Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 95 references

Compact superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors with low microwave loss and high mechanical coherence for scalable quantum circuits

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A planarized-sacrificial-layer process makes aluminum vacuum-gap capacitors with 150 nm gaps, mechanical quality factors up to 40 million, and frequency disorder below 0.2 percent across arrays.

desk verdict A genuinely useful process disclosure that deserves peer review; the cryogenic gap-control claim is partly inferred rather than directly measured, but the mechanical coherence and reproducibility results are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03211 v2 pith:GOSCBEME submitted 2025-01-06 quant-ph physics.app-ph

Amir Youssefi , Mahdi Chegnizadeh , Marco Scigliuzzo , Tobias J. Kippenberg This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.app-ph
keywords vacuum-gapcapacitorcircuitoptomechanicssuperconductingcircuitsmechanicalresonatorqualityfactorfabricationprocesschemicalpolishingmicrowaveloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a specific fabrication sequence—etching a trench in silicon, filling it with a planarized silicon-dioxide sacrificial layer, depositing a suspended aluminum drumhead, and releasing it with HF vapor—turns the vacuum-gap capacitor from an irreproducible component into a scalable one. The central claim is that after cooldown to cryogenic temperature the aluminum drumhead becomes uniformly tensile and flat, so the capacitor gap is set lithographically by the trench depth rather than by random buckling. With this control, the authors report mechanical quality factors up to 40 million, an average of 4.3 million across 119 devices from three batches, microwave-frequency disorder below 0.2 percent in a 12-site array, and a compact footprint. A sympathetic reader would care because this is the missing fabrication reliability for circuit optomechanics: reproducible mechanical frequencies and low loss are exactly what is needed for mechanical arrays, qubit-mechanics interfaces, quantum memories, and tests of quantum mechanics at larger mass.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the flat-geometry vacuum-gap capacitor: a circular aluminum drum suspended over a bottom electrode inside a silicon trench, with no dielectric between the plates. The sequence that carries the argument is trench DRIE etching; bottom aluminum deposition and patterning; low-temperature oxide (LTO) sacrificial fill roughly six times the trench depth; CMP planarization to below 10 nm topography; ion-beam etch-back to the substrate; top aluminum evaporation; and HF-vapor release. Cooling to 10 mK converts room-temperature compressive stress in the aluminum into tensile stress, flattening the drum and making the gap equal to trench depth minus bottom-electrode thickness; the measured 350 MPa tensile stress then gives a dissipation-dilution factor $D_Q\approx100$, which the authors use to explain the factor-1000 gap between the aluminum material quality factor and the measured mechanical quality factor.

What would settle it

Cryogenic optical profilometry or capacitance-based gap extraction on a released chip: if a drum that buckled at room temperature is not flat at 10 mK, or if the measured gap differs from trench depth minus bottom-electrode thickness by more than the reported tolerance, the central assumption fails. A simpler check is a large-batch histogram: if mechanical frequency disorder across identical drums exceeds the reported 0.2 percent, the claimed lithographic gap control is not being achieved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is the "flat-geometry" vacuum-gap capacitor: a drumhead whose operating gap is determined by a lithographically etched trench and a planarized sacrificial layer, not by the uncontrolled buckling of a released thin film. The authors argue that at room temperature the aluminum top plate may buckle into a dome, but cooling to 10 mK induces enough tensile stress from differential thermal contraction that the plate flattens; the gap is then the trench depth minus the bottom-electrode thickness, about 150 nm. They support this with mechanical-frequency fits giving $\sigma_{\mathrm{Al}} = 350 \pm 10\%$ MPa, a <0.2% frequency-disorder figure in a 12-site array, release yields near 100% for gaps above 150 nm, and quality factors up to $4\times10^7$, about 100 times higher than earlier vacuum-gap electromechanical devices. The same chips show microwave internal quality factors up to $2\times10^6$ at high photon number, with argon-ion milling of the galvanic contact reducing cavity heating by an order of magnitude.

Load-bearing premise

The process assumes that cooling from room temperature to 10 mK makes the aluminum drumhead uniformly tensile and flat enough that the final vacuum gap equals the trench depth minus the bottom-electrode thickness across the whole chip.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gap size and mechanical frequency become design parameters set by lithography: trench radius sets the drum frequency ($\Omega_m \propto 1/R$) and trench depth sets the capacitor gap, so arrays of nearly identical electromechanical circuits can be fabricated without post-selection.
  • Mechanical coherence reaches the millisecond regime, making ground-state cooling, motion squeezing, and sideband-resolved quantum control routine on this platform, as the cited companion papers demonstrate.
  • Microwave loss is low enough for circuit QED uses: internal quality factors of $10^5$ at moderate photon number and $2\times10^6$ at high photon number, compatible with vacuum-gap transmon qubits.
  • The process is scalable to lattices: the authors report a 12-site SSH array with frequency disorder below 0.2%, a 24-site topological lattice, and a mechanical hexamer with collective ground-state cooling.
  • Footprint shrinks compared with planar capacitors and with metalized dielectric membranes, because the vacuum gap stacks vertically instead of spreading the electrodes across the chip.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the low-temperature flattening is as reliable as the batch statistics suggest, the same trench-plus-planarization route could be transferred to other superconducting metals, such as tantalum, or to sapphire once adhesion and planarization are solved, since the mechanism only requires a larger thermal contraction of the top plate than the substrate.
  • The reported frequency disorder is set by optical lithography; the supplementary material notes that e-beam or deep-UV lithography could reduce disorder to roughly 0.01-0.1%, which would make larger topological or many-body mechanical arrays viable.
  • The design deliberately exploits room-temperature buckling to aid release and then relies on cooldown for flatness, suggesting a quantitative trade-off between release yield (dome height) and operating gap (trench depth) that the paper does not fully formalize.
  • A direct cryogenic gap measurement, rather than inference from mechanical frequency, would convert the central assumption into a verified parameter and would be the natural next characterization step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fabrication process for superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors based on a planarized SiO2 sacrificial layer and a 'flat-geometry' aluminum drumhead. The central claims are that the process yields vacuum gaps on the order of 150 nm, mechanical quality factors up to 40 million, low microwave loss, and sufficiently low frequency disorder for scalable optomechanical arrays. The main supporting evidence is a detailed process flow with SEM/FIB cross-sections, room-temperature profilometry, ring-down measurements, and statistics over 119 devices from three batches, with quantum-level system results cited to companion papers [1-3].

Significance. If the gap-control claim holds, the process is a significant advance: it offers a design-defined vacuum gap with high mechanical coherence, small footprint, and batch reproducibility, which would enable large optomechanical lattices and qubit-mechanics interfaces. The manuscript's strengths include its unusually detailed process documentation, explicit parameter tables, SEM/FIB verification of each step, batch-to-batch statistics, and a public data repository (Zenodo), all of which are valuable to the community. However, two load-bearing claims are not directly substantiated in this manuscript: the absolute vacuum-gap size at 10 mK and the 'low microwave loss' assertion, which is only cited to a companion paper. These issues are addressable with additional data or rescoped claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4, Fig. 13b and Fig. 16c] The 'theory' curve is not an independent verification of the model. The stress value sigma_Al = 350 MPa is obtained by fitting the measured drumhead frequencies to Eq. (2), and the same fitted relation is then plotted as the red 'Theory' line. Reporting that the data scatter about this line is below 0.2% demonstrates self-consistency of the fit, not independent agreement with a theoretical prediction. To support the claim of 'perfect control and high reproducibility', an independent stress measurement (e.g., cryogenic wafer-curvature measurement) or a theory curve based on independently known parameters is needed.
  2. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 4] The claim that the final vacuum gap at 10 mK equals the trench depth minus the bottom-electrode thickness is not directly verified. The mechanical frequency in Eq. (2) has no dependence on the gap, so the frequency data, batch statistics, and room-temperature profilometry shown here cannot constrain the absolute plate separation at cryogenic temperature. The paper should either provide a direct cryogenic gap measurement (e.g., microwave-frequency versus designed-gap calibration, capacitance measurement, or low-temperature interferometry) or explicitly state that the exact gap is an assumption inherited from the flattening model, with a quantified uncertainty budget.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 4, microwave loss paragraph] The paper claims that the platform exhibits 'low microwave loss', but the actual microwave quality-factor data are not presented here. The text states that 'in [3] we report internal quality factors up to 10^5 ...' and does not include those measurements or a direct microwave characterization. Since the title and abstract list low microwave loss as a key property, the authors should either include the relevant microwave loss data or clearly re-scope the claim as a property demonstrated in the cited companion work, not in this fabrication study.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3E, Eq. (1)] The chemical reaction equation for HF vapor etching is garbled: 'SiO2+4HF−2+4C2H5OH+2 − →SiF4+2H2O+4C2H5OH' contains stray superscripts and an unbalanced notation; please rewrite it with correct stoichiometry and formatting.
  2. [Supplementary, Fig. S2 caption] The caption contains the typo 'compareed'; it should read 'compared'.
  3. [Supplementary, Sec. 7C] The sentence 'The frequency tolerance is normally defined by the desired mutual coupling between the identical LCs winch is typically designed greater than 100 MHz' contains the typo 'winch' instead of 'which'.
  4. [Sec. 4, Fig. 11b and Fig. 13a] The reported mechanical quality factors, including the single-device Q = 4e7 value, are presented without error bars or a description of the fitting uncertainty. Please state the number of ringdown traces used, the fitting procedure, and how uncertainties in the extraction propagate to the quoted values.
  5. [Sec. 3C, Fig. 5] The inset of Fig. 5, showing the magnified final topography, lacks axis labels and units; adding them would make the 10-nm claim verifiable.
  6. [Sec. 4, Fig. 16c caption] The phrase 'theoretical fit' is imprecise. The red line is the 1/R scaling relation evaluated with sigma_Al = 350 MPa obtained from the fit in Fig. 13b, so it should be described as a fitted model, not an a priori theoretical prediction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fitted stress is explicitly labeled as a fit, and headline device-performance claims cite prior peer-reviewed companion papers.

full rationale

The manuscript's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The one place where a model curve uses a fitted value is Fig. 13b, where the text states: "To experimentally extract the value of the mechanical stress in drumheads at low temperature, we plot mechanical frequencies versus trench radius and fit the theoretically expected frequencies to extract the stress as σAl = 350(±10%) MPa" and then plots the resulting curve. This is a calibration, explicitly labeled as a fit and as "the theoretical curve with σAl = 350 MPa," not a prediction derived independently of the data. Similarly, Fig. 16c is described as "theoretical fit with 1/R scaling rule," and the reported <0.2% disorder is the measured scatter of data about that fit, i.e., an empirical residual, not a quantity forced by construction. The abstract-level performance claims (quality factor of 40 million, ground-state cooling, motion squeezing, single-photon coupling ≈15 Hz, 24-site topological lattice, quantum collective dynamics in a hexamer) are attributed to references [1-3], which are previously published, externally reviewed results by the same group; citing them is not circular because those results are not derived from the present manuscript's fitted parameters. No equation in the paper defines a predicted quantity in terms of the quantity it is supposed to establish. The cryogenic gap-size assertion (trench depth minus bottom-electrode thickness after cooldown) is a process-design claim that is not directly verified at 10 mK, but that is a completeness or verification concern, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The fabrication claim leans on material-behavior assumptions (flatness at low temperature, elastic stress, HF selectivity) that are reasonable and partially evidenced by SEM, profilometry, and yield data. The only genuine fitted constant in the main text is the low-temperature aluminum stress sigma=350 MPa; Q0 and DQ are estimates used for a consistency check, not for the main fabrication conclusion. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Aluminum drum stress at low temperature sigma_Al = 350 MPa (+/-10%)
    Fitted to measured mechanical frequency versus drum radius using Eq. (2) (Fig. 13b); reused as a 'theoretical fit' in Fig. 16c.
  • Aluminum material quality factor Q0 at 10 mK = approx 4 x 10^5
    Stated as an estimate with no measurement or citation; combined with FEM dilution factor DQ ~ 100 to reproduce the measured Qm ~ 4 x 10^7.
  • Dissipation dilution factor DQ = approx 100 (FEM estimate)
    Obtained from COMSOL simulation of the drum geometry; used in Qm = Q0 x DQ to explain the observed ultra-high Q. The result depends on model boundary conditions and material parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The drumhead mechanical mode is an ideal, fully clamped circular membrane, so the fundamental frequency follows f = (alpha_0,1/(2 pi R)) sqrt(sigma/rho) (Eq. 2).
    Used to extract stress and to compare measured frequencies with theory; ignores finite thickness, clamping compliance, and mode shape corrections that the COMSOL model partially addresses.
  • domain assumption At cryogenic temperatures the aluminum drumhead becomes flat and tensile, so the vacuum gap is set by trench depth minus bottom plate thickness.
    Central to the claimed gap control; supported indirectly by room-temperature profilometry, frequency reproducibility, and yield, not by a direct cryogenic gap measurement.
  • domain assumption Vapor HF etches SiO2 with selectivity to aluminum and does not degrade or stick the released drumheads.
    Required for the release step; supported by SEM images of released devices and stated high yield, but not by quantitative etch-rate or material-damage data in the paper.
  • domain assumption Bulk thermal expansion coefficients and Young's modulus of Al and Si apply to the thin films in the stress estimate of Eq. S1.
    The low-temperature stress sigma_Al is estimated through an integral over bulk material properties; thin-film values can differ with grain size and microstructure.
  • domain assumption The aluminum film remains in the elastic regime below the yield stress at low temperature, with yield near 1 GPa inferred from clamp cracking.
    Underpins the design rule for clamp tapering and the claim that the drum stays flat; the yield stress is inferred from post-cool-down cracking rather than measured mechanically.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Compact superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors with low microwave loss and high mechanical coherence for scalable quantum circuits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GOSCBEME

@misc{pith2026250103211,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Compact superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors with low microwave loss and high mechanical coherence for scalable quantum circuits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GOSCBEME}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03211}
}
abstract

Vacuum-gap capacitors have recently attracted significant interest in superconducting circuit platforms due to their compact design and exceptionally low dielectric losses in the microwave regime. Their intrinsic ability to support mechanical vibrational modes makes them well-suited for circuit optomechanics. However, precise control over the gap size and the realization of high-coherence mechanical modes remain longstanding challenges. Here, we present a detailed and scalable fabrication process for vacuum-gap capacitors that support ultra-high-coherence mechanical motion, exhibit low microwave loss, and occupy a significantly smaller footprint compared to conventional planar geometries. By employing a planarized $\mathrm{SiO}_2$ sacrificial layer, we achieve vacuum gaps on the order of 150 nm. Using this platform, we have recently demonstrated ground-state cooling and motion squeezing of a mechanical oscillator with a quality factor of 40 million, a 100-fold improvement compared to prior works, as well as a single-photon optomechanical coupling rate of approximately 15Hz. Additional achievements include the realization of an optomechanical topological lattice with 24 sites and the observation of quantum collective dynamics in a mechanical hexamer. Collectively, these results underscore the potential of vacuum-gap capacitors as a platform for coupling superconducting qubits to mechanical systems, enabling quantum storage, and probing gravitational effects in quantum mechanics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03211 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b, we provide a SEM micrograph of the top elec￾trode of the vacuum gap capacitor. Furthermore, Fig. 1c illustrates the performance of our fabrication method compared to other approaches reported in the literature, excluding metalized membranes that feature very large footprint [40, 41] (see supplementary information). Fi￾nally, we demonstrate the application of this device in a circuit optomechanical platform, achie… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Chegnizadeh, M

    M. Chegnizadeh, M. Scigliuzzo, A. Youssefi, S. Kono, E. Guzovskii, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum collec- tive motion of macroscopic mechanical oscillators, Sci- ence 386, 1383 (2024)

    2024

  2. [1]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, M. Chegnizadeh, and T. J. Kippen- berg, A squeezed mechanical oscillator with millisecond quantum decoherence, Nature Physics , 1 (2023)

    2023

  3. [2]

    Youssefi, S

    A. Youssefi, S. Kono, A. Bancora, M. Chegnizadeh, J. Pan, T. Vovk, and T. J. Kippenberg, Topological lat- tices realized in superconducting circuit optomechanics, Nature 612, 666 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    W. D. Phillips, Nobel lecture: Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 721 (1998)

    1998

  5. [5]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Reviews of Modern Physics 75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, et al., Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature 464, 697 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017). 13

    2017

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, M. Castellanos-Beltran, J. W. Harlow, and K. W. Lehnert, Nanomechanical motion measured with an imprecision below that at the standard quantum limit, Nature nanotechnology 4, 820 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of micromechani- cal motion to the quantum ground state, Nature475, 359 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    J. Chan, T. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state, Nature 478, 89 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Palomaki, J

    T. Palomaki, J. Teufel, R. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehn- ert, Entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields, Science 342, 710 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Barzanjeh, E

    S. Barzanjeh, E. Redchenko, M. Peruzzo, M. Wulf, D. Lewis, G. Arnold, and J. M. Fink, Stationary en- tangled radiation from micromechanical motion, Nature 570, 480 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Ockeloen-Korppi, E

    C. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. Clerk, et al., Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature 556, 478 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Kotler, G

    S. Kotler, G. A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, F. Lecocq, K. Ci- cak, A. Kwiatkowski, S. Geller, S. Glancy, E. Knill, R. W. Simmonds, et al., Direct observation of determin- istic macroscopic entanglement, Science 372, 622 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Weinstein, C

    A. Weinstein, C. Lei, E. Wollman, J. Suh, A. Metelmann, A. Clerk, and K. Schwab, Observation and interpretation of motional sideband asymmetry in a quantum electrome- chanical device, Physical Review X 4, 041003 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Hertzberg, T

    J. Hertzberg, T. Rocheleau, T. Ndukum, M. Savva, A. A. Clerk, and K. Schwab, Back-action-evading mea- surements of nanomechanical motion, Nature Physics 6, 213 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Shomroni, L

    I. Shomroni, L. Qiu, D. Malz, A. Nunnenkamp, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optical backaction-evading measurement of a mechanical oscillator, Nature communications 10, 2086 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    T. P. Purdy, P.-L. Yu, R. Peterson, N. Kampel, and C. Regal, Strong optomechanical squeezing of light, Phys- ical Review X 3, 031012 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Verhagen, S

    E. Verhagen, S. Del´ eglise, S. Weis, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum-coherent coupling of a mechani- cal oscillator to an optical cavity mode, Nature 482, 63 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    D. J. Wilson, V. Sudhir, N. Piro, R. Schilling, A. Ghadimi, and T. J. Kippenberg, Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoher- ence rate, Nature 524, 325 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P. Purdy, K. Ci- cak, R. W. Simmonds, et al., Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical light, Nature Physics 10, 321 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Delaney, M

    R. Delaney, M. Urmey, S. Mittal, B. Brubaker, J. Kindem, P. Burns, C. Regal, and K. Lehn- ert, Superconducting-qubit readout via low-backaction electro-optic transduction, Nature 606, 489 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Massel, T

    F. Massel, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, S.-U. Cho, H. Saloniemi, P. J. Hakonen, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Mi- crowave amplification with nanomechanical resonators, Nature 480, 351 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Rocheleau, T

    T. Rocheleau, T. Ndukum, C. Macklin, J. Hertzberg, A. Clerk, and K. Schwab, Preparation and detection of a mechanical resonator near the ground state of motion, Nature 463, 72 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Cicak, D

    K. Cicak, D. Li, J. A. Strong, M. S. Allman, F. Altomare, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, J. D. Teufel, and R. W. Sim- monds, Low-loss superconducting resonant circuits us- ing vacuum-gap-based microwave components, Applied Physics Letters 96, 093502 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    J. B. Clark, F. Lecocq, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Sideband cooling beyond the quantum backaction limit with squeezed light, Nature 541, 191 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    E. E. Wollman, C. Lei, A. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kron- wald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. Schwab, Quan- tum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator, Sci- ence 349, 952 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Pirkkalainen, E

    J.-M. Pirkkalainen, E. Damsk¨ agg, M. Brandt, F. Mas- sel, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Squeezing of quantum noise of motion in a micromechanical resonator, Physical Review Letters 115, 243601 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    Lecocq, J

    F. Lecocq, J. B. Clark, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Quantum nondemolition measurement of a nonclassical state of a massive object, Physical Re- view X 5, 041037 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Mercier de L´ epinay, C

    L. Mercier de L´ epinay, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum mechanics–free subsystem with mechanical oscillators, Science 372, 625 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    A. Reed, K. Mayer, J. Teufel, L. Burkhart, W. Pfaff, M. Reagor, L. Sletten, X. Ma, R. Schoelkopf, E. Knill, et al., Faithful conversion of propagating quantum infor- mation to mechanical motion, Nature Physics 13, 1163 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    Palomaki, J

    T. Palomaki, J. Harlow, J. Teufel, R. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehnert, Coherent state transfer between itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscillator, Nature495, 210 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    N. R. Bernier, L. D. T´ oth, A. Koottandavida, M. A. Ioannou, D. Malz, et al., Nonreciprocal reconfigurable microwave optomechanical circuit, Nature Communica- tions 8, 10.1038/s41467-017-00447-1 (2017)

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    L. M. de L´ epinay, E. Damsk¨ agg, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Realization of directional amplifi- cation in a microwave optomechanical device, Physical Review Applied 11, 034027 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Barzanjeh, M

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Wulf, M. Peruzzo, M. Kalaee, P. Di- eterle, O. Painter, and J. M. Fink, Mechanical on- chip microwave circulator, Nature communications 8, 1 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    J. D. Teufel, D. Li, M. Allman, K. Cicak, A. Sirois, J. Whittaker, and R. Simmonds, Circuit cavity elec- tromechanics in the strong-coupling regime, Nature 471, 204 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    J. Suh, A. Weinstein, C. Lei, E. Wollman, S. Steinke, P. Meystre, A. A. Clerk, and K. Schwab, Mechanically detecting and avoiding the quantum fluctuations of a mi- crowave field, Science 344, 1262 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    L. D. Toth, N. R. Bernier, A. Nunnenkamp, A. Feofanov, and T. Kippenberg, A dissipative quantum reservoir for microwave light using a mechanical oscillator, Nature Physics 13, 787 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    Y. Liu, H. Sun, Q. Liu, H. Wu, M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, and T. Li, Degeneracy-breaking and long-lived multimode microwave electromechanical systems enabled by cubic silicon-carbide membrane crystals, Nature Communica- 14 tions 16, 1207 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Y. Seis, T. Capelle, E. Langman, S. Saarinen, E. Planz, and A. Schliesser, Ground state cooling of an ultracoher- ent electromechanical system, Nature communications 13, 1 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    L. D. T´ oth,Dissipation as a resource in circuit quantum electromechanics, Tech. Rep. (EPFL, 2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    M. J. Bereyhi, A. Beccari, S. A. Fedorov, A. H. Ghadimi, R. Schilling, D. J. Wilson, N. J. Engelsen, and T. J. Kip- penberg, Clamp-tapering increases the quality factor of stressed nanobeams, Nano letters 19, 2329 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    J. J. Burnett, A. Bengtsson, M. Scigliuzzo, D. Niepce, M. Kudra, P. Delsing, and J. Bylander, Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits, npj Quantum Information 5, 54 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Gordon, C

    R. Gordon, C. E. Murray, C. Kurter, M. Sandberg, S. Hall, K. Balakrishnan, R. Shelby, B. Wacaser, A. Sta- bile, J. Sleight, et al., Environmental radiation impact on lifetimes and quasiparticle tunneling rates of fixed- frequency transmon qubits, Applied Physics Letters 120 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    S. Kono, J. Pan, M. Chegnizadeh, X. Wang, A. Youssefi, M. Scigliuzzo, and T. J. Kippenberg, Mechanically in- duced correlated errors on superconducting qubits with relaxation times exceeding 0.4 ms, Nature Communica- tions 15, 3950 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    A. P. Place, L. V. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, S. Sussman, et al., New material plat- form for superconducting transmon qubits with coher- ence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds, Nature communi- cations 12...

    2021

  40. [48]

    K. D. Crowley, R. A. McLellan, A. Dutta, N. Shumiya, A. P. Place, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, T. Madhavan, M. P. Bland, R. Chang, et al., Disentangling losses in tantalum superconducting circuits, Physical Review X 13, 041005 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    C. E. Murray, Material matters in superconducting qubits, Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 146, 100646 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    S. Weis, R. Rivi` ere, S. Del´ eglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arcizet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically induced transparency, Science 330, 1520 (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, et al., A near–quantum-limited joseph- son traveling-wave parametric amplifier, Science350, 307 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    Boussaha, S

    F. Boussaha, S. Beldi, A. Monfardini, J. Hu, M. Calvo, C. Chaumont, F. L´ evy-Bertrand, T. Vacelet, A. Traini, J. Firminy, et al., Development of tin vacuum-gap capaci- tor lumped-element kinetic inductance detectors, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 199, 994 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Zemlicka, E

    M. Zemlicka, E. Redchenko, M. Peruzzo, F. Hassani, A. Trioni, S. Barzanjeh, and J. M. Fink, Compact vacuum-gap transmon qubits: Selective and sensitive probes for superconductor surface losses, Physical Re- view Applied 20, 044054 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Fedorov, Mechanical resonators with high dissipation dilution in precision and quantum measurements, Tech

    S. Fedorov, Mechanical resonators with high dissipation dilution in precision and quantum measurements, Tech. Rep. (EPFL, 2020)

    2020

  47. [55]

    S. A. Fedorov, N. J. Engelsen, A. H. Ghadimi, M. J. Bereyhi, R. Schilling, D. J. Wilson, and T. J. Kippenberg, Generalized dissipation dilution in strained mechanical resonators, Physical Review B 99, 054107 (2019)

    2019

  48. [56]

    Heinrich, M

    G. Heinrich, M. Ludwig, J. Qian, B. Kubala, and F. Mar- quardt, Collective dynamics in optomechanical arrays, Physical review letters 107, 043603 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Xuereb, C

    A. Xuereb, C. Genes, and A. Dantan, Strong coupling and long-range collective interactions in optomechanical arrays, Physical review letters 109, 223601 (2012)

    2012

  50. [58]

    Ludwig and F

    M. Ludwig and F. Marquardt, Quantum many-body dy- namics in optomechanical arrays, Physical review letters 111, 073603 (2013)

    2013

  51. [59]

    Raeisi and F

    S. Raeisi and F. Marquardt, Quench dynamics in one- dimensional optomechanical arrays, Physical Review A 101, 023814 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Peano, C

    V. Peano, C. Brendel, M. Schmidt, and F. Marquardt, Topological phases of sound and light, Physical Review X 5, 031011 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Zangeneh-Nejad and R

    F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, Topological optome- chanically induced transparency, Optics Letters 45, 5966 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi, A short course on topological insulators, Lecture notes in physics 919, 997 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, et al., Topological photonics, Reviews of Modern Physics 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    Jouanny, S

    V. Jouanny, S. Frasca, V. J. Weibel, L. Peyruchat, M. Scigliuzzo, F. Oppliger, F. De Palma, D. Sbrog- gio, G. Beaulieu, O. Zilberberg, et al., Band engineer- ing and study of disorder using topology in compact high kinetic inductance cavity arrays, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18...

    2024

  57. [65]

    Osman, J

    A. Osman, J. Fern´ andez-Pend´ as, C. Warren, S. Kosen, M. Scigliuzzo, A. Frisk Kockum, G. Tancredi, A. Fa- davi Roudsari, and J. Bylander, Mitigation of frequency collisions in superconducting quantum processors, Phys- ical Review Research 5, 043001 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    B.-B. Li, L. Ou, Y. Lei, and Y.-C. Liu, Cavity optome- chanical sensing, Nanophotonics 10, 2799 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    M. F. Gely and G. A. Steele, Phonon-number resolution of voltage-biased mechanical oscillators with weakly an- harmonic superconducting circuits, Physical Review A 104, 053509 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    Wallucks, I

    A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, B. Hensen, R. Stockill, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, A quantum memory at telecom wave- lengths, Nature Physics 16, 772 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Pechal, P

    M. Pechal, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, and A. H. Safavi- Naeini, Superconducting circuit quantum computing with nanomechanical resonators as storage, Quantum Science and Technology 4, 015006 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    Y. Liu, J. Mummery, J. Zhou, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Grav- itational forces between nonclassical mechanical oscilla- tors, Physical Review Applied 15, 034004 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    M. F. Gely and G. A. Steele, Superconducting electro- mechanics to test di´ osi–penrose effects of general relativ- ity in massive superpositions, A VS Quantum Science 3, 035601 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    Marinkovi´ c, A

    I. Marinkovi´ c, A. Wallucks, R. Riedinger, S. Hong, M. Aspelmeyer, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Optomechanical bell test, Physical review letters 121, 220404 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    S. Hong, R. Riedinger, I. Marinkovi´ c, A. Wallucks, S. G. Hofer, R. A. Norte, M. Aspelmeyer, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Hanbury brown and twiss interferometry of single phonons from an optomechanical resonator, Science 358, 203 (2017). 15

    2017

  66. [74]

    Fiaschi, B

    N. Fiaschi, B. Hensen, A. Wallucks, R. Benevides, J. Li, T. P. M. Alegre, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Optomechanical quantum teleportation, Nature Photonics 15, 817 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Carney, G

    D. Carney, G. Krnjaic, D. C. Moore, C. A. Regal, G. Afek, S. Bhave, B. Brubaker, T. Corbitt, J. Cripe, N. Crisosto, et al., Mechanical quantum sensing in the search for dark matter, Quantum Science and Technol- ogy 6, 024002 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Manley, M

    J. Manley, M. D. Chowdhury, D. Grin, S. Singh, and D. J. Wilson, Searching for vector dark matter with an op- tomechanical accelerometer, Physical review letters 126, 061301 (2021)

    2021

  69. [77]

    Youssefi, M

    A. Youssefi, M. Chegnizadeh, M. Scigliuzzo, and T. J. Kippenberg, Data and codes for the article ”compact superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors with low mi- crowave loss and high mechanical coherence for scalable quantum circuits”, 10.5281/zenodo.15413211 (2025)

    2025 doi

  70. [78]

    N. R. Bernier, Multimode microwave circuit optomechan- ics as a platform to study coupled quantum harmonic os- cillators , Tech. Rep. (EPFL, 2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    D. S. Gardner and P. A. Flinn, Mechanical stress as a function of temperature for aluminum alloy films, Journal of Applied Physics 67, 1831 (1990)

    1990

  72. [80]

    T. H. Courtney, Mechanical behavior of materials(Wave- land Press, 2005)

    2005

  73. [81]

    Ekin, Experimental techniques for low-temperature measurements: cryostat design, material properties and superconductor critical-current testing (Oxford univer- sity press, 2006)

    J. Ekin, Experimental techniques for low-temperature measurements: cryostat design, material properties and superconductor critical-current testing (Oxford univer- sity press, 2006)

    2006

  74. [82]

    Richter, K

    G. Richter, K. Hillerich, D. S. Gianola, R. Monig, O. Kraft, and C. A. Volkert, Ultrahigh strength single crystalline nanowhiskers grown by physical vapor depo- sition, Nano Letters 9, 3048 (2009)

    2009

  75. [83]

    J. E. Steinwall and H. Johnson, Mechanical prop- erties of thin film aluminum fibers: Grain size ef- fects, MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) 188, https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-188-177 (1990)

    1990 doi

  76. [84]

    A. P. Read, B. J. Chapman, C. U. Lei, J. C. Curtis, S. Ganjam, L. Krayzman, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Precision measurement of the mi- crowave dielectric loss of sapphire in the quantum regime with parts-per-billion sensitivity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14334 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  77. [85]

    C. H. Jeong, D. W. Kim, K. N. Kim, and G. Y. Yeom, A study of sapphire etching characteristics using bcl3-based inductively coupled plasmas, Japanese journal of applied physics 41, 6206 (2002). 16 Supplementary Information for: Compact superconducting vacuum-gap capacitors wit...

    2002

  78. [86]

    The average frequency is around 2 MHz, however the distribution is bimodal

    Batch-to-batch reproducibility We have measured the mechanical frequencies of devices with 103 identical drum geometry fabricated on three different batches. The average frequency is around 2 MHz, however the distribution is bimodal. The total standard deviation yields at 45 k...

    2022

  79. [87]

    To achieve similar electric circuit, a dielectric suspended membrane can be metalized with a thin film of superconductor

    Suspended superconductor compared to metallized dielectric membranes We report quality factors as high as 40 million for suspended drum completely realized in superconductor materials that forms a capacitor with a second electrode. To achieve similar electric circuit, a dielec...

  80. [88]

    An example of a dose test pattern is shown in Fig

    Lithography and dose test To accurately calibrate the exposure parameters in the optical lithography we conduct a dose test. An example of a dose test pattern is shown in Fig. S3. It is worth noting that the perfect exposure dose is different when etching silicon trench or etc...

  81. [89]

    S4, the tool consists of a big rotating polishing pad, a rotating head that holds the wafer, a slurry nozzle, and a conditioning head

    Chemical mechanical polishing As shown in Fig. S4, the tool consists of a big rotating polishing pad, a rotating head that holds the wafer, a slurry nozzle, and a conditioning head. The wafer will be fixed upside-down to the head. Then the head will bring the wafer close to th...

  82. [90]

    The size of chips in our design is 9.5 mm ×6.5 mm

    Dicing Now the wafer is ready to be diced into chips for the last step, the HF release. The size of chips in our design is 9.5 mm ×6.5 mm. To dice the wafer, we first spin coat it with a thick resist (15 µm AZ ® 10XT-60) to protect the circuits from Si debris and other contami...

  83. [91]

    We need to handle chips carefully to avoid the risk of collapse due to mechanical shocks or electrostatic discharge

    Packaging After the release, the chips are ready for packaging. We need to handle chips carefully to avoid the risk of collapse due to mechanical shocks or electrostatic discharge. The electro-mechanical devices can be inspected using an optical microscope -if we have compress...

  84. [92]

    Here discuss the effect of deposition and post-deposition techniques to manipulate such parameters

    Aluminum thin films As expected, the quality, stress, and roughness of the aluminum thin film used for the top layer influences both the release step and the low-temperature mechanical quality factor of drumheads. Here discuss the effect of deposition and post-deposition techn...

  85. [93]

    Studying the disorder tolerance in such systems is crucial to understand the fabrication technique’s limits and to improve it

    Non-uniformity tolerance In many applications, we need to design arrays and lattices of coupled identical LC electro-mechanical circuits. Studying the disorder tolerance in such systems is crucial to understand the fabrication technique’s limits and to improve it. In the LC ci...

  86. [94]

    LC circuits without the galvanic connection The galvanic connection can be evaded by making two parallel plate capacitors in series (as shown in Fig. S11). In this case, the optomechanical coupling rate will be diluted proportionally to the capacitors’ participation ratio. How...

  87. [95]

    Sapphire substrate processing In the early stage of our process development, we investigated implementing the idea of etching trenches on sapphire substrate, using amorphous Si as a sacrificial layer and planarizing it with CMP and releasing the drumhead with XeF2 which is an ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.