Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Utilizing long memory and circulation patterns for stochastic forecasts of temperature extremes

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A simple stochastic model that adds long-range memory and Arctic Oscillation forcing to daily temperatures extends useful winter forecasts of extremes at Visby, Sweden, from under a week to up to 20 days.

desk verdict Promising extension, but the out-of-sample separation is contaminated: the fractional filter's five-year memory means every training winter includes test-winter information. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03267 v1 pith:KED53IDC submitted 2025-01-04 physics.ao-ph physics.data-anphysics.geo-ph

Johannes A. Kassel , Holger Kantz This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ao-phphysics.data-anphysics.geo-ph
keywords longmemoryfractionalintegrationArcticOscillationstochasticdifferentialequationtemperatureextremessubseasonal-to-seasonalpredictionBrierskillscoredetrendedfluctuationanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Long-range memory in daily temperature and the slow evolution of the Arctic Oscillation are two predictability sources that simple statistical forecasts rarely use together. This paper tries to show that both can be combined in a deliberately simple one-dimensional stochastic model, and that doing so materially extends how far ahead winter temperature extremes can be usefully predicted. Using daily maximum and minimum temperatures at Visby, Sweden, the authors infer a nonlinear Markov model for fractionally differenced anomalies, drive it with the lagged AO index, and then re-impose long memory by fractional integration. They report that binary forecasts of threshold crossing retain skill for up to 20 days lead time for daily maximum temperature and 11 days for daily minimum temperature, against 8 and 3 days for an AR(1) baseline. If the claim holds, even crude stochastic models can reach into the subseasonal range by exploiting memory and circulation, without a full numerical weather model.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a two-step fractional filtering built on the Grünwald-Letnikov fractional difference and integral operators. First, the daily temperature anomalies are fractionally differenced with $d=H-1/2$, where $H\approx 0.70$--$0.71$ is estimated by detrended fluctuation analysis, to strip the long memory and leave a short-range series that the paper argues is Markovian. That series is then fitted as a stochastic difference equation $T_{n+1}=f(T_n,y_{n-\tau})+g(T_n)\xi_{n+1}$, with a cubic drift, a quartic squared diffusion, and the lagged AO index $y_{n-\tau}$ as an exogenous input. Forecasts are generated by iterating this Markovian equation and then fractionally integrating the output with the same $d$ and a memory length of five years, which re-imposes the long-range correlations. This separation of short-range weather dynamics and long-range climate coupling is what lets the model keep nonlinearities and external forcing while reproducing the observed persistence.

What would settle it

Perform a formal test of Markovianity on the fractionally differenced winter anomalies, for instance by comparing the one-step transition density with the Chapman-Kolmogorov composition at two or three lags, or by checking whether partial autocorrelations at lags two and three are statistically nonzero. A clear rejection would mean Eq. (4) is misspecified and the forecast improvements are not reliably attributable to the proposed mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that including long memory through fractional integration, together with exogenous forcing by the Arctic Oscillation index, substantially lengthens the useful forecast horizon of one-dimensional stochastic temperature models. The authors show this for winter (DJF) daily maximum and minimum temperatures at Visby Flygplats, Sweden: forecast RMSE crosses the climatological standard deviation at 23 days lead time for daily maximum temperature with the fractional AO-driven models versus 11 days for AR(1), and at 14 days versus 6 days for daily minimum temperature. The causal analysis finds the AO influence on European winter extremes is strongest in southern Scandinavia, with lagged correlations above 0.5 at two days and still above 0.25 after two weeks. The paper interprets the improvement as coming from two complementary mechanisms: fractional memory carries information from the past climate state, while the AO index supplies information about the current large-scale circulation regime.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that, once long memory is removed by fractional differencing, the remaining daily temperature anomalies form a Markov chain, so the next day's value is determined by today's value and the lagged AO index alone with no further hidden state. If that fails, the fitted drift and diffusion are misspecified and the forecast gains attributed to long memory and AO forcing could be artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Useful stochastic forecast horizons for winter extremes can more than double by adding long memory and AO forcing: from 6 to 14 days for daily minimum temperature and from 11 to 23 days for daily maximum temperature by the RMSE criterion.
  • The AO index contributes most at short lead times, so the circulation signal acts as an initial-condition enhancement rather than a slowly growing source of skill.
  • Nonlinearity matters for threshold probabilities, not for mean forecasts: the nonlinear and linear AO-driven models have the same RMSE, but the nonlinear model is better at reproducing the skewed tail of minimum temperature that controls threshold-crossing skill.
  • The same inference recipe can be applied to any station with a long, gap-free record and any slowly varying circulation index, so the method is not tied to Visby or to the AO.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the Visby result transfers to other stations, the size of the forecast-horizon gain should track the local strength of the lagged AO correlation; testing a station in the zero-correlation region would cleanly separate the memory contribution from the AO contribution.
  • Editorial inference: the same fractional-memory-plus-index recipe could be tried with other slow drivers, such as ENSO, the stratospheric polar-vortex state, or the NAO, where the paper's own causal maps show weaker but still two-week-long correlations.
  • Editorial inference: because the nonlinear term only improves tail probabilities, the framework is naturally a candidate for forecasting rare cold extremes, and one could extend the Brier-skill analysis to tail thresholds, such as the 5th percentile, to see whether the 20-day horizon holds for genuinely rare events rather than moderate crossings.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a data-driven stochastic modeling framework that combines fractional differencing (long memory) with a nonlinear Markovian difference equation driven by the Arctic Oscillation (AO) index. Using ERA5 reanalysis and ECA&D station data, the authors first map the lagged influence of AO/NAO on European winter temperature extremes, identifying southern Scandinavia as the region of strongest coupling. They then fit one-dimensional nonlinear stochastic models to daily maximum and minimum temperature anomalies at Visby, Sweden, with the long-memory component modeled via fractional integration. Forecasts are evaluated on held-out winters using RMSE and Brier skill scores for threshold crossings, and the paper claims that fractional models driven by the AO index extend the useful forecast horizon from 8–11 days (AR(1) baseline) to up to 20 days for daily maximum temperatures.

Significance. If the out-of-sample results hold, the paper would make a useful contribution to stochastic subseasonal forecasting by showing that a relatively simple one-dimensional model with long memory and a single circulation index can extend binary forecast skill for temperature extremes well beyond a Markovian baseline. The method is transparent, the analysis uses publicly available data, and the authors provide code on Zenodo. The causal analysis of AO/NAO influence is a useful addition. However, the central quantitative claim depends on a valid out-of-sample separation, which is currently compromised by the use of the full record in the fractional filtering and Hurst exponent estimation; this needs to be resolved before the forecast improvements can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (3)] The forecast evaluation is not fully out-of-sample. The fractional differencing (Eq. 3) and the DFA-3 estimate of H are applied to the full 1950–2022 record, and the resulting fractionally differenced series is then split into training and test winters. Because Eq. (3) is a causal filter with M=5 years, each training winter's T_n is a weighted sum of raw anomalies that includes test winters occurring within the preceding 5 years (test winters are interleaved starting in 1955). The drift and diffusion coefficients in Eq. (4) are therefore estimated from predictors that contain information from the test winters, whereas the AR(1) baseline is estimated on raw training anomalies without such contamination. This can inflate the apparent skill of all fractional models relative to AR(1). The authors provide no evidence that the leakage is negligible; please re-do the evaluation with a properly causal training protocol (e.g., retrain the parameters and re-estimate H for each test winter using only data before that winter, or apply the filter only within the training period) or quantify the bias.
  2. [Section 3, after Eq. (4)] The Markovianity of the fractionally differenced temperature anomalies is a load-bearing assumption for the form of Eq. (4), but the supporting evidence is only stated in words and is not shown in the main text or the Supporting Information. The exponential ACF decay, DFA H≈0.5, the Chapman–Kolmogorov test, and the vanishing partial autocorrelations should be presented (e.g., in the SI) so that the reader can assess whether the short-range correlated series T_n is indeed memoryless. If the series is not Markovian, the inferred drift and diffusion are misspecified, and the claimed forecast improvement could be an artifact of the filtering. Please add these diagnostics and, ideally, a comparison of the fitted model's transition densities with the empirical ones.
  3. [Section 5, Figs. 3–4] The paper's central claims ('significantly improved performance', 'predictive power for up to 20 days') rest on 66% confidence intervals for the Brier skill scores and on RMSE curves plotted without any uncertainty. A 66% interval corresponds to roughly one standard error, so a BSS that is positive only at this level does not establish predictive skill at the conventional 95% confidence level. Please report 95% confidence intervals (or p-values) for BSS and RMSE differences, and state the threshold used to define 'predictive power'. The difference between the fractional models and the AR(1) baseline at long lead times is the central quantitative result and should be supported by an explicit significance test.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 and figure captions] The term 'causal analysis' overstates what is measured: lagged Pearson correlation and lagged mutual information are associative measures, not causal inferences. Please rephrase to 'lagged correlation analysis' or similar.
  2. [Section 4 and Conclusions] The forecast results are for a single station, Visby, selected for data completeness and its location in the region of maximum AO influence. The abstract and conclusions should temper the generality of the claim ('our results show the potential') or add a second station as a robustness check.
  3. [Supporting Information, Section 3] The sentence 'Here, we set the sampling interval, i.e. the finite time difference, to zero' should read 'to one', since the discrete stochastic difference equation uses Δt=1.
  4. [Whole manuscript] There are several typographical errors, e.g., 'Flugplats' for 'Flygplats' in the SI and 'N¨ othnitzer Straße' with an incorrectly rendered umlaut; please proofread the manuscript carefully.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central forecast claim is externally benchmarked on held-out winters, with only a minor self-citation of the authors' prior inference method.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: estimate Hurst exponent H by DFA, fractionally difference with Eq. (3), fit the Markovian stochastic difference equation Eq. (4) to three quarters of the fractionally differenced winter anomalies, then generate ensemble forecasts by iterating Eq. (5) and fractionally integrating with Eq. (6), scoring RMSE and Brier skill against held-out test winters and external baselines (persistence, AR(1), ARFIMA). The forecast target (threshold crossings and temperatures in test winters) is not used in estimating the drift/diffusion parameters, which are fit only to training data, and skill is measured against the climatological reference and AR(1) baseline. The Hurst exponent d=H-1/2 is estimated from the temperature record itself rather than from the forecast target, so the claimed 20-day predictive power is not forced by construction. The method is inherited from Kassel and Kantz (2022), a self-citation, but it is not used as an unverified uniqueness argument; it provides the inference procedure and is checked by the paper's own diagnostics. A possible methodological concern is that DFA/H and the M=5-year fractional filter use the full record including test winters, which can contaminate the comparison; however, this is a data-leakage/robustness issue rather than a circular reduction of the forecast claim to its inputs. Hence no circular step is exhibited; score 1 reflects the minor self-reliance on the authors' own framework.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model depends on data-estimated parameters (H, M, polynomial coefficients) and on several domain assumptions (long memory as a property, Markovianity after fractional differencing, exogeneity of AO, approximate stationarity). No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Hurst exponent H for daily temperature anomalies = 0.71 (Tmin), 0.70 (Tmax)
    Estimated by DFA-3 and used to set the fractional differencing/integration parameter d = H - 1/2 in the model and forecast.
  • Memory length M = 5 years (1825 days)
    Chosen via the short-memory error criterion in SI Section 3; controls how many past observations are used in fractional differencing/integration.
  • Polynomial drift coefficients lambda_0..lambda_4 = Estimated by least squares for each model and lag tau
    Define the deterministic drift in Eq. (4); five parameters per model, fit to training data.
  • Polynomial diffusion coefficients theta_0..theta_4 = Estimated by least squares from residuals
    Define the squared diffusion in g^2(T_n); five parameters per model, fit to training data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Long memory is a given feature of the temperature anomalies and is adequately described by a single Hurst exponent H.
    Stated in Section 1 ('we assume long memory to be a given feature of the data') and used to apply fractional differencing with d = H - 1/2.
  • domain assumption The fractionally differenced temperature anomalies form a Markov process with state (T_n, y_{n-tau}).
    Asserted in Section 3 on the basis of exponential ACF decay, DFA H approximately 0.5, a Chapman-Kolmogorov test, and partial autocorrelations vanishing after one lag; this justifies the first-order stochastic difference equation (Eq. 4).
  • domain assumption The AO index acts as an exogenous driver with unidirectional coupling to surface temperature; there is no significant feedback from Visby temperature to AO on daily time scales.
    Assumed in Section 1 ('assuming a unidirectional coupling between circulation mode and surface air temperature') and used throughout the model inference.
  • domain assumption After removing a second-order Fourier seasonal cycle, the winter temperature anomaly series are approximately stationary; the global warming trend can be ignored.
    Discussed in SI Section 2, where the trend of about 1 K/100y is deemed small relative to the 3.9 K anomaly standard deviation.
  • standard math Standard fractional calculus and ARFIMA theory (Grünwald-Letnikov derivatives, Hosking 1981) correctly connect long-memory estimation to the fractional differencing/integration filters used.
    Invoked in Section 3 and SI Section 3; these are textbook results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Utilizing long memory and circulation patterns for stochastic forecasts of temperature extremes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KED53IDC

@misc{pith2026250103267,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Utilizing long memory and circulation patterns for stochastic forecasts of temperature extremes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KED53IDC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03267}
}
read the original abstract

Long memory and circulation patterns are potential sources of subseasonal-to-seasonal predictions. Here, we infer one-dimensional nonlinear stochastic models of daily temperature which capture both long memory and external driving by the Arctic Oscillation (AO) index. To this end, we employ a data-driven method which combines fractional calculus and stochastic difference equations. A causal analysis of AO and North-Atlantic Oscillation indices and European daily extreme temperatures reveals the largest influence of the AO index on winter temperature in southern Scandinavia. Stochastic temperature forecasts for Visby Flygplats, Sweden, show significantly improved performance for long memory models. Binary temperature forecasts show predictive power for up to 20 (11) days lead time for maximum (minimum) daily temperature (66% CI) while an AR(1) model possesses predictive power for 8 (3) days lead time for daily maximum (minimum) temperature (66% CI). Our results show the potential of long memory and circulation patterns for extreme temperature forecasts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03267 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lagged mutual information (Lagged MI) and lagged Pearson correlation coefficient (Lagged PCC) of the AO index and daily maximum and minimum temperature anomalies in winter (DJF). Contour lines show elliptical shape with the maximum in southern Scandinavia. Lagged PCC remains above r > 0.3 in southern Scandinavia up to 14 days lag time. 0 10 20 30 Time lag τ [days] 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Lagged MI [nats] DJF temper… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Causal Analysis of AO and NAO index and winter daily extreme tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In general, the RMSE of the fractional models’ forecasts crosses the dotted black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Brier skill scores of binary threshold crossings for winter daily mini [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Lagged mutual information (Lagged MI) and lagged Pearson correlation coefficient (Lagged [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fractional differencing errors of daily extreme temperature anomalies recorded at Visby Flygplats, Sweden. Left panel: Normalized errors of memory selection criterion for daily minimum temperature anomalies. The L∞ error falls below 0.1 σTmin at M ≥ 512 days while the …
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Histograms and Gaussian fits of daily maximum and minimum winter (DJF) tem￾perature anomalies recorded at Visby Flygplats, Sweden. The daily maximum temperature anomalies are approximately Gaussian, while the daily minimum temperature histogram is strongly skewed, devi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    \ Livezey, R E

    Barnston1987 APACrefauthors Barnston, A G. \ Livezey, R E. APACrefauthors \ 1987 . Classification, Seasonality and Persistence of Low-Frequency Atmospheric Circulation Patterns Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns . Monthly Weather Review 115 6 1083-1126

    work page 1987

  2. [2]

    \ J \'a nosi, I M

    Bartos2005 APACrefauthors Bartos, I. \ J \'a nosi, I M. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Atmospheric response function over land: Strong asymmetries in daily temperature fluctuations Atmospheric response function over land: Strong asymmetries in daily temperature fluctuations . Geophysical Research Letters 32 23

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    \ J \'a nosi, I M

    Bartos2006 APACrefauthors Bartos, I. \ J \'a nosi, I M. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Nonlinear correlations of daily temperature records over land Nonlinear correlations of daily temperature records over land . Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 13 5 571--576

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    , Hersbach, H

    Bell2021 APACrefauthors Bell, B. , Hersbach, H. , Simmons, A. , Berrisford, P. , Dahlgren, P. , Horányi, A. Thépaut, J N. APACrefauthors \ 2021 . The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950 The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950 . Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 147 741 4186-4227

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    , Tank, A M G K

    Besselaar2015 APACrefauthors Besselaar, E J M V D. , Tank, A M G K. , Schrier, G V D. , Abass, M S. , Baddour, O. , Engelen, A F V. Verver, G. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE ASSESSMENT & DATASET: CLIMATE SERVICES ACROSS BORDERS International climate assessment & dataset: Climate services across borders . Bulletin of the American Meteorologi...

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    APACrefauthors \ 1950

    Brier1950 APACrefauthors Brier, G W. APACrefauthors \ 1950 . Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability . Monthly weather review 78 1 1--3

    work page 1950

  7. [7]

    , White, C J

    Domeisen2022 APACrefauthors Domeisen, D I V. , White, C J. , Afargan-Gerstman, H. , Ángel G. Muñoz , Janiga, M A. , Vitart, F. Tian, D. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Advances in the Subseasonal Prediction of Extreme Events: Relevant Case Studies across the Globe Advances in the subseasonal prediction of extreme events: Relevant case studies across the globe . B...

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    , Heitzig, J

    Donges2015 APACrefauthors Donges, J F. , Heitzig, J. , Beronov, B. , Wiedermann, M. , Runge, J. , Feng, Q Y. Kurths, J. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Unified functional network and nonlinear time series analysis for complex systems science: The pyunicorn package Unified functional network and nonlinear time series analysis for complex systems science: The pyuni...

    work page 2015

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    , Koscielny-Bunde, E

    Eichner2003 APACrefauthors Eichner, J F. , Koscielny-Bunde, E. , Bunde, A. , Havlin, S. \ Schellnhuber, H J. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Power-law persistence and trends in the atmosphere: A detailed study of long temperature records Power-law persistence and trends in the atmosph...

    2003

  2. [10]

    \ Blender, R

    Fraedrich2003 APACrefauthors Fraedrich, K. \ Blender, R. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Scaling of Atmosphere and Ocean Temperature Correlations in Observations and Climate Models Scaling of atmosphere and ocean temperature correlations in observations and climate models . P hysical ...

    2003

  3. [11]

    , Barbosa, S

    Franzke2020 APACrefauthors Franzke, C L E. , Barbosa, S. , Blender, R. , Fredriksen, H B. , Laepple, T. , Lambert, F. Yuan, N. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The Structure of Climate Variability Across Scales The structure of climate variability across scales . Reviews of Geophysics ...

    2020

  4. [12]

    , O'Kane, T J

    Franzke2015a APACrefauthors Franzke, C L E. , O'Kane, T J. , Berner, J. , Williams, P D. \ Lucarini, V. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . Stochastic climate theory and modeling Stochastic climate theory and modeling . Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 6 1 63--78

    2015

  5. [13]

    \ Rypdal, M

    Fredriksen2017 APACrefauthors Fredriksen, H B. \ Rypdal, M. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Long-Range Persistence in Global Surface Temperatures Explained by Linear Multibox Energy Balance Models Long-range persistence in global surface temperatures explained by linear multibox energ...

    2017

  6. [14]

    \ Joyeux, R

    Granger1980 APACrefauthors Granger, C W J. \ Joyeux, R. APACrefauthors \ 1980 . An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing . Journal of Time Series Analysis 1 1 15-29

    1980

  7. [15]

    , Gramacy, R

    Graves2017 APACrefauthors Graves, T. , Gramacy, R. , Watkins, N. \ Franzke, C. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . A Brief History of Long Memory: H urst, M andelbrot and the Road to ARFIMA , 1951–1980 A brief history of long memory: H urst, M andelbrot and the road to ARFIMA , 1951–1980 ...

    2017

  8. [16]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    Gray2011 APACrefauthors Gray, R. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Entropy and Information Theory Entropy and information theory \ ( S econd \ ). New York Springer New York

    2011

  9. [17]

    APACrefauthors \ 1976

    Hasselmann1976 APACrefauthors Hasselmann, K. APACrefauthors \ 1976 . Stochastic climate models part I. T heory Stochastic climate models part i. T heory . Tellus 28 6 473--485

    1976

  10. [18]

    , Bell, B

    Hersbach2020 APACrefauthors Hersbach, H. , Bell, B. , Berrisford, P. , Hirahara, S. , Horányi, A. , Muñoz-Sabater, J. Thépaut, J N. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . The ERA5 global reanalysis The ERA5 global reanalysis . Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 146 730 1999-2049

    2020

  11. [19]

    , Kiyono, K

    Hoell2019 APACrefauthors H\"oll, M. , Kiyono, K. \ Kantz, H. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Theoretical foundation of detrending methods for fluctuation analysis such as detrended fluctuation analysis and detrending moving average Theoretical foundation of detrending methods for fluc...

    2019

  12. [20]

    APACrefauthors \ 1981

    Hosking1981 APACrefauthors Hosking, J R M. APACrefauthors \ 1981 . Fractional differencing Fractional differencing . Biometrika 68 1 165-176

    1981

  13. [21]

    APACrefauthors \ 1984

    Hosking1984 APACrefauthors Hosking, J R M. APACrefauthors \ 1984 . Modeling persistence in hydrological time series using fractional differencing Modeling persistence in hydrological time series using fractional differencing . Water Resources Research 20 12 1898--1908

    1984

  14. [22]

    APACrefauthors \ 1996

    Hurrell1996 APACrefauthors Hurrell, J W. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on Northern Hemisphere temperature Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on northern hemisphere temperature . Geop...

    1996

  15. [23]

    , Kushnir, Y

    Hurrell2003 APACrefauthors Hurrell, J W. , Kushnir, Y. , Ottersen, G. \ Visbeck, M. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact The north atlantic oscillation: Climatic significance and environmental impact . Washingto...

    2003

  16. [24]

    APACrefauthors \ 1951

    Hurst1951 APACrefauthors Hurst, H E. APACrefauthors \ 1951 . Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs . Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 116 770–799

    1951

  17. [25]

    APACrefauthors \ 2025

    zenodo APACrefauthors Kassel, J A. APACrefauthors \ 2025 . Utilizing long memory and circulation patterns for stochastic forecasts of temperature extremes Utilizing long memory and circulation patterns for stochastic forecasts of temperature extremes \ [software]. Zenodo . APA...

    2025

  18. [26]

    \ Kantz, H

    Kassel2022 APACrefauthors Kassel, J A. \ Kantz, H. APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Statistical inference of one-dimensional persistent nonlinear time series and application to predictions Statistical inference of one-dimensional persistent nonlinear time series and application to pred...

    2022

  19. [27]

    , Bartos, I

    Kiraly2006 APACrefauthors Kir \'a ly, A. , Bartos, I. \ J \'a nosi, I M. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Correlation properties of daily temperature anomalies over land Correlation properties of daily temperature anomalies over land . Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 58 ...

    2006

  20. [28]

    , Wijngaard, J B

    ECAD APACrefauthors Klein Tank, A M G. , Wijngaard, J B. , Können, G P. , Böhm, R. , Demarée, G. , Gocheva, A. Petrovic, P. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Daily dataset of 20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment Daily dataset ...

    2002

  21. [29]

    , Lee, J

    Ko2008 APACrefauthors Ko, K. , Lee, J. \ Lund, R. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Confidence intervals for long memory regressions Confidence intervals for long memory regressions . Statistics & Probability Letters 78 13 1894-1902

    2008

  22. [30]

    , Bunde, A

    Koscielny-Bunde1996 APACrefauthors Koscielny-Bunde, E. , Bunde, A. , Havlin, S. \ Goldreich, Y. APACrefauthors \ 1996 . Analysis of daily temperature fluctuations Analysis of daily temperature fluctuations . Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 231 4 393--396

    1996

  23. [31]

    , St\"ogbauer, H

    Kraskov2004 APACrefauthors Kraskov, A. , St\"ogbauer, H. \ Grassberger, P. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Estimating mutual information Estimating mutual information . P hysical R eview E 69 6 066138

    2004

  24. [32]

    \ Bunde, A

    Lennartz2009 APACrefauthors Lennartz, S. \ Bunde, A. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Trend evaluation in records with long-term memory: Application to global warming Trend evaluation in records with long-term memory: Application to global warming . Geophysical Research Letters 36 16

    2009

  25. [33]

    \ Bunde, A

    Lennartz2011 APACrefauthors Lennartz, S. \ Bunde, A. APACrefauthors \ 2011 Aug . Distribution of natural trends in long-term correlated records: A scaling approach Distribution of natural trends in long-term correlated records: A scaling approach . Phys. Rev. E 84 021129

    2011

  26. [34]

    \ Van Ness, J W

    Mandelbrot1968 APACrefauthors Mandelbrot, B B. \ Van Ness, J W. APACrefauthors \ 1968 . Fractional B rownian Motions, Fractional Noises and Applications Fractional B rownian motions, fractional noises and applications . SIAM Review 10 4 422-437

    1968

  27. [35]

    \ Wallis, J R

    Mandelbrot1968noah APACrefauthors Mandelbrot, B B. \ Wallis, J R. APACrefauthors \ 1968 . Noah, J oseph, and operational hydrology Noah, J oseph, and operational hydrology . Water Resources Research 4 5 909--918

    1968

  28. [36]

    APACrefauthors \ 2011

    Mann2011 APACrefauthors Mann, M E. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . On long range dependence in global surface temperature series On long range dependence in global surface temperature series . Climatic Change 107 3 267--276

    2011

  29. [37]

    , Rust, H W

    Maraun2004 APACrefauthors Maraun, D. , Rust, H W. \ Timmer, J. APACrefauthors \ 2004 . Tempting long-memory -- on the interpretation of DFA s results Tempting long-memory -- on the interpretation of DFA s results . Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics 11 4 495--503

    2004

  30. [38]

    APACrefauthors \ 2022

    CPC2022 APACrefauthors National Weather Service -- Climate Prediction Center . APACrefauthors \ 2022 . Daily Time Series of Global Circulation Indices Daily time series of global circulation indices \ [dataset]. NOAA . APACrefURL https://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/cwlinks/ APACrefURL

    2022

  31. [39]

    , Yuan, N

    Nian2020 APACrefauthors Nian, D. , Yuan, N. , Ying, K. , Liu, G. , Fu, Z. , Qi, Y. \ Franzke, C L E. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Identifying the sources of seasonal predictability based on climate memory analysis and variance decomposition Identifying the sources of seasonal predi...

    2020

  32. [40]

    APACrefauthors \ 2019

    Palmer2019 APACrefauthors Palmer, T N. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Stochastic weather and climate models Stochastic weather and climate models . Nature Reviews Physics 1 7 463--471

    2019

  33. [41]

    , Buldyrev, S V

    Peng1994 APACrefauthors Peng, C K. , Buldyrev, S V. , Havlin, S. , Simons, M. , Stanley, H E. \ Goldberger, A L. APACrefauthors \ 1994 . Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides . P hysical R eview E 49 1685--1689

    1994

  34. [42]

    , H\"oll, M

    Phillips2023 APACrefauthors Phillips, E T. , H\"oll, M. , Kantz, H. \ Zhou, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2023 Sep . Trend analysis in the presence of short- and long-range correlations with application to regional warming Trend analysis in the presence of short- and long-range correlat...

    2023

  35. [43]

    APACrefauthors \ 1999

    Podlubny1998 APACrefauthors Podlubny, I. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications Fractional differential equations: An i...

    1999

  36. [44]

    , Esteban-Parra, M

    Pozo2001 APACrefauthors Pozo-V \'a zquez, D. , Esteban-Parra, M. , Rodrigo, F. \ Castro-D \' ez, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . A study of NAO variability and its possible non-linear influences on E uropean surface temperature. A study of NAO variability and its possible non-linea...

    2001

  37. [45]

    , Bunde, A

    Rybski2006 APACrefauthors Rybski, D. , Bunde, A. , Havlin, S. \ von Storch, H. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Long-term persistence in climate and the detection problem Long-term persistence in climate and the detection problem . Geophysical Research Letters 33 6

    2006

  38. [46]

    , Bunde, A

    Rybski2008 APACrefauthors Rybski, D. , Bunde, A. \ von Storch, H. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Long-term memory in 1000-year simulated temperature records Long-term memory in 1000-year simulated temperature records . Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 113 D2

    2008

  39. [47]

    , Folland, C K

    Scaife2008 APACrefauthors Scaife, A A. , Folland, C K. , Alexander, L V. , Moberg, A. \ Knight, J R. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . European Climate Extremes and the N orth A tlantic O scillation European climate extremes and the N orth A tlantic O scillation . Journal of Climate 21 1 72-83

    2008

  40. [48]

    , Ludescher, J

    Tamazian2015 APACrefauthors Tamazian, A. , Ludescher, J. \ Bunde, A. APACrefauthors \ 2015 Mar . Significance of trends in long-term correlated records Significance of trends in long-term correlated records . Phys. Rev. E 91 032806

    2015

  41. [49]

    \ Wallace, J M

    Thompson2001 APACrefauthors Thompson, D W J. \ Wallace, J M. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Regional Climate Impacts of the Northern Hemisphere Annular Mode Regional climate impacts of the northern hemisphere annular mode . Science 293 5527 85-89

    2001

  42. [50]

    , Dee, D

    Thepaut2018 APACrefauthors Thépaut, J N. , Dee, D. , Engelen, R. \ Pinty, B. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . The C opernicus Programme and its Climate Change Service The C opernicus programme and its climate change service . IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote ...

    2018

  43. [51]

    , Carlsen, H

    White2017 APACrefauthors White, C J. , Carlsen, H. , Robertson, A W. , Klein, R J. , Lazo, J K. , Kumar, A. Zebiak, S E. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predicti...

    2017

  44. [52]

    APACrefauthors \ 2020

    Wilks2011 APACrefauthors Wilks, D S. APACrefauthors \ 2020 . Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences \ ( F ourth \ ). Amsterdam Oxford Cambridge, MA Elsevier

    2020

  45. [53]

    Yuan2013 APACrefauthors Yuan, N. , Fu, Z. \ Liu, S. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Long-term memory in climate variability: A new look based on fractional integral techniques Long-term memory in climate variability: A new look based on fractional integral techniques . Journal of Geop...

    2013

  46. [54]

    Yuan2014 APACrefauthors Yuan, N. , Fu, Z. \ Liu, S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Extracting climate memory using Fractional Integrated Statistical Model: A new perspective on climate prediction Extracting climate memory using fractional integrated statistical model: A new perspecti...

    2014

  47. [55]

    , Huang, Y

    Yuan2019 APACrefauthors Yuan, N. , Huang, Y. , Duan, J. , Zhu, C. , Xoplaki, E. \ Luterbacher, J. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . On climate prediction: H ow much can we expect from climate memory? On climate prediction: H ow much can we expect from climate memory? Climate Dynamics 52...

    2019

  48. [56]

    K. Ko, J. Lee, and R. Lund. Confidence intervals for long memory regressions. Statistics & Probability Letters, 78 0 (13): 0 1894--1902, 2008

    1902

  49. [57]

    Lennartz and A

    S. Lennartz and A. Bunde. Trend evaluation in records with long-term memory: Application to global warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 36 0 (16), 2009

    2009

  50. [58]

    Lennartz and A

    S. Lennartz and A. Bunde. Distribution of natural trends in long-term correlated records: A scaling approach. Phys. Rev. E, 84: 0 021129, Aug 2011

    2011

  51. [59]

    Podlubny

    I. Podlubny. Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications. Mathematics in Science and Engineering. Academic Press, San Diego, 1999

    1999

  52. [60]

    Rybski, A

    D. Rybski, A. Bunde, S. Havlin, and H. von Storch. Long-term persistence in climate and the detection problem. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 0 (6), 2006

    2006

  53. [61]

    Tamazian, J

    A. Tamazian, J. Ludescher, and A. Bunde. Significance of trends in long-term correlated records. Phys. Rev. E, 91: 0 032806, Mar 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.