Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 74 references

ZDySS -- Zero-Shot Dynamic Scene Stylization using Gaussian Splatting

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a dynamic 3D scene, once trained as feature-augmented Gaussian splatting, can adopt arbitrary unseen style images at inference with no per-style optimization and no trained stylization network.

desk verdict Clean idea with thin evidence: the running-average normalization for zero-shot dynamic stylization is plausible, but the paper never validates its core assumption about stable feature statistics. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03875 v1 pith:UM22JJQE submitted 2025-01-07 cs.CV

Abhishek Saroha , Florian Hofherr , Mariia Gladkova , Cecilia Curreli , Or Litany , Daniel Cremers This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords zero-shotstylizationdynamicscenesGaussiansplattingadaptiveinstancenormalizationfeaturefields4Dstyletransferspatio-temporalconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces ZDySS, a zero-shot stylization framework for dynamic scenes built on Gaussian splatting. Once a dynamic scene is trained, any previously unseen style image can be applied at inference, which would make stylizing moving content in games, film, and AR/VR a one-time cost instead of a per-style optimization. The central move is to attach a learned feature vector to each 3D Gaussian, then apply AdaIN (adaptive instance normalization) directly to those per-Gaussian vectors using a training-time running average of rendered feature statistics. If correct, the method removes the two main bottlenecks of earlier dynamic-scene stylization: per-style retraining and dependence on a large dataset to train a style-transformation module. The authors report stylized novel views across multiple styles on the Plenoptic Video dataset, with quantitative consistency comparisons against S-DyRF, StyleDyRF, and two synthetic Gaussian baselines.

What carries the argument

The machinery is feature-augmented dynamic Gaussians combined with running-average AdaIN. Each Gaussian deformed by 4DGS-style hexplanes carries a learnable 512-dimensional feature vector, rendered by the Feature 3DGS renderer into a feature map that is supervised by VGG features. During training a moving average of the rendered feature map's mean and standard deviation is recorded; at inference, the per-Gaussian features are normalized by these global statistics, scaled and shifted by the style image's statistics via AdaIN, then rendered and decoded by the AdaIN decoder. The linearity of the affine map in both the normalization and the rendering is what lets the style transformation be applied per-Gaussian, avoiding per-view normalization that would break consistency.

What would settle it

Render held-out views and timestamps from a trained scene and compute the actual mean and standard deviation of each rendered feature map; if those per-image statistics deviate sharply from the training-time running average in a way that produces visible flicker, color shifts, or lost style detail over longer time gaps, the core claim fails. A concrete test would use a scene with a large moving object or changing illumination and compare ZDySS with per-image AdaIN normalization on long-range temporal consistency.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that zero-shot stylization of a dynamic scene is achieved by aligning each 3D Gaussian with a 512-dimensional feature vector supervised by VGG features, then applying the AdaIN affine transformation directly to those per-Gaussian vectors at inference using the style image's feature statistics. Because both AdaIN's affine operation and the volume rendering are linear, this per-Gaussian operation equals normalizing the rendered feature map, but the statistics used are a training-time running average of the rendered features rather than the statistics of any single view or frame. That shared normalization is what preserves spatio-temporal consistency, and the method needs neither style-specific retraining nor a pretrained style-transfer module. The paper validates this on real-world dynamic scenes from the Plenoptic Video dataset, showing stylized outputs at novel views and timestamps across diverse, unseen styles.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that the learned per-Gaussian features are stable enough across all views and timestamps that a single global set of normalization statistics from training time remains appropriate for every rendering at inference.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any style image seen for the first time can be applied to the trained scene instantly, enabling interactive style editing of dynamic content in games, film, and AR/VR.
  • Because no style-specific optimization is required, the marginal cost of adding a new style is essentially zero after the one-time scene training.
  • The shared running-average statistics keep AdaIN-based transfer consistent across the spatio-temporal domain without optical-flow or temporal regularization.
  • Style interpolation at inference between two style latent vectors works directly, indicating the feature space supports continuous style control.
  • The method avoids the blurriness and Gaussian-spiking artifacts the paper attributes to training a 4DGS scene directly on stylized images.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The running-average normalization assumes the per-Gaussian feature statistics are stationary across views and time; scenes with drastic appearance changes, such as sudden lighting shifts or moving occluders, might break that stationarity, and a per-region or per-time-statistics variant would be a natural extension.
  • The same per-Gaussian affine-editing trick is not limited to AdaIN: other linear feature transforms, such as whitening-and-coloring or linear style projections, could be applied directly to the Gaussians provided global statistics are estimated once.
  • Since style is baked into per-Gaussian features, one could precompute stylized feature vectors for several styles and switch between them without re-rendering, which would make multi-style dynamic scene delivery cheap at runtime.
  • The style space is coupled to the VGG encoder; exchanging that encoder for a foundation model could broaden the range of transferable styles, but that is beyond what the paper tests.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ZDySS, a zero-shot stylization framework for dynamic scenes built on 4D Gaussian Splatting. Each Gaussian is augmented with a 512-dimensional learned feature vector supervised by VGG features, and at inference the method applies Adaptive Instance Normalization (AdaIN) directly to these per-Gaussian feature vectors, using channel-wise mean and standard deviation from a running average of rendered feature statistics computed during training. The stylized features are then rendered and decoded by the pretrained AdaIN decoder. The claimed contributions are zero-shot operation (no per-style optimization), spatio-temporal consistency across views and timestamps, and the absence of a learned style-transfer module. Experiments are conducted on the Plenoptic Video Dataset with four style images, comparing against S-DyRF and two synthetic baselines, with consistency metrics (warped RMSE and LPIPS) and ablations on style interpolation, pretraining, and the running-average normalization.

Significance. If the central claims hold, ZDySS would be a practically useful method: after a single training pass on a dynamic scene, arbitrary unseen styles could be applied at inference without per-style optimization, with multi-view and temporal consistency. The idea of applying AdaIN to per-Gaussian features is a natural extension of static-scene StyleGaussian to dynamic scenes, and the running-average normalization is simple and computationally efficient. The paper is clearly written and the method is conceptually straightforward. However, the current validation is insufficient to establish the claimed consistency and superiority: the quantitative evaluation relies solely on consistency metrics that the authors concede favor blurry outputs, the ablation for the key running-average component shows only marginal differences, and a technical claim about the linearity equivalence between per-feature and per-map AdaIN is not exact. The novelty over concurrent work (4DStyleGaussian) appears limited to the running-average normalization, so the evidence for that component is especially important.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, Eq. (3) and Eq. (5)] The paper claims that applying AdaIN to per-Gaussian features is equivalent to applying it to the rendered feature map 'due to the linearity of the affine operation.' This is not exact. The rendered feature map is F_r = sum_i f_i alpha_i T_i, and applying the affine y = a f_i + b to each Gaussian before rendering yields a F_r + b sum_i alpha_i T_i, whereas applying the same affine to the rendered map yields a F_r + b. The factor sum_i alpha_i T_i is the accumulated opacity, which is generally less than 1 in semi-transparent and background regions, so the discrepancy b(1 - sum_i alpha_i T_i) is nonzero. This is load-bearing because the entire inference procedure and the claimed consistency advantage rest on this equivalence. Please provide a corrected derivation (e.g., accounting for opacity) or empirical evidence that the discrepancy is negligible for the tested scenes and styles.
  2. [Section 5.4, Table 2] The quantitative results do not support the abstract's claim of 'superior performance and coherence.' Only consistency metrics (warped RMSE and LPIPS) are reported, and the authors themselves note that these metrics favor blurry or smoothed outputs. On several rows, such as long-range view consistency and long-range time consistency, S-DyRF achieves lower (better) RMSE and LPIPS than ZDySS. No metrics are reported for style fidelity, content preservation, or perceptual quality, and the evaluation uses only four style images from a single dataset. To support the central claim, the authors should add appropriate evaluation (e.g., style loss, content loss, FID/KID, user study) and expand the experiments to more styles and at least one additional dynamic scene dataset.
  3. [Section 6.3, Table 3] The ablation for the running-average normalization shows only marginal differences from the naive per-frame normalization (e.g., short-range view consistency RMSE 4.82 vs 4.87 and LPIPS 0.52 vs 0.54). Given that the consistency metric is known to favor smooth outputs, these small differences are not persuasive evidence that the running average improves spatio-temporal consistency. The authors should provide statistical significance over multiple runs, a more sensitive metric, or a direct analysis of the distribution of rendered feature statistics across views and timestamps to demonstrate that a single global normalization is valid for faithful AdaIN.
  4. [Contributions and Table 1] The contribution bullet 'we do not need a pre-trained style transfer module' is overstated. ZDySS relies on a pretrained VGG encoder and, crucially, the pretrained AdaIN decoder from [18] to convert stylized features into an RGB image. The decoder is a component of a style transfer system. What the method avoids is training a style-specific transformation MLP or performing per-style optimization. Please rephrase the claim to accurately reflect the use of pretrained components.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is not a valid Gaussian function: it is written as G(X) = exp(-1/2 mu^T Sigma^{-1} mu), which is independent of X. The correct expression should be G(X) = exp(-1/2 (X-mu)^T Sigma^{-1} (X-mu)).
  2. [Section 5.4, Eqs. (8) and (9)] The notation in the consistency metric formulas is not fully defined. Please define the warping function W, the masking function M_v, and the rendered view O_v, and clarify the meaning of 'masking' in this context.
  3. [Table 2 caption] The caption states 'The metrics are scaled by 10^3 for readability,' but it is unclear whether the table entries are the raw values multiplied by 10^3 or the raw values divided by 10^3. Please clarify.
  4. [Section 5.4] The paper states that metrics were computed on 'a randomly chosen set of four style images.' For reproducibility, please specify which four style images were used.
  5. [Section 2.2 and Section 5.4] There are several typos, including 'feed-feed forward' (should be 'feed-forward'), 'deadling' (should be 'dealing'), and 'consistencies' (likely 'inconsistencies').
  6. [Figure 5 and Section 6.2] The pretraining ablation is presented only qualitatively. Consider adding a quantitative comparison (e.g., rendered image metrics or stylization quality scores) to support the claim that pretraining retains finer details.
  7. [Table 1] The meaning of the '#Styles' column is ambiguous: for S-DyRF it lists '1', but S-DyRF is optimized per style, so it can handle different styles after retraining; please clarify what the column represents.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pipeline applies a known AdaIN transform to learned per-Gaussian features, with the zero-shot property inherited from AdaIN by direct construction rather than by fitting or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The zero-shot property is not obtained by fitting style-specific parameters and then re-predicting them; instead, the inference procedure literally evaluates the AdaIN expression (Eq. 5) using statistics of an arbitrary style image, with the scene's learned feature vectors as content input. The per-Gaussian feature vectors are trained with Lf = ||Fr - Fs(Ii)||_1 against VGG features of the ground-truth frames; this is a representation-learning loss, not a fit to the style images used at inference. The running average (mu_avg, sigma_ma) is an architectural choice for normalizing the learned features; it is not fitted to the queried styles, and the paper evaluates it against the naive per-frame normalization in Table 3, so the claimed consistency is an empirical claim rather than an identity. The use of the pretrained VGG encoder and AdaIN decoder is clearly attributed to prior work [18,55]; using a pretrained component does not make the derivation circular, because the paper does not claim to derive AdaIN itself. The only related-work mention that could be a self-citation ('Saroha et al.') is descriptive context and is not load-bearing for the method's validity. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical or conceptual entities. The main free parameters are the training schedule and the running average decay, which are not reported. The key assumptions are the validity of feature distillation for dynamic scenes and the linearity of the AdaIN application to per-Gaussian features.

free parameters (3)
  • Pretraining iterations (14000) and joint training iterations (7000) = 14000, 7000
    Chosen based on 4DGS and Feature 3DGS, but the specific values are not justified by the paper's own experiments beyond the pretraining ablation.
  • Semantic feature vector length = 512
    Set to match the VGG feature dimension; a design choice.
  • Running average of feature statistics = not specified
    The moving average mean and standard deviation are computed during training, but the exact decay factor or window is not reported. This is a free parameter of the method.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Per-Gaussian feature vectors can be learned by supervising the rendered feature map with VGG features.
    Assumed from Feature 3DGS, but its validity for dynamic scenes is not independently established.
  • ad hoc to paper Applying AdaIN to per-Gaussian features is equivalent to applying AdaIN to the rendered feature map due to linearity of the affine operation.
    Stated in Section 4.2, this linearity is crucial. While mathematically plausible, it assumes the rendering operation is linear w.r.t. the features, which is true for alpha-compositing but the normalization step is not linear in the feature map.
  • domain assumption A pre-trained AdaIN decoder can decode the stylized rendered feature maps into visually pleasing images.
    The decoder from AdaIN [18] is used without fine-tuning, assuming its learned mapping generalizes to the rendered feature maps of dynamic scenes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ZDySS -- Zero-Shot Dynamic Scene Stylization using Gaussian Splatting." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UM22JJQE

@misc{pith2026250103875,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ZDySS -- Zero-Shot Dynamic Scene Stylization using Gaussian Splatting},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UM22JJQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03875}
}
read the original abstract

Stylizing a dynamic scene based on an exemplar image is critical for various real-world applications, including gaming, filmmaking, and augmented and virtual reality. However, achieving consistent stylization across both spatial and temporal dimensions remains a significant challenge. Most existing methods are designed for static scenes and often require an optimization process for each style image, limiting their adaptability. We introduce ZDySS, a zero-shot stylization framework for dynamic scenes, allowing our model to generalize to previously unseen style images at inference. Our approach employs Gaussian splatting for scene representation, linking each Gaussian to a learned feature vector that renders a feature map for any given view and timestamp. By applying style transfer on the learned feature vectors instead of the rendered feature map, we enhance spatio-temporal consistency across frames. Our method demonstrates superior performance and coherence over state-of-the-art baselines in tests on real-world dynamic scenes, making it a robust solution for practical applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03875 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Given a multi-view video of a dynamic scene, we present a method that once trained on the scene, is able to perform high quality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Method Overview. The above figure provides an overview of our method Z-DySS. During the training phase, we follow a straightforward pipeline, similar to [25, 74]. In addition, we compute the moving average mean and sigma of the rendered feature map that is used during the inference time to normalize the learnt semantic feature vector fi of each 3D Gaussian, before being scaled and shifted by the feature properties o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative Results Here we show a comparative study of ZDySS against the baselines, namely S-DyRF, Ada-4DGS, and 4DGS￾Ada. It can be observed here that, despite not being optimized on every queried style image, ZDySS is able to faithfully stylize the given scene at various timesteps and viewpoints. ZDySS also retains most details out of all the methods, while carrying the style information. For instance, Ada-4DGS a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Style Interpolation We interpolate between the latent vectors of two different style images at test time, obtaining meaningful stylizations as we move from one style to another [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pretraining Pretraining the scene initially without the feature map supervision helps retain finer details in the stylized outputs. We pretrain the scene for 14000 iterations, as suggested in [63]. 6. Ablations 6.1. Style Interpolation In this ablation, we interpolate …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [18]

    Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization

    Xun Huang and Serge Belongie. Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE international conference on computer vi- sion, pages 1501–1510, 2017. 2, 3, 4, 6

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Matthew Tancik, Peter Hedman, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, and Pratul P

    Jonathan T. Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Matthew Tancik, Peter Hedman, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, and Pratul P. Srinivasan. Mip-nerf: A multiscale representation for anti-aliasing neu- ral radiance fields, 2021. 2

    2021

  3. [2]

    Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields

    Jonathan T Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Mip-nerf 360: Unbounded anti-aliased neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid-based neural radiance fields

    Jonathan T Barron, Ben Mildenhall, Dor Verbin, Pratul P Srinivasan, and Peter Hedman. Zip-nerf: Anti-aliased grid-based neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 19697–19705, 2023. 2

    2023

  5. [4]

    Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes

    Ang Cao and Justin Johnson. Hexplane: A fast representa- tion for dynamic scenes. CVPR, 2023. 3, 4

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Tensorf: Tensorial radiance fields

    Anpei Chen, Zexiang Xu, Andreas Geiger, Jingyi Yu, and Hao Su. Tensorf: Tensorial radiance fields. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  7. [6]

    Coherent online video style transfer

    Dongdong Chen, Jing Liao, Lu Yuan, Nenghai Yu, and Gang Hua. Coherent online video style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1105–1114, 2017. 3

    work page 2017

  8. [7]

    Upst-nerf: Uni- versal photorealistic style transfer of neural radiance fields for 3d scene, 2022

    Yaosen Chen, Qi Yuan, Zhiqiang Li, Yuegen Liu, Wei Wang, Chaoping Xie, Xuming Wen, and Qien Yu. Upst-nerf: Uni- versal photorealistic style transfer of neural radiance fields for 3d scene, 2022. 3

    work page 2022

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Stylizing 3d scene via im- plicit representation and hypernetwork, 2022

    Pei-Ze Chiang, Meng-Shiun Tsai, Hung-Yu Tseng, Wei sheng Lai, and Wei-Chen Chiu. Stylizing 3d scene via im- plicit representation and hypernetwork, 2022. 3

    2022

  2. [9]

    Arbitrary style transfer via multi-adaptation network

    Yingying Deng, Fan Tang, Weiming Dong, Wen Sun, Feiyue Huang, and Changsheng Xu. Arbitrary style transfer via multi-adaptation network. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia, 2020. 3

    2020

  3. [10]

    4d-rotor gaussian splatting: towards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes

    Yuanxing Duan, Fangyin Wei, Qiyu Dai, Yuhang He, Wen- zheng Chen, and Baoquan Chen. 4d-rotor gaussian splatting: towards efficient novel view synthesis for dynamic scenes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers , pages 1–11,

    2024

  4. [11]

    Unified implicit neural styliza- tion

    Zhiwen Fan, Yifan Jiang, Peihao Wang, Xinyu Gong, Dejia Xu, and Zhangyang Wang. Unified implicit neural styliza- tion. In European Conference on Computer Vision , 2022. 3

    2022

  5. [12]

    K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance

    Sara Fridovich-Keil, Giacomo Meanti, Frederik Rahbæk Warburg, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. K-planes: Explicit radiance fields in space, time, and appearance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition, pages 12479–12488, 2023. 2, 3

    2023

  6. [13]

    Dynamic view synthesis from dynamic monocular video

    Chen Gao, Ayush Saraf, Johannes Kopf, and Jia-Bin Huang. Dynamic view synthesis from dynamic monocular video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5712–5721, 2021. 3

    2021

  7. [14]

    Im- age style transfer using convolutional neural networks

    Leon A Gatys, Alexander S Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. Im- age style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2414–2423, 2016. 1, 3

    2016

  8. [15]

    Stylemesh: Style transfer for indoor 3d scene reconstruc- tions

    Lukas H ¨ollein, Justin Johnson, and Matthias Nießner. Stylemesh: Style transfer for indoor 3d scene reconstruc- tions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 6198–6208,

  9. [16]

    Real- time neural style transfer for videos

    Haozhi Huang, Hao Wang, Wenhan Luo, Lin Ma, Wen- hao Jiang, Xiaolong Zhu, Zhifeng Li, and Wei Liu. Real- time neural style transfer for videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 783–791, 2017. 3

    2017

  10. [17]

    Learning to stylize novel views

    Hsin-Ping Huang, Hung-Yu Tseng, Saurabh Saini, Maneesh Singh, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Learning to stylize novel views. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con- ference on Computer Vision, 2021. 3

    2021

  11. [19]

    Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as styl- ized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning

    Yi-Hua Huang, Yue He, Yu-Jie Yuan, Yu-Kun Lai, and Lin Gao. Stylizednerf: consistent 3d scene stylization as styl- ized nerf via 2d-3d mutual learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18342–18352, 2022. 1, 3

    2022

  12. [20]

    Stylizing video by example

    Ond ˇrej Jamri ˇska, ˇS´arka Sochorov ´a, Ond ˇrej Texler, Michal Luk´aˇc, Jakub Fiˇser, Jingwan Lu, Eli Shechtman, and Daniel S`ykora. Stylizing video by example. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 38(4):1–11, 2019. 3

    2019

  13. [21]

    Percep- tual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution

    Justin Johnson, Alexandre Alahi, and Li Fei-Fei. Percep- tual losses for real-time style transfer and super-resolution. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Confer- ence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pages 694–711. Springer, 2016. 3

    2016

  14. [22]

    Geometry transfer for stylizing radiance fields, 2024

    Hyunyoung Jung, Seonghyeon Nam, Nikolaos Sarafianos, Sungjoo Yoo, Alexander Sorkine-Hornung, and Rakesh Ran- jan. Geometry transfer for stylizing radiance fields, 2024. 2

    2024

  15. [23]

    3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering

    Bernhard Kerbl, Georgios Kopanas, Thomas Leimk ¨uhler, and George Drettakis. 3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42 (4), 2023. 1, 2, 3, 4

    2023

  16. [24]

    G-style: Stylized gaussian splatting

    ´Aron Samuel Kov ´acs, Pedro Hermosilla, and Renata G Raidou. G-style: Stylized gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15695, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Dgd: Dynamic 3d gaussians distillation, 2024

    Isaac Labe, Noam Issachar, Itai Lang, and Sagie Benaim. Dgd: Dynamic 3d gaussians distillation, 2024. 4, 5

    2024

  18. [26]

    Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video

    Tianye Li, Mira Slavcheva, Michael Zollhoefer, Simon Green, Christoph Lassner, Changil Kim, Tanner Schmidt, Steven Lovegrove, Michael Goesele, Richard Newcombe, et al. Neural 3d video synthesis from multi-view video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- si...

    2022

  19. [27]

    Learning linear transformations for fast image and video style transfer

    Xueting Li, Sifei Liu, Jan Kautz, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Learning linear transformations for fast image and video style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019. 3 9

    2019

  20. [28]

    S-dyrf: Reference-based styl- ized radiance fields for dynamic scenes

    Xingyi Li, Zhiguo Cao, Yizheng Wu, Kewei Wang, Ke Xian, Zhe Wang, and Guosheng Lin. S-dyrf: Reference-based styl- ized radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20102–20112, 2024. 2, 3, 5, 6

    2024

  21. [29]

    Universal style transfer via feature transforms

    Yijun Li, Chen Fang, Jimei Yang, Zhaowen Wang, Xin Lu, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Universal style transfer via feature transforms. Advances in neural information processing sys- tems, 2017. 3

    2017

  22. [30]

    Neural scene flow fields for space-time view synthesis of dy- namic scenes

    Zhengqi Li, Simon Niklaus, Noah Snavely, and Oliver Wang. Neural scene flow fields for space-time view synthesis of dy- namic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021. 3

    2021

  23. [31]

    Spacetime gaus- sian feature splatting for real-time dynamic view synthesis

    Zhan Li, Zhang Chen, Zhong Li, and Yi Xu. Spacetime gaus- sian feature splatting for real-time dynamic view synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8508–8520, 2024. 3

    2024

  24. [32]

    4dstylegaussian: Zero-shot 4d style trans- fer with gaussian splatting, 2024

    Wanlin Liang, Hongbin Xu, Weitao Chen, Feng Xiao, and Wenxiong Kang. 4dstylegaussian: Zero-shot 4d style trans- fer with gaussian splatting, 2024. 4

    2024

  25. [33]

    Autoint: Automatic integration for fast neural volume ren- dering

    David B Lindell, Julien NP Martel, and Gordon Wetzstein. Autoint: Automatic integration for fast neural volume ren- dering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 14556– 14565, 2021. 2

    2021

  26. [34]

    Stylerf: Zero-shot 3d style transfer of neural radiance fields

    Kunhao Liu, Fangneng Zhan, Yiwen Chen, Jiahui Zhang, Yingchen Yu, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik, Shijian Lu, and Eric P Xing. Stylerf: Zero-shot 3d style transfer of neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 1, 3

    2023

  27. [35]

    Stylegaussian: Instant 3d style transfer with gaussian splatting

    Kunhao Liu, Fangneng Zhan, Muyu Xu, Christian Theobalt, Ling Shao, and Shijian Lu. Stylegaussian: Instant 3d style transfer with gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07807, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Adaattn: Revisit attention mechanism in arbitrary neural style transfer

    Songhua Liu, Tianwei Lin, Dongliang He, Fu Li, Meiling Wang, Xin Li, Zhengxing Sun, Qian Li, and Errui Ding. Adaattn: Revisit attention mechanism in arbitrary neural style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021. 3

    2021

  29. [37]

    Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis

    Jonathon Luiten, Georgios Kopanas, Bastian Leibe, and Deva Ramanan. Dynamic 3d gaussians: Tracking by per- sistent dynamic view synthesis. In 2024 International Con- ference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 800–809. IEEE, 2024. 3

    2024

  30. [38]

    Nerf in the wild: Neural radiance fields for uncon- strained photo collections

    Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Noha Radwan, Mehdi SM Sajjadi, Jonathan T Barron, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Daniel Duck- worth. Nerf in the wild: Neural radiance fields for uncon- strained photo collections. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Reference- based controllable scene stylization with gaussian splatting

    Yiqun Mei, Jiacong Xu, and Vishal M Patel. Reference- based controllable scene stylization with gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07220, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis

    Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Matthew Tancik, Jonathan T Barron, Ravi Ramamoorthi, and Ren Ng. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view syn- thesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021. 1, 2

    2021

  33. [41]

    Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars, 2023

    Arthur Moreau, Jifei Song, Helisa Dhamo, Richard Shaw, Yiren Zhou, and Eduardo P ´erez-Pellitero. Human gaussian splatting: Real-time rendering of animatable avatars, 2023. 1

    2023

  34. [42]

    3d photo stylization: Learning to generate stylized novel views from a single image

    Fangzhou Mu, Jian Wang, Yicheng Wu, and Yin Li. 3d photo stylization: Learning to generate stylized novel views from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16273– 16282, 2022. 3

    2022

  35. [43]

    Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding

    Thomas M ¨uller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexan- der Keller. Instant neural graphics primitives with a mul- tiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 41(4):1–15, 2022. 2

    2022

  36. [44]

    Snerf: Stylized neural implicit representations for 3d scenes

    Thu Nguyen-Phuoc, Feng Liu, and Lei Xiao. Snerf: Stylized neural implicit representations for 3d scenes. ACM Trans. Graph., 2022. 1, 2, 3

    2022

  37. [45]

    Ash: Animatable gaussian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering, 2023

    Haokai Pang, Heming Zhu, Adam Kortylewski, Christian Theobalt, and Marc Habermann. Ash: Animatable gaussian splats for efficient and photoreal human rendering, 2023. 1

    2023

  38. [46]

    Lo- cally stylized neural radiance fields

    Hong-Wing Pang, Binh-Son Hua, and Sai-Kit Yeung. Lo- cally stylized neural radiance fields. In IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023. 3

    2023

  39. [47]

    Arbitrary style transfer with style-attentional networks

    Dae Young Park and Kwang Hee Lee. Arbitrary style transfer with style-attentional networks. In proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019. 3

    2019

  40. [48]

    Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields

    Keunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Jonathan T Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Steven M Seitz, and Ricardo Martin-Brualla. Nerfies: Deformable neural radiance fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5865–5874, 2021. 3

    2021

  41. [49]

    Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Ricardo Martin- Brualla, and Steven M

    Keunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Peter Hedman, Jonathan T. Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Ricardo Martin- Brualla, and Steven M. Seitz. Hypernerf: A higher- dimensional representation for topologically varying neural radiance fields. ACM Trans. Graph., 40(6), 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes

    Albert Pumarola, Enric Corona, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Francesc Moreno-Noguer. D-nerf: Neural radiance fields for dynamic scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10318–10327, 2021. 3

    2021

  43. [51]

    Gaus- sianavatars: Photorealistic head avatars with rigged 3d gaus- sians, 2023

    Shenhan Qian, Tobias Kirschstein, Liam Schoneveld, Davide Davoli, Simon Giebenhain, and Matthias Nießner. Gaus- sianavatars: Photorealistic head avatars with rigged 3d gaus- sians, 2023. 1

    2023

  44. [52]

    Kilonerf: Speeding up neural radiance fields with thousands of tiny mlps, 2021

    Christian Reiser, Songyou Peng, Yiyi Liao, and Andreas Geiger. Kilonerf: Speeding up neural radiance fields with thousands of tiny mlps, 2021. 2

    2021

  45. [53]

    Artistic style transfer for videos and spherical images

    Manuel Ruder, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. Artistic style transfer for videos and spherical images. Inter- national Journal of Computer Vision , 126(11):1199–1219,

  46. [54]

    Avatar- net: Multi-scale zero-shot style transfer by feature decora- tion

    Lu Sheng, Ziyi Lin, Jing Shao, and Xiaogang Wang. Avatar- net: Multi-scale zero-shot style transfer by feature decora- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018. 3 10

    2018

  47. [55]

    Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convo- lutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014. 4, 5, 6

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Two-stage peer-regularized feature recom- bination for arbitrary image style transfer

    Jan Svoboda, Asha Anoosheh, Christian Osendorfer, and Jonathan Masci. Two-stage peer-regularized feature recom- bination for arbitrary image style transfer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020. 3

    2020

  49. [57]

    Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis

    Matthew Tancik, Vincent Casser, Xinchen Yan, Sabeek Prad- han, Ben Mildenhall, Pratul P Srinivasan, Jonathan T Barron, and Henrik Kretzschmar. Block-nerf: Scalable large scene neural view synthesis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Reco...

    2022

  50. [58]

    Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow, 2020

    Zachary Teed and Jia Deng. Raft: Recurrent all-pairs field transforms for optical flow, 2020. 6

    2020

  51. [59]

    Non- rigid neural radiance fields: Reconstruction and novel view synthesis of a dynamic scene from monocular video

    Edgar Tretschk, Ayush Tewari, Vladislav Golyanik, Michael Zollh¨ofer, Christoph Lassner, and Christian Theobalt. Non- rigid neural radiance fields: Reconstruction and novel view synthesis of a dynamic scene from monocular video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Con...

    2021

  52. [60]

    Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization

    Can Wang, Ruixiang Jiang, Menglei Chai, Mingming He, Dongdong Chen, and Jing Liao. Nerf-art: Text-driven neural radiance fields stylization. IEEE Transactions on Visualiza- tion and Computer Graphics, 2023. 3

    2023

  53. [61]

    Consistent video style transfer via compound regu- larization

    Wenjing Wang, Jizheng Xu, Li Zhang, Yue Wang, and Jiay- ing Liu. Consistent video style transfer via compound regu- larization. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artifi- cial intelligence, pages 12233–12240, 2020. 3

    2020

  54. [62]

    Consistent video style transfer via relaxation and regular- ization

    Wenjing Wang, Shuai Yang, Jizheng Xu, and Jiaying Liu. Consistent video style transfer via relaxation and regular- ization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29:9125– 9139, 2020. 3

    2020

  55. [63]

    4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering

    Guanjun Wu, Taoran Yi, Jiemin Fang, Lingxi Xie, Xiaopeng Zhang, Wei Wei, Wenyu Liu, Qi Tian, and Xinggang Wang. 4d gaussian splatting for real-time dynamic scene rendering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20310–20320,...

    2024

  56. [64]

    Dˆ2nerf: Self-supervised decoupling of dynamic and static objects from a monocular video

    Tianhao Wu, Fangcheng Zhong, Andrea Tagliasacchi, For- rester Cole, and Cengiz Oztireli. Dˆ2nerf: Self-supervised decoupling of dynamic and static objects from a monocular video. Advances in neural information processing systems , 35:32653–32666, 2022. 3

    2022

  57. [65]

    Style- former: Real-time arbitrary style transfer via parametric style composition

    Xiaolei Wu, Zhihao Hu, Lu Sheng, and Dong Xu. Style- former: Real-time arbitrary style transfer via parametric style composition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision, 2021. 3

    2021

  58. [66]

    Space-time neural irradiance fields for free-viewpoint video

    Wenqi Xian, Jia-Bin Huang, Johannes Kopf, and Changil Kim. Space-time neural irradiance fields for free-viewpoint video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9421–9431,

  59. [67]

    Styledyrf: Zero-shot 4d style trans- fer for dynamic neural radiance fields

    Hongbin Xu, Weitao Chen, Feng Xiao, Baigui Sun, and Wenxiong Kang. Styledyrf: Zero-shot 4d style trans- fer for dynamic neural radiance fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08310, 2024. 2, 4

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Real-time photorealistic dynamic scene representation and rendering with 4d gaussian splatting

    Zeyu Yang, Hongye Yang, Zijie Pan, and Li Zhang. Real-time photorealistic dynamic scene representation and rendering with 4d gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10642, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Deformable 3d gaussians for high- fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction

    Ziyi Yang, Xinyu Gao, Wen Zhou, Shaohui Jiao, Yuqing Zhang, and Xiaogang Jin. Deformable 3d gaussians for high- fidelity monocular dynamic scene reconstruction. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20331–20341, 2024. 2, 3, 4

    2024

  62. [70]

    Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks, 2021

    Alex Yu, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Matthew Tancik, Qinhong Chen, Benjamin Recht, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks, 2021. 2

    2021

  63. [71]

    Arf: Artistic radiance fields, 2022

    Kai Zhang, Nick Kolkin, Sai Bi, Fujun Luan, Zexiang Xu, Eli Shechtman, and Noah Snavely. Arf: Artistic radiance fields, 2022. 1, 2, 3

    2022

  64. [72]

    Ref-npr: Reference-based non-photorealistic radi- ance fields for controllable scene stylization

    Yuechen Zhang, Zexin He, Jinbo Xing, Xufeng Yao, and Ji- aya Jia. Ref-npr: Reference-based non-photorealistic radi- ance fields for controllable scene stylization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, 2023. 1, 2, 3

    2023

  65. [73]

    Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis, 2023

    Shunyuan Zheng, Boyao Zhou, Ruizhi Shao, Boning Liu, Shengping Zhang, Liqiang Nie, and Yebin Liu. Gps- gaussian: Generalizable pixel-wise 3d gaussian splatting for real-time human novel view synthesis, 2023. 1

    2023

  66. [74]

    Feature 3dgs: Supercharging 3d gaussian splatting to enable distilled feature fields

    Shijie Zhou, Haoran Chang, Sicheng Jiang, Zhiwen Fan, Ze- hao Zhu, Dejia Xu, Pradyumna Chari, Suya You, Zhangyang Wang, and Achuta Kadambi. Feature 3dgs: Supercharging 3d gaussian splatting to enable distilled feature fields. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Compu...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.