Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 74 references

Femtosecond temperature measurements of laser-shocked copper deduced from the intensity of the x-ray thermal diffuse scattering

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single femtosecond x-ray diffraction pattern can read the temperature of laser-shocked copper from the intensity of thermal diffuse scattering between Bragg peaks.

desk verdict A genuinely useful proof-of-principle for single-shot TDS thermometry in shocked metals; the defect-scattering caveat is real but doesn't sink the core result. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02940 v1 pith:TQSLSMPQ submitted 2025-01-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

J. S. Wark , D. J. Peake , T. Stevens , P. G. Heighway , Y. Ping , P. Sterne , B. Albertazzi , S. J. Ali
show 117 more authors
L. Antonelli M. R. Armstrong C. Baehtz O. B. Ball S. Banerjee A. B. Belonoshko C. A. Bolme V. Bouffetier R. Briggs K. Buakor T. Butcher S. Di Dio Cafiso V. Cerantola J. Chantel A. Di Cicco A. L. Coleman J. Collier G. Collins A. J. Comley F. Coppari T. E. Cowan G. Cristoforetti H. Cynn A. Descamps F. Dorchies M. J. Duff A. Dwivedi C. Edwards J. H. Eggert D. Errandonea G. Fiquet E. Galtier A. Laso Garcia H. Ginestet L. Gizzi A. Gleason S. Goede J. M. Gonzalez M. G. Gorman M. Harmand N. Hartley C. Hernandez-Gomez A. Higginbotham H. Höppner O. S. Humphries R. J. Husband T. M. Hutchinson H. Hwang D. A. Keen J. Kim P. Koester Z. Konopkova D. Kraus A. Krygier L. Labate A. E. Lazicki Y. Lee H-P. Liermann P. Mason M. Masruri B. Massani E. E. McBride C. McGuire J. D. McHardy D. McGonegle R. S. McWilliams S. Merkel G. Morard B. Nagler M. Nakatsutsumi K. Nguyen-Cong A-M. Norton I. I. Oleynik C. Otzen N. Ozaki S. Pandolfi A. Pelka K. A. Pereira J. P. Phillips C. Prescher T. Preston L. Randolph D. Ranjan A. Ravasio R. Redmer J. Rips D. Santamaria-Perez D. J. Savage M. Schoelmerich J-P. Schwinkendorf S. Singh J. Smith R. F. Smith A. Sollier J. Spear C. Spindloe M. Stevenson C. Strohm T-A. Suer M. Tang M. Toncian T. Toncian S. J. Tracy A. Trapananti T. Tschentscher M. Tyldesley C. E. Vennari T. Vinci S. C. Vogel T. J. Volz J. Vorberger J. T. Willman L. Wollenweber U. Zastrau E. Brambrink K. Appel M. I. McMahon
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords thermaldiffusescatteringDebye-Wallerfactorshock-compressedcoppersingle-shottemperaturemeasurementx-rayfree-electronlaserequationofstatetextureinsensitivityHugoniot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a way to measure temperature in laser-shocked copper from a single femtosecond x-ray diffraction pattern, with no spectral resolution. The claim is that the absolute intensity of thermal diffuse scattering (TDS) -- the inelastic scattering of x-rays by thermally vibrating atoms -- between the Bragg peaks, averaged over azimuthal angle, is largely insensitive to the grain texture that ruins Bragg-peak intensity ratios, and so gives a direct readout of the Debye-Waller factor, i.e. of $T/\Theta_D^2$. Fitting the classic Warren model, including multi-phonon terms, to single 50-fs shots with more than 80% of the target shocked yields temperatures around 800 K at $V/V_0 = 0.8$ and above 3000 K at $V/V_0 = 0.7$, matching the SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290 equations of state within experimental error. If correct, this provides x-ray free-electron laser facilities with a relatively simple single-shot temperature diagnostic for dynamically compressed solids.

What carries the argument

The central object is Warren's theory of thermal diffuse scattering from an fcc polycrystal, together with Borie's approximation for multi-phonon scattering. In this theory the first-order TDS at a point in reciprocal space is obtained by summing, over all Polanyi spheres (the spherical surfaces of allowed reciprocal-lattice vectors), the phonon wavevectors that connect those spheres to the scattering point within a spherical Brillouin zone of radius $q_B = (2\pi/a)(3/\pi)^{1/3}$; its strength is set by the Debye-Waller factor $2M = (12 h^2/m k_B)(T/\Theta_D^2)(\sin\theta/\lambda)^2$. The paper's texture-modified version computes the Polanyi-sphere weightings from a $\beta$-fiber orientation distribution, and shows numerically that the azimuthally averaged TDS is nearly unaffected by texture because it averages over many points on each sphere. Borie's formula supplies the higher-order ($\ell \ge 2$) phonon contributions needed to match the scattering at large $2\theta$.

What would settle it

Shock a textured copper foil while independently measuring its orientation distribution (for example by resolving individual grain reflections or comparing separate azimuthal sectors on the same shot) and check whether the inter-Bragg TDS stays within about 5% as the texture changes under compression; if the TDS variation approaches the 200-300% thermal signal, the claim is falsified. A cross-check would be to compare TDS-inferred temperatures with EXAFS or spectrally resolved inelastic scattering on the same Hugoniot points.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the azimuthally averaged intensity of the inelastic TDS between Bragg peaks of a strongly textured polycrystal is, to within a few percent, the same as that of a random powder, even when compression changes the texture, whereas the elastic Bragg peak intensities change drastically. The authors reach this conclusion by adapting Warren's classic TDS theory to integrate scattering over a $\beta$-fiber orientation distribution, finding texture-induced TDS changes below 5%, small compared with the factor 2-3 increase in TDS seen on shock compression. They then fit this model, with Borie's approximation for higher-order phonon scattering, to three inter-Bragg regions of 18 keV, 50-fs single-shot diffraction patterns, correcting for Compton scattering, the Kapton ablator, the unshocked rear copper layer, and x-ray absorption. The extracted Debye-Waller factors imply Hugoniot temperatures of about 800 K at $V/V_0 = 0.8$ and over 3000 K at $V/V_0 = 0.7$, in agreement with the SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290 equations of state. The same data show that at the highest compressions the high-order Bragg peaks are dominated by TDS, so elastic-only Debye-Waller analysis would fail even in the absence of texture.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the real shocked copper's evolving grain orientations change the azimuthally averaged thermal diffuse scattering by far less than the factor 2-3 thermal signal; the supporting test so far uses only a simple model of texture evolution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single 50-fs x-ray pulse at an FEL can serve as a shock-temperature gauge for mid-Z metals, with no spectrometer and no need to resolve Stokes from anti-Stokes scattering.
  • Temperature extraction no longer requires a texture-free or single-crystal target, removing the main obstacle that previously made Debye-Waller thermometry unreliable in shocked polycrystals.
  • The measured $T/\Theta_D^2$ values along the Hugoniot provide a direct test of thermal equations of state such as SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290.
  • At high compression the high-order Bragg peaks are mostly TDS, so any attempt to use elastic peak intensities for temperature must include the TDS contribution even if texture is not an issue.
  • Because the measurement fixes $T/\Theta_D^2$, converting it to temperature needs a model of $\Theta_D$ under compression, the same reliance that the EXAFS method has on interatomic potentials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the texture insensitivity persists for other fabrication routes and shock geometries, the method could become a general single-shot thermometer that needs no orientation-distribution characterization at all.
  • At temperatures well below $\Theta_D$, the TDS profile depends separately on $T/\Theta_D$ and $T/\Theta_D^2$, so the same observable might disentangle temperature from Debye temperature for cryogenic or quasi-isentropic samples; the authors flag this direction.
  • Pairing this measurement with a coarsely resolved inelastic x-ray scattering measurement of the maximum phonon energy could give an absolute temperature without assuming an equation of state for $\Theta_D$.
  • For low-Z or strongly plastic materials the Compton and ablator backgrounds will grow relative to the TDS signal, so the practical window may be mid- to high-Z targets at high photon energies; the ablator choice should be optimized accordingly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports single-shot, 50 fs x-ray scattering measurements of laser-shocked copper at the EuXFEL HED instrument, and uses the absolute intensity of the azimuthally averaged thermal diffuse scattering (TDS) between Bragg peaks to extract the Debye-Waller factor 2M and hence T/Theta_D^2. The authors model the diffuse signal with the Warren/Borie TDS formalism, correct for polarization, solid angle, attenuation, Kapton ablator scattering, and Compton scattering, and compare the inferred temperatures along the Hugoniot with the SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290 equations of state, finding agreement within error. They also present a numerical texture model showing that the azimuthally averaged TDS is far less sensitive to grain texture than the elastic Bragg intensities, which motivates the method as a practical temperature diagnostic at XFELs.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this is a significant methodological advance: it would provide a single-shot, spectrally unresolved temperature measurement for dynamically compressed matter at XFEL facilities, complementing EXAFS-based approaches that require separate bright x-ray sources. The paper is careful in several respects: the ambient data are fit well by the Warren model, the Compton and Kapton contributions are explicitly modeled and subtracted, the attenuation and shock-fraction corrections are documented in detail in the Supplementary Material, and the data are publicly archived. The texture-insensitivity argument, while based on a simple plasticity model, is a useful and nontrivial numerical check. However, the central quantitative claim rests on the assumption that all inter-Bragg diffuse intensity in the shocked state is thermal TDS, and this assumption is not isolated in the data; the temperature comparison is also partially dependent on the same equations of state used to supply the Debye temperature. These issues are addressable but are load-bearing for the stated conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 7, Eq. (S36)] The shocked-state diffuse intensity is never separated into thermal and defect-induced contributions. The three fitting windows, between (200)/(220), (220)/(311), and (222)/(400), sample different phonon wavevectors through the Warren kernel W(k) in Eq. (S27), so a non-thermal defect contribution such as Huang scattering or Stokes-Wilson tails would bias the fitted 2M differently in each window. The paper reports only combined fits, and the ambient-data check in Fig. 3 does not constrain the defect population in the shocked sample, which the introduction itself notes is potentially copious under shock. Please report the per-window fitted 2M values as a consistency check, or otherwise model/estimate the defect scattering; without this, the central claim that the inter-Bragg intensity provides a reliable measure of T/Theta_D^2 is not fully established.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 9, Eq. (1)] The conversion from 2M to temperature uses compression-dependent Debye temperatures from SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290, the same equations of state whose Hugoniot temperatures are the benchmark for comparison. The agreement in Fig. 9 is therefore partly built into the analysis, as the authors partly acknowledge in the Discussion. The 311 K rescaling in Fig. 9(c,d) is a useful sensitivity test, but it does not vary the compression dependence of Theta_D. Please quantify how the inferred temperatures change under a plausible uncertainty band for Theta_D(V), and state explicitly which part of the EOS comparison is genuinely independent of the model used to extract the temperature.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the typo 'radation'; it should read 'radiation'.
  2. [Section III] In the paragraph describing the fitting windows, 'midway between the (220)/(220) peaks' appears to be a typo; the intended first window is between the (200) and (220) peaks.
  3. [Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is presented as the high-temperature limit of the Debye-Waller factor, but the text does not state this explicitly at the point of introduction; the full expression including the Debye function appears later in Eq. (S21). Please add a sentence near Eq. (1) clarifying the limit.
  4. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption states the 'surface normal inclined at 22.5° to the incident x-rays,' while the text in Section II defines the x-ray incidence angle omega = 22.5° to the target normal; please make the wording consistent so the geometry is unambiguous.
  5. [Supplementary Material, Sec. S1.C] The Python library name 'pyFAI' is typeset with an erroneous space in several places; please correct 'pyF AI' to 'pyFAI'.
  6. [Reference 45] The author name in Reference 45 appears as 'GrKünert'; this should be 'Grünert'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fitted Debye-Waller factor is measured independently of the EOS, which enters only in the final T/Theta_D^2 to T conversion.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at the point that matters. The measured quantity is the inter-Bragg TDS intensity, normalized by the XGM flux and corrected for absorption, Kapton scattering, Compton scattering, and residual ambient copper. A least-squares fit of the Warren/Borie TDS model to three inter-Bragg windows (Sec. III, Fig. 7) yields the Debye-Waller factor 2M as a free parameter, and Eq. (1) gives T/Theta_D^2 without any EOS input. The EOS enters only after the fact, to convert the measured ratio into a temperature via the compression-dependent Theta_D, and the paper explicitly acknowledges this reliance ('we are essentially measuring T/Theta_D^2, and thus are reliant on a model of Theta_D under compression' and 'we are still reliant on their predictions of the Debye temperature (or Grueneisen parameter) to make this claim'). Because the fitted 2M is independent of the EOS, the agreement with the SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290 Hugoniot temperatures is a nontrivial consistency check of the measured ratio against the EOS ratio, not a tautology. The texture-insensitivity claim rests on a numerical integration of the Warren model over a beta-fiber ODF (Fig. 5), which is an explicit model calculation rather than a circular assumption. Self-citations (Refs. 35, 43, 51) are contextual and not load-bearing. The skeptic's defect-scattering concern is a validity threat that could bias the inferred 2M, but it is not a circularity; the paper does not define the TDS signal in terms of the quantity it claims to predict. Overall, no circular step is exhibited by the paper's own equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Warren/Borie TDS model, the assumption that the inter-Bragg diffuse signal from shocked Cu is dominated by TDS, the texture insensitivity of the azimuthally averaged TDS, and the EOS-provided Debye temperature. No invented entities are introduced. A shape-function width R appears in the illustrative elastic model (Eq. S30) but does not enter the TDS fit that supports the central claim, so it is not listed as a free parameter.

free parameters (2)
  • Debye-Waller factor 2M (fitted per shot) = approx 0.2 to 0.55 across the six shots (Fig. 8)
    The central observable, extracted by least-squares fitting the Warren model to the inter-Bragg TDS intensity in three windows.
  • Shock mass fraction x = 0.95, 0.96, 0.94, 0.80, 0.89, 0.91 for runs r0911, r0906, r0892, r1077, r1078, r1104
    Fitted by minimizing the difference between modeled and measured ambient Bragg peak intensities; determines the shocked-fraction correction to the TDS signal.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Warren model of TDS (spherical Brillouin zone, linear phonon dispersion, Debye-Waller factor) describes the inter-Bragg scattering of shocked Cu.
    Used to fit 2M in the three inter-Bragg windows; the good ambient fit supports it, but shocked-state phonons may deviate.
  • domain assumption Borie's approximation for higher-order TDS, Eq. (S36), is accurate.
    Needed for the all-order TDS at high 2θ; the paper notes the first-order model underestimates high-angle scattering.
  • domain assumption Azimuthally averaged TDS is insensitive to texture for the actual shocked samples.
    Validated numerically only for a β-fiber ODF with 5° spread and a simple plasticity model; the experimental samples show large texture variations that change upon compression.
  • domain assumption The compression-dependent Debye temperature Θ_D(V) from SESAME 3336 or LEOS 290 is correct.
    Temperatures are derived from the measured 2M using these Θ_D values, and the same EOS predictions are the comparison benchmark; a wrong Θ_D biases the inferred temperature.
  • domain assumption Kapton ablator scattering is structureless and pressure-independent in the measurement region.
    Ablator subtraction uses ambient and one shocked Kapton measurement; the paper assumes the shocked Kapton signal applies at all pressures.
  • domain assumption The shocked Cu is a uniform fcc phase whose lattice parameter measured by diffraction gives the specific volume V/V0.
    Uniaxial shock strain and texture could bias the volume inferred from a single lattice parameter; the analysis does not model elastic-plastic anisotropy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Femtosecond temperature measurements of laser-shocked copper deduced from the intensity of the x-ray thermal diffuse scattering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TQSLSMPQ

@misc{pith2026250102940,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Femtosecond temperature measurements of laser-shocked copper deduced from the intensity of the x-ray thermal diffuse scattering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TQSLSMPQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02940}
}
abstract

We present 50-fs, single-shot measurements of the x-ray thermal diffuse scattering (TDS) from copper foils that have been shocked via nanosecond laser-ablation up to pressures above 135~GPa. We hence deduce the x-ray Debye-Waller (DW) factor, providing a temperature measurement. The targets were laser-shocked with the DiPOLE 100-X laser at the High Energy Density (HED) endstation of the European X-ray Free-Electron Laser (EuXFEL). Single x-ray pulses, with a photon energy of 18 keV, were scattered from the samples and recorded on Varex detectors. Despite the targets being highly textured (as evinced by large variations in the elastic scattering), and with such texture changing upon compression, the absolute intensity of the azimuthally averaged inelastic TDS between the Bragg peaks is largely insensitive to these changes, and, allowing for both Compton scattering and the low-level scattering from a sacrificial ablator layer, provides a reliable measurement of $T/\Theta_D^2$, where $\Theta_D$ is the Debye temperature. We compare our results with the predictions of the SESAME 3336 and LEOS 290 equations of state for copper, and find good agreement within experimental errors. We thus demonstrate that single-shot temperature measurements of dynamically compressed materials can be made via thermal diffuse scattering of XFEL radation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02940 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Experimental setup at the High Energy Density (HED) scientific instrument. Ablatively driven shock waves are [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Diffraction data collected on the Varex detectors on an unshocked copper sample. The intensity is corrected for x-ray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Diffraction signal from an unshocked 25- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Total simulated diffraction from an unshocked 25- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The x-ray diffraction pattern from a sample shock [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The calculated azimuthally integrated elastic x-ray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Overview of the exemplary dataset – including only those shots for which the shock fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The Debye-Waller (DW) factor, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Temperature as a function of compression for: (a) those data shots where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coppari , author R

    author author F. Coppari , author R. F. \ Smith , author J. H. \ Eggert , author J. Wang , author J. R. \ Rygg , author A. Lazicki , author J. A. \ Hawreliak , author G. W. \ Collins , \ and\ author T. S. \ Duffy ,\ 10.1038/ngeo1948 journal journal Nature Geoscience \ volume 6 ,\ pages 926 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/ngeo1948

  2. [2]

    author author R. F. \ Smith , author J. H. \ Eggert , author R. Jeanloz , author T. S. \ Duffy , author D. G. \ Braun , author J. R. \ Patterson , author R. E. \ Rudd , author J. Biener , author A. E. \ Lazicki , author A. V. \ Hamza , author J. Wang , author T. Braun , author L. X. \ Benedict , author P. M. \ Celliers , \ and\ author G. W. \ Collins ,\ 1...

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13526

  3. [3]

    Lazicki , author D

    author author A. Lazicki , author D. McGonegle , author J. R. \ Rygg , author D. G. \ Braun , author D. C. \ Swift , author M. G. \ Gorman , author R. F. \ Smith , author P. G. \ Heighway , author A. Higginbotham , author M. J. \ Suggit , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author F. Coppari , author C. E. \ Wehrenberg , author R. G. \ Kraus , author D. Erskine ...

  4. [4]

    author author J. S. \ Wark , author M. I. \ McMahon , \ and\ author J. H. \ Eggert ,\ 10.1063/5.0089388 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 080902 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0089388 2022

  5. [5]

    author author J. S. \ Wark , author R. R. \ Whitlock , author A. Hauer , author J. E. \ Swain , \ and\ author P. J. \ Solone ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.9391 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 35 ,\ pages 9391 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.35.9391 1987

  6. [6]

    author author J. S. \ Wark , author R. R. \ Whitlock , author A. A. \ Hauer , author J. E. \ Swain , \ and\ author P. J. \ Solone ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.5705 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 40 ,\ pages 5705 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.40.5705 1989

  7. [7]

    Loveridge-Smith , author A

    author author A. Loveridge-Smith , author A. Allen , author J. Belak , author T. Boehly , author A. Hauer , author B. Holian , author D. Kalantar , author G. Kyrala , author R. W. \ Lee , author P. Lomdahl , author M. A. \ Meyers , author D. Paisley , author S. Pollaine , author B. Remington , author D. C. \ Swift , author S. Weber , \ and\ author J. S. \...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.2349

  8. [8]

    author author S. J. \ Turneaure \ and\ author Y. M. \ Gupta ,\ 10.1063/1.2814067 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 91 ,\ pages 201913 ( year 2007 a ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2814067 2007

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    author author S. J. \ Turneaure \ and\ author Y. M. \ Gupta ,\ 10.1063/1.2436638 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 90 ,\ pages 051905 ( year 2007 b ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  2. [10]

    author author J. R. \ Rygg , author J. H. \ Eggert , author A. E. \ Lazicki , author F. Coppari , author J. A. \ Hawreliak , author D. G. \ Hicks , author R. F. \ Smith , author C. M. \ Sorce , author T. M. \ Uphaus , author B. Yaakobi , \ and\ author G. W. \ Collins ,\ 10.106...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Suggit , author A

    author author M. Suggit , author A. Higginbotham , author G. Mogni , author G. Kimminau , author P. Dunne , author A. Comley , author N. Park , author B. Remington , \ and\ author J. Wark ,\ 10.1038/ncomms2225 journal journal Nature communications \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1224 ( ye...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Milathianaki , author S

    author author D. Milathianaki , author S. Boutet , author G. J. \ Williams , author A. Higginbotham , author D. Ratner , author A. E. \ Gleason , author M. Messerschmidt , author M. M. \ Seibert , author D. C. \ Swift , author P. Hering , author J. Robinson , author W. E. \ Wh...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Lazicki , author J

    author author A. Lazicki , author J. R. \ Rygg , author F. Coppari , author R. Smith , author D. Fratanduono , author R. G. \ Kraus , author G. W. \ Collins , author R. Briggs , author D. G. \ Braun , author D. C. \ Swift , \ and\ author J. H. \ Eggert ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.1...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author A. E. \ Gleason , author C. A. \ Bolme , author H. J. \ Lee , author B. Nagler , author E. Galtier , author D. Milathianaki , author J. Hawreliak , author R. G. \ Kraus , author J. H. \ Eggert , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author G. W. \ Collins , author R. Sand...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Denoeud , author N

    author author A. Denoeud , author N. Ozaki , author A. Benuzzi-Mounaix , author H. Uranishi , author Y. Kondo , author R. Kodama , author E. Brambrink , author A. Ravasio , author M. Bocoum , author J.-M. \ Boudenne , author M. Harmand , author F. Guyot , author S. Mazevet , a...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Wang , author F

    author author J. Wang , author F. Coppari , author R. F. \ Smith , author J. H. \ Eggert , author A. E. \ Lazicki , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author J. R. \ Rygg , author T. R. \ Boehly , author G. W. \ Collins , \ and\ author T. S. \ Duffy ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.104102 jou...

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author S. J. \ Turneaure , author N. Sinclair , \ and\ author Y. M. \ Gupta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.045502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 045502 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    author author C. E. \ Wehrenberg , author D. McGonegle , author C. Bolme , author A. Higginbotham , author A. Lazicki , author H. J. \ Lee , author B. Nagler , author H.-S. \ Park , author B. A. \ Remington , author R. E. \ Rudd , author M. Sliwa , author M. Suggit , author D....

    doi

  11. [19]

    author author D. N. \ Polsin , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author J. R. \ Rygg , author A. Lazicki , author R. F. \ Smith , author J. H. \ Eggert , author M. C. \ Gregor , author B. J. \ Henderson , author X. Gong , author J. A. \ Delettrez , author R. G. \ Kraus , author P. ...

    doi

  12. [20]

    author author J. K. \ Wicks , author R. F. \ Smith , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author F. Coppari , author R. G. \ Kraus , author M. G. \ Newman , author J. R. \ Rygg , author J. H. \ Eggert , \ and\ author T. S. \ Duffy ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.aao5864 journal journal Science Adva...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author S. M. \ Sharma , author S. J. \ Turneaure , author J. M. \ Winey , author P. A. \ Rigg , author N. Sinclair , author X. Wang , author Y. Toyoda , \ and\ author Y. M. \ Gupta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.011010 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 011010 ( ...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Seager , author M

    author author S. Seager , author M. Kuchner , author C. A. \ Hier-Majumder , \ and\ author B. Militzer ,\ 10.1086/521346 journal journal The Astrophysical Journal \ volume 669 ,\ pages 1279 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  15. [23]

    Jeanloz , author P

    author author R. Jeanloz , author P. M. \ Celliers , author G. W. \ Collins , author J. H. \ Eggert , author K. K. M. \ Lee , author R. S. \ McWilliams , author S. Brygoo , \ and\ author P. Loubeyre ,\ 10.1073/pnas.0608170104 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Valencia , author R

    author author D. Valencia , author R. J. \ O'Connell , \ and\ author D. D. \ Sasselov ,\ 10.1007/s10509-009-0034-6 journal journal Astrophysics and Space Science \ volume 322 ,\ pages 135 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    author author C. J. \ Pickard \ and\ author R. J. \ Needs ,\ 10.1038/nmat2796 journal journal Nature Materials \ volume 9 ,\ pages 624 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    Helled \ and\ author T

    author author R. Helled \ and\ author T. Guillot ,\ title Internal structure of giant and icy planets: Importance of heavy elements and mixing , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-319-30648-3_44-1 booktitle Handbook of Exoplanets ,\ editor edited by\ editor H. J. \ Deeg \ and\ editor J. A. \...

    doi

  19. [27]

    author author T. S. \ Duffy \ and\ author R. F. \ Smith ,\ 10.3389/feart.2019.00023 journal journal Frontiers in Earth Science \ volume 7 ,\ pages 23 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019

  20. [28]

    author author L. M. \ Barker \ and\ author R. E. \ Hollenbach ,\ 10.1063/1.1660986 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 43 ,\ pages 4669 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  21. [29]

    author author P. M. \ Celliers , author D. K. \ Bradley , author G. W. \ Collins , author D. G. \ Hicks , author T. R. \ Boehly , \ and\ author W. J. \ Armstrong ,\ 10.1063/1.1807008 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 75 ,\ pages 4916 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    \ and\ author Mabire, C

    author author Hereil, P.-L. \ and\ author Mabire, C. ,\ 10.1051/jp4:20009132 journal journal J. Phys. IV France \ volume 10 ,\ pages Pr9 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author D. A. \ Brantley , author R. S. \ Crum , \ and\ author M. C. \ Akin ,\ 10.1063/5.0026053 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 129 ,\ pages 015903 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    Ping , author F

    author author Y. Ping , author F. Coppari , author D. G. \ Hicks , author B. Yaakobi , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author S. Hamel , author J. H. \ Eggert , author J. R. \ Rygg , author R. F. \ Smith , author D. C. \ Swift , author D. G. \ Braun , author T. R. \ Boehly , \ an...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Ping \ and\ author F

    author author Y. Ping \ and\ author F. Coppari ,\ 10.1080/08957959.2016.1196203 journal journal High Pressure Research \ volume 36 ,\ pages 303 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  26. [34]

    Sio , author A

    author author H. Sio , author A. Krygier , author D. G. \ Braun , author R. E. \ Rudd , author S. A. \ Bonev , author F. Coppari , author M. Millot , author D. E. \ Fratanduono , author N. Bhandarkar , author M. Bitter , author D. K. \ Bradley , author P. C. \ Efthimion , auth...

  27. [35]

    author author W. J. \ Murphy , author A. Higginbotham , author J. S. \ Wark , \ and\ author N. Park ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.014109 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 78 ,\ pages 014109 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    author author S. M. \ Sharma \ and\ author Y. M. \ Gupta ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.064113 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 104 ,\ pages 064113 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    author author E. E. \ McBride , author T. G. \ White , author A. Descamps , author L. B. \ Fletcher , author K. Appel , author F. P. \ Condamine , author C. B. \ Curry , author F. Dallari , author S. Funk , author E. Galtier , author M. Gauthier , author S. Goede , author J. B...

  30. [38]

    Descamps , author B

    author author A. Descamps , author B. K. \ Ofori-Okai , author K. Appel , author V. Cerantola , author A. Comley , author J. H. \ Eggert , author L. B. \ Fletcher , author D. O. \ Gericke , author S. G \"o de , author O. Humphries , author O. Karnbach , author A. Lazicki , aut...

  31. [39]

    Wollenweber , author T

    author author L. Wollenweber , author T. R. \ Preston , author A. Descamps , author V. Cerantola , author A. Comley , author J. H. \ Eggert , author L. B. \ Fletcher , author G. Geloni , author D. O. \ Gericke , author S. H. \ Glenzer , author S. G\" o de , author J. Hastings ...

  32. [40]

    author author B. E. \ Warren , author B. L. \ Averbach , \ and\ author B. W. \ Roberts ,\ 10.1063/1.1699898 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 22 ,\ pages 1493 ( year 1951 ) NoStop

    1951 doi

  33. [41]

    author author B. E. \ Warren ,\ 10.1107/S0365110X53002271 journal journal Acta Crystallographica \ volume 6 ,\ pages 803 ( year 1953 ) NoStop

    1953 doi

  34. [42]

    author author A. A. B. \ L. V. Al'tshuler , S. B. Kormer \ and\ author R. F. \ Trunin ,\ http://jetp.ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_011_03_0573.pdf journal journal J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.) \ volume 38 ,\ pages 790 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    1960

  35. [43]

    author author M. G. \ Gorman , author D. McGonegle , author R. F. \ Smith , author S. Singh , author T. Jenkins , author R. S. \ McWilliams , et al. ,\ 10.1063/5.0201702 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 135 ,\ pages 165902 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    Mason , author S

    author author P. Mason , author S. Banerjee , author J. Smith , author T. Butcher , author J. Phillips , author H. Höppner , author D. Möller , author K. Ertel , author M. De Vido , author I. Hollingham , \ and\ author et al. ,\ 10.1017/hpl.2018.56 journal journal High Power L...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Maltezopoulos , author F

    author author T. Maltezopoulos , author F. Dietrich , author W. Freund , author A. Kock , author J. Laksman , author J. Liu , author M. Planas , author A. Sorokin , author K. Tiedtke , \ and\ author J. GrK\" u nert ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Synchrotron Radiation \ vo...

    2019

  38. [46]

    Prescher \ and\ author V

    author author C. Prescher \ and\ author V. B. \ Prakapenka ,\ 10.1080/08957959.2015.1059835 journal journal High Pressure Research \ volume 35 ,\ pages 223 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  39. [47]

    author author J. H. \ Hubbell , author W. J. \ Veigele , author E. A. \ Briggs , author R. T. \ Brown , author D. T. \ Cromer , \ and\ author R. J. \ Howerton ,\ 10.1063/1.555523 journal journal Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data \ volume 4 ,\ pages 471 ( year 197...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Berger , author J

    author author M. Berger , author J. Hubbell , author S. Seltzer , author J. Coursey , \ and\ author D. Zucker ,\ http://physics.nist.gov/xcom title Xcom: Photon cross section database (version 1.2) , \ ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  41. [49]

    Dinnebier \ and\ author P

    author author R. Dinnebier \ and\ author P. Scardi ,\ 10.1107/S1600576723002121 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 56 ,\ pages 834 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  42. [50]

    Borie ,\ 10.1107/S0365110X61001820 journal journal Acta Crystallographica \ volume 14 ,\ pages 566 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    author author B. Borie ,\ 10.1107/S0365110X61001820 journal journal Acta Crystallographica \ volume 14 ,\ pages 566 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    1961 doi

  43. [51]

    author author N. J. \ Hartley , author J. Grenzer , author L. Huang , author Y. Inubushi , author N. Kamimura , author K. Katagiri , author R. Kodama , author A. Kon , author W. Lu , author M. Makita , author T. Matsuoka , author S. Nakajima , author N. Ozaki , author T. Pikuz...

    doi

  44. [52]

    author author C. H. \ Wu , author C. R. \ Houska , \ and\ author S. Rao ,\ 10.1063/1.355961 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 75 ,\ pages 4465 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  45. [53]

    author author D. R. \ Chipman \ and\ author A. Paskin ,\ 10.1063/1.1735104 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 30 ,\ pages 1998 ( year 1959 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  46. [54]

    author author C. Y. \ Ho , author R. W. \ Powell , \ and\ author P. E. \ Liley ,\ http://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:06195631 journal journal Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, Supplement \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1974 ) NoStop

    1974

  47. [55]

    author author J. M. \ Walsh , author M. H. \ Rice , author R. G. \ McQueen , \ and\ author F. L. \ Yarger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.108.196 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 108 ,\ pages 196 ( year 1957 ) NoStop

    1957 doi

  48. [56]

    Eggert ,\ @noop howpublished Private communication ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    author author J. Eggert ,\ @noop howpublished Private communication ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  49. [57]

    author author F. H. \ Herbstein \ and\ author B. L. \ Averbach ,\ 10.1107/S0365110X55002521 journal journal Acta Crystallographica \ volume 8 ,\ pages 843 ( year 1955 ) NoStop

    1955 doi

  50. [58]

    author author C. B. \ Walker \ and\ author D. R. \ Chipman ,\ 10.1107/S0567739472001470 journal journal Acta Crystallographica Section A \ volume 28 ,\ pages 572 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  51. [59]

    Wehinger \ and\ author A

    author author B. Wehinger \ and\ author A. Mirone ,\ @noop title ab2tds , \ howpublished http://ftp.esrf.fr/scisoft/AB2TDS/ ( year 2013 ),\ note accessed: 091224 NoStop

    2013

  52. [60]

    Xu \ and\ author T

    author author R. Xu \ and\ author T. C. \ Chiang ,\ doi:10.1524/zkri.2005.220.12.1009 journal journal Zeitschrift fÃŒr Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials \ volume 220 ,\ pages 1009 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  53. [61]

    author author A. A. \ Maradudin \ and\ author P. A. \ Flinn ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.129.2529 journal journal Phys. Rev. \ volume 129 ,\ pages 2529 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963 doi

  54. [62]

    Waller \ and\ author D

    author author I. Waller \ and\ author D. R. \ Hartree ,\ http://www.jstor.org/stable/95136 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character \ volume 124 ,\ pages 119 ( year 1929 ) NoStop

    1929

  55. [63]

    Heitler ,\ @noop title The Quantum Theory of Radiation Third Edition \ ( publisher Oxford Unversity Press ,\ year 1954 ) NoStop

    author author W. Heitler ,\ @noop title The Quantum Theory of Radiation Third Edition \ ( publisher Oxford Unversity Press ,\ year 1954 ) NoStop

    1954

  56. [64]

    Zastrau , author K

    author author U. Zastrau , author K. Appel , author C. Baehtz , author O. Batchelor , author M. Brambrink , author E. Cerantola , author V. Cowan , author Dietrich , author S. Cafiso , \ and\ author J. Feldmann ,\ 10.1107/S1600577521007335 journal journal Journal of Synchrotro...

    doi

  57. [65]

    Maltezopoulos , author F

    author author T. Maltezopoulos , author F. Dietrich , author W. Freund , author U. F. \ Jastrow , author A. Koch , author J. L , author J. Liu , author M. Planas , author A. A. \ Sorokin , author K. Tiedtke , \ and\ author J. Grünert ,\ 10.1107/S1600577519003795 journal journa...

    doi

  58. [66]

    author author B. E. \ Warren ,\ @noop title X-Ray Diffraction \ ( publisher Dover Publications, Inc. ,\ address New York, NY ,\ year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  59. [67]

    James ,\ @noop title The Optical Principle of the Diffraction of X-Rays \ ( publisher London: Bell ,\ year 1948 ) NoStop

    author author R. James ,\ @noop title The Optical Principle of the Diffraction of X-Rays \ ( publisher London: Bell ,\ year 1948 ) NoStop

    1948

  60. [68]

    author author H. A. \ Bethe \ and\ author R. W. \ Jackiw ,\ @noop title Intermediate Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. Lecture Notes and Supplements in Physics. \ ( publisher Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park ,\ year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  61. [69]

    author author D. T. \ Cromer \ and\ author J. B. \ Mann ,\ 10.1107/S0567739468000550 journal journal Acta Crystallographica Section A \ volume 24 ,\ pages 321 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  62. [70]

    Thorkildsen ,\ 10.1107/S2053273323003996 journal journal Acta Crystallographica Section A \ volume 79 ,\ pages 318 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    author author G. Thorkildsen ,\ 10.1107/S2053273323003996 journal journal Acta Crystallographica Section A \ volume 79 ,\ pages 318 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    Dillamore \ and\ author W

    author author I. Dillamore \ and\ author W. Roberts ,\ 10.1016/0001-6160(64)90204-4 journal journal Acta Metallurgica \ volume 12 ,\ pages 281 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964 doi

  64. [72]

    author author J. J. \ Sidor \ and\ author L. A. \ Kestens ,\ 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.039 journal journal Scripta Materialia \ volume 68 ,\ pages 273 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  65. [73]

    author author L. A. I. \ Kestens \ and\ author H. Pirgazi ,\ 10.1080/02670836.2016.1231746 journal journal Materials Science and Technology \ volume 32 ,\ pages 1303 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  66. [74]

    Hielscher \ and\ author H

    author author R. Hielscher \ and\ author H. Schaeben ,\ 10.1107/S0021889808030112 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 41 ,\ pages 1024 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.