-Benz graphs form an infinite sequence of special Fano varieties of charge $Q=2$ in configurations $P^{7+6n}[4+3n]$, and attaching one-loop boxes produces a doubly infinite family satisfying $n_{\mathrm{poly}}-Q(\ell+1)+3\ell-1=0$.
  • Because the Hodge width, not the dimension, controls monodromy nilpotence, period solutions for these Feynman integrals will have fewer logarithmic terms than Calabi-Yau geometries of the same dimension.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not write down the Picard-Fuchs operator for any of its examples, so the most direct next step would be to derive the order-three operator for the maximally cut two-loop vertex integral and test it numerically against high-precision evaluation of the period integral $\int_T \sigma/F^2$.
  • If the K3-type motive is real, the differential equation's solutions should carry the same modular form as the K3 fiber, a property that could be checked by expanding the period around a large-volume or conifold point without needing new physics input.
  • The charge $Q$ suggests a taxonomy of Feynman geometries by the pair (dimension, charge), with Calabi-Yau as $Q=1$; graphs with different loop numbers but the same $Q$ might share period equations, which would be a new organizing principle for amplitude computations.
  • The gravitational scattering integrals that the paper mentions could be re-examined for special Fano structure in the same way, since the same Symanzik-polynomial criterion applies; this would be an extension beyond what the paper establishes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that Symanzik polynomials of certain Feynman graphs should be read as defining hypersurfaces of special Fano type rather than merely Calabi-Yau type. It recalls the special Fano quantization condition for weighted projective hypersurfaces, Qd = sum of weights, and applies it to the graph-polynomial configurations X_U ∈ P^{n_int-1}[ℓ] and X_F ∈ P^{n_int-1}[ℓ+1], so that the charges Q_U and Q_F are fixed by loop number and internal-line count. The central examples are the two-loop vertex graph (Q_U=3, Q_F=2), the double-pentagon graph (Q_F=3), and three-loop Mercedes-Benz graphs (Q_F=2), together with several claimed infinite families. For these examples the paper quotes Hodge numbers of generic smooth hypersurfaces, states that the two-loop vertex cubic fourfold gives a K3-type motive, and interprets maximally cut integrals as period integrals of the corresponding special Fano varieties.

Significance. The arithmetic identification of the charges is simple, explicit, and parameter-free, which is a genuine strength: the charge Q is not fitted but follows from n_int = Qℓ or n_int = Q(ℓ+1). If the geometric conclusions are valid for the actual Symanzik hypersurfaces, the paper broadens the established Calabi-Yau story of Feynman integrals to a larger class of Fano-type varieties whose middle cohomology is controlled by the charge Q, and it supplies concrete, checkable examples across standard-model-like graphs. The paper is less convincing where it moves from the generic configuration to the particular graph hypersurface: smoothness and genericity are assumed rather than proved, and one of the key exponent formulas is garbled. These are load-bearing issues, but they are local and fixable.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eqs. (24)–(31)] The Hodge numbers, Picard-Fuchs orders, and K3-type conclusions are stated for smooth (or generic) hypersurfaces, but the paper never establishes that the actual Symanzik hypersurfaces for the graphs in Figs. 1–5 are smooth or quasi-smooth. This matters because §2 itself warns that "for singular varieties the motive changes its rank." For the two-loop vertex graph, X_U is the determinant of a 2×2 symmetric matrix of linear forms; such a quadric in P^5 has rank at most 3 and is singular along a P^2, so it is not a smooth quadric fourfold. For X_F, the second Symanzik polynomial defines a special cubic fourfold rather than a generic element of P^5[3], and no argument is given that the physical region of masses and external invariants avoids the discriminant locus. Please either prove quasi-smoothness for the examples or state explicitly that the quoted Hodge-theoretic results apply only to smooth members of the family and explain how the singularity of X_U affects the special Fano interpretation.
  2. [§3, Eq. (22)] The formula for pow_F is garbled and arithmetically inconsistent with the example that follows it. Inserting D=4, Q_U=3, Q_F=2 into the printed expression gives (1/2)·3 − 4(2·3·2 − 4^2/2) = 1.5 − 16 = −14.5, not pow_F = Q_F = 2. Moreover, the text's statement that in four dimensions the exponent reduces to Q_F is not true in general: imposing pow_U = 0 and pow_F = Q_F in D=4 forces Q_F = 2 and ℓ = 2 (with Q_U = 3), rather than holding for all special Fano graphs. Please rewrite the derivation starting from Eq. (16) and state the precise conditions under which pow_F = Q_F.
  3. [§4, "the motive ... is of K3 type"] The claim that the two-loop vertex graph yields a K3-type motive rests on identifying H^4(X_F) with the Hodge diamond of a generic smooth cubic fourfold. Even accepting smoothness, "motive of K3 type" is stronger than what the displayed Hodge numbers alone prove; the paper should either cite the relevant Hodge-theoretic or motivic statement for cubic fourfolds and verify it for the Feynman family, or weaken the wording to "Hodge structure of K3 type." As written, the step from the generic configuration to the actual Symanzik hypersurface is a gap in the central geometric claim.
  4. [§4, Eq. (32)] The quantization condition for the doubly infinite family is introduced without derivation, and as printed it is inconsistent with the hexagon-box example quoted immediately afterward. Taking the hexagon as the one-loop n-point graph, n_poly = 5, ℓ = 2, Q = 3, the left-hand side of Eq. (32) is 5 − 9 + 6 − 1 = 1, not 0. Please correct the formula or clarify the definitions of n_poly and the precise iteration step that leads to Eq. (32).
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (17)–(18)] The symbol Q is overloaded: it denotes both the special Fano charge and the vector of linear terms Q_j in the expansion of the Symanzik denominator. This makes Eq. (22) harder to parse; please use a different symbol such as L_j for the linear terms.
  2. [§4] The phrase "ordinary project space" should read "ordinary projective space."
  3. [§4] The introduction to Section 4 says that the first graph in Fig. 1 will be shown to be part of an infinite sequence, but the later Mercedes-Benz sequence starts from the three-loop graph in Fig. 3; the promised link to the first graph in Fig. 1 is not actually made.
  4. [References] Reference [24] lists the arXiv identifier as 2108.0530, which appears truncated; please check the complete identifier. Reference [64] lists the same arXiv identifier as [63], which may be a typo.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Feynman-to-special-Fano identification follows from graph combinatorics (ℓ,n_int) via the restated quantization condition, and the Hodge/Picard-Fuchs facts quoted are external results about generic smooth hypersurfaces.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is: define special Fano varieties by the quantization condition c1(X)=(Q−1)dh, equivalently Σ w_i=Qd (Section 2, eqs. (1)–(2)); use the standard Symanzik degrees deg U=ℓ and deg F=ℓ+1 (Section 3, eq. (19)) to place X_U and X_F in P^{n_int−1}[ℓ] and P^{n_int−1}[ℓ+1] (eq. (20)); and then read off Q from the condition Qℓ=n_int or Q(ℓ+1)=n_int. For the two-loop vertex graph, (ℓ,n_int)=(2,6) gives Q_U=3 and Q_F=2; the exponents pow_U=0 and pow_F=Q_F in D=4 follow from ν_a=1, not from any fit (Section 4). The Hodge diamonds and Picard-Fuchs orders in eqs. (24)–(31) are quoted for generic elements of the ambient configuration (e.g. P^5[3], P^8[3], P^7[4]), and the cubic-fourfold/K3 relation is standard mathematics, independently documented in ref. [94]. No parameter is fitted and no prediction is an input by construction. The paper does rely on the author's earlier special Fano framework ([57,58,59,61]), but the defining quantization condition and Hodge decomposition are restated in the paper, and the Feynman identification is a new combinatorial matching problem; the self-citations are not the load-bearing support. The main weakness is instead an omitted support check: Section 2 warns that 'for singular varieties the motive changes its rank,' while Section 4 applies smooth generic Hodge numbers to graph-defined hypersurfaces without proving smoothness or avoiding the discriminant locus. That is a correctness/genericity gap, not a circular reduction; no step can be exhibited in which a quoted output is identical by construction to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities: the charge Q is fixed by the graph data through the quantization condition. The main assumptions are the standard Symanzik parametrization, the unverified smoothness of the graph hypersurfaces, and the asserted period interpretation of the maximal cut.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Symanzik parametric representation of Feynman integrals (eq. 16) and the identification of the hypersurfaces X_U and X_F from the Symanzik polynomials (eq. 20).
    Section 3. The entire analysis builds on this standard representation; it is a modeling assumption that the geometric object associated to the parametric integral is captured by these hypersurfaces.
  • domain assumption The Hodge numbers quoted for P^5[3], P^8[3], and P^7[4] are those of smooth generic hypersurfaces, and the physical graph hypersurfaces can be treated as smooth members.
    Section 4, eqs. (24)-(31). The paper quotes Hodge numbers without checking the singular locus of the Symanzik polynomials. This is load-bearing because singularity changes the mixed Hodge structure and the Picard-Fuchs order.
  • domain assumption The maximally cut integral over the torus T in eq. (23) computes a period of the special Fano variety.
    Section 3. The paper asserts this correspondence without a homology or contour argument; it is a standard expectation in the maximal-cut literature but not proven here.
  • standard math Standard results in Hodge theory, including Griffiths residue calculus, Lefschetz theorems, Kodaira-Nakano vanishing, and Katz's monodromy theorem.
    Section 2. These external results are used without derivation; they are standard background in the field.
  • standard math The definition and Hodge structure of special Fano varieties from refs. [57,58,59,61], including the quantization condition c1(X) = (Q-1)d h and the Hodge decomposition (3).
    The paper relies on prior published work for the properties of special Fano varieties; these are established results with stated assumptions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TIM4T63W

@misc{pith2026241220236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Special Fano geometry from Feynman integrals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TIM4T63W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20236}
}
abstract

One of the fundamental open questions in QFT is what kind of functions appear as Feynman integrals. In recent years this question has often been considered in a geometric context by interpreting the polynomials that appear in these integrals as defining algebraic varieties. One focal point of the past decade has in particular been the class of Calabi-Yau varieties that arise in some types of Feynman integrals. A class of manifolds that includes CYs as a special case are varieties of special Fano types. These varieties were originally introduced because the class of CY spaces is not closed under mirror symmetry. Their Hodge structure is of a more general type and the middle cohomology in particular is determined by two integers, the dimension of the manifold and a charge $Q$. In the present paper this class of manifolds is considered in the context of Feynman integrals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20236 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Nakanishi, Graph polynomials and Feynman integrals , Gordon and Breach, 1971

    N. Nakanishi, Graph polynomials and Feynman integrals , Gordon and Breach, 1971

    1971

  2. [4]

    Itzykson and J.-B

    C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum field theory , 1980

    1980

  3. [1]

    Eden, P.V

    R.E. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix , CUP 1966

    1966

  4. [2]

    Hwa and V.L

    R.C. Hwa and V.L. Teplitz, Homology and Feynman integrals , Benjamin, 1966

    1966

  5. [5]

    Bloch, H

    S. Bloch, H. Esnault and D. Kreimer, On motives associated to graphs , Commun. Math. Phys. 267 (2006) 181, arXiv: math.AG/0510011

    work page arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Feynman motives of banana graphs

    P. Aluffi and M. Marcolli, Feynman motives of banana graphs , Comm. Number Theory Phys. 3 (2009) 1, arXiv: 0807.1690 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    Bananas: multi-edge graphs and their Feynman integrals

    D. Kreimer, Bananas: multi-edge graphs and their Feynman integrals , Lett. Math. Phys. 113 (2023) 38, arXiv: 2202.05490 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Brown, On the periods of some Feynman integrals , arXiv: 0910.0114 [math.AG] 16

    F.C.S. Brown, On the periods of some Feynman integrals , arXiv: 0910.0114 [math.AG] 16

    arXiv

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    Schnetz, A K3 in φ4, Duke Math

    F.C.S Brown and O. Schnetz, A K3 in φ4, Duke Math. J. 161 (2012) 1817, arXiv: 1006.4064 [math.AG]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M¨ uller-Stach, S

    S. M¨ uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl and R. Zayadeh, A second-order differential equation for the two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses , Comm. Num. Theor. Phys. 6 (2012) 203, arXiv: 1112.4360

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    M¨ uller-Stach, S

    S. M¨ uller-Stach, S. Weinzierl and R. Zayadeh, Picard-Fuchs equations for Feynman integrals, Comm. Math. Phys. 326 (2014) 237, arXiv: 1212.4389 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bloch and P

    S. Bloch and P. Vanhove, The elliptic dilogarithm for the sunset graph , J. Number Theory 148 (2015) 328, arXiv 1309.5865 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bloch, M

    S. Bloch, M. Kerr and P. Vanhove, A Feynman integral via higher normal functions , Compos. Math. 151 (2015) 2329 − 2375, arXiv: 1406.2664 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Bloch, M

    S. Bloch, M. Kerr and P. Vanhove, Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2016) 6, arXiv: 1601.08181

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Bourjaily, Y.-H

    J.L. Bourjaily, Y.-H. He, A.J. Mcleod, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm, Traintracks through CYs: amplitudes beyond elliptic polylogarithms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 071603, arXiv: 1805.09326 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Festi and D

    D. Festi and D. van Straten, Bhabba scattering and a special pencil of K3 surfaces , Commun. Num. Theory Phys. 13 (2019) 463, arXiv: 1809.04970 [math.AG]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bourjaily, A.J

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. Mcleod, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm, Bounded collec- tion of Feynman integral CY geometries , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 031601, arXiv: 1810.07689 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Besier, D

    M. Besier, D. Festi, M. Harrison and B. Naskrecki, Arithmetic and geometry of a K3 surface emerging from virtual corrections to Drell-Yan sca ttering, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 14 (2020) 863, arXiv: 1908.01079 [math.AG]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Bourjaily, A.J

    J.L. Bourjaily, A.J. McLeod, C. Vergu, M. Volk, M. von Hippel and M. Wilhelm, Em- bedding Feynman integral (CY) geometries in weighted proje ctive space, JHEP 01 (2019) 078, arXiv: 1910.1534 [hep-th]

    2019

  12. [20]

    Klemm, C

    A. Klemm, C. Nega and R. Safari, The ℓ-loop banana amplitude from GKZ systems and relative CY periods , JHEP 04 (2020) 088, arXiv: 1912.06201 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Vergu and M

    C. Vergu and M. Volk, Traintrack Calabi-Yaus from twistor geometry , JHEP 07 (2020) 160, arXiv: 2005.08771[hep-th] 17

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    B¨ onisch, F

    K. B¨ onisch, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm, C. Nega and R. Safari, Analytic structure of all loop banana amplitudes , JHEP 05 (2021) 066, arXiv: 2008.10574

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Frellesvig, C

    H. Frellesvig, C. Vergu, M. Volk and M. von Hippel, Cuts and isogenies , JHEP 05 (2021) 064, arXiv: 2102.02769 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    B¨ onisch, C

    K. B¨ onisch, C. Duhr, F. Fischbach, A. Klemm and C. Nega, Feynman integrals in dimensional regularization and extensions of CY motives , JHEP 09 (2022) 156, arXiv: 2108.0530 [hep-th]

    2022

  17. [25]

    Forum and M

    A. Forum and M. von Hippel, A symbol and coaction for higher-loop sunrise integrals , SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 050, arXiv: 2209.03922 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [26]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Porkert, Yangian-invariant fishnet integrals in two dimensions as volumes of Calabi-Yau variet ies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 041602, arXiv: 2209.05291 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P¨ ogel, X

    S. P¨ ogel, X. Wang, and S. Weinzierl, Taming Calabi-Yau Feynman integrals: the four-loop equal mass banana integral , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 101601, arXiv: 2211.04292 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dlapa, J.M

    C. Dlapa, J.M. Henn and F.J. Wagner, An algorithmic approach to finding canonical differential equations for elliptic Feynman integrals , arXiv: 2211.16357 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    P¨ ogel, X

    S. P¨ ogel, X. Wang, and S. Weinzierl, Bananas of equal mass: any loop, any order in the dimensional regularization parameter , JHEP 04 (2023) 117, arXiv: 2212.08908 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, C. Nega and L. Tancredi, The ice cone family and iterated integrals for Calabi-Yau varieties , JHEP 02 (2023) 228, arXiv: 2212.09550

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Q. Cao, S. He and Y. Tang, Cutting the traintracks: Cauchy, Schubert and Calabi-Yau , JHEP 04 (2023) 072, arXiv: 2301.07834

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Doran, A

    C.F. Doran, A. Harder and P. Vanhove, Motivic geometry of two-loop Feynman integrals, with an appendix by E. Pichon-Pharabod, arXiv: 2302.14840 [math.AG]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    G¨ orges, C

    L. G¨ orges, C. Nega, L. Tancredi and F.J. Wagner, On a procedure to derive ǫ-factorized differential equations beyond polylogarithms , arXiv: 2305.14090 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    McLeod and M

    A.J. McLeod and M. von Hippel, Traintracks all the way down , arXiv: 2306.11780 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Polkert, The Basso-Dixon formula and Calabi-Yau geometry , JHEP 03 (2024) 177, arXiv: 2310.08625 18

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mishnyakov, A

    V. Mishnyakov, A. Morozov and M. Reva, On factorization hierarchy of equations for banana Feynman amplitudes , Nucl. Phys. B1010 (2025) 116746, arXiv: 2311.13524

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    C. Duhr, A. Klemm, F. Loebbert, C. Nega and F. Polkert, Geometry from integrability: multi-leg fishnet integrals in two dimensio ns, JHEP 07 (2024) 008, arXiv: 2402.19034 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mishnyakov, A

    V. Mishnyakov, A. Morozov, M. Reva and P. Suprum, From equations in coordinate space to Picard-Fuchs and back , arXiv: 2404.03069 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Jockers, S

    H. Jockers, S. Kotlewski, P. Kuusela, A.J. McLeod, S. P¨ ogel, M . Sarve, X. Wang and S. Weinzierl, A Calabi-Yau-to-curve correspondence for Feynman integra ls, arXiv: 2404.05785 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    C. Duhr, F. Gasparotto, C. Nega, L. Tancredi, and S. Weinzier l, On the 3-loop self- energy to three loops in QED , arXiv: 2408.05154 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Forner, C

    F. Forner, C. Nega and L. Tancredi, On the photon self-energy to three loops in QED , arXiv: 2411.19042 [hep-th]

  34. [42]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm, Calabi-Yau meets gravity: A CY threefold at 5th post-Minkowskian order , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 20, arXiv: 2312.11371 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Klemm, C

    A. Klemm, C. Nega, B. Sauer and J. Plefka, CY in sky , Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 124046, arXiv: 2401.07899 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales and M. Wilhelm, Classifying post-Minkowskian geometries for gravitational waves via loop-by-loop Baikov , arXiv: 2405.17255 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Driesse, G.U

    M. Driesse, G.U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefk a, B. Sauer and J. Usovitch, High-precision black hole scattering with Calabi-Yau mani folds, arXiv 2411.11846 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Frellesvig, R

    H. Frellesvig, R. Morales, S. P¨ ogel, S. Weinzierl and M. Wilhelm, Calabi- Yau Feynman integrals in gravity: ǫ-factorized form for apparent singularities , arXiv: 2412.12057 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [47]

    Candelas, G

    P. Candelas, G. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Vacuum configurations for superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B258 (1985) 46

    1985

  40. [48]

    Candelas, M

    P. Candelas, M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, Calabi-Yau manifolds in weighted P4, Nucl. Phys. B341 (1990) 383 19

    1990

  41. [49]

    Lynker and R

    M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, Landau-Ginzburg theories as orbifolds , Phys. Lett. B249 (1990) 237

    1990

  42. [50]

    Greene and R

    B.R. Greene and R. Plesser, Duality in Calabi-Yau moduli space , Nucl. Phys. B338 (1990) 15

    1990

  43. [51]

    Gepner, Spacetime supersymmetry in compactified string theory and s uperconfomal models, Nucl

    D. Gepner, Spacetime supersymmetry in compactified string theory and s uperconfomal models, Nucl. Phys. 296 (1988) 757

    1988

  44. [52]

    Martinec, Algebraic geometry and effective Lagrangians , Phys

    E. Martinec, Algebraic geometry and effective Lagrangians , Phys. Lett. B217 (1989) 431

    1989

  45. [53]

    Vafa and N.P

    C. Vafa and N.P. Warner, Catastrophes and the classification of conformal theories , Phys. Lett. 218 (1989) 151

    1989

  46. [54]

    Lerche, C

    W. Lerche, C. Vafa and N.P. Warner, Chiral rings in N = 2 superconformal theories, Nucl. Phys. B324 (1989) 427

    1989

  47. [55]

    Klemm and R

    A. Klemm and R. Schimmrigk, Landau-Ginzburg string vacua, Nucl. Phys. B411 (1994) 559, arXiv: hep-th/9204060

    1994 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Kreuzer and H

    M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, No mirror symmetry in Landau-Ginzburg spectra! , Nucl. Phys. B88 (1992) 113, arXiv: hep-th/9205004

    1992 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Schimmrigk, Critical superstring vacua from noncritical manifolds: a n ovel frame- work for string compactification and mirror symmetry , Phys

    R. Schimmrigk, Critical superstring vacua from noncritical manifolds: a n ovel frame- work for string compactification and mirror symmetry , Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3688 − 3691, arXiv: hep-th/9210062

    1993 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Schimmrigk, Mirror symmetry and string vacua from a special class of Fano varieties, Int

    R. Schimmrigk, Mirror symmetry and string vacua from a special class of Fano varieties, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11 (1996) 3049, arXiv: hep-th/9405086

    1996 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Candelas, E

    P. Candelas, E. Derrick and L. Parkes, Generalized Calabi-Yau manifolds and the mirror of a rigid manifolds , Nucl. Phys. B407 (1993) 115, arXiv: hep-th/9304045

    1993 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Batyrev and L.A

    V.V. Batyrev and L.A. Borisov, Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi- Yau manifolds , in Mirror Symmetry II, AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math, p. 71 − 86, arXiv: alg-geom/9402002

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Kharel, M

    S. Kharel, M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, String modular motives of mirrors of rigid Calabi-Yau varieties, Fields Inst. Commun. 54 (2008) 47, arXiv: 0908.1256 [math.AG]

    2008 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Iliev and L

    A. Iliev and L. Manivel, On cubic hypersurfaces of dimension seven and eight , Proc. London Math. Soc. 108 (2014) 517 − 540, arXiv: 1102.3618 [math.AG] 20

    2014 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Favero, A

    D. Favero, A. Iliev and L. Katzarkov, On the Griffihs groups of Fano mani- folds of Calabi-Yau Hodge type , Pure and Applied Math. Quart. 10 (2014) 1 − 55, arXiv: 1102.3623 [math.AG]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Lynker and R

    M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, ADE Quantum Calabi-Yau manifolds , Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 121 ; M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, Heterotic string compacti- fication on N = 2 superconformal theories with c = 9, Phys. Lett. B208 (1988) 216

    1990

  57. [66]

    L¨ utken and G.G

    C.A. L¨ utken and G.G. Ross, Taxonomy of heterotic superconformal field theories , Phys. Lett. B213 (1988) 152

    1988

  58. [67]

    Fuchs, A

    J. Fuchs, A. Klemm, C. Scheich and M.G. Schmidt, Spectra and symmetries of Gepner models compared to CY compactifications, Ann. Phys. 204 (1990) 1 ; J. Fuchs, A. Klemm, C. Scheich and M.G. Schmidt, Gepner models with arbitrary affine invariants and the associated CY spaces , Phys...

    1990

  59. [68]

    https://cds.cern.ch/record/237363/files/CM-P00056210.pdf

  60. [69]

    Candelas, A

    P. Candelas, A. Dale, A. L¨ utken and R. Schimmrigk, Complete intersection Calabi-Yau manifolds, Nucl. Phys. 298 (1988) 493

    1988

  61. [70]

    Griffiths, Periods of integrals on algebraic manifolds: Summary of mai n results and discussion of open problems , Bull

    P.A. Griffiths, Periods of integrals on algebraic manifolds: Summary of mai n results and discussion of open problems , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970) 228 − 296

    1970

  62. [71]

    Griffiths and J

    P. Griffiths and J. Harris, Principles of algebraic geometry , Wiley, 1978

    1978

  63. [72]

    Voisin, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry , I, II, CUP, 2002

    C. Voisin, Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry , I, II, CUP, 2002

    2002

  64. [73]

    Carlson, S

    J. Carlson, S. M¨ uller-Stach and C.A.M. Peters, Period mappings and period domains , CUP, 2003

    2003

  65. [74]

    Huybrechts, The geometry of cubic hypersurfaces , CUP, 2023

    D. Huybrechts, The geometry of cubic hypersurfaces , CUP, 2023

    2023

  66. [75]

    Peters and J.H.M

    C.A.M. Peters and J.H.M. Steenbrink, Mixed Hodge structures , Springer 2008

    2008

  67. [76]

    Akizuki and S

    Y. Akizuki and S. Nakano, Note on Kodaira-Spencer proof of Lefschetz theorems , Proc. Japan Acad. 30 (1954) 266

    1954

  68. [77]

    Landman, On the Picard-Lefschetz formula for algebraic manifolds ac quiring general singularities, Berkeley Ph.D

    A. Landman, On the Picard-Lefschetz formula for algebraic manifolds ac quiring general singularities, Berkeley Ph.D. thesis, 1966 21

    1966

  69. [78]

    Landman, On the Picard-Lefschetz transformation for algebraic mani folds acquiring general singularities , Trans

    A. Landman, On the Picard-Lefschetz transformation for algebraic mani folds acquiring general singularities , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 181 (1971) 89

    1971

  70. [79]

    Cox and S

    D.A. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror symmetry and algebraic geometry , AMS 1999

    1999

  71. [80]

    Katz, Nilpotent connections and the monodromy theorem: applicat ions of a theorem of Turrittin, Publ

    N. Katz, Nilpotent connections and the monodromy theorem: applicat ions of a theorem of Turrittin, Publ. Math. IHES 39 (1970) 175

    1970

  72. [81]

    Griffiths, The residue calculus and some transcendental results in alg ebraic geom- etry I, Proc

    P.A. Griffiths, The residue calculus and some transcendental results in alg ebraic geom- etry I, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 55 (1966) 1303,

    1966

  73. [82]

    Kadir, M

    S. Kadir, M. Lynker and R. Schimmrigk, String modular phases in Calabi-Yau families , J. Geom. Phys. 61 (2011) 2453, arXiv: 1012.5807 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Weinzierl, Feynman integrals, Springer Unitext, 2022, arXiv: 2201.03593 [hep-th]

    S. Weinzierl, Feynman integrals, Springer Unitext, 2022, arXiv: 2201.03593 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Primo and L

    A. Primo and L. Tancredi, On the maximal cut of Feynman integrals and the solution of their differential equations , Nucl. Phys. B916 (2017) 94, arXiv: 1610.08397 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Tancredi, Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman inte- grals

    A.Primo and L. Tancredi, Maximal cuts and differential equations for Feynman inte- grals. An application to the three-loop massive banana grap h, Nucl. Phys. B921 (2017) 316, arXiv: 1704.05465 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Vanhove, Feynman integrals, toric geometry and mirror symmetry , in KMPB Con- ference: Elliptic integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modul ar Forms in Quantum Field Theory , pp

    P. Vanhove, Feynman integrals, toric geometry and mirror symmetry , in KMPB Con- ference: Elliptic integrals, Elliptic Functions and Modul ar Forms in Quantum Field Theory , pp. 415 − 458, arXiv: 1807.11466

    arXiv

  78. [87]

    Karplus and N.M

    R. Karplus and N.M. Kroll, Fourth-order corrections in QED and the magnetic moment of the electron , Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 536

    1950

  79. [88]

    Petermann, Fourth order magnetic moment of the electron , Helv

    A. Petermann, Fourth order magnetic moment of the electron , Helv. Phys. Acta 30 (1957) 407

    1957

  80. [89]

    Sommerfield, Magnetic dipole moment of the electron , Phys

    C.M. Sommerfield, Magnetic dipole moment of the electron , Phys. Rev. 107 (1957) 328

    1957

  81. [90]

    Gonsalves, Dimensionally regularized two-loop on-shell quark form fa ctor, Phys

    R.J. Gonsalves, Dimensionally regularized two-loop on-shell quark form fa ctor, Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 1542

    1983

  82. [91]

    van Neerven, Dimensional regularization of mass and infrared singulari ties in two-loop on-shell vertex functions , Nucl

    W.L. van Neerven, Dimensional regularization of mass and infrared singulari ties in two-loop on-shell vertex functions , Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 453

    1986

  83. [92]

    Fleischer, O.V

    J. Fleischer, O.V. Tarasov and V.O Tarasov, Analytical result for the two-loop QCD correction to the decay H→ gγ, Phys. Lett. 584 (2004) 294, arXiv: hep-ph/0401090 22

    2004 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Aglietti, R

    U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi and A. Vicini, Two-loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays , Phys. Lett. B595 (2004) 432, arXiv: hep-ph/0404071

    2004 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Hassett, Special cubic fourfolds , Compos

    B. Hassett, Special cubic fourfolds , Compos. Math. 120 (2000) 1

    2000

  86. [95]

    Barth, C

    W. Barth, C. Peters and A. van de Ven, Compact complex surfaces , Springer 1984

    1984

  87. [96]

    Z. Bern, L. Dixon, D. Kosower, R. Roiban, M. Spradlin, Vergu an d a A. Volovich, The two-loop six-point MHV amplitude in (maximally?) supersym metric YM theory , Phys. Rev. D78 (2008), arXiv: 0803.1465 [hep-ph/th]

    2008 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Kosower, R

    D. Kosower, R. Roiban and C. Vergu, Six-point MHV amplitudes in maximally super- symmetric Yang-Mills theory , Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 065018, arXiv: 1009.1376 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  89. [98]

    J. Henn, T. Peraro, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, A first look at the function space for planar two-loop six-particle Feynman integrals , arXiv: 2112.10605 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  90. [99]

    Z. Bern, L. Dixon and D. Kosower, Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals , Nucl. Phys. B412 (1994) 751 − 816, arXiv: hep-ph/9306240

    1994 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Iwasaki, Quantum theory of gravitation vs

    Y. Iwasaki, Quantum theory of gravitation vs. classical theory − 4th order potential , Prog. Theor. Phys. 46 (1971) 1587

    1971

  92. [101]

    Cheung, I.Z

    C. Cheung, I.Z. Rothstein and M.P. Solon, From scattering amplitudes to classical potentials in the PM expansion , Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 251101, arXiv: 1808.02489 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M.P. Solon and M.Zen g, Black hole binary dynamics from the double copy and effective theory , JHEP 10 (2019) 206, arXiv: 1908.01493

    2019 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M.S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M.P. Solon and M. Zeng, Scattering amplitudes and conservative binary dynamics at O(G4), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 171601, arXiv: 2101.07254 23

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.