Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Demonstration of Ultra-Sensitive KIDs for Future THz Space Borne Polarimeters

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A lens-antenna coupled KID at 1.5 THz achieves an integrated cross-polarization ratio of -21.5 dB, meeting the -20 dB requirement for the PRIMA polarimetric imager and removing the need for a polarization modulator.

desk verdict A careful, genuinely new measurement of KID cross-polarization at 1.5 THz, but the headline number rests on an unquantified +4 dB model correction that needs an uncertainty budget before the mission claim is fully settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03827 v2 pith:FAKEXWJY submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.IM

Stephen J. C. Yates , Alejandro Pascual Laguna , Willem Jellema , Edgar Castillo-Dominguez , Lorenza Ferrari , Bram Lap , Vignesh Murugesan , Jose R. G. Silva
show 3 more authors
David Thoen Ian Veenendaal Jochem J. A. Baselmans
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords kineticinductancedetectorsTHzpolarimetrycross-polarizationleaky-waveantennacomplexbeampatternphotomixerPRIMAnoiseequivalentpower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultra-sensitive microwave kinetic inductance detectors (KIDs) are candidates for future space-borne far-infrared polarimeters, but their polarization purity had not been measured in a realistic wide-field camera. This paper measures a lens-antenna coupled KID at 1.5 THz and finds an integrated cross-polarization ratio of $-21.5$ dB when integrated over the effective pupil corresponding to $1\,f\lambda$ spatial sampling, with a maximum of $-20$ dB. Combined with a noise equivalent power of $5\text{--}7\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$, the detector meets the roughly $-20$ dB cross-polarization level assumed for the PRIMA polarimetric imager. That supports a flight design with static single-polarization detectors at three angles and no rotating half-wave plate, simplifying the instrument. The work also extends phase- and amplitude-beam-pattern testing to 1.5 THz in a low-background cryogenic camera.

What carries the argument

The central object is the leaky lens-antenna coupled KID: a superconducting quarter-wavelength resonator whose radiation-sensitive part is a narrow aluminum CPW on a silicon-nitride membrane, fed by an ultra-wideband leaky-wave antenna behind an extended hemispherical silicon lens. The argument is carried by a quasi-homodyne complex beam-pattern measurement at 1.5 THz, where two phase-locked photomixers record amplitude and phase and a plane-wave spectrum propagates the near field to the far field, plus a hybrid simulation chain that computes the antenna feed in transmission, propagates the lens fields with Fourier optics, and simulates the CPW-fed antenna in reception to recover the CPW radiation contribution. Integrating the measured far-field over the effective pupil matching $1\,f\lambda$ sampling gives the headline $-21.5$ dB.

What would settle it

Independently measure the s- and p-polarization transmission of the actual neutral density filter and the 12.5 $\mu$m Mylar beamsplitter at 1.5 THz and 45$^\circ$ incidence; if the measured extinction ratio differs from the model by more than about 1 dB, the corrected $-21.5$ dB integrated cross-polarization would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a leaky lens-antenna coupled KID at 1.5 THz, measured in a full wide-field camera, has an integrated cross-polarization ratio of $-21.5$ dB (maximum $-20$ dB, spread $\pm0.9$ dB) over the pupil corresponding to $1\,f\lambda$ spatial sampling. Together with an NEP of $5\text{--}7\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$, this meets the cross-polarization assumed in simulations of the PRIMA polarimetric imager, so lens-antenna KIDs can serve as the detectors of a polarimeter without a polarization modulator. The residual cross-polarization is traced to re-radiation from the superconducting CPW readout line rather than the antenna, and narrowing the CPW linewidth is identified as the route to further improvement.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the $+4$ dB correction applied to the raw measured cross-polarization is correct, since if the modeled polarization-dependent transmission of the neutral density filter and beamsplitter is off by about 1 dB, the headline $-21.5$ dB could slip past the $-20$ dB mission requirement.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The PRIMA polarimetric imager can be built with lens-antenna KIDs at three fixed angles and no rotating half-wave plate, because the measured cross-polarization stays below the $-20$ dB system requirement.
  • At the measured NEP of $5\text{--}7\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{W/\sqrt{Hz}}$, these detectors are photon-noise limited at the roughly 35 aW absorbed power expected for PPI, so detector noise does not limit the polarimetric science.
  • Because cross-polarization is dominated by CPW re-radiation, reducing the CPW linewidth should improve polarization purity for the higher-frequency PPI bands.
  • The 1.5 THz phase/amplitude beam-mapping technique, with neutral density filtering, is available for characterizing other low-background arrays and can be extended up to about 4 THz.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the $+4$ dB correction is even approximate, the raw uncorrected level near $-25.5$ dB suggests the lens-antenna alone is very clean, so future design effort should concentrate on the readout line rather than the optics.
  • An independent bench measurement of the NDF and beamsplitter extinction ratios would convert the headline from a model-corrected value into a directly measured one and is the fastest way to stress-test the result.
  • The same photomixer-based complex beam mapping could become an end-to-end acceptance test for flight polarimetric arrays, measuring both phase and polarization leakage before integration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports coherent complex beam-pattern measurements at 1.5 THz of lens-antenna coupled microwave kinetic inductance detectors mounted in a wide-field camera. From vertical- and horizontal-polarization near-field scans propagated to the far field and integrated over an effective pupil corresponding to 1 f-lambda spatial sampling for the PRIMA polarimetric imager (PPI), the authors derive a mean integrated cross-polarization ratio of -21.5 dB with a maximum of -20 dB, after applying a +4 dB correction for the polarization-dependent transmission of the neutral density filter and beamsplitter. They also report NEP = 5-7e-20 W/sqrt(Hz), compare the measured beams with in-transmission and in-reception simulations, and conclude that these detectors can meet the approximate -20 dB cross-polarization requirement assumed for PPI without a polarization modulator.

Significance. If the headline polarization result is robust, this is a valuable experimental contribution: it directly tests the polarimetric performance of a realistic lens-antenna KID array in a camera-like optical system and extends complex-field beam mapping to 1.5 THz. The paper is transparent about its data reduction, reports high signal-to-noise (>55 dB), and makes a reproduction package available on Zenodo. The main weakness is that the central cross-polarization number depends on a model-based +4 dB calibration correction for which no systematic uncertainty is stated; the stated margin to the -20 dB requirement is only 1.5 dB at the mean and zero at the maximum.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV and Appendix A] The headline integrated cross-polarization values (-21.5 dB mean, -20 dB maximum) are obtained after a +4 dB correction derived from Fresnel-model calculations for the NDF (+5 dB) and beamsplitter (-1 dB), with assumptions on thickness, refractive index, material properties, and plane-wave incidence. No systematic uncertainty is assigned to this correction. Since the margin to the PPI -20 dB requirement is 1.5 dB at the mean and zero at the maximum, a ~1 dB error in the modeled NDF ratio would move the worst pixel above the requirement. Please provide a propagated uncertainty (e.g., by varying n, thickness, and incidence angle, or by calibrating the NDF and beamsplitter directly) and report the corrected integrated cross-polarization with a confidence interval.
  2. [Footnote 2 and Section V] The independent polarizer verification quoted as within 1 dB applies to the full-beam -17 dB cross-polarization ratio, not to the 1 f-lambda integrated -21.5 dB value that is the paper's headline claim. Since the integrated quantity weights the far-field over a restricted pupil, the full-beam verifier does not directly bound the uncertainty of the headline number. The authors should either perform the polarizer check for the 1 f-lambda integrated aperture or state clearly how the full-beam calibration transfers to the restricted pupil.
  3. [Section V and Ref. [42]] The in-reception simulation used to attribute the excess cross-polarization to CPW radiation is described only through an unpublished companion paper [42]. This attribution is an important part of the paper's interpretation (and motivates the proposed mitigation of reducing CPW width), but the reader cannot currently verify the simulation independently. Please summarize the in-reception simulation setup and key parameters in the present paper, or explicitly mark this part of the interpretation as provisional pending publication of [42].
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II-B] The text says the slot tapering angle 'creates the best comprise between aperture efficiency and cross-polarization level'; 'comprise' should be 'compromise'.
  2. [Section III-A, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) would be clearer if sigma_OPD and sigma_f are explicitly defined in the text; currently the sentence introducing them is grammatically incomplete.
  3. [Appendix A and Fig. 8] Please clarify the sign convention in Fig. 8: the caption says 'Extinction ratio (Ts/Tp)', but the text describes a +5 dB correction for the NDF with the co-polarization aligned to s-pol; stating whether Ts/Tp > 1 and how the plotted ratio maps to the applied correction would avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Section V, footnote 2] The phrase 'confirmed with a (small) polarizer within 1 dB' should be expanded to specify what was compared, how the polarizer test was performed, and whether the 1 dB is a repeatability, systematic, or fitting uncertainty.
  5. [Section IV and Fig. 6] The reported position dependence of the integrated cross-polarization is discussed only qualitatively; reporting an rms variation or a map of the spread would help support the histogram limits and the stated ±0.9 dB range.
  6. [References] Reference [42] is listed as 'in preparation'; if it is not available at the time of review, the authors should add a note about its status or include enough details in the present manuscript to make the comparison reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the headline cross-polarization value is a calibrated measurement, compared with rather than derived from simulations or fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimentally measured integrated cross-polarization ratio of -21.5 dB for lens-antenna coupled KIDs at 1.5 THz, obtained from phase and amplitude beam pattern measurements. The measurement chain is self-contained: quasi-optical complex beam maps are propagated to the far field, the co- and cross-polarization components are separated, a numerical rotation is applied only to remove a known alignment offset, and the far-field intensity is integrated over an effective pupil matching the 1 f-lambda sampling planned for PPI. No parameter is fitted to force the headline value. The +4 dB calibration correction for the neutral density filter and beamsplitter is derived from independent Fresnel transmission models using external material data (Naylor et al. for Mylar and HIFI flight attenuator data for the NDF), and it is applied uniformly to all data rather than adjusted to match the -20 dB requirement. The simulations, both in-transmission (CST/GRASP) and in-reception (Fourier optics plus CST), are compared with the measurements after the fact and are used to explain the residual cross-polarization, not to generate the reported number. The only fitted quantity, the ~ -5 deg derotation angle, is a standard alignment calibration and is cross-checked by independent source alignment to better than 0.1 deg. The PPI requirement of about -20 dB comes from an external simulation [5], not from this paper. Several self-citations exist, including the unpublished companion paper [42] used for the in-reception simulation, but none is load-bearing for the main measurement: [42] supports a subsidiary simulation comparison, and the headline cross-polarization result stands on the calibrated beam-pattern data. The stated weakness of the paper is the unquantified uncertainty in the +4 dB modeled correction, which is a correctness/calibration risk, not evidence of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard measurement and simulation practice for THz detectors. The load-bearing assumptions are the polarization transmission corrections for the NDF and beamsplitter, the pure-spatial-filter treatment of the optics, and the decoupling of antenna and CPW radiation. No new physical entities are introduced, and no physics parameters are fitted to force the headline result.

free parameters (1)
  • derotation angle = approximately -5 degrees
    Numerically chosen to minimize the maximum cross-polarization during beam map analysis (Section III-C). This is an alignment calibration, not a physics parameter, but it affects the reported cross-polarization level.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Mylar beamsplitter model: 12.5 micrometer thickness, n=1.72, Fresnel interference transmission.
    Appendix A uses this to compute the -1 dB beamsplitter correction; parameter values are taken from Naylor et al. [49], not measured in this setup.
  • domain assumption NDF transmission-line-matrix simulation with cryogenic metal impedance and dielectric constants from HIFI attenuator data [24].
    Appendix A uses this to compute the +5 dB NDF correction; input data come from earlier flight attenuator work, not from in-situ measurements here.
  • domain assumption Plane-wave incidence is sufficient for polarization transmission corrections over the +/-7 degree beam angle range.
    Stated explicitly in Appendix A as an approximation; angular dependence is deferred to future work.
  • domain assumption The camera optics act as a pure spatial filter of the lens-antenna far-field, so measured far-field can be compared with lens-antenna-only in-reception simulations.
    Section V uses this to justify comparing measurements with simulations that do not include the full camera optics; the alternative full in-reception calculation is described as computationally impractical.
  • domain assumption The antenna and CPW radiation problems can be decoupled because CPW re-radiation is small (1.1%).
    Section II-B treats the CPW separately from the antenna; the in-reception simulation is used to validate this decomposition, but the decomposition is assumed in the forward simulation.
  • standard math Ludwig-3 definition of cross-polarization.
    Standard antenna convention, cited as reference [16]; this defines what the reported cross-polarization means.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demonstration of Ultra-Sensitive KIDs for Future THz Space Borne Polarimeters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FAKEXWJY

@misc{pith2026250103827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demonstration of Ultra-Sensitive KIDs for Future THz Space Borne Polarimeters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FAKEXWJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03827}
}
abstract

We present measurements and simulations of the polarization purity of leaky lens-antenna coupled microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) at 1.5 THz. We find the integrated cross-polarization level to be at -21.5 dB for 1 f\#$\lambda$ spatial sampling. The measurements agree well with the theoretical description which is based on a combination of in-transmission simulation of the antenna feed, and an in-reception analysis of the antenna-KID system. Combined with the measured noise equivalent power of 5--7$\times$10$^{-20}$ W/$\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$, these detectors are excellent candidates for large scale and high performance imaging polarimetric instruments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03827 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Panel (a) shows an illustration of an KID detector from the array under test. Panel (b) depicts a cross-sectional view of the lens-antenna assembly. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of experimental setup: a) cross-section of KID thermal mechanical suspension, showing the array mounted inside a light tight box with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of data signal processing for one KID: a) time-stream (in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of co- and cross-polarized beam patterns measured (solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Position dependence (system magnification and rotation removed) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Modeled ratio of s and p-polarization transmission components for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PRIMA survey of the Virgo cluster

    astro-ph.IM 2025-09 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A future PRIMA survey of the Virgo cluster is predicted to detect hundreds of cluster galaxies and thousands of background sources in the infrared, filling the 25-80 micron gap left by Herschel.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [42]

    Pascual Laguna, in preparation

    A. Pascual Laguna, in preparation

    work page

  2. [1]

    PRIMA: science cases and requirements for the photometric and polarimetric PRIMAger far-infrared camera,

    D. Burgarellaet al., “PRIMA: science cases and requirements for the photometric and polarimetric PRIMAger far-infrared camera,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 13092, p. 130923B, Aug. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3018024

    doi:10.1117/12.3018024 2024

  3. [2]

    A kilo-pixel imaging system for future space based far-infrared observatories using microwave kinetic inductance detectors,

    J. J. A. Baselmanset al., “A kilo-pixel imaging system for future space based far-infrared observatories using microwave kinetic inductance detectors,”A&A, vol. 601, p. A89, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629653

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629653 2017

  4. [3]

    The prima mission concept,

    J. Glennet al., “The prima mission concept,”J. Astron. Telesc. Instrum. Syst., vol. In preparation, no. -, pp. –, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Prima: Primager, a far-infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,

    L. Cieslaet al., “Prima: Primager, a far-infrared hyperspectral and polarimetric instrument,”Proc. SPIE, vol. In preparation, no. -, pp. –, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [5]

    Simulation of the Far-Infrared Polarimetry Approach Envisioned for the PRIMA Mission,

    C. D. Dowell, B. S. Hensley, and M. Sauvage, “Simulation of the Far-Infrared Polarimetry Approach Envisioned for the PRIMA Mission,”arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2404.17050, Apr. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.17050 8

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.17050 2024

  7. [6]

    The EBEX Balloon-borne Experiment—Optics, Receiver, and Polarimetry,

    The EBEX Collaboration, A. M. Aboobaker et al., “The EBEX Balloon-borne Experiment—Optics, Receiver, and Polarimetry,”The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, vol. 239, no. 1, p. 7, nov

    work page

  8. [7]

    Ultra-sensitive THz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,

    J. J. A. Baselmanset al., “Ultra-sensitive THz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,”A&A, vol. 665, p. A17, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202243840

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2022

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,

    P. Day, H. LeDuc, B. Mazin, A. Vayonakis, and J. Zmuidzinas, “A broadband superconducting detector suitable for use in large arrays,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6960, pp. 817–821, OCT 23 2003. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02037

    2003 doi

  2. [9]

    UWB, Non Dispersive Radiation From the Planarly Fed Leaky Lens Antenna— Part 1: Theory and Design,

    A. Neto, “UWB, Non Dispersive Radiation From the Planarly Fed Leaky Lens Antenna— Part 1: Theory and Design,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 2238–2247, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2010.2048879

    2010

  3. [10]

    Quasi-optical slot antenna SIS mixers,

    J. Zmuidzinas and H. G. LeDuc, “Quasi-optical slot antenna SIS mixers,” IEEE Trans. on Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1797–1804, Sep 1992. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.156607

    1992 doi

  4. [11]

    Double-slot antennas on extended hemispherical and elliptical silicon dielectric lenses,

    D. F. Filipovic, S. S. Gearhart, and G. M. Rebeiz, “Double-slot antennas on extended hemispherical and elliptical silicon dielectric lenses,”IEEE Trans. on Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1738–1749, Oct

  5. [12]

    Surface Wave Control for Large Arrays of Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,

    S. J. C. Yateset al., “Surface Wave Control for Large Arrays of Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,”IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 789–799, Nov 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2017.2755500

    2017

  6. [13]

    Wideband Integrated Lens Antennas for Terahertz Deep Space Investigation,

    O. Yurduseven, “Wideband Integrated Lens Antennas for Terahertz Deep Space Investigation,” Ph.D. dissertation,

  7. [15]

    A Fourier Optics Tool to Derive the Plane Wave Spectrum of Quasi-Optical Systems [EM Programmer’s Notebook],

    H. Zhang, S. O. Dabironezare, G. Carluccio, A. Neto, and N. Llombart, “A Fourier Optics Tool to Derive the Plane Wave Spectrum of Quasi-Optical Systems [EM Programmer’s Notebook],”IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 103–116, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.o...

    2021

  8. [16]

    The definition of cross polarization,

    A. Ludwig, “The definition of cross polarization,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 116–119, 1973. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1973.1140406

    1973

  9. [17]

    Spectral analysis of the infinite slot leaky wave antenna & leaky wave antenna with multiple slots,

    D. Loncarevic, “Spectral analysis of the infinite slot leaky wave antenna & leaky wave antenna with multiple slots,” Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c85bfe62-4db7-447c-b15c-5748823b45bb

    2022

  10. [18]

    MKID Large Format Array Testbed,

    L. Ferrariet al., “MKID Large Format Array Testbed,”IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 572–580, Nov 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2018.2871365

    2018

  11. [19]

    [Online]

    QMC Instruments Ltd., School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Queens Buildings, The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, UK. [Online]. Available: www.terahertz.co.uk

  12. [20]

    Distortion of a simple gaussian beam on reflection from off-axis ellipsoidal mirrors,

    J. A. Murphy, “Distortion of a simple gaussian beam on reflection from off-axis ellipsoidal mirrors,”Int. J. Infrared and Milli. Waves, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1165–1187, Sep 1987. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01010819

    1987 doi

  13. [21]

    Antenna tolerance theory–A review,

    J. Ruze, “Antenna tolerance theory–A review,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 633–640, April 1966. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/PROC.1966.4784

    1966

  14. [22]

    Complex beam mapping and fourier optics analysis of a wide-field microwave kinetic inductance detector camera,

    S. J. C. Yateset al., “Complex beam mapping and fourier optics analysis of a wide-field microwave kinetic inductance detector camera,” J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 156–163, Apr 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-020-02352-2

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    [Online]

    Chase Research Cryogenics, Cool Works, 2 Albion Works, Savile Street, Sheffield S4 7UD, United Kingdom. [Online]. Available: www.chasecryogenics.com

  16. [24]

    Flight Attenuators for the HIFI Local Oscillator Bands,

    W. Jellemaet al., “Flight Attenuators for the HIFI Local Oscillator Bands,”Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, pp. 122–131, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.nrao.edu/meetings/isstt/papers/2008/2008122131.pdf

    2008

  17. [25]

    A low-background 3He bolometer array test facility and its use in evaluating prototype arrays for FIRST-SPIRE,

    P. Hargraveet al., “A low-background 3He bolometer array test facility and its use in evaluating prototype arrays for FIRST-SPIRE,” NIM-A, vol. 444, no. 1, pp. 427–431, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900299014163

    2000

  18. [26]

    Reflectance measurements on submillimeter absorbing coatings for HIFI,

    M. C. Diez, T. O. Klaassen, K. Smorenburg, V . Kirschner, and K. J. Wildeman, “Reflectance measurements on submillimeter absorbing coatings for HIFI,”Proc. SPIE, vol. 4013, pp. 129 – 139, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.393977

    doi

  19. [27]

    Multiplexed readout for 1000-pixel arrays of microwave kinetic inductance detectors,

    J. van Rantwijket al., “Multiplexed readout for 1000-pixel arrays of microwave kinetic inductance detectors,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1876–1883, June 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2016.2544303

    2016

  20. [28]

    Calibration scheme for large kinetic inductance detector arrays based on readout frequency response,

    L. Bisigello, S. J. C. Yates, V . Murugesan, J. J. A. Baselmans, and A. M. Baryshev, “Calibration scheme for large kinetic inductance detector arrays based on readout frequency response,”J. Low Temp. Phys., vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 161–166, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi...

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Phase and Amplitude Antenna Measurements on an SIS Mixer Fitted with a Double Slot Antenna for ALMA Band 9,

    M. Carter, A. Baryshev, R. Hesper, S. Wijnholds, W. Jellema, and T. Zijlstra, “Phase and Amplitude Antenna Measurements on an SIS Mixer Fitted with a Double Slot Antenna for ALMA Band 9,”Proc. of the 13 th ISSTT, pp. 515 –524, March 2002. [Online]. Available: http://library.nr...

    2002

  22. [30]

    Long-wave optics,

    D. Martin and J. Bowen, “Long-wave optics,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1676–1690, 1993

    1993

  23. [31]

    Angular spectrum representation of partially coherent electromagnetic fields,

    J. Tervo and J. Turunen, “Angular spectrum representation of partially coherent electromagnetic fields,”Optics Communications, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2002. [Online]. Available: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030401802016656

    2002

  24. [32]

    Applying Energy Absorption Interferometry to THz Direct Detectors Using Photomixers,

    I. Veenendaalet al., “Applying Energy Absorption Interferometry to THz Direct Detectors Using Photomixers,”IEEE Trans. on THz Sci. and Technol., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 594–604, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2023.3307568

    2023

  25. [33]

    [Online]

    TOPTICA Photonics AG, Lochhamer Schlag 19, 82166 Graefelfing (Munich), Germany. [Online]. Available: www.toptica.com

  26. [34]

    Coherent Broadband Continuous-Wave Terahertz Spectroscopy on Solid-State Samples,

    A. Roggenbucket al., “Coherent Broadband Continuous-Wave Terahertz Spectroscopy on Solid-State Samples,”New J. Phys., vol. 12, pp. 1–13, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/ 4/043017

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    [Online]

    Pure Photonics, 830 Hillview Ct #255, Milpitas, CA 95035, USA. [Online]. Available: purephotonics.com

  28. [36]

    Beam Profile Characterisation of an Optoelectronic Silicon Lens-Integrated PIN-PD Emitter between 100 GHz and 1 THz,

    J. Smith, M. Naftaly, S. Nellen, and B. Globisch, “Beam Profile Characterisation of an Optoelectronic Silicon Lens-Integrated PIN-PD Emitter between 100 GHz and 1 THz,”Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 2, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/2/465

    2021

  29. [37]

    Phd thesis, in preparation,

    B. Lap, “Phd thesis, in preparation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Kapteyn Insti- tute, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9747 AD The Netherlands

  30. [38]

    P. F. Goldsmith,Gaussian Beam Quasioptical Propagation and Appli- cations. IEEE Press, 1998

    1998

  31. [39]

    Analysis techniques for complex field radiation pattern measurements,

    K. K. Davis, W. Jellemaet al., “Analysis techniques for complex field radiation pattern measurements,”Proc. SPIE, vol. 10708, pp. 10 708 – 10 715, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2314383 [40]GRASP, TICRA, Copenhagen, Denmark, version 21.0.2. [Online]. Ava...

    2018 doi

  32. [41]

    Incoherent Detection of Orthogonal Polarizations via an Antenna Coupled MKID: Experimental Validation at 1.55 THz,

    O. Yurdusevenet al., “Incoherent Detection of Orthogonal Polarizations via an Antenna Coupled MKID: Experimental Validation at 1.55 THz,” IEEE Trans. THz Sci. Technol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 736–745, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2018.2873890

    2018

  33. [43]

    Fourier optics for the analysis of distributed absorbers under thz focusing systems,

    N. Llombart, B. Bl ´azquez, A. Freni, and A. Neto, “Fourier optics for the analysis of distributed absorbers under thz focusing systems,”IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 573–583, Jul. 2015. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/...

    2015

  34. [44]

    Reception power pattern of distributed absorbers in focal plane arrays: A fourier optics analysis,

    N. Llombart, S. O. Dabironezare, G. Carluccio, A. Freni, and A. Neto, “Reception power pattern of distributed absorbers in focal plane arrays: A fourier optics analysis,”IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propag., vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 5990–6002, Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://d...

    2018

  35. [45]

    Terahertz attenuation and dispersion characteristics of coplanar transmission lines,

    M. Frankel, S. Gupta, J. Valdmanis, and G. Mourou, “Terahertz attenuation and dispersion characteristics of coplanar transmission lines,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory and Techn., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 910– 916, Jun. 1991. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/22.81658

    1991 doi

  36. [46]

    Suppression of radiation loss in high kinetic inductance superconducting co-planar waveguides,

    S. H ¨ahnle, N. v. Marrewijk, A. Endo, K. Karatsu, D. J. Thoen, V . Murugesan, and J. J. A. Baselmans, “Suppression of radiation loss in high kinetic inductance superconducting co-planar waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 116, no. 18, p. 182601, May 2020. [Online]. Available...

    2020 doi

  37. [47]

    Reproduction package for

    S. J. C. Yateset al., “Reproduction package for ”Demonstration of Ultra-Sensitive KIDs for Future THz Space Borne Polarimeters”,” Dec

  38. [48]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics, 4th ed. Pergamon press, 1970. 9

    1970

  39. [49]

    Mylar beam-splitter efficiency in far infrared interferometers: angle of incidence and absorption effects,

    D. A. Naylor, R. T. Boreiko, and T. A. Clark, “Mylar beam-splitter efficiency in far infrared interferometers: angle of incidence and absorption effects,”Applied Optics, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1055, Apr. 1978. [Online]. Available: https://www.osapublishing.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=...

    1978

  40. [50]

    Polarization in diffractive optics and metasurfaces,

    N. A. Rubin, Z. Shi, and F. Capasso, “Polarization in diffractive optics and metasurfaces,”Adv. Opt. Photon., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 836–970, Dec

  41. [1993]

    Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.247919

    [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.247919

    doi

  42. [2016]

    Available: https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid: f30b8bca-173f-4a13-b545-e18e137c9fc6 [14]CST Studio Suite, Dassault Syst `emes, V ´elizy-Villacoublay, France, version 2020

    [Online]. Available: https://repository.tudelft.nl/record/uuid: f30b8bca-173f-4a13-b545-e18e137c9fc6 [14]CST Studio Suite, Dassault Syst `emes, V ´elizy-Villacoublay, France, version 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.3ds.com/ products-services/simulia/products/cst-studio-suite/

    2020

  43. [2018]

    Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aae434

    [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aae434

    doi

  44. [2021]

    Available: https://opg.optica.org/aop/abstract.cfm?URI= aop-13-4-836

    [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/aop/abstract.cfm?URI= aop-13-4-836

  45. [2024]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16792922

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16792922

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.