Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 47 references

Kagome Metal GdNb$_6$Sn$_6$: A 4d Playground for Topological Magnetism and Electron Correlations

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read GdNb6Sn6 is a new kagome metal whose Nb-4d orbitals dominate the Fermi-energy states while a frustrated triangular Gd network orders magnetically near 2.3 K, making it a 4d platform for studying topology, frustration, and correlations…

desk verdict A solid, reproducible characterization of a new 4d kagome metal; the 2.3 K magnetic transition is plausible but not yet microscopically confirmed. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00996 v1 pith:ISXJV7YD submitted 2025-01-02 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Yusen Xiao , Qingchen Duan , Zhaoyi Li , Shu Guo , Hengxin Tan , Ruidan Zhong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomemetalGdNb6Sn6RT6Sn6family4dtransitiontopologicalbandstructurefrustratedmagnetismmagnetotransportrare-earthstannide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

GdNb6Sn6 is a newly synthesized kagome metal that extends the well-studied RT6Sn6 family from 3d transition metals (V, Mn) to 4d niobium. The authors establish that it forms in the HfFe6Ge6-type structure with Nb kagome layers and a triangular Gd network, and that it orders magnetically near 2.3 K. Transport measurements show metallic resistivity, unsaturated positive magnetoresistance, and a hole-dominated multiband Hall effect. First-principles calculations place Nb-4d orbitals at the Fermi energy, with Dirac crossings, a van Hove singularity about 33 meV above the Fermi level, and flat bands. If correct, the compound gives researchers a 4d member of the family in which rare-earth frustration, topological bands, and electron correlations can be tuned by substituting the R site.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the HfFe6Ge6-type structure (space group P6/mmm) with isolated Nb kagome layers interleaved with Sn and GdSn2 layers, which places a frustrated triangular Gd lattice between topological 4d bands. The argument is carried by bulk thermodynamic and transport probes (susceptibility, specific heat, resistivity, Hall effect, magnetoresistance) together with first-principles density functional theory that identifies the Nb-4d kagome band features near the Fermi energy: Dirac crossings, a van Hove singularity, and flat bands. The comparison with the isostructural GdV6Sn6 serves as the experimental anchor that turns these observations into a statement about 4d versus 3d kagome physics.

What would settle it

Perform neutron or resonant X-ray magnetic diffraction on the same single crystals at temperatures between, say, 0.1 K and 4 K. If magnetic Bragg reflections appear with an order parameter vanishing at about 2.3 K, the transition is long-range ordering; if no magnetic reflections appear while the susceptibility peak persists, the feature is short-range or impurity-related. A complementary check is specific heat below 1.8 K, where a full lambda anomaly would complete the thermodynamic signature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that GdNb6Sn6 is a 4d kagome metal with two coupled networks: a niobium kagome plane that carries the topological band structure and a triangular gadolinium plane that carries the magnetism. Single crystals grown from Sn flux show a magnetic transition near 2.3 K in susceptibility and specific heat, with a slightly anisotropic response, two nearby transitions for H in-plane, and a metamagnetic step near 1 T at 1.8 K. The effective moment of 7.84 muB per formula unit matches Gd3+. Transport is metallic down to low temperature, the magnetoresistance is positive and does not saturate by 9 T, and the Hall coefficient is positive and nonlinear below 250 K, indicating hole-dominated multiband transport. Density functional theory shows the band structure is governed by Nb d orbitals, reproduces the kagome features (Dirac crossings at K, a van Hove singularity about 33 meV above the Fermi level, flat bands), and opens SOC gaps at the crossings. Comparison with GdV6Sn6 shows the Nb version has a lower ordering temperature, hole instead of electron carriers, and no negative magnetoresistance.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 2.3 K anomaly is an intrinsic long-range magnetic ordering transition of the Gd sublattice; the authors themselves note that this requires data below 1.8 K for a full lambda anomaly and neutron or resonant X-ray scattering to confirm the spin structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GdNb6Sn6 becomes a new 4d member of the RT6Sn6 family, allowing direct comparison with 3d vanadium and manganese members on the same crystal structure.
  • The Nb-4d band structure near the Fermi energy hosts multiple topologically nontrivial crossings; SOC opens gaps, leaving topological surface states as a prediction accessible to ARPES.
  • The triangular Gd network orders near 2.3 K while Nb bands dominate transport, making the compound a candidate for studying how frustrated magnetism couples to topological kagome bands.
  • The contrast with GdV6Sn6 (hole vs electron carriers, absence of negative magnetoresistance in the Nb version) constrains possible transport mechanisms in the 166 family.
  • Rare-earth substitution in the RNb6Sn6 series may tune both the magnetic ordering temperature and the position of the Dirac point relative to the Fermi energy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the DFT calculations put Gd f electrons in the core, the computed band structure omits 4f hybridization; treating f electrons explicitly could shift the Dirac point or the vHS position, which ARPES measurements could test.
  • The van Hove singularity 33 meV above the Fermi level sits unusually close to the chemical potential; doping or pressure that moves the Fermi level to the vHS might drive instabilities analogous to the density waves seen in related kagome metals, a possibility the paper does not explore.
  • The positive, unsaturated magnetoresistance with multiband Hall behavior suggests more than one Fermi surface sheet is active; complementary quantum oscillation measurements on high-quality crystals could directly map those sheets and test the calculated band structure.
  • If the 2.3 K transition is confirmed as long-range order by scattering, GdNb6Sn6 offers a clean system where the rare-earth magnetism and the 4d topological bands are spatially separated, which may allow separate tuning of the two subsystems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the synthesis and characterization of GdNb6Sn6, a proposed new niobium-based kagome metal with the HfFe6Ge6-type structure. The authors present powder X-ray diffraction with Rietveld refinement, magnetization and specific heat measurements showing an anomaly near 2.3 K, electrical resistivity with unsaturated positive magnetoresistance and a positive nonlinear Hall effect, and DFT calculations indicating Nb-4d dominated bands with Dirac-like crossings and a van Hove singularity near the Fermi energy. The paper compares GdNb6Sn6 with GdV6Sn6 and argues that the compound provides a platform for studying topological magnetism, frustrated Gd magnetism, and electron correlations in a 4d kagome lattice.

Significance. If the central claims hold, GdNb6Sn6 is a valuable new member of the RT6Sn6 family, extending this kagome platform from 3d to 4d transition metals and enabling direct comparison with GdV6Sn6. The strengths of the manuscript are its clear description of standard synthesis and characterization procedures, the transparent computational setup, and the explicit admission in the text that the magnetic transition and spin structure require further confirmation. However, the headline experimental claim of long-range magnetic ordering below 2.3 K rests on thermodynamic data that stop at 1.8 K in the presence of an Sn impurity phase, and the 'topologically nontrivial crossings' statement is not supported by any computed topological invariant. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's central narrative and should be addressed before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III (Figs. 4, 5)] The claim of long-range magnetic ordering below 2.3 K is not established by the presented data. The susceptibility peak and specific-heat inflection are measured only down to 1.8 K; the authors themselves state that a full λ anomaly requires lower-temperature specific-heat data and that the spin structure requires neutron or resonant X-ray confirmation. The Rietveld profile in Fig. 1(a) shows an Sn impurity phase, and no elemental or microprobe analysis is reported to rule out a minority Gd-Sn or Gd-Nb-Sn phase as the source of the anomaly. The field suppression and metamagnetic features are suggestive, but they do not prove a bulk intrinsic transition. Please either provide lower-temperature C(T), muSR/neutron scattering, or other phase-sensitive evidence, or revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusions to state that a magnetic anomaly is observed whose nature is presently unresolved.
  2. [§III, Fig. 7 and Abstract] The abstract and conclusions describe 'multiple topologically nontrivial crossings' and 'topological characteristics' of the band structure, but the manuscript never defines or computes a topological invariant (e.g., Z2 index, Chern number, or Wilson loop) for the crossings. The SOC-gapped Dirac points shown in Fig. 7(b) could be trivial gaps. Please provide a concrete topological classification or soften these statements to 'Dirac-like crossings' that are not claimed to be topologically nontrivial.
  3. [§III, Fig. 6] The 'hole-dominated multiband Hall effect' assertion is based on the positive sign and nonlinearity of ρxy(T, H), but no two-band fit or carrier-density/mobility extraction is reported. Positive ρxy can result from partial compensation of electron and hole carriers with different mobilities, and the noise in Fig. 6(b) (acknowledged in the text) makes quantitative claims fragile. Please fit the Hall data to a multiband model with uncertainties, or downgrade the claim to 'positive Hall coefficient suggesting dominant hole-like carriers.'
minor comments (7)
  1. [§IV (comparison text)] The text says 'Both compounds derive their magnetism from gadolinium on the honeycomb lattice,' but earlier the Gd ions are correctly identified as forming a triangular lattice; please correct this inconsistency.
  2. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption states 'The variation of magnetoresistance (MR) with temperature,' but the plotted quantity is MR versus magnetic field at fixed temperatures; please correct the wording.
  3. [Fig. 1(a) and §II] The label 'impurity(' appears incomplete. Please identify the impurity phase explicitly (Sn is mentioned in the text), and either include its reflections in the refinement or discuss its estimated amount.
  4. [§III, Curie-Weiss fit] The temperature range and uncertainties for the fitted parameters χ0, C, and θ are not reported; please provide them. The large value χ0 = 1.41×10−4 emu/mol also deserves a brief comment.
  5. [§III, Bloch-Grüneisen fit] The fitted parameters ρ0, A, ΘR, and n are given without uncertainties, and the fit range is not stated; please add this information.
  6. [Acknowledgements and PACS] There is a typo 'the the Ministry' in the acknowledgements, and 'PACS numbers: XXX' is a placeholder that should be filled or removed.
  7. [Throughout] Minor typographical issues include 'metalicity' (should be 'metallicity') and the sentence 'the specific heat increases rapidly at low temperatures, with an inflection point at about 2 K, and a full λ shape requires lower specific heat data' (the latter clause should be rephrased as a direct statement that lower-temperature data are needed).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's experimental characterizations and DFT band-structure results are self-contained, and the cited prior work by the authors is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—crystal structure, magnetic transition near 2.3 K, metallic transport, unsaturated MR, multiband Hall effect, and Nb-4d-dominated DFT band structure—are each supported by direct measurements or first-principles calculations performed with standard tools (VASP/PAW/GGA). The Curie-Weiss and Bloch-Grüneisen fits are explicitly labeled fits, and the fitted parameters are not renamed as predictions: the effective moment derived from the Curie-Weiss constant is compared with the free-ion Gd3+ value, and the resistivity exponent is reported as a fitted n or alpha. The DFT calculation uses stated lattice parameters and PAW potentials with f-electrons in the core, and the resulting Dirac points and van Hove singularities are read off the computed band structure, not imported from any prior result. The authors do cite their own earlier kagome theory and materials papers (refs. 24, 30, 40, 44), but these citations are contextual comparisons (e.g., surface-state detectability, Co-based 166 kagome behavior, RV6Sn6 properties) rather than the source of the present compound's measured or calculated properties. The manuscript also contains an explicit limitation passage: the specific-heat data stop at 1.8 K and only show an inflection, and the authors state that confirmation of non-collinear magnetic order 'requires future confirmation through magnetic scattering measurements (neutron or resonant X-ray).' This is an honest statement of under-determination, not circularity. No equation in the paper defines a target result in terms of its own input, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no external benchmark is replaced by a self-citation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard crystallography and DFT assumptions plus fitted transport and magnetic parameters. No new entities are proposed. The most consequential assumptions are the frozen Gd 4f core in DFT and the interpretation of the 2.3 K anomaly as long-range magnetic order, since neither is independently confirmed by microscopic probes or a topological invariant calculation.

free parameters (8)
  • Curie-Weiss constant chi0 = 1.41e-4 emu/mol
    Fitted to susceptibility data in Figure 3; no uncertainty reported.
  • Curie-Weiss constant C = 7.69 emu K/mol
    Fitted to (chi-chi0)^-1 versus T; used to derive mu_eff = 7.84 mu_B.
  • Curie-Weiss temperature theta = -6.1 K
    Fitted intercept; negative value used to infer antiferromagnetic correlations.
  • Residual resistivity rho0 (BG fit) = 0.036 mOhm cm
    Fitted in the extended Bloch-Grueneisen formula to resistivity above 4 K.
  • Bloch-Grueneisen amplitude A = 0.133 mOhm cm
    Fitted scale in the Bloch-Grueneisen formula.
  • Bloch-Grueneisen Debye temperature Theta_R = 300 K
    Fitted in the Bloch-Grueneisen formula; no uncertainty given.
  • Bloch-Grueneisen exponent n = 1.7
    Fitted exponent used to claim deviation from Fermi liquid behavior.
  • Low-temperature resistivity exponent alpha = 1.67
    Fitted power-law exponent in the 4-30 K range, matched to n = 1.7.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The HfFe6Ge6-type structure model in space group P6/mmm is correct, with Nb on the 6i kagome site and Gd on 1b.
    Used to assign lattice parameters and layer stacking in Table I and Figure 2; refinement Rwp = 9.76% and chi2 = 1.85 are taken as sufficient.
  • domain assumption Gd 4f electrons are inert and can be frozen into the core in DFT (PAW potential of Gd3+, f electrons as core states).
    Invoked in the computational methods section; if 4f hybridization shifts low-energy bands, the claimed Dirac and van Hove singularity positions change.
  • domain assumption The 2.3 K susceptibility peak and specific heat inflection represent intrinsic long-range magnetic ordering.
    Assumed in the abstract and conclusions; the authors note the specific heat does not show a full lambda anomaly and that neutron or resonant X-ray confirmation is required.
  • domain assumption RKKY exchange between Gd moments controls magnetic ordering, and the cell expansion from Nb substitution modulates it.
    Used in the discussion to explain the lower ordering temperature relative to GdV6Sn6; no microscopic RKKY calculation is shown.
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE without Hubbard U captures the low-energy Nb 4d bands near the Fermi energy.
    Used for all band structure and DOS claims in Figure 7; correlation effects are only inferred from transport exponents.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kagome Metal GdNb$_6$Sn$_6$: A 4d Playground for Topological Magnetism and Electron Correlations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ISXJV7YD

@misc{pith2026250100996,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kagome Metal GdNb$_6$Sn$_6$: A 4d Playground for Topological Magnetism and Electron Correlations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ISXJV7YD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00996}
}
abstract

Magnetic kagome metals have garnered considerable attention as an ideal platform for investigating intrinsic topological structures, frustrated magnetism, and electron correlation effects. In this work, we present the synthesis and detailed characterization of GdNb$_6$Sn$_6$, a metal that features a niobium-based kagome lattice and a frustrated triangular gadolinium network. The compound adopts the HfFe$_6$Ge$_6$-type crystal structure, with lattice parameters of a = b = 5.765(4) {\AA} and c = 9.536(8) {\AA}. Magnetic susceptibility and specific heat measurements reveal a magnetic transition near 2.3 K. Electrical transport data confirm metallic behavior, unsaturated positive magnetoresistance, and a hole-dominated multiband Hall effect. Furthermore, first-principles calculations indicate that Nb-4d orbitals predominantly contribute to the electronic states near the Fermi energy, with the band structure showing multiple topologically nontrivial crossings around the Fermi surface. This study also compares GdNb$_6$Sn$_6$ with GdV$_6$Sn$_6$, highlighting their similarities and differences. Our findings pave the way for exploring RNb$_6$Sn$_6$ (R = rare earth) with customized substitutions of R sites to fine-tune their properties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00996 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (Color online) (a) Rietveld refinement profile of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (Color online) (a) The crystal structure of GdNb [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (Color online) Temperature-dependent magnetiza [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) ) The variation of magnetoresis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) First-principles electronic structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sachdev , journal Phys

    author S. Sachdev , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 45 , pages 12377 ( year 1992 )

    work page 1992

  2. [2]

    Ye , author M

    author L. Ye , author M. Kang , author J. Liu , author F. Von Cube , author C. R. Wicker , author T. Suzuki , author C. Jozwiak , author A. Bostwick , author E. Rotenberg , author D. C. Bell , et al. , journal Nature volume 555 , pages 638 ( year 2018 )

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Liu , author Y

    author E. Liu , author Y. Sun , author N. Kumar , author L. Muechler , author A. Sun , author L. Jiao , author S.-Y. Yang , author D. Liu , author A. Liang , author Q. Xu , et al. , journal Nat. Phys. volume 14 , pages 1125 ( year 2018 )

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Kida , author L

    author T. Kida , author L. Fenner , author A. Dee , author I. Terasaki , author M. Hagiwara , and author A. Wills , journal J. Phys.:Condens. Matter volume 23 , pages 112205 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    author B. R. Ortiz , author L. C. Gomes , author J. R. Morey , author M. Winiarski , author M. Bordelon , author J. S. Mangum , author I. W. Oswald , author J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera , author J. R. Neilson , author S. D. Wilson , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. Mater. volume 3 , pages 094407 ( year 2019 )

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Zhang , author Z

    author Z. Zhang , author Z. Chen , author Y. Zhou , author Y. Yuan , author S. Wang , author J. Wang , author H. Yang , author C. An , author L. Zhang , author X. Zhu , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 103 , pages 224513 ( year 2021 )

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Li , author T

    author H. Li , author T. T. Zhang , author T. Yilmaz , author Y. Y. Pai , author C. E. Marvinney , author A. Said , author Q. Yin , author C. Gong , author Z. Tu , author E. Vescovo , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. X volume 11 , pages 031050 ( year 2021 a )

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Tanaka , author Y

    author M. Tanaka , author Y. Fujishiro , author M. Mogi , author Y. Kaneko , author T. Yokosawa , author N. Kanazawa , author S. Minami , author T. Koretsune , author R. Arita , author S. Tarucha , et al. , journal Nano Lett. volume 20 , pages 7476 ( year 2020 )

    work page 2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Gong , author W

    author S.-S. Gong , author W. Zhu , author L. Balents , and author D. Sheng , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 91 , pages 075112 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  2. [10]

    Li , author Q

    author M. Li , author Q. Wang , author G. Wang , author Z. Yuan , author W. Song , author R. Lou , author Z. Liu , author Y. Huang , author Z. Liu , author H. Lei , et al. , journal Nat. Commun. volume 12 , pages 3129 ( year 2021 b )

    2021

  3. [11]

    author N. J. Ghimire , author R. L. Dally , author L. Poudel , author D. Jones , author D. Michel , author N. T. Magar , author M. Bleuel , author M. A. McGuire , author J. Jiang , author J. Mitchell , et al. , journal Sci. Adv. volume 6 , pages eabe2680 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  4. [12]

    Wang , author K

    author Q. Wang , author K. J. Neubauer , author C. Duan , author Q. Yin , author S. Fujitsu , author H. Hosono , author F. Ye , author R. Zhang , author S. Chi , author K. Krycka , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 103 , pages 014416 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  5. [13]

    Ma , author X

    author W. Ma , author X. Xu , author Z. Wang , author H. Zhou , author M. Marshall , author Z. Qu , author W. Xie , and author S. Jia , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 103 , pages 235109 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  6. [14]

    Lee , author R

    author Y. Lee , author R. Skomski , author X. Wang , author P. Orth , author Y. Ren , author B. Kang , author A. Pathak , author A. Kutepov , author B. Harmon , author R. McQueeney , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 108 , pages 045132 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  7. [15]

    author R. L. Dally , author J. W. Lynn , author N. J. Ghimire , author D. Michel , author P. Siegfried , and author I. I. Mazin , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 103 , pages 094413 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  8. [16]

    Yin , author W

    author J.-X. Yin , author W. Ma , author T. A. Cochran , author X. Xu , author S. S. Zhang , author H.-J. Tien , author N. Shumiya , author G. Cheng , author K. Jiang , author B. Lian , et al. , journal Nature volume 583 , pages 533 ( year 2020 )

    2020

  9. [17]

    Xu , author J.-X

    author X. Xu , author J.-X. Yin , author W. Ma , author H.-J. Tien , author X.-B. Qiang , author P. S. Reddy , author H. Zhou , author J. Shen , author H.-Z. Lu , author T.-R. Chang , et al. , journal Nat. Commun. volume 13 , pages 1197 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  10. [18]

    Ishikawa , author T

    author H. Ishikawa , author T. Yajima , author M. Kawamura , author H. Mitamura , and author K. Kindo , journal J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. volume 90 , pages 124704 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  11. [19]

    Pokharel , author S

    author G. Pokharel , author S. M. Teicher , author B. R. Ortiz , author P. M. Sarte , author G. Wu , author S. Peng , author J. He , author R. Seshadri , and author S. D. Wilson , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 104 , pages 235139 ( year 2021 )

    2021

  12. [20]

    Porter , author G

    author Z. Porter , author G. Pokharel , author J.-W. Kim , author P. J. Ryan , and author S. D. Wilson , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 108 , pages 035134 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  13. [21]

    Lee and author E

    author J. Lee and author E. Mun , journal Phys. Rev. Mater. volume 6 , pages 083401 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  14. [22]

    Zhang , author Z

    author X. Zhang , author Z. Liu , author Q. Cui , author Q. Guo , author N. Wang , author L. Shi , author H. Zhang , author W. Wang , author X. Dong , author J. Sun , et al. , journal Phys. Rev. Mater. volume 6 , pages 105001 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  15. [23]

    author H. W. S. Arachchige , author W. R. Meier , author M. Marshall , author T. Matsuoka , author R. Xue , author M. A. McGuire , author R. P. Hermann , author H. Cao , and author D. Mandrus , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 129 , pages 216402 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  16. [24]

    Tan and author B

    author H. Tan and author B. Yan , journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 130 , pages 266402 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  17. [25]

    Hu , author J

    author Y. Hu , author J. Ma , author Y. Li , author Y. Jiang , author D. J. Gawryluk , author T. Hu , author J. Teyssier , author V. Multian , author Z. Yin , author S. Xu , et al. , journal Nat. Commun. volume 15 , pages 1658 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  18. [26]

    Rosenberg , author J

    author E. Rosenberg , author J. M. DeStefano , author Y. Lee , author C. Hu , author Y. Shi , author D. Graf , author S. M. Benjamin , author L. Ke , and author J.-H. Chu , journal Phy. Rev. B volume 110 , pages 035119 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  19. [27]

    He , author X

    author M. He , author X. Xu , author D. Li , author Q. Zeng , author Y. Liu , author H. Zhao , author S. Zhou , author J. Zhou , and author Z. Qu , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 109 , pages 155117 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  20. [28]

    Pokharel , author B

    author G. Pokharel , author B. Ortiz , author J. Chamorro , author P. Sarte , author L. Kautzsch , author G. Wu , author J. Ruff , and author S. D. Wilson , journal Phys. Rev. Mater. volume 6 , pages 104202 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  21. [29]

    Li , author S

    author H. Li , author S. Cheng , author G. Pokharel , author P. Eck , author C. Bigi , author F. Mazzola , author G. Sangiovanni , author S. D. Wilson , author D. Di Sante , author Z. Wang , et al. , journal Nat. Phys. pp. pages 1--7 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  22. [30]

    Xiao , author Y

    author Y. Xiao , author Y. Chen , author H. Ni , author Y. Li , author Z. Wen , author Y. Cui , author Y. Zhang , author S. Liu , author C. Wang , author R. Zhong , et al. , journal Inorg. Chem. ( year 2024 )

    2024

  23. [31]

    Hu , author X

    author Y. Hu , author X. Wu , author Y. Yang , author S. Gao , author N. C. Plumb , author A. P. Schnyder , author W. Xie , author J. Ma , and author M. Shi , journal Sci. Adv. volume 8 , pages eadd2024 ( year 2022 a )

    2022

  24. [32]

    Yue and author X.-W

    author C.-Y. Yue and author X.-W. Lei , journal Inorg. Chem. volume 51 , pages 2461 ( year 2012 )

    2012

  25. [33]

    Oshchapovsky , author V

    author I. Oshchapovsky , author V. Pavlyuk , author T. F. F \"a ssler , and author V. Hlukhyy , journal Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E:Struct. Rep. Online volume 66 , pages i82 ( year 2010 )

    2010

  26. [34]

    author B. R. Ortiz , author W. R. Meier , author G. Pokharel , author J. Chamorro , author F. Yang , author S. Mozaffari , author A. Thaler , author S. J. G. Alvarado , author H. Zhang , author D. S. Parker , et al. , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10635 ( year 2024 )

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kresse and author J

    author G. Kresse and author J. Furthm \"u ller , journal Comput. Mater. Sci. volume 6 , pages 15 ( year 1996 )

    1996

  28. [36]

    author P. E. Blochl et al. , journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter volume 50 , pages 17953 ( year 1994 )

    1994

  29. [37]

    author J. P. Perdew , author K. Burke , and author M. Ernzerhof , journal Phys. Rew Let. volume 77 , pages 3865 ( year 1996 )

    1996

  30. [38]

    author N. F. Mott , journal Adv. Phys. volume 13 , pages 325 ( year 1964 )

    1964

  31. [39]

    author G. K. White and author S. Woods , journal Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A volume 251 , pages 273 ( year 1959 )

    1959

  32. [40]

    Tan and author B

    author H. Tan and author B. Yan , journal Phys. Rev. B volume 109 , pages 195428 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  33. [41]

    Kang , author S

    author M. Kang , author S. Fang , author J.-K. Kim , author B. R. Ortiz , author S. H. Ryu , author J. Kim , author J. Yoo , author G. Sangiovanni , author D. Di Sante , author B.-G. Park , et al. , journal Nat. Phys. volume 18 , pages 301 ( year 2022 )

    2022

  34. [42]

    Hu , author X

    author Y. Hu , author X. Wu , author B. R. Ortiz , author S. Ju , author X. Han , author J. Ma , author N. C. Plumb , author M. Radovic , author R. Thomale , author S. D. Wilson , et al. , journal Nat. Commu. volume 13 , pages 2220 ( year 2022 b )

    2022

  35. [43]

    Jiang , author S

    author Y.-X. Jiang , author S. Shao , author W. Xia , author M. M. Denner , author J. Ingham , author M. S. Hossain , author Q. Qiu , author X. Zheng , author H. Chen , author Z.-J. Cheng , et al. , journal Nat. Mater. volume 23 , pages 1214 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  36. [44]

    Tan , author Y

    author H. Tan , author Y. Jiang , author G. T. McCandless , author J. Y. Chan , and author B. Yan , journal Phys. Rev. Res. volume 6 , pages 043132 ( year 2024 )

    2024

  37. [45]

    Feng , author Y

    author X. Feng , author Y. Jiang , author H. Hu , author D. C a lug a ru , author N. Regnault , author M. Vergniory , author C. Felser , author S. Blanco-Canosa , and author B. A. Bernevig , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13078 ( year 2024 )

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    author M. A. Ruderman and author C. Kittel , journal Phys. Rev. volume 96 , pages 99 ( year 1954 )

    1954

  39. [47]

    Lv , author Q

    author Z.-Y. Lv , author Q. Jiang , author J.-M. Wang , author H.-J. Qian , author D.-Y. Wang , author S. Qiao , and author M. Ye , journal Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. volume 17 , pages 2300083 ( year 2023 )

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.