Reductions and degenerate limits of Yang-Baxter maps with $3\times 3$ Lax matrices

G. Papamikos; P. Adamopoulou; T.E. Kouloukas

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 25 references

Reductions and degenerate limits of Yang-Baxter maps with $3\times 3$ Lax matrices

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A family of $3\times 3$-Lax Yang-Baxter maps survives reductions and degenerate limits, ending at an integrable vectorial Adler-Yamilov map.

desk verdict A genuinely useful construction paper with a real reproducibility gap: the invariants supporting the main integrability claims are asserted rather than exhibited. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01210 v1 pith:GTTXIUCY submitted 2025-01-02 nlin.SI math-phmath.MP

P. Adamopoulou , T.E. Kouloukas , G. Papamikos This is my paper · ORCID

classification nlin.SImath-phmath.MP MSC 16T2537J1014E05

keywords Yang-BaxterequationbirationalmapsLaxmatricesdiscretedynamicalsystemssymplecticLiouvilleintegrabilityquadrirationalAdler-Yamilovmap

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a reduction and degeneration chain for parametric Yang-Baxter maps built from $3\times 3$ Lax matrices that are linear in the spectral parameter, $L(X,a,\lambda)=X-\lambda K_a$. Starting from an 18-dimensional map on pairs of matrices, it introduces extra essential parameters and reduces to an 8-dimensional symplectic quadrirational map $R_{p,q}$, then to a 4-dimensional map, and finally takes degenerate limits to produce birational, non-quadrirational Yang-Baxter maps. The endpoint is a vectorial Adler-Yamilov map that is shown to be symplectic and Liouville integrable, with four functionally independent Poisson-commuting invariants. A sympathetic reader would care because these maps supply the building blocks for integrable discrete dynamics and transfer maps whose monodromy spectra are preserved. The paper's central claim is that the whole chain, from the principal 18-dimensional map down to the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map, preserves the Yang-Baxter, Poisson, and integrability structure in each reduction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the refactorization of Lax matrices, $L(u,p,\lambda)L(v,q,\lambda)=L(y,q,\lambda)L(x,p,\lambda)$, for first-degree polynomial Lax matrices $L(X,a,\lambda)=X-\lambda K_a$. For a $3\times3$ diagonal $K_a$, the Sklyanin r-matrix bracket (12) turns the matrix entries into a Poisson space, and the coefficients $f_i$ of $\det(X-\lambda K_a)$ become Casimirs whose level sets define the symplectic reductions. The reductions pass through an inclusion map $\iota$ that solves three vanishing minor conditions, bringing the Lax matrix to the eight-dimensional form (24) and then to (33); degenerate limits $a_3\to 0$ and $(a_2,a_3)\to(0,0)$ produce the Lax matrices (38) and (46). These Lax matrices carry the argument because every claimed property, including quadrirationality, the Yang-Baxter equation, symplecticity, and the invariants, is derived from solving the refactorization problem and from the spectrum of the monodromy matrix.

What would settle it

Take the map (26)-(28) at a point where $D_1=0$ but the right-hand side of (25) has a finite refactorization; if the rational formulas for $(u,v)$ diverge while a bona-fide solution exists, the strong-Lax and quadrirationality claims for that parameter region collapse. For the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map (47) with $n=3$, a direct computation of the Poisson brackets $\{I_i,I_j\}$ on a random orbit should give zero for all $i,j$; any nonzero bracket contradicts Proposition 3.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the refactorisation problem for binomial $3\times3$ Lax matrices $L(X,a,\lambda)=X-\lambda K_a$ with diagonal $K_a$ supports a ten-parameter family of quadrirational Yang-Baxter maps that is closed under Poisson reduction to symplectic submanifolds and under degenerate parameter limits. Proposition 2.2 states that the eight-dimensional map $R_{p,q}$ displayed in (26)-(28) is a parametric quadrirational Yang-Baxter map with strong Lax matrix (24), is symplectic with respect to the canonical form, and admits four functionally independent invariants read from the monodromy. Proposition 3.3 states that the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map (47), obtained by the double limit $a_2,a_3\to 0$, is Liouville integrable and symplectic, with invariants (48)-(50). The degenerate limits are genuine: quadrirationality is lost, yet the limiting birational maps are still Yang-Baxter and carry Poisson-commuting integrals.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that all denominators and branch choices in the reduction formulas stay nonzero, including $x_{13},x_{23}$, $D_1,D_2$, $a_i u_i-b_3 v_i$, $\alpha_2,\beta_2$, the branch of $c_2$ in (19), and the double-limit constraints $x_{22}=x_{33}=1$, $x_{23}=x_{32}=0$, so that the quadrirational, symplectic, and integrability statements hold on the reduced manifolds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The 8-dimensional map (26)-(28) contains the non-degenerate Boussinesq and Goncharenko-Veselov YB maps as the special case $a_i=b_i=1$ with special $c_i,d_i$, so the new family unifies those examples under one strong Lax matrix.
The degenerate limit $a_3\to 0$ replaces quadrirationality by birationality but keeps the Yang-Baxter property and yields four independent invariants, so the family extends the known birational YB landscape.
The vectorial Adler-Yamilov map (47) is symplectic and Liouville integrable, with $I_1,I_2,I_3,I_4$ as a complete commuting set.
Every map in the chain preserves the spectrum of its monodromy matrix, so each generates Poisson transfer maps with commutative integrals.
The folding reduction (31) collapses the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map to the standard Adler-Yamilov map, and the $n$-vector generalisation retains the claimed integrability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same reduction chain suggests that a full classification of $3\times3$ binomial Lax matrices under conjugation is within reach: the diagonal case together with the remaining Jordan forms would complete it, which the authors state as future work.
If the degenerations are read in reverse, the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map appears as a limit of a quadrirational map, so techniques for quadrirational maps may transfer integrability information to non-quadrirational birational maps.
The invariants $I_3,I_4$ of the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map include determinants such as $(x_1y_2-x_2y_1)(X_1Y_2-X_2Y_1)$, suggesting a geometric, area-preserving or Plücker-type interpretation that the paper does not explicitly develop.
A testable extension is to replace the diagonal $K_a$ by a nontrivial Jordan form in (6); the paper's reduction machinery should produce a different family of YB maps whose limits may recover other known maps.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a solid construction paper in the integrable-systems classification program. The genuinely new piece is an 8-dimensional parametric Yang-Baxter map with a strong 3x3 Lax matrix, obtained by reducing the 18-dimensional refactorization map to a Poisson submanifold. The derivation is direct: the Lax matrix is explicit, the refactorization formulas are written out, and the Yang-Baxter property is verified by computation. That is real work and it appears correct.

The paper also extends the known Ka=Kb=I family to diagonal Ka and Kb, and derives degenerate limits that land on a vectorial Adler-Yamilov map. The endpoint vAY map is explicitly credited to earlier work; the contribution is the unified derivation and the intermediate family.

What it does well: the Poisson structure from the Sklyanin bracket is handled carefully, the reductions are coherent, and Proposition 3.3 (Liouville integrability of the vAY map) is properly supported. There the four invariants are written down, functional independence is argued via full-rank Jacobian, and Poisson commutation is credible.

The soft spot is the central integrability claim in Proposition 2.2. The paper states that the 8D map admits four functionally independent invariants from the characteristic polynomial of the monodromy, but only I1 and I2 are exhibited. The stress-test note is right: det M is fixed by the level-set parameters, so the characteristic polynomial yields only its trace and second elementary symmetric coefficient as dynamical data. Whether the lambda-expansions of those two coefficients give four independent functions—and not three, or functions of I1 and I2—is nowhere shown. The same gap appears for the 4D map in (32): the second invariant in (34) has all coefficients suppressed, so functional independence and Poisson commutation cannot be checked. This is a genuine reproducibility gap, not a fatal error. The regularity conditions for the reductions (x13 and x23 nonzero, denominators D1 and D2 nonzero, nonzero a_i u_i - b_3 v_i, and the branch choices in the limits) are also not assembled in one place.

The citation pattern is fine; the reliance on the group's own earlier refactorization results is appropriate since those are the base of the construction.

This paper is for specialists in Yang-Baxter maps and discrete integrable systems. It deserves a serious referee: the constructions are explicit and likely correct, and the gaps—missing invariants and uncollected nondegeneracy conditions—are addressable in revision. I would not desk-reject it.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies parametric Yang-Baxter maps associated with 3×3 binomial Lax matrices L(X, a, λ)=X−λKa, where Ka is diagonal. Starting from an 18-dimensional principal map from earlier work, the authors impose a system of vanishing minors to obtain an 8-dimensional reduced map with a strong Lax matrix and a canonical symplectic structure. A further folding reduction gives a 4-dimensional quadrirational map. They then take degenerate limits a3→0 and (a2,a3)→(0,0), obtaining a non-quadrirational 8-dimensional map and a vectorial Adler-Yamilov (vAY) map, respectively. The paper claims symplecticity, Yang-Baxter property, and various integrability statements (four functionally independent invariants for the 8D maps, Liouville integrability for the 4D and vAY maps). The explicit map formulas are given in equations (26)-(28), (39), (42), and (47).

Significance. If the asserted invariants and the regularity conditions are supplied, the paper would provide a useful, explicit family of parametric Yang-Baxter maps with strong Lax matrices, connecting known examples (Boussinesq, Goncharenko-Veselov, Adler-Yamilov) through reductions and degenerate limits. The paper is valuable for its explicit birational formulas, direct Yang-Baxter verifications, and the identification of the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map as a double limit within this Lax-matrix framework. The potential weakness is that the central integrability claims for the 8D and 4D maps rest on invariants that are not displayed, which currently prevents the reader from reproducing or verifying those claims. The vAY map in Proposition 3.3, by contrast, has explicit invariants and the required independence and involution can in principle be checked directly, though the proof as written does not show the computation.

major comments (4)

[§2.2, Proposition 2.2 and Eq. (30)] The proposition asserts that the 8D map (29) admits four functionally independent invariants obtained from the characteristic polynomial of the monodromy M(λ)=L(y,Y,q,λ)L(x,X,p,λ), but only two, I1 and I2 in (30), are given. Since det M(λ)=det L(y,q)det L(x,p) is fixed by the level-set parameters, the nonconstant spectral data are contained in tr M(λ) and the coefficient of λ in the characteristic polynomial. The paper does not show that the λ-expansions of these two coefficient functions yield four independent functions on the 8D phase space, nor does it give the other two invariants. This is a load-bearing gap for the claimed integrability, and the missing formulas or an explicit Jacobian-rank computation should be supplied.
[§2.3, Eq. (34)] The second invariant I2 of the 4D map (32) is written with all coefficients a^{kl}_{ij} suppressed ('For simplicity, we have omitted the exact dependence'). Consequently, the functional independence of I1 and I2, their Poisson commutation, and the asserted Liouville integrability of the 4D map cannot be checked from the manuscript. The coefficients should be given explicitly, or at least an algorithmic description plus a verification that they are nonzero and produce the claimed ranks and Poisson brackets.
[§3.1-§3.2, degenerate limits and regularity] The degenerate-limit construction does not assemble the nondegeneracy conditions under which the limits are valid. Examples include x13,x23≠0 for solution (15); D1,D2≠0 and a_i u_i−b_3 v_i≠0 in (26)-(28); the branch choice for c2 in the a3→0 limit and nonzero α2 in (35)-(36); and the double-limit assumptions x22=x33=1, x23=x32=0, α1=1, α2=0 in §3.2. Without a statement of these hypotheses, the claims that the limiting maps are Yang-Baxter maps, or that their quadrirationality/strong-Lax/integrability properties hold, are only valid on a generically defined open subset, and the paper should make that domain explicit.
[§3.2, Proposition 3.3] The proof of Liouville integrability for the vAY map (47) states that the Jacobian matrix of I1,...,I4 has full rank and that the invariants Poisson commute, but it does not show the actual Jacobian computation or the bracket evaluations. Since these statements are computational and the formulas are explicit, the proof should include at least the key intermediate result or an indication of how the vanishing of the Poisson brackets is obtained.

minor comments (5)

[§1.1, line 'M789,125'] The notation 'M789,125' and the reference to 'the matrix in (9)' is confusing because (9) is an equation, not a matrix; the authors likely mean the Poisson structure matrix induced by the Sklyanin bracket, and they should clarify the notation.
[§2.1, paragraph after (13)] The reduction from the 18D map to the 12D symplectic map on C is asserted but not proved; since this is a starting point of the paper, a reference to the precise result in [15] that covers the passage from the Poisson map to the reduced symplectic map would help orient the reader.
[§3.1, last line of (39) block] The phrase 'non quadritational' should be hyphenated or written as 'non-quadrirational', and similarly 'non-quadritational' in the following paragraph, to avoid a typographical error.
[§3.2, Eq. (45)] The notation f0:=x11−x12x21−x13x31=a uses the same letter a for the scalar level-set value and for the parameter a in the Lax matrix; this dual use is potentially confusing and should be disambiguated, for example by writing the level-set value as α0.
[Conclusions, graph] The graph summarizing the interconnections between the maps is not rendered as a readable figure in the text; the reader sees only a list of map names and dimensions. A proper diagram or a table of the parameter choices/limits would be more informative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new maps are obtained by explicit refactorization computations and algebraic limits, with the only prior-work dependence being the standard refactorization theorem from [14,15], which is independent support despite author overlap.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The principal map and its reductions are defined as explicit solutions of the refactorization equation (25), with formulas (26)-(28) and (32) written out in full and asserted to be verified by direct computation. The degenerate limits in Section 3 are obtained by taking parameter limits and choosing level-set branches, not by fitting parameters to a target map; the vAY map (47) is then recognized as a known object after the derivation, not used as an input. The only load-bearing external input is the general solution (7) and the Yang-Baxter criterion quoted from [14,15], which are prior published theorems with stated assumptions that do not include the specific 3x3 maps constructed here. Although [14,15] share an author with the present paper, they are not invoked to define the new maps' content, and the new claims rest on the explicit computations in this manuscript. The omitted invariant coefficients in (34) and the unexhibited fourth invariant in Proposition 2.2 are completeness or verification gaps, not circular reductions: the invariants are claimed to come from the monodromy characteristic polynomial, and no equation is defined in terms of the invariants it purports to produce. Similarly, the regularity assumptions in the reductions and limits are algebraic hypotheses, not circular dependencies on the conclusions. Therefore the paper receives a score of 0 for circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No data are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced. The construction uses the standard refactorization solution and Sklyanin bracket from the integrable-systems literature, plus domain assumptions on diagonal Ka and Kb and nondegeneracy, and ad hoc level-set choices in the degenerate limits.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The refactorization solution (7) for binomial Lax matrices is a quadrirational Yang-Baxter map and is Poisson with respect to the Sklyanin bracket.
Used throughout Section 2 as the starting point; taken from Kouloukas and Papageorgiou.
domain assumption Ka and Kb are nonzero diagonal 3x3 matrices, and every diagonalizable degree-one coefficient is covered by conjugation.
Section 2.1; restricts the classification domain and justifies the diagonal form.
domain assumption The minor equations (14) can be solved for x11, x31, and x32 with x13 and x23 nonzero, and the resulting submanifold M is Poisson.
Proposition 2.1; verified by direct computation but depends on the nondegeneracy of the chosen minors.
ad hoc to paper In the degenerate limits, alpha2 and beta2 are nonzero, a branch of c2 is chosen so the a3-to-0 limit is well defined, and in the double limit x22=x33=1 and x23=x32=0 are imposed.
Sections 3.1 and 3.2; these choices select the specific limiting maps, including the vectorial Adler-Yamilov map.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reductions and degenerate limits of Yang-Baxter maps with $3\times 3$ Lax matrices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GTTXIUCY

@misc{pith2026250101210,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reductions and degenerate limits of Yang-Baxter maps with $3\times 3$ Lax matrices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GTTXIUCY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01210}
}

abstract

We generalise a family of quadrirational parametric Yang-Baxter maps with $3\times 3$ Lax matrices by introducing additional essential parameters. These maps preserve a prescribed Poisson structure which originates from the Sklyanin bracket. We investigate various low-dimensional reductions of this family, as well as degenerate limits with respect to the parameters that were introduced. As a result, we derive several birational Yang-Baxter maps, and we discuss some of their integrability properties. This work is part of a more general classification of Yang-Baxter maps admitting a strong $3\times 3$ Lax matrix with a linear dependence on the spectral parameter.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Adamopoulou, S

P. Adamopoulou, S. Konstantinou-Rizos, and G. Papamikos, Int egrable exten- sions of the Adler map via Grassmann algebras Theor. Math. Phys. 207 553–559, 2021

work page 2021
[2]

Adler, A.I

V.E. Adler, A.I. Bobenko, and Yu.B. Suris, Geometry of the Yang- Baxter Maps: pencils of conics and quadrirational mappings, Comm. Anal. Geom. , 12 (5), 967– 1008, 2004

work page 2004
[3]

Adler and R.I

V.E. Adler and R.I. Yamilov, Explicit auto-transformations of integ rable chains, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. , 27 (2), 447–492, 1994

work page 1994
[4]

Baxter, Exactly solved models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, 1982

R.J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, 1982

work page 1982
[5]

Bobenko and Yu.B

A.I. Bobenko and Yu.B. Suris, Integrable noncommutative equat ions on quad- graphs. The consistency approach. Lett. Math. Phys. , 61, 241–254, 2002

work page 2002
[6]

Bukhshtaber, The Yang-Baxter transformation, Russ

V.M. Bukhshtaber, The Yang-Baxter transformation, Russ. Math. Surv. , 53 (6), 1343, 1998

work page 1998
[7]

Doliwa, Non-commutative rational Yang–Baxter maps, Lett

A. Doliwa, Non-commutative rational Yang–Baxter maps, Lett. Math. Phys. 104, 299–309, 2014

work page 2014
[8]

Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory , In P.P

V.G. Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory , In P.P. Kulish, editor, Quantum Groups , volume 1510 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

work page 1992

Show all 25 references

[9]

Goncharenko and A.P

V.M. Goncharenko and A.P. Veselov, Yang-Baxter maps and matr ix solitons, New trends in integrability and partial solvability , NATO Science Series, 132, 191–197, 2004

2004
[10]

Kassotakis, and T

P. Kassotakis, and T. Kouloukas, On non-abelian quadrirationa l Yang–Baxter maps, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55 175203, 2022

2022
[11]

Kassotakis, M

P. Kassotakis, M. Nieszporski, V. Papageorgiou and A. Tongas , Integrable two component systems of diﬀerence equations, Proc. R. Soc. A , 476, 20190668, 2020

2020
[12]

Konstantinou-Rizos and A.V

S. Konstantinou-Rizos and A.V. Mikhailov, Darboux transforma tions, ﬁnite re- duction groups and related Yang-Baxter maps, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 46, 425201, 2013

2013
[13]

Konstantinou-Rizos and T.E

S. Konstantinou-Rizos and T.E. Kouloukas, A noncommutative d iscrete potential KdV lift, J. Math. Phys. , 59 (6), 063506, 2018

2018
[14]

Kouloukas and V.G

T.E. Kouloukas and V.G. Papageorgiou, Yang-Baxter maps with ﬁ rst-degree- polynomial 2 × 2 Lax matrices, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 42, 404012, 2009

2009
[15]

Kouloukas and V.G

T.E. Kouloukas and V.G. Papageorgiou, Poisson Yang-Baxter ma ps with binomial Lax matrices, J. Math. Phys. , 52, 073502, 2011. 13

2011
[16]

Mikhailov, G

A.V. Mikhailov, G. Papamikos, and J.P. Wang, Darboux transform ation for the vector sine-Gordon equation and integrable equations on a sphere . Lett. Math. Phys., 106, 973–996, 2016

2016
[17]

Papageorgiou, Yu.B

V.G. Papageorgiou, Yu.B. Suris, A.G. Tongas, and A.P. Veselov, O n quadrira- tional Yang–Baxter maps, SIGMA, 6, 033, 2010

2010
[18]

Papageorgiou, F.W

V.G. Papageorgiou, F.W. Nijhoﬀ, and H.W. Capel, Integrable mapp ings and nonlinear integrable lattice equations, Phys. Lett. A , 147, 106–114, 1990

1990
[19]

Quispel, H.W

G.R.W. Quispel, H.W. Capel, V.G. Papageorgiou, and F.W. Nijhoﬀ, Int egrable mappings derived from soliton equations, Physica A, 173, 243–266, 1991

1991
[20]

Sklyanin, Some algebraic structures connected with the Ya ng-Baxter equa- tion Funct

E.K. Sklyanin, Some algebraic structures connected with the Ya ng-Baxter equa- tion Funct. Anal. Appl. 16 (4), 263–270, 1982

1982
[21]

Sklyanin, Classical limits of the SU(2)-invariant solutions of t he Yang-Baxter equation, J

E.K. Sklyanin, Classical limits of the SU(2)-invariant solutions of t he Yang-Baxter equation, J. Math. Sci. , 40, 93–107, 1988

1988
[22]

Suris and A.P

Yu.B. Suris and A.P. Veselov, Lax matrices for Yang-Baxter map s, J. Nonlin. Math. Phys. 10, 223–230, 2003

2003
[23]

Veselov, Yang-Baxter maps and integrable dynamics, Phys

A.P. Veselov, Yang-Baxter maps and integrable dynamics, Phys. Lett. A , 314 (3), 214–221, 2003

2003
[24]

Veselov, Yang-Baxter maps: dynamical point of view, Combinatorial Aspects of Integrable Systems (Kyoto, 2004) MSJ Mem

A.P. Veselov, Yang-Baxter maps: dynamical point of view, Combinatorial Aspects of Integrable Systems (Kyoto, 2004) MSJ Mem. , 17, 145–67, 2007

2004
[25]

Yang, Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction, Phys

C.N. Yang, Some exact results for the many-body problem in one dimension with repulsive delta-function interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 19, 1312, 1967. 14

1967

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Adamopoulou, S

P. Adamopoulou, S. Konstantinou-Rizos, and G. Papamikos, Int egrable exten- sions of the Adler map via Grassmann algebras Theor. Math. Phys. 207 553–559, 2021

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Adler, A.I

V.E. Adler, A.I. Bobenko, and Yu.B. Suris, Geometry of the Yang- Baxter Maps: pencils of conics and quadrirational mappings, Comm. Anal. Geom. , 12 (5), 967– 1008, 2004

work page 2004

[3] [3]

Adler and R.I

V.E. Adler and R.I. Yamilov, Explicit auto-transformations of integ rable chains, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. , 27 (2), 447–492, 1994

work page 1994

[4] [4]

Baxter, Exactly solved models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, 1982

R.J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in Statistical Mechanics, Academic Press, 1982

work page 1982

[5] [5]

Bobenko and Yu.B

A.I. Bobenko and Yu.B. Suris, Integrable noncommutative equat ions on quad- graphs. The consistency approach. Lett. Math. Phys. , 61, 241–254, 2002

work page 2002

[6] [6]

Bukhshtaber, The Yang-Baxter transformation, Russ

V.M. Bukhshtaber, The Yang-Baxter transformation, Russ. Math. Surv. , 53 (6), 1343, 1998

work page 1998

[7] [7]

Doliwa, Non-commutative rational Yang–Baxter maps, Lett

A. Doliwa, Non-commutative rational Yang–Baxter maps, Lett. Math. Phys. 104, 299–309, 2014

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory , In P.P

V.G. Drinfeld, On some unsolved problems in quantum group theory , In P.P. Kulish, editor, Quantum Groups , volume 1510 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics , Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

work page 1992