Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 108 references

No single date can be adopted for T CrB's next eruption: the data support two conditional windows, around 2026 December if the current decline mirrors the pre-1946 dip, and no earlier than 2029 May if the recent bright state left an accreti

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:43 UTC pith:Y42OTRRN

load-bearing objection Useful, honest synthesis on T CrB timing, but the 2029 May lower limit rests on an adopted brightness ratio with no error bar and contains an internal numeric slip. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15245 v1 pith:Y42OTRRN submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.HE

When will T Coronae Borealis next erupt as a nova? Constraints from recurrence, orbital phase, and accretion-state evolution

Songpeng Pei , Xiaowan Zhang , Renzhi Su , Ziwei Ou , Yongzhi Cai , Qiang Li , Yu Liu , Xiaoqin Ren
show 1 more author
Taozhi Yang
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords recurrent novaT Coronae Borealisnova eruption timingaccretion deficitorbital phasesymbiotic binarywhite dwarf ignitioneruption prediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

T Coronae Borealis — a binary in which a white dwarf pulls gas from a red giant and erupts every ~80 years — is the closest known recurrent nova, and this paper asks when it will blow again. It argues that no single observable can fix the date: recurrence, orbital phase, and accretion-state evolution each constrain the timing but cannot be combined into one point prediction. Instead, the data support two conditional monitoring windows: an eruption around 2026 December is plausible if the renewed 2026 decline is the true pre-1946 analogue, while the shorter, fainter 2014–2023 high state implies an accretion deficit that sets an earliest lower limit near 2029 May if post-2024 brightness stays below that high state. The historical eruption phases form two loose pairs (near orbital phase 0.44 and 0.62) that serve as scheduling windows, and the 1946 pre-eruption dip likely required both accretion restructuring and source-dependent obscuration. The paper frames these as falsifiable scenarios, so the actual eruption date will test which assumption was right.

Core claim

T CrB's next eruption cannot be fixed by any single clock. Conditioned on no eruption by 2026 July 11, recurrence gives 30.2% probability for the rest of 2026 and 56.9% for the next year. Historical eruption phases form two loose pairs (near 0.44 and 0.62), useful only as monitoring windows. Because the 2014–2023 high state was shorter and fainter than the pre-1946 one, optical luminosity as a proxy for accretion implies a missing high-state-equivalent exposure of 1800 days; waiting time is (28/r)×1800 days — 4.93 yr (high state) or 9.52 yr (intermediate), yielding a conditional earliest lower limit near 2029 May. The 1946 dip probably required both accretion restructuring and obscuration, s

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the accretion-deficit mass budget: comparing the pre-1946 high state (duration 3665 d, 40% brighter) with the 2014–2023 high state (3331 d) under the assumption that optical luminosity L of the hot component is proportional to accretion rate (L = 0.5 G M_WD Mdot/R_WD cos i), the missing high-state-equivalent exposure is 1800 d, so the remaining wait is Δt_wait = (28/r)×1800 d, with r the future accretion rate relative to quiescence. Secondary machinery: a survival-conditioned Gaussian recurrence model (conditional probabilities and hazard) and orbital-phase folding on a fixed spectroscopic ephemeris to define monitoring windows.

Load-bearing premise

The 2029 May lower-limit branch rests on the assumption that optical luminosity of the hot component is proportional to the mass accretion rate onto the white dwarf (fixed WD mass, radius, inclination); if brightness does not track delivered mass — due to EUV/X-ray losses, boundary-layer optical-depth changes, or disk geometry — that branch collapses.

What would settle it

If T CrB erupts before, say, 2027, the accretion-deficit lower-limit branch is falsified (or post-2024 accretion was much higher than optically inferred). Alternatively, simultaneous EUV/X-ray observations during the current 2026 decline that show accretion luminosity not declining along with optical light would falsify the L ∝ Mdot tracer assumption underlying the 2029 May estimate.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Observers should schedule dense monitoring in the phase-pair windows after 2026 July 11 (first: 2026 August 5–8; next complete pair-spanning interval: 2027 February 8–March 23), treating them as scheduling aids, not predictions.
  • If the current 2026 decline deepens and an eruption follows within about six months, the dip-analogue interpretation is supported and the estimated accretion deficit was likely overestimated or post-2024 accretion was higher than optically inferred.
  • If no eruption occurs and post-2024 brightness stays below the 2014–2023 high state, the earliest lower limit is around 2029 May; an eruption near or after that date under continued sub-high-state brightness would support the accretion-deficit interpretation.
  • A single future eruption will update the recurrence distribution and hazard and add one point to the phase sample, but one event cannot by itself establish phase locking.
  • The 2023–2024 fade should not be used as a strict pre-eruption clock; the 1946 dip's depth in V likely involved both accretion restructuring and obscuration, so any dip-based delay estimate carries substantial systematic uncertainty.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If optical brightness is a poor tracer of mass delivered to the white dwarf — e.g., if a substantial fraction of accretion luminosity emerges in the EUV/X-ray or the boundary layer changes optical depth — the 2029 May lower limit could shift earlier or later by years; simultaneous UV/X-ray monitoring of the current decline would test this directly.
  • The two phase pairs (0.44 and 0.62) raise the possibility of alternate-cycle phase alternation, but with only four historical events the sample is too small to distinguish alternation from noise; a future eruption at one phase would not settle it but would add a datapoint.
  • The paper's conditional framing implies that 'no eruption by 2026' is itself informative: it increases the hazard from 0.68 to 0.83 per year, so the probability of eruption in the following year grows if the system stays quiet — this could be used to update monitoring priorities in real time.
  • The accretion-deficit argument suggests that in symbiotic recurrent novae, ignition mass is mostly accumulated during high-accretion states; if true, similar shortfall logic could be applied to other recurrent novae with well-monitored previous cycles, turning light-curve archives into ignition-mass estimators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper combines three observational constraints — historical recurrence intervals, orbital-phase folding, and recent optical accretion-state evolution — to argue that T CrB's next eruption cannot be uniquely predicted and that the data instead support several conditional monitoring scenarios. The authors compute small-sample survival probabilities conditioned on no eruption by 2026 July 11 (30.2% through 2026 and 56.9% over the following year), identify two loose empirical phase pairs (φ ≈ 0.44 and 0.62) used only as observing windows, argue that the 1946 pre-eruption dip likely required both accretion restructuring and non-standard obscuration, and propose that if the post-2024 brightness remains below the 2014–2023 high state, an accretion-deficit estimate gives an earliest lower limit near 2029 May. The paper is carefully hedged and frames the scenarios as falsifiable diagnostics rather than competing point predictions.

Significance. If the main message survives, the paper is a useful contribution to the monitoring strategy for T CrB: it explicitly demonstrates that a unique date cannot be inferred from current data and provides a structured, testable framework. The strongest positive features are the empirical, small-sample treatment of recurrence with leave-one-out sensitivity ranges; the explicit warning that orbital-phase windows are scheduling markers, not physically required dates; the honest discussion of the 1946 dip as an imperfect analogue; and the emphasis that the eventual eruption date will discriminate among assumptions. The paper does not overclaim a precise eruption epoch, which is a genuine strength. However, the quantitative 2029 May lower-limit branch rests on adopted external ratios and a derived uncertainty that is not fully supported, and one passage contains an internal numerical inconsistency that must be fixed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.5, Eqs. (16)–(20) and final paragraph] The 2029 May lower-limit branch depends entirely on the adopted ratio f_b = 1.4 from Munari et al. (2025), with no propagated uncertainty. From Eq. (17), Δt_h,eq = 1.4×3665 − 3331 = 1800 d; if f_b = 1.0 the deficit collapses to 334 d, and if f_b = 1.2 it becomes 1067 d. The text acknowledges that optical luminosity is only a first-order tracer of the accretion rate and that EUV/X-ray losses and boundary-layer effects matter, but the quantitative conclusion in the last paragraph ('5.02±2.08 yr', 'around 2029 May') is still couched as a conditional epoch. Since this is one of the two main predictive branches of the paper, the authors should either provide a justified uncertainty budget for f_b and for the L ∝ Mdot assumption, or explicitly downgrade the 2029 May branch to a purely illustrative order-of-magnitude scenario with a sensitivity table. As written, the branch is load-bearing and
  2. [§3.5, paragraph after Eq. (23)] There is a concrete internal inconsistency in the numerical presentation. The text states that a representative 1.8% ignition-mass correction gives approximately 5.02 yr, 9.69 yr, and 57028 d = 140.5 yr, but then says 'The first value, 5.58 yr, is the relevant lower-limit timescale.' This contradicts the preceding value of 5.02 yr. Moreover, the final quoted '5.02±2.08 yr' is introduced without any derivation of the ±2.08 yr uncertainty; it is not clear whether this comes from f_b, r_h, the duration measurements, or the WD-mass correction. This must be cleaned up and the uncertainty properly derived or removed. Since the 2029 May epoch is the paper's main accretion-deficit conclusion, this inconsistency makes that branch internally unreliable.
  3. [§3.5, Eq. (20) and Table 2] The conversion Δt_wait = (28/r) Δt_h,eq assumes that the high-state accretion rate is 28× quiescence and that the future rate r Mdot_q is constant. The 'earliest-time lower limit' interpretation is only valid if r ≤ 28, i.e., if the post-2024 mean accretion rate does not exceed the 2014–2023 high-state value. The paper does state this condition, but the logical status should be clarified: the 4.93 yr value is not a lower limit on the eruption time; it is a lower limit conditional on a particular assumption about the future accretion rate. If r could exceed 28, the waiting time could be shorter, and the 'around 2029 May' phrasing could be misread as a more robust bound than the assumptions support.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] The Gaussian survival probabilities are based on only three effective intervals. The leave-one-out ranges are helpful and should be kept, but it should be stated more explicitly that the Gaussian is a descriptive tool, not a physically motivated recurrence model for this system.
  2. [§3.2 and Table 1] The ephemeris is fixed to Fekel et al. (2000). Long-term period drift and the uncertain dates of AD 1217 and 1787 could shift the phase windows by more than the pair widths. The text acknowledges this, but it would be useful to quantify how much the windows could shift under plausible period evolution.
  3. [§3.3] The partial-covering model in Eqs. (10)–(11) is presented as one possible realization. Its parameter space is large, and the text is appropriately cautious. A reference to any existing hydrodynamical or radiative-transfer treatment of asymmetric obscuration in symbiotic novae would strengthen this section.
  4. [Throughout] Minor numerical typos: '5.58 yr' should be '5.02 yr' (see major comment), and the origin of '±2.08 yr' should be stated. Also, in the paragraph beginning 'If the post-2024 accretion proceeds...', the 1800 d is described as '4.93 yr', which is correct, but the subsequent '5.02±2.08 yr' should be consistently tied to the same starting point (2024 May).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the 2029 branch is arithmetic from cited empirical ratios; self-citations are auxiliary, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Eq. (1) is a survival-conditioned Gaussian using three historical intervals from Schneider (2024), not the target date. Eqs. (3)-(7) are fixed-ephemeris phase folding; the paper explicitly labels these 'monitoring windows' and disclaims phase-locking as a prediction. The accretion-deficit branch is an algebraic identity given adopted inputs: D1946/Dcur (stated as measured from AAVSO light curves, via Pei et al. 2026a), f_b=1.4 and the 28x rate ratio (Munari et al. 2025), and the standard L ∝ Mdot scaling (Zamanov et al. 2023). Eq. (17) defines the deficit; Eq. (20) rescales it; the '2029 May' date is 2024 May plus that rescaled deficit. No input is defined in terms of the predicted eruption epoch, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (Pei et al. 2026a,b) supply data-reduction details and a caution about orbital-phase locking; they do not smuggle in the conclusion or forbid alternatives. The paper repeatedly labels its outputs 'empirical indicators' and 'conditional diagnostic scenarios,' so the central claim is explicitly not a forced point prediction. There is an internal numerical inconsistency (the text gives 5.02 yr, then 'The first value, 5.58 yr,' then '5.02±2.08 yr' with no derivation of the uncertainty), and the result is highly sensitive to the adopted f_b=1.4; these are correctness/reliability concerns, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a handful of adopted parameters—mostly external ratios and sample statistics—rather than new physics. The most critical are the 28× and 1.4× factors from Munari et al. (2025) and the luminosity-tracer assumption. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • mean recurrence interval mu = 79.86 yr
    Sample mean of three historical intervals; used in Gaussian for conditional probabilities (§3.1).
  • recurrence standard deviation sigma = 1.53 yr
    Sample standard deviation of the three intervals; defines the Gaussian width (§3.1).
  • high-state luminosity ratio f_b = 1.4
    Adopted from Munari et al. (2025); pre-1946 high state 40% brighter; enters Δt_h,eq (§3.5).
  • high-state accretion rate multiplier r_h = 28
    Adopted from Munari et al. (2025); accretion rate 28× quiescent during SAP; used in Δt_wait (§3.5).
  • WD-mass ignition-mass correction = 1.8%
    Representative 1.8% correction from thin-shell scaling; applied to produce 5.02 yr lower limit (§3.5).
  • systematic uncertainty of lower limit = ±2.08 yr
    Hand-assigned systematic range spanning 2027–2031; no derivation given (§3.5).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Optical luminosity of hot component is proportional to accretion rate (L ∝ Mdot_a) with fixed WD mass, radius, and inclination (Eq. 16).
    Used to convert light-curve brightness into mass delivered; bolometric correction and EUV contributions ignored (§3.5).
  • domain assumption High-state accretion rate is 28 times quiescent and the pre-1946 high state was 40% more luminous (Munari et al. 2025).
    External adopted ratios; central to Δt_h,eq and Δt_wait (§3.5).
  • domain assumption Gaussian recurrence model is appropriate for the three historical intervals.
    Descriptive model; authors label as empirical indicator (§3.1).
  • domain assumption Adopted historical eruption epochs and the Fekel et al. (2000) ephemeris are correct.
    Folding phases and recurrence intervals depend on these (§3.1, §3.2).
  • standard math Thin-shell hydrostatic scaling for nova ignition mass (Eq. 22-23) is applicable.
    Used to estimate ignition-mass correction; standard scaling in nova literature.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10925 in / 10097 out tokens · 75727 ms · 2026-08-01T23:43:36.241307+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

T Coronae Borealis (T CrB) is the nearest symbiotic recurrent nova and is now intensively monitored for its next eruption. We combine three constraints on the eruption time: historical recurrence, orbital phase, and recent accretion-state evolution. Conditioning on no eruption by 2026 July 11, the three effective historical intervals give illustrative survival-conditioned probabilities of 30.2\% for the rest of 2026 and 56.9\% within the following year; these are empirical indicators, not physical prediction probabilities. The four adopted historical eruption phases do not select a unique ignition phase, but form two loose pairs near $\phi\simeq0.44$ and $\phi\simeq0.62$, used here only as monitoring windows. The 1946 pre-eruption dip is difficult to explain by either a pure accretion-rate decline or standard dust extinction, and may have involved both accretion restructuring and source-dependent obscuration. If the renewed 2026 decline is the true pre-1946 analogue, an eruption around 2026 December remains plausible. Conversely, if post-2024 brightness remains below the 2014--2023 high state, an accretion-deficit estimate gives an earliest lower limit near 2029 May. The data therefore support conditional monitoring windows, not a unique date. These are conditional diagnostic scenarios rather than competing point predictions; the eventual eruption epoch will test their underlying assumptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15245 by Qiang Li, Renzhi Su, Songpeng Pei, Taozhi Yang, Xiaoqin Ren, Xiaowan Zhang, Yongzhi Cai, Yu Liu, Ziwei Ou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: AAVSO 𝐵- and 𝑉-band light curves of T CrB from MJD 52713 (2003 March 15) to MJD 61232 (2026 July 11), binned in 0.01 yr intervals. The upper panel shows the 𝐵 band and the lower panel shows the 𝑉 band; the magnitude axis is inverted so that brighter states appear higher. The gray shaded region marks the 2014–2023 high state, and the red shaded region marks the post-dip phase after 2024 May discussed in the… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/422091 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0405233 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507413 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The unusual 2006 dwarf nova outburst of GK Persei. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15376.x , adsurl =

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    On the nature of the X-ray source in GK Persei. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053017 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505070 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    The Swift X-Ray Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508071 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) on the SWIFT Midex Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507410 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    The Swift/BAT Hard X-Ray Transient Monitor. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14

  8. [8]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    XSPEC: The First Ten Years. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , year = 1996, editor =

    1996

  9. [9]

    AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division \#7 , year = 2003, series =

    XSPEC12: Object-Oriented X-Ray Analysis. AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division \#7 , year = 2003, series =

    2003

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    XMM-Newton observations of the symbiotic recurrent nova T CrB: evolution of X-ray emission during the active phase. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2329 , archivePrefix =. 1908.07722 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  11. [11]

    , keywords =

    Chandra observations of nova KT Eridani in outburst. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2298 , archivePrefix =. 2108.03577 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Swift monitoring of GK Persei during the 2018 dwarf nova outburst. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae650 , archivePrefix =. 2403.05328 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Timing and spectral analysis of GK Persei during the 2010 dwarf nova outburst. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf224 , archivePrefix =. 2502.14277 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Temporal variability and obscuration effects in the X-ray emission of classical nova V339 Delphini (Nova Delphini 2013). , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf420 , archivePrefix =. 2503.10035 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Accretion in the recurrent nova T CrB: Linking the superactive state to the predicted outburst. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348372 , archivePrefix =. 2312.04342 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Spectral classification of the cool giants in symbiotic systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1999105 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/aas:1999105

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    New binary parameters for the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01301.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9711151 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 1998

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    H variability of the recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034623 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311309 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    The B & V light curves for recurrent nova T CrB from 1842-2022, the unique pre- and post-eruption high-states, the complex period changes, and the upcoming eruption in 2025.5 1.3. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad735 , archivePrefix =. 2303.04933 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    , year = 1949, month = jan, volume =

    High-Dispersion Spectrograms of T Coronae Borealis. , year = 1949, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/145106 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/145106 1949

  21. [21]

    Journal for the History of Astronomy , keywords =

    The recurrent nova T CrB had prior eruptions observed near December 1787 and October 1217 AD. Journal for the History of Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1177/00218286231200492 , archivePrefix =. 2308.13668 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Increasing Activity in T CrB Suggests Nova Eruption Is Impending. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbb2c , archivePrefix =. 2009.11902 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  23. [23]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Recurrent nova T CrB has just started its Pre-eruption Dip in March/April 2023, so the eruption should occur around 2024.4 +- 0.3. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2023

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Comprehensive catalogue of the overall best distances and properties of 402 galactic novae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2900 , archivePrefix =. 2210.03181 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    The 2015 super-active state of recurrent nova T CrB and the long term evolution after the 1946 outburst. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2016.01.002 , archivePrefix =. 1602.07470 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Active phases and flickering of a symbiotic recurrent nova T CrB. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1837 , archivePrefix =. 1607.06804 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    T CrB: Radio Observations during the 2016-2017 Super-active State. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c62 , archivePrefix =. 1909.13858 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Symbiotic Star T CrB as an Extreme SU UMa-type Dwarf Nova. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace9dc , archivePrefix =. 2307.13838 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  29. [29]

    Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =

    The ``Super-Active'' Accretion Phase of T CrB has Ended. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ace527 , archivePrefix =. 2307.00255 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    T CrB: the active spectroscopic state (2014-2023) is over. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2014

  31. [31]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Swift observations of the changes in the brightness of the recurrent nova T CrB. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Is the symbiotic recurrent nova T CrB late? Recent photometric evolution and comparison with past pre-outburst behaviour. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf047 , archivePrefix =. 2504.20592 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/160554 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/160554

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Resolving the mass transfer in the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452833 , archivePrefix =. 2501.02984 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    The X-ray rise and fall of the symbiotic recurrent nova system T CrB. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1579 , archivePrefix =. 2405.08980 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Dissecting a Disk-instability Outburst in a Symbiotic Star: NuSTAR and Swift Observations of T Coronae Borealis during the Rise to the Superactive State. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2884 , archivePrefix =. 1906.04770 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  37. [37]

    Recurrent Novae as a Progenitor System of Type Ia Supernovae. I. RS Ophiuchi Subclass: Systems with a Red Giant Companion. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/321601 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104040 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    The progenitors of type-Ia supernovae in semidetached binaries with red giant donors. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833010 , archivePrefix =. 1710.03965 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    A Chandra Low Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer Observation of V4743 Sagittarii: A Supersoft X-Ray Source and a Violently Variable Light Curve. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/378664 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/378664

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Variability and multiperiodic oscillations in the X-ray light curve of the classical nova V4743 Sgr. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10684.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0607157 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2006

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Counter-evidence against multiple frequency nature of 0.75 mHz oscillation in V4743 Sgr. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx442 , archivePrefix =. 1702.05375 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    XMM-Newton X-ray and Ultraviolet Observations of the Fast Nova V2491 Cyg during the Supersoft Source Phase. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/70 , archivePrefix =. 1103.4543 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Suzaku Observation of the Classical Nova V2491 Cyg in Quiescence. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/61 , archivePrefix =. 1506.03326 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Optical observations of `hot' novae returning to quiescence. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2061 , archivePrefix =. 1807.10321 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Multiwavelength observations of V407 Lupi (ASASSN-16kt) - a very fast nova erupting in an intermediate polar. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1759 , archivePrefix =. 1807.00706 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    , keywords =

    V407 Lup, an intermediate polar nova. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1922 , archivePrefix =. 2408.03779 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    Short-period X-ray oscillations in super-soft novae and persistent super-soft sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425178 , archivePrefix =. 1503.00186 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Nova LMC 2009a as observed with XMM-Newton, compared with other novae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1391 , archivePrefix =. 2105.05346 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    X-Ray Spectroscopy of the 2006 Outburst of RS Ophiuchi. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/524054 , archivePrefix =. 0709.4512 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    The Supersoft X-ray Phase of Nova RS Ophiuchi 2006. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/124 , archivePrefix =. 1011.5327 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  51. [51]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Spectral and flux variability in NICER observations and optical spectra of RS Oph. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  52. [52]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    NICER X-ray Observations of V1716 Sco. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Evolution of the Inner Accretion Flow and the White Dwarf Spin Pulse during the 2023 Outburst in GK Persei. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adcf27 , archivePrefix =. 2504.21313 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [55]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    NICER observations of Nova Her 2021. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2021

  55. [56]

    , keywords =

    The Remarkable Spin-down and Ultrafast Outflows of the Highly Pulsed Supersoft Source of Nova Herculis 2021. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac34fd , archivePrefix =. 2110.14058 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    The use and calibration of read-out streaks to increase the dynamic range of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1689 , archivePrefix =. 1309.4816 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [58]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    An 8.4 min period in the archival ZTF light curve of Nova Herculis 2021. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2021

  58. [59]

    , keywords =

    The Rise of Nova V1674 Herculis. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad887f , archivePrefix =. 2410.16460 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [60]

    , keywords =

    X-ray observations of selected cataclysimic variable stars using the Einstein Observatory. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/158836 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/158836

  60. [61]

    RS Ophiuchi (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon , year = 2008, editor =

    High Energy X-ray Emission from Recurrent Novae in Quiescence: T CrB. RS Ophiuchi (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0711.0725 , archivePrefix =. 0711.0725 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0711.0725 2006

  61. [62]

    , keywords =

    Swift Observations of Hard X-ray Emitting White Dwarfs in Symbiotic Stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1992 , archivePrefix =. 0907.0764 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    Dramatic change in the boundary layer in the symbiotic recurrent nova T Coronae Borealis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833747 , archivePrefix =. 1807.01304 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    Symbiotic stars in X-rays. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220792 , archivePrefix =. 1211.6082 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    Estimating Distances from Parallaxes. V. Geometric and Photogeometric Distances to 1.47 Billion Stars in Gaia Early Data Release 3. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , archivePrefix =. 2012.05220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  65. [66]

    , keywords =

    The nova KT Eri Is a recurrent nova with a recurrence time-scale of 40-50 yr. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2923 , archivePrefix =. 2210.10448 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    A possible nova super-remnant surrounding the putative recurrent nova KT Eridani

    Introducing the Condor Array Telescope - IV. A possible nova super-remnant surrounding the putative recurrent nova KT Eridani. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3612 , archivePrefix =. 2310.17055 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [68]

    , keywords =

    Binary Parameters for the Recurrent Nova T Coronae Borealis. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbe63 , archivePrefix =. 2502.20664 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    , keywords =

    The Nature of the Recurrent Nova T Coronae Borealis: Ultraviolet Evidence for a White Dwarf Accretor. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171506 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/171506

  69. [70]

    The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects V , year = 2021, volume =

    Accrete, Accrete, Accrete Bang! (and repeat): The remarkable Recurrent Novae. The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects V , year = 2021, volume =. doi:10.22323/1.368.0044 , archivePrefix =. 1912.13209 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  70. [71]

    Journal of the British Astronomical Association , year = 1975, month = mar, volume =

    Periodic fluctuations in the recurrent nova T CrB. Journal of the British Astronomical Association , year = 1975, month = mar, volume =

    1975

  71. [72]

    British Astronomical Association Variable Star Section Circular , keywords =

    T Coronae Borealis The Pre-Eruption Dip. British Astronomical Association Variable Star Section Circular , keywords =

  72. [73]

    Bulgarian Journal of Physics , keywords =

    Pre-outburst signal in the light curves of the recurrent novae RS Oph and T CrB. Bulgarian Journal of Physics , keywords =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  73. [74]

    Advances in Space Research , keywords =

    Hard X-ray cataclysmic variables. Advances in Space Research , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.006 , archivePrefix =. 1909.06306 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [75]

    , keywords =

    Intermediate polars in the Swift/BAT survey: spectra and white dwarf masses. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811285 , archivePrefix =. 0901.3562 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [76]

    , keywords =

    Hard X-ray view on intermediate polars in the Gaia era. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2952 , archivePrefix =. 1809.05740 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [77]

    , keywords =

    X-Ray Emissions from Accreting White Dwarfs: A Review. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aa6736 , archivePrefix =. 1703.06171 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [78]

    , keywords =

    The massive white dwarf in the recurrent nova TCrB. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/288.4.1027 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9703146 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    Infrared Spectroscopy of Symbiotic Stars. I. Orbits for Well-Known S-Type Systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/301260 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/301260

  79. [80]

    Astronomy Letters , keywords =

    Recurrent Symbiotic Nova T Coronae Borealis before Outburst. Astronomy Letters , keywords =. doi:10.1134/S1063773723090037 , archivePrefix =. 2308.10011 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [81]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Fast and steady re-brightening of the accretion disk of T CrB past the deep minimum of August-September 2023. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2023

Showing first 80 references.