Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Effective Lagrangian for the macroscopic motion of Weyl fermions in $^3$He-A

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper derives a single effective Lagrangian that describes macroscopic motion of the normal component of superfluid 3He-A in global thermodynamic equilibrium, with the superfluid itself treated as an external flowing and possibly…

desk verdict A serious, dense derivation with a genuinely new formalism, but the global-equilibrium constraints rest on an unproved operator-independence assumption that the authors themselves partially undercut. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00151 v4 pith:KPO27AN7 submitted 2024-12-30 cond-mat.mes-hall

M. Selch , M. A. Zubkov This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords superfluid3He-AWeylfermionsZubarevstatisticaloperatoremergentrelativisticinvariancevorticesNieh-YananomalyeffectiveLagrangianmacroscopicmotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives a single effective Lagrangian that describes the macroscopic motion of the normal, fermionic component of superfluid 3He-A when the superfluid background itself is also flowing and, possibly, rotating. The derivation starts from the Zubarev statistical operator, converts global thermodynamic equilibrium into a path integral, and identifies which background configurations are thermodynamically allowed. The central result is Eq. (202): a Lagrangian for emergent Dirac fermions coupled to a universal vierbein, an axial gauge field, and a spin-connection gauge field, with macroscopic motion encoded through a four-velocity field and chemical potentials. As an application, the paper computes pressure, energy density, entropy density, particle number density, and angular momentum density of the normal component rotating around a pure integer mass vortex. The result matters because it turns a longstanding two-fluid problem into a field-theoretic calculation with concrete, numerically evaluable predictions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Zubarev statistical operator converted into a functional integral: global thermodynamic equilibrium is imposed by demanding that the coefficient of every operator in the divergence of the logarithm of the statistical operator vanish separately. The paper reformulates the two emergent Weyl fermions at the Fermi points as a Dirac fermion doublet coupled to a scalar-valued vierbein and a non-Abelian spin-connection gauge field $B_\mu$, which combines two Berry connections and a spin connection mixing Dirac and internal spin spaces. A Majorana-type constraint, Eq. (A5), halves the degrees of freedom and must be imposed on the path integral. The resulting effective Lagrangian, Eq. (202), contains the macroscopic-motion data in a four-vector $U_\mu$ plus chemical potentials, while equilibrium constraints on the vierbein, torsion, and spin vorticity follow from the stationarity condition.

What would settle it

Compute the Gram matrix of the operators $\hat{T}^\mu_a$, $\hat{G}^a$, $\hat{j}^\mu_A$, $\hat{P}^{ab}$, and $\hat{j}^\mu_i$ on the constrained Majorana variable space for a pure mass vortex texture; if any linear dependence appears, the constraints of Eqs. (142)-(148) are over-restrictive. Experimentally, resolve the angular momentum density of the normal component at temperatures well below $v_\perp/R$ around a single pure mass vortex and compare its temperature dependence with Eqs. (234)-(237).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's claim is that in global thermodynamic equilibrium the normal component of 3He-A is described by the Lagrangian of Eq. (202) together with the constraints of Eqs. (142)-(162). Those constraints select the allowed superfluid backgrounds: the frigidity vector field must satisfy a Killing-type equation, the torsion tensor must have the appropriate Lie-derivative behavior, and spin vorticity must vanish wherever the corresponding spin-current operator is nonconserved. Under these conditions the derivation gives thermodynamic response functions for rotation around a pure mass vortex, Eqs. (231)-(237), which the paper evaluates numerically and compares with the high-temperature limit. The paper also reorganizes the usual matrix-valued vierbein description into a formulation with one scalar-valued vierbein plus a non-Abelian gauge field $B_\mu$ that collects Berry connections and spin connection, arguing this is the more natural language for the combined motion. The superfluid component is treated as an external background throughout, so backreaction of the normal component on the superfluid is not included.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the operator terms appearing in the stationarity condition of the Zubarev statistical operator remain linearly independent after the Majorana constraint, so the coefficient of each one must vanish separately; the paper does not prove this independence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Eq. (202) is correct, the thermodynamic response of the rotating normal component around a pure mass vortex is fully determined by the quantized mode sums in Eqs. (231)-(237), with no free parameters beyond temperature, chemical potential, angular velocity, and vortex winding number.
  • The global-equilibrium constraints imply that a pure mass vortex can coexist with a rotation axis misaligned from the vortex axis, because only the antisymmetrized Lie derivative of the torsion tensor must vanish; the paper states this freedom disappears for dipole-unlocked textures with nonzero corresponding spin-current terms.
  • The formulas cover both the $n_1=0$ and $n_1=1$ vortex sectors, so the topological index enters the thermodynamics only through the angular-momentum cutoff and the shifted energy levels, meaning the two sectors differ mainly at low temperature.
  • Because the derivation neglects superfluid dynamics, the computed response functions serve as a building block for vortex dynamics rather than a complete coupled two-fluid theory.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One implicit consequence the paper does not spell out is that the same Lagrangian can be used to build a local quasi-equilibrium hydrodynamic description of 3He-A grain by grain, since the Zubarev machinery applies locally as well as globally.
  • A testable extension would be measuring the angular momentum per particle around a single mass vortex at low temperature: the predicted monotonic increase with angular velocity and chemical potential is specific enough to discriminate this framework from simpler Landau-level models.
  • The derivation relies on the form of the vierbein and the anomaly structure, so the formalism could plausibly be carried over to rotating Weyl semimetals or other torsional condensed-matter systems with emergent relativistic fermions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an effective Lagrangian for the normal component of superfluid 3He-A in global thermodynamic equilibrium with a moving superfluid background, using the Zubarev statistical operator and a path-integral representation. The authors reformulate the emergent low-energy theory in terms of a universal real vierbein plus a non-Abelian spin-connection gauge field, derive the stationarity constraints on the superfluid background from global thermodynamic equilibrium, and then specialize to a rotating normal component around pure mass vortices. The final Lagrangian is Eq. (202), and the vortex analysis yields the thermodynamic response functions of Eqs. (231)-(237), including pressure, energy density, entropy density, particle number density, and angular momentum density, with numerical checks against Stefan-Boltzmann limits.

Significance. If the central derivation is correct, the paper provides a parameter-free first-principles effective theory for the normal component of 3He-A in a moving superfluid background, connecting Zubarev statistical mechanics with emergent relativistic fermions and topological defects. The explicit reformulation of the matrix-valued vierbein in terms of a real vierbein and a spin-connection gauge field is a useful technical contribution, and the vortex thermodynamics gives concrete, in-principle testable predictions. The main strength is that the construction is explicit and anchored in the known 3He-A action, with the high-temperature Stefan-Boltzmann limit serving as an external check. However, the central stationarity step relies on an operator-independence assumption that is neither proved nor made precise, and the path-integral conversion is largely delegated to a previous paper.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B.3, Eq. (140)] The passage from the stationarity condition to the global thermodynamic equilibrium constraints assumes that the operators whose coefficients appear in Eq. (140) are linearly independent on the physical Hilbert space, i.e. after the Majorana constraint of Eq. (A5) is imposed. The text asserts this basis property in Section IV.B.3 ('Our original set of currents ... forms a basis') but does not prove it. The later statement in Section V that j^{0μ}_V, j^{1μ}_V, j^{2μ}_V and j^{3μ}_A vanish identically on the constrained space shows that the unconstrained operator set is not independent on the physical state space. Nothing in the manuscript rules out nontrivial relations among the remaining T^μ_a, G^a, j^μ_A, P^{ab} and j^μ_i. If such a relation exists, the constraints (142)-(162), in particular the expression for Ω_ab in Eq. (145), need not follow from stationarity. Since H_ω in Eq. (216) and the thermodynamic response functions (231)-(237) depend on Ω_ab, the vortex application is directly affected. The authors should either prove the required independence on the constrained Hilbert space or reformulate the stationarity condition on the quotient space of physical operators and verify that the resulting constraints and thermodynamic results are unchanged.
  2. [Section V, Eqs. (187)-(202)] The operator-to-Lagrangian conversion is a load-bearing step, but the derivation is summarized from reference [24] rather than presented in a self-contained way. In particular, the treatment of normal ordering, the role of the coefficient c=1/2 introduced before Eq. (B4), and the elimination of one chiral component through the Majorana constraint are invoked without a complete demonstration. Since the final Lagrangian (202) is one of the paper's central outputs, an error in these steps would propagate directly into the thermodynamic results of Section VI. Please either supply the missing steps in sufficient detail or state precisely, with enough information to be checked, the hypotheses under which the construction of [24] applies to the present setting.
  3. [Section VI, Eq. (231)] The thermodynamic calculation at Eq. (231) combines the left-handed fermion spectrum with a four-species counting and a factor of two restored by the MIT bag boundary conditions stated in Eq. (230). The degree-of-freedom counting is essential for the absolute values of the thermodynamic quantities, even though the ratios shown in the plots may be less sensitive. This counting should be checked directly against the coherent-state path integral with the Majorana constraint, rather than inferred from chiral-mixing arguments. The authors should show that the counting is consistent with the original Nambu-Gorkov degrees of freedom and with the constraint of Eq. (62).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (238)] The displayed expression '4·7/8·1/90π²' is inconsistent with the stated result 7π²/180; if the intended Stefan-Boltzmann factor is π²/90, the display should read 4·7/8·π²/90.
  2. [Section VI, after Fig. 5] The sentence 'This is observed neither for the pressure nor the entropy densities' appears to contain a typo, since the comparison is between the entropy density and the other thermodynamic densities; please revise for clarity.
  3. [Abstract and Section I] There are several typographical slips, such as 'the the normal component motion' in the abstract and 'symmmetry group' in Section II.A; a careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  4. [References] References [25] and [47] appear to be the same paper by Alonso and Popov, and references [1] and [48] are by the same author with overlapping content; the duplicates should be reconciled.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective Lagrangian and vortex thermodynamics are derived from the known 3He-A action and the Zubarev operator without fitting; self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

I walked the paper's derivation chain. The central effective Lagrangian, Eq. (202), is obtained by substituting the explicit superfluid 3He-A vierbein, axial gauge field, and spin-connection gauge field B_mu into the established emergent fermion action of Eqs. (24), (35), and (52), rather than by assuming the target Lagrangian. The Zubarev statistical operator of Eq. (135) is built from the energy-momentum tensor, Lorentz tensor, and conserved currents of that same action; the global thermodynamic equilibrium constraints, Eqs. (142)-(162), follow from requiring stationarity, i.e., vanishing divergence of the integrand in Eq. (136). The coefficient-wise vanishing condition presumes that the current set forms a basis, which the paper asserts in Section IV.B.3 ('Our original set of currents ... forms a basis') but does not prove; this is an unverified mathematical assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular reduction, because the constraints are not defined in terms of the quantities later derived from them. The vortex spectrum of Eq. (226) and the thermodynamic response functions of Eqs. (231)-(237) are obtained by diagonalizing the explicitly constructed Hamiltonian H0 + H_omega of Eqs. (214)-(216) and then evaluating the standard grand canonical partition function; no parameter is fitted to the pressure, energy, entropy, particle number, or angular momentum density that is later reported. The high-temperature Stefan-Boltzmann limits of Eq. (238) provide an external, independent benchmark. The self-citations, notably [24], supply the path-integral technique for converting a density operator into an effective Lagrangian; they are methodological tools rather than the load-bearing target result, and citing one's own method paper is normal practice. The authors also explicitly flag the misalignment of vortex and rotation axes as a 'shortcoming' of their treatment, which is an honest limitation statement rather than a circular step. In summary, I find no step in which a predicted quantity is equivalent by construction to an input or to a self-citation; the minor non-load-bearing self-citations justify only a score of 2, not a finding of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation rests on the Zubarev global-equilibrium assumption, the standard emergent Weyl description of 3He-A, an unproved linear-independence step in the stationarity condition, and the MIT bag boundary modeling. No free parameters are fitted: the material constants v_parallel, v_perp, k_F enter as inputs, and the energy scale is fixed by the vortex configuration and cylinder radius.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The system is in global thermodynamic equilibrium described by the Zubarev statistical operator with log rho = -alpha - integral dSigma n_mu (T^mu_a B^a - 1/2 M^mu_ab Omega^ab - sum_i zeta_i j^mu_i).
    Section IV.A, Eqs. (65)-(75). This is the foundational assumption of the formalism and restricts macroscopic motion to Killing-vector types (uniform, rotating, accelerating).
  • domain assumption The low-energy normal component of 3He-A is described by two Weyl fermions near the Fermi points with the Majorana-like constraint psi_R(p) = i tau^1 sigma^2 psi_L^*(-p).
    Section III.A, Eqs. (22)-(25), following Volovik. This is the standard emergent-relativistic description, valid in the London limit with slow variation (Eq. (21)).
  • ad hoc to paper The operators T^mu_a, G^a, j^mu_A, P^ab and j^mu_i in the stationarity condition are linearly independent, so each coefficient in Eq. (138) must vanish separately.
    Section IV.B.3, Eqs. (138)-(140). The paper does not prove this independence; if some operators are linearly dependent due to the Majorana constraint or the duality S^mu_ab ~ epsilon^mu_nu_rho_sigma j^sigma_A, the resulting GTE constraints could be over-restrictive.
  • domain assumption The fermions are confined to a cylinder of radius R with MIT bag boundary conditions (i gamma^mu n_mu - 1) Psi at rho = R equals zero.
    Section VI, Eq. (229). This modelling choice for finite transverse size determines the quantized transverse momenta Q_{l,s}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effective Lagrangian for the macroscopic motion of Weyl fermions in $^3$He-A." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KPO27AN7

@misc{pith2026250100151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effective Lagrangian for the macroscopic motion of Weyl fermions in $^3$He-A},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KPO27AN7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00151}
}
abstract

We consider macroscopic motion of the normal component of superfluid $^3$He - A in global thermodynamic equilibrium within the context of the Zubarev statistical operator method. We formulate the corresponding effective theory in the language of the functional integral. The effective Lagrangian comprising macroscopic motion of fermionic excitations is calculated explicitly for the emergent relativistic fermions of the superfluid $^3$He - A phase immersed in a non-trivial bosonic background due to a space and time dependent matrix-valued vierbein featuring nonzero torsion as well as the Nieh-Yan anomaly. We do not consider the dynamics of the superfluid component itself and thereby its backreaction effects due to normal component macroscopic flow. It is being treated as an external background within which the emergent relativistic fermions of the normal component move. The matrix-valued vierbein formulation comprises an additional two dimensional internal spin space for the two axially charged Weyl fermions living at the Fermi points which may be replaced by one featuring a Dirac fermion doublet with a real valued vierbein, an axial Abelian gauge field and a spin connection gauge field mixing the Dirac and internal spin spaces. We carry out this change of description in detail and determine the constraints on the superfluid background as well as the the normal component motion as determined from the Zubarev statistical operator formalism in global thermodynamic equilibrium. As an application of the developed theory we consider macroscopic rotation around the axis of pure integer mass vortices. The corresponding thermodynamic quantities of the normal component are analyzed. Our formulation incorporates both superfluid background flow and macroscopic motion flow of the normal component and thereby enables an analysis of their interrelation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00151 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The allowed types of macroscopic motion of a substance in global thermodynamic equilibrium at constant inverse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of our path integral procedure. We parametrize our foliation of spacetime by hypersurfaces via the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Thermodynamic equilibrium pressure p in units of p0 (see Table I) as a function of temperature T (in the units of ω0) for four fermionic particle species ((L/L, ±) or equivalently (R/R, ±)) confined to a cylinder with finite transverse size but infinite longitudinal size subject to MIT bag boundary conditions without fermion doubling. The pressure is compared to its high temperature expression p∞ (upper plot) as wel… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Thermodynamic equilibrium energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Thermodynamic equilibrium entropy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Thermodynamic equilibrium particle number density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Thermodynamic equilibrium angular momentum density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    M. A. Zubkov, Wigner transformation, momentum space topology, and anomalous transport, Annals Phys.373, 298 (2016), arXiv:1603.03665

    arXiv 2016

  2. [1]

    This case is equivalent to a vanishing Lie derivative of the vierbein along the Killing vector fieldβµ

    Ωab = 0. This case is equivalent to a vanishing Lie derivative of the vierbein along the Killing vector fieldβµ. 2)∇µea ν = 0 (supplemented by Eq. (160) in the case of inhomogeneousd or non-vanishingBµ). This case implies homogeneity of the vierbein in space and time and moreover thatΩab =eaµebνωµν. We would now like to discuss several topological solutio...

    work page

  3. [2]

    It is convenient to introduce cylindrical coordinates expressed through Cartesian coordinates by x =ρcos(ϕ), y =ρsin(ϕ), z =z

    Pure(integer)massvortices: Weconsiderastationarysetupwithvanishingtranslationalvelocity vµ, acceleration aµ but nonzero rigid rotation around thez-axis with βω =−ω1 2 = ω2 1 ̸= 0 with angular velocity ω and 36 inverse temperatureβ = 1 T. It is convenient to introduce cylindrical coordinates expressed through Cartesian coordinates by x =ρcos(ϕ), y =ρsin(ϕ)...

    work page

  4. [3]

    We would like to consider once more the situation with nonzero rigid rotation of macroscopic motion

    Disclinations: We again assume stationarity with vanishing translational velocityvµ and accelerationaµ. We would like to consider once more the situation with nonzero rigid rotation of macroscopic motion. A radial (tangential) disclination in3He-A is defined by m = ˆϕ, n = ˆz, l = ˆρ, d =±ˆρ (m =−ˆρ, n = ˆz, l = ˆϕ, d =±ˆϕ). (239) The vector d is again di...

    work page

  5. [4]

    In order for the order parameter of the 3He-A-phase to be single-valued,d can no longer be dipole locked withl but instead fulfills d =cos(n1ϕ)ˆx +sin(n1ϕ)ˆy

    Fractional vortices: We consider fractional (or spin mass) vortices corresponding to the situation outlined above in the discussion of pure mass vortices, but now with2n1∈ Z such thatn1̸∈ Z. In order for the order parameter of the 3He-A-phase to be single-valued,d can no longer be dipole locked withl but instead fulfills d =cos(n1ϕ)ˆx +sin(n1ϕ)ˆy. (243) T...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Correspondingly, in this case temperature and chemical potential are constant as functions of time

    Motion with constant four-velocityuµ(x) = const . Correspondingly, in this case temperature and chemical potential are constant as functions of time

    work page

  7. [6]

    In this case temperature becomes a function of spatial coor- dinates

    Rigid rotation with constant angular velocityω. In this case temperature becomes a function of spatial coor- dinates. The whole theory becomes ill-defined at the distances larger than1/ω from the rotation axis. This means that we can use the Zubarev statistical operator for the case whenRω <1, whereR is the size (trans- verse extension) of the considered ...

    work page

  8. [7]

    The accelerationa appears as the thermodynamically conjugated quantity to the boost operator

    Accelerated motion with constant acceleration vectora. The accelerationa appears as the thermodynamically conjugated quantity to the boost operator. The interpretation of the theory in terms of the four velocityuµ(x) becomes ill-defined at timest >1/a. This situation is avoided in a physical system, as maintaining the finite accelerationa for times larger...

    work page

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    The statistical partition function of an equilibrium system of fermions interacting with the non-Abelian gauge field may be denoted asZ[nµ(x),uµ(x),β (x),µi(x)]

    The combination of the three types of motion explained above is also admitted for thermal equilibrium. The statistical partition function of an equilibrium system of fermions interacting with the non-Abelian gauge field may be denoted asZ[nµ(x),uµ(x),β (x),µi(x)]. It is a func...

  2. [9]

    In this caseUµ(x) is constant as well Uµ(x) = (1,v, 0, 0)

    Uniform linear motion along thex-direction with constant four velocity uµ(x) =γ(v)(1,v, 0, 0). In this caseUµ(x) is constant as well Uµ(x) = (1,v, 0, 0)

  3. [10]

    Then we have Uµ(x) = (1,−yω,xω, 0)

    Rigid rotation with constant angular velocityω around thez-axis uµ(x) = 1√ 1−ω2(x2 +y2) (1,−yω,xω, 0). Then we have Uµ(x) = (1,−yω,xω, 0)

  4. [11]

    matter” simulated by 50 the normal component in the presence of macroscopic motion on the background “vacuum

    The initially accelerated motion with accelerationa along thex-axis uµ(x) = 1√ (1 +ax)2−a2t2 0 (1 +ax,at 0, 0, 0). For the choicet0 = 0 we have Uµ(x) = (1, 0, 0, 0). One can see that in this case (especially for accelerated motion) the effective Lagrangian is especially simple...

  5. [12]

    (A9) Employing the relations in Eq

    Equations of motion Stationarity of the action with respect to the Grassmann-valued spinorΨ implies 0 = δS δΨ(x) =(1 4ΨT ˆU ˆd∗γ0← Dµiγbeµ b )T + (1 4ΨT ˆU ˆd∗iγ0γbeµ b ← Dµ)T + 1 4 ˆU ˆd∗iγ0γbeµ bDµΨ + 1 4 ˆU ˆd∗γ0Dµiγbeµ b Ψ =1 4i(γb)Teµ b (∇µ +iBT µ )(γ0)T ˆUT ˆd∗Ψ + 1 4(∇µ...

  6. [13]

    Canonical quantization The canonical conjugate momentum for the massless fermion field is given by (after applying partial integration) Π = ∂L ∂(D0Ψ) = 1 2cΨT ˆU ˆd∗i. (A13) In the quantum theory this implies the canonical anti-commutation relation {ˆΠs α(x), ˆΨr β(y)} =iδ3(x−...

  7. [14]

    The Universe in a Helium Droplet

    G. E. Volovik,“The Universe in a Helium Droplet.” (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  8. [15]

    Vollhardt and P

    D. Vollhardt and P. Wölfle,The superfluid phases of helium 3 (Taylor and Francis, London, 1990)

    1990

  9. [16]

    Volovik and M

    G. Volovik and M. Zubkov, Emergent weyl spinors in multi-fermion systems, Nuclear Physics B881, 514 (2014)

    2014

  10. [17]

    G. E. Volovik and T. Vachaspati, Aspects of3he and the standard electroweak model, Int. J. Mod. Phys.B 10, 471 (1996)

    1996

  11. [18]

    G. E. Volovik and M. V. Khazan, Dynamics of the a-phase of3he at low pressure, JETP55, 551 (1983)

    1983

  12. [19]

    G. E. Volovik, Symmetry in superfluid3he (1990) pp. 27–134

    1990

  13. [20]

    Nambu, Fermion - boson relations in bcs type theories, physica d15, 147–151 (1985); energy gap, mass gap, and spontaneous symmetry breaking, in, inBCS: 50 Years, edited by L

    Y. Nambu, Fermion - boson relations in bcs type theories, physica d15, 147–151 (1985); energy gap, mass gap, and spontaneous symmetry breaking, in, inBCS: 50 Years, edited by L. N. Cooper and D. Feldman (World Scientific, 2010)

    1985

  14. [21]

    G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov, Scalar excitation with leggett frequency in3he-b and the 125 gev higgs particle in top quark condensation models as pseudo-goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. D92, 055004 (2015)

    2015

  15. [22]

    G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov, Higgs bosons in particle physics and in condensed matter, J. Low Temp. Phys.175, 486 (2014)

    2014

  16. [23]

    G. E. Volovik and M. A. Zubkov, The nambu sum rule and the relation between the masses of composite higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D87, 301 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    C. X. Zhang and M. A. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on the anomalous quantum hall effect, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53, 195002 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    C. X. Zhang and M. A. Zubkov, Influence of interactions on integer quantum hall effect, Annals of Physics444, 169016 (2022), arXiv:2011.04030. 59

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    M. A. Zubkov and X. Wu, Topological invariant in terms of the green functions for the quantum hall effect in the presence of varying magnetic field, Annals of Physics418, 168179 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    M. S. M.Selch, M. A. Zubkov, and C. X. Zhang,Hall conductivity as the topological invariant in magnetic Brillouin zone, preprint (2021) arXiv:2112.03974

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Nieh and M

    H. Nieh and M. Yan, Quantized dirac field in curved riemann-cartan background. i. symmetry properties, green’s function, Annals of Physics138, 237 (1982)

    1982

  22. [30]

    Huang, B

    Z.-M. Huang, B. Han, and M. Stone, Nieh-yan anomaly: Torsional landau levels, central charge, and anomalous thermal hall effect, Physical Review B101, 125201 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Z. V. Khaidukov and M. Zubkov, Chiral torsional effect, JETP letters108, 670 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Nissinen and G

    J. Nissinen and G. E. Volovik, On thermal nieh-yan anomaly in topological weyl materials, JETP Letters110, 789 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Nissinen and G

    J. Nissinen and G. Volovik, Thermal nieh-yan anomaly in weyl superfluids, Physical Review Research2, 033269 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Nissinen, Emergent spacetime and gravitational nieh-yan anomaly in chiral p+ ip weyl superfluids and superconductors, Physical review letters124, 117002 (2020)

    J. Nissinen, Emergent spacetime and gravitational nieh-yan anomaly in chiral p+ ip weyl superfluids and superconductors, Physical review letters124, 117002 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Laurila and J

    S. Laurila and J. Nissinen, Torsional landau levels and geometric anomalies in condensed matter weyl systems, Physical Review B102, 235163 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    derivation of nonlinear generalized equations of quantum relativistic hydrodynamics

    D. N. Zubarev, A. V. Prozorkevich, and S. A. Smolyanskii, “derivation of nonlinear generalized equations of quantum relativistic hydrodynamics.”, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics40, 821 (1979)

    1979

  29. [37]

    Selch, R

    M. Selch, R. A. Abramchuk, and M. Zubkov, Effective lagrangian for the macroscopic motion of fermionic matter, Physical Review D109, 016003 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Alonso and V

    V. Alonso and V. N. Popov, Functional for the hydrodynamic action and the bose spectrum of superfluid fermi systems of the he3 type, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73, 1445 (1977)

    1977

  31. [39]

    P. N. Brusov and V. N. Popov, Stability of the bose spectrum of superfluid systems of the he3 type, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 78, 234 (1980)

    1980

  32. [40]

    P. N. Brusov and V. N. Popov, Nonphonon branches of the bose spectrum in the b phase of systems of the he3 type, JETP 51, 1217 (1980)

    1980

  33. [41]

    P. N. Brusov and V. N. Popov, Zero-phonon branches of the bose spectrum in the a phase of a system of the he3 type, JETP 52, 945 (1980)

    1980

  34. [42]

    Brusov and P

    P. Brusov and P. Brusov, Collective excitations in unconventional superconductors and superfluids, World Scientific Pub- lishing Co. Pte. Ltd (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Buzzegoli, E

    M. Buzzegoli, E. Grossi, and F. Becattini, General equilibrium second-order hydrodynamic coefficients for free quantum fields, JHEP10, 091, [Erratum: JHEP 07, 119 (2018)], arXiv:1704.02808 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, and A. Palermo, Exact equilibrium distributions in statistical quantum field theory with rotation and acceleration: scalar field, JHEP02, 101, arXiv:2007.08249 [hep-th]

    2007 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Buzzegoli, Thermodynamic equilibrium of massless fermions with vorticity, chirality and electromagnetic field, Lect

    M. Buzzegoli, Thermodynamic equilibrium of massless fermions with vorticity, chirality and electromagnetic field, Lect. Notes Phys.987, 59 (2021), arXiv:2011.09974 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    L. V. Bravina, K. A. Bugaev, O. Vitiuk, and E. E. Zabrodin, Transport Model Approach toΛ and ¯Λ Polarization in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Symmetry13, 1852 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Selch, M

    M. Selch, M. A. Zubkov, S. Pramanik, and M. Lewkowicz, Non-renormalization of the fractional quantum hall conductivity by interactions (2025), arXiv:2502.04047 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  40. [48]

    Yamamoto and Y

    A. Yamamoto and Y. Hirono, Lattice QCD in rotating frames, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 081601 (2013), arXiv:1303.6292 [hep-lat]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, and A. A. Roenko, Study of the Confinement/Deconfinement Phase Transition in Rotating Lattice SU(3) Gluodynamics, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.112, 9 (2020). 60

    2020

  42. [50]

    V. V. Braguta, A. Y. Kotov, D. D. Kuznedelev, and A. A. Roenko, Influence of relativistic rotation on the confinement- deconfinement transition in gluodynamics, Phys. Rev. D103, 094515 (2021), arXiv:2102.05084 [hep-lat]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    M. N. Chernodub, V. A. Goy, and A. V. Molochkov, Inhomogeneity of a rotating gluon plasma and the Tolman-Ehrenfest law in imaginary time: Lattice results for fast imaginary rotation, Phys. Rev. D107, 114502 (2023), arXiv:2209.15534 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    V. V. Braguta, I. E. Kudrov, A. A. Roenko, D. A. Sychev, and M. N. Chernodub, Lattice Study of the Equation of State of a Rotating Gluon Plasma, JETP Lett.117, 639 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    V. V. Braguta, M. N. Chernodub, A. A. Roenko, and D. A. Sychev, Negative moment of inertia and rotational instability of gluon plasma, (2023), arXiv:2303.03147 [hep-lat]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Morales-Tejera and K

    S. Morales-Tejera and K. Landsteiner, Out of equilibrium chiral vortical effect in holography, Phys. Rev. D102, 106020 (2020), arXiv:2006.16031 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [55]

    G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, Novel phase transition at the Unruh temperature, (2023), arXiv:2304.13151 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    R. V. Khakimov, G. Y. Prokhorov, O. V. Teryaev, and V. I. Zakharov, Unruh effect in curved space-time and hydrody- namics, (2023), arXiv:2308.08647 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    gluon matter under weak acceleration: lattice results

    M. Chernodub, A. S. Pochinok, A. Molochkov, D. V. Stepanov, and V. Goy, “gluon matter under weak acceleration: lattice results .” poster at the 8th international conference on chirality, vorticity, and magnetic field in quantum matter, july 22 - 26, 2024, at the west universit...

    2024

  50. [58]

    Hayata, Y

    T. Hayata, Y. Hidaka, T. Noumi, and M. Hongo, Relativistic hydrodynamics from quantum field theory on the basis of the generalized gibbs ensemble method, Phys. Rev. D92, 065008 (2015)

    2015

  51. [59]

    Hongo, Path-integral formula for local thermal equilibrium, Annals Phys.383, 10.1016/j.aop.2017.04.004 (2017)

    M. Hongo, Path-integral formula for local thermal equilibrium, Annals Phys.383, 10.1016/j.aop.2017.04.004 (2017)

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    functional for the hydrodynamic action and the bose spectrum of superfluid fermi systemsof the he3 type

    V. Alonso and V. N. Popov, “functional for the hydrodynamic action and the bose spectrum of superfluid fermi systemsof the he3 type.”, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73, 1445 (1977)

    1977

  53. [61]

    Volovik, Exotic properties of superfluid he 3 (1992)

    1992

  54. [62]

    Fujii and Y

    K. Fujii and Y. Nishida, Low-energy effective field theory of superfluid 3he-b and its gyromagnetic and hall responses, Annals of Physics395, 170 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Furusawa, K

    T. Furusawa, K. Fujii, and Y. Nishida, Hall viscosity in the a phase of superfluid he 3, Physical Review B103, 064506 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.