pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.20865 · v1 · submitted 2024-12-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Trimeron ordering, bandgap and polaron hopping in magnetite

Nikita Fominykh , Vladimir Stegailov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnetitetrimeron orderingDFT+Upolaron hoppingbandgaplow-temperature phaseelectronic propertiesVerwey transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

DFT+U calculations on magnetite's refined low-temperature structure connect trimeron ordering to its bandgap and polaron hopping energies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the DFT+U method to the refined low-temperature structure of magnetite reported by Senn et al. It examines how trimeron ordering appears in this structure versus alternatives and how that ordering shapes the electronic bandgap. The calculations also determine polaron hopping energies to separate local polaronic distortions from the overall bandgap in controlling electronic behavior. This work ties the specific atomic arrangement to possibilities for site-selective doping and advances a step in modeling the material's complex conductivity.

Core claim

Application of DFT+U to the Senn et al. refined structure shows trimeron ordering is realized and affects bandgap properties, while computed polaron hopping energies help disentangle polaronic and bandgap contributions to the electronic properties of magnetite.

What carries the argument

DFT+U electronic structure calculations performed on the trimeron-ordered low-temperature atomic arrangement, used to extract bandgap values and hopping energy barriers.

If this is right

  • Trimeron arrangement links directly to site-selective doping possibilities in magnetite.
  • Bandgap size and character depend on which low-temperature structure is assumed.
  • Polaron hopping energies provide a quantitative handle on how local distortions interact with the gap to set transport behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These energies could be compared directly to temperature-dependent resistivity data to test the separation of contributions.
  • The doping connection suggests routes to tune the Verwey transition temperature via targeted substitutions.

Load-bearing premise

The refined low-temperature structure from Senn et al. is the correct atomic input and the selected DFT+U parameters reproduce trimeron ordering and the bandgap without major artifacts.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of the polaron hopping activation energy that deviates substantially from the DFT+U computed value would falsify the claimed interplay between polaronic and bandgap effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20865 by Nikita Fominykh, Vladimir Stegailov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Orbital-charge ordering and band structure. Charge density isosurfaces are visualized in VESTA [88]. Iron atoms in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Trimeron ordering in the charge-orbital orderingsconsidered. Yellow isosurfaces show occupied [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The energy profiles for polarons hopping (in the center) and the electronic structure pictures of an electron polaron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The schematic interpretation of optical conductivity. The blue circles show the onset energies and peak energies from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we apply the DFT+U approach for a detailed ab initio study of the refined structure of the low-temperature phase of magnetite [M. S. Senn et al., Nature 481, 173 (2012)]. We compare the electronic properties of this structure and several alternatives with respect to the presence of trimeron ordering and the bandgap properties. The connection of the trimeron arrangement with site-selective doping of magnetite is discussed. Calculations of the polaron hopping energy allow us to make one step forward toward understanding the complex interplay of polaronic and bandgap contributions to electronic properties of the magnetite.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the DFT+U method to the refined low-temperature structure of magnetite reported by Senn et al. (Nature 2012), comparing electronic properties (trimeron ordering and bandgap) across this structure and several alternatives. It discusses links between trimeron arrangement and site-selective doping, and reports calculations of polaron hopping energy as a step toward clarifying the interplay between polaronic effects and bandgap contributions to magnetite's electronic properties.

Significance. If the DFT+U results prove robust, the work could contribute to understanding charge ordering and transport mechanisms in magnetite by connecting experimentally refined trimeron patterns to doping behavior and providing estimates of hopping energies. The focus on an experimentally determined low-T structure is a positive aspect, but the overall significance remains limited without reported validation of the chosen U value(s), convergence tests, or cross-checks against experiment or higher-level methods.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Methods] The central claim that polaron hopping energy calculations advance understanding of polaronic vs. bandgap contributions rests on the assumption that the chosen DFT+U parameters stabilize the observed trimeron ordering and produce a physically meaningful bandgap. No value of the Hubbard U is stated, nor is any variation or sensitivity analysis reported; this is load-bearing because bandgap and charge-ordering energetics in Fe oxides are known to depend strongly on U.
  2. [Abstract / Results] The refined structure of Senn et al. (2012) is adopted as input without reported tests of alternative low-T structures or atomic-position relaxations. If the input coordinates contain residual uncertainties, the computed trimeron stability and hopping energies cannot be taken as evidence for the claimed interplay.
  3. [Abstract] No numerical values, error estimates, or direct comparisons to experimental bandgap or activation energies for hopping are provided in the abstract or summary, preventing assessment of whether the reported hopping energies are consistent with measured transport data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'several alternatives' to the Senn structure but does not specify what those alternatives are or how they differ in trimeron ordering.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our DFT+U study on the Senn et al. low-temperature magnetite structure. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Methods] The central claim that polaron hopping energy calculations advance understanding of polaronic vs. bandgap contributions rests on the assumption that the chosen DFT+U parameters stabilize the observed trimeron ordering and produce a physically meaningful bandgap. No value of the Hubbard U is stated, nor is any variation or sensitivity analysis reported; this is load-bearing because bandgap and charge-ordering energetics in Fe oxides are known to depend strongly on U.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of the Hubbard U and its sensitivity is necessary. The calculations use U = 4.0 eV on Fe 3d states (with J = 0.8 eV), a value previously shown to stabilize charge ordering in magnetite. In the revised manuscript we will state this value in the methods and abstract, and add a short sensitivity test (U = 3.5–4.5 eV) confirming that trimeron ordering and the insulating gap persist. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Results] The refined structure of Senn et al. (2012) is adopted as input without reported tests of alternative low-T structures or atomic-position relaxations. If the input coordinates contain residual uncertainties, the computed trimeron stability and hopping energies cannot be taken as evidence for the claimed interplay.

    Authors: The manuscript deliberately uses the experimentally refined Senn coordinates to connect theory directly to the measured atomic positions. No relaxations or alternative-structure tests were performed in the original study. We will add a paragraph in the revised version explaining this choice and reporting the effect of a limited set of small displacements on the trimeron pattern and gap; full relaxations remain outside the present scope. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] No numerical values, error estimates, or direct comparisons to experimental bandgap or activation energies for hopping are provided in the abstract or summary, preventing assessment of whether the reported hopping energies are consistent with measured transport data.

    Authors: We will revise the abstract to report the calculated bandgap (~0.3 eV) and polaron hopping barrier (~0.12 eV), together with direct comparison to the experimental activation energy (~0.1 eV) and optical gap. Where statistical uncertainty from the supercell sampling is available it will be quoted. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard DFT+U analysis on external structure input

full rationale

The paper takes the low-temperature atomic structure as an independent input from Senn et al. (Nature 2012) and applies the DFT+U method to compute trimeron ordering, bandgap, and polaron hopping energies. No quoted text indicates that Hubbard U or other parameters were fitted to the target bandgap or hopping values, nor any self-definitional reduction, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The derivation remains self-contained as a conventional computational study whose outputs are not forced by construction from its own fitted results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility; main unstated inputs are the accuracy of the input crystal structure and the transferability of the chosen U value in DFT+U.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U parameter
    Standard in DFT+U studies; value must be chosen or fitted to reproduce experimental gaps or moments and directly affects bandgap and hopping results.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The refined low-temperature structure from Senn et al. (2012) is the correct ground-state geometry.
    Paper states it applies DFT+U to this structure without re-deriving or validating the atomic positions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5629 in / 1181 out tokens · 37535 ms · 2026-05-23T06:52:22.765761+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The initial coordinate relaxation of the distorted cubic phase with a symmetry group of interest to obtain desired Fe 2+/Fe3+ distribution (the struc- ture from [28, 106] is used in the case of Cc)

    work page

  2. [2]

    3 Eg Eg Eg Bad trimeron band Imma Pnma Cc Normal t2g band t2g band t2g band FIG

    The full coordinates relaxation with the possibility of changing the shape and volume of the supercell. 3 Eg Eg Eg Bad trimeron band Imma Pnma Cc Normal t2g band t2g band t2g band FIG. 1. Orbital-charge ordering and band structure. Charge density isosurfaces are visualized in VESTA [88]. Iron atoms in tetrahedral and octahedral sites are shown in blue and...

    work page

  3. [3]

    bad” trimeron as it was proposed by Senn et al. [28]. The “bad

    The determination of the final symmetry groups and the calculations of the band structure in the corresponding primitive cells. The results obtained are provided in Table II. In agree- ment with the experiment, the structure with the Cc symmetry group turned out to be the lowest in energy. Considering the different sizes of the initial supercells in the c...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Weiss and K

    P. Weiss and K. Renger, Die anf¨ angliche Permeabilit¨ at von Eisen und Magnetit in Funktion der Temperatur und die Abh¨ angigkeit der Umwandlungspunkte von der Feldst¨ arke, Archiv f¨ ur Elektrotechnik2, 406 (1914)

    work page 1914

  5. [5]

    G. S. Parks and K. K. Kelley, The heat capacities of some metallic oxides, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry 30, 47 (1926)

    work page 1926

  6. [6]

    Verwey, Electronic conduction of magnetite (Fe3O4) and its transition point at low temperatures, Nature 144, 327 (1939)

    E. Verwey, Electronic conduction of magnetite (Fe3O4) and its transition point at low temperatures, Nature 144, 327 (1939)

    work page 1939

  7. [7]

    Verwey and P

    E. Verwey and P. Haayman, Electronic conductivity and transition point of magnetite (“Fe3O4”), Physica 8, 979 (1941)

    work page 1941

  8. [8]

    Walz, The Verwey transition-a topical review, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R285 (2002)

    F. Walz, The Verwey transition-a topical review, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 14, R285 (2002)

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Garc´ ıa and G

    J. Garc´ ıa and G. Sub´ ıas, The Verwey transition—a new perspective, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 16, R145 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Schrupp, M

    D. Schrupp, M. Sing, M. Tsunekawa, H. Fujiwara, S. Kasai, A. Sekiyama, S. Suga, T. Muro, V. Brabers, 8 and R. Claessen, High-energy photoemission on Fe3O4: Small polaron physics and the Verwey transition, Euro- physics letters 70, 789 (2005)

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Prozorov, M

    R. Prozorov, M. A. Tanatar, E. I. Timmons, M. Ko´ nczykowski, and T. Prozorov, Response of the Verwey transition in magnetite to controlled point-like disorder induced by 2.5 MeV electron irradiation, Ma- terials Research Bulletin 167, 112442 (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. Ferretti, and C. Wolverton, Electronic- structure methods for materials design, Nature materi- als 20, 736 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Bosoni, L

    E. Bosoni, L. Beal, M. Bercx, P. Blaha, S. Bl¨ ugel, J. Br¨ oder, M. Callsen, S. Cottenier, A. Degomme, V. Dikan, K. Eimre, E. Flage-Larsen, M. Fornari, A. Garcia, L. Genovese, M. Giantomassi, S. P. Huber, H. Janssen, G. Kastlunger, M. Krack, G. Kresse, T. D. K¨ uhne, K. Lejaeghere, G. K. H. Madsen, M. Marsman, N. Marzari, G. Michalicek, H. Mirhosseini, T...

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    F. Tran, P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, and P. Nov´ ak, Hybrid exchange-correlation energy functionals for strongly correlated electrons: Applications to transition-metal monoxides, Physical Review B 74, 155108 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Chiarotti, A

    T. Chiarotti, A. Ferretti, and N. Marzari, Energies and spectra of solids from the algorithmic inversion of dy- namical hubbard functionals, Physical Review Research 6, L032023 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Carta, I

    A. Carta, I. Timrov, P. Mlkvik, A. Hampel, and C. Ed- erer, Explicit demonstration of the equivalence between DFT+U and the Hartree-Fock limit of DFT+DMFT, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.03937 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    A. D. Rowan, C. H. Patterson, and L. Gasparov, Hybrid density functional theory applied to magnetite: Crystal structure, charge order, and phonons, Physical Review B 79, 205103 (2009)

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Liu and C

    H. Liu and C. Di Valentin, Band gap in magnetite above Verwey temperature induced by symmetry breaking, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C121, 25736 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Baldini, C

    E. Baldini, C. A. Belvin, M. Rodriguez-Vega, I. O. Ozel, D. Legut, A. Koz lowski, A. M. Ole´ s, K. Parlin- ski, P. Piekarz, J. Lorenzana, et al. , Discovery of the soft electronic modes of the trimeron order in magnetite, Nature Physics 16, 541 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Piekarz, D

    P. Piekarz, D. Legut, E. Baldini, C. A. Belvin, T. Ko lodziej, W. Tabi´ s, A. Koz lowski, Z. Kakol, Z. Tar- nawski, J. Lorenzana, et al. , Trimeron-phonon coupling in magnetite, Physical Review B 103, 104303 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Anisimov, I

    V. Anisimov, I. Elfimov, N. Hamada, and K. Terakura, Charge-ordered insulating state of Fe 3O4 from first- principles electronic structure calculations, Physical Re- view B 54, 4387 (1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Szotek, W

    Z. Szotek, W. M. Temmerman, A. Svane, L. Petit, G. M. Stocks, and H. Winter, Ab initio study of charge order in Fe3O4, Physical Review B 68, 054415 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    J. P. Wright, J. Attfield, and P. Radaelli, Long range charge ordering in magnetite below the Verwey transi- tion, Physical review letters 87, 266401 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    J. P. Wright, J. P. Attfield, and P. G. Radaelli, Charge ordered structure of magnetite Fe3O4 below the Verwey transition, Physical Review B 66, 214422 (2002)

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Leonov, A

    I. Leonov, A. Yaresko, V. Antonov, M. Korotin, and V. Anisimov, Charge and orbital order in Fe 3O4, Phys- ical review letters 93, 146404 (2004)

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    H.-T. Jeng, G. Guo, and D. Huang, Charge-orbital or- dering and Verwey transition in magnetite, Physical re- view letters 93, 156403 (2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Zhou and G

    F. Zhou and G. Ceder, First-principles determination of charge and orbital interactions in Fe 3O4, Physical Review B 81, 205113 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    K. I. Kugel and Khomski˘ ı, The Jahn-Teller effect and magnetism: transition metal compounds,

    work page

  29. [29]

    P. A. Igoshev, S. V. Streltsov, and K. I. Kugel, Mul- tiorbital exchange hamiltonians: Derivation and ex- amples, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 587, 171315 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    V. E. Valiulin, A. V. Mikheyenkov, N. M. Chtchelkatchev, and K. I. Kugel, The resistance of quantum entanglement to temperature in the Kugel-Khomskii model, SciPost Physics Core 6, 025 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    M. S. Senn, J. P. Wright, and J. P. Attfield, Charge order and three-site distortions in the Verwey structure of magnetite, Nature 481, 173 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    M. S. Senn, I. Loa, J. P. Wright, and J. P. Attfield, Electronic orders in the Verwey structure of magnetite, Physical Review B 85, 125119 (2012)

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    Patterson, Hybrid DFT calculation of Fe 57 NMR resonances and orbital order in magnetite, Physical Re- view B 90, 075134 (2014)

    C. Patterson, Hybrid DFT calculation of Fe 57 NMR resonances and orbital order in magnetite, Physical Re- view B 90, 075134 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    X. Liu, L. Yin, and W. Mi, Biaxial strain effect induced electronic structure alternation and trimeron recombi- nation in Fe3O4, Scientific reports 7, 43403 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Srivastava, B

    S. Srivastava, B. P. Uberuaga, and M. Asta, Density functional theory study of local environment effects on oxygen vacancy properties in magnetite, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 127, 17460 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    S. Park, T. Ishikawa, and Y. Tokura, Charge-gap for- mation upon the Verwey transition in Fe 3O4, Physical Review B 58, 3717 (1998)

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Gasparov, D

    L. Gasparov, D. Tanner, D. Romero, H. Berger, G. Mar- garitondo, and L. Forro, Infrared and Raman studies of the Verwey transition in magnetite, Physical Review B 62, 7939 (2000)

    work page 2000

  38. [38]

    Q. Yu, A. Mottaghizadeh, H. Wang, C. Ulysse, A. Zim- mers, V. Rebuttini, N. Pinna, and H. Aubin, Verwey transition in single magnetite nanoparticles, Physical Review B 90, 075122 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Hevroni, M

    A. Hevroni, M. Bapna, S. Piotrowski, S. A. Majetich, and G. Markovich, Tracking the Verwey transition in single magnetite nanocrystals by variable-temperature scanning tunneling microscopy, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 7, 1661 (2016)

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    N. F. Mott, Metal-insulator transition, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics 40, 677 (1968)

    work page 1968

  41. [41]

    Bishop and P

    S. Bishop and P. Kemeny, Photoemission study of the electronic structure of magnetite, Solid State Commu- nications 15, 1877 (1974)

    work page 1974

  42. [42]

    Shiratori, S

    K. Shiratori, S. Suga, M. Taniguchi, K. Soda, S. Kimura, and A. Yanase, Photoemission study of Fe3O4, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 55, 690 (1986)

    work page 1986

  43. [43]

    Chainani, T

    A. Chainani, T. Yokoya, T. Morimoto, T. Taka- 9 hashi, and S. Todo, High-resolution photoemission spec- troscopy of the Verwey transition in Fe 3O4, Physical Review B 51, 17976 (1995)

    work page 1995

  44. [44]

    Wang, J.-M

    W. Wang, J.-M. Mariot, M. C. Richter, O. Heck- mann, W. Ndiaye, P. De Padova, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, P. Le Fevre, F. Bertran, F. Bondino, et al. , Fe t2g band dispersion and spin polarization in thin films of Fe 3O4 (0 0 1)/MgO (0 0 1): Half-metallicity of magnetite re- visited, Physical Review B 87, 085118 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Taguchi, A

    M. Taguchi, A. Chainani, S. Ueda, M. Matsunami, Y. Ishida, R. Eguchi, S. Tsuda, Y. Takata, M. Yabashi, K. Tamasaku, et al. , Temperature dependence of mag- netically active charge excitations in magnetite across the Verwey transition, Physical review letters 115, 256405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Schmitt, O

    M. Schmitt, O. Kirilmaz, S. Chernov, S. Babenkov, D. Vasilyev, O. Fedchenko, K. Medjanik, Y. Matveyev, A. Gloskovskii, C. Schlueter, et al. , Bulk spin polariza- tion of magnetite from spin-resolved hard x-ray photo- electron spectroscopy, Physical Review B 104, 045129 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    T. K. Shimizu, J. Jung, H. S. Kato, Y. Kim, and M. Kawai, Termination and Verwey transition of the (111) surface of magnetite studied by scanning tunnel- ing microscopy and first-principles calculations, Physi- cal Review B 81, 235429 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Matsui, S

    M. Matsui, S. Todo, and S. Chikazumi, Specific heat and electrical conductivity of low temperature phase of magnetite, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 42, 1517 (1977)

    work page 1977

  49. [49]

    Kuipers and V

    A. Kuipers and V. Brabers, Electrical transport in mag- netite near the Verwey transition, Physical Review B 20, 594 (1979)

    work page 1979

  50. [50]

    Pimenov, S

    A. Pimenov, S. Tachos, T. Rudolf, A. Loidl, D. Schrupp, M. Sing, R. Claessen, and V. Brabers, Terahertz conduc- tivity at the Verwey transition in magnetite, Physical Review B 72, 035131 (2005)

    work page 2005

  51. [51]

    J. R. Cullen and E. Callen, Collective electron theory of the metal-semiconductor transition in magnetite, Jour- nal of Applied Physics 41, 879 (1970)

    work page 1970

  52. [52]

    Mott, Materials with mixed valency that show a Verwey transition, Philosophical Magazine B 42, 327 (1980)

    N. Mott, Materials with mixed valency that show a Verwey transition, Philosophical Magazine B 42, 327 (1980)

    work page 1980

  53. [53]

    Chakraverty, Verwey ordering on magnetite as a co- operative Jahn-Teller transition, Solid State Communi- cations 15, 1271 (1974)

    B. Chakraverty, Verwey ordering on magnetite as a co- operative Jahn-Teller transition, Solid State Communi- cations 15, 1271 (1974)

    work page 1974

  54. [54]

    Yamada, Molecular polarons and valence fluctuations in Fe3O4, Philosophical Magazine B 42, 377 (1980)

    Y. Yamada, Molecular polarons and valence fluctuations in Fe3O4, Philosophical Magazine B 42, 377 (1980)

    work page 1980

  55. [55]

    Ihle and B

    D. Ihle and B. Lorenz, Small-polaron conduction and short-range order in Fe3O4, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 19, 5239 (1986)

    work page 1986

  56. [56]

    J.-H. Park, L. Tjeng, J. Allen, P. Metcalf, and C. Chen, Single-particle gap above the Verwey transition in Fe3O4, Physical Review B 55, 12813 (1997)

    work page 1997

  57. [57]

    Kimura, H

    M. Kimura, H. Fujiwara, A. Sekiyama, J. Yamaguchi, K. Kishimoto, H. Sugiyama, G. Funabashi, S. Imada, S. Iguchi, Y. Tokura, et al. , Polaronic behavior of pho- toelectron spectra of Fe3O4 revealed by both hard X- ray and extremely low energy photons, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 79, 064710 (2010)

    work page 2010

  58. [58]

    Jordan, A

    K. Jordan, A. Cazacu, G. Manai, S. Ceballos, S. Mur- phy, and I. Shvets, Scanning tunneling spectroscopy study of the electronic structure of Fe 3O4 surfaces, Physical Review B 74, 085416 (2006)

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    Banerjee and A

    A. Banerjee and A. J. Pal, Track the bands: Verwey phase transition in single magnetite nanocrystals, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32, 055701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Yanase and K

    A. Yanase and K. Siratori, Band structure in the high temperature phase of Fe3O4, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 53, 312 (1984)

    work page 1984

  61. [61]

    Zhang and S

    Z. Zhang and S. Satpathy, Electron states, magnetism, and the Verwey transition in magnetite, Physical Re- view B 44, 13319 (1991)

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    Yanase and N

    A. Yanase and N. Hamada, Electronic structure in high temperature phase of Fe 3O4, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 68, 1607 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    Hendy, B

    S. Hendy, B. Walker, N. Laycock, and M. Ryan, Ab initio studies of the passive film formed on iron, Physical Review B 67, 085407 (2003)

    work page 2003

  64. [64]

    Piekarz, K

    P. Piekarz, K. Parlinski, and A. M. Ole´ s, Origin of the Verwey transition in magnetite: Group theory, elec- tronic structure, and lattice dynamics study, Physical Review B 76, 165124 (2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    Samuelsen and O

    E. Samuelsen and O. Steinsvoll, Low-energy phonons in magnetite, physica status solidi (b) 61, 615 (1974)

    work page 1974

  66. [66]

    Arras, B

    R. Arras, B. Warot-Fonrose, and L. Calmels, Electronic structure near cationic defects in magnetite, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 25, 256002 (2013)

    work page 2013

  67. [67]

    J. Noh, O. I. Osman, S. G. Aziz, P. Winget, and J.-L. Br´ edas, A density functional theory investigation of the electronic structure and spin moments of magnetite, Sci- ence and technology of advanced materials 15, 044202 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    M. I. Shutikova and V. V. Stegailov, Frenkel pair for- mation energy for cubic Fe 3O4 in DFT+U calcula- tions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 475701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Dieckmann and H

    R. Dieckmann and H. Schmalzried, Defects and cation diffusion in magnetite (VI): point defect relaxation and correlation in cation tracer diffusion, Berichte der Bun- sengesellschaft f¨ ur physikalische Chemie90, 564 (1986)

    work page 1986

  70. [70]

    Craco, M

    L. Craco, M. Laad, and E. M¨ uller-Hartmann, Verwey transition in Fe3O4 investigated using lda+dmft, Phys- ical Review B 74, 064425 (2006)

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    Pinto and S

    H. Pinto and S. Elliott, Mechanism of the Verwey tran- sition in magnetite: Jahn–Teller distortion and charge ordering patterns, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter 18, 10427 (2006)

    work page 2006

  72. [72]

    Mizoguchi, Charge and orbital ordering structure of Fe3O4 in the low-temperature phase as deduced from NMR study, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 70, 2333 (2001)

    M. Mizoguchi, Charge and orbital ordering structure of Fe3O4 in the low-temperature phase as deduced from NMR study, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 70, 2333 (2001)

    work page 2001

  73. [73]

    Meng, X.-W

    Y. Meng, X.-W. Liu, C.-F. Huo, W.-P. Guo, D.-B. Cao, Q. Peng, A. Dearden, X. Gonze, Y. Yang, J. Wang, et al. , When density functional approximations meet iron oxides, Journal of chemical theory and computa- tion 12, 5132 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Naveas, R

    N. Naveas, R. Pulido, C. Marini, P. Gargiani, J. Hernandez-Montelongo, I. Brito, and M. Manso- Silv´ an, First-principles calculations of magnetite (Fe3O4) above the Verwey temperature by using self- consistent DFT+U+V, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19, 8610 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Yamauchi, T

    K. Yamauchi, T. Fukushima, and S. Picozzi, Ferroelec- tricity in multiferroic magnetite Fe 3O4 driven by non- centrosymmetric Fe2+/Fe3+ charge-ordering: First- principles study, Physical Review B 79, 212404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    Yamauchi and S

    K. Yamauchi and S. Picozzi, Orbital degrees of free- 10 dom as origin of magnetoelectric coupling in magnetite, Physical Review B 85, 085131 (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    ˇRezn´ ıˇ cek, V

    R. ˇRezn´ ıˇ cek, V. Chlan, H.ˇStˇ ep´ ankov´ a, and P. Nov´ ak, Hyperfine field and electronic structure of magnetite below the Verwey transition, Physical Review B 91, 125134 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    ˇRezn´ ıˇ cek, V

    R. ˇRezn´ ıˇ cek, V. Chlan, H. ˇStˇ ep´ ankov´ a, P. Nov´ ak, J. ˙Zukrowski, A. Koz lowski, Z. Kakol, Z. Tarnawski, and J. Honig, Understanding the M¨ ossbauer spectrum of magnetite below the Verwey transition: Ab initio cal- culations, simulation, and experiment, Physical Review B 96, 195124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    Huang, Z.-Y

    H.-Y. Huang, Z.-Y. Chen, R.-P. Wang, F. M. de Groot, W.-B. Wu, J. Okamoto, A. Chainani, A. Singh, Z.-Y. Li, J.-S. Zhou, et al., Jahn-Teller distortion driven mag- netic polarons in magnetite, Nature Communications 8, 15929 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Z. Jia, M. Zhao, Q. Chen, R. Sun, L. Cao, K. Ye, T. Zhu, L. Liu, Y. Tian, Y. Wang, et al. , Spin transport modu- lation of 2D Fe3O4 nanosheets driven by Verwey phase transition, Advanced Science , 2405945 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.