Pith. sign in

REVIEW 158 references

Four-Qubit Variational Algorithms in Silicon Photonics with Integrated Entangled Photon Sources

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A silicon photonic chip with four integrated entangled-pair sources executes two variational quantum algorithms at room temperature, reaching chemical accuracy for the Hydrogen molecule and recovering the factors of 35.

desk verdict A genuine first demonstration of VQAs on a silicon PIC with integrated SFWM sources, with a real but fixable gap around accidental-coincidence subtraction and a contradictory data-availability statement. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01301 v1 pith:STP3YO3F submitted 2025-01-02 quant-ph

Alessio Baldazzi , Matteo Sanna , Massimo Borghi , Stefano Azzini , Lorenzo Pavesi This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph MSC 81P6881V55
keywords variationalquantumeigensolverfactoringsiliconphotonicsintegratedphoton-pairsourcesspontaneousfour-wavemixingpath-entangledququartsroom-temperatureprocessorfour-qubitphotoniccircuit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single silicon photonic integrated circuit can run the full hybrid quantum-classical loop of a variational quantum algorithm at room temperature using only on-chip entangled photon sources. The authors execute two proof-of-principle tasks on the same four-qubit device: a variational quantum eigensolver for the Hydrogen molecule and a variational quantum factorization of the semiprime 35. The chip prepares a two-ququart path-entangled state from four spontaneous-four-wave-mixing spiral-waveguide sources, and normalized coincidence counts directly supply the probabilities in the cost function. The measured Hydrogen ground-state energy agrees with theory to about 0.003 Ha, and the factorization converges to the correct factors (7,5). If the claim holds, it shows that integrated photon-pair sources are sufficient for small-scale variational quantum processors, removing the need for external sources or cryogenic hardware in this class of demonstrations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-ququart path-entangled state $|\psi^{(4)}_{\mathrm{III}}\rangle = \sum_{m=1}^{4} \alpha_m |m\rangle_i |m\rangle_s$, where each four-level ququart is encoded in the spatial mode of one photon and therefore carries two qubits. The amplitudes $\alpha_m$ are set by the pump-splitting MZI network and serve as the variational parameters. The final MZI networks implement projective measurements onto $|2\rangle_i|2\rangle_s$, and the cost function is estimated by normalized coincidence counts, $C(\boldsymbol\alpha) = \sum_k w_k \sum_{m_1,m_2} \pi[k,I,m_1,m_2]\, \mathrm{CC}[\boldsymbol\alpha,k,I,m_1,m_2]/\mathrm{CC}_{\mathrm{tot}}[\boldsymbol\alpha,k,I]$. Using the energy-time entanglement of the spontaneous-four-wave-mixing pairs, converted to spatial correlation by routing and asymmetric MZIs, this scheme prepares correlated trial states without probabilistic CNOT gates.

What would settle it

Repeat the Hydrogen VQE at increasing on-chip pump powers per source while keeping all phase settings fixed; if the low-gain coincidence model is valid the estimated energy should remain flat within shot noise, so a systematic drift beyond statistics, or a heralded-interference visibility meaningfully below the reported 99.3%, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a reconfigurable silicon photonic circuit with four integrated photon-pair sources can prepare and measure the trial states needed for two distinct variational algorithms, and that the measured outcomes match theory. For the Hydrogen molecule, the UCC trial state $\cos\theta|1010\rangle - \sin\theta|0101\rangle$ is prepared by pumping two sources with a controlled amplitude ratio, and the expectation value of the electronic Hamiltonian is reconstructed from projected coincidence counts in two commuting groups of observables. The experiment finds the equilibrium ground-state energy $-1.1340 \pm 0.0124$ Ha at $\theta = 0.11 \pm 0.01$, compatible with the theoretical $-1.1373$ Ha, and a Bayesian optimizer reaches 0.003 Ha accuracy in 6 to 13 iterations. For factorization, the trial state is a superposition of four candidate bit strings for $N=35$, and gradient descent drives the amplitudes to $|1110\rangle$, the encoding of (7,5). The authors state this is the first demonstration of variational quantum algorithms on a photonic quantum simulator with integrated photon-pair sources.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the four on-chip sources are sufficiently indistinguishable and the pump power low enough that normalized coincidence counts equal the ideal single-pair probabilities; if multi-pair generation or source distinguishability biases those counts, every cost function in the paper is biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The same photonic processor solves both a chemistry problem and a factoring problem by changing only the classical coefficients $\{w_k\}$ and the measurement projectors, not the hardware.
  • Room-temperature operation means variational algorithms of this class do not inherently require cryogenic or vacuum environments.
  • With $d$ sources the detector count stays at two while the measurement settings grow as $d^2$; since up to 32 integrated spiral sources have already been reported, larger molecules and semiprimes are within reach of current technology.
  • The gradient-free Bayesian optimizer avoids the shot-noise-limited gradient problem observed for gradient descent on this chip, reaching 0.003 Ha accuracy in few iterations.
  • For the factorization instance, gradient descent on the three variational phases successfully drives the state to the correct factors, showing that a simple classical update is sufficient when the cost function has one commuting group.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The coincidence-basis model deliberately discards multi-pair events; at higher pump powers those events would either bias the estimated energy or could, if controlled, become a resource for larger entangled states.
  • Editorial: The same projector-and-coincidence strategy should transfer to other variational heuristics whose cost functions decompose into commuting groups of Pauli operators, as long as the trial state can be cast in the two-ququart Schmidt form.
  • Editorial: The paper quantifies source indistinguishability through visibility (99.3% for one pair) but does not propagate that visibility through to the energy uncertainty; doing so would give a direct error budget for the cost-function estimate.
  • Editorial: Because the two ququarts are entangled photon pairs, the scheme naturally produces the correlations that gate-based photonic processors obtain with probabilistic CNOT gates; connecting this preparation block to fusion-based or modular architectures is a plausible scaling path.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured VQE/VQF cost functions are benchmarked against independent theoretical computations, and the few self-citations are peripheral, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the cost function estimator in Eq. (6)/Eq. (A39) converts normalized coincidence counts into probabilities for projective measurements, and the weighted sums use externally computed coefficients — PSI4 for the H2 Hamiltonian (Ref. 114) and a direct classical expansion for H_fact=(N-pq)^2. The experimental energies and factorization outcomes are compared with independently computed benchmarks rather than with quantities constructed from fitted parameters. Device calibrations (App. D, Eq. A25; App. E) establish phase-current relations and do not inject the target results. The self-citations (Refs. 104, 113, 145) support background statements about source indistinguishability and mixed-state modeling, and the paper provides its own visibility (99.3%) and certified-dimension measurements, so they are not load-bearing. The appended Data availability statement ('No data were generated or analyzed in the presented research') is in sharp tension with the experimental report and is a reporting/credibility concern, not a circularity. Similarly, any unquantified accidental or multi-pair contamination in the coincidence-basis estimator is an experimental validity concern that does not reduce the derivation to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central results rest on standard quantum optics assumptions and the specific calibration of the chip.

free parameters (1)
  • Bayesian optimization hyperparameters M_K and sigma_K = M_K = 0.6, sigma_K = 0.65
    Chosen by hand for the Gaussian process kernel (App. H, Eq. A50). Not load-bearing for the central claim; the authors note they could be further optimized.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Post-selection in the coincidence basis is a valid method for the implemented state preparation and measurement.
    Used throughout Sec. 2 and App. B to map the physical state to the ququart basis.
  • domain assumption Low-gain approximation: at most one photon pair is generated per source; multi-pair events are negligible.
    App. B, Eq. (A13) expands to first order in squeezing parameter.
  • domain assumption The four sources are indistinguishable, so the photon pair state can be treated as a pure state with a single JSA.
    App. B, Eqs. (A13)-(A15); supported by visibility measurements in App. E.
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation and STO-3G minimal basis are adequate for the H2 ground state.
    Sec. 3 and App. H; standard quantum chemistry choices.
  • standard math The unitary transformations for measurement settings can be decomposed into the triangular MZI network as described.
    App. A, Eqs. (A6)-(A7), based on Reck/Clements.
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner mapping correctly maps the fermionic Hamiltonian to qubit operators.
    App. H, Eq. (A44).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Four-Qubit Variational Algorithms in Silicon Photonics with Integrated Entangled Photon Sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/STP3YO3F

@misc{pith2026250101301,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Four-Qubit Variational Algorithms in Silicon Photonics with Integrated Entangled Photon Sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/STP3YO3F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01301}
}
read the original abstract

Variational quantum algorithms are hybrid quantum-classical approaches extensively studied for their potential to leverage near-term quantum hardware for computational advantages. In this work, we successfully execute two variational quantum algorithms on a silicon photonic integrated circuit at room temperature: a variational quantum eigensolver for the Hydrogen molecule and a variational quantum factorization for semi-prime numbers. In our reconfigurable silicon photonic circuit, four identical spontaneous-four-wave-mixing-based integrated photon pair sources are used to prepare two path-entangled ququarts, whose correlation gives rise to the resource for generic trial states' preparation. This marks a first demonstration of variational quantum algorithms on a photonic quantum simulator with integrated photon pair sources.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01301 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic workflow of variational quantum algorithms. The procedure starts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The layout of the silicon photonic integrated circuit utilized for four-qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Normalized coincidences of correlated photons measured at the outputs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Graphical representation of atomic orbitals (AOs) and molecular orbitals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: On the left, the evolution of the minimum Bayesian search for the Hydrogen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) The problem encoding in our qubit register for the factorization of 35 followed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Simulating Physics with Computers,

    R. P. Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.21, 467–488 (1982)

    1982

  2. [2]

    The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation,

    D. P. DiVincenzo, “The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation,” Fortschritte der Physik48, 771–783 (2000)

    2000

  3. [3]

    Quantum information and computation,

    C. H. Bennett and D. P. DiVincenzo, “Quantum information and computation,” Nature404, 247–255 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University, 2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    What is a quantum simulator?

    T. H. Johnson, S. R. Clark, and D. Jaksch, “What is a quantum simulator?” EPJ Quantum Technol.1, 1–12 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    Universal quantum simulators,

    S. Lloyd, “Universal quantum simulators,” Science273, 1073–1078 (1996)

    1996

  7. [7]

    Defining and detecting quantum speedup,

    T. F. Rønnow, Z. Wang, J. Job,et al., “Defining and detecting quantum speedup,” Science345, 420–424 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,

    J. Preskill, “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,” Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    2018

Show all 158 references
  1. [9]

    Variational quantum algorithms,

    M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush,et al., “Variational quantum algorithms,” Nat. Rev. Phys.3, 625–644 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    What is quantum utility?

    R. Davis, “What is quantum utility?” inIBM Quantum blog,(2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices,

    J. Tilly, H. Chen, S. Cao,et al., “The variational quantum eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices,” Phys. Reports 986, 1–128 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Fidelity for mixed quantum states,

    R. Jozsa, “Fidelity for mixed quantum states,” J. Mod. Opt.41, 2315–2323 (1994)

    1994

  5. [13]

    Mesurement of qubits,

    D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, “Mesurement of qubits,” Phys. Rev. A64, 1–15 (2001)

    2001

  6. [14]

    Quantum tomography,

    G. M. D’Ariano, M. G. Paris, and M. F. Sacchi, “Quantum tomography,” Adv. Imaging Electron Phys.128, 205–308 (2003)

    2003

  7. [15]

    4 qubit quantum state tomography,

    J. B. Altepeter, D. F. James, and P. G. Kwiat, “4 qubit quantum state tomography,” inQuantum State Estimation, M. Paris and J. Řeháček, eds. (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004), pp. 113–145

    2004

  8. [16]

    Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,

    P. Shor, “Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring,” inProceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,(1994), pp. 124–134

    1994

  9. [17]

    Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem,

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem,” arXiv:9511026 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    Quantum algorithms revisited,

    R. Cleve, A. Ekert, C. Macchiavello, and M. Mosca, “Quantum algorithms revisited,” Proc. Royal Soc. London. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.454, 339–354 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,

    J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, “The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,” New J. Phys.18, 023023 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies,

    P. O’Malley, R. Babbush, I. Kivlichan,et al., “Scalable quantum simulation of molecular energies,” Phys. Rev. X6 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Hardware-efficientvariationalquantumeigensolverforsmallmolecules and quantum magnets,

    A.Kandala,A.Mezzacapo,K.Temme, etal.,“Hardware-efficientvariationalquantumeigensolverforsmallmolecules and quantum magnets,” Nature549, 242–246 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,

    A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt,et al., “A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,” Nat. Commun. 5 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm,

    J. Colless, V. Ramasesh, D. Dahlen,et al., “Computation of molecular spectra on a quantum processor with an error-resilient algorithm,” Phys. Rev. X8(2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Use vqe to calculate the ground energy of hydrogen molecules on ibm quantum,

    M. Qing and W. Xie, “Use vqe to calculate the ground energy of hydrogen molecules on ibm quantum,” arXiv:2305.06538 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Quantumimplementationoftheunitarycoupledclusterforsimulatingmolecular electronic structure,

    Y.Shen,X.Zhang,S.Zhang, etal.,“Quantumimplementationoftheunitarycoupledclusterforsimulatingmolecular electronic structure,” Phys. Rev. A95(2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quantum simulator,

    C. Hempel, C. Maier, J. Romero,et al., “Quantum chemistry calculations on a trapped-ion quantum simulator,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031022 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models,

    C. Kokail, C. Maier, R. van Bijnen,et al., “Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models,” Nature 569, 355–360 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Variational quantum eigensolver with reduced circuit complexity,

    Y. Zhang, L. Cincio, C. F. Negre,et al., “Variational quantum eigensolver with reduced circuit complexity,” npj Quantum Inf.8(2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor,

    A. Kandala, K. Temme, A. D. Córcoles,et al., “Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor,” Nature567, 491–495 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer,

    Y. Nam, J.-S. Chen, N. C. Pisenti,et al., “Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer,” npj Quantum Inf.6, 33 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Variational quantum factoring,

    E. Anschuetz, J. Olson, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and Y. Cao, “Variational quantum factoring,” inQuantum Technology and Optimization Problems,S. Feld and C. Linnhoff-Popien, eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019), pp. 74–85

    2019

  24. [32]

    Variational quantum computation integer factorization algorithm,

    X. Zhang and F. Zhang, “Variational quantum computation integer factorization algorithm,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62, 245 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    Prime factorization using quantum variational imaginary time evolution,

    R. Selvarajan, V. Dixit, X. Cui,et al., “Prime factorization using quantum variational imaginary time evolution,” Sci. reports 11, 20835 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Demonstrationofhardwareefficientphotonicvariationalquantumalgorithm,

    I.Agresti,K.Paul,P.Schiansky, etal.,“Demonstrationofhardwareefficientphotonicvariationalquantumalgorithm,” arXiv:2408.10339 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Gaussian boson sampling,

    C. S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni,et al., “Gaussian boson sampling,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 170501 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics,

    J. Wang, S. Paesani, Y. Ding,et al., “Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics,” Science 360, 285–291 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Programmable four-photon graph states on a silicon chip,

    J. C. Adcock, C. Vigliar, R. Santagati,et al., “Programmable four-photon graph states on a silicon chip,” Nat. Commun. 10, 3528 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1 0 14-dimensional hilbert space,

    H. Wang, J. Qin, X. Ding,et al., “Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1 0 14-dimensional hilbert space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250503 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon,

    D. Llewellyn, Y. Ding, I. I. Faruque,et al., “Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon,” Nat. Phys.16, 148–153 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Universal programmable photonic architecture for quantum information processing,

    B. Bartlett and S. Fan, “Universal programmable photonic architecture for quantum information processing,” Phys. Rev. A101, 042319 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Integrated photonic quantum technologies,

    J. Wang, F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, and M. G. Thompson, “Integrated photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics 14, 273–284 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Error-protected qubits in a silicon photonic chip,

    C. Vigliar, S. Paesani, Y. Ding,et al., “Error-protected qubits in a silicon photonic chip,” Nat. Phys.17, 1137–1143 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Advances in silicon quantum photonics,

    J. C. Adcock, J. Bao, Y. Chi,et al., “Advances in silicon quantum photonics,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 27, 1–24 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Quantum states generation and manipulation in a programmable silicon-photonic four-qubit system with high-fidelity and purity,

    J.-M. Lee, J. Park, J. Bang,et al., “Quantum states generation and manipulation in a programmable silicon-photonic four-qubit system with high-fidelity and purity,” APL Photonics9, 076110 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Optical quantum computing,

    J. L. O’Brien, “Optical quantum computing,” Science318, 1567–1570 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    The resurgence of the linear optics quantum interferometer — recent advances & applications,

    S.-H. Tan and P. P. Rohde, “The resurgence of the linear optics quantum interferometer — recent advances & applications,” Rev. Phys.4, 100030 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits,

    P. Kok, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto,et al., “Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 135–174 (2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,

    M. Reck, A. Zeilinger, H. J. Bernstein, and P. Bertani, “Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator,” Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 58–61 (1994)

    1994

  41. [49]

    Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers,

    W. R. Clements, P. C. Humphreys, B. J. Metcalf,et al., “Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers,” Optica 3, 1460–1465 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G. J. Milburn, “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,” Nature 409, 46–52 (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Opticalsimulationofquantumlogic,

    N.J.Cerf,C.Adami,andP.G.Kwiat,“Opticalsimulationofquantumlogic,”Phys.Rev.A 57,R1477–R1480(1998)

    1998

  44. [52]

    Probabilistic quantum logic operations using polarizing beam splitters,

    T. Pittman, B. Jacobs, and J. Franson, “Probabilistic quantum logic operations using polarizing beam splitters,” Phys. Rev. A64, 062311 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates,

    T. C. Ralph, A. G. White, W. J. Munro, and G. J. Milburn, “Simple scheme for efficient linear optics quantum gates,” Phys. Rev. A65, 012314 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Demonstration of nondeterministic quantum logic operations using linear optical elements,

    T. Pittman, B. Jacobs, and J. Franson, “Demonstration of nondeterministic quantum logic operations using linear optical elements,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 257902 (2002)

    2002

  47. [55]

    Quantumphasegateforphotonicqubitsusingonlybeamsplittersandpostselection,

    H.F.HofmannandS.Takeuchi,“Quantumphasegateforphotonicqubitsusingonlybeamsplittersandpostselection,” Phys. Rev. A66, 024308 (2002)

    2002

  48. [56]

    Linear optical controlled-not gate in the coincidence basis,

    T. C. Ralph, N. K. Langford, T. B. Bell, and A. G. White, “Linear optical controlled-not gate in the coincidence basis,” Phys. Rev. A65, 062324 (2002)

    2002

  49. [57]

    Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate,

    J. L. O’Brien, G. J. Pryde, A. G. White,et al., “Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate,” Nature 426, 264–267 (2003)

    2003

  50. [58]

    Realization of a photonic controlled-not gate sufficient for quantum computation,

    S. Gasparoni, J.-W. Pan, P. Walther,et al., “Realization of a photonic controlled-not gate sufficient for quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 020504 (2004)

    2004

  51. [59]

    Experimental demonstration of a nondestructive controlled-not quantum gate for two independent photon qubits,

    Z. Zhao, A.-N. Zhang, Y.-A. Chen,et al., “Experimental demonstration of a nondestructive controlled-not quantum gate for two independent photon qubits,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 030501 (2005)

    2005

  52. [60]

    Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation,

    D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, “Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010501 (2005)

    2005

  53. [61]

    Linear-optics quantum toffoli and fredkin gates,

    J. Fiurášek, “Linear-optics quantum toffoli and fredkin gates,” Phys. Rev. A73, 062313 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    Opticalnondestructivecontrolled-notgatewithoutusingentangledphotons,

    X.-H.Bao,T.-Y.Chen,Q.Zhang, etal.,“Opticalnondestructivecontrolled-notgatewithoutusingentangledphotons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 170502 (2007)

    2007

  55. [63]

    Realization of a knill-laflamme-milburn controlled-not photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities,

    R. Okamoto, J. L. O’Brien, H. F. Hofmann, and S. Takeuchi, “Realization of a knill-laflamme-milburn controlled-not photonic quantum circuit combining effective optical nonlinearities,” Proc. National Acad. Sci.108, 10067–10071 (2011)

    2011

  56. [64]

    Reconfigurable controlled two-qubit operation on a quantum photonic chip,

    H. Li, S. Przeslak, A. Niskanen,et al., “Reconfigurable controlled two-qubit operation on a quantum photonic chip,” New J. Phys.13, 115009 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources,

    J.-P. Li, X. Gu, J. Qin,et al., “Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 140501 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Controlled-not operation of sin-photonic circuit using photon pairs from silicon-photonic circuit,

    J.-M. Lee, W.-J. Lee, M.-S. Kim,et al., “Controlled-not operation of sin-photonic circuit using photon pairs from silicon-photonic circuit,” Opt. Commun.509, 127863 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    Universal quantum multi-qubit entangling gates with auxiliary spaces,

    W.-Q. Liu, H.-R. Wei, and L.-C. Kwek, “Universal quantum multi-qubit entangling gates with auxiliary spaces,” Adv. Quantum Technol.5, 2100136 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    Quantum fredkin and toffoli gates on a versatile programmable silicon photonic chip,

    Y. Li, L. Wan, H. Zhang,et al., “Quantum fredkin and toffoli gates on a versatile programmable silicon photonic chip,” npj Quantum Inf.8, 112 (2022)

    2022

  61. [69]

    On-chip path encoded photonic quantum toffoli gate,

    M. Li, C. Li, Y. Chen,et al., “On-chip path encoded photonic quantum toffoli gate,” Photonics Res.10, 1533–1542 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    Linear optical universal quantum gates with higher success probabilities,

    W.-Q. Liu and H.-R. Wei, “Linear optical universal quantum gates with higher success probabilities,” Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2300009 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    Quantum circuit mapping for universal and scalable computing in mzi-based integrated photonics,

    Y. Kwon, A. Baldazzi, L. Pavesi, and B.-S. Choi, “Quantum circuit mapping for universal and scalable computing in mzi-based integrated photonics,” Opt. Express32, 12852–12881 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Universal multiport interferometers for post-selected multi-photon gates,

    A. Baldazzi and L. Pavesi, “Universal multiport interferometers for post-selected multi-photon gates,” Adv. Quantum Technol. p. 2400418 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Photonic quantum technologies,

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, “Photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics3, 687–695 (2009)

    2009

  66. [74]

    Quantum computers,

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme,et al., “Quantum computers,” Nature464, 45–53 (2010)

    2010

  67. [75]

    High-fidelity operation of quantum photonic circuits,

    A. Laing, A. Peruzzo, A. Politi,et al., “High-fidelity operation of quantum photonic circuits,” Appl. Phys. Lett.97, 211109 (2010)

    2010

  68. [76]

    Universal linear optics,

    J. Carolan, C. Harrold, C. Sparrow,et al., “Universal linear optics,” Science349, 711–716 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    Quantum computational advantage using photons,

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng,et al., “Quantum computational advantage using photons,” Science370, 1460–1463 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,

    K. Alexander, A. Bahgat, A. Benyamini,et al., “A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing,” arXiv:2404.17570 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles,

    H. J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf, “Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 910 (2001)

    2001

  72. [80]

    A one-way quantum computer,

    R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel, “A one-way quantum computer,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 5188 (2001)

    2001

  73. [81]

    Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon,

    N. C. Harris, D. Bunandar, M. Pant,et al., “Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon,” Nanophotonics5, 456–468 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing,

    X. Qiang, X. Zhou, J. Wang,et al., “Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing,” Nat. photonics12, 534–539 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Siliconphotonicscircuitdesign: methods,toolsandchallenges,

    W.BogaertsandL.Chrostowski,“Siliconphotonicscircuitdesign: methods,toolsandchallenges,”Laser&Photonics Rev. 12, 1700237 (2018)

    2018

  76. [84]

    Programmable photonic circuits,

    W. Bogaerts, D. Pérez, J. Capmany,et al., “Programmable photonic circuits,” Nature586, 207–216 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics,

    J. Bao, Z. Fu, T. Pramanik,et al., “Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics,” Nat. Photonics (2023). Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s)

    2023

  78. [86]

    2022 roadmap on integrated quantum photonics,

    G. Moody, V. J. Sorger, D. J. Blumenthal,et al., “2022 roadmap on integrated quantum photonics,” J. Physics: Photonics 4, 012501 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet,

    L. W., C. L., S. Y.,et al., “Recent progress in quantum photonic chips for quantum communication and internet,” Light. Sci. & Appl.12, 175 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Aversatilesingle-photon-basedquantumcomputingplatform,

    N.Maring,A.Fyrillas,M.Pont, etal.,“Aversatilesingle-photon-basedquantumcomputingplatform,”Nat.Photonics 18, 603–609 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    Four-wave mixing in silicon wire waveguides,

    H. Fukuda, K. Yamada, T. Shoji,et al., “Four-wave mixing in silicon wire waveguides,” Opt. Express13, 4629–4637 (2005)

    2005

  82. [90]

    Continuous wave photon pair generation in silicon-on-insulator waveguides and ring resonators,

    S. Clemmen, K. P. Huy, W. Bogaerts,et al., “Continuous wave photon pair generation in silicon-on-insulator waveguides and ring resonators,” Opt. Express17, 16558–16570 (2009)

    2009

  83. [91]

    Spontaneous four-wave mixing in microring resonators,

    L. G. Helt, Z. Yang, M. Liscidini, and J. E. Sipe, “Spontaneous four-wave mixing in microring resonators,” Opt. Lett. 35, 3006–3008 (2010)

    2010

  84. [92]

    Ultra-low power generation of twin photons in a compact silicon ring resonator,

    S. Azzini, D. Grassani, M. J. Strain,et al., “Ultra-low power generation of twin photons in a compact silicon ring resonator,” Opt. Express20, 23100–23107 (2012)

    2012

  85. [93]

    Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement,

    E. Engin, D. Bonneau, C. M. Natarajan,et al., “Photon pair generation in a silicon micro-ring resonator with reverse bias enhancement,” Opt. express21, 27826–27834 (2013)

    2013

  86. [94]

    Degenerate four-wave-mixing as a low-power source of squeezed light,

    B. L. S. Marlow, “Degenerate four-wave-mixing as a low-power source of squeezed light,” Opt. Express28, 38169–38183 (2020)

    2020

  87. [95]

    Entangling macroscopic oscillators exploiting radiation pressure,

    S. Mancini, V. Giovannetti, D. Vitali, and P. Tombesi, “Entangling macroscopic oscillators exploiting radiation pressure,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2002)

    2002

  88. [96]

    Realization of the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox using momentum- and position-entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down conversion,

    J. C. Howell, R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, “Realization of the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox using momentum- and position-entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 210403 (2004)

    2004

  89. [97]

    Experimental demonstration of high two-photon time-energy entanglement,

    I. Ali Khan and J. C. Howell, “Experimental demonstration of high two-photon time-energy entanglement,” Phys. Rev. A73, 031801 (2006)

    2006

  90. [98]

    Grating couplers on silicon photonics: Design principles, emerging trends and practical issues,

    L. Cheng, S. Mao, Z. Li,et al., “Grating couplers on silicon photonics: Design principles, emerging trends and practical issues,” Micromachines11, 666 (2020)

    2020

  91. [99]

    Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: principles and applications,

    L. Soldano and E. C. M. Pennings, “Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: principles and applications,” J. Light. Technol.13, 615–627 (1995)

    1995

  92. [100]

    Low-loss multimode-interference-based crossings for silicon wire waveguides,

    H. Chen and A. W. Poon, “Low-loss multimode-interference-based crossings for silicon wire waveguides,” IEEE photonics technology letters18, 2260–2262 (2006)

    2006

  93. [101]

    Efficient, compact and low loss thermo-optic phase shifter in silicon,

    N. C. Harris, Y. Ma, J. Mower,et al., “Efficient, compact and low loss thermo-optic phase shifter in silicon,” Opt. Express 22, 10487–10493 (2014)

    2014

  94. [102]

    Optimization of thermo-optic phase-shifter design and mitigation of thermal crosstalk on the soi platform,

    M. Jacques, A. Samani, E. El-Fiky,et al., “Optimization of thermo-optic phase-shifter design and mitigation of thermal crosstalk on the soi platform,” Opt. Express27, 10456–10471 (2019)

    2019

  95. [103]

    Indistinguishable photons,

    N. Lal, S. Mishra, and R. P. Singh, “Indistinguishable photons,” AVS Quantum Sci.4, 021701 (2022)

    2022

  96. [104]

    Dodifferentkindsofphoton-pairsourceshavethesameindistinguishability in quantum silicon photonics?

    J.-M.Lee,A.Baldazzi,M.Sanna, etal.,“Dodifferentkindsofphoton-pairsourceshavethesameindistinguishability in quantum silicon photonics?” Photonics Res.11, 1820 (2023)

    2023

  97. [105]

    Modelling, characterization, and applications of silicon on insulator loop terminated asymmetric mach zehnder interferometer,

    R. S. El Shamy, A. E. Afifi, M. M. Badr, and M. A. Swillam, “Modelling, characterization, and applications of silicon on insulator loop terminated asymmetric mach zehnder interferometer,” Sci. Reports12, 3598 (2022)

    2022

  98. [106]

    Quantum-statepreparationwithuniversalgatedecompositions,

    M.PleschandC.Brukner,“Quantum-statepreparationwithuniversalgatedecompositions,”Phys.Rev.A 83(2011)

    2011

  99. [107]

    Universal quantum circuit for two-qubit transformations with three controlled-not gates,

    G. Vidal and C. M. Dawson, “Universal quantum circuit for two-qubit transformations with three controlled-not gates,” Phys. Rev. A69(2004)

    2004

  100. [108]

    Structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems,

    M. Huber and J. I. de Vicente, “Structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013)

    2013

  101. [109]

    On-chip quantuminterference between silicon photon-pair sources,

    J. W. Silverstone, D. Bonneau, K. Ohira,etal., “On-chip quantuminterference between silicon photon-pair sources,” Nat. Photonics8, 104–108 (2013)

    2013

  102. [110]

    On-chip quantum interference with heralded photons from two independent micro-ring resonator sources in silicon photonics,

    I. I. Faruque, G. F. Sinclair, D. Bonneau,et al., “On-chip quantum interference with heralded photons from two independent micro-ring resonator sources in silicon photonics,” Opt. Express26, 20379 (2018)

    2018

  103. [111]

    Truly unentangled photon pairs without spectral filtering,

    Z. Vernon, M. Menotti, C. C. Tison,et al., “Truly unentangled photon pairs without spectral filtering,” Opt. Lett.42, 3638 (2017)

    2017

  104. [112]

    On-chip heralded single photon sources,

    S. Signorini and L. Pavesi, “On-chip heralded single photon sources,” AVS Quantum Sci.2, 041701 (2020)

    2020

  105. [113]

    Near-ideal spontaneous photon sources in silicon quantum photonics,

    S. Paesani, M. Borghi, S. Signorini,et al., “Near-ideal spontaneous photon sources in silicon quantum photonics,” Nat. Commun.11(2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    PSI41.4: Open-sourcesoftwareforhigh-throughputquantum chemistry,

    D.G.A.Smith,L.A.Burns,A.C.Simmonett, etal.,“PSI41.4: Open-sourcesoftwareforhigh-throughputquantum chemistry,” The J. Chem. Phys.152, 184108 (2020)

    2020

  107. [115]

    Helgaker, P

    T. Helgaker, P. Jorgensen, and J. Olsen,Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory(Wiley, 2014)

    2014

  108. [116]

    Small gaussian expansions of slater-type orbitals,

    R. F. Stewart, “Small gaussian expansions of slater-type orbitals,” The J. Chem. Phys.52, 431–438 (1970)

    1970

  109. [117]

    Quantum computational chemistry,

    S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik,et al., “Quantum computational chemistry,” Rev. Mod. Phys.92 (2020)

    2020

  110. [118]

    A unitary multiconfigurational coupled-cluster method: Theory and applications,

    M. R. Hoffmann and J. Simons, “A unitary multiconfigurational coupled-cluster method: Theory and applications,” The J. chemical physics88, 993–1002 (1988)

    1988

  111. [119]

    Alternative coupled-cluster ansätze ii. the unitary coupled-cluster method,

    R. J. Bartlett, S. A. Kucharski, and J. Noga, “Alternative coupled-cluster ansätze ii. the unitary coupled-cluster method,” Chem. physics letters155, 133–140 (1989)

    1989

  112. [120]

    Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz,

    J. Romero, R. Babbush, J. R. McClean,et al., “Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz,” Quantum Sci. Technol.4, 014008 (2018)

    2018

  113. [121]

    Theelectronicstructureofthehydrogenmolecule: Atutorialexercise in classical and quantum computation,

    V.Graves, C.Sünderhauf, N.S.Blunt, etal., “Theelectronicstructureofthehydrogenmolecule: Atutorialexercise in classical and quantum computation,” arXiv:2307.04290 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex optimization(Cambridge university press, 2004)

    2004

  115. [123]

    D. J. C. MacKay,Information Theory, Inference & Learning Algorithms(Cambridge University Press, USA, 2002)

    2002

  116. [124]

    Garnett,Bayesian Optimization(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    R. Garnett,Bayesian Optimization(Cambridge University Press, 2023)

    2023

  117. [125]

    Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems,

    W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, J. J. Bollinger,et al., “Quantum projection noise: Population fluctuations in two-level systems,” Phys. Rev. A47, 3554–3570 (1993)

    1993

  118. [126]

    Challenges of variational quantum optimization with measurement shot noise,

    G. Scriva, N. Astrakhantsev, S. Pilati, and G. Mazzola, “Challenges of variational quantum optimization with measurement shot noise,” Phys. Rev. A109 (2024)

    2024

  119. [127]

    Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware,

    M. Schuld, V. Bergholm, C. Gogolin,et al., “Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware,” Phys. Rev. A99, 032331 (2019)

    2019

  120. [128]

    Hybrid quantum-classical approach to quantum optimal control,

    J. Li, X. Yang, X. Peng, and C.-P. Sun, “Hybrid quantum-classical approach to quantum optimal control,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 150503 (2017)

    2017

  121. [129]

    Variational approach to photonic quantum circuits via the parameter shift rule,

    F. Hoch, G. Rodari, T. Giordani,et al., “Variational approach to photonic quantum circuits via the parameter shift rule,” arXiv:2410.06966 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  122. [130]

    A photonic parameter-shift rule: Enabling gradient computation for photonic quantum computers,

    A. Pappalardo, P.-E. Emeriau, G. de Felice,et al., “A photonic parameter-shift rule: Enabling gradient computation for photonic quantum computers,” arXiv:2410.02726 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Noisy Bayesian optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers,

    G. Iannelli and K. Jansen, “Noisy Bayesian optimization for variational quantum eigensolvers,” inProceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021),vol. 396 (2022), p. 251

    2022

  124. [132]

    The bayesian approach to global optimization,

    J. Mockus, “The bayesian approach to global optimization,” inSystem Modeling and Optimization: Proceedings of the 10th IFIP Conference New York City, USA, August 31–September 4, 1981,(Springer, 2005), pp. 473–481

    1981

  125. [133]

    Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics,

    J. Bao, Z. Fu, T. Pramanik,et al., “Very-large-scale integrated quantum graph photonics,” Nat. Photonics17, 573–581 (2023)

    2023

  126. [134]

    Modular architectures for quantum networks,

    A. Pirker, J. Wallnöfer, and W. Dür, “Modular architectures for quantum networks,” New J. Phys.20, 053054 (2018)

    2018

  127. [135]

    Fusion-based quantum computation,

    S. Bartolucci, P. Birchall, H. Bombín,et al., “Fusion-based quantum computation,” Nat. Commun.14, 912 (2023)

    2023

  128. [136]

    Simulating molecules using the vqe algorithm on qiskit,

    A. Anaya and F. Delgado, “Simulating molecules using the vqe algorithm on qiskit,” arXiv:2201.04216 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Benchmarking the variational quantum eigensolver usingdifferentquantumhardware,

    A. Bentellis, A. Matic-Flierl, C. B. Mendl, and J. M. Lorenz, “Benchmarking the variational quantum eigensolver usingdifferentquantumhardware,” in 2023IEEEInternationalConferenceonQuantumComputingandEngineering (QCE), vol. 01 (2023), pp. 518–523

    2023

  130. [138]

    Error-mitigated photonic variational quantum eigensolver using a single-photon ququart,

    D. Lee, J. Lee, S. Hong,et al., “Error-mitigated photonic variational quantum eigensolver using a single-photon ququart,” Optica9, 88–95 (2022)

    2022

  131. [139]

    Photonic variational quantum eigensolver using entanglement measurements,

    J. Lee, W. Song, D. Lee,et al., “Photonic variational quantum eigensolver using entanglement measurements,” Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 045028 (2024)

    2024

  132. [140]

    Squeezed light,

    A. I. Lvovsky, “Squeezed light,” inPhotonics: Scientific Foundations, Technology and Applications,D. L. Andrews, ed. (Wiley, 2015), chap. 5, pp. 121–163

    2015

  133. [141]

    A pedestrian introduction to coherent and squeezed states,

    B. Bagchi, R. Ghosh, and A. Khare, “A pedestrian introduction to coherent and squeezed states,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35, 2030011 (2020)

    2020

  134. [142]

    Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: a tutorial,

    N. Quesada, L. G. Helt, M. Menotti,et al., “Beyond photon pairs—nonlinear quantum photonics in the high-gain regime: a tutorial,” Adv. Opt. Photonics14, 291 (2022)

    2022

  135. [143]

    Effect of loss on multiplexed single-photon sources,

    D. Bonneau, G. J. Mendoza, J. L. O’Brien, and M. G. Thompson, “Effect of loss on multiplexed single-photon sources,” New J. Phys.17, 043057 (2015)

    2015

  136. [144]

    Joint spectral characterization of photon-pair sources,

    K. Zielnicki, K. Garay-Palmett, D. Cruz-Delgado,et al., “Joint spectral characterization of photon-pair sources,” J. Mod. Opt.65, 1141–1160 (2018)

    2018

  137. [145]

    Reconfigurable silicon photonic chip for the generation of frequency-bin-entangled qudits,

    M. Borghi, N. Tagliavacche, F. A. Sabattoli,et al., “Reconfigurable silicon photonic chip for the generation of frequency-bin-entangled qudits,” Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 064026 (2023)

    2023

  138. [146]

    Measuring the photon distribution with on/off photodetectors,

    M. Genovese, M. Gramegna, G. Brida,et al., “Measuring the photon distribution with on/off photodetectors,” Laser physics 16, 385–392 (2006)

    2006

  139. [147]

    How does it scale? comparing quantum and classical nonlinear optical processes in integrated devices,

    L. G. Helt, M. Liscidini, and J. E. Sipe, “How does it scale? comparing quantum and classical nonlinear optical processes in integrated devices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B29, 2199–2212 (2012)

    2012

  140. [148]

    Observation of a “quantum eraser

    P. G. Kwiat, A. M. Steinberg, and R. Y. Chiao, “Observation of a “quantum eraser”: A revival of coherence in a two-photon interference experiment,” Phys. Rev. A45, 7729–7739 (1992)

    1992

  141. [149]

    Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics,

    S. Shekhar, W. Bogaerts, L. Chrostowski,et al., “Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics,” Nat. Commun. 15, 751 (2024)

    2024

  142. [150]

    Minimum dimension of a hilbert space needed to generate a quantum correlation,

    J. Sikora, A. Varvitsiotis, and Z. Wei, “Minimum dimension of a hilbert space needed to generate a quantum correlation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016)

    2016

  143. [151]

    Uber das paulische äquivalenzverbot,

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, “Uber das paulische äquivalenzverbot,” Zeitschrift für Physik (1928)

    1928

  144. [152]

    110 ofUNITEXT: La Matematica per il 3+2(Springer, 2013), 2nd ed

    V.Moretti, SpectralTheoryandQuantumMechanics: MathematicalFoundationsofQuantumTheories,Symmetries and Introduction to the Algebraic Formulation, vol. 110 ofUNITEXT: La Matematica per il 3+2(Springer, 2013), 2nd ed

    2013

  145. [153]

    Elementary prediction of linear combination of atomic orbitals matrix elements,

    S. Froyen and W. A. Harrison, “Elementary prediction of linear combination of atomic orbitals matrix elements,” Phys. Rev. B20, 2420 (1979)

    1979

  146. [154]

    Ching and P

    W.-Y. Ching and P. Rulis,Electronic Structure Methods for Complex Materials: The orthogonalized linear combination of atomic orbitals(OUP Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  147. [155]

    Szabo and N

    A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund,Modern quantum chemistry: introduction to advanced electronic structure theory (Courier Corporation, 1996)

    1996

  148. [156]

    The electronic hamiltonian in an electromagnetic field,

    T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen, “The electronic hamiltonian in an electromagnetic field,” (2014)

    2014

  149. [157]

    The bravyi-kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure,

    J. T. Seeley, M. J. Richard, and P. J. Love, “The bravyi-kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure,” The J. chemical physics137 (2012)

    2012

  150. [158]

    Fermionic quantum computation,

    S. B. Bravyi and A. Y. Kitaev, “Fermionic quantum computation,” Ann. Phys.298, 210–226 (2002)

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.