REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Ultra-long Gamma-Ray Bursts different?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The discovery of a number of gamma-ray bursts with duration exceeding 1,000 seconds, in particular the exceptional case of GRB 111209A with a duration of about 25,000 seconds, has opened the question on whether these bursts form a new class of sources, the so called {\em ultra-long} GRBs, or if they are rather the tail of the distribution of the standard long GRB duration. In this Letter, using the long GRB sample detected by {\em Swift}, we investigate on the statistical properties of ultra-long GRBs and compare them with the overall long burst population. We discuss also on the differences observed in their spectral properties. We find that ultra-long GRBs are statistically different from the standard long GRBs with typical burst duration less than 100-500 seconds, for which a Wolf Rayet star progenitor is usually invoked. We interpret this result as an indication that an alternative scenario has to be found in order to explain the ultra-long GRB extreme energetics, as well as the mass reservoir and its size that can feed the central engine for such a long time.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A review of long lasting activities of the central engine of gamma-ray bursts
A review of ultra-long gamma-ray bursts and X-ray plateau phases as evidence that the central engine keeps working long after the first flash.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.