Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 45 references

Holographic multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS$_3$-Vaidya

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a global quench in the AdS3-Vaidya holographic setting rearranges multipartite entanglement so that its spatial range first expands, then contracts, with larger-$n$ signals peaking later.

desk verdict A solid, genuinely new computation of multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS3-Vaidya, with a few presentational holes that a referee can fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09304 v1 pith:24UH2IDT submitted 2026-08-10 hep-th

Xin-Xiang Ju , Ya-Wen Sun , Yang Zhao , Hao-Ran Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords multipartiteentanglementholographicthermalizationAdS3-Vaidyan-partiteinformationHEGMECMarkovgapmulti-entropywedge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a global quantum quench in a two-dimensional holographic CFT reorganizes multipartite entanglement in a specific, time-ordered way: the spatial range over which $n$ intervals share a connected entanglement wedge first expands, then contracts as the system approaches local thermal equilibrium. Using the AdS$_3$-Vaidya dual, the authors compute critical separations $d_n(l,t)$ for $n=2,\dots,6$ and integrated HEGMEC signals $E_n(t)$, finding that all connectivity ranges grow on comparable early-time scales but relax hierarchically, with larger-$n$ signals peaking later and decaying more slowly. They also find that the Markov gap can remain enhanced after local thermalization, while the genuine tripartite multi-entropy for adjacent intervals returns to its vacuum value. These results matter because they show that thermalization redistributes entanglement across both spatial scales and multipartite structure, not just entropy magnitude.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the AdS$_3$-Vaidya thin-shell geometry. Boundary-anchored HRT geodesics are matched across the null shell; the renormalized length $L_{\rm ren}(\ell,t_b)$ in equation (2.12) supplies every entropy input. For $n$ equal intervals, the authors classify admissible non-crossing pairings; the dominant pairing defines the entanglement-wedge connectivity, and the HEGMEC window $d_{n-1}(l,t)<d<d_n(l,t)$ isolates exclusive $n$-partite entanglement. The critical curves $d_n(l,t)$ are solved numerically from $I_n(l,d_n,t)=0$; the integrated strength $E_n(t)$ then sums $J_n=(-1)^n I_n$ over the window. The Markov gap uses the entanglement-wedge cross-section $E_W$ via $h=2E_W-I(A:B)$, and the genuine tripartite multi-entropy uses a conjectured covariant three-leg soap-film network whose length $\Gamma(t)$ is extremized over a bulk junction.

What would settle it

Compute the genuine tripartite multi-entropy for the same adjacent-interval partition in a two-dimensional CFT global quench using an independent replica or lattice method; if the late-time value differs from $c/2\,\log(2/\sqrt3)$, the soap-film-based prediction fails. Alternatively, run a tensor-network simulation of a 1D critical chain after a global quench and check whether the Markov gap late-time plateau exceeds the vacuum value for small separations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that after a global quench in AdS$_3$-Vaidya, the reach of irreducible multipartite entanglement is transient: for equal intervals of length $l$, the critical separations $d_n(l,t)$ marking the transition between connected and disconnected $n$-party entanglement wedges rise above their vacuum values, peak near $t\simeq l/2$, and then fall to a common late-time plateau $d_f=\log 2/r_H$ for large $l$. In a fixed spatial configuration, the decreasing curves are crossed in order of increasing $n$, so the minimal number of intervals needed to support a connected wedge grows with time: the surviving collective entanglement migrates to larger total spatial separations. The integrated signal $E_n(t)$ peaks later for larger $n$, and the Markov gap can stay above its vacuum value after local thermalization, whereas the genuine tripartite multi-entropy $GM^{(3)}$ returns exactly to its vacuum value for the adjacent tripartition. The paper presents this as evidence that global quenches propagate entanglement from shorter to longer scales while reorganizing its multipartite structure.

Load-bearing premise

The late-time result for the genuine tripartite multi-entropy depends on a still-unproven guess about how to compute that quantity in changing spacetimes; if the guess is wrong, that result falls.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • When the critical curves $d_n(l,t)$ cross a fixed separation in descending order, the minimal collective support for a connected wedge grows from few intervals to many: surviving multipartite entanglement is carried by structures spanning larger spatial distances.
  • Because $E_n(t)$ peaks later for larger $n$, the integrated multipartite signal remains dynamically active after two-party entanglement has saturated, so local entropy saturation does not signal the end of multipartite reorganization.
  • The late-time plateau $d_{n,f}\simeq \log 2/r_H$ independent of $n$ for large $l$ implies thermal screening compresses all connectivity ranges to a single temperature-determined scale.
  • The Markov gap remaining above its vacuum value after local thermalization means the locally thermal pure state is less reducible to a triangle or SOTS structure than the vacuum for the same subregions.
  • The genuine tripartite multi-entropy returning to vacuum shows that the quench leaves no residual $GM^{(3)}$ for the adjacent partition, even though the state's entanglement structure is not identical to the vacuum.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The peak-time ordering $t_{n,\max}^{(E)} > t_{n-1,\max}^{(E)}$ might be a generic diagnostic of multipartite entanglement propagation in any quantum quench with a light cone, independent of holography; a tensor-network or cold-atom experiment could test it.
  • The coincidence $l_c = d_f = \log 2/r_H$ suggests a single thermal scale governs both the onset of correlations with an external purifier and the loss of same-boundary wedge connectivity; one could test whether this equality survives in higher-dimensional or charged Vaidya geometries, where BTZ-specific formulas change.
  • The re-entrant Markov-gap dynamics (zero-positive-zero for fixed separation $d$ with $d_2(0)<d<d_{2,\max}$) predicts a transient window where reflected entropy exceeds mutual information; this is a sharp, falsifiable signature for numerical simulations.
  • The HEGMEC-isolation idea could be checked in non-holographic quenches by comparing $(-1)^n I_n$ inside and outside the window in random stabilizer or free-fermion systems, testing whether fewer-party contributions indeed vanish.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS3-Vaidya after a global quench. Using the standard HRT geodesic formulas, it constructs holographic exclusive global multipartite entanglement configurations (HEGMECs) for n=2,...,6, computes the critical separations d_n(l,t) at which n-interval entanglement wedges connect, and defines integrated signal strengths E_n(t) over the HEGMEC windows. The paper reports that the spatial range of multipartite entanglement first expands and then contracts, with E_n(t) peaking later for larger n. It also computes the Markov gap in Section 4 and the genuine tripartite multi-entropy in Section 5, finding that the Markov gap can remain enhanced after local thermalization while GM^(3) returns to its vacuum value for the adjacent tripartition. Section 3.4 compares the optimized upper bound of -I3 in the late-time pure Vaidya state and in a thermal BTZ state, deriving a finite deficit DeltaU(l) whose critical length coincides with the thermal screening scale d_f=ln2/r_H.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a valuable and quantitative step beyond bipartite entanglement probes of holographic thermalization: it gives concrete, parameter-free predictions for the evolution of multipartite spatial ranges and integrated signals. The central HEGMEC analysis is internally consistent: it uses standard thin-shell HRT geodesic lengths, the connected/disconnected degeneracy of the full n-union determines d_n, the ordering d_{n-1}<d_n is checked numerically, and the late-time plateau d_f=log2/r_H follows analytically from Eqs. (3.31)-(3.34). No constants are fitted; r_H=1 is a scale choice. The paper is also candid about the conjectural status of the covariant soap-film prescription used in Section 5, which is an honest limitation. The work is likely to be of interest to the JHEP readership working on holographic entanglement and thermalization.

major comments (2)
  1. [3.4, after Eq. (3.56)] The derivation of DeltaU(l) contains unresolved placeholders: the text reads 'Using (??) and (3.56)' and 'the first RT branch in (??) dominates'. These prevent the reader from verifying how Eq. (3.58) and the branch threshold l_c=ln2 in Eq. (3.59) are obtained from the preceding I_th(A:B) expression and the definition of U_th(l). Because the identity l_c=d_f is advertised as one of the paper's results, these cross-references must be completed and the branch argument spelled out. This is a load-bearing gap in Section 3.4, even though it does not affect the Section 3.3 HEGMEC curves.
  2. [5, Eq. (5.3) and (5.20)] The late-time result GM^(3)_final = GM^(3)_vac is obtained by applying the 'proposed' covariant soap-film prescription of [28] to the time-dependent Vaidya geometry, as the paper itself flags on page 31. If that prescription is not valid or requires corrections in this background, the nonmonotonic evolution in Figure 10 and the vacuum-return statement in Eq. (5.20) do not follow. The authors should either supply supporting evidence for the covariant prescription (for example, consistency checks in the static BTZ limit, branch selection rules, or a discussion of why the extremal network is the correct one) or explicitly qualify the abstract and conclusions so that this result is presented as conditional on the conjecture.
minor comments (6)
  1. [3.3.2, Eq. (3.38)] The definition of E_n(t) sums over indices 1<=i_1<...<i_n<=N, but N is not specified in the text; since the boundary is noncompact, please state explicitly that a finite chain of N intervals is considered and define N before the formula.
  2. [3.4, Eq. (3.54)] The two branches of I_th(A:B) are presented after taking the L0 to infinity limit; showing the finite-L0 expression or a short derivation would make the branch competition in Eq. (3.56) more transparent.
  3. [5, Eq. (5.4)] The partition has C=A union B, which is noncompact; please specify the regulator and UV subtraction used for the multi-entropy and for GM^(3) so that the finite quantity in Eq. (5.14) is unambiguous.
  4. [4, last paragraph] The phrase 'thermal-form entropy' is awkward and unclear; it should likely read 'thermal-state entropy' or 'thermal-form entanglement entropy'.
  5. [3.3.1, item III] The finite-l correction in Eq. (3.35) is stated without derivation; a brief footnote showing the expansion of Eq. (3.31) would help the reader verify the claimed 1/(n-1) prefactor.
  6. [2.2, Eq. (2.12)] The quantity s(ell,t_b) is used in Eq. (2.12) before it is defined; either define it in the main text or add an explicit pointer to Appendix A where it is introduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central HEGMEC dynamics are computed from standard HRT geodesic data and are not equivalent to their inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's main quantitative claims—the nonmonotonic critical separations d_n(l,t) and the delayed peaks of E_n(t)—are outputs of the standard HRT minimization (2.16) using the thin-shell geodesic lengths (A.17) taken from the independent reference [8]. The critical distances are defined geometrically as connected/disconnected entanglement-wedge transitions and computed by solving I_n=0; the ordering d_{n-1}<d_n and the late-time plateau d_f=log2/r_H follow from (3.20) and (3.31)-(3.34), and are not imposed as inputs. The l_c=d_f coincidence in Section 3.4 is derived algebraically from the same BTZ geodesic function on both sides, not assumed; although the upper-bound formula (3.43) is cited to the authors' prior work [22,23], the subsequent derivation of ∆U(l) is explicit. The unresolved '(??)' placeholders in Section 3.4 are a completeness defect but do not encode a circular reduction. Section 5's GM(3) result rests on the soap-film prescription that the paper itself labels 'proposed' and 'conjectured'; this makes the result conditional, not circular. The Markov gap section uses external definitions and standard EWCS branches. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no central equation equals its own input. Minor self-citations (HEGMEC interpretation, h_3 definition) are not load-bearing for the numerical dynamics.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; rH is set to 1 as a unit choice. All derived quantities follow from the stated geometry and literature conjectures. The multi-entropy soap-film prescription is an unproven conjecture but is flagged as such by the authors.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math HRT prescription: entanglement entropy of a boundary region equals the area of an extremal surface (Eq. 2.1).
    Used throughout the paper as the basic holographic entropy formula.
  • domain assumption AdS3-Vaidya thin-shell geometry models a global quench (Eq. 2.2).
    Standard holographic quench model, used to define the time-dependent background.
  • domain assumption Covariant multi-entropy equals the area of an extremal Lorentzian soap-film network (Eq. 5.3).
    Conjectural from [28]; the paper applies it to the time-dependent Vaidya geometry and explicitly notes it is a proposal.
  • domain assumption Holographic Markov gap equals 2 times the entanglement wedge cross section minus mutual information (Eq. 4.5).
    Taken from [24,25,37]; used as the geometric dual for the Markov gap.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS$_3$-Vaidya." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/24UH2IDT

@misc{pith2026260809304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic multipartite entanglement dynamics in AdS$_3$-Vaidya},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/24UH2IDT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09304}
}
abstract

We study how multipartite entanglement is dynamically reorganized during holographic thermalization following a global quench in AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$. We first use the $n$-partite information $(-1)^n I_n$ to probe collective multipartite entanglement in holographic configurations where the full $n$-region entanglement wedge is connected while all fewer-party ones are disconnected, thereby excluding fewer-party contributions. The spatial range of multipartite entanglement first expands and then contracts as the system approaches its late-time locally thermal state. Entanglement involving different numbers of parties develops on comparable early-time scales, while the entanglement that involves more parties relaxes more slowly, revealing a transient propagation from shorter to longer spatial distances. We further compute the Markov gap and the genuine tripartite multi-entropy as complementary probes of tripartite entanglement. The Markov gap can remain enhanced after local thermalization, whereas the genuine tripartite multi-entropy undergoes a nonmonotonic evolution and returns to its vacuum value for the adjacent tripartition considered in this work. These results show that a global quench redistributes the entanglement across spatial scales and reorganizes its multipartite structure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,New multipartite entanglement measure and its holographic dual,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 126001, [2206.09723]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. J. Short and A. Winter,Entanglement and the foundations of statistical mechanics,Nature Phys.2(2006) 754–758, [quant-ph/0511225]

    arXiv 2006

  3. [2]

    Goldstein, J

    S. Goldstein, J. L. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka and N. Zanghi,Canonical Typicality,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 050403, [cond-mat/0511091]

    arXiv 2006

  4. [3]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  5. [4]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from ads/cft, Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]

    arXiv 2006

  6. [5]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy,JHEP08(2006) 045, [hep-th/0605073]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [6]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,JHEP07(2007) 062, [0705.0016]

    arXiv 2007

  8. [7]

    Abajo-Arrastia, J

    J. Abajo-Arrastia, J. Aparicio and E. Lopez,Holographic Evolution of Entanglement Entropy,JHEP11(2010) 149, [1006.4090]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri et al.,Holographic Thermalization,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 026010, [1103.2683]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, J. de Boer, N. Copland, B. Craps, E. Keski-Vakkuri et al.,Thermalization of Strongly Coupled Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 191601, [1012.4753]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Balasubramanian, A

    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, N. Copland, B. Craps and F. Galli,Thermalization of mutual and tripartite information in strongly coupled two dimensional conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 105017, [1110.0488]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Allais and E

    A. Allais and E. Tonni,Holographic evolution of the mutual information,JHEP01(2012) 102, [1110.1607]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Hartman and J

    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena,Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors,JHEP05(2013) 014, [1303.1080]. – 38 –

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh,Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 011601, [1305.7244]

    2014 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. J. Suh,Entanglement growth during thermalization in holographic systems, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 066012, [1311.1200]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Balasubramanian, M

    V. Balasubramanian, M. J. Kang, C. Murdia and S. F. Ross,Signals of multiparty entanglement and holography,JHEP06(2025) 068, [2411.03422]

    2025 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Balasubramanian, H

    V. Balasubramanian, H. Jiang and S. F. Ross,Time evolution of multi-party entanglement signals,JHEP06(2026) 055, [2511.16729]

    2026

  10. [17]

    Fujiki and K

    K. Fujiki and K. Tasuki,Multi-entropy in heavy local quenches,2606.12526

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Hayden, M

    P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney,Holographic Mutual Information is Monogamous, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 046003, [1107.2940]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Alishahiha, M

    M. Alishahiha, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M. R. Tanhayi,On the Time Evolution of Holographic n-partite Information,JHEP09(2015) 165, [1406.7677]

    2015 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Ju, T.-Z

    X.-X. Ju, T.-Z. Lai, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang,Holographic n-partite information in hyperscaling violating geometry,JHEP08(2023) 064, [2304.11430]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Ju, Y.-W

    X.-X. Ju, Y.-W. Sun and Y. Zhao,Upper bound of holographic entanglement entropy combinations,JHEP09(2025) 085, [2505.11059]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun, Y.-T. Wang and Y. Zhao,More on the upper bound of holographic n-partite information,JHEP03(2025) 184, [2411.19207]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Ju, W.-B

    X.-X. Ju, W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y. Zhao,Holographic multipartite entanglement from the upper bound ofn-partite information,2411.07790

    arXiv

  17. [24]

    Dutta and T

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner,A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section, JHEP03(2021) 178, [1905.00577]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Hayden, O

    P. Hayden, O. Parrikar and J. Sorce,The Markov gap for geometric reflected entropy,JHEP 10(2021) 047, [2107.00009]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Y. Zou, K. Siva, T. Soejima, R. S. K. Mong and M. P. Zaletel,Universal tripartite entanglement in one-dimensional many-body systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 120501, [2011.11864]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Entanglement Wedge Cross Sections Require Tripartite Entanglement, JHEP04(2020) 208, [1911.07852]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Iizuka and M

    N. Iizuka and M. Nishida,Genuine multientropy and holography,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 026011, [2502.07995]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Iizuka, S

    N. Iizuka, S. Lin and M. Nishida,More on genuine multientropy and holography,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 066014, [2504.16589]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony and A. Zeilinger,Bell’s theorem without inequalities,Am. J. Phys.58(1990) 1131

    1990

  24. [32]

    W. Dur, G. Vidal and J. I. Cirac,Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A62(2000) 062314, [quant-ph/0005115]

    2000 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Walter, D

    M. Walter, D. Gross and J. Eisert,Multi-partite entanglement,1612.02437. – 39 –

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Araki and E

    H. Araki and E. H. Lieb,Entropy inequalities,Communications in Mathematical Physics18 (1970) 160–170

    1970

  27. [35]

    M. E. Shirokov,Tight continuity bounds for the quantum conditional mutual information, for the Holevo quantity and for capacities of quantum channels,J. Math. Phys.58(2017) 102202, [1512.09047]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Mirabi, M

    S. Mirabi, M. R. Tanhayi and R. Vazirian,On the Monogamy of Holographicn-partite Information,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 104049, [1603.00184]

    2016 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Takayanagi and K

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto,Entanglement of purification through holographic duality, Nature Phys.14(2018) 573–577, [1708.09393]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nguyen, T

    P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel and B. Swingle,Entanglement of purification: from spin chains to holography,JHEP01(2018) 098, [1709.07424]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    B. M. Terhal, M. Horodecki, D. W. Leung and D. P. DiVincenzo,The entanglement of purification,J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 4286–4298, [quant-ph/0202044]

    2002 arXiv

  32. [40]

    N. Bao, K. Furuya and J. Naskar,Tripartite correlation signal from multipartite entanglement of purification,JHEP05(2026) 236, [2509.08209]

    2026 arXiv

  33. [41]

    X. Chen, X. Ji and Y.-W. Sun,Multipartite entanglement characterizing topological phase transitions in holographic nodal line semimetals,JHEP07(2026) 072, [2602.01545]

    2026 arXiv

  34. [42]

    J. K. Basak, D. Giataganas, S. Mondal and W.-Y. Wen,Reflected entropy and Markov gap in noninertial frames,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125009, [2306.17490]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Babaei Velni, M

    K. Babaei Velni, M. R. Mohammadi Mozaffar and M. H. Vahidinia,Evolution of entanglement wedge cross section following a global quench,JHEP08(2020) 129, [2005.05673]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gadde, V

    A. Gadde, V. Krishna and T. Sharma,Towards a classification of holographic multi-partite entanglement measures,JHEP08(2023) 202, [2304.06082]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Harper, T

    J. Harper, T. Takayanagi and T. Tsuda,Multi-entropy at low Renyi index in 2d CFTs, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 125, [2401.04236]. – 40 –

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.