Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

SAFER: Sharpness Aware layer-selective Finetuning for Enhanced Robustness in vision transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.01529 v1 pith:D33YRU2S submitted 2025-01-02 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords adversarialvitsoverfittingvisionaccuracycleanlayer-selectivelayers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision transformers (ViTs) have become essential backbones in advanced computer vision applications and multi-modal foundation models. Despite their strengths, ViTs remain vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, comparable to or even exceeding the vulnerability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Furthermore, the large parameter count and complex architecture of ViTs make them particularly prone to adversarial overfitting, often compromising both clean and adversarial accuracy. This paper mitigates adversarial overfitting in ViTs through a novel, layer-selective fine-tuning approach: SAFER. Instead of optimizing the entire model, we identify and selectively fine-tune a small subset of layers most susceptible to overfitting, applying sharpness-aware minimization to these layers while freezing the rest of the model. Our method consistently enhances both clean and adversarial accuracy over baseline approaches. Typical improvements are around 5%, with some cases achieving gains as high as 20% across various ViT architectures and datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Fast Methods Stable in Adversarially Robust Transfer Learning?

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FGSM adversarial fine-tuning avoids catastrophic overfitting at standard eps=4 and 8 and matches PGD robustness within 1.4% at a quarter of the training time.

Pith tools