REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimal e-value testing for properly constrained hypotheses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hypothesis testing via e-variables can be framed as a sequential betting game, where a player each round picks an e-variable. A good player's strategy results in an effective statistical test that rejects the null hypothesis as soon as sufficient evidence arises. Building on recent advances, we address the question of restricting the pool of e-variables to simplify strategy design without compromising effectiveness. We extend the results of Clerico(2024), by characterising optimal sets of e-variables for a broad class of non-parametric hypothesis tests, defined by finitely many regular constraints. As an application, we discuss this notion of optimality in algorithmic mean estimation, including for heavy-tailed random variables.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Optimal e-values for testing the mean of a bounded random variable against a composite alternative
For bounded-mean testing without absolute continuity, GROW and REGROW optimal e-variables exist and are exactly coin-betting e-values Eα(x)=1+α(x−µ0), with α given by explicit formulas.
-
Uniform mean estimation for monotonic processes
Coin-betting plus a monotonicity-based continuous union bound yields uniform, anytime-valid, variance-adaptive confidence bands for monotonic mean functions such as CDFs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.