Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explanatory Debiasing: Involving Domain Experts in the Data Generation Process to Mitigate Representation Bias in AI Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.01441 v2 pith:QOG4L5ZT submitted 2024-12-26 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords debiasingdomainexpertsrepresentationbiasguidelinesinvolvingprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Representation bias is one of the most common types of biases in artificial intelligence (AI) systems, causing AI models to perform poorly on underrepresented data segments. Although AI practitioners use various methods to reduce representation bias, their effectiveness is often constrained by insufficient domain knowledge in the debiasing process. To address this gap, this paper introduces a set of generic design guidelines for effectively involving domain experts in representation debiasing. We instantiated our proposed guidelines in a healthcare-focused application and evaluated them through a comprehensive mixed-methods user study with 35 healthcare experts. Our findings show that involving domain experts can reduce representation bias without compromising model accuracy. Based on our findings, we also offer recommendations for developers to build robust debiasing systems guided by our generic design guidelines, ensuring more effective inclusion of domain experts in the debiasing process.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Visual-Conversational Interface for Evidence-Based Explanation of Diabetes Risk Prediction

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A visual-conversational diabetes risk tool grounded in scientific evidence was rated by 30 healthcare professionals as improving understanding and calibrating trust.

  2. Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Healthcare experts who manually adjusted training data improved a diabetes prediction model more than those using automated corrections, without losing trust or understanding.

Pith tools