Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

On the $N_\infty$-soliton asymptotics for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with linear dispersion and vanishing boundaries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An infinite-soliton ensemble of the modified Camassa–Holm equation collapses to an exact one-soliton or n-soliton state when its discrete spectra fill a quadrature domain.

desk verdict Quadrature-domain soliton shielding for mCH is real and correct, but the line-domain theorem hinges on an inequality the authors admit they cannot prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03485 v1 pith:VAT7R6TI submitted 2025-01-07 nlin.SI math-phmath.APmath.MP

Weifang Weng , Zhenya Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35P2535Q1537K4035B40
keywords modifiedCamassa-HolmequationlineardispersionN-infinitysolitonasymptoticsRiemann-HilbertproblemquadraturedomainshieldingRiemannthetafunctionsteepestdescentmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors set out to establish what happens to the N-soliton solutions of the modified Camassa–Holm equation with linear dispersion and vanishing boundary values, $m_t+(m(u^2-u_x^2)^2)_x+\kappa u_x=0$ with $m=u-u_{xx}$, when $N$ tends to infinity and the discrete spectral points uniformly fill a prescribed region of the complex plane. Their central claim is that the limiting $N_\infty$-soliton is controlled entirely by the geometry of that region. When the region is a quadrature domain of the form $\{z: |(z-s_1)^\ell-s_2|

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the modified Riemann–Hilbert problem (RH Problem 2): each discrete pole of the standard mCH RH problem is encircled by a small closed contour, and the pole residues are converted into jump matrices on those contours. The large-$N$ limit is taken by choosing norming constants proportional to the local spectral density, $c_j=|\Omega|r(z_j,z_j^*)/(N\pi)$, so that the residue sums become quadrature sums over the spectral region. Lemma 4.1 turns those sums into area integrals over $\Omega$; for quadrature domains, Lemma 4.2 uses Green's theorem to write each area integral as a boundary integral over $\partial\Omega$, and the boundary integrals are then evaluated by the residue theorem, producing exactly the jump matrices of a one-soliton or $n$-soliton RH problem. For the line domain, the modified RH problem is deformed into a model problem on the four intervals $(a,b)$, $(1/b,1/a)$, $(-b,-a)$, $(-1/a,-1/b)$; two new scalar functions are constructed — $g(z)$, solving a scalar RH problem with undetermined constants $m_1,m_2,m_3$, and $f(z)$, solving a multiplicative scalar RH problem with constants $n_1,n_2$ — and these reduce the model problem to standard form. Lens opening, Bessel local parametrices at the endpoints, and a small-norm RH problem then give the leading asymptotic behavior.

What would settle it

Fix a concrete density $r(z)$ (for instance a constant) and values $a,b$ with $1<a<b$, compute $g(z)$ from equation (5.84), and evaluate $\operatorname{Re}(2g(z)-\frac{1}{2}(z+1/z))$ at sample points on the four lens boundaries; Lemma 5.4 predicts a strict sign on each lens, so a single point with the opposite sign would refute the lens-opening step and Theorem 5.1. A complementary check is to simulate the $N$-soliton solution of (1.1) for large $N$ with discrete spectra sampled from the density on $(ia,ib)$ and compare it, for large negative $y$, with the formula (5.142)–(5.143).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is a collapse mechanism in the modified Riemann–Hilbert representation of $N$-soliton solutions of the mCH equation with linear dispersion and zero boundaries. Replacing the discrete pole residues by jump matrices on small contours around the poles, and taking the $N\to\infty$ limit with norming constants scaling as $c_j=|\Omega|r(z_j,z_j^*)/(N\pi)$, the discrete data become integrals: Riemann sums over the spectra converge to area integrals (Lemma 4.1). For quadrature domains these area integrals collapse under Green's theorem to boundary integrals (Lemma 4.2), and for $\ell=n=1$ the boundary integrals evaluate to the jump matrices of the one-soliton solution with discrete spectrum $\zeta_0=s_1+s_2$ and norming constant $c_1=s_3^2r_1(\zeta_0)$ (Proposition 4.1); for $\ell=n$ they evaluate to the jump matrices of the $n$-soliton solution with spectra $\zeta_j$ solving $(z-s_1)^n=s_2$ and norming constants $s_3^2r_1(\zeta_j)/\prod_{k\neq j}(\zeta_j-\zeta_k)$ (Proposition 4.2). For spectra on a line, the same construction leads to a model Riemann–Hilbert problem on four intervals; the paper introduces scalar functions $g(z)$ and $f(z)$ to reduce it to standard form, solves the outer parametrix with a Riemann $\theta$ function, constructs Bessel-type local parametrices at the endpoints, and obtains the $y\to-\infty$ formula in which $u(x)$ is expressed through the entries of the outer parametrix at $z=1$ plus $O(1/|y|)$, with $x(y)=y-\ln(f^2(1)e^{2yg(1)})+O(1/|y|)$. The elliptic-domain case is reduced to the line case via Lemma 6.1, which converts boundary integrals over the ellipse into line integrals over the focal segment.

Load-bearing premise

The line-region asymptotic formula rests on the sign condition in Lemma 5.4 — the real part of $2g(z)-\frac{1}{2}(z+1/z)$ is negative on the lenses around $(a,b)$ and positive on the lenses around the negative intervals — which the authors state cannot be rigorously proved and is checked only numerically; if that sign failed anywhere on the lens contours, the lens-opening step would no longer produce exponentially small errors and the $O(1/|y|)$ result would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a quadrature domain with $\ell=n=1$, the $N_\infty$-soliton is exactly the one-soliton solution with discrete spectrum $\zeta_0=s_1+s_2$ and norming constant $s_3^2r_1(\zeta_0)$, so the dense ensemble leaves no radiation.
  • For a quadrature domain with $\ell=n$, the $N_\infty$-soliton is exactly the $n$-soliton solution with discrete spectra $\zeta_j$ solving $(z-s_1)^n=s_2$ and norming constants $s_3^2r_1(\zeta_j)/\prod_{k\neq j}(\zeta_j-\zeta_k)$, a finite interacting soliton train.
  • For discrete spectra on a line segment, as $y\to-\infty$ the solution is given by the outer parametrix built from the Riemann theta function, with an $O(1/|y|)$ correction made explicit by the small-norm RH analysis.
  • For discrete spectra in an elliptic region, the limiting RH problem reduces to the line case, so the same theta-function asymptotic formula applies.
  • Taken together, the results establish soliton shielding for the mCH equation with linear dispersion: depending on the spectral region, a dense $N$-soliton gas collapses to a finite soliton state or to a theta-function modulated profile.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference beyond the paper: because the quadrature-domain collapse uses only the structure of the spectral measure and the residue-to-integral conversion, the same mechanism should apply to other members of the mCH/FORQ family and to the short-pulse limit, provided the Lax-pair symmetries are preserved.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the line-region construction suggests that the density function $\rho(z)$ controls the macroscopic profile through the scalar functions $g$ and $f$; a numerical test of the predicted $y\to-\infty$ profile against direct $N$-soliton dynamics for finite $N$ would sharpen the practical range of validity of the $O(1/|y|)$ formula.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the paper fixes $t=0$ for the line-region asymptotics; extending Theorem 5.1 to joint $(y,t)$ sectors would connect the $N_\infty$-soliton asymptotics with the known long-time asymptotics of the mCH equation.
  • Inference beyond the paper: since Lemma 5.4 is only numerical, a rigorous proof of the $g$-function sign — or a counterexample — is the natural next step and would settle the line-region result independently of the quadrature-domain claims.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the large-N limit of N-soliton solutions for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with linear dispersion and vanishing boundary conditions, using the Riemann-Hilbert representation of the N-soliton solution. The authors consider discrete spectra distributed in three types of regions: quadrature domains, line segments, and elliptic domains. For quadrature domains, they prove that the limiting modified RH problem collapses to the RH problem of a one-soliton solution when ℓ=n=1 (Proposition 4.1) and to an n-soliton solution when ℓ=n (Proposition 4.2). For the line domain, they carry out a Deift-Zhou steepest descent analysis in the limit y→−∞, obtaining an O(1/|y|) asymptotic formula in Theorem 5.1 in terms of an outer parametrix expressed by theta functions and local Bessel parametrices. For the elliptic domain, they assert equivalence to the line case. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the key sign inequalities in Lemma 5.4, which justify the lens-opening step in the line-domain analysis, cannot be rigorously proved and are only checked numerically.

Significance. If the results hold, this would be the first N∞-soliton asymptotics for the mCH equation with linear dispersion, extending the soliton-shielding phenomenon of Bertola-Grava-Orsatti from NLS to a Camassa-Holm-type equation. The quadrature-domain part is a genuine strength: Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 give transparent Riemann-sum limits and Green-theorem reductions, and Propositions 4.1 and 4.2 provide explicit limiting one- and n-soliton states. The line-domain part is technically ambitious but rests on an unproved sign estimate that the authors explicitly flag. The paper is also honest in stating what is and what is not proved, which is helpful for assessing the conditional nature of the line-domain theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. [5.1, Lemma 5.4, Eq. (5.120)] The sign inequalities Re(2g(z) - (z+1/z)/2) < 0 on O1±∪O2± and > 0 on O3±∪O4± are explicitly admitted to be unproved and are only checked numerically. These inequalities are the mechanism that makes the off-diagonal jump entries in Eq. (5.118) exponentially small as y→−∞, which in turn justifies the estimate V_E = I + O(e^{-c|y|}) in Eq. (5.139), the small-norm RH problem, and finally Theorem 5.1. Without a rigorous proof valid for all 1<a<b and all admissible r2, the line-domain asymptotic formula (5.142) is conditional. This is a load-bearing gap in a principal contribution of the paper, not a stylistic issue.
  2. [6, Eqs. (6.146)-(6.149)] The conclusion that the elliptic-domain N∞-soliton problem is 'equivalent to the case of the line region' is not demonstrated. Lemma 6.1 only rewrites the boundary integrals over ∂Ω2 as integrals over [ia1, ia2] with a weight ΔF(ζ); it does not show that the RH problem 16, whose jumps are on the small circles Γ5± and Γ6±, can be deformed or mapped to the line-domain RH problem 4 or 5 with jump matrices of the form (5.62). Since the equivalence is stated as one of the paper's four contributions, a precise deformation argument or a construction of the mapping between the two RH problems is needed.
  3. [5.2, Eq. (5.124)] The outer parametrix N^o(y;z) is imported from Ref. [42] by referring to 'RH Problem 4.2.3' and 'Theorem 4.3.1' of that reference. However, the jump conditions of RH Problem 13 contain diagonal jumps on Σ2, Σ4, Σ6 with exponential factors e^{xm_i+n_i}, which do not appear in the semiclassical NLS model treated in Ref. [42]. The applicability of the theta-function formula to this modified jump structure is not established; the authors should either provide a derivation of the outer parametrix for the present jump matrices or give a precise reference to a theorem that covers this case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] There are typographical errors in the abstract: 'Riemann-Hilbert problem,;' should be cleaned up, and the keyword 'Riemann-Hiblert problem' should be 'Riemann-Hilbert problem'.
  2. [Proposition 4.2] The formula for the norming constants in the statement of Proposition 4.2 appears to omit the denominator: the proof and the jump matrices in Eqs. (4.48)-(4.52) use c_j = s_3^2 r_1(ζ_j) / ∏_{k≠j}(ζ_j−ζ_k), while the proposition statement as printed shows the product without a denominator. Please correct the statement to match the proof.
  3. [Eqs. (5.86)-(5.88)] The equation labels (5.86) and (5.88) are duplicated in the display for m4 and m5; renumber to avoid confusion.
  4. [Section 5.1, around Eq. (5.113)] The definition r3±(z) := ±r2(z) on Σ1∪Σ3∪Σ5∪Σ7 is not fully explained; the sign convention should be tied to the side of the branch cut and to the direction of the contour so that the factorizations in Eqs. (5.114)-(5.115) are unambiguous.
  5. [Theorem 5.1] The theorem states an asymptotic formula for u(x) as y→−∞, but x and y are related by Eq. (5.143). The statement would be clearer if it specified the uniformity class of the error O(1/|y|) with respect to the parameter dependence and the relation between x and y.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity in the N∞-soliton reductions; the main caveat is the admittedly unproved Lemma 5.4 sign estimate, which is a missing proof rather than a circular step.

full rationale

The central quadrature-domain derivation is self-contained: the input data are discrete spectra z_j and norming constants c_j = |Ω1| r(z_j, z*_j)/(Nπ) (Eq. 4.34). Lemma 4.1 proves that the Riemann sums tend to area integrals; Lemma 4.2 uses the quadrature-domain geometry to convert those area integrals to boundary integrals. Propositions 4.1 and 4.2 then evaluate the boundary integrals by residues, exhibiting that the limiting RH problem 3 has exactly the jumps of the one-soliton (or n-soliton) RH problem with discrete spectra and norming constants read off from the evaluation (Eqs. 4.44–4.46 and 4.48–4.52). The final one/n-soliton parameters are outputs of those residue computations, not inputs used to choose c_j, so the claimed aggregation is not fitted into the data by construction. The line-domain analysis is a standard nonlinear steepest descent reduction: Lemma 5.1 converts the chosen c_j into integral jumps; the auxiliary functions g and f are constructed explicitly through scalar RH problems (Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3); the outer parametrix is imported from the external monograph [42], and the Bessel local parametrices plus small-norm estimate are standard. No load-bearing self-citation appears; the references [12,13,66,68,42] are external. Flagged limitation, not circularity: Lemma 5.4 (Section 5.1) states that the lens sign inequalities 'can not be rigorously shown' and are only checked numerically. This is a genuine missing proof that makes Theorem 5.1 conditional and should be addressed, but it does not make the line-domain claim equivalent to its own input; the sign of Re(2g(z) − (z + 1/z)/2) is an explicit property of the constructed g, not a restatement of the asymptotic formula. Hence the circularity score is 1, reflecting no circular reduction but a notable admitted gap.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claims rest on the choice of scattering data: the discrete spectral points and the norming constants, whose scaling determines the density. No fitted constants are hidden; the free parameters listed are the input data defining the soliton ensemble. The main external inputs are the mCH RH formulation from prior literature and the theta-function parametrix from Ref [42]. The paper also assumes the unproved sign condition in Lemma 5.4.

free parameters (4)
  • quadrature domain parameters (s1, s2, s3, ℓ, n) = s1 ∈ C+, s2 ∈ C, s3 small, ℓ,n ∈ N+
    These define the quadrature domain Ω1 = {z | |(z-s1)^ℓ - s2| < s3}; they are hand-chosen input scattering data, not fitted to output.
  • quadrature density r1(z) = analytic function on Ω1
    Appears in the norming constants c_j = |Ω1| n(z_j^*-s1^*)^{n-1} r1(z_j)/(Nπ); it is input data determining the weights of the soliton ensemble.
  • line density r(z) = real continuous non-vanishing function on (ia,ib)
    Input spectral density for the line region; determines c_j = (b-a) r(z_j)/(Nπ) and ultimately the final asymptotic formula.
  • elliptic domain geometry (a1,a2,b2) and constant r4 = a2 > a1 > 1, b2 small, r4 constant
    Input geometry for the elliptic domain; norming constants c_j = |Ω2| r4/(Nπ).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Correctness of the mCH RH problem, N-soliton formula, and Jost solution analysis from Refs [12,13,66,68].
    The paper builds directly on the RH formulation of the mCH equation established in prior literature; it does not re-derive the spectral analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper Lemma 5.4 inequalities Re(2g(z) - (z+1/z)/2) < 0 on O1,O2 and > 0 on O3,O4 hold.
    The paper explicitly states these inequalities 'can not be rigorously shown' and only checks them numerically; the steepest descent decay depends on them.
  • domain assumption The theta-function outer parametrix of Ref [42] applies to RH Problem 13.
    Eq. (5.124) is lifted from Kamvissis-McLaughlin-Miller without computing the genus, period matrix, Abel map, or constants for the specific g-function of this paper.
  • domain assumption Uniform filling of discrete spectra and convergence of Riemann sums to area/line integrals (Lemmas 4.1, 5.1).
    Standard equidistribution assumption for soliton ensembles; not proved in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the $N_\infty$-soliton asymptotics for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with linear dispersion and vanishing boundaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VAT7R6TI

@misc{pith2026250103485,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the $N_\infty$-soliton asymptotics for the modified Camassa-Holm equation with linear dispersion and vanishing boundaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VAT7R6TI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03485}
}
abstract

We explore the $N_{\infty}$-soliton asymptotics for the modified Camassa-Holm (mCH) equation with linear dispersion and boundaries vanishing at infinity: $m_t+(m(u^2-u_x^2)^2)_x+\kappa u_x=0,\quad m=u-u_{xx}$ with $\lim_{x\rightarrow \pm \infty }u(x,t)=0$. We mainly analyze the aggregation state of $N$-soliton solutions of the mCH equation expressed by the solution of the modified Riemann-Hilbert problem in the new $(y,t)$-space when the discrete spectra are located in different regions. Starting from the modified RH problem, we find that i) when the region is a quadrature domain with $\ell=n=1$, the corresponding $N_{\infty}$-soliton is the one-soliton solution which the discrete spectral point is the center of the region; ii) when the region is a quadrature domain with $\ell=n$, the corresponding $N_{\infty}$-soliton is an $n$-soliton solution; iii) when the discrete spectra lie in the line region, we provide its corresponding Riemann-Hilbert problem,; and iv) when the discrete spectra lie in an elliptic region, it is equivalent to the case of the line region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03485 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of discrete spectrum K ∪ K∗ and the parameters are s1 = 3 4 + i, s2 = 1 4 , s3 = 1 3 , m = 1. in the domain DΓ1+ bounded by Γ1+, that is, Ω1 := {z| |(z − s1) ℓ − s2| < s3}, Ω1 ⊂ D1 := {z ∈ C| 0 < argz < π 2 , |z| > 1}, (4.33) where ℓ ∈ N +, s1 ∈ C + and |s2|, s3 are sufficiently small (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of discrete spectrum for the line region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The RH problem 12 for the matrix function N(4)(y; z). Opening lenses O1, O2, O3 and O4. transformation: N (4)(x; z) =    N(3)    1 e −y(2g(z)− 1 2 (z+ 1 z )) r3(z)f 2(z) 0 1    , in the upper lens O1 ∪ O2, N(3)    1 e −y(2g(z)− 1 2 (z+ 1 z )) r3(z)f 2(z) 0 1    , in the lower lens O1 ∪ O2, N(3)    1 0 − e y(2g(z)− 1 2 (z+ 1 z ))f 2 (z) r3(z)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Regional division for the Bessel model UBes(z). takes continuous boundary values on the excluded rays and at the origin from each sector. • Jump condition: The boundary values on the jump contour γU where γU := γ± ∪ γ0 with γ± = {arg(z) = ± 2π 3 } and γ0 = {arg(z) = π}…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Bertola, T

    M. Bertola, T. Grava, G. Orsatti, Soliton shielding of th e focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 127201

    work page 2023

  2. [42]

    Kamvissis, K

    S. Kamvissis, K. D. R. McLaughlin, P. D. Miller, Semicla ssical Soliton Ensembles for the Focusing Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equationv (Princeton University Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz, P. A. Clarkson, Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scatt ering (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991)

    work page 1991

  4. [3]

    Bilman, R

    D. Bilman, R. Buckingham, Large-order asymptotics for m ultiple-pole solitons of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. J. Nonlinear Sci. 29 (2019) 2185-22 29

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Bilman, R

    D. Bilman, R. Buckingham, D. S. Wang, Far-field asymptoti cs for multiple-pole solitons in the large-order limit, J. Differ. Equ. 297 (2021) 320. 40

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Bilman, L

    D. Bilman, L. Ling, P. D. Miller, Extreme superposition: rogue waves of infinite order and the Painlev´ e- III hierarchy, Duke Math. J. 169 (2020) 671-760

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    Bilman, P

    D. Bilman, P. D. Miller, A robust inverse scattering tran sform for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 72 (2019) 1792

    work page 2019

  8. [7]

    Biondini, D

    G. Biondini, D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions at infinity and asymptotic stage of modulationalinstability, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 70 (2017) 2300-2365

    work page 2017

Show all 73 references
  1. [8]

    Borghese, R

    M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, K.T.R. McLaughlin, P. Miller, L ong-time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e, Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 35 (2018) 887-920

    2018

  2. [9]

    Boutet de Monvel, J

    A. Boutet de Monvel, J. Lenells, D. Shepelsky, Long-time asymptotics for the Degasperis-Procesi equa- tion on the half-line, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 69 (201 9) 171-230

  3. [10]

    Boutet de Monvel, J

    A. Boutet de Monvel, J. Lenells, D. Shepelsky, The focus ing NLS equation with step-like oscillating background: scenarios of long-time asymptotics, Comm. Mat h. Phys. 383 (2021) 893-952

    2021

  4. [11]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. Its, V. Kotlyarov, Long-time asy mptotics for the focusing NLS equation with time-periodic boundary condition on the half-line, Comm. M ath. Phys. 290 (2009) 479-522

    2009

  5. [12]

    Boutet de Monvel, I

    A. Boutet de Monvel, I. Karpenko, D. Shepelsky, A Rieman n-Hilbert approach to the modified Camassa- Holm equation with nonzero boundary conditions, J. Math. Ph ys. 61 (2020) 031504

    2020

  6. [13]

    Boutet de Monvel, I

    A. Boutet de Monvel, I. Karpenko, D. Shepelsky, The modi fied Camassa-Holm equation on a nonzero background: large-time asymptotics for the Cauchy problem , Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 7 (2022) 887-914; arXiv:2011.13235v1, 2020

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Shepelsky, Riemann-Hilbert app roach for the Camassa-Holm equation on the line, C. R. Math. 343 (2006) 627-632

    2006

  8. [15]

    Boutet de Monvel, D

    A. Boutet de Monvel, D. Shepelsky, Riemann-Hilbert pro blem in the inverse scattering for the Camassa- Holm equation on the line, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. 55 (200 7) 53-75

  9. [16]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. Kostenko, D. Shepelsky, and G. Te schl, Long-time asymptotics for the Camassa- Holm equation, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41 (2009) 1559-1588

    2009

  10. [17]

    Camassa, D

    R. Camassa, D. Holm, An integrable shallow water equati on with peaked solitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1661-1664

    1993

  11. [18]

    Camassa, D

    R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, J. M. Hyman, A new integrable shal low water equation, Adv. Appl. Mech. 31 (1994) 1-33

    1994

  12. [19]

    Chang, J

    X. Chang, J. Szmigielski, Lax integrability and the pea kon problem for the modified Camassa-Holm equation, Commun. Math. Phys. 358 (2018) 295-341

    2018

  13. [20]

    Charlier, J

    C. Charlier, J. Lenells, Boussinesq’s equation for wat er waves: asymptotics in sector V, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 56 (2024) DOI: 10.1137/23M1587671

    2024 doi

  14. [21]

    R. Chen, Y. Liu, C. Qu, S. Zhang, Oscillation-induced bl ow-up to the modified Camassa-Holm equation with linear dispersion, Adv. Math. 272 (2015) 225-251

    2015

  15. [22]

    Congy, G

    T. Congy, G. El, G. Roberti, Soliton gas in bidirectiona l dispersive hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 103 (2021) 042201

    2021

  16. [23]

    Deift, X

    P. Deift, X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscilla tory Riemann-Hilbert problems, Ann. Math. 137 (1993) 295-368

    1993

  17. [24]

    Dieng, K.D.T

    M. Dieng, K.D.T. McLaughlin, Dispersive asymptotics f or linear and integrable equations by the ¯∂ steepest descent method, in: Nonlinear Dispersive Partial Differential Equations and Inverse Scattering, in: Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 83, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 253-291

    2019

  18. [25]

    El, Critical density of a soliton gas, Chaos 26 (201 6) 023105

    G.A. El, Critical density of a soliton gas, Chaos 26 (201 6) 023105

  19. [26]

    G.A. El, A.M. Kamchantov, Kinetic equation for a dense s oliton gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 204101. 41

    2005

  20. [27]

    G.A. El, A.M. Kamchatnov, M.V. Pavlov, S.A. Zykov, Kine tic equation for a soliton gas and its hydro- dynamic reductions, J. Nonlinear Sci. 21 (2011) 151-191

    2011

  21. [28]

    G.A. El, A. Tovbis, Spectral theory of soliton and breat her gases for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 052207

    2020

  22. [29]

    L. D. Faddeev, L. A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons (Springer, Berlin, 1987)

    1987

  23. [30]

    Fokas, The Korteweg-de Vries equation and beyond, Acta Appl

    A.S. Fokas, The Korteweg-de Vries equation and beyond, Acta Appl. Math. 39 (1995) 295-305

    1995

  24. [31]

    Fokas, On a class of physically important integrab le equations, Physica D 87 (1995) 145-150

    A.S. Fokas, On a class of physically important integrab le equations, Physica D 87 (1995) 145-150

    1995

  25. [32]

    Fuchssteiner, Some tricks from the symmetry-toolbo x for nonlinear equations: generalizations of the Camassa-Holm equation, Physica D 95 (1996) 229-243

    B. Fuchssteiner, Some tricks from the symmetry-toolbo x for nonlinear equations: generalizations of the Camassa-Holm equation, Physica D 95 (1996) 229-243

    1996

  26. [33]

    Fuchssteiner, A

    B. Fuchssteiner, A. Fokas, Symplectic structures, the ir B¨ acklund transforms and hereditary symmetries, Physica D 4 (1981) 47-66

    1981

  27. [34]

    C. S. Gardner, J.M. Greene, M.D. Kruskal, and R.M. Miura , Method for solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation, Phys. Rev Lett. 19 (1967) 1095-1097

    1967

  28. [35]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. T. R. McLaughlin, Ri gorous asymptotics of a KdV soliton gas, Commun. Math. Phys. 384 (2021) 733-784

    2021

  29. [36]

    Girotti, T

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. T. R. McLaughlin, A. Minakov, Soliton versus the gas: Fredholm determinants, analysis, and the rapid oscillations behind the kinetic equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (2023) 3233-3299

    2023

  30. [37]

    Grunert and G

    K. Grunert and G. Teschl, Long-time asymptotics for the Korteweg-de Vries equation vianonlinear steepest descent, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 12 (2009) 287-324

    2009

  31. [38]

    Y. Hou, E. Fan, Z. Qiao, The algebro-geometric solution s for the Fokas-Olver-Rosenau-Qiao (FORQ) hierarchy, J. Geom. Phys. 117 (2017) 105-133

    2017

  32. [39]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Lenells, Asymptotics for the Sasa-Satsuma equation in terms of a modified Painlev´ e II transcendent, J. Diff. Equa. 268 (2020) 7480-7504

    2020

  33. [40]

    A. R. Its, The Riemann-Hilbert problem and integrable s ystems, Notices of the AMS, 50 (2003) 1389- 1400

    2003

  34. [41]

    Ivanov, T

    R.I. Ivanov, T. Lyons, Dark solitons of the Qiao’s hiera rchy, J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012) 123701

    2012

  35. [43]

    J. Kang, X. Liu, P. J. Olver, C. Qu, Liouville correspond ence between the modified KdV hierarchy and its dual integrable hierarchy, J. Nonlinear Sci. 26 (2016) 1 41-170

    2016

  36. [44]

    Karpenko, D

    I. Karpenko, D. Shepelsky, G. Teschl, A Riemann-Hilber t approach to the modified Camssa-Holm equa- tion with step-like boundary conditions, arXiv:2203.0530 2v1

  37. [45]

    A. B. J. Kuijlaars, K. R. McLaughlin, W. Van Assche, M. Va nlessen, The Riemann-Hilbert approach to strong asymptotics for orthogonal polynomials on [-1,1], A dv. Math. 188 (2004) 337-398

    2004

  38. [46]

    Lenells, The nonlinear steepest descent method: Asy mptotics for initial-boundary value problems, SIAM J

    J. Lenells, The nonlinear steepest descent method: Asy mptotics for initial-boundary value problems, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 48 (2016) 2076-2118

    2016

  39. [47]

    X. Liu, Y. Liu, C. Qu, Orbital stability of the train of pe akons for an integrable modified Camassa-Holm equation, Adv. Math. 255 (2014) 1-37

    2014

  40. [48]

    Matsuno, Backlund transformation and smooth multis oliton solutions for a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity, J

    Y. Matsuno, Backlund transformation and smooth multis oliton solutions for a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 0 51504

    2013

  41. [49]

    Matsuno, Smooth and singular multisoliton solution s of a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity and linear dispersion, J

    Y. Matsuno, Smooth and singular multisoliton solution s of a modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity and linear dispersion, J. Phys. A, Math. Theor. 47 (2014) 125203. 42

    2014

  42. [50]

    McLaughlin, P.D

    K.T.R. McLaughlin, P.D. Miller, The ¯∂ steepest descent method and the asymptotic behavior of poly - nomials orthogonal on the unit circle with fixed and exponent ially varying non-analytic weights, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006) 48673

    2006

  43. [51]

    McLaughlin, P.D

    K.T.R. McLaughlin, P.D. Miller, The ¯∂ steepest descent method for orthogonal polynomials on the r eal line with varying weights, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2008) 075

    2008

  44. [52]

    McLaughlin, X

    K.T.R. McLaughlin, X. Zhou (eds), Recent Developments in Integrable Systems and Riemann-Hilbert Problems (American Mathematical Society, 2003)

    2003

  45. [53]

    Novikov, S.V

    S. Novikov, S.V. Manakov, L.P. Pitaevskii, V.E. Zakhar ov, Theory of Solitons The Inverse Scattering Method (Springer New York, 1984)

    1984

  46. [54]

    Novikov, Generalizations of the Camassa-Holm type e quation, J

    V. Novikov, Generalizations of the Camassa-Holm type e quation, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 342002

    2009

  47. [55]

    P. J. Olver, P. Rosenau, Tri-Hamiltonian duality betwe en solitons and solitary-wave solutions having compact support, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 1900-1906

    1996

  48. [56]

    Qiao, A new integrable equation with cuspons and W/M- shape-peaks solitons, J

    Z. Qiao, A new integrable equation with cuspons and W/M- shape-peaks solitons, J. Math. Phys. 47 (2006) 112701

    2006

  49. [57]

    Z. Qiao, X. Li, An integrable equation with nonsmooth so litons, Theor. Math. Phys. 267 (2011) 584-589

    2011

  50. [58]

    C. Qu, X. Liu, Y. Liu, Stability of peakons for an integra ble modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity, Commun. Math. Phys. 322 (2013) 967-997

    2013

  51. [59]

    Rybalko, D

    Y. Rybalko, D. Shepelsky, Long-time asymptotics for th e integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Phys. 60 (2019) 031504

    2019

  52. [60]

    Sch¨ afer, C.E

    T. Sch¨ afer, C.E. Wayne, Propagation of ultra-short op tical pulses in cubic nonlinear media, Physica D 196 (2004) 90-105

    2004

  53. [61]

    Schiff, Zero curvature formulations of dual hierarch ies, J

    J. Schiff, Zero curvature formulations of dual hierarch ies, J. Math. Phys. 37 (1996) 1928-1938

    1996

  54. [62]

    E. G. Shurgalina, E. N. Pelinovsky, Nonlinear dynamics of a soliton gas: Modified Korteweg-de Vries equation framework, Phys. Lett. A 380 (2016) 2049-2053

    2016

  55. [63]

    Suret, A

    P. Suret, A. Tikan, F. Bonnefoy, F. Copie, G. Ducrozet, A . Gelash, G. Prabhudesai, G. Michel, A. Cazaubiel, E. Falcon, G. A. El, S. Randoux, Nonlinear spectr al synthesis of soliton gas in deep-water surface gravity waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 264101

    2020

  56. [64]

    Tovbis, S

    A. Tovbis, S. Venakides, X. Zhou, On the long-time limit of semiclassical (zero dispersionlimit) solutions of the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation: pure radi ation case, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 59 (2006) 1379-1432

    2006

  57. [65]

    Trogdon, S

    T. Trogdon, S. Olver, Riemann-Hilbert Problems, Their Numerical Solution and th e Computation of Nonlinear Special Functions (SIAM, 2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    J. Xu, E. Fan, Long-time asymptotics behavior for the in tegrable modified Camassa-Holm equation with cubic nonlinearity, arXiv:1911.12554

    1911 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems (SIAM, 2010)

    J. Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Nonintegrable Systems (SIAM, 2010)

    2010

  60. [68]

    Y. Yang, E. Fan, On the long-time asymptotics of the modi fied Camassa-Holm equation in space-time solitonic regions. Adv. Math. 402 (2022) 108340

    2022

  61. [69]

    Y. Yang, G. Li, E. Fan, On the long-time asymptotics of th e modified Camassa-Holm equation with step-like initial data, arXiv:2203.10573v3

    arXiv

  62. [70]

    Zakharov, Kinetic equation for solitons

    V.E. Zakharov, Kinetic equation for solitons. Sov. Phy s. JETP 33 (1971) 538-541

    1971

  63. [71]

    Zakharov, A.B

    V.E. Zakharov, A.B. Shabat, A scheme for integrating th e nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of the inverse scattering problem, Funkc. Anal . Prilozh. 6 (1974) 43-53

    1974

  64. [72]

    Zakharov, A.B

    V.E. Zakharov, A.B. Shabat, A scheme for integrating th e nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of the inverse scattering problem. II, Funkc. A nal. Prilozh. 13 (1979) 13-22

    1979

  65. [73]

    Zhou, The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scatt ering, SIAM J

    X. Zhou, The Riemann-Hilbert problem and inverse scatt ering, SIAM J. Math. Ana. 20 (1989) 966-986. 43

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.