Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 164 references

A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Gamma-ray bursts' central engines can keep firing for seconds to thousands of seconds after the initial flash, with ultra-long prompt phases and afterglow plateaus as the observable evidence.

desk verdict A competent specialist review of ultra-long GRBs and plateaus, honest about open debates, but the steep-decay-based duration estimator is asserted rather than defended. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.01857 v1 pith:TTA6UH37 submitted 2025-01-03 astro-ph.HE

Bruce Gendre (University of the Virgin Islands & University of Western Australia) This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-rayburstsultra-longGRBsX-rayplateauscentralengineafterglowfireballmodelmagnetartransientevents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that gamma-ray bursts are not a single instantaneous explosion: the central engine that powers the burst can keep injecting energy for seconds to thousands of seconds after the initial flash. The two main pieces of evidence are ultra-long gamma-ray bursts, whose prompt phase lasts more than roughly 1,000 seconds, and the X-ray plateau phase, a flat stretch at the start of the afterglow that was discovered with Swift. The paper reviews how these long-lived features are measured, why the standard T90 duration missed them, and which central-engine models (a massive-star collapsar, a newborn magnetar, a tidal disruption event, or sustained energy injection into the fireball) can explain them. The stakes are that GRB duration, classification, and the physics of black-hole formation all change if the engine is genuinely long-lived.

What carries the argument

The central objects are two observed light-curve features and one timing proxy. The plateau phase is a shallow, long-lasting decay between the prompt emission and the normal afterglow, with decay index usually below 0.7 and sometimes negative; the ultra-long prompt phase is defined by durations greater than about $10^3$ seconds. The timing proxy is the steep decay phase, which the paper, following earlier work, identifies with high-latitude emission that appears once the on-axis emission switches off; the start of this phase marks the end of central-engine activity and the end marks when engine-related emission has ceased. These features are interpreted within the canonical fireball model, where the central engine is a black box (collapsar, neutron-star merger, or magnetar) that injects energy into an ultra-relativistic fireball, and long-lived activity is modeled as late energy extraction or injection.

What would settle it

One decisive observation would be an ultra-long burst with continuous high-cadence gamma-ray and X-ray coverage in which the steep decay begins while gamma-ray emission is still clearly detected; that would contradict the claim that the steep decay marks the end of central-engine activity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that long-lasting activity in gamma-ray bursts is real and points to a central engine that stays active far longer than the initial burst. It takes the plateau phase, discovered early in the Swift mission, as the first evidence that the engine continues working, and treats the ultra-long GRB class as defined essentially by its ultra-long prompt duration. The review argues that all proposed explanations for ultra-long events require the central engine to be active for an extended time, and that the plateau is best explained by late energy injection, most prominently a spinning-down magnetar. The paper is careful to separate these claims from the more ambiguous late-time X-ray flares, which may be refreshed shocks rather than engine activity.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the steep decay phase in the X-ray light curve marks the moment the central engine switches off; if that phase is actually just the off-axis tail of the prompt emission or the beginning of the afterglow, the inferred engine-active times and the distinctness of the ultra-long class would weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the steep decay phase marks the end of engine activity, then X-ray light curves provide a way to measure GRB durations even when Earth occultation or detector sensitivity truncates the gamma-ray signal.
  • The Dainotti relation between plateau end time and plateau luminosity gives a potential standard candle that connects the plateau phase to physical properties of the central engine.
  • A magnetar origin for plateaus and at least some ultra-long bursts would unify the two phenomena under one progenitor and predict a spin-down luminosity evolution that can be checked against the observed plateau shapes.
  • Future missions such as SVOM, with long pointing and a 20-minute image trigger, should catch more ultra-long events and monitor plateaus with better sensitivity, testing whether the class is truly distinct or the tail of the long-GRB distribution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the steep-decay timing interpretation holds, the distribution of engine-active times across the GRB population becomes a direct probe of how long accretion lasts onto the newly formed black hole, which could separate collapsar from magnetar engines without needing spectra.
  • Editorial inference: Since ultra-long GRBs are defined only by duration, current catalogs likely miss or misclassify them when the start or end of the prompt phase is occulted by Earth; a systematic re-analysis of BATSE and Swift events with relaxed T90 criteria would test how common they really are.
  • Editorial inference: If plateaus are powered by magnetar spin-down, next-generation gravitational-wave detectors might see a characteristic spin-down signal from the same events, providing a multi-messenger test the paper gestures toward but does not develop.
  • Editorial inference: The paper's caution about X-ray flares implies that flares are a weaker test of engine longevity than plateaus; a clean test would measure whether plateau end times correlate with the start times of steep decays in the same burst.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a short review of two classes of long-lasting activity in gamma-ray bursts: ultra-long GRBs (ulGRBs), defined by an extreme prompt-phase duration, and X-ray afterglow plateaus. The review summarizes their observational properties, the theoretical models proposed to explain them (collapsars, magnetars, tidal disruption, refreshed shocks), and the prospects for future missions (SVOM, THESEUS, next-generation gravitational-wave detectors). It argues that both phenomena point to a central engine that remains active for seconds to thousands of seconds beyond the initial event, and it presents the canonical fireball model as the framework for interpreting these features. The paper is primarily a synthesis of the existing literature, with no new data or quantitative analysis.

Significance. If the conclusions of the review are accepted, it provides a concise and readable entry point to the current understanding of long-lasting central engine activity in GRBs. The review collects a broad set of references, clearly describes the main competing progenitor models, and explicitly notes several open debates, such as whether ulGRBs are a distinct class and whether plateaus are engine-powered. Its main strength is the clear presentation of the canonical fireball model and the discussion of the degeneracies facing plateau interpretations. However, the review does not critically examine one load-bearing assumption—the interpretation of the steep decay phase as a direct marker of central engine turn-off—which is central to the statistical case for a distinct ulGRB class. The paper is therefore useful as a summary, but its central claim is presented with less caution than the evidence warrants.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, paragraph on the X-ray duration estimator] The review states that the start and end of the steep decay phase correspond to the end of central engine activity, citing Refs. [39-42], and this estimator underpins the ulGRB duration measurements and the claimed bimodality in Ref. [48]. This is a load-bearing assumption, but the review does not mention alternative physical origins for the steep decay, such as the onset of the external forward shock or spectral/curvature effects unrelated to engine turn-off. The review itself later acknowledges in Section 5.2 that late flares can be refreshed shocks rather than direct engine activity, but that caveat is not applied to the steep-decay estimator. The authors should either defend this assumption with a short discussion of the evidence for the high-latitude interpretation, or explicitly flag it as an assumption and explain how the ulGRB duration estimates and the bimodality claim would be affected if the steep decay were not a clean engine turn-off marker.
  2. [Section 3.1, final paragraph] The review concludes that 'the only thing defining an ultra-long GRB is its ultra-long duration, as summarized in Table 1.' This is a strong assertion that overstates the current consensus, given that the same section reports that the duration threshold is 'ad hoc' (citing Refs. [47,48]) and that Ref. [50] and Ref. [40] argued that ulGRBs are consistent with the tail of the long GRB distribution. A more balanced phrasing, explicitly noting that the distinctness of the class remains debated, would better reflect the evidence presented in the review itself and would avoid endorsing one side of an ongoing controversy without additional justification.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1 and Figure 2 captions] The captions contain the typo 'arbritary units'; it should be 'arbitrary units.'
  2. [Section 2, opening paragraph] The phrase 'we will first address the difficulty of making accurate measurements of a duration. we will then review...' incorrectly capitalizes 'we' after a period; it should be 'We will then review...'.
  3. [Section 2, second paragraph] The sentence 'This, however, does not carry a physical meaning (the prompt phase is over), but an observational one (the signal is too faint)' is oddly phrased; the parentheticals would be clearer if integrated into the main text, e.g., 'This does not mean the prompt phase is physically over, only that the signal has become too faint to detect.'
  4. [Section 3.1, host galaxy paragraph] The word 'metalicity' should be 'metallicity' (two occurrences).
  5. [Throughout] The phrase 'as it' is used in multiple places (e.g., 'As it, the start of this phase...', 'As it, the plateau has a very vague definition') where 'therefore' or 'consequently' would be more standard English.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review is interpretive, and its load-bearing assumptions are external physical hypotheses rather than fitted inputs or self-imported results.

full rationale

This is a review article, not a derivation paper, so there are no equations or fitted parameters whose outputs are re-imported as predictions. The central claim that GRB central engines can remain active for thousands of seconds rests on two observed phenomena: the ultra-long prompt phase and the afterglow plateau. The load-bearing step is Section 2's identification of the steep-decay phase with the end of central-engine activity; that identification is taken from the external high-latitude-emission papers [41,42] and is stated as a physical hypothesis, not defined into existence by any quantity fitted in this review. The review also cites the author's own earlier statistical work [48,49] to support the distinctness of ultra-long GRBs, but those are public data analyses with stated criteria, and the review explicitly discusses the opposing analyses of [40] and [50]. Section 5.2 further concedes that late X-ray flares and plateaus can be refreshed shocks rather than engine activity, so the review does not suppress alternative interpretations. The only serious weakness, lack of defense against alternative origins of the steep decay, is an astrophysical-assumption risk, not a circular step: nothing here is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new free parameters or entities are introduced. The review's conclusions rest on published observational studies and standard astrophysical assumptions.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The standard fireball model describes GRB prompt and afterglow emission.
    Invoked throughout the review, especially in Section 4, to interpret light curves and central-engine activity.
  • domain assumption The plateau phase is powered by extended energy injection from the central engine (or refreshed shocks).
    Section 5 explores this as one of the leading explanations for plateau phases.
  • domain assumption The start and end of the steep decay phase bracket the end of central engine activity.
    Section 2, following [39-42], is used to measure ultra-long GRB durations.
  • domain assumption Ultra-long GRBs with prompt duration >5000 s constitute a distinct population.
    Section 3.1 presents evidence from [48,49] but also notes the opposing view in [50].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TTA6UH37

@misc{pith2026250101857,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TTA6UH37}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.01857}
}
read the original abstract

Gamma-ray bursts are known to display various features on top of their canonical behavior. In this short review, we will describe and discuss two of them: the ultra-long gamma-ray bursts, which are defined by an extreme duration of their prompt phase, and the plateau phase, which is defined by a steady phase of large duration at the start of the afterglow. We will review the main properties of those two phenomena, and will discuss their possible origin, in light of the standard fireball model of gamma-ray bursts. A final section will discuss the future missions which could bring new evidences to the study of those objects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.01857 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic view of a normal long gamma-ray burst lightcurve. From the left to the right the various phases are the prompt phase, the steep decay phase, the plateau phase, the normal afterglow phase, and the post-jet break phase. Within this review, we will concentrate on the two phases indicated by the solid colored lines. Secondly, there is no clear signal of the end of the prompt phase in the gamma-ray band. The si… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic comparison of the light curves of a normal long GRB (dashed line) with the deviations caused by an ultra-long GRB (solid top line), and a GRB with a plateau phase (solid bottom line). For simplicity, the initial prompt and the late afterglow luminosities have been fixed to a common value. This simplification is not representative of the diversity of the observed fluxes for those events, but enhance the dif… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic description of the canonical model, focusing on the inner components of the model. Represented are the progenitor (as a blue supergiant star), the central engine (as the black dot at the center of the progenitor), and the jets. On the right part of the schema, the jet is a matter dominated jet where the energy extracted from the central engine is stored as kinetic energy into the jet. On the left part of t… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [48]

    Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts Different? Astrophysical Journal 2015, 800, 16, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1310.4944]

    Boër, M.; Gendre, B.; Stratta, G. Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts Different? Astrophysical Journal 2015, 800, 16, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1310.4944]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/16

    arXiv 2015

  2. [50]

    GRB 091024A and the Nature of Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Virgili, F.J.; Mundell, C.G.; Pal’shin, V .; Guidorzi, C.; Margutti, R.; Melandri, A.; Harrison, R.; Kobayashi, S.; Chornock, R.; Henden, A.; et al. GRB 091024A and the Nature of Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2013, 778, 54, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1310.0313]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/54

    arXiv 2013

  3. [1]

    Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin

    Klebesadel, R.W.; Strong, I.B.; Olson, R.A. Observations of Gamma-Ray Bursts of Cosmic Origin. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1973, 182, L85. https://doi.org/10.1086/181225

    doi:10.1086/181225 1973

  4. [2]

    Catalog of cosmic gamma-ray bursts from the KONUS experiment data.Astrophysics and Space Sciences 1981, 80, 3–83

    Mazets, E.P .; Golenetskii, S.V .; Ilinskii, V .N.; Panov, V .N.; Aptekar, R.L.; Gurian, I.A.; Proskura, M.P .; Sokolov, I.A.; Sokolova, Z.I.; Kharitonova, T.V . Catalog of cosmic gamma-ray bursts from the KONUS experiment data.Astrophysics and Space Sciences 1981, 80, 3–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00649140

    doi:10.1007/bf00649140 1981

  5. [3]

    Observation of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra at High Energy by the Phebus Experiment

    Barat, C.; Dezalay, J.P .; Talon, R.; Syunyaev, R.; Kuznetsov, A.; Terekhov, O. Observation of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra at High Energy by the Phebus Experiment. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference Series; Paciesas, W.S.; Fishman, G.J., Eds. AIP , jan 1992, Vol. 265,American Institute of Physics Conference Series, p. 43

    1992

  6. [4]

    The First BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog

    Fishman, G.J.; Meegan, C.A.; Wilson, R.B.; Brock, M.N.; Horack, J.M.; Kouveliotou, C.; Howard, S.; Paciesas, W.S.; Briggs, M.S.; Pendleton, G.N.; et al. The First BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 1994, 92, 229. https://doi.org/10.1086/191968

    doi:10.1086/191968 1994

  7. [5]

    The first X-ray localization of a gamma-ray burst by BeppoSAX and its fast spectral evolution

    Piro, L.; Heise, J.; Jager, R.; Costa, E.; Frontera, F.; Feroci, M.; Muller, J.M.; Amati, L.; Cinti, M.N.; dal Fiume, D.; et al. The first X-ray localization of a gamma -ray burst by BeppoSAX and its fast spectral evolution.Astronomy & Astrophysics 1998, 329, 906–910, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9707215]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9707215

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9707215 1998

  8. [6]

    The High Energy Transient Explorer (HETE): Mission and Science Overview

    Ricker, G.R.; Atteia, J.L.; Crew, G.B.; Doty, J.P .; Fenimore, E.E.; Galassi, M.; Graziani, C.; Hurley, K.; Jernigan, J.G.; Kawai, N.; et al. The High Energy Transient Explorer (HETE): Mission and Science Overview. In Proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Burst and Afterglow Astronomy 2001: A Workshop Celebrating the First Year of the HETE Mission; Ricker, G.R.; V...

    doi:10.1063/1.1579291 2001

Show all 164 references
  1. [7]

    The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission

    Gehrels, N.; Chincarini, G.; Giommi, P .; Mason, K.O.; Nousek, J.A.; Wells, A.A.; White, N.E.; Barthelmy, S.D.; Burrows, D.N.; Cominsky, L.R.; et al. The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. Astrophysical Journal 2004, 611, 1005–1020, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro- ph/0405233]. https://doi....

    2004

  2. [8]

    The physics of gamma-ray bursts; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2019

    Zhang, B. The physics of gamma-ray bursts; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2019

    2019

  3. [9]

    Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars

    Eichler, D.; Livio, M.; Piran, T.; Schramm, D.N. Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars. Nature 1989, 340, 126–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/340126a0

    1989 doi

  4. [10]

    Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes

    Woosley, S.E. Gamma-Ray Bursts from Stellar Mass Accretion Disks around Black Holes. Astrophysical Journal 1993, 405, 273. https://doi.org/10.1086/172359

    1993 doi

  5. [11]

    The 5 March 1979 event and the distinct class of short gamma bursts: are they of the same origin? Astrophysics and Space Sciences 1982, 84, 173–189

    Mazets, E.P .; Golenetskii, S.V .; Gurian, I.A.; Ilinskii, V .N. The 5 March 1979 event and the distinct class of short gamma bursts: are they of the same origin? Astrophysics and Space Sciences 1982, 84, 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713635

    1979 doi

  6. [12]

    Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole

    Burrows, D.N.; Kennea, J.A.; Ghisellini, G.; Mangano, V .; Zhang, B.; Page, K.L.; Eracleous, M.; Romano, P .; Sakamoto, T.; Falcone, A.D.; et al. Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole. Nature 2011, 476, 421–424, [arXiv:astro-ph.H...

    2011 arXiv

  7. [13]

    The 80 Ms follow-up of the X-ray afterglow of GRB 130427A challenges the standard forward shock model

    De Pasquale, M.; Page, M.J.; Kann, D.A.; Oates, S.R.; Schulze, S.; Zhang, B.; Cano, Z.; Gendre, B.; Malesani, D.; Rossi, A.; et al. The 80 Ms follow-up of the X-ray afterglow of GRB 130427A challenges the standard forward shock model. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical ...

    2016 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model

    Piran, T. Gamma-ray bursts and the fireball model. Physics Reports 1999, 314, 575–667, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9810256]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00127-6

    1999 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Gamma-ray bursts.Reports on Progress in Physics 2006, 69, 2259–2321, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0605208]

    Mészáros, P . Gamma-ray bursts.Reports on Progress in Physics 2006, 69, 2259–2321, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0605208]. https: //doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/8/R01

    2006 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Evidence for a Canonical Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data

    Nousek, J.A.; Kouveliotou, C.; Grupe, D.; Page, K.L.; Granot, J.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Patel, S.K.; Burrows, D.N.; Mangano, V .; Barthelmy, S.; et al. Evidence for a Canonical Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data. Astrophysical Journal 2006, 642, 389–400, [...

    2006 arXiv

  11. [17]

    The Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Burst 111209A: The Collapse of a Blue Supergiant? Astrophysical Journal 2013, 766, 30, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1212.2392]

    Gendre, B.; Stratta, G.; Atteia, J.L.; Basa, S.; Boër, M.; Coward, D.M.; Cutini, S.; D’Elia, V .; Howell, E.J.; Klotz, A.; et al. The Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Burst 111209A: The Collapse of a Blue Supergiant? Astrophysical Journal 2013, 766, 30, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1212.2392]. htt...

    2013 arXiv

  12. [18]

    A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Levan, A.J.; Tanvir, N.R.; Starling, R.L.C.; Wiersema, K.; Page, K.L.; Perley, D.A.; Schulze, S.; Wynn, G.A.; Chornock, R.; Hjorth, J.; et al. A New Population of Ultra-long Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2014, 781, 13, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1302.2352]. https:/...

    2014 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Happy Birthday Swift: Ultra-long GRB 141121A and Its Broadband Afterglow

    Cucchiara, A.; Veres, P .; Corsi, A.; Cenko, S.B.; Perley, D.A.; Lien, A.; Marshall, F.E.; Pagani, C.; Toy, V .L.; Capone, J.I.; et al. Happy Birthday Swift: Ultra-long GRB 141121A and Its Broadband Afterglow. Astrophysical Journal 2015, 812, 122, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1510.0099...

    2015 arXiv

  14. [20]

    The Third Swift Burst Alert Telescope Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog

    Lien, A.; Sakamoto, T.; Barthelmy, S.D.; Baumgartner, W.H.; Cannizzo, J.K.; Chen, K.; Collins, N.R.; Cummings, J.R.; Gehrels, N.; Krimm, H.A.; et al. The Third Swift Burst Alert Telescope Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog. Astrophysical Journal 2016, 829, 7, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1606.0195...

    2016 arXiv

  15. [21]

    The ultra-long GRB 220627A at z = 3.08

    de Wet, S.; Izzo, L.; Groot, P .J.; Bisero, S.; D’Elia, V .; De Pasquale, M.; Hartmann, D.H.; Heintz, K.E.; Jakobsson, P .; Laskar, T.; et al. The ultra-long GRB 220627A at z = 3.08. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2023, 677, A32, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2307.10339]. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2023 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Short Cosmic Events: A Subset of Classical GRBs? In Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference Series; Paciesas, W.S.; Fishman, G.J., Eds

    Dezalay, J.P .; Barat, C.; Talon, R.; Syunyaev, R.; Terekhov, O.; Kuznetsov, A. Short Cosmic Events: A Subset of Classical GRBs? In Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference Series; Paciesas, W.S.; Fishman, G.J., Eds. AIP , jan 1992, Vol. 265, American Instit...

    1992

  17. [23]

    Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Kouveliotou, C.; Meegan, C.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Bhat, N.P .; Briggs, M.S.; Koshut, T.M.; Paciesas, W.S.; Pendleton, G.N. Identification of Two Classes of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1993, 413, L101. https://doi.org/10.1086/186969

    1993 doi

  18. [24]

    Three Types of Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Mukherjee, S.; Feigelson, E.D.; Jogesh Babu, G.; Murtagh, F.; Fraley, C.; Raftery, A. Three Types of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 1998, 508, 314–327, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9802085]. https://doi.org/10.1086/306386

    1998 arXiv

  19. [25]

    An apparently normal γ-ray burst with an unusually low luminosity

    Sazonov, S.Y.; Lutovinov, A.A.; Sunyaev, R.A. An apparently normal γ-ray burst with an unusually low luminosity. Nature 2004, 430, 646–648, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0408095]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02748

    2004 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Unique Population: Luminosity Function, Local Rate, and Beaming Factor

    Liang, E.; Zhang, B.; Virgili, F.; Dai, Z.G. Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts as a Unique Population: Luminosity Function, Local Rate, and Beaming Factor. Astrophysical Journal 2007, 662, 1111–1118, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0605200]. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/517959

    2007 arXiv

  21. [27]

    T90 as a Measurment of the Duration of GRBs

    Koshut, T.M.; Paciesas, W.S.; Kouveliotou, C.; van Paradijs, J.; Pendleton, G.N.; Fishman, G.J.; Meegan, C.A. T90 as a Measurment of the Duration of GRBs. In Proceedings of the American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #186, may 1995, Vol. 186, American Astronomical Soci...

    1995

  22. [28]

    Gamma- Ray Burst Precursor Activity as Observed with BATSE

    Koshut, T.M.; Kouveliotou, C.; Paciesas, W.S.; van Paradijs, J.; Pendleton, G.N.; Briggs, M.S.; Fishman, G.J.; Meegan, C.A. Gamma- Ray Burst Precursor Activity as Observed with BATSE. Astrophysical Journal 1995, 452, 145. https://doi.org/10.1086/176286

    1995 doi

  23. [29]

    Precursors in Swift Gamma Ray Bursts with Redshift

    Burlon, D.; Ghirlanda, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Lazzati, D.; Nava, L.; Nardini, M.; Celotti, A. Precursors in Swift Gamma Ray Bursts with Redshift. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2008, 685, L19, [arXiv:astro-ph/0806.3076]. https://doi.org/10.1086/592350

    2008 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Temporal Analysis of GRB Precursors in the Third Swift-BAT Catalog

    Li, L.; Mao, J. Temporal Analysis of GRB Precursors in the Third Swift-BAT Catalog. Astrophysical Journal 2022, 928, 152, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2201.12485]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac4af2

    2022 arXiv

  25. [31]

    The Fourth BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog (Revised)

    Paciesas, W.S.; Meegan, C.A.; Pendleton, G.N.; Briggs, M.S.; Kouveliotou, C.; Koshut, T.M.; Lestrade, J.P .; McCollough, M.L.; Brainerd, J.J.; Hakkila, J.; et al. The Fourth BATSE Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog (Revised). Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 1999, 122, 465–495, [a...

    1999 arXiv

  26. [32]

    BATSE’s Sky Sensitivity Map

    Brock, M.N.; Meegan, C.A.; Fishman, G.J.; Wilson, R.B.; Paciesas, W.S.; Pendleton, G.N. BATSE’s Sky Sensitivity Map. In Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics Conference Series; Paciesas, W.S.; Fishman, G.J., Eds. AIP , jan 1992, Vol. 265, American Institute of Physi...

    1992

  27. [33]

    BATSE sky exposure

    Hakkila, J.; Meegan, C.A.; Pendleton, G.N.; Henze, W.; McCollough, M.; Kommers, J.M.; Briggs, M.S. BATSE sky exposure. In Proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Bursts, 4th Hunstville Symposium; Meegan, C.A.; Preece, R.D.; Koshut, T.M., Eds. AIP , may 1998, Vol. 428, American Institute ...

    1998 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Repeating Sources of Classical Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Wang, V .C.; Lingenfelter, R.E. Repeating Sources of Classical Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 1995, 441, 747. https: //doi.org/10.1086/175396

    1995 doi

  29. [35]

    Characteristics of Two- episode Emission Patterns in Fermi Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Lan, L.; Lü, H.J.; Zhong, S.Q.; Zhang, H.M.; Rice, J.; Cheng, J.G.; Du, S.S.; Li, L.; Lin, J.; Lu, R.J.; et al. Characteristics of Two- episode Emission Patterns in Fermi Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2018, 862, 155, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1806.06690]. https://doi.o...

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    A Temporal Correlation in Quiescent Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Emission: Evidence for Prognitor Memory

    Patton, T.L.; Giblin, T.; Hakkila, J.E. A Temporal Correlation in Quiescent Gamma-Ray Burst Prompt Emission: Evidence for Prognitor Memory. In Proceedings of the American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #232, jun 2018, Vol. 232, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abs...

    2018

  31. [37]

    The possible impact of gamma-ray burst detector thresholds on cosmological standard candles

    Shahmoradi, A.; Nemiroff, R.J. The possible impact of gamma-ray burst detector thresholds on cosmological standard candles. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2011, 411, 1843–1856, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/0904.1464]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2010.17805.x

    2011 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Zhang, B.; Zhang, B.B.; Virgili, F.J.; Liang, E.W.; Kann, D.A.; Wu, X.F.; Proga, D.; Lv, H.J.; Toma, K.; Mészáros, P .; et al. Discerning the Physical Origins of Cosmological Gamma-ray Bursts Based on Multiple Observational Criteria: The Cases of z = 6.7 GRB 080913, z = 8.2 GR...

    2009 arXiv

  33. [39]

    The Ultra-long GRB 111209A

    Stratta, G.; Gendre, B.; Atteia, J.L.; Boër, M.; Coward, D.M.; De Pasquale, M.; Howell, E.; Klotz, A.; Oates, S.; Piro, L. The Ultra-long GRB 111209A. II. Prompt to Afterglow and Afterglow Properties. Astrophysical Journal 2013, 779, 66, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1306.1699]. https:/...

    2013 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Afterglow Emission from Naked Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal Letters 2000, 541, L51–L54, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0006317]

    Kumar, P .; Panaitescu, A. Afterglow Emission from Naked Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal Letters 2000, 541, L51–L54, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0006317]. https://doi.org/10.1086/312905

    2000 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Testing the Standard Fireball Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts Using Late X-Ray Afterglows Measured by Swift

    Willingale, R.; O’Brien, P .T.; Osborne, J.P .; Godet, O.; Page, K.L.; Goad, M.R.; Burrows, D.N.; Zhang, B.; Rol, E.; Gehrels, N.; et al. Testing the Standard Fireball Model of Gamma-Ray Bursts Using Late X-Ray Afterglows Measured by Swift. Astrophysical Journal 2007, 662, 109...

    2007 arXiv

  36. [43]

    BeppoSAX, the wide band mission for X-ray astronomy

    Boella, G.; Butler, R.C.; Perola, G.C.; Piro, L.; Scarsi, L.; Bleeker, J.A.M. BeppoSAX, the wide band mission for X-ray astronomy. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series 1997, 122, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1051/aas:1997136. Version January 6, 2025 submitted to Galaxies 12 of 17

    1997 doi

  37. [44]

    Discovery of an X-ray afterglow associated with the γ-ray burst of 28 February 1997

    Costa, E.; Frontera, F.; Heise, J.; Feroci, M.; in’t Zand, J.; Fiore, F.; Cinti, M.N.; Dal Fiume, D.; Nicastro, L.; Orlandini, M.; et al. Discovery of an X-ray afterglow associated with the γ-ray burst of 28 February 1997. Nature 1997, 387, 783–785, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/97...

    1997 arXiv

  38. [45]

    The BeppoSAX catalog of GRB X-ray afterglow observations

    de Pasquale, M.; Piro, L.; Gendre, B.; Amati, L.; Antonelli, L.A.; Costa, E.; Feroci, M.; Frontera, F.; Nicastro, L.; Soffitta, P .; et al. The BeppoSAX catalog of GRB X-ray afterglow observations. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2006, 455, 813–824, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro- ph/0507708]...

    2006

  39. [46]

    The transition between the main event and the afterglow: BeppoSAX

    Soffitta, P .; de Pasquale, M.; Piro, L.; Costa, E. The transition between the main event and the afterglow: BeppoSAX. In Proceedings of the Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Afterglow Era; Feroci, M.; Frontera, F.; Masetti, N.; Piro, L., Eds., jun 2004, Vol. 312,Astronomical Society of...

    2004

  40. [47]

    How Long does a Burst Burst? Astrophysical Journal 2014, 787, 66, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1310.2540]

    Zhang, B.B.; Zhang, B.; Murase, K.; Connaughton, V .; Briggs, M.S. How Long does a Burst Burst? Astrophysical Journal 2014, 787, 66, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1310.2540]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/66

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Can we quickly flag ultra-long gamma-ray bursts? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2019, 486, 2471–2476, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1904.04550]

    Gendre, B.; Joyce, Q.T.; Orange, N.B.; Stratta, G.; Atteia, J.L.; Boër, M. Can we quickly flag ultra-long gamma-ray bursts? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2019, 486, 2471–2476, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1904.04550]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stz1036

    2019 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Fires in the deep: The luminosity distribution of early-time gamma-ray-burst afterglows in light of the Gamow Explorer sensitivity requirements

    Kann, D.A.; White, N.E.; Ghirlanda, G.; Oates, S.R.; Melandri, A.; Jelínek, M.; de Ugarte Postigo, A.; Levan, A.J.; Martin-Carrillo, A.; Paek, G.S.H.; et al. Fires in the deep: The luminosity distribution of early-time gamma-ray-burst afterglows in light of the Gamow Explorer ...

    2024 arXiv

  43. [52]

    A Hot Cocoon in the Ultralong GRB 130925A: Hints of a POPIII-like Progenitor in a Low-Density Wind Environment

    Piro, L.; Troja, E.; Gendre, B.; Ghisellini, G.; Ricci, R.; Bannister, K.; Fiore, F.; Kidd, L.A.; Piranomonte, S.; Wieringa, M.H. A Hot Cocoon in the Ultralong GRB 130925A: Hints of a POPIII-like Progenitor in a Low-Density Wind Environment. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2014,...

    2014 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Quasi-blackbody Component and Radiative Efficiency of the Prompt Emission of Gamma-ray Bursts

    Ryde, F.; Pe’er, A. Quasi-blackbody Component and Radiative Efficiency of the Prompt Emission of Gamma-ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2009, 702, 1211–1229, [arXiv:astro-ph/0811.4135]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1211

    2009 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Identification and Properties of the Photospheric Emission in GRB090902B

    Ryde, F.; Axelsson, M.; Zhang, B.B.; McGlynn, S.; Pe’er, A.; Lundman, C.; Larsson, S.; Battelino, M.; Zhang, B.; Bissaldi, E.; et al. Identification and Properties of the Photospheric Emission in GRB090902B. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2010, 709, L172–L177, [arXiv:astro-ph.H...

    2010 arXiv

  46. [55]

    The connection between thermal and non-thermal emission in gamma-ray bursts: general considerations and GRB 090902B as a case study

    Pe’Er, A.; Zhang, B.B.; Ryde, F.; McGlynn, S.; Zhang, B.; Preece, R.D.; Kouveliotou, C. The connection between thermal and non-thermal emission in gamma-ray bursts: general considerations and GRB 090902B as a case study. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2012, ...

    2012 arXiv

  47. [56]

    A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003

    Hjorth, J.; Sollerman, J.; Møller, P .; Fynbo, J.P .U.; Woosley, S.E.; Kouveliotou, C.; Tanvir, N.R.; Greiner, J.; Andersen, M.I.; Castro-Tirado, A.J.; et al. A very energetic supernova associated with the γ-ray burst of 29 March 2003. Nature 2003, 423, 847–850, [arXiv:astro-p...

    2003 arXiv

  48. [57]

    A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst

    Greiner, J.; Mazzali, P .A.; Kann, D.A.; Krühler, T.; Pian, E.; Prentice, S.; Olivares E., F.; Rossi, A.; Klose, S.; Taubenberger, S.; et al. A very luminous magnetar-powered supernova associated with an ultra-long γ-ray burst. Nature 2015, 523, 189–192, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/150...

    2015 arXiv

  49. [58]

    The Locations of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts as Evidence for Compact Object Binary Progenitors

    Fong, W.; Berger, E. The Locations of Short Gamma-Ray Bursts as Evidence for Compact Object Binary Progenitors. Astrophysical Journal 2013, 776, 18, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1307.0819]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/776/1/18

    2013 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Super-solar metallicity at the position of the ultra-long GRB 130925A

    Schady, P .; Krühler, T.; Greiner, J.; Graham, J.F.; Kann, D.A.; Bolmer, J.; Delvaux, C.; Elliott, J.; Klose, S.; Knust, F.; et al. Super-solar metallicity at the position of the ultra-long GRB 130925A. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2015, 579, A126, [arXiv:astro- ph.GA/1505.04415]....

    2015 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Dust in the Wind: the Role of Recent Mass Loss in Long Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Margutti, R.; Guidorzi, C.; Lazzati, D.; Milisavljevic, D.; Kamble, A.; Laskar, T.; Parrent, J.; Gehrels, N.C.; Soderberg, A.M. Dust in the Wind: the Role of Recent Mass Loss in Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2015, 805, 159, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1410.7387]. https:...

    2015 arXiv

  52. [61]

    A mean redshift of 2.8 for Swift gamma-ray bursts

    Jakobsson, P .; Levan, A.; Fynbo, J.P .U.; Priddey, R.; Hjorth, J.; Tanvir, N.; Watson, D.; Jensen, B.L.; Sollerman, J.; Natarajan, P .; et al. A mean redshift of 2.8 for Swift gamma-ray bursts. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2006, 447, 897–903, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro- ph/0509888]. h...

    2006

  53. [62]

    Gamma-ray burst optical light-curve zoo: comparison with X-ray observations

    Zaninoni, E.; Bernardini, M.G.; Margutti, R.; Oates, S.; Chincarini, G. Gamma-ray burst optical light-curve zoo: comparison with X-ray observations. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2013, 557, A12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1303.6924]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-636 1/201321221

    2013 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Optical afterglows of gamma-ray bursts: peaks, plateaus and possibilities

    Panaitescu, A.; Vestrand, W.T. Optical afterglows of gamma-ray bursts: peaks, plateaus and possibilities. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2011, 414, 3537–3546, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1009.3947]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18653.x

    2011 arXiv

  55. [64]

    GRB 110205A: Anatomy of a Long Gamma-Ray Burst

    Gendre, B.; Atteia, J.L.; Boër, M.; Colas, F.; Klotz, A.; Kugel, F.; Laas-Bourez, M.; Rinner, C.; Strajnic, J.; Stratta, G.; et al. GRB 110205A: Anatomy of a Long Gamma-Ray Burst. Astrophysical Journal 2012, 748, 59, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1110.0734]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-...

    2012 arXiv

  56. [65]

    The Optical Luminosity-Time Correlation for More than 100 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    Dainotti, M.G.; Livermore, S.; Kann, D.A.; Li, L.; Oates, S.; Yi, S.; Zhang, B.; Gendre, B.; Cenko, B.; Fraija, N. The Optical Luminosity-Time Correlation for More than 100 Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2020, 905, L26, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2011.14493]...

    2020 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315

    Vaughan, S.; Goad, M.R.; Beardmore, A.P .; O’Brien, P .T.; Osborne, J.P .; Page, K.L.; Barthelmy, S.D.; Burrows, D.N.; Campana, S.; Cannizzo, J.K.; et al. Swift Observations of the X-Ray-Bright GRB 050315. Astrophysical Journal 2006, 638, 920–929, [arXiv:astro- ph/astro-ph/051...

    2006 arXiv

  58. [67]

    A Comprehensive Analysis of Swift XRT Data

    Liang, E.W.; Zhang, B.B.; Zhang, B. A Comprehensive Analysis of Swift XRT Data. II. Diverse Physical Origins of the Shallow Decay Segment. Astrophysical Journal 2007, 670, 565–583, [arXiv:astro-ph/0705.1373]. https://doi.org/10.1086/521870

    2007 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Evidences for two Gamma-Ray Burst afterglow emission regimes

    Boër, M.; Gendre, B. Evidences for two Gamma-Ray Burst afterglow emission regimes. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2000, 361, L21–L24, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0008385]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008385

    2000 doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts

    Amati, L.; Frontera, F.; Tavani, M.; in’t Zand, J.J.M.; Antonelli, A.; Costa, E.; Feroci, M.; Guidorzi, C.; Heise, J.; Masetti, N.; et al. Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2002, 390, 81–89, [arXiv:astr...

    2002 arXiv

  61. [70]

    The Collimation-corrected Gamma-Ray Burst Energies Correlate with the Peak Energy of Their νFν Spectrum

    Ghirlanda, G.; Ghisellini, G.; Lazzati, D. The Collimation-corrected Gamma-Ray Burst Energies Correlate with the Peak Energy of Their νFν Spectrum. Astrophysical Journal 2004, 616, 331–338, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0405602]. https://doi.org/10.1086/424913

    2004 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for a Standard Energy Reservoir

    Frail, D.A.; Kulkarni, S.R.; Sari, R.; Djorgovski, S.G.; Bloom, J.S.; Galama, T.J.; Reichart, D.E.; Berger, E.; Harrison, F.A.; Price, P .A.; et al. Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for a Standard Energy Reservoir. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2001, 562, L55–L58, [arXiv:...

    2001 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Determination of the Intrinsic Luminosity Time Correlation in the X-Ray Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Dainotti, M.G.; Petrosian, V .; Singal, J.; Ostrowski, M. Determination of the Intrinsic Luminosity Time Correlation in the X-Ray Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2013, 774, 157, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1307.7297]. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/774/2/157

    2013 arXiv

  64. [73]

    A Fundamental Plane for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts with X-Ray Plateaus

    Dainotti, M.G.; Postnikov, S.; Hernandez, X.; Ostrowski, M. A Fundamental Plane for Long Gamma-Ray Bursts with X-Ray Plateaus. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2016, 825, L20, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1604.06840]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/825/ 2/L20

    2016 arXiv

  65. [74]

    The Three-parameter Correlations About the Optical Plateaus of Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Si, S.K.; Qi, Y.Q.; Xue, F.X.; Liu, Y.J.; Wu, X.; Yi, S.X.; Tang, Q.W.; Zou, Y.C.; Wang, F.F.; Wang, X.G. The Three-parameter Correlations About the Optical Plateaus of Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2018, 863, 50, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1807.00241]. https://doi.org/10.38...

    2018 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Relativistic fireballs - Energy conversion and time-scales

    Rees, M.J.; Meszaros, P . Relativistic fireballs - Energy conversion and time-scales. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1992, 258, 41. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P

    1992 doi

  67. [76]

    Optical and Long-Wavelength Afterglow from Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal 1997, 476, 232–237, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9606043]

    Mészáros, P .; Rees, M.J. Optical and Long-Wavelength Afterglow from Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal 1997, 476, 232–237, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9606043]. https://doi.org/10.1086/303625

    1997 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Multiwavelength Afterglows in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Refreshed Shock and Jet Effects

    Panaitescu, A.; Mészáros, P .; Rees, M.J. Multiwavelength Afterglows in Gamma-Ray Bursts: Refreshed Shock and Jet Effects. Astrophysical Journal 1998, 503, 314–324, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9801258]. https://doi.org/10.1086/305995

    1998 arXiv

  69. [78]

    The Maximum Isotropic Energy of Gamma-ray Bursts

    Atteia, J.L.; Heussaff, V .; Dezalay, J.P .; Klotz, A.; Turpin, D.; Tsvetkova, A.E.; Frederiks, D.D.; Zolnierowski, Y.; Daigne, F.; Mochkovitch, R. The Maximum Isotropic Energy of Gamma-ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2017, 837, 119, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1702.02961]. https://...

    2017 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Gamma-ray bursters at cosmological distances

    Paczynski, B. Gamma-ray bursters at cosmological distances. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1986, 308, L43–L46. https://doi.org/10 .1086/184740

    1986

  71. [80]

    Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; et al. Gravitational Waves and Gamma-Rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2017, 848, L...

    2017 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Millisecond pulsars with extremely strong magnetic fields as a cosmological source ofγ-ray bursts

    Usov, V .V . Millisecond pulsars with extremely strong magnetic fields as a cosmological source ofγ-ray bursts. Nature 1992, 357, 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/357472a0

    1992 doi

  73. [82]

    Swift Observations of GRB 070110: An Extraordinary X-Ray Afterglow Powered by the Central Engine

    Troja, E.; Cusumano, G.; O’Brien, P .T.; Zhang, B.; Sbarufatti, B.; Mangano, V .; Willingale, R.; Chincarini, G.; Osborne, J.P .; Marshall, F.E.; et al. Swift Observations of GRB 070110: An Extraordinary X-Ray Afterglow Powered by the Central Engine. Astrophysical Journal 2007...

    2007 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Gamma-Ray Bursts: Restarting the Engine

    King, A.; O’Brien, P .T.; Goad, M.R.; Osborne, J.; Olsson, E.; Page, K. Gamma-Ray Bursts: Restarting the Engine. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2005, 630, L113–L115, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0508126]. https://doi.org/10.1086/496881

    2005 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Central Engine of Late-time X-Ray Flares with Internal Origin

    Mu, H.J.; Gu, W.M.; Hou, S.J.; Liu, T.; Lin, D.B.; Yi, T.; Liang, E.W.; Lu, J.F. Central Engine of Late-time X-Ray Flares with Internal Origin. Astrophysical Journal 2016, 832, 161, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1609.08290]. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/161

    2016 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Flares in gamma-ray bursts: disc fragmentation and evolution

    Dall’Osso, S.; Perna, R.; Tanaka, T.L.; Margutti, R. Flares in gamma-ray bursts: disc fragmentation and evolution. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2017, 464, 4399–4407, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1610.05302]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2695

    2017 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Flares in gamma-ray burst X-ray afterglows as prompt emission from slightly misaligned structured jets

    Duque, R.; Beniamini, P .; Daigne, F.; Mochkovitch, R. Flares in gamma-ray burst X-ray afterglows as prompt emission from slightly misaligned structured jets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2022, 513, 951–963, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2112.02917]. https://doi.org/...

    2022 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Gamma-ray burst afterglows: effects of radiative corrections and non-uniformity of the surrounding medium

    Dai, Z.G.; Lu, T. Gamma-ray burst afterglows: effects of radiative corrections and non-uniformity of the surrounding medium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1998, 298, 87–92, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9806305]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j. 1365-8711.1998.01681.x...

    1998 arXiv

  79. [88]

    Gamma Ray Bursts as Electromagnetic Outflows

    Lyutikov, M.; Blandford, R. Gamma Ray Bursts as Electromagnetic Outflows. arXiv e-prints 2003, pp. astro–ph/0312347, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0312347]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0312347

    2003 doi

  80. [89]

    Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? Astrophysical Journal Letters 1986, 308, L47

    Goodman, J. Are gamma-ray bursts optically thick? Astrophysical Journal Letters 1986, 308, L47. https://doi.org/10.1086/184741

    1986 doi

  81. [90]

    The Appearance of Cosmic Fireballs

    Shemi, A.; Piran, T. The Appearance of Cosmic Fireballs. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1990, 365, L55. https://doi.org/10.1086/18 5887

    1990 doi

  82. [91]

    Super-Eddington Winds from Neutron Stars

    Paczynski, B. Super-Eddington Winds from Neutron Stars. Astrophysical Journal 1990, 363, 218. https://doi.org/10.1086/169332

    1990 doi

  83. [92]

    Poynting Jets from Black Holes and Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts.The Astrophysical Journal 1997, 482, L29

    Mészáros, P .; Rees, M.J. Poynting Jets from Black Holes and Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts.The Astrophysical Journal 1997, 482, L29. https://doi.org/10.1086/310692

    1997 doi

  84. [93]

    The role of kink instability in Poynting-flux dominated jets.Astronomy & Astrophysics 2006, 450, 887–898, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0601172]

    Giannios, D.; Spruit, H.C. The role of kink instability in Poynting-flux dominated jets.Astronomy & Astrophysics 2006, 450, 887–898, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0601172]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054107

    2006 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Photosphere Emission from a Hybrid Relativistic Outflow with Arbitrary Dimensionless Entropy and Magnetization in GRBs

    Gao, H.; Zhang, B. Photosphere Emission from a Hybrid Relativistic Outflow with Arbitrary Dimensionless Entropy and Magnetization in GRBs. Astrophysical Journal 2015, 801, 103, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1409.3584]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 801/2/103

    2015 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves

    Blandford, R.D.; McKee, C.F. Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves. Physics of Fluids 1976, 19, 1130–1138. https://doi.org/10 .1063/1.861619

    1976

  87. [96]

    Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    Sari, R.; Piran, T.; Narayan, R. Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1998, 497, L17–L20, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9712005]. https://doi.org/10.1086/311269

    1998 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Jets in Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal Letters 1999, 519, L17–L20, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro- ph/9903339]

    Sari, R.; Piran, T.; Halpern, J.P . Jets in Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophysical Journal Letters 1999, 519, L17–L20, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro- ph/9903339]. https://doi.org/10.1086/312109

    1999

  89. [98]

    Analytic Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media

    Panaitescu, A.; Kumar, P . Analytic Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. Astrophysical Journal 2000, 543, 66–76, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0003246]. https://doi.org/10.1086/317090

    arXiv

  90. [99]

    Fundamental Physical Parameters of Collimated Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    Panaitescu, A.; Kumar, P . Fundamental Physical Parameters of Collimated Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2001, 560, L49–L53, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0108045]. https://doi.org/10.1086/324061

    2001 arXiv

  91. [100]

    How to Tell a Jet from a Balloon: A Proposed Test for Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Rhoads, J.E. How to Tell a Jet from a Balloon: A Proposed Test for Beaming in Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal Letters 1997, 487, L1–L4, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9705163]. https://doi.org/10.1086/310876

    1997 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Failed gamma-ray bursts and orphan afterglows

    Huang, Y.F.; Dai, Z.G.; Lu, T. Failed gamma-ray bursts and orphan afterglows. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2002, 332, 735–740, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0112469]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05334.x

    2002 arXiv

  93. [102]

    The Detectability of Orphan Afterglows

    Nakar, E.; Piran, T.; Granot, J. The Detectability of Orphan Afterglows. Astrophysical Journal 2002, 579, 699–705, [arXiv:astro- ph/astro-ph/0204203]. https://doi.org/10.1086/342791

    2002 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    Abbott, B.P .; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adams, T.; Addesso, P .; Adhikari, R.X.; Adya, V .B.; et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2017, 848, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1710.05833]...

    2017 arXiv

  95. [104]

    An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A

    Goldstein, A.; Veres, P .; Burns, E.; Briggs, M.S.; Hamburg, R.; Kocevski, D.; Wilson-Hodge, C.A.; Preece, R.D.; Poolakkil, S.; Roberts, O.J.; et al. An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A. Astrophysical Journal Le...

    2017 arXiv

  96. [105]

    Off-axis emission of short GRB jets from double neutron star mergers and GRB 170817A

    Granot, J.; Gill, R.; Guetta, D.; De Colle, F. Off-axis emission of short GRB jets from double neutron star mergers and GRB 170817A. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2018, 481, 1597–1608, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1710.06421]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/sty2308

    2018 arXiv

  97. [106]

    The Dynamics and Light Curves of Beamed Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    Rhoads, J.E. The Dynamics and Light Curves of Beamed Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophysical Journal 1999, 525, 737–749, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9903399]. https://doi.org/10.1086/307907

    1999 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Afterglow light curves, viewing angle and the jet structure of γ-ray bursts

    Rossi, E.; Lazzati, D.; Rees, M.J. Afterglow light curves, viewing angle and the jet structure of γ-ray bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2002, 332, 945–950, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0112083]. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.053 63.x

    2002 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows in the Multimessenger Era: Numerical Models and Closure Relations

    Ryan, G.; van Eerten, H.; Piro, L.; Troja, E. Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows in the Multimessenger Era: Numerical Models and Closure Relations. Astrophysical Journal 2020, 896, 166, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1909.11691]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab9 3cf

    2020 arXiv

  100. [109]

    The Structure of Gamma Ray Burst Jets

    Salafia, O.S.; Ghirlanda, G. The Structure of Gamma Ray Burst Jets. Galaxies 2022, 10, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies10050 093

    2022 doi

  101. [110]

    Swift discoveries of new populations of extremely long duration high energy transient

    Levan, A.J. Swift discoveries of new populations of extremely long duration high energy transient. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 2015, 7, 44–55, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1506.03960]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2015.05.004

    2015 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Ioka, K.; Hotokezaka, K.; Piran, T. Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts Caused by Blue Supergiant Collapsars, Newborn Magnetars, or White Dwarf Tidal Disruption Events? Astrophysical Journal 2016, 833, 110, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1608.02938]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/110

    2016 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Can Gamma-ray Burst Jets Break Out the First Stars? Astrophysical Journal 2011, 726, 107, [arXiv:astro- ph.CO/1009.6001]

    Suwa, Y.; Ioka, K. Can Gamma-ray Burst Jets Break Out the First Stars? Astrophysical Journal 2011, 726, 107, [arXiv:astro- ph.CO/1009.6001]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/107

    2011 arXiv

  104. [113]

    Population III Gamma-Ray Bursts and Breakout Criteria for Accretion-powered Jets.Astrophysical Journal 2012, 754, 85, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1104.5691]

    Nagakura, H.; Suwa, Y.; Ioka, K. Population III Gamma-Ray Bursts and Breakout Criteria for Accretion-powered Jets.Astrophysical Journal 2012, 754, 85, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1104.5691]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/85. Version January 6, 2025 submitted to Galaxies 15 of 17

    2012 arXiv

  105. [114]

    The Potential for Detecting Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows from Population III Stars with the Next Generation of Infrared Telescopes

    Macpherson, D.; Coward, D.M.; Zadnik, M.G. The Potential for Detecting Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows from Population III Stars with the Next Generation of Infrared Telescopes. Astrophysical Journal 2013, 779, 73, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1310.4940]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/73

    2013 arXiv

  106. [115]

    Illuminating Massive Black Holes with White Dwarfs: Orbital Dynamics and High-energy Transients from Tidal Interactions

    MacLeod, M.; Goldstein, J.; Ramirez-Ruiz, E.; Guillochon, J.; Samsing, J. Illuminating Massive Black Holes with White Dwarfs: Orbital Dynamics and High-energy Transients from Tidal Interactions. Astrophysical Journal 2014, 794, 9, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1405.1426]. https://doi.or...

    2014 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Physical Processes Shaping Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves: Theoretical Implications from the Swift X-Ray Telescope Observations

    Zhang, B.; Fan, Y.Z.; Dyks, J.; Kobayashi, S.; Mészáros, P .; Burrows, D.N.; Nousek, J.A.; Gehrels, N. Physical Processes Shaping Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves: Theoretical Implications from the Swift X-Ray Telescope Observations. Astrophysical Journal 2006, 642...

    2006 arXiv

  108. [117]

    Delayed Energy Injection Model for Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows.Astrophysical Journal 2013, 779, 28, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1307.4517]

    Geng, J.J.; Wu, X.F.; Huang, Y.F.; Yu, Y.B. Delayed Energy Injection Model for Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows.Astrophysical Journal 2013, 779, 28, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1307.4517]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/28

    2013 arXiv

  109. [118]

    GRB 240529A: A Tale of Two Shocks

    Sun, T.R.; Geng, J.J.; Yan, J.Z.; Hu, Y.D.; Wu, X.F.; Castro-Tirado, A.J.; Yang, C.; Ping, Y.D.; Hu, C.R.; Xu, F.; et al. GRB 240529A: A Tale of Two Shocks. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2024, 976, L20, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2409.17983]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8 213/ad85da

    2024 arXiv

  110. [119]

    Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant Stars: An End-to-end Simulation

    Perna, R.; Lazzati, D.; Cantiello, M. Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts from the Collapse of Blue Supergiant Stars: An End-to-end Simulation. Astrophysical Journal 2018, 859, 48, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1803.04983]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabcc1

    2018 arXiv

  111. [120]

    Magnetorotational collapse of supermassive stars: Black hole formation, gravitational waves, and jets

    Sun, L.; Paschalidis, V .; Ruiz, M.; Shapiro, S.L. Magnetorotational collapse of supermassive stars: Black hole formation, gravitational waves, and jets. Physical Review D 2017, 96, 043006, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1704.04502]. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.043006

    2017 arXiv

  112. [121]

    A self-consistent analytical magnetar model: the luminosity of γ-ray burst supernovae is powered by radioactivity

    Cano, Z.; Johansson Andreas, K.G.; Maeda, K. A self-consistent analytical magnetar model: the luminosity of γ-ray burst supernovae is powered by radioactivity. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2016, 457, 2761–2772, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1601.02610]. https://doi....

    2016 arXiv

  113. [122]

    Black Hole Hyperaccretion Inflow-Outflow Model

    Liu, T.; Song, C.Y.; Zhang, B.; Gu, W.M.; Heger, A. Black Hole Hyperaccretion Inflow-Outflow Model. I. Long and Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2018, 852, 20, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1710.00141]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9 e4f

    2018 arXiv

  114. [123]

    GRB 200612A: An Ultralong Gamma-Ray Burst Powered by Magnetar Spinning Down

    Chen, L.J.; Wang, X.G.; Yang, D.L.; Liang, E.W. GRB 200612A: An Ultralong Gamma-Ray Burst Powered by Magnetar Spinning Down. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 2024, 24, 025017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ad1d2a

    2024 doi

  115. [124]

    Lyons, N.; O’Brien, P .T.; Zhang, B.; Willingale, R.; Troja, E.; Starling, R.L.C. Can X-ray emission powered by a spinning-down magnetar explain some gamma-ray burst light-curve features? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2010, 402, 705–712, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/...

    2010 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Signatures of magnetar central engines in short GRB light curves

    Rowlinson, A.; O’Brien, P .T.; Metzger, B.D.; Tanvir, N.R.; Levan, A.J. Signatures of magnetar central engines in short GRB light curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2013, 430, 1061–1087, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1301.0629]. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts683

    2013 arXiv

  117. [126]

    Magnetar powered GRBs: explaining the extended emission and X-ray plateau of short GRB light curves

    Gompertz, B.P .; O’Brien, P .T.; Wynn, G.A. Magnetar powered GRBs: explaining the extended emission and X-ray plateau of short GRB light curves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014, 438, 240–250, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1311.1505]. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt2165

    2014 arXiv

  118. [127]

    On the Magnetar Origin of the GRBs Presenting X-Ray Afterglow Plateaus

    Stratta, G.; Dainotti, M.G.; Dall’Osso, S.; Hernandez, X.; De Cesare, G. On the Magnetar Origin of the GRBs Presenting X-Ray Afterglow Plateaus. Astrophysical Journal 2018, 869, 155, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1804.08652]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aadd8f

    2018 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Corsi, A.; Mészáros, P . Gamma-ray Burst Afterglow Plateaus and Gravitational Waves: Multi-messenger Signature of a Millisecond Magnetar? Astrophysical Journal 2009, 702, 1171–1178, [arXiv:astro-ph.CO/0907.2290]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/702/ 2/1171

    2009 arXiv

  120. [129]

    The Millisecond Magnetar Central Engine in Short GRBs.Astrophysical Journal 2015, 805, 89, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1501.02589]

    Lü, H.J.; Zhang, B.; Lei, W.H.; Li, Y.; Lasky, P .D. The Millisecond Magnetar Central Engine in Short GRBs.Astrophysical Journal 2015, 805, 89, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1501.02589]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/89

    2015 arXiv

  121. [130]

    Constraining properties of GRB magnetar central engines using the observed plateau luminosity and duration correlation

    Rowlinson, A.; Gompertz, B.P .; Dainotti, M.; O’Brien, P .T.; Wijers, R.A.M.J.; van der Horst, A.J. Constraining properties of GRB magnetar central engines using the observed plateau luminosity and duration correlation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2014, 4...

    2014 arXiv

  122. [131]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow with Continuous Energy Injection: Signature of a Highly Magnetized Millisecond Pulsar

    Zhang, B.; Mészáros, P . Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow with Continuous Energy Injection: Signature of a Highly Magnetized Millisecond Pulsar. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2001, 552, L35–L38, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0011133]. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 320255

    2001 arXiv

  123. [132]

    IMPRINTS OF ELECTRON–POSITRON WINDS ON THE MULTIWAVELENGTH AFTERGLOWS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS

    Geng, J.J.; Wu, X.F.; Huang, Y.F.; Li, L.; Dai, Z.G. IMPRINTS OF ELECTRON–POSITRON WINDS ON THE MULTIWAVELENGTH AFTERGLOWS OF GAMMA-RAY BURSTS. The Astrophysical Journal 2016, 825, 107. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/ 107

    2016 doi

  124. [133]

    GRB 130925A: an ultralong gamma ray burst with a dust-echo afterglow, and implications for the origin of the ultralong GRBs

    Evans, P .A.; Willingale, R.; Osborne, J.P .; O’Brien, P .T.; Tanvir, N.R.; Frederiks, D.D.; Pal’shin, V .D.; Svinkin, D.S.; Lien, A.; Cummings, J.; et al. GRB 130925A: an ultralong gamma ray burst with a dust-echo afterglow, and implications for the origin of the ultralong GR...

    2014 arXiv

  125. [134]

    The First Survey of X-Ray Flares from Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Spectral Properties and Energetics

    Falcone, A.D.; Morris, D.; Racusin, J.; Chincarini, G.; Moretti, A.; Romano, P .; Burrows, D.N.; Pagani, C.; Stroh, M.; Grupe, D.; et al. The First Survey of X-Ray Flares from Gamma-Ray Bursts Observed by Swift: Spectral Properties and Energetics. Astrophysical Journal 2007, 6...

    2007 arXiv

  126. [135]

    X-Ray Hardness Evolution in GRB Afterglows and Flares: Late-Time GRB Activity without N H Variations

    Butler, N.R.; Kocevski, D. X-Ray Hardness Evolution in GRB Afterglows and Flares: Late-Time GRB Activity without N H Variations. Astrophysical Journal 2007, 663, 407–419, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0612564]. https://doi.org/10.1086/518023

    2007 arXiv

  127. [136]

    A Comprehensive Study of Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Emission

    Li, L.; Liang, E.W.; Tang, Q.W.; Chen, J.M.; Xi, S.Q.; Lü, H.J.; Gao, H.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J.; Yi, S.X.; et al. A Comprehensive Study of Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Emission. I. Flares and Early Shallow-decay Component. Astrophysical Journal 2012, 758, 27, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1203...

    2012 arXiv

  128. [137]

    The long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A: detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray burst

    Kumar, H.; Gupta, R.; Saraogi, D.; Ahumada, T.; Andreoni, I.; Anupama, G.C.; Aryan, A.; Barway, S.; Bhalerao, V .; Chandra, P .; et al. The long-active afterglow of GRB 210204A: detection of the most delayed flares in a gamma-ray burst. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomica...

    2022 arXiv

  129. [138]

    X-ray flares and the duration of engine activity in gamma-ray bursts.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2007, 375, L46–L50, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0610730]

    Lazzati, D.; Perna, R. X-ray flares and the duration of engine activity in gamma-ray bursts.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2007, 375, L46–L50, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0610730]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00273.x

    2007 arXiv

  130. [139]

    X-ray flares from propagation instabilities in long gamma-ray burst jets

    Lazzati, D.; Blackwell, C.H.; Morsony, B.J.; Begelman, M.C. X-ray flares from propagation instabilities in long gamma-ray burst jets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2011, 411, L16–L20, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1008.4364]. https://doi.org/10.111 1/j.1745-3933.2010.00984.x

    2011 arXiv

  131. [140]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Flares: Ultraviolet/Optical Flaring

    Swenson, C.A.; Roming, P .W.A.; De Pasquale, M.; Oates, S.R. Gamma-Ray Burst Flares: Ultraviolet/Optical Flaring. I.Astrophysical Journal 2013, 774, 2, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1303.0286]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/2

    2013 arXiv

  132. [141]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Flares: X-Ray Flaring

    Swenson, C.A.; Roming, P .W.A. Gamma-Ray Burst Flares: X-Ray Flaring. II. Astrophysical Journal 2014, 788, 30, [arXiv:astro- ph.HE/1310.2628]. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/30

    2014 arXiv

  133. [142]

    Statistical Analyses of the Energies of X-Ray Plateaus and Flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Yi, S.X.; Du, M.; Liu, T. Statistical Analyses of the Energies of X-Ray Plateaus and Flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2022, 924, 69, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2111.01041]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac35e7

    2022 arXiv

  134. [143]

    A Study of the Overall Evolution Behaviors of Pulses and Flares within Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Zhu, D.; Peng, Z.Y.; Chen, J.M.; Li, T. A Study of the Overall Evolution Behaviors of Pulses and Flares within Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 2023, 948, 23. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbe9f

    2023 doi

  135. [144]

    SVOM: a French/Chinese cooperation for a GRB mission

    Gonzalez, F.; Yu, S. SVOM: a French/Chinese cooperation for a GRB mission. In Proceedings of the Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray; den Herder, J.W.A.; Nikzad, S.; Nakazawa, K., Eds., jul 2018, Vol. 10699, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentat...

    2018 doi

  136. [145]

    The Deep and Transient Universe in the SVOM Era: New Challenges and Opportunities - Scientific prospects of the SVOM mission

    Wei, J.; Cordier, B.; Antier, S.; Antilogus, P .; Atteia, J.L.; Bajat, A.; Basa, S.; Beckmann, V .; Bernardini, M.G.; Boissier, S.; et al. The Deep and Transient Universe in the SVOM Era: New Challenges and Opportunities - Scientific prospects of the SVOM mission. arXiv e-prin...

    2016 doi arXiv

  137. [146]

    Ultra-Long Gamma-Ray Bursts detection with SVOM/ECLAIRs

    Dagoneau, N.; Schanne, S.; Atteia, J.L.; Götz, D.; Cordier, B. Ultra-Long Gamma-Ray Bursts detection with SVOM/ECLAIRs. Experimental Astronomy 2020, 50, 91–123, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2005.12560]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-020-09665-w

    2020 arXiv

  138. [147]

    The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected performances

    Amati, L.; O’Brien, P .; Götz, D.; Bozzo, E.; Tenzer, C.; Frontera, F.; Ghirlanda, G.; Labanti, C.; Osborne, J.P .; Stratta, G.; et al. The THESEUS space mission concept: science case, design and expected performances. Advances in Space Research 2018, 62, 191–244, [arXiv:astro...

    2018 arXiv

  139. [148]

    Multi-messenger astrophysics with THESEUS in the 2030s

    Ciolfi, R.; Stratta, G.; Branchesi, M.; Gendre, B.; Grimm, S.; Harms, J.; Lamb, G.P .; Martin-Carrillo, A.; McCann, A.; Oganesyan, G.; et al. Multi-messenger astrophysics with THESEUS in the 2030s. Experimental Astronomy 2021, 52, 245–275, [arXiv:astro- ph.IM/2104.09534]. http...

    2021 arXiv

  140. [149]

    THESEUS: A key space mission concept for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics

    Stratta, G.; Ciolfi, R.; Amati, L.; Bozzo, E.; Ghirlanda, G.; Maiorano, E.; Nicastro, L.; Rossi, A.; Vinciguerra, S.; Frontera, F.; et al. THESEUS: A key space mission concept for Multi-Messenger Astrophysics. Advances in Space Research 2018, 62, 662–682, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/17...

    2018 arXiv

  141. [150]

    Radio Time-Domain Signatures of Magnetar Birth

    Law, C.; Margalit, B.; Palliyaguru, N.T.; Metzger, B.D.; Sironi, L.; Zheng, Y.; Berger, E.; Margutti, R.; Beloborodov, A.; Nicholl, M.; et al. Radio Time-Domain Signatures of Magnetar Birth. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 2019, 51, 319, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1903.0...

    2019 doi arXiv

  142. [151]

    Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays

    Waxman, E. Cosmological Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays. Physics Revue Letters 1995, 75, 386–389, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9505082]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.386

    1995 arXiv

  143. [152]

    The Acceleration of Ultra–High-Energy Cosmic Rays in Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Vietri, M. The Acceleration of Ultra–High-Energy Cosmic Rays in Gamma-Ray Bursts. Astrophysical Journal 1995, 453, 883, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9506081]. https://doi.org/10.1086/176448

    1995 arXiv

  144. [153]

    High Energy Neutrinos from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Burst Fireballs

    Waxman, E.; Bahcall, J. High Energy Neutrinos from Cosmological Gamma-Ray Burst Fireballs. Physics Revue Letters 1997, 78, 2292–2295, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/9701231]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2292

    1997 arXiv

  145. [154]

    Neutrinos from the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst? Astrophysical Journal Letters 2022, 941, L10, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2210.15625]

    Murase, K.; Mukhopadhyay, M.; Kheirandish, A.; Kimura, S.S.; Fang, K. Neutrinos from the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst? Astrophysical Journal Letters 2022, 941, L10, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2210.15625]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aca3ae

    2022 arXiv

  146. [155]

    Limits on Neutrino Emission from GRB 221009A from MeV to PeV Using the IceCube Neutrino Observatory

    Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Agarwalla, S.K.; Aggarwal, N.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Amin, N.M.; Andeen, K.; et al. Limits on Neutrino Emission from GRB 221009A from MeV to PeV Using the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. Astrophysical Journal Letters 2...

    2023

  147. [156]

    Search for 10–1000 GeV Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts with IceCube

    Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Agarwalla, S.K.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Amin, N.M.; Andeen, K.; Anton, G.; et al. Search for 10–1000 GeV Neutrinos from Gamma-Ray Bursts with IceCube. Astrophysical Journal 2024, 964, 126, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2312.1151...

    2024

  148. [157]

    IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe

    Aartsen, M.G.; Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Alispach, C.; Allison, P .; Amin, N.M.; et al. IceCube-Gen2: the window to the extreme Universe. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics 2021, 48, 060501, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2008.04323]. h...

    2021

  149. [158]

    Prospects for Observing Astrophysical Transients with GeV Neutrinos

    Partenheimer, A.; Thwaites, J.; Fang, K.; Vandenbroucke, J.; Metzger, B.D. Prospects for Observing Astrophysical Transients with GeV Neutrinos. arXiv e-prints 2024, p. arXiv:2412.05087, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2412.05087]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.0 5087

    2024 doi

  150. [159]

    Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: an advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy

    Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Aleksi´ c, J.; Aliu, E.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Antico, F.; Antonelli, L.A.; et al. Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: an advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. Experim...

    2011 arXiv

  151. [160]

    High-Energy Neutrinos and Cosmic Rays from Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts? Astrophysical Journal Letters 2006, 651, L5–L8, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0607104]

    Murase, K.; Ioka, K.; Nagataki, S.; Nakamura, T. High-Energy Neutrinos and Cosmic Rays from Low-Luminosity Gamma-Ray Bursts? Astrophysical Journal Letters 2006, 651, L5–L8, [arXiv:astro-ph/astro-ph/0607104]. https://doi.org/10.1086/509323

    2006 arXiv

  152. [161]

    Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies

    Alves Batista, R.; Biteau, J.; Bustamante, M.; Dolag, K.; Engel, R.; Fang, K.; Kampert, K.H.; Kostunin, D.; Mostafa, M.; Murase, K.; et al. Open Questions in Cosmic-Ray Research at Ultrahigh Energies. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 2019, 6, 23, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/19...

    2019 arXiv

  153. [162]

    Constraints on the ultra-high energy cosmic ray output of gamma-ray bursts

    Moore, E.; Gendre, B.; Orange, N.B.; Panther, F.H. Constraints on the ultra-high energy cosmic ray output of gamma-ray bursts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2024, 530, 555–559, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2303.13781]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stae873

    2024

  154. [163]

    The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory

    Punturo, M.; Abernathy, M.; Acernese, F.; Allen, B.; Andersson, N.; Arun, K.; Barone, F.; Barr, B.; Barsuglia, M.; Beker, M.; et al. The Einstein Telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2010, 27, 194002. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2010 doi

  155. [164]

    Neutron Star Extreme Matter Observatory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network

    Ackley, K.; Adya, V .B.; Agrawal, P .; Altin, P .; Ashton, G.; Bailes, M.; Baltinas, E.; Barbuio, A.; Beniwal, D.; Blair, C.; et al. Neutron Star Extreme Matter Observatory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network. Publication of the Astronomical Soc...

    2020

  156. [165]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Amaro-Seoane, P .; Audley, H.; Babak, S.; Baker, J.; Barausse, E.; Bender, P .; Berti, E.; Binetruy, P .; Born, M.; Bortoluzzi, D.; et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints 2017, p. arXiv:1702.00786, [arXiv:astro-ph.IM/1702.00786]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arX...

    2017 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.