Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 58 references

D$^3$-Human: Dynamic Disentangled Digital Human from Monocular Video

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A monocular video of a moving person can produce separate, editable clothing and body geometry, segmented by a signed field on the body surface using only 2D parsing masks, without 3D clothing priors.

desk verdict A genuine new representation for decoupled avatar reconstruction, with an evaluation that is thinner than the claims and an aggregation step that needs hard cases tested, but worth serious peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01589 v1 pith:JRK4WN43 submitted 2025-01-03 cs.CV cs.GR

Honghu Chen , Bo Peng , Yunfan Tao , Juyong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.GR
keywords monocularvideoreconstructiondisentangledclothingandbodyhumanmanifoldsigneddistancefieldDMTetSMPLdifferentiablerenderingtransferdynamicdigital
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

D3-Human aims to prove that monocular video alone is enough to reconstruct a clothed person as two separate layers: clothing and underlying body, which can later be reanimated or swapped. Its central proposal is the human manifold signed distance field (hmSDF), defined on the watertight surface of the clothed body, whose sign marks whether a point belongs to skin or garment. The field is supervised only by per-frame 2D human-parsing masks plus standard image and normal cues, so the method does not need 3D garment templates. If this works as claimed, a common phone video becomes a starting point for editable digital avatars, clothing transfer, and physics-based animation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the human manifold signed distance field (hmSDF): a scalar field $\nu$ defined on the reconstructed clothed human surface, negative on visible body, positive on clothing, and zero on the boundary curve between them. It is optimized on a DMTet tetrahedral grid whose mesh is extracted with GShell-style surface extraction; region aggregation then assigns connected components to body or clothing based on vertex counts and the known numbers of components $\alpha_1$ and $\alpha_2$. Separate skinning and non-rigid MLP deformation fields for clothing and body, plus occlusion-aware rasterization of labeled faces, carry the dynamic part of the reconstruction.

What would settle it

Run the pipeline on a monocular video of a person wearing an open jacket or open coat where skin is visible through the opening, and compare the reconstructed clothing and body meshes against ground truth from a garment-simulation pipeline. If the method still forces a closed watertight boundary between clothing and body, or if the body mesh incorrectly includes the jacket's front panels, the closed-curve assumption is violated. Quantitatively, the clothing/body Chamfer distance on such sequences should remain comparable to closed-garment cases; a large degradation would falsify the core claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that clothing/body separation can be performed on the visible geometry itself. After reconstructing the whole clothed surface with a hybrid DMTet representation, the paper defines a scalar field $\nu$ on that surface with negative values on the visible body, positive values on clothing, and zero on the boundary curves between them. Because a watertight clothed human is assumed to be partitionable by closed curves, optimizing $\nu$ with mask supervision yields two closed meshes. A region-aggregation step repairs 2D parsing mistakes by counting connected components and merging small fragments into the other category. The invisible body is completed from a parametric body model and merged with the visible body, and separate non-rigid deformation fields animate clothing and body independently. The paper states that this is the first monocular-video method to reconstruct clothing geometry without any 3D clothing priors.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline assumes the clothed body's surface is watertight and that the clothing/body boundary is a set of closed curves, and it assumes mislabeled parsing regions are small enough that the vertex-count merging step can reassign them; if a garment has no closed boundary or a large parsing error occurs, the decoupled templates will be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The reconstructed clothing and body meshes can be exchanged between two people reconstructed separately, enabling clothing transfer without retraining or template fitting.
  • The decoupled layers can be fed into a physics-based cloth simulator so the garment and body move with different deformation rules, making the output usable for animation production.
  • Because segmentation uses only 2D parsing masks, the method can handle garment styles not represented in any 3D template library, and the decoupled template is produced in roughly 20 minutes rather than a day.
  • Quantitative results on synthetic ground-truth sequences indicate the method improves Chamfer distance for the full clothed body and for the clothing and body layers separately compared with the listed baselines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same closed-boundary segmentation idea could transfer to other layered objects with watertight outer surfaces and 2D semantic masks, such as animals with harnesses or people carrying bags.
  • The biggest untested regime is open garments: because the method requires the clothing/body partition to be bounded by closed curves, an open jacket or unbuttoned shirt would force hmSDF to invent a boundary where none exists; a natural stress test is to measure segmentation error as a function of how open the garment is.
  • Since invisible-body geometry comes from a parametric body model, the method's invisible-body quality cannot exceed the shape space of that prior; a learned, video-specific body prior would be a direct extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes D3-Human, a monocular-video reconstruction method that outputs separate clothing and body meshes. The pipeline first reconstructs the visible clothed surface as a neural SDF on a DMTet tetrahedral grid, introduces a human manifold signed distance field (hmSDF) whose sign separates clothing from body using 2D human-parsing masks, repairs small segmentation fragments by connected-component aggregation (Algorithm 1), and completes the invisible body with SMPL. Two MLPs model non-rigid clothing/body deformations with a shared LBS deformation, and an occlusion-aware rasterizer is used for supervision. Experiments report Chamfer distances against REC-MV, BCNet, DELTA, SelfRecon, and GoMAvatar on four synthetic SelfRecon sequences, with qualitative real-sequence comparisons and applications in physics-based animation and clothing transfer.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a useful advance: it is among the first monocular pipelines to directly output separately editable clothing and body meshes without a 3D garment template, and the hmSDF formulation on the reconstructed clothed surface is an interesting alternative to UDF-based clothing modeling. The paper is largely self-contained, gives the key loss definitions and an explicit algorithm for segmentation repair, and reports consistently lower Chamfer distances than the cited baselines on four synthetic sequences. The main caveats are that the evaluation is narrow (four synthetic sequences, no error bars, no real geometric ground truth) and that the segmentation repair assumes a topological correspondence between 2D mask components and 3D surface components that is not guaranteed for general clothing and occlusion. These caveats do not invalidate the idea, but they mean the central generalization claim needs further support.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Algorithm 1] The region-aggregation procedure takes α1 and α2 as 'the correct number of subgraphs' for Sb and Sc and states that these are obtained 'from the input image,' but no method is given for computing them over a video, and the procedure is only correct if the number of 2D connected components of each class in the parsing mask equals the number of 3D surface components of that class. Occlusion can violate this equality: a single 3D garment can appear as several 2D components (e.g., a dress occluded by an arm), and separate garments that touch in the image can appear as one. In such cases Algorithm 1 will misclassify whole components rather than the small fragments it is designed to remove. Since this step is the mechanism that turns hmSDF into the claimed clothing/body decomposition, the central claim is not yet established for general monocular sequences. The authors should specify how α1 and α2 are aggregated across frames, state the underlying topological assumptions, and evaluate multi-piece garments and heavily occluded clothing.
  2. [Section 3.1] The hmSDF definition assumes that the surface of the watertight clothed human is partitioned into clothing and body by closed curves, so ν has a consistent sign on each region. Open garments (e.g., an unzipped jacket or a loose cardigan) do not necessarily have such a closed boundary curve, and a garment like a scarf or an open coat can create multiple boundaries with the body. The paper lists 'various clothing styles' as a target but provides no failure analysis or experiment for such cases. Please state this topological restriction explicitly and add at least one failure-mode or stress-test experiment, or restrict the generality claims accordingly.
  3. [Table 1 and Section 4.3] The quantitative evaluation consists of four synthetic SelfRecon sequences with a single run per method and no error bars, and the only ablation evidence for the central design choice (UDF vs. hmSDF, and the perceptual normal loss) is qualitative. There is no real-world geometric evaluation despite the paper's emphasis on monocular video and 'real captured videos' in the introduction. This is not by itself a correctness error, but it is disproportionate to the strength of the abstract's claim that the method 'can accurately segment 3D clothing and body' across different clothing. Please add a statistical summary (multiple runs or bootstrap over frames), at least one quantitative ablation for segmentation accuracy, and, if possible, a real or more varied synthetic benchmark that includes multi-piece clothing.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1] The unit specification 'The unit is e−3' is ambiguous; with cm as the stated unit, values like 1.065 would be implausibly small if they are meant to be multiplied by 10^-3. Please clarify whether the reported numbers are already in cm or should be read as 10^-3 cm.
  2. [Algorithm 1] The phrase 'filter out duplicate points' is vague; please specify whether the merge operation is a set union of vertices followed by mesh cleanup, or something else, and define what 'correct number of subgraphs' means formally.
  3. [Section 3.5.3, Eq. (8)] The 'Regularize Holes' loss is described as preventing excessively large openings, but the formula encourages ν(u) to move from 0 to ε1 for boundary points; please clarify the sign convention or the intended direction of this regularizer.
  4. [Introduction and Section 3] There are several English and formatting issues throughout, such as 'We combine' with an uppercase W in the middle of a sentence in Section 3, and inconsistent capitalization of 'HmSDF' in Figure 2 versus 'hmSDF' in the text. A careful proofread would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: hmSDF segmentation is supervised by 2D parsing and evaluated against external 3D ground truth; minor self-citations and an unvalidated topological assumption do not create a derivation loop.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The claimed result—that 2D human parsing masks can drive a 3D clothing/body separation via hmSDF—is a supervised reconstruction: the scalar field ν is optimized against RGB, mask, and normal losses (Eqs. 3–8), and the resulting meshes are evaluated against CLO3D/SelfRecon 3D ground truth, not against the same 2D masks used for supervision. The invisible-body region is completed using the SMPL prior, which is an external parametric model rather than a parameter fitted to the evaluation target, so the body metric is not the fit renamed as a prediction. Algorithm 1's α1 and α2, described as 'the correct number of subgraphs for Sb and Sc,' do encode a topological target, and the claim that these counts are 'obtained from the input image' is an unvalidated assumption for occluded or multi-piece garments; however, the algorithm's output is not definitionally equal to its input—component identities and geometry still come from the learned hmSDF and size-based sorting, so this is a robustness/correctness gap rather than a circular reduction. The paper cites several works from the same group (SelfRecon, BCNet, Neural-ABC) and uses SelfRecon synthetic data for quantitative evaluation, but those are not load-bearing for the core derivation, and the method is also compared against external baselines on PeopleSnapshot. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on modeling assumptions about masks, SMPL, and surface topology, plus hand-set regularization thresholds. There are no invented physical entities.

free parameters (6)
  • epsilon_1 (hole target in Eq. 8)
    Hand-chosen positive scalar; no value or sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • epsilon_2 (collision distance in Eq. 9) = 0.005
    Chosen by hand to avoid rendering artifacts when clothing and body layers are too close.
  • kcollision (collision penalty weight)
    Coefficient of the cubic penetration penalty; the paper does not report its value or tuning.
  • alpha_1 and alpha_2 (true component counts)
    Algorithm 1 requires the true number of body and clothing connected components as input, inferred from 2D images; wrong counts break the aggregation.
  • per-frame latent codes h_t
    Latent codes conditioning the non-rigid deformation MLPs are optimized per frame; no regularization scale is given.
  • loss weights for color, mask, perceptual, eikonal, and regularizers
    Relative weighting of the objective terms is not reported, so the training configuration is under-specified.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Clothed human surface is watertight and segmentable by closed curves.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 when defining hmSDF on S_eta = S_b union S_c with boundary lambda; open garments or ambiguous boundaries would violate the closed-curve assumption.
  • domain assumption 2D human parsing masks are reliable after aggregation.
    The method supervises 3D segmentation with SAM2/human parsing masks; errors directly corrupt hmSDF and the mask loss in Eq. 4.
  • domain assumption SMPL provides a plausible invisible body.
    Invisible body regions are filled from SMPL (Sections 3.1 and 3.3); if the true body under clothing deviates from SMPL, the body mesh is wrong in occluded areas by construction.
  • domain assumption Sapiens normal predictions are accurate ground truth.
    The perceptual normal loss in Eq. 5 treats Sapiens normals as supervision; systematic normal errors would bias the reconstructed geometry.
  • domain assumption SelfRecon synthetic data with CLO3D separation is valid ground truth.
    Quantitative evaluation uses four synthetic SelfRecon sequences and CLO3D garment/body separation; if the ground truth separation is imprecise or biased toward SMPL, reported Chamfer distances are optimistic.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of D$^3$-Human: Dynamic Disentangled Digital Human from Monocular Video." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRK4WN43

@misc{pith2026250101589,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: D$^3$-Human: Dynamic Disentangled Digital Human from Monocular Video},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRK4WN43}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01589}
}
abstract

We introduce D$^3$-Human, a method for reconstructing Dynamic Disentangled Digital Human geometry from monocular videos. Past monocular video human reconstruction primarily focuses on reconstructing undecoupled clothed human bodies or only reconstructing clothing, making it difficult to apply directly in applications such as animation production. The challenge in reconstructing decoupled clothing and body lies in the occlusion caused by clothing over the body. To this end, the details of the visible area and the plausibility of the invisible area must be ensured during the reconstruction process. Our proposed method combines explicit and implicit representations to model the decoupled clothed human body, leveraging the robustness of explicit representations and the flexibility of implicit representations. Specifically, we reconstruct the visible region as SDF and propose a novel human manifold signed distance field (hmSDF) to segment the visible clothing and visible body, and then merge the visible and invisible body. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that, compared with existing reconstruction schemes, D$^3$-Human can achieve high-quality decoupled reconstruction of the human body wearing different clothing, and can be directly applied to clothing transfer and animation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01589 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. D3 -Human can (b) reconstruct disentangled clothing and body from (a) input video, enabling (c) animation and (d) clothing transfer after reconstruction. Project page: https://ustc3dv.github.io/D3Human/. Abstract We introduce D3 -Human, a method for reconstructing Dynamic Disentangled Digital Human geometry from monocular videos. Past monocular video human recon￾struction primarily focuses on reconstructing undecoup… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of D3 -Human. The optimization process is divided into two steps: template generation and detailed deformation. The object is initialized as a DMTet [52] representation, and is optimized to form a complete clothed human. An optimizable HmSDF function separates the clothing and body regions, with missing parts filled by SMPL. After generating the disentangled template, we use two MLPs to model detailed defor… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of region aggregation. For the correct seg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Occlusion display of the mask. From left to right: the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quantitative comparison of the proposed method with REC-MV [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation study on normal loss. The reference input in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Qualitative comparison. Comparison of our method with other methods on real image sequences. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Decoupled reconstruction applications. Reconstructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Accessed: 2024-11

    Clo3d, 2024. Accessed: 2024-11. 6

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Video based reconstruc- tion of 3d people models

    Thiemo Alldieck, Marcus Magnor, Weipeng Xu, Christian Theobalt, and Gerard Pons-Moll. Video based reconstruc- tion of 3d people models. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018. 2, 3, 6, 7

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Tex2shape: Detailed full human body geometry from a single image

    Thiemo Alldieck, Gerard Pons-Moll, Christian Theobalt, and Marcus Magnor. Tex2shape: Detailed full human body geometry from a single image. International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019. 2

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Scape: shape completion and animation of people

    Dragomir Anguelov, Praveen Srinivasan, Daphne Koller, Se- bastian Thrun, Jim Rodgers, and James Davis. Scape: shape completion and animation of people. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 24:408–416, 2005. 2

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Neural-abc: Neural parametric models for articulated body with clothes

    Honghu Chen, Yuxin Yao, and Juyong Zhang. Neural-abc: Neural parametric models for articulated body with clothes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics,

    work page

  6. [6]

    gdna: Towards generative detailed neural avatars

    Xu Chen, Tianjian Jiang, Jie Song, Jinlong Yang, Michael J Black, Andreas Geiger, and Otmar Hilliges. gdna: Towards generative detailed neural avatars. In IEEE Conf. on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    SMPLicit: Topology-aware generative model for clothed people

    Enric Corona, Albert Pumarola, Guillem Aleny `a, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Francesc Moreno-Noguer. SMPLicit: Topology-aware generative model for clothed people. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    DrapeNet: Garment Generation and Self- Supervised Draping

    Luca De Luigi, Ren Li, Benoit Guillard, Mathieu Salzmann, and Pascal Fua. DrapeNet: Garment Generation and Self- Supervised Draping. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 2, 7

    work page 2023

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Black, and Timo Bolkart

    Yao Feng, Jinlong Yang, Marc Pollefeys, Michael J. Black, and Timo Bolkart. Capturing and animation of body and clothing from monocular video. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers, 2022. 2, 3, 6

    2022

  2. [10]

    Yao Feng, Weiyang Liu, Timo Bolkart, Jinlong Yang, Marc Pollefeys, and Michael J. Black. Learning disentangled avatars with hybrid 3d representations. arXiv, 2023. 6, 7

    2023

  3. [11]

    Black, and Otmar Hilliges

    Artur Grigorev, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Michael J. Black, and Otmar Hilliges. HOOD: Hierarchical graphs for gener- alized modelling of clothing dynamics. 2023. 5, 6, 9

    2023

  4. [12]

    Implicit geometric regularization for learning shapes

    Amos Gropp, Lior Yariv, Niv Haim, Matan Atzmon, and Yaron Lipman. Implicit geometric regularization for learning shapes. In Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems 2020, pages 3569–3579. 2020. 6

    2020

  5. [13]

    Meshudf: Fast and differentiable meshing of unsigned distance field networks

    Benoit Guillard, Federico Stella, and Pascal Fua. Meshudf: Fast and differentiable meshing of unsigned distance field networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision ,

  6. [14]

    Vid2avatar: 3d avatar reconstruction from videos in the wild via self-supervised scene decomposition

    Chen Guo, Tianjian Jiang, Xu Chen, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. Vid2avatar: 3d avatar reconstruction from videos in the wild via self-supervised scene decomposition. In Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  7. [15]

    Livecap: Real-time hu- man performance capture from monocular video

    Marc Habermann, Weipeng Xu, Michael Zollh ¨ofer, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Christian Theobalt. Livecap: Real-time hu- man performance capture from monocular video. 2019. 2, 3

    2019

  8. [16]

    Deepcap: Monoc- ular human performance capture using weak supervision

    Marc Habermann, Weipeng Xu, Michael Zollhoefer, Ger- ard Pons-Moll, and Christian Theobalt. Deepcap: Monoc- ular human performance capture using weak supervision. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion (CVPR). IEEE, 2020. 2, 3

    2020

  9. [17]

    Shape, Light, and Material Decomposition from Im- ages using Monte Carlo Rendering and Denoising

    Jon Hasselgren, Nikolai Hofmann, and Jacob Munkberg. Shape, Light, and Material Decomposition from Im- ages using Monte Carlo Rendering and Denoising. arXiv:2206.03380, 2022. 5

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Headnerf: A real-time nerf-based parametric head model

    Yang Hong, Bo Peng, Haiyao Xiao, Ligang Liu, and Juyong Zhang. Headnerf: A real-time nerf-based parametric head model. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022. 6

    2022

  11. [19]

    Bcnet: Learning body and cloth shape from a single image

    Boyi Jiang, Juyong Zhang, Yang Hong, Jinhao Luo, Ligang Liu, and Hujun Bao. Bcnet: Learning body and cloth shape from a single image. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pages 18–35. Springer, 2020. 2, 6, 7

    2020

  12. [20]

    Sel- frecon: Self reconstruction your digital avatar from monocu- lar video

    Boyi Jiang, Yang Hong, Hujun Bao, and Juyong Zhang. Sel- frecon: Self reconstruction your digital avatar from monocu- lar video. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022. 2, 3, 6, 7, 9

    2022

  13. [21]

    In- stantavatar: Learning avatars from monocular video in 60 seconds

    Tianjian Jiang, Xu Chen, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. In- stantavatar: Learning avatars from monocular video in 60 seconds. 2023. 7

    2023

  14. [22]

    Neuman: Neural human radiance field from a single video

    Wei Jiang, Kwang Moo Yi, Golnoosh Samei, Oncel Tuzel, and Anurag Ranjan. Neuman: Neural human radiance field from a single video. In Proceedings of the European confer- ence on computer vision (ECCV), 2022. 2, 3

    2022

  15. [23]

    Percep- tual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution

    Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. Percep- tual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Confer- ence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pages 694–711. Springer, 2016. 6

    2016

  16. [24]

    End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose

    Angjoo Kanazawa, Michael J Black, David W Jacobs, and Jitendra Malik. End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose. In CVPR, pages 7122–7131, 2018. 2

    2018

  17. [25]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42 (4), 2023. 3

    2023

  18. [26]

    Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els

    Rawal Khirodkar, Timur Bagautdinov, Julieta Martinez, Su Zhaoen, Austin James, Peter Selednik, Stuart Anderson, and Shunsuke Saito. Sapiens: Foundation for human vision mod- els. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12569, 2024. 5

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gala: Generating animatable layered assets from a sin- gle scan, 2024

    Taeksoo Kim, Byungjun Kim, Shunsuke Saito, and Hanbyul Joo. Gala: Generating animatable layered assets from a sin- gle scan, 2024. 2

    2024

  20. [28]

    High-quality animatable dynamic garment re- construction from monocular videos

    Xiongzheng Li, Jinsong Zhang, Yu-Kun Lai, Jingyu Yang, and Kun Li. High-quality animatable dynamic garment re- construction from monocular videos. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cliff: Carrying location information in full frames into human pose and shape estimation

    Zhihao Li, Jianzhuang Liu, Zhensong Zhang, Songcen Xu, and Youliang Yan. Cliff: Carrying location information in full frames into human pose and shape estimation. In ECCV,

  22. [30]

    End-to-end hu- man pose and mesh reconstruction with transformers

    Kevin Lin, Lijuan Wang, and Zicheng Liu. End-to-end hu- man pose and mesh reconstruction with transformers. In CVPR, 2021. 2

    2021

  23. [31]

    Neudf: Leaning neural unsigned distance fields with volume rendering

    Yu-Tao Liu, Li Wang, Jie Yang, Weikai Chen, Xiaoxu Meng, Bo Yang, and Lin Gao. Neudf: Leaning neural unsigned distance fields with volume rendering. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023. 2, 8

    2023

  24. [32]

    Black, and Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf

    Zhen Liu, Yao Feng, Yuliang Xiu, Weiyang Liu, Liam Paull, Michael J. Black, and Bernhard Sch ¨olkopf. Ghost on the shell: An expressive representation of general 3d shapes

  25. [33]

    Neuraludf: Learning unsigned distance fields for multi-view reconstruction of surfaces with arbitrary topolo- gies

    Xiaoxiao Long, Cheng Lin, Lingjie Liu, Yuan Liu, Peng Wang, Christian Theobalt, Taku Komura, and Wenping Wang. Neuraludf: Learning unsigned distance fields for multi-view reconstruction of surfaces with arbitrary topolo- gies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14173, 2022. 2, 7, 8

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Smpl: A skinned multi- person linear model. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 34(6):1–16, 2015. 2, 3, 7

    2015

  27. [35]

    Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm

    William E Lorensen and Harvey E Cline. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3d surface construction algorithm. ACM siggraph computer graphics, 21(4):163–169, 1987. 8

    1987

  28. [36]

    Qianli Ma, Jinlong Yang, Siyu Tang, and Michael J. Black. The power of points for modeling humans in clothing. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021. 2

    2021

  29. [37]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. In ECCV, 2020. 2, 3, 6

    2020

  30. [38]

    Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Light- ing From Images

    Jacob Munkberg, Jon Hasselgren, Tianchang Shen, Jun Gao, Wenzheng Chen, Alex Evans, Thomas M¨uller, and Sanja Fi- dler. Extracting Triangular 3D Models, Materials, and Light- ing From Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2022

  31. [39]

    Npms: Neural parametric models for 3d deformable shapes

    Pablo Palafox, Alja ˇz Boˇziˇc, Justus Thies, Matthias Nießner, and Angela Dai. Npms: Neural parametric models for 3d deformable shapes. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021. 2

    2021

  32. [40]

    Deepsdf: Learning con- tinuous signed distance functions for shape representation

    Jeong Joon Park, Peter Florence, Julian Straub, Richard Newcombe, and Steven Lovegrove. Deepsdf: Learning con- tinuous signed distance functions for shape representation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 165–174, 2019. 2

    2019

  33. [41]

    ihuman: Instant animatable digital humans from monocular videos

    P Paudel, A Khanal, A Chhatkuli, D Paudel, and J Tandukar. ihuman: Instant animatable digital humans from monocular videos. In ECCV, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  34. [42]

    Intrinsicngp: Intrinsic coordinate based hash encod- ing for human nerf

    Bo Peng, Jun Hu, Jingtao Zhou, Xuan Gao, and Juyong Zhang. Intrinsicngp: Intrinsic coordinate based hash encod- ing for human nerf. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2023. 2

    2023

  35. [43]

    Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans

    Sida Peng, Yuanqing Zhang, Yinghao Xu, Qianqian Wang, Qing Shuai, Hujun Bao, and Xiaowei Zhou. Neural body: Implicit neural representations with structured latent codes for novel view synthesis of dynamic humans. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision a...

    2021

  36. [44]

    Clothcap: Seamless 4d clothing capture and retarget- ing

    Gerard Pons-Moll, Sergi Pujades, Sonny Hu, and Michael Black. Clothcap: Seamless 4d clothing capture and retarget- ing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 36(4), 2017. Two first authors contributed equally. 2

    2017

  37. [45]

    Recmv: Reconstructing 3d dynamic cloth from monocular videos

    Lingteng Qiu, Guanying Chen, Jiapeng Zhou, Mutian Xu, Junle Wang, and Xiaoguang Han. Recmv: Reconstructing 3d dynamic cloth from monocular videos. In CVPR, 2023. 2, 3, 6, 7

    2023

  38. [46]

    Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos

    Nikhila Ravi, Valentin Gabeur, Yuan-Ting Hu, Ronghang Hu, Chaitanya Ryali, Tengyu Ma, Haitham Khedr, Roman R¨adle, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Eric Mintun, Junt- ing Pan, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Nicolas Carion, Chao- Yuan Wu, Ross Girshick, Piotr Doll´ar, and Christoph Feic...

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Isp: Multi-layered garment draping with implicit sewing patterns

    Li Ren, Benoit Guillard, and Pascal Fua. Isp: Multi-layered garment draping with implicit sewing patterns. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. 2

    2023

  40. [48]

    Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitiza- tion

    Shunsuke Saito, Zeng Huang, Ryota Natsume, Shigeo Mor- ishima, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Hao Li. Pifu: Pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution clothed human digitiza- tion. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 2304–2314, 2019. 2

    2019

  41. [49]

    Pifuhd: Multi-level pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution 3d human digitization

    Shunsuke Saito, Tomas Simon, Jason Saragih, and Hanbyul Joo. Pifuhd: Multi-level pixel-aligned implicit function for high-resolution 3d human digitization. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020. 2

    2020

  42. [50]

    Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks

    Mark Sandler, Andrew Howard, Menglong Zhu, Andrey Zh- moginov, and Liang-Chieh Chen. Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 4510–4520, 2018. 6

    2018

  43. [51]

    Snug: Self-supervised neural dynamic garments

    Igor Santesteban, Miguel A Otaduy, and Dan Casas. Snug: Self-supervised neural dynamic garments. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8140–8150, 2022. 5, 6

    2022

  44. [52]

    Deep marching tetrahedra: a hybrid represen- tation for high-resolution 3d shape synthesis

    Tianchang Shen, Jun Gao, Kangxue Yin, Ming-Yu Liu, and Sanja Fidler. Deep marching tetrahedra: a hybrid represen- tation for high-resolution 3d shape synthesis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021. 2, 3, 4

    2021

  45. [53]

    Dressrecon: Freeform 4d human recon- struction from monocular video, 2024

    Jeff Tan, Donglai Xiang, Shubham Tulsiani, Deva Ramanan, and Gengshan Yang. Dressrecon: Freeform 4d human recon- struction from monocular video, 2024. 3

    2024

  46. [54]

    GoMAvatar: Efficient Animatable Hu- man Modeling from Monocular Video Using Gaussians-on- Mesh

    Jing Wen, Xiaoming Zhao, Zhongzheng Ren, Alex Schwing, and Shenlong Wang. GoMAvatar: Efficient Animatable Hu- man Modeling from Monocular Video Using Gaussians-on- Mesh. In CVPR, 2024. 2, 3, 6, 7

    2024

  47. [55]

    Multi-view mesh recon- struction with neural deferred shading

    Markus Worchel, Rodrigo Diaz, Weiwen Hu, Oliver Schreer, Ingo Feldmann, and Peter Eisert. Multi-view mesh recon- struction with neural deferred shading. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6187–6197, 2022. 6

    2022

  48. [56]

    Monoperfcap: Human performance capture from monocular video

    Weipeng Xu, Avishek Chatterjee, Michael Zollh ¨ofer, Helge Rhodin, Dushyant Mehta, Hans-Peter Seidel, and Christian Theobalt. Monoperfcap: Human performance capture from monocular video. ACM Trans. Graph. , 37(2):27:1–27:15,

  49. [57]

    Closet: Modeling clothed humans on continuous surface with explicit template decomposition

    Hongwen Zhang, Siyou Lin, Ruizhi Shao, Yuxiang Zhang, Zerong Zheng, Han Huang, Yandong Guo, and Yebin Liu. Closet: Modeling clothed humans on continuous surface with explicit template decomposition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- ...

    2023

  50. [58]

    Registering explicit to implicit: Towards high-fidelity gar- ment mesh reconstruction from single images

    Heming Zhu, Lingteng Qiu, Yuda Qiu, and Xiaoguang Han. Registering explicit to implicit: Towards high-fidelity gar- ment mesh reconstruction from single images. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 3845–3854, 2022. 2

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.