Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Resolving the mass transfer in the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read T CrB's decade-long brightening is a dwarf-nova-style disc outburst, not a change in the giant star.

desk verdict First Doppler tomography of a symbiotic system, with a precise orbit and a clean separation of emission sites, but the RLOF conclusion rests on a partially circular geometry assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02984 v1 pith:ILIL7M6B submitted 2025-01-06 astro-ph.SR

L. Planquart , A. Jorissen , H. Van Winckel This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords symbioticbinariesrecurrentnovaeTCoronaeBorealisaccretiondisksRochelobeoverflowDopplertomographydwarfnovaoutburstdiscinstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses a decade of high-resolution spectra of the symbiotic recurrent nova T CrB to resolve where and how matter flows during its 2015-2023 super-active phase. By mapping spectral lines into velocity space with Doppler tomography, it identifies the bright spot where the gas stream hits the disc, the stream overflowing the disc, the disc wind, the irradiated face of the giant, and an expanding bipolar nebula. The authors conclude that the giant fills its Roche lobe and transfers mass to a large, optically thick, viscously evolved disc, and that the super-active phase started as a dwarf-nova-like disc instability in the inner disc, later sustained by irradiation of the donor. If true, the same accretion machinery that drives cataclysmic variables works in long-period symbiotic binaries and has set the stage for T CrB's predicted imminent nova eruption.

What carries the argument

The central tool is Doppler tomography, which maps time-resolved emission lines into orbital-velocity space (Vx, Vy), where each component appears as a distinct feature. The interpretation is anchored by the restricted three-body ballistic stream from the L1 point, whose trajectory and impact point on the disc are fixed by the orbital parameters, and by the Keplerian velocity circles at the circularization radius r_circ and the tidal truncation radius r_t. Lines of different excitation are assigned to the bright spot (O I 8446, He I 6678), the disc wind (H-alpha, He I 5876), the boundary layer near the white dwarf (He II 4686, N III), the irradiated giant face and disc-overflow veil (absorption lines), and the expanding nebula ([O III], [Ne III]). The temporal lags between these sites then carry the causal argument: nebula first, then disc lines, then irradiated giant.

What would settle it

One concrete test: measure the system's inclination and masses independently (for example, from an astrometric orbit or from a different nova light-curve model) and recompute the Doppler maps; if the O I 8446 bright-spot emission no longer lies on the ballistic stream between r_circ and r_t, the Roche-lobe-overflow picture fails. Alternatively, check whether the [O III] double-peaked expansion continues to follow the v proportional to sqrt(t) acceleration until the predicted nova; if the nebula is not a blast wave from the inner disc, the timing argument for an inner-disc trigger weakens.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, from Doppler tomography of a hundred spectra spanning 2011-2023, that during the super-active phase the mass transfer in T CrB is dominated by Roche lobe overflow from the Roche-filling M giant onto an optically thick and fully viscously evolved accretion disc that extends to its tidal truncation radius. It resolves the bright spot at the stream impact on the disc outer edge, the stream-disc overflow veiling the inner disc, the accretion-disc wind, the irradiated side of the giant, and a bipolar nebula launched at the rise of the super-active phase. The temporal ordering of these features, together with the soft X-ray turn-on reported earlier, leads the authors to conclude that the super-active phase was triggered in the inner disc by a thermal-viscous instability analogous to dwarf-nova outbursts, with irradiation of the donor subsequently enhancing and sustaining the mass transfer. This is presented as the first Doppler-tomographic resolution of the accretion structure of a symbiotic star.

Load-bearing premise

All the Doppler-map placements are scaled by the adopted geometry - inclination 65 +/- 5 degrees and white dwarf mass 1.32 +/- 0.10 solar masses - together with the assumption that the M giant exactly fills its Roche lobe, so the ballistic stream trajectory and the disc radii (r_circ and r_t) apply; if these are wrong, the bright-spot location, the disc-overflow veiling, and the tidal-radius disc conclusion all shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • T CrB's 2015-2023 super-active phase is a dwarf-nova-like thermal-viscous outburst, scaled by a disc about a hundred times larger than in typical cataclysmic variables.
  • The accretion disc is at its maximal, tidally truncated size, so any further mass input is likely to be accreted onto the white dwarf rather than stored in the disc.
  • Irradiation of the M giant by the brightened disc raises the mass-transfer rate, creating a positive feedback loop that prolongs and amplifies the outburst.
  • The expanding nebula seen in [O III] was launched near the start of the super-active phase and accelerated for about five years, tracing a blast wave from the inner disc.
  • Doppler tomography of symbiotic stars can now be applied to other long-period interacting binaries to test whether the same accretion physics operates there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the disc was already at its tidal radius when the outburst began, the disc instability could only have started inside-out, so the 2015 brightening should have appeared first in high-excitation lines tracing the inner disc; the paper's temporal lags qualitatively support this and can be checked with time-resolved X-ray and ultraviolet monitoring.
  • Inference: The irradiation feedback loop implies a natural explanation for why the super-active phase ended abruptly in 2023: once the disc cooled below the hydrogen-ionization threshold, the mass-transfer boost faded, returning the system to quiescence before the nova eruption.
  • Inference: If the bipolar ejection traveled about 40 au along the line of sight during the super-active phase, then high-angular-resolution radio or optical observations near the predicted eruption should resolve a compact polar nebula at roughly 100 milliarcseconds, a testable prediction.
  • Inference: The same physical scaling from dwarf novae to symbiotic discs suggests that other symbiotic recurrent novae with giant donors and orbital periods of hundreds of days should show pre-eruption super-active phases with similar line-emission patterns; a Doppler-tomography survey of such systems would test this claim.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a decade of HERMES high-resolution spectra of the symbiotic recurrent nova T CrB (2011-2023), derives an updated spectroscopic orbit from radial velocities, performs Doppler tomography of selected emission lines, and interprets the phase-dependent line behavior in terms of distinct interaction sites: a bright spot at the stream impact on an accretion disk, stream-overflow veiling, an accretion-disk wind, an irradiation spot on the giant, and an expanding nebula or jet. The authors argue that the disk is fully viscously evolved and extends to its tidal-truncation radius, that mass transfer during the super-active phase is dominated by Roche lobe overflow, and that the 2015-2023 brightening was triggered in the inner disk by a dwarf-nova-like disc instability and sustained by irradiation-enhanced mass transfer.

Significance. If correct, this would establish T CrB as the first symbiotic system analyzed with Doppler tomography and would directly extend cataclysmic-variable accretion physics (RLOF, stream impact, disc instability) to a 227-day binary with a large disk and a massive white dwarf. The dataset is valuable: the orbit is measured to high precision (O-C scatter 0.5 km/s), the phase-resolved spectral inventory is extensive, the He ii semi-amplitude check provides an independent consistency test of the adopted masses and inclination, and the temporal development of the line intensities is documented in detail. The central geometric interpretation, however, relies on an assumed Roche-filling donor and on an inclination derived from ellipsoidal modeling, so the RLOF and disk-radius conclusions need a sensitivity analysis before they can be taken as demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sect. 2.2, Table 2, Sect. 3.1, Fig. 3] The sentence "As the system is semi-detached, the donor radius is equal to its Roche lobe" introduces, without independent support, the assumption on which the entire geometric interpretation rests. This assumption fixes the L1 ballistic-stream trajectory, b1, r_circ, and rt used to identify the Doppler arc as the bright spot and to conclude that the disk reaches its tidal-truncation radius. The adopted inclination i=65±5 deg comes from ellipsoidal light-curve modeling, whose amplitude and shape depend on the donor filling factor, so the model and the RLOF conclusion are not fully independent. The He ii K2 check in Sect. 3.3 tests the adopted masses and inclination but not the filling factor. Please provide a sensitivity analysis over donor filling factor (e.g., f=0.9-1.0) and over i=60-70 deg, demonstrating that the spot location and the derived disk radius are robust; alternatively, supply an independent constraint on the giant radius (e.g., from SED fitting or interferometry). Without this, the statement in Sect. 6 that mass transfer is dominated by RLOF to a disk extending to rt is stronger than the evidence presented.
  2. [Sect. 3.5, Fig. 7, Appendix A] The stream-overflow veiling interpretation is invoked with the condition i≥65 deg, while the adopted inclination is 65±5 deg; at i=60 deg the veiling model would not apply, and the predicted 3-6 times K2 velocity shift depends on an unconstrained deflection geometry. Since this veiling is used to explain both the He i absorption excess and the suppressed ellipsoidal maximum at φ=0.6-0.9 during the SAP, the argument is not robust to the inclination uncertainty. Please quantify the allowed range of i and deflection angles for which the observed phase coverage and velocity amplitude are reproduced.
  3. [Sect. 3.1, Fig. 3, Appendix C] The Doppler tomograms are presented without error estimates or artifact checks, yet the location of the arc relative to the r_circ and rt circles is the main evidence for the disk outer radius. Please provide at least a bootstrap or Monte Carlo estimate of the arc centroid, or tests with the filtered back-projection parameters and with alternative giant-subtraction templates, to show that the feature is not a reconstruction artifact and that its position is significantly different from both circles.
  4. [Sect. 4, Fig. 9, Table 4] The temporal ordering used to argue for an inside-out trigger and irradiation feedback rests on peak times tp reported without uncertainties; the text itself says "If significant" before using these delays. Please give uncertainties on tp and run a simple lag-correlation or cross-correlation between the B-band light curve and the individual line series, so the claimed sequence (nebula first, then disk edge, then wind, then irradiation) is quantitatively established rather than asserted.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2 vs. Sect. 2.2] The text quotes q=0.74±0.15 but Table 2 gives q=0.74±0.18; please harmonize these values.
  2. [Sect. 3.2, Fig. 4, Sects. 4-6] The paper explicitly leaves the [O iii] geometry ambiguous between an equatorial ring and a bipolar jet, but the later sections refer to a bipolar jet without repeating the caveat; please carry the ambiguity through the conclusions or add a separating test (e.g., spatially resolved observations or polarization).
  3. [Sect. 5.2] The statement that the SAP duration is qualitatively compatible with a DIM timescale scaled by a factor of about 1000 is only an order-of-magnitude argument; please cite the relevant quantitative estimates from Bollimpalli et al. (2018) or state more explicitly that this is not a test of the DIM.
  4. [Sect. 2.1] The text reports an O-C scatter of 0.5 km/s and an instrumental error of 0.07 km/s; please report the number of spectra used and the reduced chi-square of the Keplerian fit so readers can judge whether the jitter interpretation is necessary.
  5. [Abstract and Sect. 3.2] The abstract mentions an expanding bipolar nebula, while Sect. 3.2 notes the same profile is also compatible with an equatorial ring; the wording should be consistent between these places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RLOF/stream model is an adopted premise, and the Doppler arc and He II velocity checks are independent, falsifiable comparisons.

full rationale

The paper's central inference is not circular. Orbital elements are fitted to the giant's radial-velocity curve, while the inclination and white-dwarf mass are adopted from independent published analyses (Stanishev et al. 2004; Shara et al. 2018). The ballistic stream trajectory and the Keplerian radii r_circ and r_t are then computed as a model, and the observed Doppler arc is compared with that model. This is a genuine model-data comparison: the arc could have fallen elsewhere, and its location between the predicted radii is not a parameter fitted from the same data. The He II semi-amplitude check (16 +/- 2 km/s versus q*K1 = 18 +/- 4 km/s) is also an independent consistency test using a different emission line, not a tuned prediction. The main caveat is that the Roche-lobe-overflow picture is introduced as a premise ('As the system is semi-detached...'), so the conclusion that the giant is Roche-filling inherits that assumption; however, this is an untested premise or robustness concern rather than a circular derivation. No equation is defined in terms of its target, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the required standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation rests on the standard CV toolkit applied to T CrB: a Roche-filling donor, ballistic stream, Keplerian disk, and stationary Doppler tomography. The adopted i and M_WD from the literature set the absolute scale and are not independently measured here. No new physical entity is introduced. The most fragile assumptions are the exact Roche-filling geometry and the stationarity of line emission, both acknowledged in the paper through the He ii flickering discussion.

free parameters (3)
  • Orbital inclination i = 65 +/- 5 deg (adopted from Stanishev et al. 2004)
    Sets the system scale via q, K2, disc radii, and de-projected velocities; adopted, not measured in this paper.
  • White dwarf mass M_WD = 1.32 +/- 0.10 M_sun (adopted from Shara et al. 2018)
    Together with the mass function it fixes q = 0.74 and the predicted He ii semi-amplitude; scales the Doppler tomograms.
  • Giant atmosphere parameters for spectral subtraction = Teff=3400 K, log g=0.5, [Fe/H]=0.35, [O/H]=0.1 (from Galan et al. 2023)
    Used to remove the giant spectrum before Doppler mapping; errors would change the residual line profiles.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The donor giant fills its Roche lobe, making T CrB semi-detached and the L1 ballistic stream model applicable.
    Sect. 2.2 states 'As the system is semi-detached, the donor radius is equal to its Roche lobe'; this underpins the predicted stream path and bright-spot location.
  • domain assumption The line-emitting gas distribution is stationary in the binary frame over the orbital cycles used for Doppler tomography.
    Doppler tomography with filtered back-projection requires this; the authors note He ii flickering and renormalize each spectrum to unit peak, which only partially addresses non-stationarity (Sect. 3.3).
  • domain assumption The [O iii] double-peaked profile is caused by a bipolar jet rather than an equatorial ring.
    Sect. 3.2: both geometries fit the line shape; the polar interpretation is favored using analogies with R Aqr and EG And. The later jet-acceleration narrative depends on this choice.
  • domain assumption LTE model atmospheres (MARCS/Turbospectrum) adequately represent the giant's photosphere for subtraction.
    Sect. 3.4 uses MARCS/Turbospectrum synthetic spectra at 3400 K to subtract the giant; residual errors would propagate into all line profiles.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resolving the mass transfer in the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ILIL7M6B

@misc{pith2026250102984,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resolving the mass transfer in the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ILIL7M6B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02984}
}
read the original abstract

T Coronae Borealis (T CrB) is a symbiotic recurrent nova with an 80-year recurrence interval whose next eruption is imminent. We aim to resolve the accretion mechanism of the binary system governing the mass transfer during its super-active phase. Using phase-resolved high-resolution spectroscopy, we analyze the zoo of spectral-line profiles arising from the symbiotic activity. We perform Doppler tomography of selected emission lines to resolve the system's gaseous components and their different velocity regimes. We find evidence of enhanced accretion through Roche lobe overflow during the super-active phase, as traced by the oxygen, helium, and hydrogen lines. The accretion disc is found to be fully viscously evolved and extends up to its maximal radius. By mapping the kinematics of lines probing different excitation energies, we can identify distinct interaction sites. These include the bright spot at the stream impact on the accretion disc outer radius, the irradiation at the red-giant facing side, the stream-disc overflow, the accretion disk wind, and an expanding bipolar nebula. The bipolar jet emerged at the rise of the super-active phase and underwent an acceleration phase of about five years. The temporal evolution of the lines supports the scenario where the departure from quiescence started in the disc, likely triggered by a disc instability similar to what occurs in dwarf novae outburst, leading to an increased mass accretion and causing important irradiation of the giant that has further enhanced the mass-transfer rate during the super-active phase. Conclusions. Symbiotic recurrent novae, such as T CrB, are governed by similar mass-transfer mechanisms as found in cataclysmic variables despite their different orbital properties (longer orbital periods imposing larger accretion discs) and evolutionary pathways.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02984 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radial velocities of T CrB. The error bars are plotted as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Computation of the Doppler map for the O [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Combined Doppler tomograms. The Roche lobe (black solid line), the center of mass (black plus), the ballistic flow velocity (dashed line), the Keplerian velocities of the AD at rcirc (dotted line) and rt (dash-dotted line) are marked. Left: Hydrogen-based transition. Right: Helium-based transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral profiles of the [O iii] line at 5007 Å at differ￾ent orbital phases of the same cycle. The profiles are obtained after subtracting the giant contribution. The y-axis is the pseudo￾continuum-normalized flux obtained as the median value of the spectral window. O…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: He ii orbital variation. Left: observation after subtraction of the giant contribution and second normalization. Right: re￾constructed dynamic spectrum. The motion of the white dwarf is shown with a white dashed line. during the SAP and can be attributed to a hot (T > …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: O i triplet lines. Left: dynamic spectrum. Middle: T CrB spectra at phases 0.49 (black solid line) and 0.77 (dashed line), and a synthetic spectrum at 3400 K (red line). The bottom panel displays the difference spectrum between phases 0.49 and 0.77 (black line) and a s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Surface mapping of the intensity of the absorption lines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic view of the system for i = 65◦ and q = 0.75 at ϕ = 0.25. The numbers displayed (1 → 6) refer to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ). In addition to its intensity variation, the [O iii] line un￾derwent a profile variation during the first half of the SAP, illus￾trated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Temporal evolution of the [O iii] profile. The SAP start is set at t = 0. The emission profiles are obtained after remov￾ing the giant contribution and interpolating between the observa￾tions. The evolution of the peak positions is represented by the dashed white line…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Schematic Σ − Teff curve, showing the instability loop. 5.3. The suggested scenario The AD properties inferred from the spectroscopic monitoring study agree with a thermally-unstable disc, as required for DIM. The delayed irradiation of the donor can be attributed to …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When will T Coronae Borealis next erupt as a nova? Constraints from recurrence, orbital phase, and accretion-state evolution

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    T CrB's next eruption is not uniquely predictable; conditional scenarios point to a possible 2026 December eruption if the current decline mimics 1946, or a lower limit near 2029 May if the recent high state left an a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M., Sip˝ocz, B

    Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147

    2021

  3. [3]

    & Mikolajewska, J

    Belczynski, K. & Mikolajewska, J. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 77

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    A., Hameury, J

    Bollimpalli, D. A., Hameury, J. M., & Lasota, J. P. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 5422

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Corradi, R. L. M., Munari, U., Livio, M., et al. 2001, ApJ, 560, 912

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    2009, A&A, 498, 627

    Famaey, B., Pourbaix, D., Frankowski, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 627

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    C., Joyce, R

    Fekel, F. C., Joyce, R. R., Hinkle, K. H., & Skrutskie, M. F. 2000, AJ, 119, 1375

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics, 3rd edn. (Cambridge University Press) Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1 Gałan, C., Mikołajewska, J., Hinkle, K. H., & Joyce, R. R. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 918

    work page 2002

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    & Kato, M

    Hachisu, I. & Kato, M. 1999, ApJ, 517, L47

    1999

  2. [10]

    & Kato, M

    Hachisu, I. & Kato, M. 2001, ApJ, 558, 323

    2001

  3. [11]

    Hameury, J. M. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1004

    2020

  4. [12]

    2000, A&A, 353, 244 Harvey, É

    Hameury, J.-M., Lasota, J.-P., & Warner, B. 2000, A&A, 353, 244 Harvey, É. J., Aydi, E., Izzo, L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4750

    2000

  5. [13]

    1996, ApJ, 471, 949

    Hellier, C. 1996, ApJ, 471, 949

    1996

  6. [14]

    Hoare, M. G. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 153

    1994

  7. [15]

    K., Robertson, J

    Honeycutt, R. K., Robertson, J. W., & Turner, G. W. 1998, AJ, 115, 2527 Iłkiewicz, K., Mikołajewska, J., Stoyanov, K., Manousakis, A., & Miszalski, B. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 2695 Iłkiewicz, K., Mikołajewska, J., & Stoyanov, K. A. 2023, ApJ, 953, L7

    1998

  8. [16]

    2016, A&A, 586, A158

    Jorissen, A., Van Eck, S., Van Winckel, H., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A158

    2016

  9. [17]

    K., & Bianchini, A

    Kafka, S., Tappert, C., Honeycutt, R. K., & Bianchini, A. 2003, AJ, 126, 1472

    2003

  10. [18]

    Kraft, R. P. 1958, ApJ, 127, 625

    1958

  11. [19]

    Kunze, S., Speith, R., & Hessman, F. V . 2001, MNRAS, 322, 499

    2001

  12. [20]

    2001, New A Rev., 45, 449

    Lasota, J.-P. 2001, New A Rev., 45, 449

    2001

  13. [21]

    2000, ApJ, 541, L25

    Lee, H.-W. 2000, ApJ, 541, L25

    2000

  14. [22]

    Liimets, T., Corradi, R. L. M., Jones, D., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A118

    2018

  15. [23]

    D., Chomiuk, L., Sokoloski, J

    Linford, J. D., Chomiuk, L., Sokoloski, J. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 8

    2019

  16. [24]

    2019, A&A, 622, A35

    Liu, D., Wang, B., Ge, H., Chen, X., & Han, Z. 2019, A&A, 622, A35

    2019

  17. [25]

    Luna, G. J. M., Mukai, K., Sokoloski, J. L., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A61

    2018

  18. [26]

    Luna, G. J. M., Nelson, T., Mukai, K., & Sokoloski, J. L. 2019, ApJ, 880, 94

    2019

  19. [27]

    Luna, G. J. M., Sokoloski, J. L., Mukai, K., & M. Kuin, N. P. 2020, ApJ, 902, L14

    2020

  20. [28]

    Marsh, T. R. & Horne, K. 1988, MNRAS, 235, 269

    1988

  21. [29]

    2023, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 251

    Munari, U. 2023, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 7, 251

    2023

  22. [30]

    2016, New A, 47, 7 Mürset, U

    Munari, U., Dallaporta, S., & Cherini, G. 2016, New A, 47, 7 Mürset, U. & Schmid, H. M. 1999, A&AS, 137, 473

    2016

  23. [31]

    1989, PASJ, 41, 1005 Paczy´nski, B

    Osaki, Y . 1989, PASJ, 41, 1005 Paczy´nski, B. 1971, ARA&A, 9, 183

    1989

  24. [32]

    2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    Plez, B. 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004

    2012

  25. [33]

    2011, A&A, 526, A69

    Raskin, G., van Winckel, H., Hensberge, H., et al. 2011, A&A, 526, A69

    2011

  26. [34]

    Sanford, R. F. 1949, ApJ, 109, 81

    1949

  27. [35]

    1997, A&A, 319, 166

    Schwank, M., Schmutz, W., & Nussbaumer, H. 1997, A&A, 319, 166

    1997

  28. [36]

    L., Cassatella, A., & Gilmozzi, R

    Selvelli, P. L., Cassatella, A., & Gilmozzi, R. 1992, ApJ, 393, 289

    1992

  29. [37]

    Y ., et al

    Shagatova, N., Skopal, A., Shugarov, S. Y ., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A116

    2021

  30. [38]

    M., Prialnik, D., Hillman, Y ., & Kovetz, A

    Shara, M. M., Prialnik, D., Hillman, Y ., & Kovetz, A. 2018, ApJ, 860, 110

    2018

  31. [39]

    2006, A&A, 457, 1003

    Skopal, A. 2006, A&A, 457, 1003

    2006

  32. [40]

    2004, A&A, 415, 609

    Stanishev, V ., Zamanov, R., Tomov, N., & Marziani, P. 2004, A&A, 415, 609

    2004

  33. [41]

    2018, PASJ, 70, 8 Toalá, J

    Takeda, Y ., Jeong, G., & Han, I. 2018, PASJ, 70, 8 Toalá, J. A., González-Martín, O., Sacchi, A., & Vasquez-Torres, D. A. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 1421

    2018

  34. [42]

    1996, MNRAS, 278, 542

    Tomov, T., Kolev, D., Munari, U., & Antov, A. 1996, MNRAS, 278, 542

    1996

  35. [43]

    1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, V ol

    Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic variable stars, V ol. 28; Cambridge astrophysics series (Cambridge University Press)

    1995

  36. [44]

    & Peters, W

    Warner, B. & Peters, W. L. 1972, MNRAS, 160, 15

    1972

  37. [45]

    1988, MNRAS, 232, 35

    Whitehurst, R. 1988, MNRAS, 232, 35

    1988

  38. [46]

    E., Pavlenko, Y

    Woodward, C. E., Pavlenko, Y . V ., Evans, A., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 231

    2020

  39. [47]

    Y ., et al

    Zamanov, R., Boeva, S., Latev, G. Y ., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, L18 Article number, page 11 of 15 A&A proofs: manuscript no. main Appendix A: Photometry Figure A.1 represents the B-band photometry from AA VSO phase-folded and phase-averaged using a rolling mean of win- dow ∆ϕ = ...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.