Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Ultrasound Lung Aeration Map via Physics-Aware Neural Operators

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that Luna, a Fourier neural operator, reconstructs lung aeration maps directly from delayed ultrasound RF data, reaching a mean percent aeration error of 9.4% on 103 ex vivo swine lung scans and outperforming the…

desk verdict Luna is a genuinely new RF-to-aeration inverse map with real ex vivo work, but the 9.4% headline is measured against a different lobe than the one scanned, so the central validation is weaker than it looks. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01157 v1 pith:GCPOCKN2 submitted 2025-01-02 eess.IV cs.LGphysics.med-ph

Jiayun Wang , Oleksii Ostras , Masashi Sode , Bahareh Tolooshams , Zongyi Li , Kamyar Azizzadenesheli , Gianmarco Pinton , Anima Anandkumar This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.LGphysics.med-ph
keywords lungultrasoundaerationmapradiofrequency(RF)dataFourierneuraloperatorfull-wavesimulationexvivoswinedeeplearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Lung ultrasound is widely available, but its interpretation depends on years of training because clinicians read indirect B-mode artifacts rather than the lung itself. This paper claims that a deep learning model called Luna can skip that step entirely: given the raw radiofrequency (RF) data received by the transducer, Luna reconstructs a two-dimensional lung aeration map, a direct air-versus-tissue image, and from it computes the percent aeration, a key clinical quantity. Trained mostly on full-wave physics simulations and fine-tuned on only 18 real ex vivo swine scans, Luna reports a mean percent aeration estimation error of 9.4% (SD 5.4%) on 103 ex vivo scans, which the authors state outperforms the current clinical LUS scoring system. If this holds, raw ultrasound signals carry enough information to quantify lung air content without beamforming or human artifact interpretation, which would make consistent, quantitative lung monitoring more accessible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is a Fourier neural operator applied along the temporal dimension of the RF data: because the Fourier magnitude of a delayed signal is invariant to that delay, the temporal FNO learns to map the time history of received echoes onto the depth axis of the aeration map without being sensitive to chest-wall depth. A spatial convolutional network handles the lateral transducer-element and event dimensions, and a UNet supplies the chest-wall segmentation that is concatenated with the RF data. The training signal comes from Fullwave-2, a nonlinear full-wave solver that simulates ultrasound propagation through maps built from human chest-wall anatomy and swine lung histology; Luna is trained on 10,150 simulated pairs, fine-tuned on 18 real ex vivo samples, and regularized by temporal and lateral masking augmentation plus a direct percent-aeration loss.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to image and measure the same tissue: scan a lobe, then freeze, section, or micro-CT the exact scanned region (or the very lobe that is later weighed) to obtain a true local aeration value. If the region-matched mean absolute error is clearly above the reported 9.4%, say above 15%, the central claim would be contradicted; if it stays near 9.4%, the RF signal genuinely carries the aeration information the paper says it does.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the inverse problem of lung ultrasound, recovering the spatial distribution of air and tissue from the pressure field measured at the body surface, can be solved directly by a neural operator, and that the result is clinically meaningful. Luna takes delayed RF data $p$, computes a chest-wall segmentation $S(p)$ as an auxiliary task, and maps $(p, S(p))$ to a per-pixel aeration map $\hat{\rho}_A$; the percent aeration $\gamma$ is then obtained by averaging the map. On synthetic data the reconstruction reaches an average PSNR of 20.10 dB and SSIM of 0.605, with a percent aeration error of 5.2% (SD 4.6%); on real ex vivo swine lungs, after fine-tuning on 18 samples, the mean percent aeration error is 9.4% (SD 5.4%), with a worst case of 20.3%. The authors present this as the first demonstration that lung aeration maps can be reconstructed from ultrasound RF data, and as evidence that training on full-wave physics simulation followed by a small amount of real fine-tuning transfers to real tissue, offering a quantitative alternative to the semi-quantitative LUS score.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the lobe actually scanned has the same air content as the different lobes whose fluid displacement is measured for ground truth, the right lung and left caudal lobe are weighed while Luna images the left cranial lobe, and that the air content of the thin reconstructed slice represents the whole lobe's bulk aeration.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Clinicians could read pixel-level aeration directly from a scan, replacing the coarse 0-to-3 LUS score with a continuous quantitative estimate per examination.
  • Because the input is RF data rather than beamformed B-mode images, the result avoids the variability that time-gain compensation and device-specific display settings introduce.
  • Large real paired datasets may not be required: after simulation training, fine-tuning on 18 real samples was enough to reach 9.4% error on 103 ex vivo scans.
  • The 0.11-second per-case runtime (about 9 Hz) puts the reconstruction in reach of the real-time, interactive operation that lung ultrasound demands.
  • The small gap between in silico error (5.2%) and ex vivo error (9.4%) suggests the learned wave-propagation mapping transfers to real tissue, supporting the path toward in vivo validation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If aeration is regionally heterogeneous, as in ARDS, the lobe-mismatched ground truth would probably inflate the reported error; imaging and measuring the same lobe could tighten the number, or reveal that a thin slice cannot represent a whole lobe.
  • The delay-invariance mechanism, learning on Fourier magnitudes so the output ignores when echoes arrive, is not lung-specific; the same temporal-FNO design could be applied to other ultrasound inverse problems where the depth of the target structure varies between patients.
  • A testable extension is multi-frequency training: if the simulator creates RF data at several center frequencies, one could check whether the RF-to-aeration map generalizes across transducers, which is the main barrier to device-independent clinical use.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces LUNA, a Fourier neural operator pipeline that takes delayed ultrasound radio-frequency (RF) data as input and outputs a two-dimensional lung aeration map, from which a percent-aeration metric is computed. The model is first trained on 10,150 simulated RF/aeration-map pairs generated with the Fullwave-2 full-wave solver, then fine-tuned on 18 ex vivo swine lung scans, and finally evaluated on 103 further ex vivo scans. The authors report in silico map-reconstruction metrics (PSNR 20.10 ± 3.51 dB, SSIM 0.605 ± 0.128) and percent-aeration errors of 5.2% ± 4.6% in silico and 9.4% ± 5.4% ex vivo, and claim that this is the first direct reconstruction of lung aeration maps from RF data, bypassing beamforming and manual B-mode interpretation. The paper also claims superiority over the clinical LUS scoring system.

Significance. If the central claim were fully supported, this would be a valuable contribution to quantitative lung ultrasound: the use of raw RF data rather than B-mode images is a plausible way to preserve diagnostically relevant information and reduce reader dependence, and the proposed two-stage simulation-plus-fine-tuning strategy is pragmatic given the difficulty of collecting paired real RF and aeration data. The paper is transparent in several respects: it reports the exact 9.4% error with standard deviation, provides an ablation study of the network components, uses an experimentally validated full-wave simulator, and explicitly acknowledges in the Discussion that aligned ex vivo aeration maps are unavailable, so full verification of the 2D reconstructions is lacking. However, the ex vivo evaluation is undermined by a mismatch between the region whose aeration is measured and the region that is scanned, which means the headline 9.4% error is not a direct measurement of the quantity the paper's central claim concerns. The in silico validation is internally sound but cannot alone establish real-data generalizability for map reconstruction.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2, 'Aeration Calculation' and Section 2, 'Real Ex-Vivo Data'] The ex vivo ground-truth aeration is computed from units of the right lung and the caudal lobe of the left lung, whereas the scans are of the left cranial lobe. The reported 9.4% mean error therefore compares LUNA's prediction for the scanned left cranial lobe against a bulk-aeration measurement of a different lobe of the same animal. The target quantity for the central claim, i.e., the true aeration of the scanned region, is never measured. The assumption that aeration is homogeneous across lobes is not justified, especially because the experimental protocol instills fluid into the airways to create ARDS-like regional deaeration. This is a load-bearing gap: the headline result does not, as stated, demonstrate that RF data contain sufficient information to estimate aeration in the scanned region.
  2. [Section 2, 'Real Ex-Vivo Data' and Section 4.2, 'Aeration Calculation'] The reconstructed map is limited to a depth of 2.6 ultrasound wavelengths (about 0.8 mm), while the ground-truth aeration is the whole-lobe bulk value obtained by fluid displacement. Even if the scanned lobe matched the measured lobe, the comparison would equate a thin superficial slice with a bulk average over the entire lobe. The paper provides no evidence that the reconstructed slice is representative of the whole lobe, and given known depth-dependent aeration gradients in injured lungs, this assumption is not safe. The in silico experiments cannot resolve this issue because they use matched 2D ground-truth maps rather than a slice-to-bulk comparison.
  3. [Table 1 and Section 4.2, 'Ex-Vivo Data Acquisition'] The paper does not state whether the 18 fine-tuning scans and the 103 evaluation scans came from disjoint animals, nor does it describe an animal-level split. If scans from the same animal appear in both the fine-tuning and evaluation sets, the evaluation could be optimistically biased through animal-specific memorization. In addition, the counts are inconsistent: Section 4.2 states that 124 scans were performed, with 118 used for assessment and 6 for calibration, while Table 1 lists 18 fine-tuning plus 103 evaluation, summing to 121. The relationship between these numbers should be clarified and an animal-level split should be reported.
  4. [Section 2, 'Luna has strong generalizability to real ex-vivo data' and Section 3] The claim that LUNA 'outperforms the current lung ultrasound scoring system' is not supported by a quantitative comparison. The LUS score is an ordinal 0-3 scale assigned to B-mode images by human readers, not a percent-aeration measurement, and the paper presents no head-to-head comparison of LUNA against LUS scores on the same ex vivo data, nor any interobserver variability data for the LUS scoring. The statement in the Results that 9.4% error 'well outperforms the sensitivity of the current scoring system' is therefore an unsupported comparison. Either provide a direct comparison or temper the claim.
  5. [Discussion, Limitations, and Section 4.3, 'Model Calibration'] The paper's own limitation statement says that the lack of aligned ex vivo aeration maps prevents full verification of the 2D reconstructions, and that calibration is not available on real data because true 2D maps are unavailable. Despite this, the abstract and introduction describe the contribution as the first reconstruction of lung aeration maps from RF data and present the ex vivo results as demonstrating robust performance. The central claim is therefore stronger than the evidence: the ex vivo results support percent-aeration estimation (under the lobe-match caveat above), but not spatially resolved 2D map accuracy on real tissue. The manuscript should either present an ex vivo validation that can confirm map reconstruction (e.g., via a surrogate such as coregistered CT or locally measured aeration) or explicitly restrict the claim to percent-aeration estimation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 4.2, 'Ex-Vivo Data Acquisition'] The text contains unresolved placeholders: 'focal depth varied from X to Y cm' and, in Section 4.1, 'Both flattened (X cases) and naturally curved (Y cases)'.
  2. [Section 4.3, 'Model Calibration'] The phrase 'well-calibrated in silicon' is a typo for 'in silico'.
  3. [Figure 4 and its caption] The text in Section 2 refers to panels 4b, 4c, and 4d with somewhat inconsistent descriptions (e.g., the scatter plot versus box plot); please check that each citation points to the intended panel.
  4. [Table 1] The table lists aeration for the ex-vivo fine-tuning set as 33.4 without a standard deviation, while other entries include 'average ± SD'; please provide the missing standard deviation or explain its absence.
  5. [Section 4.1, 'Simulated Data Generation'] The sentence 'It allowed axial column translation for flattening of the lung and its deformation to conform with various parietal pleura curvature' would be clearer as 'These segmentations allowed axial column translation...'.
  6. [General] The paper would benefit from a statement on ethics or institutional approval for the use of animal tissue; the Tissue Sharing Program is mentioned, but the relevant oversight or approval is not explicitly stated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central ex vivo claim is an external fluid-displacement check; self-citations and the lobe-mismatch ground truth are validity caveats rather than by-construction reductions.

full rationale

Luna is trained on simulated RF/aeration pairs and fine-tuned on 18 real scans, then evaluated on 103 ex vivo scans against aeration measured by fluid displacement (Section 4.2). That target is not the training objective and is externally measured, so the 9.4% error is not a fitted quantity in the sense of a prediction forced by construction. The in silico PSNR/SSIM figures are self-consistency checks on the simulation distribution, but the paper's central real-data claim does not reduce to them. The main near-circular elements are: (a) the simulator's 'experimentally validated' status is supported largely by same-group citations ([28], [31]-[33], [38]-[44]) and 6 real scans from the same ex vivo rig were used to calibrate the simulations, and (b) the ex vivo ground truth is bulk aeration of the right lung / left caudal lobe while Luna scans the left cranial lobe, with no evidence of lobe-homogeneous aeration. These weaken the independence and validity of the 9.4% claim but are not by-construction reductions: the evaluation set is disjoint from fine-tuning and the ground truth is not derived from Luna's output. The paper itself concedes the lack of aligned ex-vivo aeration maps in the Discussion, limitation 1. I therefore assign a low circularity score of 2, reflecting only the minor self-citation and calibration concern.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The free parameters are hand-selected simulation and training constants; the most consequential is the histology binarization threshold because it defines the ground truth used for simulation and the undisclosed simulator calibration that may tie the training distribution to the evaluation setup.

free parameters (6)
  • Histology air/tissue brightness threshold = 0.8 in green channel
    Hand-chosen threshold used to binarize swine lung histology into air and non-air pixels, which defines the ground-truth aeration maps and the target of the simulation (Section 4.1).
  • Aeration loss weight eta = 0.5
    Hand-selected weight balancing cross-entropy map loss and L1 aeration loss in Eq. 19; affects the optimized model.
  • Temporal and spatial masking limits = Mt <= 200 steps; Ms <= 2000 elements
    Hand-chosen augmentation parameters for invariance to chest-wall reflections and lateral shifts (Section 4.3).
  • FNO hyperparameters = 2 layers, 32 channels, 87 Fourier modes
    Hand-selected architecture sizes for the temporal Fourier neural operator; no sweep or selection procedure reported (Section 4.3).
  • Reconstruction depth = 2.6 ultrasound wavelengths (~0.8 mm)
    Chosen limit on the output depth to match ultrasound penetration; the aeration map only covers this thin slice, which is then compared to whole-lobe bulk aeration (Section 4.2).
  • Simulator calibration parameters (undisclosed) = not reported
    Six real ex vivo scans were used 'for calibration of the simulations' (Section 4.2); the fitted simulation parameters are never listed, and their effect on the training distribution is unknown.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Fullwave-2 simulator accurately models nonlinear ultrasound propagation, attenuation, and reverberation in lung and chest wall.
    The entire synthetic training set depends on this; the paper cites the authors' own validation papers (Refs 28, 31-33) but does not revalidate in this work (Section 4.1).
  • domain assumption Air-filled alveoli can be represented as regions of constant zero pressure (total reflection, impermeability).
    Invoked in Section 4.1 to justify modeling air inclusions as zero pressure, following the authors' prior work; this is an approximation of the true impedance contrast.
  • domain assumption The aeration of the scanned left cranial lobe equals the bulk aeration measured from the right lung and left caudal lobe.
    Needed to compute the ex vivo ground-truth percent aeration for comparison; no lobe-level aeration variability analysis is provided (Section 4.2).
  • domain assumption The aeration of the superficial 2.6-wavelength layer predicted by Luna represents the whole-lobe bulk aeration.
    The model outputs a map only about 0.8 mm deep, but the ground truth is a volume-averaged aeration of an entire lobe; this assumption is not tested (Section 4.2 and Eq. 2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ultrasound Lung Aeration Map via Physics-Aware Neural Operators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GCPOCKN2

@misc{pith2026250101157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ultrasound Lung Aeration Map via Physics-Aware Neural Operators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GCPOCKN2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01157}
}
read the original abstract

Lung ultrasound is a growing modality in clinics for diagnosing and monitoring acute and chronic lung diseases due to its low cost and accessibility. Lung ultrasound works by emitting diagnostic pulses, receiving pressure waves and converting them into radio frequency (RF) data, which are then processed into B-mode images with beamformers for radiologists to interpret. However, unlike conventional ultrasound for soft tissue anatomical imaging, lung ultrasound interpretation is complicated by complex reverberations from the pleural interface caused by the inability of ultrasound to penetrate air. The indirect B-mode images make interpretation highly dependent on reader expertise, requiring years of training, which limits its widespread use despite its potential for high accuracy in skilled hands. To address these challenges and democratize ultrasound lung imaging as a reliable diagnostic tool, we propose LUNA, an AI model that directly reconstructs lung aeration maps from RF data, bypassing the need for traditional beamformers and indirect interpretation of B-mode images. LUNA uses a Fourier neural operator, which processes RF data efficiently in Fourier space, enabling accurate reconstruction of lung aeration maps. LUNA offers a quantitative, reader-independent alternative to traditional semi-quantitative lung ultrasound scoring methods. The development of LUNA involves synthetic and real data: We simulate synthetic data with an experimentally validated approach and scan ex vivo swine lungs as real data. Trained on abundant simulated data and fine-tuned with a small amount of real-world data, LUNA achieves robust performance, demonstrated by an aeration estimation error of 9% in ex-vivo lung scans. We demonstrate the potential of reconstructing lung aeration maps from RF data, providing a foundation for improving lung ultrasound reproducibility and diagnostic utility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Principled Approaches for Extending Neural Architectures to Function Spaces for Operator Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A practical recipe to convert common neural architectures into discretization-agnostic neural operators, validated by Navier-Stokes experiments showing cross-resolution generalization of FNO-style models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    lung monitoring

    Bouhemad, B., Mongodi, S., Via, G. & Rouquette, I. Ultrasound for “lung monitoring” of ventilated patients. Anesthesiology 122, 437–447 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Lacedonia, D.et al.The role of transthoracic ultrasound in the study of interstitial lung diseases: high- resolution computed tomography versus ultrasound patterns: our preliminary experience.Diagnostics 11, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Ultrasound mapping of lung changes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.The Clinical Respiratory Journal14, 54–63 (2020)

    Manolescu, D.et al. Ultrasound mapping of lung changes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.The Clinical Respiratory Journal14, 54–63 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Lichtenstein, D. A. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill.Annals of intensive care4, 1–12 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Lung ultrasound training: curriculum implementation and learning trajectory among respiratory therapists

    See, K.et al. Lung ultrasound training: curriculum implementation and learning trajectory among respiratory therapists. Intensive care medicine42, 63–71 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Vitale, J. et al. Comparison of the accuracy of nurse-performed and physician-performed lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of cardiogenic dyspnea.Chest 150, 470–471 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    & Mullan, C

    Whitworth, M., Bricker, L. & Mullan, C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.Cochrane database of systematic reviews(2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    S., Berry, C

    Mattoon, J. S., Berry, C. R. & Nyland, T. Abdominal ultrasound scanning techniques.Small Animal Diagnostic Ultrasound-E-Book94, 93–112 (2014)

    work page 2014

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Demi, L.et al.New international guidelines and consensus on the use of lung ultrasound.J Ultrasound Med 42, 309–344 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    & Inchingolo, R

    Soldati, G., Smargiassi, A., Demi, L. & Inchingolo, R. Artifactual lung ultrasonography: It is a matter of traps, order, and disorder.Applied Sciences10 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Sources of variability in the detection of b-lines, using lung ultrasound.Ultrasound in medicine & biology44, 1212–1216 (2018)

    Pivetta, E.et al. Sources of variability in the detection of b-lines, using lung ultrasound.Ultrasound in medicine & biology44, 1212–1216 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Effect of different probes and expertise on the interpretation reliability of point-of-care lung ultrasound.Chest 157, 924–931 (2020)

    Gomond-Le Goff, C.et al. Effect of different probes and expertise on the interpretation reliability of point-of-care lung ultrasound.Chest 157, 924–931 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Gravel, C. A.et al. Interrater reliability of pediatric point-of-care lung ultrasound findings.The American Journal of Emergency Medicine38, 1–6 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    & Pinton, G

    Ostras, O. & Pinton, G. Development and validation of spatial coherence beamformers for lung ultrasound imaging. 2023 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)1–4 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Lung ultrasound as a monitoring tool.Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases83, S12 (2020)

    Lee, J. Lung ultrasound as a monitoring tool.Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases83, S12 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Kalkanis, A. et al. Lung aeration in covid-19 pneumonia by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Journal of Clinical Medicine11, 2718 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound

    Volpicelli, G.et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive care medicine38, 577–591 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Automatic detection of a-line in lung ultrasound images using deep learning and image processing

    Xing, W.et al. Automatic detection of a-line in lung ultrasound images using deep learning and image processing. Medical physics50, 330–343 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    & Akhbardeh, A

    Sagreiya, H., Jacobs, M. & Akhbardeh, A. Automated lung ultrasound pulmonary disease quan- tification using an unsupervised machine learning technique for covid-19.Diagnostics 13, 2692 (2023). 18

    2023

  12. [20]

    Horry, M. J.et al. Covid-19 detection through transfer learning using multimodal imaging data.Ieee Access8, 149808–149824 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Pocovid-net: automatic detection of covid-19 from a new lung ultrasound imaging dataset (pocus)

    Born, J.et al. Pocovid-net: automatic detection of covid-19 from a new lung ultrasound imaging dataset (pocus). arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.12084(2020)

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Deep learning for classification and localization of covid-19 markers in point-of-care lung ultrasound

    Roy, S.et al. Deep learning for classification and localization of covid-19 markers in point-of-care lung ultrasound. IEEE transactions on medical imaging39, 2676–2687 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    & Demi, L

    Mento, F., Perpenti, M., Barcellona, G., Perrone, T. & Demi, L. Lung ultrasound spectroscopy applied to the differential diagnosis of pulmonary diseases: An in vivo multicenter clinical study. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control71, 1217–1232 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Generalizability and diagnostic performance of ai models for thyroid us.Radiology 307, e221157 (2023)

    Xu, W.et al. Generalizability and diagnostic performance of ai models for thyroid us.Radiology 307, e221157 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    M., Tofts, R

    Lee, P. M., Tofts, R. P. & Kory, P. Lung ultrasound interpretation.Point of Care Ultrasound E-book 59 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Automated lung ultrasound b-line assessment using a deep learning algorithm

    Baloescu, C.et al. Automated lung ultrasound b-line assessment using a deep learning algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control67, 2312–2320 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations (2020)

    Li, Z.et al. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations (2020). 2010.08895

    2020 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Pinton, G. A fullwave model of the nonlinear wave equation with multiple relaxations and relax- ing perfectly matched layers for high-order numerical finite-difference solutions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11476 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    & Volpicelli, G

    Gargani, L. & Volpicelli, G. How i do it: lung ultrasound.Cardiovascular ultrasound12, 1–10 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    F., Dahl, J., Rosenzweig, S

    Pinton, G. F., Dahl, J., Rosenzweig, S. & Trahey, G. E. A heterogeneous nonlinear attenuating full-wave model of ultrasound.IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 56, 474–488 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    & Pinton, G

    Ostras, O., Shponka, I. & Pinton, G. Ultrasound imaging of lung disease and its relationship to histopathology: An experimentally validated simulation approach.J Acoust Soc Am154, 2410–2425 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    E., Santibanez, F

    Soulioti, D. E., Santibanez, F. & Pinton, G. F. Deconstruction and reconstruction of image-degrading effects in the human abdomen using fullwave: phase aberration, multiple reverberation, and trailing reverberation. ArXiv (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Attenuation, scattering and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone.Medical Physics 455–467 (2011)

    Pinton, G.et al. Attenuation, scattering and absorption of ultrasound in the skull bone.Medical Physics 455–467 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Zhao, L., Fong, T. C. & Bell, M. A. L. Detection of covid-19 features in lung ultrasound images using deep neural networks.Communications Medicine4, 41 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    & Hou, J

    Hou, D., Hou, R. & Hou, J. Interpretable saab subspace network for covid-19 lung ultrasound screening (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    & Operto, S

    Virieux, J. & Operto, S. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics.Geophysics 74, WCC1–WCC26 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Recent advances and challenges of waveform-based seismic location methods at multiple scales

    Li, L.et al. Recent advances and challenges of waveform-based seismic location methods at multiple scales. Reviews of Geophysics58, e2019RG000667 (2020). 19

    2020

  30. [38]

    & Pinton, G

    Trahey, G., Bottenus, N. & Pinton, G. Beamforming methods for large aperture imaging.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America141, 3610–3611 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    & Trahey, G

    Bottenus, N., Pinton, G. & Trahey, G. The impact of acoustic clutter on large array abdominal imaging. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control(2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    J., Jakovljevic, M., Pinton, G

    Dahl, J. J., Jakovljevic, M., Pinton, G. F. & Trahey, G. E. Harmonic spatial coherence imaging: An ultrasonic imaging method based on backscatter coherence.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control59, 648–659 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    & Tanter, M

    Pinton, G., Aubry, J.-F., Fink, M. & Tanter, M. Numerical prediction of frequency dependent 3d maps of mechanical index thresholds in ultrasonic brain therapy.Medical physics39, 455–467 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    F., Aubry, J.-F

    Pinton, G. F., Aubry, J.-F. & Tanter, M. Direct phase projection and transcranial focusing of ultrasound for brain therapy.Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on 59, 1149–1159 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Shear shock wave injury in vivo: High frame-rate ultrasound observation and histological assessment.Journal of biomechanics166, 112021 (2024)

    Chandrasekaran, S.et al. Shear shock wave injury in vivo: High frame-rate ultrasound observation and histological assessment.Journal of biomechanics166, 112021 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    & Pinton, G

    Ostras, O., Soulioti, D. & Pinton, G. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging of the lung: A simulation approach based on propagation and reverberation in the human body.J Acoust Soc Am150, 3904 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    Lung ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: Clinical review.Advances in Respiratory Medicine91, 203–223 (2023)

    Rocca, E.et al. Lung ultrasound in critical care and emergency medicine: Clinical review.Advances in Respiratory Medicine91, 203–223 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    & Demi, L

    Mento, F. & Demi, L. On the influence of imaging parameters on lung ultrasound b-line artifacts, in vitro study.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America148, 975–983 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    & Demi, L

    Mento, F. & Demi, L. Dependence of lung ultrasound vertical artifacts on frequency, bandwidth, focus and angle of incidence: An in vitro study.J Acoust Soc Am.150, 4075 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Dietrich, C.et al.Lung b-line artefacts and their use.Journal of thoracic disease8, 1356–1365 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    & Lewy, H

    Courant, R., Friedrichs, K. & Lewy, H. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM Journal of Research and Development11, 215–234 (1967)

    1967

  42. [50]

    & Whitlock, D

    Spitzer, V., Ackerman, M., Scherzinger, A. & Whitlock, D. The visible human male: a technical report. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association3, 118–130 (1996)

    1996

  43. [51]

    & Taniguchi, N

    Kameda, T., Kamiyama, N. & Taniguchi, N. The mechanisms underlying vertical artifacts in lung ultrasound and their proper utilization for the evaluation of cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Diagnostics (Basel)12, 252 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    & Ochs, M

    Knudsen, L., Weibel, E., Gundersen, H., Weinstein, F. & Ochs, M. Assessment of air space size characteristics by intercept (chord) measurement: an accurate and efficient stereological approach.J Appl Physiol108, 412–421 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    & Buchin, M

    McKeighen, R. & Buchin, M. New techniques for dynamically variable electronic delays for real time ultrasonic imaging. 1977 Ultrasonics Symposium250–254 (1977)

    1977

  46. [54]

    & Cloutier, G

    Destrempes, F. & Cloutier, G. A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology36, 1037–1051 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    Salles, S.et al. Experimental evaluation of spectral-based quantitative ultrasound imaging using plane wave compounding.IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 20 61, 1824–1834 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    & Yoo, Y

    Park, S. & Yoo, Y. A new fast logarithm algorithm using advanced exponent bit extraction for software-based ultrasound imaging systems.Electronics 12 (2023). URL https://www.mdpi.com/ 2079-9292/12/1/170

    2023

  49. [57]

    Texture analysis on ultrasound: The effect of time gain compensation on histogram metrics and gray-level matrices.J Med Phys45, 249–255 (1920)

    Vara, G.et al. Texture analysis on ultrasound: The effect of time gain compensation on histogram metrics and gray-level matrices.J Med Phys45, 249–255 (1920)

    1920

  50. [58]

    a model for translational respiratory medicine

    Judge, E.et al.Anatomy and bronchoscopy of the porcine lung. a model for translational respiratory medicine. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology51, 334–343 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Oizumi, H. et al. Techniques to define segmental anatomy during segmentectomy.Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery3 (2014). URL https://www.annalscts.com/article/view/3507

    2014

  52. [60]

    The alveolar surface network: a new anatomy and its physiological significance.The Anatomical record251, 491–527 (1998)

    Scarpelli, E. The alveolar surface network: a new anatomy and its physiological significance.The Anatomical record251, 491–527 (1998)

    1998

  53. [61]

    A., van Hooijdonk, E

    Braithwaite, S. A., van Hooijdonk, E. & van der Kaaij, N. P. Ventilation during ex vivo lung perfusion, a review.Transplantation Reviews37, 100762 (2023). URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0955470X23000162

    2023

  54. [62]

    & Matthay, M

    Lee, J., Fang, X., Gupta, N., Serikov, V. & Matthay, M. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of e. coli endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106, 16357–16362 (2009)

    2009

  55. [63]

    & Weber, K

    Stengel, P., Frazer, D. & Weber, K. Lung degassing: An evaluation of two methods.Journal of applied physiology48, 370–375 (1980)

    1980

  56. [64]

    & Huber, G

    Edmunds, L. & Huber, G. Pulmonary artery occlusion. i. volume-pressure relationships and alveolar bubble stability.Journal of applied physiology22, 990–1001 (1967)

    1967

  57. [65]

    & Brox, T

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    Dice, L. R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species.Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945)

    1945

  59. [67]

    M., Pittie, T., Chakraborty, S

    Rashid, M. M., Pittie, T., Chakraborty, S. & Krishnan, N. A. Learning the stress-strain fields in digital composites using fourier neural operator.Iscience 25 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11214(2022)

    Pathak, J.et al. Fourcastnet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive fourier neural operators.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11214(2022)

    2022 arXiv

  61. [69]

    & Chitnis, P

    Guan, S., Hsu, K.-T. & Chitnis, P. V. Fourier neural operator network for fast photoacoustic wave simulations. Algorithms 16, 124 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    & Weinberger, K

    Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y. & Weinberger, K. Q. On calibration of modern neural networks (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods

    Platt, J.et al. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. Advances in large margin classifiers10, 61–74 (1999)

    1999

  64. [72]

    & Swersky, K

    Hinton, G., Srivastava, N. & Swersky, K. Neural networks for machine learning lecture 6a overview of mini-batch gradient descent.Cited on14, 2 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014). 21 Supplementary Information Appendix A Data Generation and Acquisition Details This section describes the creation of lung histology maps for simulating lung ultrasound da...

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    As discussed in Section 4.3 of the main paper, temporal masking strengthens the invariance ofLuna to temporal delay

    Temporal augmentation. As discussed in Section 4.3 of the main paper, temporal masking strengthens the invariance ofLuna to temporal delay. Empirically, removing temporal augmentation leads to 6.2% performance loss

  67. [75]

    As discussed in Section 4.3 of the main paper, spatial masking improves Luna’s ability to learn lateral correspondence

    Spatial augmentation. As discussed in Section 4.3 of the main paper, spatial masking improves Luna’s ability to learn lateral correspondence. Empirically, removing spatial augmentation leads to 0.9% performance loss

  68. [76]

    FNO module. The inclusion of the temporal Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) significantly reduces prediction error compared to replacing it with a ResNet module with equivalent parameters, high- lighting the effectiveness of FNO in capturing temporal dynamics. Empirically, replaci...

  69. [77]

    We set the aeration loss’s weightη = 0in Eqn

    The percent aeration loss. We set the aeration loss’s weightη = 0in Eqn. 19. We show that Lγ further refines the model’s predictions by directly optimizing the percent aeration accuracy. Empirically, removing percent aeration loss leads to 2.1% performance loss. These componen...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.