REVIEW 1 cited by
Phase transitions for the existence of unregularized M-estimators in single index models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This paper studies phase transitions for the existence of unregularized M-estimators under proportional asymptotics where the sample size $n$ and feature dimension $p$ grow proportionally with $n/p \to \delta \in (1, \infty)$. We study the existence of M-estimators in single-index models where the response $y_i$ depends on covariates $x_i \sim N(0, I_p)$ through an unknown index ${w} \in \mathbb{R}^p$ and an unknown link function. An explicit expression is derived for the critical threshold $\delta_\infty$ that determines the phase transition for the existence of the M-estimator, generalizing the results of Cand\'es & Sur (2020) for binary logistic regression to other single-index models. Furthermore, we investigate the existence of a solution to the nonlinear system of equations governing the asymptotic behavior of the M-estimator when it exists. The existence of solution to this system for $\delta > \delta_\infty$ remains largely unproven outside the global null in binary logistic regression. We address this gap with a proof that the system admits a solution if and only if $\delta > \delta_\infty$, providing a comprehensive theoretical foundation for proportional asymptotic results that require as a prerequisite the existence of a solution to the system.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A High-Dimensional Statistical Theory for Convex and Nonconvex Matrix Sensing
In Gaussian matrix sensing, nonconvex factorized least squares is asymptotically equivalent to matrix hard thresholding, while convex nuclear-norm regularization behaves like soft thresholding, making nonconvex no wor...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.