Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 65 references

Growth-fragmentations, Brownian cone excursions and SLE(6) explorations of a quantum disc

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that the nested-growth process extracted from a Brownian excursion in a $2\pi/3$ cone has the law of the growth-fragmentation process $X_{3/2}$, and hence describes the branching $\mathrm{SLE}_6$ boundary length process…

desk verdict Strong new Brownian excursion theory with an exact growth-fragmentation identification, but the final branching step is only sketched and must be completed before Theorem 1.1 is fully established. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03010 v1 pith:NKLTD3DZ submitted 2025-01-06 math.PR math-phmath.MP

William Da Silva , Ellen Powell , Alexander Watson This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60J6560G5160J8060G5260J55
keywords growth-fragmentationBrownianconeexcursionsSLE6LiouvillequantumgravitydiscstableLévyprocessesmatingoftreespositiveself-similarMarkov
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a purely Brownian object — the nested family of cone excursions cut out by a planar Brownian path that stays inside a cone of angle $2\pi/3$ until exiting at the apex — is an exact instance of a previously studied growth-fragmentation process. The process records, at each level of a local time, the total lengths of the intervals into which the excursion has split, and the main theorem identifies its law with $X_{3/2}$, the growth-fragmentation driven by a positive self-similar Markov process of index $3/2$. Because this same correlated Brownian motion is the standard 'mating of trees' encoding of a $\sqrt{8/3}$-quantum disc decorated with space-filling $\mathrm{SLE}_6$, the result gives an explicit law for the total quantum boundary length along every branch of an $\mathrm{SLE}_6$ exploration. The proof is carried out entirely with Brownian excursion theory, so the Liouville quantum gravity statement is a corollary rather than an input. The payoff is that an abstract growth-fragmentation law is realized pathwise by Brownian motion and simultaneously governs the quantum boundary length process.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the nested cone-excursion interval construction. For each time $t$ in the excursion, the time-reversed past $e_{t,-}$ has its own forward cone-free local time $\varsigma_t$; setting $g_t(b)=t-\tau_t(b)$ and taking $d_t(b)$ to be the first simultaneous running infimum of the future that falls below the whole past interval produces the family of disjoint intervals whose total lengths form $Z(a)$. Two tools carry the identification with $X_{3/2}$: the uniform-time description of the backward cone excursion measure, which gives the total cone-free local time a Lebesgue measure marginal and couples the past and future Brownian paths through a single stopping rule, and a martingale change of measure that turns the spectrally negative $3/2$-stable process conditioned to be absorbed at $0$ into the locally largest fragment $Z^\star$ with driving Lévy exponent $\Phi_{3/2}$. The remaining step is a branching argument: every fragment lies in the lineage of $Z^\star$, and the children of $Z^\star$ are conditionally independent copies started from their jump sizes.

What would settle it

A direct check of the conditional-independence equality asserted in Section 5.3 for the children of the locally largest fragment would settle the main theorem: simulate a $2\pi/3$ Brownian cone excursion, build the fragments up to a small time $a$, and test whether the joint law of the sub-excursions created by the jumps of $Z^\star$ factorizes as the product of the laws $P^{z_i}$; any violation would break the identification of $Z$ with $X_{3/2}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for an excursion $e$ with law $P^z$ in the $2\pi/3$ cone, the process $Z$ built from nested intervals has the law of the growth-fragmentation process $X_{3/2}$ started from the total length of the starting point. At every time $t$ of the excursion, the time-reversed past has its own forward cone-free local time; the value $b$ of that local time selects an interval $(g_t(b), d_t(b))$ whose right endpoint is the first time at which both coordinates of the future path reach a running minimum below the whole past trajectory. As $b$ decreases, these intervals split, and $Z(a)$ is the multiset of the total lengths of their displacements. The authors show that this multiset evolves as a Markovian self-similar population, identify its driving Lévy process through the branch that follows the locally largest fragment, and conclude that its law is that of $X_{3/2}$. Through the mating-of-trees correspondence, this becomes the statement that the branching total boundary length process of a space-filling $\mathrm{SLE}_6$ exploration of a $\sqrt{8/3}$-quantum disc is $X_{3/2}$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every fragment of the process descends from the branch following the locally largest sub-excursion, and that the children of that branch are conditionally independent copies with laws determined by their sizes; the paper sketches rather than fully proves these two claims.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The branching total quantum boundary length process of a space-filling $\mathrm{SLE}_6$ exploration of a $\sqrt{8/3}$-quantum disc has an exact law, $X_{3/2}$, rather than only a scaling-limit description.
  • The duration of a $2\pi/3$ cone excursion has an explicit density, which gives the area law for a unit-boundary $\sqrt{8/3}$-quantum disc and supplies an explicit Lévy measure for Brownian motion subordinated at backward cone times in this case.
  • For an area-biased quantum disc and a quantum-typical target point, the split of total boundary length between left and right at any exploration time is uniform and independent of the total boundary process.
  • The branch of the exploration targeting a uniformly chosen time has the law of a spectrally negative $3/2$-stable process conditioned to be absorbed continuously at $0$.
  • The process $M(n)=3^{-1/2}\sum_{|u|=n} Z_u(0)^2$ is a uniformly integrable martingale that converges almost surely to the total duration of the excursion, equivalently to the quantum area of the disc.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, not pursued in the paper, is to track the pair of left and right boundary lengths rather than only their sum; the techniques here suggest that the branching structure for general $\gamma$ should be a two-dimensional self-similar Markov tree, in line with the authors' conjecture.
  • The two-Brownian-motion construction of the spectrally positive $3/2$-stable process conditioned to stay positive looks like a two-dimensional analogue of a classical one-dimensional construction; testing whether the same recipe works for other stable indices would show whether the special role of $3/2$ is tied to $\sqrt{8/3}$ quantum gravity.
  • Because the proof is entirely Brownian, the construction gives a direct simulation recipe for the growth-fragmentation process and the quantum boundary length process: generate correlated planar Brownian paths and record simultaneous running infima, which could be used to check the law numerically and to estimate quantum disc areas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a growth-fragmentation process Z from the excursions of a correlated planar Brownian motion in a cone of angle 2π/3, and proves that Z has the law of the Bertoin–Curien–Kortchemski growth-fragmentation X_{3/2} driven by the positive 3/2-self-similar Markov process with Lamperti exponent Φ_{3/2} (Theorem 1.1). Via the mating-of-trees encoding, this is translated into the statement that the branching total quantum boundary length process of a space-filling SLE_6 exploration of a √(8/3)-quantum disc has the law of X_{3/2} (Theorem 1.2). Along the way the paper develops a Bismut description of backward cone excursions, proves an explicit joint law for the displacement and duration of 2π/3-cone excursions (Proposition 4.1), derives target-invariance properties (Propositions 1.5 and 4.11), and gives a pathwise Brownian construction of the spectrally positive 3/2-stable process conditioned to stay positive (Theorem 4.16). The main probabilistic ingredients up to Section 5.2 are proved in detail, but the final proof of Theorem 1.1 in Section 5.3 relies on two branching claims that are only sketched and deferred to [ADS22].

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is a substantial result: it gives an exact, purely Brownian realization of the growth-fragmentation process X_{3/2} and, through the mating-of-trees theorem, describes the branching total boundary length process of SLE_6 explorations of the √(8/3)-quantum disc. The paper contains several independently valuable explicit computations, including the joint law of displacement and duration of 2π/3-cone excursions (Proposition 4.1), which solves Le Gall's question for the corresponding Lévy measure, and the pathwise construction of the conditioned 3/2-stable process (Theorem 4.16). The derivations in Sections 3 and 4 are largely self-contained and use only Brownian excursion theory and Lévy process techniques, with no fitted parameters beyond the normalization of local time. The main caveat is that the proof of the central branching theorem is not fully contained in the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.3, first claim after Theorem 5.5] The claim that almost surely every fragment of Z lies in the lineage of the locally largest branch Z* is load-bearing for Theorem 1.1, but the proof is only sketched. The open/closed argument for the set A uses the assertion that 'the locally largest excursions are always in Z*', which is essentially the statement being proved. A fully detailed proof is needed, in particular to justify that the local largest evolution inside e_t^b coincides with the branch Z* rather than merely being consistent with its definition.
  2. [Section 5.3, equation (5.8)] The conditional independence of the children of Z* with laws P^{z_i} is the second load-bearing claim of Theorem 1.1, and the paper explicitly says 'we feel free to skip the details to avoid cumbersome technical work'. The proof sketch invokes two Poisson point processes of backward and forward cone excursions under Bismut's description, but it does not verify that the ranking by descending size, the coupling between the two Brownian motions from Theorem 3.16, and the conditioning on the event that the branch follows the locally largest evolution are compatible with the Poisson structure. These details are essential and cannot be replaced by a reference to a different setting without a precise transfer statement.
  3. [Section 5.3, first paragraph] The text says that both remaining claims 'are adapted from [ADS22]', but no theorem in [ADS22] with matching hypotheses is stated. Since the present setting involves 2π/3-cone excursions and a correlated two-dimensional Brownian motion, rather than the half-plane excursions of [ADS22], the cited arguments do not automatically apply. The authors should either state and prove a precise transfer result or include full proofs of both claims.
  4. [Section 5.2, definition of t*] The uniqueness and well-definedness of the time t* of the locally largest fragment is asserted by reference to the 'topological arguments presented in [ADS22, Section 2.5]'. Since Z* is the driving process of the entire cell system in Theorem 5.5, this assertion is load-bearing. A proof or a precise statement of the cited result with verifiable hypotheses should be included.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Proposition 3.15] In the proof of Proposition 3.15, 'week convergence' should read 'weak convergence'.
  2. [Section 5.4, proof of Theorem 5.6] The computation of E^{P^z}[ζ] = ∥z∥_1^2/√3 is referred to as 'a back-of-the-envelope calculation'; since this identity is used in the martingale argument, it would be better to display the short derivation from Proposition 4.1.
  3. [Section 1.1, equation (1.4)] There is a typographical inconsistency in the definition of ~g_t(b), where the tilde symbol is rendered on the wrong side of the variable; this should be cleaned up for readability.
  4. [Section 5.1, Proposition 5.2] In the statement of Proposition 5.2, 'spectrally negative3 2–stable' is missing spacing and correct exponent formatting; similar formatting issues occur in several other displayed statements.
  5. [Section 4.2, Step 1 of Proposition 4.8] The absolute continuity argument for Y(a) is somewhat compressed; in particular, the transition from the density of (Ξ'(a), V(a)) to the joint density F and the subsequent integration over x,y,z could be expanded for clarity, though the mathematical content appears sound.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Brownian derivation of Z and its identification with the external BCK18 growth-fragmentation X_{3/2} is self-contained, with self-citations used only as a proof template.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The main object Z is constructed directly from Brownian cone excursions via local times and interval splittings (Section 1.1), and the target law X_{3/2} is imported from the independent literature (BCK18, BBCK18), not reverse-engineered from it. The key identifications are carried out inside the paper: the Bismut description (Theorem 3.16) is proved from Poisson point process and time-reversal arguments; the explicit joint law (Proposition 4.1) is obtained by matching an explicitly computed Laplace transform with Le Gall's formula; the law of the uniform exploration ZT is derived as a spectrally negative 3/2-stable process conditioned to be absorbed at 0 (Proposition 5.2) through Bismut's description and duality, not assumed; and the locally largest fragment Z* is shown in Theorem 5.4 to have Lamperti exponent (5.3), which is exactly the BCK18 exponent of the driving process of X_{3/2}. The only overlapping-author citations are to ADS22, used as a proof template for the two branching claims in Section 5.3 and for the topological well-definedness of the locally largest branch t* in Section 5.2. These citations do not assert the target equality and do not define the target process; they supply a technical argument from a published, externally falsifiable prior paper with different parameters. If the sketched branching arguments are incomplete, that is a correctness/completeness gap, not circularity: (5.8) is asserted from the Bismut description and Poissonian structure rather than reduced to its conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to explain. The local-time normalization cθ=1 is a stated convention, and all subsequent constants are computed from stable Lévy measures and the Bessel-function evaluation, not fitted to the target law. Hence the central claim has independent content and the paper should receive the lowest circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, dimensions, or external objects are postulated; all constructions are derived from Brownian motion and existing processes. The only convention is the choice of local time normalization, which is explicitly stated and not fitted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • Local time normalization constant cθ = 1 (convention)
    The excursion measures nθ and n are defined up to a multiplicative constant; Remark 3.4 fixes cθ=1. The matching to X_{3/2} depends on this normalization, but it is a stated convention, not a parameter fitted to data.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Regenerative set and local time theory for the sets of forward cone-free times and backward cone times (existence of local times ℓθ, lθ and inverse local times τθ, tθ).
    Used throughout Section 3 to define excursion point processes; cites [Mai71] and [LG87].
  • domain assumption Le Gall's theorem that the time-changed process W∘tθ is a (2−α)-stable Lévy process, with Lévy measure (3.4) whose angular part mθ is a priori unknown.
    Starting point for the disintegration of nθ in Proposition 3.13 and for the explicit computation in Section 4.1; taken from [LG87].
  • domain assumption The mating-of-trees encoding: the left/right quantum boundary length process of a space-filling SLE6 exploration of a √(8/3)-quantum disc has law P^{(0,1)} (Theorem 2.6, from [MS19, AG21]).
    Transfers Brownian results to LQG/SLE statements (Theorem 1.2, Corollaries 1.4/1.6/1.8); the paper explicitly says 'assuming the mating of trees encoding'.
  • standard math Input properties of the growth-fragmentation family Xα from [BCK18, BBCK18]: Lévy measure (2.9), the locally largest evolution, and the martingale Lemma 5.3 from [LGR20].
    Defines the target law X_{3/2} and supplies the change-of-measure ingredient used in Theorem 5.4.
  • standard math Fluctuation theory and moment estimates for stable Lévy processes quoted from [KP21] (Theorem 1.13, Corollary 3.5, Theorem 3.11).
    Used in Lemma 4.7, in the absolute continuity argument in Proposition 4.8, and in Lemmas 4.14 and 4.15.
  • standard math Doob h-transform descriptions of stable processes conditioned to stay positive or absorbed continuously at 0, with Lamperti exponents (2.7) and (2.8), from [Cha96, CC06, KP13].
    Needed to identify the law of S in Theorem 4.16 and of the uniform exploration ZT in Proposition 5.2.
  • domain assumption Characterization of the conditioned Brownian excursion P^z as the unique law with Brownian transition probabilities conditioned to stay in the quadrant, per [MS19, Theorem 3.1].
    P^z is the central measure; the convergence in Proposition 3.15 uses this characterization to identify the limit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Growth-fragmentations, Brownian cone excursions and SLE(6) explorations of a quantum disc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NKLTD3DZ

@misc{pith2026250103010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Growth-fragmentations, Brownian cone excursions and SLE(6) explorations of a quantum disc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NKLTD3DZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03010}
}
abstract

The aim of this article is to present a growth-fragmentation process naturally embedded in a Brownian excursion from boundary to apex in a cone of angle $2\pi/3$. This growth-fragmentation process corresponds, via the so-called mating-of-trees encoding arXiv:1409.7055, to the quantum boundary length process associated with a branching $\mathrm{SLE}_6$ exploration of a $\gamma= \sqrt{8/3}$ quantum disc. However, our proof uses only Brownian motion techniques, and along the way we discover various properties of Brownian cone excursions and their connections with stable L\'evy processes. Assuming the mating of trees encoding, our results imply several fundamental properties of the ${\gamma}= \sqrt{8/3}$-quantum disc $\mathrm{SLE}_6$-exploration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03010 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The growth-fragmentation Z embedded in cone excursions. If t is a time in the excursion, we record the forward cone excursions of e t,− (blue). We also depict some nested cone excursions in grey, to suggest that there is an accumulation of them inside each maximal excursion. For 0 ≤ b ≤ ς t , we construct (purple) an interval (g t (b), dt (b)) containing t such that g t (b) = t − τ t (b) and d t (b) − t is the first… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. , normalised so that (L0, R0) = (0, 1), has the law P (0,1) θ from below (1.1), where θ is as in (1.8). See Theorem 2.6 for an exact statement. −i η([0, t]) η(t) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Branches of the space-filling SLE6 η on the p 8/3–quantum disc towards x and y. (a) The branch of η towards x and y (purple) is the same. (b) The two branches get disconnected: a loop has been cut out, surrounding x. The branch η x targeted at x is shown in (purple and then) red, and the branch η y targeted at y is in (purple and then) blue. Simultaneously constructing the branches towards all points in the disc (wi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The total boundary process towards z ∈ D. At time s along the branch η z , we record the total boundary length (dashed red) of the component containing z (blue). We stress once again that our proof of Theorem 1.2 relies only on Brownian motion arguments (assuming the m…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Different situations when the branch towards z has a jump in [MSW22]: (a) the CPI discovers a new CLEκ loop; (b) the CPI hits the boundary of D (or itself); (c) the CPI hits a previously visited CLEκ loop. The first case corresponds to positive jumps, (b) and (c) to ne…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Forward cone-free times of planar (correlated) Brownian motion. The reader should imagine accumulation of cone-free times, as suggested by the grey excursion in the middle. The forward cone excursions are shown in blue. Notice that excursions under the measure nθ remai…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Backward cone times of planar (correlated) Brownian motion. The reader should imagine accumulation of cone times, as suggested by the grey quadrant in the middle of the picture. Definition 3.7. The backward cone excursion process is the process eθ = (eθ(s), s > 0) on (…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The Bismut description of nθ. Theorem 3.16. (Bismut description of nθ) Let nθ be the measure on R+ × E defined by nθ(dT, de) = 10≤T ≤ζ dT · nθ(de). Then for any non-negative functional F on E and g on (0, ∞): nθ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The backward cone excursion straddling t. We start a correlated Brownian motion from 0, and look at the backward cone excursion straddling time t (delimited by the two black cones). Looking back from time t (blue trajectory), we record all the forward cone excursions (…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The backward cone time process, seen backwards from time t. The backward cone excursions of B are represented in grey. The excursion process is stopped when an excursion straddles 0 (red), i.e. when ζ > t − t(s −). ▷ Step 4: Concluding the proof for a deterministic ti…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A \" d \'e kon and W

    E. A \" d \'e kon and W. Da Silva. Growth-fragmentation process embedded in a planar B rownian excursion. Probability T heory and R elated F ields , 183 (1):125--166, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Ang and E

    M. Ang and E. Gwynne. Liouville quantum gravity surfaces with boundary as matings of trees. Annales de l' I nstitut H enri P oincar \'e , P robabilit \'e s et S tatistiques , 57 (1):1--53, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    J. Aru, N. Holden, E. Powell, and X. Sun. Brownian half-plane excursion and critical L iouville quantum gravity. Journal of the L ondon M athematical S ociety , 107 (1):441--509, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Bertoin, T

    J. Bertoin, T. Budd, N. Curien, and I. Kortchemski. Martingales in self-similar growth-fragmentations and their connections with random planar maps. P robability T heory and R elated F ields , 172 :663--724, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Bertoin, N

    J. Bertoin, N. Curien, and I. Kortchemski. Random planar maps and growth-fragmentations. The A nnals of P robability , 46 (1):207--260, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Bertoin, N

    J. Bertoin, N. Curien, and A. Riera. Self-similar M arkov trees and scaling limits. arXiv:2407.07888 , 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07888

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    J. Bertoin. Splitting at the infimum and excursions in half-lines for random walks and L \'e vy processes. Stochastic processes and their applications , 47(1):17--35, 1993

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    J. Bertoin. Lévy processes . Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 121 , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996

    work page 1996

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Berestycki

    N. Berestycki. An elementary approach to G aussian multiplicative chaos. Electronic communications in P robability , 22 :1--12, 2017

    2017

  2. [10]

    J. Bertoin. Markovian growth-fragmentation processes. Bernoulli , 23 :1082--1101, 2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Gwynne. Random walks on mated- CRT planar maps and L iouville B rownian motion. Communications in M athematical P hysics , 395 (2):773--857, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    N. H. Bingham. Limit theorems for occupation times of M arkov processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete , 17 :1--22, 1971

    1971

  5. [13]

    N. H. Bingham. Maxima of sums of random variables and suprema of stable processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete , 26 :273--296, 1973

    1973

  6. [14]

    Bettinelli and G

    J. Bettinelli and G. Miermont. Compact brownian surfaces I : Brownian disks. Probability T heory and R elated F ields , 167 (3-4):555--614, 2017

    2017

  7. [15]

    E. Baur, G. Miermont, and G. Ray. Classification of scaling limits of uniform quadrangulations with a boundary. The A nnals of P robability , 47 (6):3397--3477, 2019

    2019

  8. [16]

    Berestycki and E

    N. Berestycki and E. Powell. Gaussian free field, L iouville quantum gravity and G aussian multiplicative chaos. Lecture notes , 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    K. Burdzy. Brownian paths and cones. The A nnals of P robability , 13 (3):1006--1010, 1985

    1985

  10. [18]

    M. E. Caballero and L. Chaumont. Conditioned stable L \'e vy processes and the L amperti representation. Journal of A pplied P robability , 43 (4):967--983, 2006

    2006

  11. [19]

    Chaumont

    L. Chaumont. Conditionings and path decompositions for L \'e vy processes. Stochastic processes and their applications , 64 (1):39--54, 1996

    1996

  12. [20]

    J. Ding, J. Dub \'e dat, A. Dunlap, and H. Falconet. Tightness of liouville first passage percolation for (0,2) . Publications math \'e matiques de l'IH \'E S , 132 (1):353--403, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Uniqueness of the critical and supercritical L iouville quantum gravity metrics

    Jian Ding and Ewain Gwynne. Uniqueness of the critical and supercritical L iouville quantum gravity metrics. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 126 (1):216--333, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees

    Bertrand Duplantier, Jason Miller, and Scott Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity as a mating of trees. Ast \'e risque , 427 , 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Duplantier and S

    B. Duplantier and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and KPZ . Inventiones mathematicae , 185 (2):333--393, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Da Silva

    W. Da Silva. Self-similar signed growth-fragmentations. Electronic J ournal of P robability , 28 :1--45, 2023

    2023

  17. [25]

    Da Silva and J

    W. Da Silva and J. C. Pardo. Spatial growth-fragmentations and excursions from hyperplanes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 181 :104551, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Arthur Erd\'elyi, Wilhelm Magnus, Fritz Oberhettinger, and Francesco G. Tricomi. Higher transcendental functions. V ol. II . Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Inc., Melbourne, FL, 1981. Based on notes left by Harry Bateman, Reprint of the 1953 original

    1981

  19. [27]

    Gwynne, N

    E. Gwynne, N. Holden, and X. Sun. Mating of trees for random planar maps and L iouville quantum gravity: a survey. arXiv preprint:1910.04713 , 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04713

    1910 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Gwynne and J

    E. Gwynne and J. Miller. Scaling limit of the uniform infinite half-plane quadrangulation in the G romov- H ausdorff- P rokhorov-uniform topology. Electronic J ournal of P robability , 22 :1--47, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Gwynne and J

    E. Gwynne and J. Miller. Chordal _6 explorations of a quantum disk. Electronic J ournal of P robability , 23 :1--24, 2018

    2018

  22. [30]

    Gwynne and J

    E. Gwynne and J. Miller. Existence and uniqueness of the L iouville quantum gravity metric for (0,2) . Inventiones mathematicae , 223 (1):213--333, 2021

    2021

  23. [31]

    Gwynne, J

    E. Gwynne, J. Miller, and S. Sheffield. The T utte embedding of the mated- CRT map converges to L iouville quantum gravity. The A nnals of P robability , 49 (4):1677--1717, 2021

    2021

  24. [32]

    H egh-Krohn

    R. H egh-Krohn. A general class of quantum fields without cut-offs in two space-time dimensions. Communications in M athematical P hysics , 21 (3):244--255, 1971

    1971

  25. [33]

    Liouville quantum gravity on the unit disk

    Yichao Huang, R\'emi Rhodes, and Vincent Vargas. Liouville quantum gravity on the unit disk. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e Probab. Stat. , 54(3):1694--1730, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Holden and X

    N. Holden and X. Sun. Convergence of uniform triangulations under the C ardy embedding. Acta M athematica , 230 (1):93--203, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    J.-P. Kahane. Sur le chaos multiplicatif. Ann. Sci. Math. Qu \'e bec , 9 (2):105--150, 1985

    1985

  28. [36]

    Kuznetsov and J

    A. Kuznetsov and J. C. Pardo. Fluctuations of stable processes and exponential functionals of hypergeometric L \'e vy processes. Acta A pplicandae M athematicae , 123 :113--139, 2013

    2013

  29. [37]

    Kyprianou and J.C

    A.E. Kyprianou and J.C. Pardo. Stable L évy processes via L amperti-type representations . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    V. G. Knizhnik, Alexander M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov. Fractal structure of 2 D quantum gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A , 3 :819, 1988

    1988

  31. [39]

    On extrema of stable processes

    Alexey Kuznetsov. On extrema of stable processes. Ann. Probab. , 39 (3):1027--1060, 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    A. E. Kyprianou. Fluctuations of L \'e vy processes with applications: I ntroductory L ectures . Springer, 2014

    2014

  33. [41]

    Lamperti

    J. Lamperti. Semi-stable M arkov processes I . Zeitschrift f \"u r Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete , 22 (3):205--225, 1972

    1972

  34. [42]

    J.-F. Le Gall. Mouvement brownien, cônes et processus stables. Probability T heory and R elated F ields , 76 :587–627, 1987

    1987

  35. [43]

    J.-F. Le Gall. Uniqueness and universality of the B rownian map. The A nnals of P robability , 41 (4):2880--2960, 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Le Gall and A

    J.-F. Le Gall and A. Riera. Growth-fragmentation processes in B rownian motion indexed by the B rownian tree. The A nnals of P robability , 48 (4):1742--1784, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Maisonneuve

    B. Maisonneuve. Ensembles r \'e g \'e n \'e ratifs, temps locaux et subordinateurs. S \'e minaire de P robabilit \'e s U niversit \'e de S trasbourg , pages 147--169, 1971

    1971

  38. [46]

    Miermont

    G. Miermont. The B rownian map is the scaling limit of uniform random plane quadrangulations. Acta mathematica , 210 (2):319--401, 2013

    2013

  39. [47]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Imaginary geometry IV : interior rays, whole-plane reversibility, and space-filling trees. Probability T heory and R elated F ields , 169 (3):729--869, 2017

    2017

  40. [48]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity spheres as matings of finite-diameter trees. Annales de l' I nstitut H enri P oincar \'e , P robabilit \'e s et S tatistiques , 55 (3):1712--1750, 2019

    2019

  41. [49]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and the B rownian map I : the QLE(8/3,0) metric. Inventiones mathematicae , 219 (1):75--152, 2020

    2020

  42. [50]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and the B rownian map II : geodesics and continuity of the embedding. The A nnals of P robability , 49 (6):2732--2829, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Miller and S

    J. Miller and S. Sheffield. Liouville quantum gravity and the B rownian map III : the conformal structure is determined. Probability T heory and R elated F ields , 179 (3):1183--1211, 2021

    2021

  44. [52]

    Miller, S

    J. Miller, S. Sheffield, and W. Werner. Simple conformal loop ensembles on L iouville quantum gravity. The A nnals of P robability , 50 (3):905--949, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    R. C. Mullin. On the enumeration of tree-rooted maps. Canadian J ournal of M athematics , 19 :174--183, 1967

    1967

  46. [54]

    J. Pitman. Combinatorial stochastic processes , volume 1875 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006. Lectures from the 32nd Summer School on Probability Theory held in Saint-Flour, July 7--24, 2002, With a foreword by Jean Picard

    2006

  47. [55]

    A. M. Polyakov. Quantum geometry of bosonic strings. Physics L etters B , 103 (3):207--210, 1981

    1981

  48. [56]

    Rogers and J

    L. Rogers and J. Pitman. Markov functions. The A nnals of P robability , 9 (4):573--582, 1981

    1981

  49. [57]

    Revuz and M

    D. Revuz and M. Yor. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Third Edition, 1999

    1999

  50. [58]

    L\' e vy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , volume 68 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    Ken-iti Sato. L\' e vy processes and infinitely divisible distributions , volume 68 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, revised edition, 2013. Translated from the 1990 Japanese original

    2013

  51. [59]

    O. Schramm. Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Israel J ournal of M athematics , 118 (1):221--288, 2000

    2000

  52. [60]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield. Exploration trees and conformal loop ensembles. Duke M athematical J ournal , 147 (1):79--129, 2009

    2009

  53. [61]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield. Conformal weldings of random surfaces: SLE and the quantum gravity zipper. The A nnals of P robability , 44 (5):3474--3545, 2016

    2016

  54. [62]

    Sheffield

    S. Sheffield. Quantum gravity and inventory accumulation. The A nnals of P robability , 44 (6):3804--3848, 2016

    2016

  55. [63]

    M. Shimura. Excursions in a cone for two-dimensional B rownian motion. Journal of M athematics of K yoto University , 25 (3):433--443, 1985

    1985

  56. [64]

    F. Spitzer. Some theorems concerning two-dimensional B rownian motion. Transactions of the A merican M athematical S ociety , 87 :187--197, 1958

    1958

  57. [65]

    Sheffield and M

    S. Sheffield and M. Wang. Field-measure correspondence in L iouville quantum gravity almost surely commutes with all conformal maps simultaneously. arXiv:1605.06171 , 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06171

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.